Hi,
I cannot find a way to replace a section of ObservableList in one
operation. I'm looking for something like
ObservableList#setAll(int from, int to, Collection col)
or
list.subList(from, to).setAll(col).
In the latter case, ObservableList#subList() would have to return an
instance of Observ
Hi Tom,
> I don't think there's API for this so the only idea is to copy the list
> to an ArrayList, do the replace there and afterwards call
> ObservableList#setAll().
yes, that solves the problem of generating just a single change, but
the change is unnecessarily big.
Martin, thanks for openin
Hi,
does anyone know of a way to make a specific ListView item visible,
but don't scroll the ListView at all if the item is already in the
viewport?
I am working on a code editor, displaying lines in a ListView.
Whenever the caret moves up/down, I want to bring the current line to
the viewport.
Hi all,
I implemented a text control that supports assigning style classes to
portions of text. It is meant to be used for syntax highlighting.
https://github.com/TomasMikula/CodeAreaFX
The code is based on the original TextArea code. This implies the
license to be GPLv2 with the Classpath Excep
n the
OpenJFX code, so I guess I'm stuck with GPLv2 with Classpath
Exception.
Best,
Tomas
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 7:48 AM, Tomas Mikula wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I implemented a text control that supports assigning style classes to
>> portion
community and from my own needs. I'm open to feedback
and suggestions.
Regards,
Tomas
>
> Keep up the great work and be sure to keep me in the loop of your
> progress :-)
>
> -- Jonathan
>
> On 8/10/2013 2:48 a.m., Tomas Mikula wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I imple
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 11:58 AM, John Hendrikx wrote:
> Hm, I found it googling, and since it showed up here:
>
> http://docs.oracle.com/javafx/2/api/javafx/scene/Scene.ScenePulseListener.html
>
> I figured it was public, but I just noticed the class is defined package
> private.
Although not par
ed as an argument to it's method).
>
> When it's not a property you want to recompute, but an internal state (you
> use to setup the children), layoutChildren() should be the method for you.
>
> -Martin
>
>
> On 11/07/2013 02:08 PM, Tomas Mikula wrote:
>&g
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 3:34 PM, Martin Sladecek
wrote:
> On 11/07/2013 03:18 PM, Tomas Mikula wrote:
>>
>> Hi Martin,
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 2:32 PM, Martin Sladecek
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> This is something different. When properties depe
Good to know that the problems I described don't apply to your use case.
Regards,
Tomas
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 5:28 PM, John Hendrikx wrote:
> On 7/11/2013 14:08, Tomas Mikula wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 11:58 AM, John Hendrikx wrote:
>>>
>>>
2013 at 8:55 PM, Martin Sladecek
wrote:
> On 11/07/2013 04:03 PM, Tomas Mikula wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 3:34 PM, Martin Sladecek
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 11/07/2013 03:18 PM, Tomas Mikula wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi Martin,
&
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 1:28 PM, Philipp Dörfler wrote:
> I see the need to be aware of the area that is covered by fingers rather
> than just considering that area's center point.
> I'd guess that this adds a new layer of complexity, though. For instance:
> Say we have a button on some background
I just came across a strange case when these two are not equivalent.
Maybe that is no surprise to you, but it was to me. The case I
stumbled upon most likely has to do with ListView internals.
Substitute
a := ListView.widthProperty()
b := ListCell.prefWidthProperty()
and the code that demonstrate
I guess my main question is: should I file a bug on ListView?
Tomas
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 8:15 PM, Tomas Mikula wrote:
> I just came across a strange case when these two are not equivalent.
> Maybe that is no surprise to you, but it was to me. The case I
> stumbled upon most likely
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 10:04 PM, Tomas Mikula wrote:
> Hi,
>
> does anyone know of a way to make a specific ListView item visible,
> but don't scroll the ListView at all if the item is already in the
> viewport?
I will answer my question from months ago:
I have to dig up
Hello,
I just published a small extension of javafx bindings and properties
that can help you reduce redundant recalculations.
They provide two additional methods:
public void block();
public void release();
Call p.block() when you suspect your actions will lead to multiple
invalidations of p,
etHeight();
relaxedArea.release();
Only one change of relaxedArea is emitted.
Best,
Tomas
>
> Are there helpers for this sort of situation? Are there guidelines in the
> JavaFX docs somewhere?
>
> Regards,
>
> Scott
>
>
> On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 11:54 PM, Tomas Mi
On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 8:30 PM, John Hendrikx wrote:
> Since you are only allowed to modify properties on the JavaFX thread (in
> most cases), I've been using Platform.runLater() to make sure I observe only
> complete changes.
>
> Basically I register an InvalidationListener on the properties tha
try block.
Regards,
Tomas
>
>
> Scott
>
>
>
> On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 6:57 PM, Tomas Mikula
> wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 11:49 PM, Tomas Mikula
>> wrote:
>> > On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 6:39 PM, Scott Palmer
>> > wrote:
>>
> On 2013-12-16 0:39, Scott Palmer wrote:
>>
>> Good stuff! This is the sort of thing that might make a good
>> contribution
>> to extend the standard Bindings class.
>>
>> Scott
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 5:49 PM, Toma
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 12:17 PM, Tomas Mikula wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 7:56 AM, Tom Eugelink wrote:
>>
>> I understand what you are trying to do. I was wondering if a more coarse
>> grained approach would be preferable, so a central registration of whether
>>
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 1:47 AM, Tomas Mikula wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 1:07 AM, Scott Palmer wrote:
>> Interesting, no worse than John's pattern though.
>> I thought of using a try/finally to make sure release was called and that
>> naturally lead to thinking of
have inadvertently started down that path :-).
>
> Richard
>
> On Dec 16, 2013, at 8:09 AM, Tomas Mikula wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 1:47 AM, Tomas Mikula wrote:
>>> On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 1:07 AM, Scott Palmer wrote:
>>>> Interesting, no w
hen.
>
> --
> best regards,
> Anthony
>
>
> On 12/13/2013 11:17 PM, Tomas Mikula wrote:
>>
>> I guess my main question is: should I file a bug on ListView?
>>
>> Tomas
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 8:15 PM, Tomas Mikula
>> wrote:
>>&
ive programming
>> (http://lampwww.epfl.ch/~imaier/pub/DeprecatingObserversTR2010.pdf) with
>> JavaFX properties using Java 8 lambdas and streams would be quite
>> interesting and perhaps very useful.
>>
>> John
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: openjfx-dev-boun.
nets.
Regards,
Tomas
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 8:24 AM, Tomas Mikula wrote:
> I had a quick look at Java 8 streams and I'm afraid they are of no use
> for reactive programming. The fundamental problem is that in
> java.util.stream, computation is driven by the stream consumer, rat
will be coming in the next
year, so you can start hacking your rich-text editor now.
Regards,
Tomas
[1] https://github.com/TomasMikula/CodeAreaFX
On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 1:39 AM, Tomas Mikula wrote:
> Thanks, Jonathan.
>
> On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 9:08 PM, Jonathan Giles
> wrot
Interesting ideas. I'm wondering, do you switch skins often enough that you
are worried about performance (and thus care about reusability of skins)?
Because I don't see how reusability of skins saves you lines of code -
whether the code is in the constructor or in the initialize() method, it is
th
On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 4:26 PM, John Hendrikx wrote:
> On 7/01/2014 14:50, Tomas Mikula wrote:
>
>> Interesting ideas. I'm wondering, do you switch skins often enough that
>> you are worried about performance (and thus care about reusability of
>> skins)? Because I
+1. I ended up creating such property subclasses myself, too. And I don't
provide the static getClassCssMetaData() either.
Tomas
On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 7:05 AM, Tom Eugelink wrote:
>
> Yes, I had similar considerations. I was thinking about providing exactly
> such extended Property classes in
On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 10:56 PM, John Hendrikx wrote:
> On 7/01/2014 18:11, Tomas Mikula wrote:
>
> With a non-reusable skin, dispose is pretty much just removing the
> listeners. With a reusable instance, I suspect there is more work to reset
> the state of the instance
;>>
>>> obj.setWidth(w);
>>> obj.setHeight(h);
>>>
>>> and have only ONE recalculation of the area property happen. Currently
>>> the
>>> way bindings work the area will be calculated twice. The intermediate
>>> calculation is reall
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 11:27 AM, Tom Schindl
wrote:
> On 22.01.14 11:07, Martin Sladecek wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > I would like to start discussion about an addition to API in Observable,
> > ObservableValue and all Observable collections.
> > There were multiple requests for a way how to avoid dupl
Hi Randahl,
I'm curious about an example where you would take advantage of the behavior
where multiple addListener(listener) calls add the listener just once.
Anyway, here [1] are helper classes InvalidationSubscriber and
ChangeSubscriber that allow you to do that:
InvalidationSubscriber subscri
There is no official API for this, right?
>
> Randahl
>
>
>
>
>
> On 22 Jan 2014, at 13:34, Tomas Mikula wrote:
>
> Hi Randahl,
>
> I'm curious about an example where you would take advantage of the
> behavior where multiple addListener(listener) call
>
> I know we can write removeListener(ourListener) followed by
> addListener(ourListener), and while that would work, I would much rather
> have the listener list ensure that there are no duplicates, since I believe
> that it is always a bug to register the same listener twice.
Hi list,
I put together a prototype of a rich-text editor based on CodeAreaFX:
https://github.com/TomasMikula/CodeAreaFX#2-rich-text-editor
Regards,
Tomas
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 7:47 PM, Tomas Mikula wrote:
> I made a bunch of improvements to CodeArea [1], most notably two:
> 1
g and perhaps very useful.
>
> John
>
> -Original Message-
> From: openjfx-dev-boun...@openjdk.java.net [mailto:
> openjfx-dev-boun...@openjdk.java.net] On Behalf Of Tomas Mikula
> Sent: Monday, December 16, 2013 9:19 AM
> To: Richard Bair
> Cc: openjfx-dev@openjdk
Hi all,
I just published a general-purpose undo manager for JavaFX.
https://github.com/TomasMikula/UndoFX
I've been using it for a while in CodeAreaFX and thought it would be useful
to release it separately.
Best regards,
Tomas
Hi John,
I'm replying to your question from JIRA:
> Is there perhaps a better place to hook into when you want to have a
> chance to update the layout as a result of deferred property changes?
I took your example and modified it:
https://gist.github.com/TomasMikula/6c5d97edc51ec8fa3d9e
Perhaps
Hi all,
I just want to quickly inform that all my JavaFX-related projects,
ReactFX [1], UndoFX [2] and RichTextFX [3] (previously known as
CodeAreaFX), now have snapshots deployed to the Sonatype OSS
repository.
[1] http://www.reactfx.org
[2] https://github.com/TomasMikula/UndoFX
[3] https://gith
I started FXMisc (www.fxmisc.org) to help developers get their project
artifacts to Sonatype/Maven repositories under
'org.fxmisc.yourproject' groupId.
If you
* don't think that your project deserves a dedicated domain name (yet);
* find 'org.fxmisc.yourproject' more appealing than
'com.github.y
Hi Jeanette,
before reimplementing the whole thing, please check out my writeup of some
use cases [1] and whether WellBehavedFX would serve your needs.
Best,
Tomas
[1]
http://htmlpreview.github.io/?https://github.com/TomasMikula/InputMapAPI/blob/master/use-cases.html
On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 5:4
What about forgetting the whole notion of a "default button" and the only
effect of setting the default property to true being that the button will
start as focused?
So I add a question:
3) Would anyone miss the "default button"?
Tomas
On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 5:47 PM, Jonathan Giles
wrote:
> H
On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 6:10 PM, Michael Berry wrote:
> On 7 June 2016 at 23:04, Tomas Mikula wrote:
>
>> What about forgetting the whole notion of a "default button" and the only
>> effect of setting the default property to true being that the button will
>>
On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 6:33 PM, Stefan Fuchs wrote:
> Hi,
>
> well, if my dialog would include a TextField, an cancel- and an
> ok-button, I would obviously want to have the TextField the initial focus.
>
> Once the dialog opens I can immediately type some text.
> When I'm done, I hit enter to c
On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 6:48 PM, Michael Berry wrote:
> On 7 June 2016 at 23:30, Tomas Mikula wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 6:10 PM, Michael Berry wrote:
>>
>>> On 7 June 2016 at 23:04, Tomas Mikula wrote:
>>>
>>>> What abo
On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 7:08 PM, Michael Berry wrote:
> On 7 June 2016 at 23:57, Tomas Mikula wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 6:48 PM, Michael Berry wrote:
>>
>>> On 7 June 2016 at 23:30, Tomas Mikula wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>
Felix,
I'm sure the JavaFX engineers are the first ones who wish that Oracle
invested more resources in JavaFX. Therefore I'm afraid that the anger is
targeted at the wrong crowd here.
Tomas
On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 8:52 AM, Felix Bembrick
wrote:
> OK, I have learned my lesson - I will be caref
I think what Tom proposes makes sense even regardless of Java 9. Another
benefit is not requiring a no-arg constructor.
Regards,
Tomas
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 5:19 AM, Tom Schindl
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was playing around with Java9 a bit yesterday things worked fine but
> what disturbs me a bit is
ease) if
> there were enough interest in doing this.
>
> -- Kevin
>
>
>
> Tomas Mikula wrote:
>
> I think what Tom proposes makes sense even regardless of Java 9. Another
> benefit is not requiring a no-arg constructor.
>
> Regards,
> Tomas
>
> On Tue, Jun 21, 201
Hi everyone,
since I don't work with JavaFX (or GUI applications, or that matter)
anymore, it is hard for me to keep up with the maintenance of my JavaFX
projects. I am therefore looking for new maintainers (and possibly new
home) of my most active JavaFX project, RichTextFX (
https://github.com/T
Hi all,
I just released EasyBind (http://www.fxmisc.org/easybind/), a tiny
library with several factory methods to create bindings using lambdas.
The most prominent feature is probably the type-safe select binding
based on this feature request for JavaFX 9:
https://javafx-jira.kenai.com/browse/RT-
The suspicious thing about your solution is that your smart
implementation of equals() is not symmetric.
In case the observable value is visible only within your project, you
could do this:
interface Subscription {
void unsubscribe();
}
class MyObservableValue implements Obse
Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 2:07 PM, Tomas Mikula wrote:
> The suspicious thing about your solution is that your smart
> implementation of equals() is not symmetric.
>
> In case the observable value is visible only within your project, you
> could do this:
>
> interface Subscrip
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 8:53 PM, Tom Schindl
wrote:
> Hi Richard,
>
> Coming back to this old thread and now that we are using lamdas all over
> I guess we could take one more look into that.
>
> I've prototyped an initial version by introducing a new internal type
> named InvalidatedSimpleObjectP
jects do not live in the same
> HashSet/Map …. for sure - but why should they?
>
> @Override
> public boolean equals(Object obj)
> {
> return obj == delegate; // && this == obj
> }
>
> @Override
> public int hashCode()
> {
>
her) method.
>
>
> Am 22.03.2014 um 15:55 schrieb Tomas Mikula :
>
> Hi Mario,
>
> even if your proposal gets accepted, you would still depend on an
> implementation detail of JavaFX, which is always good to avoid.
>
> To sum up, my second proposal compared to your cur
.
Tomas
>
> Tom
>
> Von meinem iPhone gesendet
>
>> Am 22.03.2014 um 16:23 schrieb Tom Schindl :
>>
>> Why not i expect the property to be fully initialize so this would be a
>> breaking change in behavior.
>>
>> Tom
>>
>> Von meinem
Hi all,
I just want to quickly inform that I have a post on how to defer
processing of user input until the user has been inactive for a
certain amount of time.
http://tomasmikula.github.io/blog/2014/03/22/trigger-processing-after-a-period-of-inactivity.html
Best regards,
Tomas
ke a transparent proxy.
>>>
>>> Even if this breaks the equals paradigm, in this special case I can
>>> perfectly live with an equals/hashCode implementation like this below.
>>> It won’t break your app; as long as both objects do not live in the same
>&
are other risks too.
> I am pretty well aware about stuff like that.
>
>
> PS: I would love to explain in detail why I decorate change listener, but
> this is out of scope of this thread.
>
> Regards,
> Mario
>
>
> Am 24.03.2014 um 14:04 schrieb Tomas Mikula :
EasyBind [1] now adds monadic operations on ObservableValue:
http://tomasmikula.github.io/blog/2014/03/26/monadic-operations-on-observablevalue.html
[1] http://www.fxmisc.org/easybind/
Hello all,
I would like to announce that I have published LiveDirsFX [1], which
is a combination of a directory watcher, a directory-tree model
(usable in TreeView) and a simple asynchronous I/O facility.
The added value of this combination, compared to using them all
separately, is this:
1. The
Hi Tom,
it seems to me that in your custom DoubleBinding implementation
`other` is not its dependency, thus it does not react to it's
invalidations.
Tomas
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 9:25 PM, Tom Eugelink wrote:
> I came up with this:
>
> startXProperty().bind( *snap(*heightProperty().multiply(0.2)
ide
> public ObservableList getDependencies() {
> return FXCollections.singletonObservableList(value);
> }
> };
>
> }
>
>
>
> On 2014-5-21 21:34, Tomas Mikula wrote:
>>
>> Hi Tom,
>>
>> it seems to me that
eBinding.
EasyBind is at http://www.fxmisc.org/easybind/
Tomas
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 9:47 PM, Tomas Mikula wrote:
> Yeah, and you could also eliminate "Observable... dependencies" from
> snap's signature, since now you are not using them to invalidate your
> binding.
>
>
Hi Tom,
I am in favor of the menu being a PopupWindow, but alternatively,
could your "canvas" be a Group instead of a Pane?
The code would look like this:
StackPane stack = new StackPane();
Group canvas = new Group();
canvas.setManaged(false);
stack.setOnMousePressed(e -> {
t mysterious how those MenuItems get
> rendered. I would expect maybe a skin, but I'm not finding it.
>
>
> On 2014-6-9 13:48, Tomas Mikula wrote:
>
>> Hi Tom,
>>
>> I am in favor of the menu being a PopupWindow, but alternatively,
>> could your "canvas&quo
heers,
Tomas
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 1:45 PM, Tomas Mikula wrote:
> What about using Popup, which is a subclass of PopupWindow? You just need to
> populate its content
>
> popup.getContent().addAll(Node...);
>
> and then show it at the right position, relative to any node
>
#x27;t Popup remove the need for a stackpane?
>
> Tom
>
>
>
>
> On 2014-6-10 15:38, Tomas Mikula wrote:
>>
>> Since talk is cheap, I slightly reworked your code (not using
>> PopupWindow) and it seems to work.
>>
>> CircularPopupMenu:
>>
>&g
.
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 3:57 PM, Tomas Mikula wrote:
> Just because I wanted to make minimal changes to your code, which was
> already using StackPane. Yes, Popup would remove the need for a
> StackPane.
>
> On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 3:52 PM, Tom Eugelink wrote:
>>
>>
could of course...
>> Uncertain about that.
>>
>> Anyhow, the only remaining problem is hiding when the mouse exits. Stage
>> does not send the mouse events to addEventFilter. The node.addEventFilter
>> does not solve that and on scene I'm not getting the events eithe
Hi Randahl,
you should override your Skin's dispose() method that removes the label.
Possible reasons I can imagine why JavaFX does not clear the child list itself:
1. The control could have some children on it's own, which shouldn't
be deleted when applying a skin. This will be the case for a co
Hi Randahl,
I think the general advice is to avoid subclassing controls if
possible. You can create your custom control that embeds a text field
and filter events on your custom control so they never reach the
embedded text field.
Tomas
On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 10:11 AM, Randahl Fink Isaksen
wro
Hi all,
I would like to briefly inform about the recent additions in
RichTextFX [1]. RichTextFX is a text area that supports styled text.
Its original goal is to support code editing. To this end, it now
features:
1) Displaying line numbers and, more generally, any graphic in front
of each line.
Nice!
On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 6:09 PM, Mike Hearn wrote:
> I have what I imagine is a fairly typical JavaFX application (once it's
> released I'll post more about it). It has a GUI, some mostly asynchronous
> state management, and interactions with various servers that can change the
> apps state
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 1:16 PM, Mike Hearn wrote:
> Thanks Tomas! I'm a big fan of your work and blog.
>
> I learned about ReactFX after I started writing my current project, seems
> like a very useful abstraction indeed, although so far I've found the basic
> JFX stuff to be nearly sufficient (a
What about
tab.selectedProperty().addListener((obs, old, selected) -> {
if(selected) {
service.restart();
} else {
service.cancel();
}
});
?
Best,
Tomas
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 9:07 AM, Peter Penzov wrote:
> Hi All,
>I have a TabPane
d to implement this?
>
> BR,
> Peter
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 1:22 PM, Tomas Mikula
> wrote:
>>
>> What about
>>
>> tab.selectedProperty().addListener((obs, old, selected) -> {
>> if(selec
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 12:51 AM, Tomas Mikula wrote:
> I'm not sure I understand: you have many service subclasses, each of
> them associated with a tab? If so, they can take the tab as an
> argument to the constructor:
>
> abstract class TabService extends Service {
If you are interested in the preferred height, prefHeight(-1) should
get you what you want. If this is before the first layout pass takes
place, you will also want to call applyCss() before prefHeight(-1).
Note: prefHeight(-1) is what autosize() calls internally, but it does
not call applyCss().
On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 9:01 PM, Sean True wrote:
> We've been looking at very large tables for use in data grid display.
>
> Row count scales very nicely indeed, but column count is much more
> problematic.
To explain your observation: TableView is based on VirtualFlow, which
optimizes the numbe
ld appreciate adding your specific use case to my suite of
> tests.
>
> Thanks,
>
> -- Jonathan
>
>
> On 15/08/2014 10:35 a.m., Tomas Mikula wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 9:01 PM, Sean True wrote:
>>>
>>> We've been looking at very large ta
Brian Beck writes:
>
> Hi John:
>
> It's a reasonable idea and one that we're actually discussing right
> now. There are related issues to consider which may take some time to
> sort out but I would hope to have it all figured out in a month or so.
> Will keep the list posted.
>
> Brian. (JIRA
Just a quick question: Which one is correct,
-fx-fill: none;
or
-fx-fill: null;
?
Thanks,
Tomas
Thanks for the quick answer.
Tomas
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 10:24 PM, David Grieve wrote:
> Either one.
>
>
> On 8/26/14, 4:21 PM, Tomas Mikula wrote:
>>
>> Just a quick question: Which one is correct,
>>
>> -fx-fill: none;
>>
>> or
>>
>> -fx-fill: null;
>>
>> ?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Tomas
>
>
Hi Randahl,
if on button click you only want to update an external boolean
property, bidirectional binding suggested by Martin should be all you
need.
If the problem is more complex, it might be useful to recognize that
your toggle button serves two distinct functions:
1. It reflects the state (o
Hi Pete,
work on this is tracked in https://javafx-jira.kenai.com/browse/RT-21598
In terms of the current API, I think the best solution is to add event
handlers and/or event filters on the TableView.
Regarding your proposed fixes, I have a blog post where I argue that
the wiring between the Beh
ace, yes, but not subclass (augment).
I believe that overriding keyboard shortcuts should be doable without
subclassing the skin (or behavior). I'm working on something right now
and hope to publish something soon.
Best,
Tomas
>
> Again, any suggestions for workarounds would be apprecia
Hi Pete,
On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 9:57 PM, Tomas Mikula wrote:
>
> I believe that overriding keyboard shortcuts should be doable without
> subclassing the skin (or behavior). I'm working on something right now
> and hope to publish something soon.
have a look at https://githu
Hi Scott,
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 7:01 PM, Scott Palmer wrote:
> Note: With the second combination above I really wanted something that
> worked for both MINUS and SUBTRACT simultaneously - since they both type
> the same Character and only one accelerator can be set on a MenuItem.
according to
Hi Kevin,
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 7:16 PM, Kevin Rushforth
wrote:
> It seems to me that this is working as designed. You have created two
> different KeyCombinations and asked that both fire your runnable. Further,
> both of the KeyCombinations match your key input since both a KeyPressed and
>
The explanation could be that on some systems the
KeyCharacterCombination("-").match picks the same key code as the one
produced by key press (e.g. MINUS), while on other systems it picks
the other one (SUBTRACT).
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 7:24 PM, Kevin Rushforth
wrote:
> Is this on a Mac or on Wi
The cause of the problem seems clear to me. This is what I observe on
my (Linux) system.
Pressing '-' on the main part of the keyboard produces MINUS key code
pressed. Pressing '-' on the numeric keypad produces SUBTRACT key code
pressed.
KeyCharacterCombination("-") matches MINUS pressed, but do
= KEY_PRESSED
&& (event.getCode() == MINUS || event.getCode() ==
SUBTRACT);
}
};
menuItem.setAccelerator(CtrlMinus);
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 8:05 PM, Tomas Mikula wrote:
> The cause of the problem seems clear to me. This is what I observe on
> my (Linux)
> That doesn't explain why this isn't happening for PLUS.
KeyCodeCombination(KeyCode.PLUS, KeyCombination.CONTROL_DOWN)
is never matched. It might even be impossible to get a KEY_PRESSED
event with key code PLUS with English keyboard layout. When I switch
keyboard layout to Slovak, which has the
d and then compare the characters.
This way your first attempt to capture both MINUS and SUBTRACT with a
single KeyCharacterCombination("-") would work, as well as capturing
all of Shift-EQUALS, PLUS, ADD with a single
KeyCharacterCombination("+").
Tomas
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014
On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 12:02 AM, Kevin Rushforth
wrote:
> Can you add this information to the JIRA?
>
> https://javafx-jira.kenai.com/browse/RT-38830
I added it to https://javafx-jira.kenai.com/browse/RT-27602.
Tomas
>
> Thanks.
>
> -- Kevin
>
>
> Tomas M
There might be some kind of infinite loop which is not apparent due to
asynchrony, such as recursive Platform.runLater
void foo() {
Platform.runLater(this::foo);
}
or an infinite loop in layout:
void layoutChildren() {
Platform.runLater(this::requestLayout);
}
On
1 - 100 of 158 matches
Mail list logo
