On 8/22/07, Kaiwai Gardiner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2007-08-21 at 17:34 -0400, Brandorr wrote:
I am putting together an x96 server, and almost every component I look
at isn't listed on the HCL. (I'd prefer not to shop from the HCL)
Is there a list of what has been tested and
I'd like to propose Nigel Smith to be a core contributor in the
Opensolaris storage community. I've been impressed by his aid to the
community especially around iSCSI.
The voting procedures are here:
http://opensolaris.org/os/community/ogb/governance/
We need a consensus vote - three total
Ian et al,
[trying again]
AMD/nVidia motherboards and graphics are a safe bet. I've built quite a
few systems with this combination, including QuadFX and all the
components just work.
I'm currently using a:
http://www.asus.com/products.aspx?l1=3l2=11l3=534l4=0model=1637modelmenu=1
...or
Hello W.,
Sunday, August 19, 2007, 1:23:39 AM, you wrote:
but it won't unzip those parts first.
WWL SDM will automatically do the unzipping.
I wish that with Solaris/OpenSolaris ISO files it would also combine
them in one file...
--
Best regards,
Robert Milkowski
MC [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But the second approach is based on the wrong asumption that UDF is always
the
best choice.
Sometimes you have to recognize that good enough is just as good as (or
even better than) perfect :)
I did explain why it is not good enough.
Jörg
--
EMail:[EMAIL
The problem is not really just with Adobe Acrobat, it's also with the rest of
their product line. They have a great history of shooting themselves in the
foot with their own market. I have seen many, many content publishing companies
go through all sorts of grief with Adobe over software
On Wed, 2007-08-22 at 08:27 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/22/07, Kaiwai Gardiner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2007-08-21 at 17:34 -0400, Brandorr wrote:
I am putting together an x96 server, and almost every component I look
at isn't listed on the HCL. (I'd prefer not to shop
I've had good results with Tyan boards, with Opterons on them. The speeds I've
seen on them have been outstanding. Multi-cpu systems worked out of the box
with them too.
It's sort of important to look at what a manufacturer has been doing in the
past with multi-cpu systems now that multi-core
Yeap, if it is a complete Intel setup, I've yet to see anyone have any
problems. Although cheering for the underdog (AMD) is a nice thing to
do, ultimately it is difficult to purchase from a company who refuses to
work with the OpenSolaris community to improve hardware support, both
processor,
I think the key thing here isn't that we don't have Adobe's reader but
that there are things lacking in the reader that we do ship (that the
Adobe reader does have).
Things I am aware of are:
* Fill in forms support
* Markup/Collab - this one got me when someone sent design review
comments
Aaron Wilson writes:
I found this thread via google. If I can do that then by chance some
Did you find the other lengthy threads about Acroread and Solaris via
google?
We've discussed this many times over. The discussion results in the
venting of many opinions, but no actual results. Some
The problem is with bringing this thread up again ... and again
... and again. Talking about it here is not likely to help, because
we're at best the choir. It's Adobe that needs to get the message.
Yes but we should also realize that the majority of people on the
Net or generally any forum
James Carlson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The problem is with bringing this thread up again ... and again
... and again. Talking about it here is not likely to help, because
we're at best the choir. It's Adobe that needs to get the message.
I cary this message to Adobe on every fair I attend
Joerg Schilling wrote:
I cary this message to Adobe on every fair I attend since the last 4+ years.
I tell them that Adobe is not viable any more and that PDF in whole is no
longer
trusworthy. This is because Adobe does not support all platforms anymore.
If we did _all_ do the same, Adbobe
Martin Bochnig wrote:
Because Adobe's promise of a *Portable*-DF is not true any longer, since
they only support WinNT_x86 / Linux_x86 and maybe Mac{ppc|x86} users for
circa 5 years now. All the other platforms are left out, more or less.
The market will judge them, earlier or later, their
Aaron Dailey wrote:
I'd like to propose Nigel Smith to be a core contributor in the
Opensolaris storage community. I've been impressed by his aid to the
community especially around iSCSI.
The voting procedures are here:
http://opensolaris.org/os/community/ogb/governance/
We need a
Hi Gurus,
I was trying to intercept the syscall clock_gettime in solaris kernel these
days, but I failed. I did my job in a Ultrasparc with solaris9 installed.
Having read the source code, I knew that clock_gettime enters into kernel via
the fast trap, with the trap # 0x27. From the kernel
Kaiwai Gardiner wrote:
On Tue, 2007-08-21 at 19:03 +0200, Joerg Schilling wrote:
Artem Kachitchkine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The mountable filesystem types might not all show the same content.
This is why it makes sense to mount everything.
Is that what the other three dominating OSes do?
Hello W.,
Sunday, August 19, 2007, 1:23:39 AM, you wrote:
but it won't unzip those parts first.
WWL SDM will automatically do the unzipping.
I wish that with Solaris/OpenSolaris ISO files it
would also combine
them in one file...
--
Best regards,
Robert Milkowski
Joerg Schilling wrote:
I did explain why it is not good enough.
You explained why UDF will be the wrong choice for making such
disks - but we're talking about mounting an existing disk here,
so if the disk has a UDF file system, it obviously can't have
any files so big they don't fit on UDF?
Aaron Dailey wrote:
I'd like to propose Nigel Smith to be a core contributor in the
Opensolaris storage community. I've been impressed by his aid to the
community especially around iSCSI.
The voting procedures are here:
http://opensolaris.org/os/community/ogb/governance/
We need a
I am trying to build a java server on my hp dv9000z
notebook running
nv_69 (soon to upgrade to nv-70b when the respin
comes out). The
purpose is to practice the examples included in the
Core JavaServer
Faces book by David Geary and Cay Horstmann.
Any suggestions? Or where is the
Alan Coopersmith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Joerg Schilling wrote:
I did explain why it is not good enough.
You explained why UDF will be the wrong choice for making such
disks - but we're talking about mounting an existing disk here,
so if the disk has a UDF file system, it obviously can't
Joerg Schilling wrote:
Alan Coopersmith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Joerg Schilling wrote:
I did explain why it is not good enough.
You explained why UDF will be the wrong choice for making such
disks - but we're talking about mounting an existing disk here,
so if the disk has a UDF file
Joerg Schilling wrote:
I did explain why it is not good enough.
You explained why UDF will be the wrong choice for making such
disks - but we're talking about mounting an existing disk here,
so if the disk has a UDF file system, it obviously can't have
any files so big they don't fit on UDF?
Hi!
Does anyone know what may currently be wrong with
http://src.opensolaris.org/ ?
New sources like
http://src.opensolaris.org/source/xref/onnv/onnv-gate/usr/src/lib/libshell/common/
are sometimes available, sometimes they disappear, then they appear
again and then they disappear again
Hi!
Does anyone know what may currently be wrong with
http://src.opensolaris.org/ ?
New sources like
http://src.opensolaris.org/source/xref/onnv/onnv-gate/usr/src/lib/libshell/common/
are sometimes available, sometimes they disappear, then they appear
again and then they disappear
On Wed, 22 Aug 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[ ... ]
Anyway, the original problem I ran into is a simpler one: that hsfs will
detect a filesystem as hsfs without then also wanting to mount it.
That, of course, won't do.
Casper
Thanks for bringing it back to the topic :)
Can anyone
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Also, we're discussing media sizes which we have not heard of; and the
speed of progress for optical media is not all that great.
CD: 1982 600MB/740MB
DVD: 1995(?)4.7GB - 8.5GB (dual layer) (25% increase year over year)
HD/Blu-ray
2006(?)
On Wed, 2007-08-22 at 20:23 +0100, Frank Hofmann wrote:
Now how to find out whether a medium doesn't allow writes ... another
problem, but again, workaround would be to simply mount all multiple
detections - but all readonly.
That sounds like the right answer if the disk slices overlap
Can anyone actually come up with reasons why HAL should not simply mount
all filesystem types found on such a medium, onto different mountpoints
(/media/hsfsmnt, /media/udfsmnt, ... ?) ?
I think that's been explained (more than once) earlier: it's not the
least surprise behavior and will
New sources ... are sometimes available, sometimes they disappear,
then they appear again and then they disappear again (and putting
links to these sources
There might be some sort of problem with the internal mirroring and load
balancing software. You'll probably get better results asking
Roland Mainz wrote:
Hi!
Does anyone know what may currently be wrong with
http://src.opensolaris.org/ ?
New sources like
http://src.opensolaris.org/source/xref/onnv/onnv-gate/usr/src/lib/libshell/common/
are sometimes available, sometimes they disappear, then they appear
again and
Frank Hofmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can anyone actually come up with reasons why HAL should not simply mount
all filesystem types found on such a medium, onto different mountpoints
(/media/hsfsmnt, /media/udfsmnt, ... ?) ?
This ha sbeen discussed before and Artem seems to have problems
What is a SIG? Special Interest Group.
Why should we consider SIGs for OpenSolaris?
At present the only level of abstraction that we have in
the OpenSolaris community is that of communities. We
have communities for high level concepts (networking)
and for very specific products (zfs) as well
RE: http://bugs.opensolaris.org/view_bug.do?bug_id=6470071
and
http://sunsolve.sun.com/search/document.do?assetkey=1-1-6470071-1
is there any way to get just a wee bit more information from that?
-
Bug ID: 6470071
Synopsis:
On Wed, 2007-08-22 at 13:09 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yeap, if it is a complete Intel setup, I've yet to see anyone have any
problems. Although cheering for the underdog (AMD) is a nice thing to
do, ultimately it is difficult to purchase from a company who refuses to
work with the
On Wed, 2007-08-22 at 14:20 +0200, Joerg Schilling wrote:
James Carlson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The problem is with bringing this thread up again ... and again
... and again. Talking about it here is not likely to help, because
we're at best the choir. It's Adobe that needs to get the
On Wed, 2007-08-22 at 14:33 +0200, Martin Bochnig wrote:
Joerg Schilling wrote:
I cary this message to Adobe on every fair I attend since the last 4
+ years.
I tell them that Adobe is not viable any more and that PDF in whole
is no longer
trusworthy. This is because Adobe does not
On Wed, 2007-08-22 at 09:23 -0700, Hugh McIntyre wrote:
Kaiwai Gardiner wrote:
On Tue, 2007-08-21 at 19:03 +0200, Joerg Schilling wrote:
Artem Kachitchkine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The mountable filesystem types might not all show the same
content.
This is why it makes sense to mount
On Wed, 2007-08-22 at 10:28 -0700, W. Wayne Liauh wrote:
I am trying to build a java server on my hp dv9000z
notebook running
nv_69 (soon to upgrade to nv-70b when the respin
comes out). The
purpose is to practice the examples included in the
Core JavaServer
Faces book by David
Kaiwai Gardiner writes:
Hmm, I'd say that more correctly, AMD has failed to step up and taken
ownership of ATI; they've bought them in terms of a transaction but the
management there are pussy-footing around the edge by refusing to by
their foot down and say, this is what you (at ati) are
On Thu, 2007-08-23 at 13:07 +1200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Kaiwai Gardiner writes:
Hmm, I'd say that more correctly, AMD has failed to step up and taken
ownership of ATI; they've bought them in terms of a transaction but the
management there are pussy-footing around the edge by refusing
On Wed, 2007-08-22 at 17:54 -0700, Artem Kachitchkine wrote:
Even
I'm sure you've put some special meaning in this word, but it's not
obvious what it is, given the context of this conversation.
with Data/Audio, it doens't work properly on Solaris - for
instance, one of the cd's I
On 8/22/07, Tim Scanlon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've had good results with Tyan boards, with Opterons on them. The speeds
I've seen on them have been outstanding. Multi-cpu systems worked out of the
box with them too.
I've heard got things about Tyan and AMD. (I have an old ASUS SK8N
1. Are you saying that it's OK to install nv_70 (in light of the all
the difficulties Dennis mentioned)?
Dennis is just being Dennis; I haven't noticed any of the problems he
has mentioned - and I'm so vanilla in my setup, it isn't funny. If there
was a major issue, it would have been
Actually I have submitted a bug - and waiting for it to be fixed.
Great.
http://bugs.opensolaris.org/view_bug.do?bug_id=6580744
Hmm, the responsible engineer marked it Incomplete:Need More Info,
which means he won't look at it until someone provides the missing info.
Unfortunately the
Hello,
I wanted to download SXCE snv_70 and went to this thread :
http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?messageID=147164tstart=0#147164
But after clicking on the CD download link I get this message at the Download
site:
The product you requested is not available at this time.
Hello,
try :
http://javashoplm.sun.com/ECom/docs/Welcome.jsp?StoreId=7PartDetailId=Sol-Express_b70-x86-SP-G-BTransactionId=try
see links at http://www.blastwave.org/docs/OpenSolaris/index.html
Dennis Clarke
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
And from the
Download Center (http://www.sun.com/download/)
-
Solaris Operating Systems
(http://www.sun.com/download/index.jsp?cat=Operating%20Systemstab=3subcat=Solaris%20Operating%20Systems)
-
Solaris Express Developer Edition
(http://www.sun.com/software/solaris/solaris-express/get.jsp)
On Wed, 2007-08-22 at 22:57 -0400, Dennis Clarke wrote:
1. Are you saying that it's OK to install nv_70 (in light of the all
the difficulties Dennis mentioned)?
Dennis is just being Dennis; I haven't noticed any of the problems he
has mentioned - and I'm so vanilla in my setup, it
Hi, Artem
We tried with a couple of CDs, and could not reproduce the bug. We
suspect that this bug can only be reproduced with the specific CD.
--Irene
Harry Lu wrote:
Subject:
Re: [osol-discuss] snv_70 odd behavior
Hi,
Sorry to top post - but this occurs on every cd which is mixed
data/audio. I have several of them; Nick Cave The Bad Seeds - Abbotoir
Blues/Lyre of Orpheus, Ben Harper - Both Sides of the Gun, Blind Boys of
Alabama. No errors occur on any of the other cds I have ripped.
Matthew
On Wed,
We tried with a couple of CDs, and could not reproduce the bug. We
suspect that this bug can only be reproduced with the specific CD.
Were your couple of CDs hybrid data and audio? Matthew claims it happens
on every hybrid he tried.
-Artem
___
On Wed, 2007-08-22 at 22:35 -0700, Artem Kachitchkine wrote:
We tried with a couple of CDs, and could not reproduce the bug. We
suspect that this bug can only be reproduced with the specific CD.
Were your couple of CDs hybrid data and audio? Matthew claims it
happens
on every hybrid he
The issue is that it doesn't occur with Grip - if it doesn't occur with
grip, which uses cdda2wav, and yet, occurs with Soundjuicer, then
something isn't quite kosher as to how soundjuicer interacts with the cd
drive.
It occurs with all hybrid cds when ripping with Soundjuicer and yet,
On Wed, 2007-08-22 at 22:46 -0700, Artem Kachitchkine wrote:
The issue is that it doesn't occur with Grip - if it doesn't occur
with
grip, which uses cdda2wav, and yet, occurs with Soundjuicer, then
something isn't quite kosher as to how soundjuicer interacts with
the cd
drive.
It
Question: with the loss of paranoia support, are we going to see a
release in the future which will provide support for error correction?
with ripping and Soundjuicer, will it be possible to keep ripping even
after an artifact is found in the ripping - aka an error due to a small
scratch,
58 matches
Mail list logo
