during
the command handling upgrade, because I could not compile them and began
to question whether anyone else could either. Thanks for submitting a
patch to keep them alive.
--
Zach Welch
CodeSourcery
zwe...@codesourcery.com
(650) 331-3385 x743
-development list in the hope of generating
useful feedback, but it requires subscribing to post (last I checked).
Sorry for the bad netiquette.
--
Zach Welch
CodeSourcery
zwe...@codesourcery.com
(650) 331-3385 x743
___
Openocd-development mailing list
Openocd
as it should be. I simply
can't stand 400 line functions. That's Just Wrong. However, they did
derive from my effort to grok MEM-AP ROM Tables, so I suppose there is
a fair connection to my intended work.
--
Zach Welch
CodeSourcery
zwe...@codesourcery.com
(650) 331-3385 x743
on the existing patches.
--
Zach Welch
CodeSourcery
zwe...@codesourcery.com
(650) 331-3385 x743
___
Openocd-development mailing list
Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
On 09/27/2010 07:12 AM, John Rigby wrote:
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 1:05 AM, Zach Welch zwe...@codesourcery.com wrote:
...
Last week, I started testing my BeagleBoard with OpenOCD, so I have
begun trying to validate and improve the Cortex-A8 support. Indeed, I
have already committed a minor
deprecation warning and plan to remove it after a couple of releases.
This will allow any tools that use it to continue working as expected.
--
Zach Welch
CodeSourcery
zwe...@codesourcery.com
(650) 331-3385 x743
___
Openocd-development mailing list
syntax for 'mww' and friends. I will
commit this new patch sometime soon, barring objections.
--
Zach Welch
CodeSourcery
zwe...@codesourcery.com
(650) 331-3385 x743
From 3f0a1129db69a9cc11dc2c37c9f0cd3b6fda22c2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Zachary T Welch zwe...@codesourcery.com
Date: Fri, 24
, but I would again
appreciate any feedback from those who have gone before me. Has anyone
else been planning to attack this new problem?
--
Zach Welch
CodeSourcery
zwe...@codesourcery.com
(650) 331-3385 x743
___
Openocd-development mailing list
Openocd
. Thanks in advance for your time and
consideration on these matters.
--
Zach Welch
CodeSourcery
zwe...@codesourcery.com
(650) 331-3385 x743
___
Openocd-development mailing list
Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo
On Thu, 2009-12-31 at 10:33 -0600, Dean Glazeski wrote:
Hi all,
To give some background on what I'm playing with, I'm trying to do an
implementation for dataflash devices. This work is not looking into
doing SPI over FT2232 or anything, I'm looking at running some native
code on my ARM9
On Thu, 2009-12-17 at 21:44 +0100, Carsten Breuer wrote:
Hi all,
after finding out, that malloc come back with NULL
even on linux (where people says here, it don't),
im starting to loose interest in the hole thing.
So what should we do?
I think now, that all this arguments not to
I would almost prefer that you use a Makefile trick here. We should
avoid adding new #if's in the code when it's possible to avoid them.
At the very least, provide two _complete_ versions of the function.
Your new comment is misleading, as it only applies to one branch.
On Tue, 2009-12-15 at
On Sun, 2009-12-13 at 15:49 -0800, David Brownell wrote:
[snip]
Note that MISRA is not universally lauded. As I understand, some of
its practices are contrary to other widely adopted coding policies.
Sure. Some points are a laugh like a null pointer should not be
dereferenced.
On Thu, 2009-12-10 at 13:18 +, Spencer Oliver wrote:
Spencer Oliver wrote:
Zachary T Welch wrote:
Hi all,
These patches clean up the server and system startup. The first patch
factors the GDB server setup to be more conducive to deferred
initialization of targets (in a later
I would say that the builddir should precede the srcdir. Happily, this
should also generate a more minimal patch.
Patches should touch as few lines as possible. Make all of them match
the form:
FOO = \
foo \
bar
not
FOO = foo \
bar
The first form makes it
As far as I'm concerned, you never need our sign-off for this file. :)
--Z
On Tue, 2009-12-08 at 09:39 +0100, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
Signed-off-by: Øyvind Harboe oyvind.har...@zylin.com
---
src/ecosboard.c |4
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git
On Tue, 2009-12-08 at 01:07 -0800, David Brownell wrote:
On Tuesday 08 December 2009, Zach Welch wrote:
As far as I'm concerned, you never need our sign-off for this file. :)
--Z
On Tue, 2009-12-08 at 09:39 +0100, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
Signed-off-by: Øyvind Harboe oyvind.har
Do you really need to have the commands.[ch] changes here? If you can
leave that alone, it would be preferred, as it doesn't appear to have
anything to do with this patch.
Also, you should not convert header file #includes in .c files to if
the header is in the same directory. Indeed, that is
, fixing one part of the problem at
a time.
Sincerely,
Zach Welch
Corvallis, OR
___
Openocd-development mailing list
Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
On Mon, 2009-12-07 at 12:26 +0100, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
On Sun, Dec 6, 2009 at 2:51 PM, Øyvind Harboe oyvind.har...@zylin.com wrote:
1. Move the $(srcdir) from defining _DIR vars to their use. i.e.
set just the directory component.
I'm not quite sure what you mean by this. I
be relatively safe to push. It might be best to
do this integration in stages so each phase gets good testing, but what
do others think about these changes and overall strategy?
Cheers,
Zach Welch
Corvallis, OR
___
Openocd-development mailing list
On Sun, 2009-12-06 at 18:05 -0800, David Brownell wrote:
I thought I'd try mem info in GDB. Nothing. Why?
Well, flash banks doesn't show anything any more. Why?
Nothing calls flash_bank_add() ... handle_flash_bank_command()
just leaks the structure it filled out.
Whoops that must
On Sun, 2009-12-06 at 19:55 -0800, Zach Welch wrote:
On Sun, 2009-12-06 at 18:05 -0800, David Brownell wrote:
I thought I'd try mem info in GDB. Nothing. Why?
Well, flash banks doesn't show anything any more. Why?
Nothing calls flash_bank_add() ... handle_flash_bank_command
On Sun, 2009-12-06 at 20:34 -0800, David Brownell wrote:
On Sunday 06 December 2009, Zach Welch wrote:
On Sun, 2009-12-06 at 18:05 -0800, David Brownell wrote:
I thought I'd try mem info in GDB. Nothing. Why?
The first thing I tried, by the way, was
gdb_memory_map enable
On Sat, 2009-12-05 at 08:25 +0100, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
This worked pretty well, but there are lots of (to me) inexplicable
-I's on the command line still and none of them point to the right
place in the build tree. I'm testing minidummy build != src dir.
oharboe/fixminidriver2
On Sat, 2009-12-05 at 00:51 -0800, David Brownell wrote:
On Friday 04 December 2009, Zach Welch wrote:
That's a useful statement of the extreme, but note that it's in
two parts: decouple ... and switch.
Decoupling is one of those things that's not fully understandable
except
On Sat, 2009-12-05 at 11:14 +0100, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 8:45 AM, Zach Welch z...@superlucidity.net wrote:
On Sat, 2009-12-05 at 08:35 +0100, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
The approach seems to work fine, but requires that some other
issues are sorted out first with include
Hi all,
The master branch on my repo.or.cz mirror has a couple of patches that
begin to unify the flash tree, which will eventually lead to the
elimination of a bit more duplicated code. It's using the container_of
macro first used by the target module. The first patch introduces the
basic
On Sat, 2009-12-05 at 13:26 -0800, David Brownell wrote:
On Sunday 29 November 2009, Zachary T Welch wrote:
Note: this audit revealed some potential bugs with the command context
implementation. There was a reason that commands were added at the
end of the list. Shallow copying of
On Fri, 2009-12-04 at 07:48 +0100, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 3:04 AM, Zachary T Welch z...@superlucidity.net
wrote:
Commands that do not need to use Jim should be registered as
high-level command handlers.
Why is that?
Nb! ls *does* need to use jim to return a list
This is actually expected; there was no warning previously, and the
dummy driver always fails because it returns garbage.
It still starts up, right? The fact that it is telling you where
something failed is a good thing, if were talking about real hardware...
right?
--Z
On Fri, 2009-12-04 at
On Thu, 2009-12-03 at 18:04 -0800, Zachary T Welch wrote:
Hi all,
The first two patches work to eliminate some Jim handling in the
helper and JTAG modules, with the later being nearly purged.
If the command layer provides some wrappers for Jim's return
handling mechanisms, then all handlers
On Fri, 2009-12-04 at 16:03 +0100, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
It's getting there, see oharboe/fixminidriver.
I had to mess with lots of Makefile.am to pollute the include path. If I
can get that out of the way, then I should be able to clean up the
rest too
Yeah, those changes should not go into
On Fri, 2009-12-04 at 22:51 +0100, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 10:36 PM, Zach Welch z...@superlucidity.net wrote:
On Fri, 2009-12-04 at 16:03 +0100, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
It's getting there, see oharboe/fixminidriver.
I had to mess with lots of Makefile.am to pollute
On Fri, 2009-12-04 at 21:46 -0300, Esteban Lucchesi wrote:
Hi all,
I'm new to the list. I've read it often these last days because I
bought a Hitex LPC-Stick for the LPC2468 and I wanted to make it work
with Eclipse+Yagarto+OpenOCD.
I added the layout lpcstick to ft2232.c and the
On Fri, 2009-12-04 at 03:43 -0800, Zach Welch wrote:
[snip]
The last two patches begin to split the NOR flash layer into
public and private APIS (flash/nor/{core,imp}.h, respectively)
and into core and TCL modules (flash/nor/{core,tcl}.c, likewise).
More patches will be required
On Fri, 2009-12-04 at 19:45 -0600, Dean Glazeski wrote:
Don't mind me when it comes to the NAND. I won't be active probably
until Christmas break when I no longer have persistent projects :).
At that time I welcome the challenge of forcing my stuff into the
proper mold. I'll have to make a
On Fri, 2009-12-04 at 20:54 -0800, David Brownell wrote:
On Friday 04 December 2009, Zach Welch wrote:
Sounds good to me. I have given the target directory a wide berth since
you have been working on it. ;)
Glad to hear it. :)
I pushed; N == 10.
This should be the bulk
On Fri, 2009-12-04 at 23:31 -0800, David Brownell wrote:
On Tuesday 01 December 2009, Zach Welch wrote:
We should approach this problem as though we intend to eventually
decouple Jim from the core functionality and switch to a different
front-end language.
That's a useful statement
On Sat, 2009-12-05 at 08:35 +0100, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
The approach seems to work fine, but requires that some other
issues are sorted out first with include dirs.
From error message above, there are two strange -I additions:
NB! build != src dir
-I. = current build directory
-I../.. =
On Thu, 2009-12-03 at 08:23 +0100, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
I would like to see this merged.
Any objections?
Go for it!
--Z
___
Openocd-development mailing list
Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de
On Thu, 2009-12-03 at 09:20 +0100, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
The public API _must_ be a non-inline version of the API that calls the
inline version. Period.
You don't explain why this is necessary and I don't agree. I believe
you assume that it is impossible to allow the minidriver to inline
On Thu, 2009-12-03 at 09:53 +0100, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
So the minidriver (including classic API) must have control over whether or
not the following fn's gets inlined or not. These fn's really are in the inner
loops and boil away to *nothing* on a low performance low latency
system.
And they
On Thu, 2009-12-03 at 10:22 +0100, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
(Ref. discussion I think we've settled that the minidriver can either
implement an ABI or use inlining for performance.)
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 10:11 AM, Zach Welch z...@superlucidity.net wrote:
On Thu, 2009-12-03 at 09:53 +0100
On Thu, 2009-12-03 at 08:23 +0100, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
I would like to see this merged.
Any objections?
Actually, I did just find two things:
1) The header is missing from the Makefile.am
2) The header is missing a copyright header and #ifdef wrapper
--Z
On Thu, 2009-12-03 at 10:39 +0100, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
I added a missing #include sys/stat.h, but it is not quite ready to commit
yet I think.
Does it build under Windows? Perhaps it does, I didn't try.
I don't think we should try to make this work under anything but POSIX
API for now,
On Tue, 2009-12-01 at 21:08 -0800, Zach Welch wrote:
Hi all,
Assuming a split between policy and mechanism can be addressed, OpenOCD
will become much more usable as a proper library. One of the questions
that needs resolution is how to install our header files. The answer
that we chose
On Thu, 2009-12-03 at 10:51 +0100, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 10:36 AM, Zach Welch z...@superlucidity.net wrote:
On Thu, 2009-12-03 at 10:22 +0100, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
(Ref. discussion I think we've settled that the minidriver can either
implement an ABI or use inlining
On Thu, 2009-12-03 at 01:50 -0800, Zach Welch wrote:
On Tue, 2009-12-01 at 21:08 -0800, Zach Welch wrote:
Hi all,
Assuming a split between policy and mechanism can be addressed, OpenOCD
will become much more usable as a proper library. One of the questions
that needs resolution is how
On Thu, 2009-12-03 at 12:27 -0500, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
On Thu, 3 Dec 2009, Zach Welch wrote:
On Thu, 2009-12-03 at 10:39 +0100, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
I added a missing #include sys/stat.h, but it is not quite ready to
commit
yet I think.
Does it build under Windows? Perhaps
On Thu, 2009-12-03 at 15:00 -0800, David Brownell wrote:
On Sunday 29 November 2009, Zach Welch wrote:
Broken how? It's worked as advertised, as far as I know.
It was allowing all commands to run during CONFIG stage, regardless of
whether they were marked EXEC-only. Broken
On Tue, 2009-12-01 at 13:01 -0800, Zachary T Welch wrote:
Hi all,
This series makes most of the individual steps in 'init' accessible to
direct invocation. The changes should allow recovery in cases when
OpenOCD is run interactively and (for example) you fail to specify an
interface before
On Tue, 2009-12-01 at 20:06 -0800, Zachary T Welch wrote:
Hi all,
This series removes all #if logic from the src/openocd.c file, making
it look much nicer and helping to stablize our ABI in the process.
Share and Enjoy,
--Z
___
Openocd-development
On Wed, 2009-12-02 at 12:46 +0100, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
Also, gdb_port is incremented even if starting the target fails.
I'll take a look at these regressions today.
--Z
___
Openocd-development mailing list
Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de
Do not apply this until you fix the problem noted below.
Thanks,
Zach
On Wed, 2009-12-02 at 14:38 +0100, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
Fix 'regression' where jtag_add_dr_out() is no longer inlined
after refactoring.
The minidrivers strip away all the overhead and allow inner loops
to communicate
On Wed, 2009-12-02 at 16:13 +0100, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 4:07 PM, Yegor Yefremov
yegorsli...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 3:47 PM, Øyvind Harboe oyvind.har...@zylin.com
wrote:
On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 3:42 PM, Yegor Yefremov
yegorsli...@googlemail.com
On Wed, 2009-12-02 at 15:42 +0100, Yegor Yefremov wrote:
I found some short description about TFTP support in OpenOCD but it
seems to be restricted to eCOS or ZY1000 debugger.
Are there any plans to implement such a feature? The usage were for
example following: I have my Linux development
I just noticed that there may be other problems with this; I question
the need for both -I and #include dirname/ Seems like one or the
other is enough, so there appears to be a new redundancy here.
On Wed, 2009-12-02 at 13:39 -0800, Zach Welch wrote:
Do not apply this until you fix
On Wed, 2009-12-02 at 13:47 -0800, Zach Welch wrote:
On Wed, 2009-12-02 at 15:42 +0100, Yegor Yefremov wrote:
I found some short description about TFTP support in OpenOCD but it
seems to be restricted to eCOS or ZY1000 debugger.
Are there any plans to implement such a feature? The usage
On Wed, 2009-12-02 at 22:59 +0100, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
I've seen that the tftp is really just a vestigal habit that
is quickly replaced once the benefits of the *great* gdb
load capabilities that OpenOCD offers have been discovered.
It's fast + it offers automatic flash programming support.
On Wed, 2009-12-02 at 23:00 +0100, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 10:55 PM, Zach Welch z...@superlucidity.net wrote:
I just noticed that there may be other problems with this; I question
the need for both -I and #include dirname/ Seems like one or the
other is enough, so
On Wed, 2009-12-02 at 22:54 +0100, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
+
+/* The minidriver contains inline versions of JTAG fn's */
+#include minidriver.h
+
This is bad, as you are creating a new layering violation that will need
to be removed. You should move this #include to somewhere other
On Wed, 2009-12-02 at 14:32 -0800, Zach Welch wrote:
On Wed, 2009-12-02 at 22:54 +0100, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
+
+/* The minidriver contains inline versions of JTAG fn's */
+#include minidriver.h
+
This is bad, as you are creating a new layering violation that will need
On Wed, 2009-12-02 at 14:44 -0800, Zach Welch wrote:
On Wed, 2009-12-02 at 14:32 -0800, Zach Welch wrote:
On Wed, 2009-12-02 at 22:54 +0100, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
+
+/* The minidriver contains inline versions of JTAG fn's */
+#include minidriver.h
+
This is bad, as you
On Wed, 2009-12-02 at 15:00 -0800, David Brownell wrote:
Hmm, I'll have to try pulling this ... but one of my
test configs is now triggering the perplexing message
Error: The 'init' command must be used before 'init'.
That seems somehow ... not possible. ;)
Here's the logic: all
On Wed, 2009-12-02 at 15:57 -0800, David Brownell wrote:
On Wednesday 02 December 2009, Zach Welch wrote:
On Wed, 2009-12-02 at 15:00 -0800, David Brownell wrote:
Hmm, I'll have to try pulling this ... but one of my
test configs is now triggering the perplexing message
Error
On Wed, 2009-12-02 at 15:36 -0800, David Brownell wrote:
On Wednesday 02 December 2009, David Brownell wrote:
Hmm, I'll have to try pulling this ... but one of my
test configs is now triggering the perplexing message
Error: The 'init' command must be used before 'init'.
That
Pushed Now, does it become apparent why I want a test suite that
runs via 'make check'? It might save me from myself. :)
On Wed, 2009-12-02 at 16:19 -0800, Zachary T Welch wrote:
The command handler registration was put at the top level, rather
than as a subcommand. Move it to where it
On Tue, 2009-12-01 at 15:30 -0800, Zach Welch wrote:
Hi all,
I want to clean up our flash directory, moving the files into
subdirectories and simplifying the nand filenames. This paves the way
for future types of flash technologies, drivers for which seem like they
could be imminent
On Wed, 2009-12-02 at 17:13 -0800, David Brownell wrote:
On Wednesday 02 December 2009, Zach Welch wrote:
Add '-c noinit' at the end to suppress the second 'init', if the first
one succeeds okay.
I'd rather just preserve the original semantics, where init just
ensures that things were
On Wed, 2009-12-02 at 16:54 -0800, Zach Welch wrote:
[snip]
I will be pushing these shortly, though I am going to add another patch
to move the JTAG drivers into src/jtag/drivers/. This helps clean up
the src/jtag directory and puts the drivers/ directory on even level
with the minidriver
On Tue, 2009-12-01 at 08:52 +0100, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
How about a warning when it's _not_ explicitly enabled or disabled by
the user? Specifically, tell the users to try enabling those features
or to add explicit commands to stop the warnings. Scripts for boards
where that feature will
Only one minor suggested improvement, below. Otherwise, these both look
okay to me.
On Tue, 2009-12-01 at 08:48 +0100, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
In embedded hosts, the Jim interpreter can come from the
existing context rather than be created by OpenOCD.
Signed-off-by: Øyvind Harboe
On Tue, 2009-12-01 at 09:17 +0100, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
#if !BUILD_ECOSBOARD
It is now safe to kill this #if logic too. It's like a bonus prize. ;)
Almost, but not quite. I tried before I remembered that
Jim is embedded into the athttpd server... You know the
slightly messy and
On Tue, 2009-12-01 at 09:37 +0100, Michael Schwingen wrote:
Zach Welch wrote:
On Mon, 2009-11-30 at 14:42 -0800, David Brownell wrote:
On Monday 30 November 2009, Zachary T Welch wrote:
Registers a signal handler to catch SIGSEGV in order to display the
stack where the program
On Tue, 2009-12-01 at 09:45 +0100, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
Hm - I'm with David here: I am not very fond of re-inventing parts of
gdb to include it in OpenOCD.
Fully implementing this would make OpenOCD depend on libbfd just for
crash reports - this is ridiculous.
If something like this
On Tue, 2009-12-01 at 10:16 +0100, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
The patch to ecosboard.c always gives a non-NULL value, and we always
pass in NULL from openocd.c. The #if is entirely redundant when you
take a moment to look at the big picture.
Except it doesn't build, it's that messy bit with
On Tue, 2009-12-01 at 09:18 +0100, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 9:03 AM, Zach Welch z...@superlucidity.net wrote:
On Tue, 2009-12-01 at 08:52 +0100, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
How about a warning when it's _not_ explicitly enabled or disabled by
the user? Specifically, tell
On Tue, 2009-12-01 at 01:23 -0800, David Brownell wrote:
Registers a signal handler to catch SIGSEGV in order to display the
stack where the program crashed.
Is this for inside OpenOCD? If so, I'd rather just expect folk
to run inside GDB. Either they're running natively and
On Tue, 2009-12-01 at 10:25 +0100, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 10:17 AM, Zach Welch z...@superlucidity.net wrote:
On Tue, 2009-12-01 at 09:45 +0100, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
Hm - I'm with David here: I am not very fond of re-inventing parts of
gdb to include it in OpenOCD
On Tue, 2009-12-01 at 10:24 +0100, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 10:19 AM, Zach Welch z...@superlucidity.net wrote:
On Tue, 2009-12-01 at 10:16 +0100, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
The patch to ecosboard.c always gives a non-NULL value, and we always
pass in NULL from openocd.c
On Tue, 2009-12-01 at 01:52 -0800, David Brownell wrote:
On Tuesday 01 December 2009, Zach Welch wrote:
On Tue, 2009-12-01 at 01:23 -0800, David Brownell wrote:
Registers a signal handler to catch SIGSEGV in order to display the
stack where the program crashed
On Tue, 2009-12-01 at 10:36 +0100, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
No one was talking about linking with GDB. That's just insane. ;)
libbfd is part of binutils. But again it should be_optional.
OK. Explain the benefit of complicating OpenOCD vs. adding a script
to launch OpenOCD via GDB then...
On Tue, 2009-12-01 at 11:06 +0100, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 11:02 AM, Zach Welch z...@superlucidity.net wrote:
On Tue, 2009-12-01 at 10:36 +0100, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
No one was talking about linking with GDB. That's just insane. ;)
libbfd is part of binutils
On Tue, 2009-12-01 at 11:14 +0100, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
Again, you have missed the point. This is about users and our releases.
I cannot make that point more clearly. It is not about developers who
are willing to use GDB. It's about users who aren't.
I haven't done the statistics, but
On Tue, 2009-12-01 at 11:27 +0100, Michael Schwingen wrote:
Zach Welch wrote:
Hm - I'm with David here: I am not very fond of re-inventing parts of
gdb to include it in OpenOCD.
Fully implementing this would make OpenOCD depend on libbfd just for
crash reports - this is ridiculous
On Tue, 2009-12-01 at 21:57 +0100, Andreas Fritiofson wrote:
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 10:32 AM, Zach Welch z...@superlucidity.net wrote:
On Tue, 2009-12-01 at 10:25 +0100, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 10:17 AM, Zach Welch z...@superlucidity.net wrote:
On Tue, 2009-12-01 at 09
On Mon, 2009-11-30 at 16:38 -0600, Austin, Alex wrote:
Hello,
I’ve built a JTAG adapter (Very similar to oocdlink-h) using the
FT4232H instead of the FT2232H. Due to the lack of ACBUS on the 4232,
I’ve routed the reset lines to the same pins on BDBUS. CDBUS and DDBUS
both go to serial
On Sat, 2009-11-28 at 15:26 -0800, David Brownell wrote:
On Saturday 28 November 2009, Zach Welch wrote:
On Sat, 2009-11-28 at 14:07 -0800, David Brownell wrote:
On Saturday 28 November 2009, Zach Welch wrote:
Next, we should consider updating all help messages to full sentences,
so
On Tue, 2009-12-01 at 23:09 +0100, Andreas Fritiofson wrote:
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 11:08 PM, Andreas Fritiofson
andreas.fritiof...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 10:23 PM, Zach Welch z...@superlucidity.net wrote:
On Tue, 2009-12-01 at 21:57 +0100, Andreas Fritiofson wrote:
On Tue
On Tue, 2009-12-01 at 14:28 -0800, David Brownell wrote:
On Tuesday 01 December 2009, Zach Welch wrote:
The use of angle brackets intends to distinguish parameter names from
literal arguments. Thus [foo] means an optional thing which
semantically will be used as a foo, whereas
On Tue, 2009-12-01 at 10:08 -0800, David Brownell wrote:
On Tuesday 01 December 2009, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
Zach made a good point that there are bug reports we are not receiving
today. Those are the ones he's after here I think.
I'm sure this project loses more potential bug reports by
Hi all,
Part of my impetus to restructure the command set is to see more
separation of policy and mechanism in the code. The JTAG layer shows
how this can be done: a tcl.c file contains all of the command handlers,
while core.c contains the low-level functions that do the work. It
might be
at 17:52 -0600, Dean Glazeski wrote:
Aargh, darn school! I can't keep up with these patches, but do it!
This leaves some room for work I want to do when I have time again :).
// Dean Glazeski
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 5:30 PM, Zach Welch z...@superlucidity.net
wrote:
Hi all
On Wed, 2009-12-02 at 00:56 +0100, Andreas Fritiofson wrote:
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 11:50 PM, Zach Welch z...@superlucidity.net wrote:
On Tue, 2009-12-01 at 23:09 +0100, Andreas Fritiofson wrote:
[snip]
I like it, except I think it needs to be disabled in the default case.
We will get
On Tue, 2009-12-01 at 13:01 -0800, Zachary T Welch wrote:
Hi all,
This series makes most of the individual steps in 'init' accessible to
direct invocation. The changes should allow recovery in cases when
OpenOCD is run interactively and (for example) you fail to specify an
interface before
On Tue, 2009-12-01 at 20:49 -0800, David Brownell wrote:
On Tuesday 01 December 2009, Zachary T Welch wrote:
This series removes all #if logic from the src/openocd.c file, making
it look much nicer and helping to stablize our ABI in the process.
Yes!
These patches were easy. I am not yet
Hi all,
Assuming a split between policy and mechanism can be addressed, OpenOCD
will become much more usable as a proper library. One of the questions
that needs resolution is how to install our header files. The answer
that we chose for this will determine how much restructuring will be
On Tue, 2009-12-01 at 20:57 -0800, David Brownell wrote:
On Tuesday 01 December 2009, Zach Welch wrote:
After the command cleanup that I have started, I believe this type of
factoring deserves to be pursued in the other modules. I propose making
these changes in the following order
Do not apply. The old implementation was total crap, and your vsnprintf
implementation must be too. That's not our problem, and it can be
worked around without destroying the improvements for others.
Use a single 'char' on the stack. One character should be enough.
--Z
On Mon, 2009-11-30 at
1 - 100 of 873 matches
Mail list logo
