On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 10:37 AM, Karel Gardas karel.gar...@centrum.cz wrote:
Hello,
thanks for your reply. I'm trying to reproduce the same error on vanilla
2010.11 installation and to my surprise I'm not able to. What I need to do is:
export PATH=/usr/xpg4/bin:$PATH
and then I'm able to
On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 10:25 AM, Richard L. Hamilton rlha...@smart.net wrote:
[snip]
My impression is that a number of the AST tools have picked up the
major options previously unique to the GNU tools, while trying to retain
better standards compliance. Assuming that to be true, I think
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 3:15 PM, Dave Johnson
dave.johnson.inqu...@googlemail.com wrote:
[snip]
Here is the evidence:
Evidence 1:
- Project cooperation with ksh project withdrawn
- GNU commands as replacements are the future
-- Forwarded message --
From: John Sonnenschein
Hi!
Does anyone know out-of-the-head whether tmpfs supports ACLs - and if
yes - which type(s) of ACLs (e.g. NFSv4/ZFS, old POSIX draft ACLs
etc.) are supported by tmpfs ?
Bye,
Roland
--
__ . . __
(o.\ \/ /.o) roland.ma...@nrubsig.org
\__\/\/__/ MPEG specialist, CJAVASunUnix
Norm Jacobs wrote:
Roland Mainz wrote:
Does anyone know out-of-the-head whether tmpfs supports ACLs - and if
yes - which type(s) of ACLs (e.g. NFSv4/ZFS, old POSIX draft ACLs
etc.) are supported by tmpfs ?
I have some vague recollection that tmpfs doesn't support ACLs snd it
appears
Ian Collins wrote:
Roland Mainz wrote:
Norm Jacobs wrote:
Roland Mainz wrote:
Does anyone know out-of-the-head whether tmpfs supports ACLs - and if
yes - which type(s) of ACLs (e.g. NFSv4/ZFS, old POSIX draft ACLs
etc.) are supported by tmpfs ?
I have some vague recollection
Robert Thurlow wrote:
Roland Mainz wrote:
Ok... does that mean that I have to create a ZFS filesystem to actually
test ([1]) an application which modifies ZFS/NFSv4 ACLs or are there any
other options ?
By all means, test with ZFS. But it's easy to do that:
# mkfile 64m /zpool.file
Hi!
2009-08-22: ksh93-integration update 2 tarballs for Solaris 11
Nevada+OpenSolaris/Indiana
These tarballs ([2]) are intended to be installed over an existing
Solaris Nevada/Indiana/OpenSolaris = B110 i386 or SPARC installation
and provide ksh93t+_20090505 and the content described in
Al Hopper wrote:
On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 1:16 AM, Al Hopper a...@logical-approach.com
wrote:
On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 12:38 AM, Al Hopper
a...@logical-approach.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 7:58 PM, Roland Mainz
roland.ma...@nrubsig.org wrote:
Does anyone know what's wrong
Hi!
2009-05-11: ksh93-integration update 2 tarballs for Solaris 11
Nevada+OpenSolaris/Indiana
These tarballs ([2]) are intended to be installed over an existing
Solaris Nevada/Indiana/OpenSolaris = B110 i386 or SPARC
installation and provide ksh93t+_20090505 and the content
described in
Hi!
2009-04-20: ksh93-integration update 2 tarballs for Solaris 11
Nevada+OpenSolaris/Indiana
These tarballs ([2]) are intended to be installed over an existing
Solaris Nevada/Indiana/OpenSolaris = B110 i386 or SPARC
installation and provide ksh93t+_20090310 and the content
described in
Martin Bochnig wrote:
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 5:25 PM, Josh Hurst joshhu...@gmail.com wrote:
On 3/25/09, Dennis Clarke dcla...@blastwave.org wrote:
[snip]
Flame wars should be fought privately, if at all.
speaking_as_list_admin
* First:
I would _STRONGLY_ prefer to keep all non-technical
Miles Nordin wrote:
You wish to talk to Roland Mainz, Glenn Fowler and
Jennifer Pioch
then. They have opensource replacements for
/usr/bin/sed,
/usr/xpg4/bin/sed, /usr/bin/tail, /usr/xpg4/bin/tail,
/usr/bin/tr and
/usr/xpg4/bin/tr.
is this a joke?
No, this is no joke. I am
Alan Coopersmith wrote:
Joerg Schilling wrote:
Another issue: Xsun did use mmap() to allocate bigger parts of memory in the
X server. If big memory leaking program like netscape died in former times,
Xsun did shrink. Today, we have firefox that itself allocates less memory
than
before
Hi!
Irek: I'm setting the Reply-To: to opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
... I would be really nice to keep the stone throwing out of the
ksh93-integration-disc...@opensolars.org list - we're trying to get
technical stuff done in this list and not rant about the history of
Solaris or
Mark Martin wrote:
[Resent for Reply-all]
On Sat, Oct 18, 2008 at 6:03 PM, Martin Bochnig mar...@martux.org
wrote:
+1
Except that it would be nice if somebody would make the
Polaris port functional, before starting a new port.
Also, why MIPS, not ARM? Isn't MIPS
ken mays wrote:
[snip]
Mark Martin wrote:
[snip]
Assuming you only use UFS and cut-down some system
tuneables Solaris can
run on a 64MB machine (my Ultra5 only has 128MB now after
one of the
DIMMs failed and it still works fine with CDE). The
problems start if
you want to run some
Hi!
Does anyone remeber a component of Solaris (OS/Netm SFWNV, Studio or
punchin) which produces the following kind of at jobs:
-- snip --
From r...@terror.alquiekquak.org Tue Dec 16 00:00:55 2008
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 00:00:53 +0100 (CET)
From: Super-User r...@terror.alquiekquak.org
To:
Al Hopper wrote:
Please bear with us as we find/fix the hardware issues currently
causing constipation at www.genunix.org. Wiki users - don't worry -
we have current backups. But please allow at least 12 hours for the
site to be restored to normal operation.
I guess our uptime record of
Cyril Plisko wrote:
On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 1:28 PM, Roland Mainz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Al Hopper wrote:
PS: belenix.org runs on genunix.org infrastructure but is running on
other hardware and is unaffected by this outage.
Was svn.genunix.org somehow be affected, too ?
Its a zone
Hi!
2008-11-14: ksh93 update tarballs for Solaris Nevada+Indiana
These tarballs are intended to be installed over an existing OpenSolaris
= B84 i386 or SPARC installation and provide ast-ksh.2008-11-04
(ksh93t_20081104) and match PSARC/2008/094 (ksh93 Update 1 ;
Hi!
2008-08-10: ksh93 update tarballs for Solaris Nevada+Indiana
These tarballs are intended to be installed over an existing OpenSolaris
= B84 i386 or SPARC installation and provide ast-ksh.2008-07-25
(ksh93t_20080725) and match PSARC/2008/094 (ksh93 Update 1 ;
Richard L. Hamilton wrote:
[snip]
Hmmm... that'd be a close shave. Having worked with
UltraSPARC T2s quite a bit, I'd say that the T2 is
still pretty weak for the desktop workloads,
precisely because of his single-thread performance.
You'd have to have software that was highly optimized
Ian Collins wrote:
Herschel Krustofsky writes:
I agree completely with Bruno, getting the distribution out there properly
is a showstopper.
This subject comes up over and over (and has for years) and the answer
remains the same.
Why do you think Indiana was created?
AFAIK this issue
Kathy Slattery wrote:
Currently, I'm using a customized version of Epic
to author the
book. The source isn't available yet, but I plan to
move it into
mercurial after the August 8th release.
May I ask for any links to that soft, google search
does not give my any reasonable
Dennis Clarke wrote:
On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 11:27 PM, Ming Kin Lai [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a feeling that Sun has abandoned maintaining Solaris, and shifted
its resources to OpenSolaris. Well, that's good news to people here, I
guess.
So, can I discuss things about Solaris 10
Hi!
2008-06-24: ksh93 update tarballs for Solaris Nevada = B84+Indiana
These tarballs are intended to be installed over an existing
OpenSolaris = B84 i386 or SPARC installation and provide
ksh93t-_20080614 and match PSARC/2008/094 (ksh93 Update 1 ;
Hi!
2008-06-17: ksh93 update tarballs for Solaris Nevada+Indiana
These tarballs are intended to be installed over an existing OpenSolaris
= B84 i386 or SPARC installation and provide ksh93t-_20080614 and match
PSARC/2008/094 (ksh93 Update 1 ;
Dirk Wetter wrote:
Am 10.03.2008 09:51, Joep Vesseur schrieb:
On 03/10/08 01:41, Roland Mainz wrote:
Is there any status update ? Did you hit any major problems ?
On the list for integration any time now (I can't say which build since I'm
not the one who will put
Gary Winiger wrote:
--
X-Sun-Data-Type: text
X-Sun-Data-Description: text
X-Sun-Data-Name: text
X-Sun-Charset: us-ascii
X-Sun-Content-Lines: 8
It's done! :-)
See attached commit notification email. Flag day notification is
Hi!
More or less an update to my original VMware's rock around the
clock...-posting
(http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/opensolaris-discuss/2006-March/013848.html):
1. In Solaris 11 B83a and B84 the VMware tools no longer sync the time
with the host OS (I'm not using ntpdate to slew the
Hi!
2008-02-29: ksh93 update tarballs for OpenSolaris
These tarballs are intended to be installed over an existing OpenSolaris
= B72 + Indiana distribution i386 or SPARC installation and provide
ksh93s+_20080202 (the content matches PSARC/2008/094
Moritz Willers wrote:
On 29 Jan 2008, at 22:59, Derek Cicero wrote:
Please find the links to SXCE Build 81 at
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/downloads/on/
/IMPORTANT:/
The SDLC has changed how the downloads works.
Now you choose the Platform first and then see a list of
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The ksh93/bash holy war is off-topic for pkg-discuss.
This list is for the discussion of the development of the packaging system.
Indiana-discuss, or perhaps alt.fetish on USENET, would be a better
forum for this thread.
Or just remind people (either via email
Hi!
2007-11-05: ksh93 _update tarballs_ for OpenSolaris = B72
These tarballs are intended to be installed over an existing OpenSolaris
i386 or SPARC installation (= Nevada B72) to update the provided ksh93
installation to ksh93sü_20071101.
Note that the binaries are provided for testing
Hi!
[If you run Solaris 11 = B72 please ignore this]
A new set of tarballs containing an OS/Net version of ksh93 [1] (based
on ksh93s+_beta_20070418 [2]) is now available from
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/project/ksh93-integration/downloads/2007-10-31/
These tarballs are intended to be
Glynn Foster wrote:
I'm very pleased to announce that the first milestone of Project Indiana is
now
available - called OpenSolaris Developer Preview.
It's available for download at
http://dlc.sun.com/osol/indiana/downloads/current/in-preview.iso
[snip]
Congrats to all! :-)
I only
Hi!
Just curious: Would be there any interest to create a sendmail and/or
mail-related community or project which bundles all the sendmailmail
tool activities (e.g. sendmail maintaince, updates, mailx things,
building a managing sendmail on Solaris (+SMF) FAQ etc. (the idea came
up today
Roland Mainz wrote:
Does anyone here run Solaris 11/Nevada B72 on a M4000 ? I need some
feedback whether it runs (more or less) stable on that type of
machine...
... does anyone have a M4000 or M5000 around to test this, please ?
Bye,
Roland
--
__ . . __
(o.\ \/ /.o) [EMAIL
Brandorr wrote:
On 9/28/07, nospam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OLPC (One Laptop Per Child) project had released XO Laptops for the public
using G1G1 (Buy 2 Get 1).
One laptop will be sent to the buyer, another laptop will be sent to a
child in developing country.
Unfortunately the XO
Hi!
Does anyone here run Solaris 11/Nevada B72 on a M4000 ? I need some
feedback whether it runs (more or less) stable on that type of
machine...
Bye,
Roland
--
__ . . __
(o.\ \/ /.o) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
\__\/\/__/ MPEG specialist, CJAVASunUnix programmer
/O /==\ O\ TEL
Roland Mainz wrote:
Does anyone know whether bugs.opensolaris.org is sick again ? I'm
missing two bug reports:
1. DTrace causes system hang
and
2. DTrace ksh scripts
Can anyone please check what happened to these bugs ?
Erm... did anyone see these bug reports somewhere or should I
Alan Coopersmith wrote:
UNIX admin wrote:
In fact, Sun, under this agreement has access to all and
any Microsoft technology, and is free to implement that
technology in Solaris in any way Sun pleases!
I've never seen the agreement, and I'm sure anyone who has will not
be commenting on
Hi!
Does anyone know whether bugs.opensolaris.org is sick again ? I'm
missing two bug reports:
1. DTrace causes system hang
and
2. DTrace ksh scripts
Can anyone please check what happened to these bugs ?
Bye,
Roland
--
__ . . __
(o.\ \/ /.o) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
kind of version
# counter to handle incompatible changes to the history file format)
typeset -r history_file=${HOME}/.shnote/history0.txt
USAGE=$'
[-?\n@(#)\$Id: shnote (Roland Mainz) 2007-09-18 \$\n]
[-author?Roland Mainz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[+NAME?shnote - read/write text data to internet
client identifer
typeset -r http_user_agent=shtwitter/ksh93 (2007-09-14; $(uname -s -r -p)
USAGE=$'
[-?\n@(#)\$Id: shtwitter (Roland Mainz) 2007-09-14 \$\n]
[-author?Roland Mainz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[+NAME?shtwitter - read/write text data to internet clipboards]
[+DESCRIPTION?\bshtwitter\b
Hi!
Does anyone know what may currently be wrong with
http://src.opensolaris.org/ ?
New sources like
http://src.opensolaris.org/source/xref/onnv/onnv-gate/usr/src/lib/libshell/common/
are sometimes available, sometimes they disappear, then they appear
again and then they disappear again
John Levon wrote:
New binaries and sources are available for the OpenSolaris on Xen project. For
more details:
http://blogs.sun.com/levon/entry/solaris_xen_update
Is there anywhere a webrev for the changes ?
Bye,
Roland
--
__ . . __
(o.\ \/ /.o) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
\__\/\/__/
Hi!
A new set of tarballs containing an OS/Net version of ksh93 [1] (based
on ksh93s+_beta_20070418 [2]) is now available from
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/project/ksh93-integration/downloads/2007-07-14/
These tarballs are intended to be installed over an existing OpenSolaris
i386 or
Andy Tucker wrote:
On 3/6/06, Roland Mainz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm hitting some problems with Solaris guest installations in VMware
(e.g. Solaris being the guest in a VMware VM):
Sometimes the clock is going out-of-sync. I configured xntpd to
counteract these issues - but suddenly
Alan Coopersmith wrote:
William James wrote:
No one from Sun's compiler team did bother to respond to my emails.
They may not care about good customer support but I do. I think the
best way is now to move forward and create a mailing list at
opensolaris.org
The most logical place to do
Dev Mazumdar wrote:
The rumors are true, we're planning on open sourcing Open Sound (on June
14th). We will be offering the source code under CDDL to Solaris and GPLv2
for Linux BSD, OpenServer etc.
At this time, we'd like to propose that Open Sound be started as a project
under the
Hi!
Today I stumbled over http://blogs.sun.com/olympus/ and
http://blogs.sun.com/samqfs/ (erm, this is not thought as offense
against the QFS or Olympus people but AFAIK group/project blogs should
be in the project-specific blogging areas at opensolaris.org and not at
blogs.sun.com) ...
W. Wayne Liauh wrote:
Today I stumbled over http://blogs.sun.com/olympus/
and
http://blogs.sun.com/samqfs/ (erm, this is not
thought as offense
against the QFS or Olympus people but AFAIK
group/project blogs should
be in the project-specific blogging areas at
opensolaris.org and
Artem Kachitchkine wrote:
somehow this feels not good that products start to have blogs
It can be interesting to meet real people behind a product share their
views from the other side of the fence.
Right... and I don't disagree with that... but somehow the idea that
products start to
Ted Pogue wrote:
Project Overview:
I propose the creation of a project on opensolaris.org, to bring to the
community Solaris host-based data services; namely the Storage Archive
Manager or SAM and the Solaris shared file system QFS. These data
services exist today and are
Hi!
[Sorry for the repost but the original annoucement had a few dates/etc.
wrong... ;-( ]
A new set of tarballs containing an OS/Net version of ksh93 [1] (based
on ksh93s+_beta_20070418 [2]) is now available from
Hi!
A new set of tarballs containing an OS/Net version of ksh93 [1] (based
on ksh93s+_beta_20070418 [2]) is now available from
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/project/ksh93-integration/downloads/2007-04-19/
These tarballs are intended to be installed over an existing OpenSolaris
i386 or
Hi!
Is it possible that bugs.opensolaris.org is loosing bugs (again) ?
I am missing two bug reports:
1. usr/src/cmd/perl/ build installs Subversion directories (.svn) in
the proto area (note that this is not the exact title). That one was
filed seveal days ago and since noone
Hi!
Just a quick announcement that the shell project is now open.
What are we are doing ?
The shell project should investigate and execute
improvements related to shells and the shell environment in
(Open-)Solaris:
* Improve usuablity for plain users, including beginners
and
Hi!
My Solaris 11/B48 Ultra5 sometimes (while doing lots of disk I/O) hangs
for a few seconds and then recovers while logging the following lines to
/var/adm/messages
-- snip --
$ tail /var/adm/messages
Apr 2 02:50:37 jupiterb48 uata: [ID 464412 kern.warning] WARNING:
timeout: reset
Hi!
A new set of tarballs containing an OS/Net version of ksh93 [1] (based
on ksh93s_final_20070111 [2]) is now available from
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/project/ksh93-integration/downloads/2007-03-18/
These tarballs are intended to be installed over an existing OpenSolaris
i386 or
or any of the other related issues. We're now working on getting
ksh93 integrated into (Open-)Solaris and trying to leave the old
problems behind us.
Thanks! :-)
John Plocher wrote:
Josh Hurst wrote:
WIll Sun FIX dtksh? Both experts in this field - David Korn and Roland
Mainz have complained
Laszlo (Laca) Peter wrote:
So the /usr/gnu proposal[1] was approved by PSARC. Obviously, the
reason for defining /usr/gnu wasn't theoretical -- it allows moving
GNU packages from /usr/sfw to /usr or /usr/gnu and it helps us
integrating more GNU packages into Solaris. We have already seen
Mike Kupfer wrote:
Eric == Eric Boutilier [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Eric ... In fact Gmane already is carrying some opensolaris lists (I
Eric don't know the who/when/why)...
There should be some discussion of this in the opensolaris-discuss
archives for July 2005 (gmane and
Stephen Hahn wrote:
* Roland Mainz [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-02-18 15:10]:
Is there a way to prevent things like the posting below ? For example is
it possibe to reconfigure Jive to allow postings only for people who are
subscribed to that list or make sure that such postings are queued
Alan Burlison wrote:
Stephen Hahn wrote:
Not easily, no. I'll look at the moderation idea, but the
subscribers only request contradicts the aims of most legitimate
forum posters.
Another alternative would be to moderate the first few posts from new
registrants. This should stop
Hi!
Is there a way to prevent things like the posting below ? For example is
it possibe to reconfigure Jive to allow postings only for people who are
subscribed to that list or make sure that such postings are queued for
moderation by the list admins automatically ?
Original
Alan Coopersmith wrote:
Doug Scott wrote:
Thanks for the explanation. This explains what is happening to
firefox. Is Xorg
looking into the problem, as it can be a real pain having to restart X
every so often.
I don't know of anyone at X.Org looking into the problem since it's pretty
Rich Teer wrote:
On Mon, 29 Jan 2007, Bruno Jargot wrote:
I think it's better to stick with bzip2 archives. They need less
bandwidth and less room on disks. Using gzip again would be a step
backwards. Really.
I resepctfully disagree. Casper and I discussed this ages ago (I
forget
Martin Bochnig wrote:
Rich Teer wrote:
On Mon, 29 Jan 2007, Bruno Jargot wrote:
I think it's better to stick with bzip2 archives. They need less
bandwidth and less room on disks. Using gzip again would be a step
backwards. Really.
I resepctfully disagree. Casper and I discussed this
Eric Enright wrote:
On 1/29/07, Bruno Jargot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 1/29/07, Michelle Olson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Rich,
[snip]
Waiting a little extra time to receive the archive is far better than
waiting a lot of extra time to unpack it.
Offtopic: Both gzip and bzip2 run much
ken mays wrote:
What is the status of the Opensolaris Power PC port?
Is the project
still active? There were not any status reports or
updates in the last
months.
Bruno
-
Cyril, PPC for Solaris community lead, can best answer
that question over in
Martin Bochnig wrote:
Roland Mainz wrote:
I vote to use bzip2 to compress all the developer sources... usually the
disks are slower than uncompressing the tarball anyway...
Not if the uncompressed archives are bigger than, say, 100MB.
Try it out on a U60 with 1x300MHz and let's see if your
Michelle Olson wrote:
Thanks for this message, really good to hear from you.
I will ask the gatekeeper to make this change if there
are more folks who prefer gzip to bzip2--you are the first to ask.
What about providing both gzip and bzip2 tarballs ?
Bye,
Roland
P.S.: Would it be
Stephen Lau wrote:
Michelle Olson wrote:
Thanks for this message, really good to hear from you.
I will ask the gatekeeper to make this change if there
are more folks who prefer gzip to bzip2--you are the
first to ask.
My personal preference is for bzip2 - but that's just cause I
Eric Enright wrote:
On 1/29/07, Roland Mainz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Michelle Olson wrote:
Thanks for this message, really good to hear from you.
I will ask the gatekeeper to make this change if there
are more folks who prefer gzip to bzip2--you are the first to ask.
What about
Dennis Clarke wrote:
ken mays wrote:
[snip]
5. Support for PowerPC G4 to G5 (PPC750GX)
Will Apple G3 machines still be supported ?
probably not for a lng time
Why (I still have the chance to get an older Apple G3-based IMac...
question is whether it makes sense to buy it...) ?
Ienup Sung wrote:
Yes, we have numerous locales with different codesets. Solaris 10,
as an example, we have 165 locales with 23 different codesets.
In many cases, codesets use quite similar representation forms and yet
the mappings between the code point values and actual characters/glyphs
Hi!
Does anyone know when the B56 sources will be released ? Seems that this
may be the version we'll pick for final code review of the
ksh93-integration tree...
Bye,
Roland
--
__ . . __
(o.\ \/ /.o) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
\__\/\/__/ MPEG specialist, CJAVASunUnix programmer
/O
John Sonnenschein wrote:
Following the official proposal guidelines, I'd like to take this opportunity
to propose that we collaborate with the KDE e.V. and kde-core-devel in order
to integrate KDE as an OpenSolaris project
Ok, lets refine this proposal:
1. Deliver KDE3 to /usr/kde3/ and
Holger Berger wrote:
On 1/17/07, Eric Boutilier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Need clarification please. Are John Sonnenschein and Roland Mainz
co-owners of the KDE proposal now?
I remember the day when it was considered 'impossible' to convince Sun
to introduce ksh93 to Solaris and somehow
Hi!
[Ok... this may be horrible offtopic for OpenSolaris... but maybe there
are some people who played around with Roller (which runs
http://bugs.sun.com) and other Blog engines and may be able to help]
Does anyone have a recommendation for a blogging engine which accepts
DocBook/XML as
Martin Bochnig wrote:
Martin Bochnig wrote:
Peter C. Norton wrote:
On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 02:59:55AM +0100, Martin Bochnig wrote:
[snip]
How does nisinit get names from dns even if your system is set to
resolve via NIS+?
Maybe you mean, Roland would want to clone the methods in which
Martin Bochnig wrote:
Roland Mainz wrote:
[snip]
Normal users with limited privileges may naturally have no - or
limited - access.
Didn't you find any help in the man pages for NIS, NIS+ and LDAP?
That was not the goal. The matching scripts should be able to operate
regardless how the backend
James Carlson wrote:
Peter C. Norton writes:
I think he wants to be able to add a flag, i.e. -nssvc nis, -nssvc
dns, -nssvc 'ldap', etc. to getent that will dlopen the appropriate
nss_blah library instead of following the lookup in nsswitch.conf so
that the lookup to a particular database
Darren J Moffat wrote:
Roland Mainz wrote:
Is there a nameservice-independent way to obtain the values for
user_attr and publickey from a shell script (if not I would propose
to add a extension to getent) ?
publickey no there isn't.
For user_attr it depends which values you want.
I
Cyril Plisko wrote:
[snip]
26 * Copyright (c) 2005 SilverStorm Technologies, Inc. All rights reserved.
27 *
28 * This software is available to you under a choice of one of two
29 * licenses. You may choose to be licensed under the terms of the GNU
30 * General Public License
Peter Tribble wrote:
On 1/1/07, wb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a /tmp FS for swap, and a really big file crout*
inside. The /tmp was 95% up.
I decided to remove the crout file.
The problem, is the /tmp is not decreasing, but still
growing.
How could I make it decrease?
Hi!
Is there a nameservice-independent way to obtain the values for
user_attr and publickey from a shell script (if not I would propose
to add a extension to getent) ?
Bye,
Roland
--
__ . . __
(o.\ \/ /.o) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
\__\/\/__/ MPEG specialist, CJAVASunUnix
Martin Bochnig wrote:
Martin Bochnig wrote:
Roland Mainz wrote:
Is there a nameservice-independent way to obtain the values for
user_attr and publickey from a shell script (if not I would propose
to add a extension to getent) ?
Maybe getuserattr() or getauthattr() ?
Plus getpublickey
Martin Bochnig wrote:
Martin Bochnig wrote:
Martin Bochnig wrote:
Maybe getuserattr() or getauthattr() ?
Plus getpublickey()
Or don't those work with files as NS ??
*shrug*
Exclusively from a shell script, no C?
Yes...
Can't you analyse the files in /etc directly then?
No,
Josh Hurst wrote:
On 12/29/06, Dennis Clarke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What do we have for SPAM filters ? Just curious.
The whole list system appears to be damaged. The whole ksh93 list
archive is gone. Maybe a hack?
No, the the machine's filesystem was just full (don't worry, the data
Joerg Schilling wrote:
does anybody know why diff is not compiled in large file mode?
No, but I guess noone expected that source files get that big... :-)
... what's the bug id for the problem ?
Bye,
Roland
--
__ . . __
(o.\ \/ /.o) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
\__\/\/__/ MPEG specialist,
Felix Schulte wrote:
On 12/20/06, Felix Schulte [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12/19/06, Richard L. Hamilton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's not something one is supposed to take advantage of!
From vfork(2) (albeit admittedly the SX version of the man page):
The vfork() function is
Stephen Lau wrote:
Roland Mainz wrote:
It seems all the list archives are gone from mail.opensolaris.org - for
example http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/ksh93-integration-discuss/
only shows an empty directory instead of the archived messages... ;-((
Can anyone please check what
Felix Schulte wrote:
On 12/19/06, Richard L. Hamilton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's not something one is supposed to take advantage of!
From vfork(2) (albeit admittedly the SX version of the man page):
The vfork() function is deprecated. Its sole legitimate use as a prelude to
an
Ignacio Marambio Catán wrote:
. * * . * .* .
. * . .*
President, * . . /\ ( . . *
Rite Online Inc.
Hi!
It seems all the list archives are gone from mail.opensolaris.org - for
example http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/ksh93-integration-discuss/
only shows an empty directory instead of the archived messages... ;-((
Can anyone please check what is going wrong there ?
Bye,
Hi!
A new set of tarballs containing an OS/Net version of ksh93 [1] (based
on ksh93s_alpha_20061207 [2]) is now available from
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/project/ksh93-integration/downloads/2006-12-14/
These tarballs are intended to be installed over an existing OpenSolaris
i386/AMD64
1 - 100 of 297 matches
Mail list logo
