Hi All -
We are very excited to announce the Apps of Steel Challenge - If you're
a student, developer, system administrator, or someone who just likes to
develop packages, use your talents and participate for a chance to win a
Toshiba OpenSolaris laptop!
Submit the best package that meets
Aw man, the contest started on April 11th, but nobody announced it here until
April 13th? That gives everybody else a two day head start over me :-(
I think I need to start occasionally hanging out more with all of the
Indianites at OpenSolaris.com since I think I'm in the minority of people at
Anon Y Mous wrote:
(2) As far as I can tell there's no way of doing automated / scripted
installations of 2008.11 like you can with kickstart in Solaris 10. This
combined with points #1 and #3 makes it almost impossible for me to use
2008.11 on production servers even though I actually
* Anon Y Mous (system5u...@yahoo.com) wrote:
Aw man, the contest started on April 11th, but nobody announced it
here until April 13th? That gives everybody else a two day head start
over me :-(
I think I need to start occasionally hanging out more with all of the
Indianites at
Have you filed bugs on the dtrace toolkit issues (if in fact they
actually exist)? I'd be pretty surprised if they didn't work. The
networking stack in OpenSolaris is identical to the one in SXCE as is
dtracetoolkit.
I filed it two months ago...
SUNWmfrun is available in the /dev repo starting with build 110.
There were licensing issues to be resolved that held it out previously.
Thanks for the tip on the auto-installer!
Is the root cause of the problem that SUNWmfrun contains some kind of
cryptography module that can't be exported
Anon Y Mous wrote:
Is the root cause of the problem that SUNWmfrun contains some kind of
cryptography module that can't be exported under U.S. laws or is it more of
an issue with a third-party company that owns intellectual property or part
of the code that prevents free re-distribution?
Anon Y Mous wrote:
Also, does flar create not work well with the ZFS version used in 2008.11 and
that's why it's not in there? Or is flar supposed to be replaced by some
feature in ZFS? Or is the flar code owned by a third party that won't allow
free redistribution of it? I haven't heard any
* Shawn Walker (swal...@opensolaris.org) wrote:
Anon Y Mous wrote:
Also, does flar create not work well with the ZFS version used in 2008.11
and that's why it's not in there? Or is flar supposed to be replaced by some
feature in ZFS? Or is the flar code owned by a third party that won't
Sorry - I don't know anything about flar or flash archives - never used them
or worked on them.
Just thought I'd put it out there and ask if anyone had tried building flar
functionality from source code on Indiana yet.
I know I tried building the lsof command from source on Indiana and I
On 15 Apr 2009, at 21:36, Anon Y Mous wrote:
(4) I really liked the dark blue colors in the Indiana 2008.05
default theme but now in 2008.11, all the default background colors
are way too bright. It's really painful to stare at the background
screen for a long time when you're using the
On Wed, 2009-04-15 at 13:36 -0700, Anon Y Mous wrote:
(1) it doesn't make it easy to do a minimum server install with just a
command line and Apache and Tomcat or
just Lightttpd or just a command line and a PostFix e-mail server (no GUI!!!
yeah you can do svcadm disable gdm,
but
12 matches
Mail list logo
