Would the estimate be any shorter if we picked an
active Sun developer and put
him outside for the SWAN for week and see how he
coped? ;)
I'd volunteer myself, but I suspect it wouldn't
have the same impact as an ON
developer.
I think the impact would be equivalent; pain to
How many partitions is it possible manually to select?
Is it so that only three:
swap, / (root) and /export/home
I have done partitions:
swap, / (root) /opt, /usr and /export/home
with Solaris Express-Community and then I try install Nexenta.
I cannot select /opt and /usr. Why?
If I install/auto
In addition to the above request for build number identified on Solaris Express
download page, I'd really like to be able to subscribe to a Solaris Express
email list that notifies subscribers when the new Solaris Express build is
posted and available for download.
This message posted from
On Tue, 5 Dec 2006, Dennis Clarke wrote:
On Tue, 5 Dec 2006, Stephen Hahn wrote:
* Laszlo (Laca) Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-12-05 11:11]:
On Tue, 2006-12-05 at 10:13 -0800, Marilyn Shoemaker wrote:
So what we really need is some sort of registry of open source
components available
Ganesh,
Yes this agent was developed using SEA. The SSAxxx api is used to register the
agent and trees.
Doesn't this document
http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/817-3000/6mikgngho?a=view#migrationad
indicate support for older agents via the SEA proxy ?
Tom
This message posted from
Firstly, apologies for posting a non-OpenSolaris question here!
The company I work for is migrating its main UNIX server from Solaris 2.6 to 9
and we would like, if at all possible, to preserve users passwords, since we
would prefer to keep any disruption to our users to a minimum. Is there any
Very nice .. vibrant community? Oh boy! I have never had 32 posts in a
discussion regarding a I'm new here, trying to understand .. topic..
In any case, I read a post about how the OS are merely nv_b50, nv_b51 and so
on.. that clears up stuff even more.. just newer builds.
Besides, I am
On Wed, 2006-12-06 at 05:38 -0800, Martti Hamunen wrote:
How many partitions is it possible manually to select?
Is it so that only three:
swap, / (root) and /export/home
I have done partitions:
swap, / (root) /opt, /usr and /export/home
with Solaris Express-Community and then I try install
Andrew Pattison wrote:
Firstly, apologies for posting a non-OpenSolaris question here!
The company I work for is migrating its main UNIX server from Solaris 2.6 to 9
and we would like, if at all possible, to preserve users passwords, since we
would prefer to keep any disruption to our users
Andrew Pattison writes:
Firstly, apologies for posting a non-OpenSolaris question here!
The company I work for is migrating its main UNIX server from Solaris 2.6 to
9 and we would like, if at all possible, to preserve users passwords, since
we would prefer to keep any disruption to our
Upgrading Solaris versions won't touch the /etc/passwd or /etc/shadow file, so
you should be fine.
Brett
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Hello all,
There is a new OpenSolaris project for your enjoyment and
contribution called the Zone Manager.
The purpose of this project is to simplify Solaris zones creation
and management down to a single non-interactive command line tool.
The Zone Manager (zonemgr) should enable
Hi,
Apologies for posting a non-OpenSolaris answer. [I know the OpenSolaris
guys will fill you in just fine] but if you are looking for assistance
in migrating, Sun's Partner Advantage programs can help. Check out:
http://developers.sun.com/solaris/overview/partners/index.jsp. They have
On Dec 6, 2006, at 3:44 PM, Wes Williams wrote:
In addition to the above request for build number identified on
Solaris Express download page, I'd really like to be able to
subscribe to a Solaris Express email list that notifies subscribers
when the new Solaris Express build is posted and
Brett Albertson wrote:
Upgrading Solaris versions won't touch the /etc/passwd or /etc/shadow file, so
you should be fine.
Not quite true. Upgrade can change those files, I know I've written
some of the code that does it! However it won't (modulo bugs in the
code I wrote and others
Sorry - I worded that badly. We're actually moving over to a completely new
machine. Also, our existing system doesn't use shadow passwords - the passwords
are stored directly in /etc/passwd. Can I simply copy the relevant lines from
/etc/passwd to the new machine then?
Thanks
Andrew.
* Bob Palowoda [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-12-06 00:37]:
Would the estimate be any shorter if we picked an
active Sun developer and put
him outside for the SWAN for week and see how he
coped? ;)
I'd volunteer myself, but I suspect it wouldn't
have the same impact as an ON
To summarize my experience and what others have alluded to, my suggestion is to
start with Nexenta since you are used to apt-get and Linux. However, much like
most Linux folks don't start with Gentoo but end up there, keep you eye on
learning enough to migrate to a more production-like
Andrew Pattison wrote:
Sorry - I worded that badly. We're actually moving over to a completely new
machine. Also, our existing system doesn't use shadow passwords - the passwords
are stored directly in /etc/passwd. Can I simply copy the relevant lines from
/etc/passwd to the new machine then?
Andrew Pattison writes:
Sorry - I worded that badly. We're actually moving over to a
completely new machine. Also, our existing system doesn't use shadow
passwords - the passwords are stored directly in /etc/passwd. Can I
simply copy the relevant lines from /etc/passwd to the new machine
Sorry - I worded that badly. We're actually moving over to a completely new
machine. Also, our exi
sting system doesn't use shadow passwords - the passwords are stored directly
in /etc/passwd. Can I
simply copy the relevant lines from /etc/passwd to the new machine then?
You can't have
No no no no no no no no.
and once more for good measure: no.
If you maintain this sort of mentality, then
OpenSolaris will never be a
separate entity. This is exactly the sort of thought
we need to get
away from.
Why? The source code is free to the public. Should Sun go buh-bye
Don't make it more complicated than it already is,
There we go. This would be one of those I told you so moments.
It's complicated. Way overcomplicated.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
But there *is* a distinction. Solaris !=
OpenSolaris, and vice versa.
OK Rich, if Sun's Solaris is based on OpenSolaris, meaning it is Sun's
distribution of OpenSolaris, what is the distinction?
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
If you maintain this sort of mentality, then
OpenSolaris will never be a
separate entity. This is exactly the sort of thought
we need to get
away from.
BTW Steve, as a person to person, this little snippet really got to me.
For 15 years I've lived on Sun and Solaris, ate, breathed,
UNIX admin writes:
But there *is* a distinction. Solaris !=
OpenSolaris, and vice versa.
OK Rich, if Sun's Solaris is based on OpenSolaris, meaning it is Sun's
distribution of OpenSolaris, what is the distinction?
There are things available in Open Solaris that are not yet in any
UNIX admin writes:
Now all of a sudden associating Solaris -- most notably OpenSolaris
-- is not what we want, now it's bad, in the way, out of favor, not
in fashion,
Untrue. Solaris is still cool.
It's just that Open Solaris is *NOT* the same thing as Sun's Solaris,
and quite
On Wed, 6 Dec 2006, UNIX admin wrote:
OK Rich, if Sun's Solaris is based on OpenSolaris, meaning it is
Sun's distribution of OpenSolaris, what is the distinction?
Very simply, Sun takes what is in OpenSolaris, removes some stuff
and adds some other stuff. The result is the Solaris we all
UNIX admin wrote:
But there *is* a distinction. Solaris !=
OpenSolaris, and vice versa.
if Sun's Solaris is based on OpenSolaris,
meaning it is Sun's distribution of OpenSolaris,
what is the distinction?
Ignoring the fact that OpenSolaris is not a distro,
and Solaris is, a version of
UNIX admin wrote:
Sun Solaris is Sun's distribution of OpenSolaris.
Period.
OK, so where's the difference? Sun Solaris is Sun's distribution of
OpenSolaris. OK. So if B is based on A, but not quite A, however most of it is
made out of A, you could argue that B is not A, but however is A for
UNIX admin wrote:
If you maintain this sort of mentality, then
OpenSolaris will never be a
separate entity. This is exactly the sort of thought
we need to get
away from.
BTW Steve, as a person to person, this little snippet really got to me.
For 15 years I've lived on Sun and Solaris, ate,
UNIX admin wrote:
Try using Sun Solaris to make this more obvious.
As far as I am concerned, current Solaris is another distribution of
OpenSolaris, most notably Sun's dsitribution of it.
However it looks like we're trying to put as much distance between Sun's
OpenSolaris distro and
John Weekley wrote:
James McPherson wrote:
On 11/27/06, John Weekley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
James McPherson wrote:
...
btw, were you able to get a crash dump with this issue?
Is that possible while booting from the DVD/CD?
Darn - I'd missed that detail. I suppose there possibly is a
way
Hah,
I managed to install the CD ISO version of Centos 3.8 without a glitch.
I simply followed the Brand Z community's instructions and left the
installer(s) going overnight.
Only real question is that when I've logged in to the system using
zlogin linux and do:
# export
did you make sure to enable remote x access via the xhost(1) command
on 192.168.1.247?
ed
On Thu, Dec 07, 2006 at 08:40:31AM +1030, David Lloyd wrote:
Hah,
I managed to install the CD ISO version of Centos 3.8 without a glitch.
I simply followed the Brand Z community's instructions and
Edward,
did you make sure to enable remote x access via the xhost(1) command
on 192.168.1.247
Yes.
However, because of Gtk's refusal to report what DISPLAY, it looks like
it's not seeing the DISPLAY variable at all.
DSL
___
opensolaris-discuss
did you make sure to enable remote x access via the xhost(1) command
on 192.168.1.247?
or use xauth
xauth nlist myhostname:0.0 x.key
then copy that into a terminal session or use vi or whatever to get it to
the other machine or container
then ... once there
xauth nmerge x.key
then set
On Thu, Dec 07, 2006 at 08:55:29AM +1030, David Lloyd wrote:
Edward,
did you make sure to enable remote x access via the xhost(1) command
on 192.168.1.247
Yes.
However, because of Gtk's refusal to report what DISPLAY, it looks like
it's not seeing the DISPLAY variable at all.
hm.
Hi,
I don't play in OpenSolaris. I'm not a developer any more. I work for
Sun and I love Solaris and have lived and breathed and eaten and dreamt
it for almost 16 years. I cannot tell you how much I and all of Sun
appreciate your efforts and blood in the trenches. You are our bretheren.
awesome. thank you.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
David Lloyd wrote:
Hah,
I managed to install the CD ISO version of Centos 3.8 without a glitch.
I simply followed the Brand Z community's instructions and left the
installer(s) going overnight.
Only real question is that when I've logged in to the system using
zlogin linux and do:
i've done lots of solaris installs in the last year and one thing that i'm
still a bit foggy on is moving my user's home directories to a ZFS filesystem.
whenever i install a system i use smc to add users and it creates their home
directories. i then make ZFS filesystems for each user and move
Patrick P Korsnick wrote:
i've done lots of solaris installs in the last year and one thing that
i'm still a bit foggy on is moving my user's home directories to a ZFS
filesystem.
whenever i install a system i use smc to add users and it creates their
home directories. i then make ZFS
On 12/6/06, Stephen Lau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
UNIX admin wrote:
Try using Sun Solaris to make this more obvious.
As far as I am concerned, current Solaris is another distribution of
OpenSolaris, most notably Sun's dsitribution of it.
This has become one of the most useless threads i've
For background on what this is, see:
http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/message.jspa?messageID=24416#24416
http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/message.jspa?messageID=25200#25200
=
opensolaris-discuss 11/16 - 11/30
=
Size of all threads
45 matches
Mail list logo
