It seems that the site
http://opensxce.org
is down. And I cannot find the test binaries for
Intel KMS. BTW, when one my systems starts
it shows a garbled screen and after a while
the system reboots. Now, Solaris 11.3 shows
exactly the same garbled screen but after a while
the screen is
> It seems that the site
>
>
> http://opensxce.org
>
> is down. And I cannot find the test binaries for Intel KMS.
It has been that way since the day of Martin's last email.
I understood that he had to power down the machine for a while.
We could have mirrored the testing binaries on the Wiki
OpenSXCE is hereby renamed to:
[OpenSXCE Ian Murdock Memorial Edition]
Update: It is impossible that he committed suicide.
They must have “taken him out”! Don't believe this nonsense!
I also doubt the authenticity of "his" "last" tweets.
One of his last comments on twitter was, that he will
Thanks Jonathan. You are absolutely right. Use your mailfilter! Can someone
hating Martins posts please explain to me why they DO NOT USE THIS FILTER? It
might be manhunting after all?
23 sep. 2014 schreef:
I'm sorry to even be involved in this discussion ...
My brother and his wife were
On 09/22/14 09:59 PM, Laurent Blume wrote:
I've yet to see anything about technology and not blatant politics or
insults in that thread.
What thread? You are inventing someting? This thread?
As I understand this blatant thread started when you misinterpreted
asking not to talk about world
You do not need a list administrator tot stop this disvussion. All YOU have to
do is shut up. Stop reacting. Don't try tot hide behind the back of someone
else just tot kick somebody off this list. Because it is nog about stopping
this conversation nut soms very narrow minded egos want to have
Wow! Obviously you don't know Martin, because he won't stop. Removing myself
from the mailing lists for OI.
On Tuesday, September 23, 2014 3:01 AM, Dick Hoogendijk d...@nagual.nl wrote:
You do not need a list administrator tot stop this disvussion. All YOU have to
do is shut up. Stop
On 23/09/14 22:41, G B via openindiana-discuss wrote:
Wow! Obviously you don't know Martin, because he won't stop.
This is precisely the point, and backed up by the evidence thus far.
It's also the reason why mailing lists and forums, generally, /have some
form of moderation presence to
Obviously, you don't know Martin. I've refrained from intervening in
those threads for what, more than one year now? Just because I also
hoped it would stop. It hasn't.
I don't want THIS discussion to be stopped. I would have liked it stated
that none will happen again.
But it is okay,
On 09/23/14 01:56 PM, Laurent Blume wrote:
Obviously, you don't know Martin. I've refrained from intervening in
those threads for what, more than one year now? Just because I also
hoped it would stop. It hasn't.
I think everyone refrained from answering actually. So what.
I don't want THIS
Too much for an operating system technical discussion. How sad OI has
devolved into this.
Theo was removed from his commit privileges to NetBSD for being rude to other
developers and users, yet OI won't remove someone from a mailing list for
irrational behavior?
On Tuesday, September 23,
I'm sorry to even be involved in this discussion ...
My brother and his wife were removed from viewing and accessing the Church
Facebook page in a nasty little spat.
2 people had a falling out, lets call them jack and jill, with jack
saying something in the heat of the moment by email.
jack was
On 09/23/14 08:05 AM, G B via openindiana-discuss wrote:
yet OI won't remove someone from a mailing list for irrational behavior?
Don't confuse neglect and lack of an active owner for someone consciously
deciding to continue the status quo. Is there anyone around who still
actively manages
On 24/09/14 03:25, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
On 09/23/14 08:05 AM, G B via openindiana-discuss wrote:
yet OI won't remove someone from a mailing list for irrational behavior?
Don't confuse neglect and lack of an active owner for someone consciously
deciding to continue the status quo. Is
Le 2014/09/20 11:15 +0200, Nikola M. a écrit:
On 09/15/14 11:20 AM, Krzysztof Grzempa wrote:
Well, for me it is mistake to mix up technology with politics. I respects
+1
only thing, we can't stop people doing that, we can only ask them to.
The off-topic traffic can and should most definitely
On 09/22/14 10:55 AM, Laurent Blume wrote:
Le 2014/09/20 11:15 +0200, Nikola M. a écrit:
On 09/15/14 11:20 AM, Krzysztof Grzempa wrote:
Well, for me it is mistake to mix up technology with politics. I
respects
+1
only thing, we can't stop people doing that, we can only ask them to.
The
Le 2014/09/22 19:38 +0200, Nikola M. a écrit:
Yes.
Only discriminating people for their political views (that they express,
beside talking on topic subjects) would be also unacceptable. (Beside we
generally don't want other politics then software ones).
If someone discuss something about
That was perfectly stated! And I completely agree that whoever is
administering the list needs to end it now.
On Monday, September 22, 2014 2:59 PM, Laurent Blume laurent...@elanor.org
wrote:
Le 2014/09/22 19:38 +0200, Nikola M. a écrit:
Yes.
Only discriminating people for their
Hi Apostolos
On 20/09/14 02:35, Apostolos Syropoulos via openindiana-discuss wrote:
I just wonder whether this is some sort of race or what? I you want to
contribute, OK do it. Otherwise, do not it and just let it go. It is
pointless to argue about nothing. A.S.
He's not going to contribute,
On 09/18/14 09:54 AM, Dave Koelmeyer wrote:
On 18/09/14 07:04, Nikola M. wrote:
So much of what he's posting is /so far wide/ of what's acceptable,
relevant, or appropriate I can only reasonably conclude you haven't
read any of it.
Yes I did, and people have wide variety of way of
On 09/20/14 08:23 AM, Dave Koelmeyer wrote:
Hi Apostolos
On 20/09/14 02:35, Apostolos Syropoulos via openindiana-discuss wrote:
I just wonder whether this is some sort of race or what? I you want
to contribute, OK do it. Otherwise, do not it and just let it go. It
is pointless to argue about
On 09/15/14 11:20 AM, Krzysztof Grzempa wrote:
Well, for me it is mistake to mix up technology with politics. I respects
+1
only thing, we can't stop people doing that, we can only ask them to.
___
openindiana-discuss mailing list
He certainly is NOT arguing about nothing imho. It is a very well
written piece of background information!
Apostolos Syropoulos via openindiana-discuss
mailto:openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
vrijdag 19 september 2014 16:35
Hello,
After reading this long message
I just wonder whether
On 20/09/2014 8:36 p.m., Nikola M. wrote:
I agree there could be more talking about OI and you are free to start
topic,
but I think OpenSXCE story is fully relevant to Openindiana in wider
sense.
Would this be the same story we've been hearing ad nauseum for months,
by any chance? That is,
HELLO: If *everyone* would simply *stop posting* to these threads, perhaps
they might die…
It was a mistake to have said anything at all about OpenSXCE on this list. I
had the best of intentions, but as the old saying goes, “The road to hell is
paved with good intentions.”
Peter had asked
Dave Koelmeyer dave.koelmeyer at davekoelmeyer.co.nz
Thu Sep 18 07:54:38 UTC 2014
wrote:
http://openindiana.org/pipermail/openindiana-discuss/2014-September/016425.html
So much of what he's posting is /so far wide/ of what's acceptable,
relevant, or appropriate I can only reasonably conclude
On 19/09/14 18:15, Martin Bochnig wrote:
Here a few facts:
OpenSXCE is not by any means based on OI or derived from OI.
Why, then, are you still here?
I_ensure_ you, that OI will never get a single line of my code,
I'm fairly sure you've said the same thing at least half a dozen times
Hello,
After reading this long message
You still didn't answer any of my questions.
And here are some more:
#0.) What do you think gives you the right, to speak for the overall
OI (or even OpenSolaris) community, especially in order EXCLUDE A
CONTRIBUTOR from it!??
... many many
No, it is the question of:
What gives somebody a SAY.
As a question of action, re-action and a sound mind this can only be
earlier contributions.
But as I see it, some folks seem to confuse this race of
contribution (that it quite naturally is), with shouting often enough
and LOUD enough.
I'm
On 18/09/14 07:04, Nikola M. wrote:
So much of what he's posting is /so far wide/ of what's acceptable,
relevant, or appropriate I can only reasonably conclude you haven't read
any of it.
What I don't need is some meandering post on how we should handle
differences of opinion. What I
On 09/16/14 10:37 AM, Dave Koelmeyer wrote:
On 16/09/14 18:58, Martin Bochnig wrote:
#0.) You want to stop something by continuing it?
I'd very much like you – when you claim you're going to unsubscribe –
to actually stick to it. Quite simply, you've become an incredible
distraction with
On 16/09/14 04:51, Dave Pooser wrote:
I think at this point discussion of OpenSXCE business plans, criticism of
the OpenSXCE community development, political discussions, and pretty much
any discussion of OpenSXCE (except in the context of features that would
be worth re-engineering for
#0.) You want to stop something by continuing it?
#1.) What's _YOUR_ contribution to OpenSolaris, be specific?
#2.) Ok, I got it. OI _really_ does not want to get any src from me.
Then those responsible for alienating me should provide a worthy
replacement by hacking OpenSXCE's functionality
On 16/09/14 18:58, Martin Bochnig wrote:
#0.) You want to stop something by continuing it?
I'd very much like you – when you claim you're going to unsubscribe – to
actually stick to it. Quite simply, you've become an incredible
distraction with these ongoing posts, and I'd like the
Yet another time you wrote something.
Something without technical content and of little if any relevance.
Reading help: I had stated repeatedly, that I needed to re-subscribe
in order to put a few things right, then unsubscribe again. As proof I
have the confirmation messages.
Also: Browse the
Hello,
I am not really following every detail of the OpenSXCE debate but I would
like to say that we are definitely a very small community and we cannot
afford to lose anyone who can contribute to the development of the operating
system and the desktop environment. In addition, since we are a
Apostolos Syropoulos via openindiana-discuss писал 16.09.2014 23:24:
Hello,
I am not really following every detail of the OpenSXCE debate but I
would
like to say that we are definitely a very small community and we cannot
afford to lose anyone who can contribute to the development of the
If sufficient documentation is available, I'd be willing to offer the two
SPARC systems I have as build systems, once I get working again. I'd have
to hang on to them, though...
I have a Sun Blade 2500 Red, as well as a Sun Fire V125, unfortunately they
are both only UltraSPARC III powered, would
As security concerns were brought onto the plate, as argument, I
would like to warn all my friends, fellows and really all of you:
Are you aware of this, btw?
http://cryptome.org/2013/12/Full-Disclosure.pdf
With detailed technical explanations and verifyable proof (I did not
test, because I
Well, for me it is mistake to mix up technology with politics. I respects
the right of having opinion (everybody has it right?) but I strongly belive
that it should be separate from technology blog where expectation was to
find technical data about the distro..
Well, if you decide to drop the
In weeks and months and YEARS nobody ever came who bought it from me.
That is, you blame evil users in your commercial fail. They all
conspired. Maybe in reality there is no demand for your product?
Give me everything you got
paid for your job from 2006 till 2014. NOW!
What is this? A
I think at this point discussion of OpenSXCE business plans, criticism of
the OpenSXCE community development, political discussions, and pretty much
any discussion of OpenSXCE (except in the context of features that would
be worth re-engineering for OpenIndiana) would all count as off-topic for
@Dmitry Kozhinov: You appear to be slightly confused.
Such community members like you make it easy for me to stop my efforts.
If you still didn't get it, or if you are new to Solaris: Everybody
who ever saw my CV (or who is a true OpenSolaris community member and
knows me for a decade) knows, that
For the LAST TIME: Leave me alone with Fucking Business Plans
So far every idiot could download it for free. Now I was forced to
stop these downloads, because of licensing advice.
Honest fair friends donated, the others just took it (500GB in August
alone, as my USA friend Al Hopper warned me).
It was a mistake to keep the site online.
Cordial thanks nevertheless to the few fellows, who have proven to be
true friends.
And although I wanted to publish the src long ago (and in fact did
contribute openly [in real-time openly] from 2005 till 2009), now
that's the final nail in the
http://openindiana.org/pipermail/oi-dev/2014-September/003355.html
[oi-dev] OpenSXCE It is illegal to sell without source code.
Nikola M. minikola at gmail.com
Sun Sep 14 19:13:42 UTC 2014
Well, you UNIX Admin who only works for $$$.
You damn person are beginning to make me REALLY DAMN ANGRY!
I really hesitated to post anything about OpenSXCE because I didn’t want to
open people up to another Martin-bashing contest. And immediately after
hitting the “Send” button, I had the thought, “I really should have sent that
privately to Peter.” But that thought came just a hair too late,
On 09/ 8/14 08:25 PM, Dormition Skete (Hotmail) wrote:
I really hesitated to post anything about OpenSXCE because I didn’t want to
open people up to another Martin-
Yeah, maybe that is the case, software and source and what is actually
being done, that people appreciate.
In my case main
On 06/ 5/13 01:01 AM, Christopher Chan wrote:
Yes, I think he has been banned or something. He twittered to that
effect if you check. The details for donating should be on the iso or
something.
I think I saw he ,like, unsubscribed himself. If he was banned, that
would be very bad and I think
Martin Bochnig martin at martux.org writes:
How to build stuff or packages?
As long as no sponsor helps us, maybe I never
release ANY src.
If you wish more people getting an interest in
your project, and to make your own development
cycle much easier, i suggest you to bake and
release
Great! Downloading now.
On 06/20/13 01:50 PM, ken mays wrote:
Greetings,
OpenSXCE2013.05 for SPARC EA was just RELEASED.
Notable achievements:
- Live DVD, Text, USB, and virtual HD versions
- Fully modernized PCI/USB device driver hardware data support for SPARC
platform
- Dtrace support
-
Greetings,
OpenSXCE2013.05 for SPARC EA was just RELEASED.
Notable achievements:
- Live DVD, Text, USB, and virtual HD versions
- Fully modernized PCI/USB device driver hardware data support for SPARC
platform
- Dtrace support
- QEMU/KVM 1.5.0 support
- LDOM server virtualization and
On 20/06/2013 18:50, ken mays wrote:
Greetings,
OpenSXCE2013.05 for SPARC EA was just RELEASED.
Notable achievements:
- Live DVD, Text, USB, and virtual HD versions
- Fully modernized PCI/USB device driver hardware data support for SPARC
platform
- Dtrace support
- QEMU/KVM 1.5.0
Yes, I think he has been banned or something. He twittered to that
effect if you check. The details for donating should be on the iso or
something.
On Wednesday, June 05, 2013 05:55 AM, Jonathan Adams wrote:
I get the impression, from another thread, that he might not be getting
messages from
1. *Martin Bochnig* @*MartinBochnig* https://twitter.com/MartinBochnig
2h https://twitter.com/MartinBochnig/status/341657908557271040
FREETARDS
* Expand *
https://twitter.com/MartinBochnig/status/341657908557271040
2. [image: Martin Bochnig] *Martin Bochnig*
So, how would I go about installing OpenSXCE on a T1000? Is there some
sort of jumpstart available for it?
In the past, I've attempted to hook up a SATA DVD drive to my T1000, but
I couldn't get it booting, even after messing with the openboot-prom
devaliases.
On 02/10/2013 04:33 PM, Ray Arachelian wrote:
So, how would I go about installing OpenSXCE on a T1000? Is there some
sort of jumpstart available for it?
In the past, I've attempted to hook up a SATA DVD drive to my T1000, but
I couldn't get it booting, even after messing with the
On 02/10/2013 10:33 PM, Ray Arachelian wrote:
So, how would I go about installing OpenSXCE on a T1000? Is there some
sort of jumpstart available for it?
In the past, I've attempted to hook up a SATA DVD drive to my T1000, but
I couldn't get it booting, even after messing with the
You can set up an automated installer on a laptop with OpenIndiana and have it
point to OpenSXCE image in the drive...then on the T1000 boot menu do a boot
net install. You can also do HD image installs.
--
On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 5:01 PM EST Ray Arachelian wrote:
Dear community,
I'm posting this from an Internet Cafe.
Did everything work for you?
As I just saw in my Inbox, I have been told that on some boxes there is an ugly
cosmetical bug with icewm's background image.
This sounds like endianness related (depending on which gfx
card/driver you use).
On 02/07/2013 02:17 PM, Martin Bochnig wrote:
Dear community,
I'm posting this from an Internet Cafe.
Hi Martin, great to hear from you again!
Did everything work for you?
I'm currently getting the SPARC build farm for Illumos up and running.
So far, your distro is running like a champ, no
61 matches
Mail list logo
