l *On
> Behalf Of *Bakke, Silje Ljosland
> *Sent:* Tuesday, January 8, 2019 2:53 PM
> *To:* For openEHR technical discussions <
> openehr-technical@lists.openehr.org>
> *Subject:* RE: DV_PROPORTION vs DV_QUANTITY for %
>
>
>
> I still don’t understand if we have a co
2019 2:53 PM
> *To:* For openEHR technical discussions <
> openehr-technical@lists.openehr.org>
> *Subject:* RE: DV_PROPORTION vs DV_QUANTITY for %
>
>
>
> I still don’t understand if we have a conclusion. And I don’t understand
> why proportion is the correct data type f
Anyone…? 😊
Regards,
Silje
From: openEHR-technical On Behalf
Of Bakke, Silje Ljosland
Sent: Tuesday, January 8, 2019 2:53 PM
To: For openEHR technical discussions
Subject: RE: DV_PROPORTION vs DV_QUANTITY for %
I still don’t understand if we have a conclusion. And I don’t understand why
discussions
Subject: Re: DV_PROPORTION vs DV_QUANTITY for %
Simple answer - loads of real data - pulse_oximetry and Oxygen levels will have
been recorded hundreds of thousands if not millions of times in patient data -
and Proportion *is* the correct datatype for O2 levels.
Ian
Dr Ian McNicoll
mobile
Simple answer - loads of real data - pulse_oximetry and Oxygen levels will
have been recorded hundreds of thousands if not millions of times in
patient data - and Proportion *is* the correct datatype for O2 levels.
Ian
Dr Ian McNicoll
mobile +44 (0)775 209 7859
office +44 (0)1536 414994
skype: ian
one thing to note: DV_PROPORTION is a more complex data structure. I
would be tempted to try to determine what use has been made of this
archetype so far - i.e. in creating real data. If no real data has been
created, then it could in theory be changed.
- thomas
On 07/01/2019 12:11, Ian McNic
gt;
> -Original Message-
> From: openEHR-technical On
> Behalf Of Thomas Beale
> Sent: Saturday, January 5, 2019 3:36 PM
> To: openehr-technical@lists.openehr.org
> Subject: Re: DV_PROPORTION vs DV_QUANTITY for %
>
>
> On 05/01/2019 12:56, Ian McNicoll wrote
-
From: openEHR-technical On Behalf
Of Thomas Beale
Sent: Saturday, January 5, 2019 3:36 PM
To: openehr-technical@lists.openehr.org
Subject: Re: DV_PROPORTION vs DV_QUANTITY for %
On 05/01/2019 12:56, Ian McNicoll wrote:
> There is a very clear use-case for having it there - O2 levels
&
On 05/01/2019 12:56, Ian McNicoll wrote:
There is a very clear use-case for having it there - O2 levels
variably and equivalently described a FiO2 which is a unitary
proportion or percent.
I think we need to keep it for that reason if no other.
So in that case we need to upgrade the documen
r?
>
> Regards,
> Silje
>
> -Original Message-
> From: openEHR-technical
> On Behalf Of Thomas Beale
> Sent: Friday, January 4, 2019 8:38 PM
> To: openehr-technical@lists.openehr.org
> Subject: Re: DV_PROPORTION vs DV_QUANTITY for %
>
>
> On 03/01/201
inal Message-
From: openEHR-technical On Behalf
Of Thomas Beale
Sent: Friday, January 4, 2019 8:38 PM
To: openehr-technical@lists.openehr.org
Subject: Re: DV_PROPORTION vs DV_QUANTITY for %
On 03/01/2019 08:37, David Moner wrote:
I think DV_QUANTITY is the option here. Someone could argue t
PM
To: openehr-technical@lists.openehr.org
Subject: Re: DV_PROPORTION vs DV_QUANTITY for %
On 03/01/2019 08:37, David Moner wrote:
> I think DV_QUANTITY is the option here. Someone could argue that % is
> not a proper unit, but it is, both in UCUM and SNOMED CT.
>
> DV_PROPORTION
On 03/01/2019 08:37, David Moner wrote:
I think DV_QUANTITY is the option here. Someone could argue that % is
not a proper unit, but it is, both in UCUM and SNOMED CT.
DV_PROPORTION should be only used when you want to maintain the
numerator and denominator explicitly separated, as a fractio
TITY.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> *Silje*
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *From:* openEHR-clinical *On
>>> Behalf Of *David Moner
>>> *Sent:* Thursday, January 3, 2019 9:37 AM
>>> *To:* For
r
>> *Sent:* Thursday, January 3, 2019 9:37 AM
>> *To:* For openEHR technical discussions <
>> openehr-technical@lists.openehr.org>
>> *Cc:* For openEHR clinical discussions (
>> openehr-clini...@lists.openehr.org)
>> *Subject:* Re: DV_PROPORTION vs DV_QUANT
(openehr-clini...@lists.openehr.org)
Subject: Re: DV_PROPORTION vs DV_QUANTITY for %
I think DV_QUANTITY is the option here. Someone could argue that % is not a
proper unit, but it is, both in UCUM and SNOMED CT.
DV_PROPORTION should be only used when you want to maintain the numerator and
I think DV_QUANTITY is the option here. Someone could argue that % is not a
proper unit, but it is, both in UCUM and SNOMED CT.
DV_PROPORTION should be only used when you want to maintain the numerator
and denominator explicitly separated, as a fraction, which should not be
the case with percentag
17 matches
Mail list logo
