Re: "Internal review ID : 9062887" (Re: FXMLLoader: not supplying filename to script engine, not supplying event object as argument to script

Hi Kevin, On 29.01.2020 13:24, Kevin Rushforth wrote: > The RFE you filed is now available here: > > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8238080 thank you very much! Cheers ---rony P.S.: Have not received any automatic notification e-mail so far.

Re: "Internal review ID : 9062887" (Re: FXMLLoader: not supplying filename to script engine, not supplying event object as argument to script

Hi Rony, The RFE you filed is now available here: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8238080 -- Kevin On 1/25/2020 6:32 AM, Rony G. Flatscher wrote: Hi Kevin, On 24.01.2020 16:50, Kevin Rushforth wrote: This bug was transferred to the JDK project on 28-Nov-2019. I don't know why you

Re: "Internal review ID : 9062887" (Re: FXMLLoader: not supplying filename to script engine, not supplying event object as argument to script

Hi Kevin, On 24.01.2020 16:50, Kevin Rushforth wrote: > This bug was transferred to the JDK project on 28-Nov-2019. I don't know why > you didn't get an > email at that time, but I will inquire of the team who processes incoming > bugs. > > Also, I'll keep an eye out for the RFE you filed today,

Re: "Internal review ID : 9062887" (Re: FXMLLoader: not supplying filename to script engine, not supplying event object as argument to script

Hi Rony, This bug was transferred to the JDK project on 28-Nov-2019. I don't know why you didn't get an email at that time, but I will inquire of the team who processes incoming bugs. Also, I'll keep an eye out for the RFE you filed today, and let you know when it is transferred in case ther

Re: "Internal review ID : 9062887" (Re: FXMLLoader: not supplying filename to script engine, not supplying event object as argument to script

On 23.01.2020 18:09, Anthony Vanelverdinghe wrote: > On 22/01/2020 18:52, Rony G. Flatscher wrote: ... cut ... >> Maybe one more question: there would be an optimization possible by >> compiling scripts for script >> engines that have the javax.script.Compilable interface implemented and use >> t

Re: "Internal review ID : 9062887" (Re: FXMLLoader: not supplying filename to script engine, not supplying event object as argument to script

On 22/01/2020 18:52, Rony G. Flatscher wrote: Hi Anthony, On 22.01.2020 17:07, Anthony Vanelverdinghe wrote: Your issue has been converted into a JDK issue, with your testcase attached [1]. Thank you *very* much for this information! Normally you should’ve received an e-mail at the time of

Re: "Internal review ID : 9062887" (Re: FXMLLoader: not supplying filename to script engine, not supplying event object as argument to script

Hi Anthony, On 22.01.2020 17:07, Anthony Vanelverdinghe wrote: > Your issue has been converted into a JDK issue, with your testcase attached > [1]. Thank you *very* much for this information! > Normally you should’ve received an e-mail at the time of this conversion, Just searched all my e-mai

RE: "Internal review ID : 9062887" (Re: FXMLLoader: not supplying filename to script engine, not supplying event object as argument to script

enjfx-dev@openjdk.java.net> Subject: Re: "Internal review ID : 9062887" (Re: FXMLLoader: not supplying filename to script engine, not supplying event object as argument to script Last November I submitted an appropriate bug report and mailed the testcase on November 27th per Or

Re: "Internal review ID : 9062887" (Re: FXMLLoader: not supplying filename to script engine, not supplying event object as argument to script

Last November I submitted an appropriate bug report and mailed the testcase on November 27th per Oracle's request without hearing anything to this date. Therefore I was wondering how long such an assessment usually takes place and what to do? (Maybe it "fell off the desk" due to the end-of-year

Re: "Internal review ID : 9062887" (Re: FXMLLoader: not supplying filename to script engine, not supplying event object as argument to script

As the zip-archive attachment got stripped, for a brief time the zip-archive can be fetched from . ---rony On 21.11.2019 15:29, Rony G. Flatscher wrote: > On 15.11.2019 16:08, Rony G. Flatscher wrote: >> On 14.11

"Internal review ID : 9062887" (Re: FXMLLoader: not supplying filename to script engine, not supplying event object as argument to script

On 15.11.2019 16:08, Rony G. Flatscher wrote: > On 14.11.2019 22:57, Kevin Rushforth wrote: >> On 11/14/2019 10:12 AM, Rony G. Flatscher wrote: >>> On 14.11.2019 16:34, Rony G. Flatscher wrote: On 13.11.2019 19:50, Kevin Rushforth wrote: > On 11/13/2019 9:42 AM, Rony G. Flatscher wrote: >>

Re: Ad NashornScriptEngine (Re: FXMLLoader: not supplying filename to script engine, not supplying event object as argument to script

On 14.11.2019 22:57, Kevin Rushforth wrote: > On 11/14/2019 10:12 AM, Rony G. Flatscher wrote: >> On 14.11.2019 16:34, Rony G. Flatscher wrote: >>> On 13.11.2019 19:50, Kevin Rushforth wrote: On 11/13/2019 9:42 AM, Rony G. Flatscher wrote: >> ... cut ... > To reproduce the testcase one w

Re: Ad NashornScriptEngine (Re: FXMLLoader: not supplying filename to script engine, not supplying event object as argument to script

On 11/14/2019 10:12 AM, Rony G. Flatscher wrote: On 14.11.2019 16:34, Rony G. Flatscher wrote: On 13.11.2019 19:50, Kevin Rushforth wrote: On 11/13/2019 9:42 AM, Rony G. Flatscher wrote: ... cut ... To reproduce the testcase one would need ooRexx and the Java bridge BSF4ooRexx (all openso

Re: Ad NashornScriptEngine (Re: FXMLLoader: not supplying filename to script engine, not supplying event object as argument to script

On 14.11.2019 16:34, Rony G. Flatscher wrote: > On 13.11.2019 19:50, Kevin Rushforth wrote: >> On 11/13/2019 9:42 AM, Rony G. Flatscher wrote: ... cut ... >>> To reproduce the testcase one would need ooRexx and the Java bridge >>> BSF4ooRexx (all opensource) for >>> which I could come up with a zi

Correct diff (Re: FXMLLoader: not supplying filename to script engine, not supplying event object as argument to script

Just for the record: attached the wrong diff, so attaching the correct one to this posting. Sorry for the confusion. ---rony On 13.11.2019 15:14, Rony G. Flatscher wrote: > Hmm, not getting any feedback so far, so wondering if there are currently any > Java developers who > take advantage of t

Ad NashornScriptEngine (Re: FXMLLoader: not supplying filename to script engine, not supplying event object as argument to script

On 13.11.2019 19:50, Kevin Rushforth wrote: > > On 11/13/2019 9:42 AM, Rony G. Flatscher wrote: >> Will come up with a short reproducible testcase in ooRexx with brief >> comments such that the testcase >> could be understood without the runtime (ooRexx reads almost like >> pseudo-code). >> >> To

Re: FXMLLoader: not supplying filename to script engine, not supplying event object as argument to script

On 11/13/2019 9:42 AM, Rony G. Flatscher wrote: Will come up with a short reproducible testcase in ooRexx with brief comments such that the testcase could be understood without the runtime (ooRexx reads almost like pseudo-code). To reproduce the testcase one would need ooRexx and the Java bri

Re: FXMLLoader: not supplying filename to script engine, not supplying event object as argument to script

On 13.11.2019 16:53, Kevin Rushforth wrote: > Actually, in this case, sending an email to this list is the right way to > start this discussion. I > had meant to reply last week, but was out of town (at Devoxx), and busy with > other things. > > Before we take a look at a patch that implements wh

Re: FXMLLoader: not supplying filename to script engine, not supplying event object as argument to script

Actually, in this case, sending an email to this list is the right way to start this discussion. I had meant to reply last week, but was out of town (at Devoxx), and busy with other things. Before we take a look at a patch that implements what you propose to change, we need a little more infor

Re: FXMLLoader: not supplying filename to script engine, not supplying event object as argument to script

On 13.11.2019 15:40, Michael Paus wrote: > have you considered directly contributing your proposed change via a PR on > ? According to my experience this may speed > up things considerably but don't forget to follow the procedures as outlined > in >

Re: FXMLLoader: not supplying filename to script engine, not supplying event object as argument to script

Hi, have you considered directly contributing your proposed change via a PR on ? According to my experience this may speed up things considerably but don't forget to follow the procedures as outlined in .

Re: FXMLLoader: not supplying filename to script engine, not supplying event object as argument to script

Hmm, not getting any feedback so far, so wondering if there are currently any Java developers who take advantage of the ability of FXMLLoader to have FXML controllers implemented in any of the Java javax.script languages? For those, who use scripting languages for FXML controllers the request th

FXMLLoader: not supplying filename to script engine, not supplying event object as argument to script

Using a script engine (javax.script.ScriptEngine) for implementing a FXML controller there are two important information missing in the ScriptContext.ENGINE_SCOPE Bindings supplied to the script used to eval() the script code: * ScriptEngine.FILENAME o This value denotes the file name fr