to provide the answer.
Gerard Freriks
+31 620 34 70 88
+31 182 22 59 46
gf...@luna.nl
Kattensingel 20
2801 CA Gouda
the Netherlands
> On 10 Oct 2019, at 11:29, Vebjørn Arntzen via openEHR-clinical
> wrote:
>
> d. Although measures have been taken to implement internation
by authorising
clinicians. In this latter sense, it may be considered equivalent to a signed
document.
Gerard Freriks
+31 620 34 70 88
+31 182 22 59 46
gf...@luna.nl
Kattensingel 20
2801 CA Gouda
the Netherlands
> On 5 Jun 2019, at 20:17, Jussara macedo wrote:
>
> I would call my con
Hi,
Afaik.
Composition is to document one complete encounter.
I use the ENTRY to start documenting the Documentation process.
And CLUSTERS to deal with Pannels with Clinical Statements.
Gerard Freriks
+31 620 34 70 88
+31 182 22 59 46
gf...@luna.nl
Kattensingel 20
2801 CA Gouda
22 59 46
gf...@luna.nl
Kattensingel 20
2801 CA Gouda
the Netherlands
> On 8 Mar 2019, at 09:07, Vebjørn Arntzen via openEHR-clinical
> wrote:
>
> Hi, Dileep
>
> There are nodes in archetypes where it could, and perhaps should, be
> recommended to use terminology wh
.
And then per Panel component two CLUSTERS: one for data and one for its context.
Gerard Freriks
+31 620 34 70 88
+31 182 22 59 46
gf...@luna.nl
Kattensingel 20
2801 CA Gouda
the Netherlands
> On 7 Mar 2019, at 05:33, Heather Leslie
> wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> Th
that it is about the Cardiac
Output of Blood.
In this way, making these choices, the Boundary problem between structure and
coding system is avoided.
Gerard Freriks
+31 620347088
gf...@luna.nl
Kattensingel 20
2801 CA Gouda
the Netherlands
> On 5 Sep 2018, at 09:48, David Moner wrote:
>
Data of perfect quality means, in my opinion, data and their complete context.
A diagnosis by a nurse is not the same as one by a patiente, or strting intern,
or one MD with 20m years experience.
Just mentioning one example.
Gerard Freriks
+31 620347088
gf...@luna.nl
Kattensingel 20
2801
Dear Evelyn,
The ideas I have are collected in a rough document called SIAMM (Semantic
Interpretability Artefact Modelling Method)
This is known by several persons active in ISO/CEN.
At present I’m no longer actively involved in standardisation work.
Gerard Freriks
+31 620347088
gf
not compete, do not overlap.
Gerard Freriks
+31 620347088
gf...@luna.nl
Kattensingel 20
2801 CA Gouda
the Netherlands
> On 29 Jun 2018, at 00:15, Bert Verhees wrote:
>
> GF said: We need standards on how to describe the health data and their
> epistemology/context, modeling patter
Gerard Freriks
+31 620347088
gf...@luna.nl
Kattensingel 20
2801 CA Gouda
the Netherlands
> On 28 Jun 2018, at 16:03, Stefan Sauermann
> wrote:
>
> Instead, the greatest hope for effective systems will be realized when the
> infrastructure for introducing comp
when those
conditions apply to cross-border processing of such data.
Gerard Freriks
+31 620347088
gf...@luna.nl
Kattensingel 20
2801 CA Gouda
the Netherlands
> On 27 Jun 2018, at 12:36, Karsten Hilbert wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 12:28:30PM +0200, Diego Bo
with: 'but that is currently illegal under EU GDPR.'
Gerard Freriks
+31 620347088
gf...@luna.nl
Kattensingel 20
2801 CA Gouda
the Netherlands
> On 27 Jun 2018, at 12:18, Karsten Hilbert wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 11:57:05AM +0200, Stefan Sauermann wrote:
>
>>
I agree fully.
This implies that on the fly small archetypes need to be used to store one or
more aspects.
Gerard Freriks
+31 620347088
gf...@luna.nl
Kattensingel 20
2801 CA Gouda
the Netherlands
> On 26 Jun 2018, at 18:10, Dr Evelyn Hovenga wrote:
>
> Bert nurses think
to collect data for ordering of procedures (diagnostic, treatment)
Gerard Freriks
+31 620347088
gf...@luna.nl
Kattensingel 20
2801 CA Gouda
the Netherlands
> On 25 Jun 2018, at 16:51, Anastasiou A. wrote:
>
> Hello Bert and all
>
>> I wonder if besides that ap
different. It is much more finding a diagnosis and
treatment or proving that there some diagnosis do not apply.
Hospital patient are a highly selected group of patients.
Gerard Freriks
+31 620347088
gf...@luna.nl
Kattensingel 20
2801 CA Gouda
the Netherlands
> On 25 Jun 2018, at 14:56, Anastas
Freriks
+31 620347088
gf...@luna.nl
Kattensingel 20
2801 CA Gouda
the Netherlands
> On 25 Jun 2018, at 12:52, Bert Verhees wrote:
>
> On 25-06-18 12:40, GF wrote:
>> Providing health and care is part science and for a large part an art.
>> Meaning that humans are need
.
GF
Gerard Freriks
+31 620347088
gf...@luna.nl
Kattensingel 20
2801 CA Gouda
the Netherlands
> On 25 Jun 2018, at 12:21, Stefan Sauermann
> wrote:
>
> 82% of correct recognition rate is a desaster in healthcare.
> 74% is even worse.
>
> My evidence based fee
you do’ one needs to provide the context.
Be it: on human body function, human activity or Participation as social
activity with others.
http://www.who.int/classifications/icf/icfbeginnersguide.pdf
Gerard Freriks
Gerard Freriks
+31 620347088
gf...@luna.nl
Kattensingel 20
2801 CA Gouda
nothing
but being bored.
In order to answer this question one needs to scope the context, the reason why
one wants to know and record it.
Questions that need to be answered first:
Why do you ask the question?
And for what purpose will you use the answer?
Gerard Freriks
+31 620347088
gf...@luna.nl
The scope of LOINC is NOT the same as the scope of SNOMED.
Gerard Freriks
+31 620347088
gf...@luna.nl
Kattensingel 20
2801 CA Gouda
the Netherlands
> On 12 Mar 2018, at 08:39, Mikael Nyström <mikael.nyst...@liu.se> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I do that too. It seems like
gf...@luna.nl
Kattensingel 20
2801 CA Gouda
the Netherlands
> On 12 Mar 2018, at 01:38, Pablo Pazos <pablo.pa...@cabolabs.com> wrote:
>
> Now that I have more experience with SNOMED expressions, I like the idea of
> doing the binding with an expression, also I think an e
- etc.
Gerard Freriks
+31 620347088
gf...@luna.nl
Kattensingel 20
2801 CA Gouda
the Netherlands
> On 1 Mar 2018, at 22:47, Sam Heard <sam.he...@oceaninformatics.com> wrote:
>
> HI All
> Goals and targets are an example of ranges as data. The INR treatment range
> is a
Gerard Freriks
+31 620347088
gf...@luna.nl
Kattensingel 20
2801 CA Gouda
the Netherlands
> On 28 Feb 2018, at 14:42, Seref Arikan <serefari...@kurumsalteknoloji.com>
> wrote:
>
> Hi Tom,
>
> The original question is talking about 'threshold's changing in
David,
Thanks for the White paper.
I think I agree.
What is the latest news from Spain?
GF
Gerard Freriks
+31 620347088
gf...@luna.nl
Kattensingel 20
2801 CA Gouda
the Netherlands
> On 26 Feb 2018, at 10:49, David Moner <dam...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Dear community,
&g
not
in favor of this solution.
Gerard Freriks
+31 620347088
gf...@luna.nl
Kattensingel 20
2801 CA Gouda
the Netherlands
> On 4 Dec 2017, at 01:14, Koray Atalag <k.ata...@auckland.ac.nz> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I couldn’t see any further discussions on the points Thomas raised –
to be
set fully.
Gerard Freriks
+31 620347088
gf...@luna.nl
Kattensingel 20
2801 CA Gouda
the Netherlands
> On 10 Nov 2017, at 15:49, Boštjan Lah <bostjan@marand.si> wrote:
>
>
>
>> On 10 Nov 2017, at 15:03, GF <gf...@luna.nl <mailto:gf...@luna.nl>> wr
to Templates but NOT Archetypes.
Gerard Freriks
+31 620347088
gf...@luna.nl
Kattensingel 20
2801 CA Gouda
the Netherlands
> On 10 Nov 2017, at 11:47, Bakke, Silje Ljosland
> <silje.ljosland.ba...@nasjonalikt.no> wrote:
>
> Crossposting this between the clinical and impleme
:
- The individual Itemresults are the result of a process and therefor
Observations (ENTRIES)
- The Panelresult is the result of an EVALUATION
Gerard Freriks
+31 620347088
gf...@luna.nl
Kattensingel 20
2801 CA Gouda
the Netherlands
> On 13 Jul 2017, at 21:19, Thomas Beale <thomas.be...@openehr.org&
an observable property? I think not. It is an aggregate,
an evaluation.
Gerard Freriks
+31 620347088
gf...@luna.nl
Kattensingel 20
2801 CA Gouda
the Netherlands
> On 6 Jun 2017, at 19:34, Bakke, Silje Ljosland
> <silje.ljosland.ba...@nasjonalikt.no> wrote:
>
> I agree
be possible to create one pattern that can deal with all kinds.
Gerard Freriks
+31 620347088
gf...@luna.nl
Kattensingel 20
2801 CA Gouda
the Netherlands
> On 6 Jun 2017, at 14:46, Vebjørn Arntzen <varnt...@ous-hf.no> wrote:
>
> Hi all
>
> To me a "questionnaire&quo
ECTION, ENTRY, CLUSTER) had better use LOINC.
Gerard Freriks
+31 620347088
gf...@luna.nl
Kattensingel 20
2801 CA Gouda
the Netherlands
> On 25 Apr 2017, at 11:51, William Goossen <wgoos...@results4care.nl> wrote:
>
> Many questions are in SNOMEDCT eg observable entities
> M
for as
results.
Gerard Freriks
+31 620347088
gf...@luna.nl
Kattensingel 20
2801 CA Gouda
the Netherlands
> On 25 Apr 2017, at 06:23, Pablo Pazos <pablo.pa...@cabolabs.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Bert,
>
> Maybe my wording is the issue here since I don't disagree with what you said.
&
: Special case of Evaluation. The process pertains to processes in the
Patient system.
Gerard Freriks
+31 620347088
gf...@luna.nl
Kattensingel 20
2801 CA Gouda
the Netherlands
> On 10 Apr 2017, at 09:10, Pablo Pazos <pablo.pa...@cabolabs.com> wrote:
>
> from ehr_im
>
>
I would say one needs both:
Evaluation: when calculating by the author the BMI-number using existing
weight/height data
Observation: when reading/copying by the author aa a BMI-result from a source
Gerard Freriks
+31 620347088
gf...@luna.nl
> On 10 Apr 2017, at 08:33, Bert Verhees <ber
archetype patterns.
The latter I prefer because data types I associate with the interface with
program languages. And there statistical result do not play a role.
Gerard Freriks
+31 620347088
gf...@luna.nl
Kattensingel 20
2801 CA Gouda
the Netherlands
> On 21 Mar 2017, at 08:21, Bakke, Si
Yes.
Any item in an archetype potentially has:
- an ad-hoc, locally defined, display name
- an official canonical name in a specific language domain
- and, in order to disambiguate it, an unique code in
- a specific terminology/classification domain
Gerard Freriks
+31 620347088
gf...@luna.nl
data'
Is the code used for defining the subject of associated data?
Or is the code used to define the data provided itself?
Gerard Freriks
+31 620347088
gf...@luna.nl
Kattensingel 20
2801 CA Gouda
the Netherlands
> On 15 Mar 2017, at 23:05, Sam Heard <sam.he...@oceaninformatics.com&
mas.be...@openehr.org> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 29/09/2016 13:31, GF wrote:
>> Each entry in the classification needs:
>> - a screen representation (‘+++')
>> - a description (‘moderate')
>
> in theory these two come from DV_ORDINAL.symbol, which is a DV_CODED_TEXT.
&g
classifications need to be mapped on a standardised internal
pattern/archetype for classifications. It is this pattern that is stored and
retrieved annex to the mapping to the local classification.
Gerard
> On 30 Sep 2016, at 10:06, Bert Verhees <bert.verh...@rosa.nl> wrote:
>
> On 29-
r.org> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 29/09/2016 12:58, GF wrote:
>> Is possible to define inclusion and exclusion criteria in the DV-Ordinal?
>>
>
> Gerard
>
> can you explain in more detail what you mean?
>
> -thomas
>
>
__
Is possible to define inclusion and exclusion criteria in the DV-Ordinal?
GF
> On 29 Sep 2016, at 09:00, Bakke, Silje Ljosland
> <silje.ljosland.ba...@nasjonalikt.no> wrote:
>
> Thanks for your replies everyone!
>
> Can the Any data type be constrained to DV_ORDINAL a
Thomas,
I agree.
In the Semantic Stack various layers are orthogonal and intersect.
The intersection between SNOMED Reference Terminologies and structures
(archetypes) is exactly at the righthand side of the ‘is’ relation.
Codes from SNOMED are ‘universals’, meaning definitions, like entries in
Daniel,
I agree with your opinions.
And observe - like you - differences where boundaries are drawn.
To me it is logical that there are differences because the scope of Bert is not
the same as the scope of OpenEHR or CIMI.
Bert’s scope is implementation in databases
OpenEHR -to me- is a mix
Processes have state models to indicate how they are (are not) executed.
When an investigation could not be done there must be an abnormal status
indicator and reason explaining why.
On other matter is the presence or absence of something.
Gerard
> On 14 jun. 2016, at 05:56, Heather Leslie
and epistomological
features of which one of them in Localisation in Time.
Gerard
> On 11 jun. 2016, at 16:37, Thomas Beale <thomas.be...@openehr.org> wrote:
>
> Gerard,
>
> in this scheme what does 'status' encode? Actual | future?
>
> - thomas
>
> On 11/06/2016 14:48, G
gt; knowledge about the patient), checking for a list being empty in some EMR
> system isn't at all the same thing. All that latter does is establish that no
> allergies have been recorded on this particular system.
>
> - thomas
>
> On 08/06/2016 07:54, GF wrote:
>>
>>
&g
Dear Colleagues,HL7 is thinking about the problem of negation. http://wiki.hl7.org/index.php?title=Negation_RequirementsThe group discussing it created a document with negation use cases.My questions are:- Can you let us know your reaction to this list of use cases?And- How should ‘negation’ be
47 matches
Mail list logo
