Re: [Oorexx-devel] Ad state of docs/branches/5.0.0

Re > On 22. Dec 2022, at 01:15, Gilbert Barmwater wrote: > > And thanks for all the work I know this took! > > Gil It is a bit depressing to spend half a day hunting for the problem and in the end all you do is replacing zip -r -q with 7zz a In the end it was a good thing; I went through my

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Ad state of docs/branches/5.0.0

I'll have a look first thing in the AM.  I'm sure that this will fix the problem. I think documenting the dependency in the HowTo should be sufficient. And thanks for all the work I know this took! Gil On 12/21/2022 6:31 PM, ooRexx wrote: Dear Gil, This was a bit trickier than I expected, i

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Ad state of docs/branches/5.0.0

Dear Gil, This was a bit trickier than I expected, it seems the default zip on Apple macOS (zip version 3.0) does not produce Windows conform zip files. I tried several settings but nothing seems to work. I have also tried a number of other zippers without luck until I found that 7zip seems to

Re: [Oorexx-devel] pdf.xsl (Re: Going ahead with ... (Re: Documentation: remove author list from front page ?

Done for bldoc_rx.  Will also update the bldoc_win folder in both places as well. Gil On 12/21/2022 2:10 PM, Gilbert Barmwater wrote: OK, finally had a chance to look at the proposed 1 line change and to test it out and it looks good.  As this file has other modifications which are documented

[Oorexx-devel] updateEntityValues with revision information

Enclosed you find the latest version of "updateEntityValues.rex" that should go into the tools directory. Ad revisions for the documentation: there is a little catch here. When updating "${book}/en-US/${book}.ent" and then checking in the changed docs the latest revision will be of the just ch

Re: [Oorexx-devel] pdf.xsl (Re: Going ahead with ... (Re: Documentation: remove author list from front page ?

OK, finally had a chance to look at the proposed 1 line change and to test it out and it looks good.  As this file has other modifications which are documented in sources.txt, I will update both files shortly and commit them to both trunk and branches. Gil On 12/20/2022 11:22 AM, Gilbert Barm

Re: [Oorexx-devel] tools/bldoc_orx/setup.rex error, non existing server?

I agree with P.O. regarding building documents. The most I’d expect is a build (plain text) document that would list dependencies, including minimum version, as well as their home. Personally, I’ve always built oorexx from source, but I’ve never found it necessary to build the docs. Bruce Sen

Re: [Oorexx-devel] tools/bldoc_orx/setup.rex error, non existing server?

Dear Gil, In my experience every URL is invalid the next time you try to use it :-) so my approach is another one. For macOS and Linux I included zipped folders with a set of tools that DID work when I zipped them, as well as a list of requirements that the user must take care of him/herself. I

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Ad state of docs/branches/5.0.0

I have no idea.  As of Windows 10, zip file handling is integrated with file explorer.  I.e. one can zip or extract(unzip) files directly from the file explorer sub_menu.  A zip file is recognized as a kind-of directory apparently. Gil On 12/21/2022 11:34 AM, ooRexx wrote: Hi Gil, I am read

Re: [Oorexx-devel] tools/bldoc_orx/setup.rex error, non existing server?

When I first wrote setup.rex the goal was to make it easy for the new (Windows) user to get all the pieces needed to build the ooRexx documentation.  Most of those pieces were pretty straight forward as they were fairly static so coding web addresses and file names was not a problem.  FOP howev

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Ad state of docs/branches/5.0.0

Hi Gil, I am reading this (on macOS) checking the version of the default zipper (macOS uses zip 3.0) BUGS zip 3.0 is not compatible with PKUNZIP 1.10. Use zip 1.1 to produce zip files which can be extracted by PKUNZIP 1.10. Are you by any chance using pkzip/pkunzip? What is the d

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Ad state of docs/branches/5.0.0

+1 Thanks for investigating! On 12/21/2022 10:21 AM, ooRexx wrote: On 21. Dec 2022, at 15:57, Gilbert Barmwater wrote: Hi P.O., I saw new uploads of the Release Candidate documents so I tried downloading the reexxref_html zip file to have a look. Although it downloads some 5.3Mb, when I

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Ad state of docs/branches/5.0.0

I just tried on Ubuntu and it worked just fine there. Hälsningar/Regards/Grüsse, ooRexx oor...@jonases.se > On 21. Dec 2022, at 16:21, ooRexx wrote: > > >> On 21. Dec 2022, at 15:57, Gilbert Barmwater > > wrote: >> >> Hi P.O., >> >> I saw new uploads of the Rele

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Ad state of docs/branches/5.0.0

> On 21. Dec 2022, at 15:57, Gilbert Barmwater wrote: > > Hi P.O., > > I saw new uploads of the Release Candidate documents so I tried downloading > the reexxref_html zip file to have a look. Although it downloads some 5.3Mb, > when I attempt to look inside the downloaded file or extract all

[Oorexx-devel] Updated script (Re: Ad state of docs/branches/5.0.0

Sorry, attached the wrong version of the script, please use the one attached to this e-mail and place it into the "tools" subdirectory. ---rony On 21.12.2022 15:58, Rony G. Flatscher wrote: On 21.12.2022 14:48, Gilbert Barmwater wrote: Good morning!  I am planning on working on this today, I

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Ad state of docs/branches/5.0.0

On 21.12.2022 14:48, Gilbert Barmwater wrote: Good morning!  I am planning on working on this today, I just need a little more time.  I will also look at the revision string question as well. Good morning, Gil! Enclosed you and P.O. - and everyone else who is interested - to find a script "up

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Ad state of docs/branches/5.0.0

Hi P.O., I saw new uploads of the Release Candidate documents so I tried downloading the reexxref_html zip file to have a look. Although it downloads some 5.3Mb, when I attempt to look inside the downloaded file or extract all the pieces, I see an empty folder!  I'm on Windows 10 if that matt

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Ad state of docs/branches/5.0.0

Good morning!  I am planning on working on this today, I just need a little more time.  I will also look at the revision string question as well. Gil On 12/21/2022 6:21 AM, Rony G. Flatscher wrote: Dear P.O., On 21.12.2022 09:45, ooRexx wrote: When I looked a bit closer I found the change :-)

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Question ad release documentation ...

Dear P.O., On 21.12.2022 11:24, ooRexx wrote: I have no objection to the changes below but I would like the revision information still visible somewhere in the beginning of each book; that is useful for trunk later on as the date may reflect the build date of the book so if it is built later (w

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Ad state of docs/branches/5.0.0

Dear P.O., On 21.12.2022 09:45, ooRexx wrote: When I looked a bit closer I found the change :-) If you agree I prefer that I do the update for macOS and Linux tools, they are in these two zipped folders oorexxdocs_macOS_2022-06-30.zip +1 oorexxdocs-Ubuntu_2020-06-16.zip I will test and buil

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Question ad release documentation ...

Dear Rony, I have no objection to the changes below but I would like the revision information still visible somewhere in the beginning of each book; that is useful for trunk later on as the date may reflect the build date of the book so if it is built later (without updating SVN) the date may b

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Ad state of docs/branches/5.0.0

Dear Rony, When I looked a bit closer I found the change :-) If you agree I prefer that I do the update for macOS and Linux tools, they are in these two zipped folders oorexxdocs_macOS_2022-06-30.zip oorexxdocs-Ubuntu_2020-06-16.zip I will test and build and then update those files with the new