*And* when the crontab/at commands are run.
Which restarts cron unless there were no changes
made, it which case crontab is not read
No, crontab signals cron through /etc/cron.d/FIFO, which then re-reads the
crontab. cron is not restarted. This is easily verifiable through truss, and
On Thu, 2010-08-05 at 07:06 -0700, Erik Trimble wrote:
I know, but, it's Theo. And, that's all I'm gonna say on that topic. :-)
I'm not sure that the OpenSolaris codebase is sufficiently angry and
rude to be a *proper* Theo. *Cough* :)
___
Or you just pay $400/yr to have a paid license with
updates.
I wish you'd be careful throwing around absolute numbers like that. That value
is *your* quote. I'm happy for you that you work for a company that can demand
such a low support cost. It must be a large company, or at least a big
On Tue, 2010-07-13 at 10:29 -0700, Gary wrote:
Is it not possible with VirtualBox using internal networking
to be able to communicate with the FreeBSD jails?
I thought I'd replied to you, but the reply must have been lost. The
answer is no; see:
On Mon, 2010-05-31 at 20:22 -0700, lance tan wrote:
When I login to osol from another host in the LAN, obviously, the DNS server
couldn't reverse resolve the IP inside the LAN. But there is no way to
disable DNS reverse lookup by SunSSH.
No, but you can trick it. Toss the IPs in question
On Tue, 2010-03-30 at 06:47 -0700, Mike DeMarco wrote:
If you do not like a topic you can skip over it. I do not understand people
that have to get on a thread and trash it for being in the wrong place, Why
do you not just skip reading this thread if you do not agree with it being
here.
On Mon, 2010-01-25 at 21:03 +0100, dick hoogendijk wrote:
krb5.h should be in /usr/include/kerberosv5/. It's in the SUNWhea
package.
Yes, it was installed, but NOT found. After I symlinked it
to /usr/include the make went further but stopped after all with:
Remove the symlink, and try
On Mon, 2010-01-25 at 09:12 -0500, Kent Watsen wrote:
Oh, and I should add that the manually-created /var/run/openldap
directory, per the bug's remediation, is removed after every reboot -
something more is needed to keep the directory from disappearing...
/var/run is a tempfs filesystem,
On Fri, 2010-01-22 at 00:55 -0800, Alexander wrote:
Is it possible to have /etc on separate zfs pool in OpenSolaris?
The purpose is to have rw non-persistent main pool and rw persistent /etc...
As Shawn mentioned, you're probably setting yourself up for a world of
hurt.
What are you trying to
On Tue, 2009-12-15 at 02:45 -0800, Pradeep wrote:
I have setup a solaris x86 jumpstart server and trying to install
solaris on a client , intial tftp boot went fine . But while loading
miniroot installation is hanging . Iam trying to install solaris 10 update8
which has 64 bit
On Wed, 2009-11-18 at 11:05 +0100, Gaëtan Lehmann wrote:
Is it possible to freeze a zone and unfreeze it a few seconds later?
No; a zone isn't a virtual machine in the way you seem to be thinking.
There's only one kernel running. You can kill -STOP the processes (some
will ignore it) but you
On Fri, 2009-10-23 at 10:45 -0700, sridhar wrote:
just say yes or no to following questions to enable others to give solutions.
Yes
Have you made the network configuration manual?
Yes
Is your network configuration based on static ip or dhcp?
Yes No
For manual n/w config and static ip,
On Thu, 2009-10-22 at 04:38 -0700, sridhar wrote:
in my computer science graduation course. Since 1997, I have been
using windows and installing and reinstalling windows and several user
related applications. I created, modified and deleted several
That might be part of your problem. Unix
On Thu, 2009-10-22 at 04:54 -0700, sridhar wrote:
come out of commands man.
Please don't be patronizing and insulting. That won't do anything to
aid your point.
This is not 70s or 80s. Even for such a simple thing like creating
directory, don't make a user go thru this. I am the owner of
On Wed, 2009-10-21 at 04:11 -0700, Abid R S wrote:
i gave a command (passwd -d) on the bash shell with the root's role, as i
dont like to be prompted for passwd again and again.
now, i m not able to login to openSolaris, as its saying, password or userId
is not correct.
From the passwd
On Wed, 2009-10-21 at 10:55 -0500, Harry Putnam wrote:
Anyone recognize the problem I hit while installing
Term::ReadLine::Gnu
cc -c -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_TS_ERRNO -xO3
-xspace -xildoff -DVERSION=\1.19\ -DXS_VERSION=\1.19\ -KPIC
But of course this `log' is nearly useless. And is
beyond useless for
anything to do with connection errors like misfiring
cgi or whatever.
That's because that's not Apache's log, that's SMF's log as relates to its
duties starting/stopping Apache.
Why are the usefull logs not listed
Jürgen Keil wrote:
I suspect the reason the notebook is slow /
freezes is one or more of: the use of gzip compression;
the amount of memory; running the 32-bit kernel;
having only one cpu core; having a slower cpu;
using a slow notebook hdd.
On Thursday I had a 1.5G firefox dump core.
On Wed, 2009-07-22 at 16:53 +0200, Joerg Schilling wrote:
did someone succeed to install a 64 Bit Vista under VB?
I did try to do this with 3.0.2 and I get a message that there
was a hardware problem.
Not 3.0.2, but VB 2.2.4 is running Vista64 just fine at the moment on
b117. This is on an
On Fri, 2009-07-10 at 07:13 -0700, Marcelo H Majczak wrote:
Take note of what the current mountpoint is, then set a temporary one::
zfs get mountpoint rpool/ROOT/opensolaris
zfs set mountpoint=/mnt/xxx rpool/ROOT/opensolaris
This may not be necessary. Depending on the livecd, you can
On Fri, 2009-06-26 at 15:39 +0200, Sven Aluoor wrote:
I have a default Solaris 10 box with sendmail. How to configure to
send mails to external SMTP-host with custom originator (not
usern...@hostname.domain)
I believe you should research genericstable. There is plenty of
documentation
On Thu, 2008-08-07 at 13:45 +0200, Joerg Schilling wrote:
The restore from the blastwave.berlios.de is complete now, the restore
state is the state from 2 hours before the original data went away.
Out of curiosity, how large is the repository?
___
On Wed, 2008-07-02 at 07:32 -0700, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
So to make you happiest here Sun should kill Solaris and switch to Linux?
I think you've missed a lot of his earlier posts. He'd be happiest if
Sun killed Solaris and switched to *IRIX*.
___
On Tue, 2007-09-18 at 19:03 -0700, Richard Eng wrote:
A friend of mine (a Solaris professional) has strongly recommended using
Solaris instead of Linux. I must confess, I'm a bit trepidatious. I don't
really have too much time to mount yet another learning curve. So I have some
basic
On Tue, 2007-08-14 at 06:44 -0700, stefan bejanof wrote:
How to connetc two laptops with bluetooth???
+phentermine no prescription
What the hell is it with the obnoxious drug spam attached to every one
of your posts?
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing
On Wed, 2007-07-25 at 12:37 -0700, UNIX admin wrote:
That's correct - they do, and that also goes along with my previous point:
they prefer Windows because they are computer illiterate.
This is a dangerous statement. It allows you to pigeonhole anyone who
might like Windows for some reason,
The only thing is getting into the people's skulls
that they *don't* need a desktop, and that the
network is the computer.
You need to seriously re-examine that network is the computer chant, and how
well it jives with the world you've described... where you've robbed the
average person of
On Tue, 2007-07-24 at 11:35 -0700, UNIX admin wrote:
Well, why must it be on the Internet?
Can't we have a server that sits in a living room or in a closet or in the
basement, which stores all our data on encrypted disks, centrally, secured by
ZFS?
Who builds and installs that server in the
On Fri, 2007-07-20 at 10:25 -0400, Chrysek W. wrote:
But is there a way to install zone with its own /usr that is not taken
from globalzone right?
What are you actually trying to accomplish? A separate /usr runs the
risk of getting out of sync with the global zone (and perhaps even the
On Wed, 2007-07-04 at 19:01 +0100, a b wrote:
I might be an old-fashioned gray-beard candidate, but some things that
we're still nurturing in UNIX tradition really are obsolete and need
to be axed. This is one of those.
There's a number of reasons to chop up a single-disk machine into
multiple
On Fri, 2007-06-15 at 06:32 -0700, UNIX admin wrote:
1. SPARC (and nowdays AMD and intel) processors support a so-called no
execution stack bit, and this bit is set to 1 by default;
what that means is, you can't execute any malicious code that you put on the
stack, the hardware won't allow
By the way, OpenSolaris does not run on the Sun v215. OpenBSD does.
How Open is OpenSolaris if it does not even run on Sun's own hardware?
Not very, I suppose.
Theo has a poor understanding of Open. Which is why this response
isn't much of a surprise at all.
On Wed, 2007-03-28 at 15:36 -0300, Javier O. Augusto wrote:
MC wrote:
Sometimes choice is bad.
erm, when?
Well, to put it most simply: when the chooser doesn't take
responsibility for the choices they make. Something most of us in the
IT industry are familiar with, I'd think... especially
On Mon, 2007-03-26 at 11:09 -0700, Durga Deep Tirunagari wrote:
But how do I get the return value of the binary, I know that exec family of
functions won't return any value ?. Is there any way i can get the return
value of mybinary after it executes ?. Say if mybinary returns 1 ( failure )
On Tue, 2007-03-13 at 16:10 +, Darren J Moffat wrote:
I very very strongly disagree, it is up to each individual to choose
what risks they want to take. Do they want a newer release but with
While I very much agree with this, I think the reality should be
acknowledged that if you have to
/net/etc/auto.net
-fstype=nfs,hard,intr,nodev,tcp,rsize=8192,wsize=8192,nosuid,actimeo=0
That rsize and wsize is very small compared to the defaults/recommendations
I've seen (ie: Oracle's documents). Can I ask why? I'm in a mixed RH/Sol
environment too, and I'm wondering for the sake
36 matches
Mail list logo
