Re: [Oorexx-devel] Ad state of docs/branches/5.0.0

Hey P.O., Sorry, it is a little early in the AM for me.  Are you referring to the revision info in the ENTITY settings? Or are there others that I missed? Gil On 12/22/2022 8:10 AM, ooRexx wrote: Dear Gil, If you look closely there ARE changes to the html version, all good ones as proposed

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Ad state of docs/branches/5.0.0

Dear Gil, If you look closely there ARE changes to the html version, all good ones as proposed by Rony. Hälsningar/Regards/Grüsse, ooRexx oor...@jonases.se > On 22. Dec 2022, at 14:07, Gilbert Barmwater wrote: > > As I suspected, this fixed the problem! Good work! > > One reason I wanted

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Ad state of docs/branches/5.0.0

On 22.12.2022 14:07, Gilbert Barmwater wrote: As I suspected, this fixed the problem!  Good work! One reason I wanted to look at the HTML version was to see if the authors are listed on the title page there too.  And they are - BUT - there is no page 2 equivalent so eliminating them from the t

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Ad state of docs/branches/5.0.0

As I suspected, this fixed the problem!  Good work! One reason I wanted to look at the HTML version was to see if the authors are listed on the title page there too.  And they are - BUT - there is no page 2 equivalent so eliminating them from the title page would eliminate them altogether.  Th

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Ad state of docs/branches/5.0.0

Re > On 22. Dec 2022, at 01:15, Gilbert Barmwater wrote: > > And thanks for all the work I know this took! > > Gil It is a bit depressing to spend half a day hunting for the problem and in the end all you do is replacing zip -r -q with 7zz a In the end it was a good thing; I went through my

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Ad state of docs/branches/5.0.0

I'll have a look first thing in the AM.  I'm sure that this will fix the problem. I think documenting the dependency in the HowTo should be sufficient. And thanks for all the work I know this took! Gil On 12/21/2022 6:31 PM, ooRexx wrote: Dear Gil, This was a bit trickier than I expected, i

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Ad state of docs/branches/5.0.0

Dear Gil, This was a bit trickier than I expected, it seems the default zip on Apple macOS (zip version 3.0) does not produce Windows conform zip files. I tried several settings but nothing seems to work. I have also tried a number of other zippers without luck until I found that 7zip seems to

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Ad state of docs/branches/5.0.0

I have no idea.  As of Windows 10, zip file handling is integrated with file explorer.  I.e. one can zip or extract(unzip) files directly from the file explorer sub_menu.  A zip file is recognized as a kind-of directory apparently. Gil On 12/21/2022 11:34 AM, ooRexx wrote: Hi Gil, I am read

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Ad state of docs/branches/5.0.0

Hi Gil, I am reading this (on macOS) checking the version of the default zipper (macOS uses zip 3.0) BUGS zip 3.0 is not compatible with PKUNZIP 1.10. Use zip 1.1 to produce zip files which can be extracted by PKUNZIP 1.10. Are you by any chance using pkzip/pkunzip? What is the d

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Ad state of docs/branches/5.0.0

+1 Thanks for investigating! On 12/21/2022 10:21 AM, ooRexx wrote: On 21. Dec 2022, at 15:57, Gilbert Barmwater wrote: Hi P.O., I saw new uploads of the Release Candidate documents so I tried downloading the reexxref_html zip file to have a look. Although it downloads some 5.3Mb, when I

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Ad state of docs/branches/5.0.0

I just tried on Ubuntu and it worked just fine there. Hälsningar/Regards/Grüsse, ooRexx oor...@jonases.se > On 21. Dec 2022, at 16:21, ooRexx wrote: > > >> On 21. Dec 2022, at 15:57, Gilbert Barmwater > > wrote: >> >> Hi P.O., >> >> I saw new uploads of the Rele

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Ad state of docs/branches/5.0.0

> On 21. Dec 2022, at 15:57, Gilbert Barmwater wrote: > > Hi P.O., > > I saw new uploads of the Release Candidate documents so I tried downloading > the reexxref_html zip file to have a look. Although it downloads some 5.3Mb, > when I attempt to look inside the downloaded file or extract all

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Ad state of docs/branches/5.0.0

On 21.12.2022 14:48, Gilbert Barmwater wrote: Good morning!  I am planning on working on this today, I just need a little more time.  I will also look at the revision string question as well. Good morning, Gil! Enclosed you and P.O. - and everyone else who is interested - to find a script "up

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Ad state of docs/branches/5.0.0

Hi P.O., I saw new uploads of the Release Candidate documents so I tried downloading the reexxref_html zip file to have a look. Although it downloads some 5.3Mb, when I attempt to look inside the downloaded file or extract all the pieces, I see an empty folder!  I'm on Windows 10 if that matt

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Ad state of docs/branches/5.0.0

Good morning!  I am planning on working on this today, I just need a little more time.  I will also look at the revision string question as well. Gil On 12/21/2022 6:21 AM, Rony G. Flatscher wrote: Dear P.O., On 21.12.2022 09:45, ooRexx wrote: When I looked a bit closer I found the change :-)

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Ad state of docs/branches/5.0.0

Dear P.O., On 21.12.2022 09:45, ooRexx wrote: When I looked a bit closer I found the change :-) If you agree I prefer that I do the update for macOS and Linux tools, they are in these two zipped folders oorexxdocs_macOS_2022-06-30.zip +1 oorexxdocs-Ubuntu_2020-06-16.zip I will test and buil

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Ad state of docs/branches/5.0.0

Dear Rony, When I looked a bit closer I found the change :-) If you agree I prefer that I do the update for macOS and Linux tools, they are in these two zipped folders oorexxdocs_macOS_2022-06-30.zip oorexxdocs-Ubuntu_2020-06-16.zip I will test and build and then update those files with the new