Re: [openssl.org #29] -Wl,-Bsymbolic in 0.9.6d broke shared builds

2002-11-15 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Fri, 15 Nov 2002 07:55:26 +0100 (MET), Solar Designer via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: rt * Wed Sep 25 2002 Solar Designer [EMAIL PROTECTED] rt - Don't do an explicit make build-shared, it's not needed and could only rt cause harm (link libssl against libcrypto

Re: [openssl.org #29] -Wl,-Bsymbolic in 0.9.6d broke shared builds

2002-11-15 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker via RT
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Fri, 15 Nov 2002 07:55:26 +0100 (MET), Solar Designer via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: rt * Wed Sep 25 2002 Solar Designer [EMAIL PROTECTED] rt - Don't do an explicit make build-shared, it's not needed and could only rt cause harm (link libssl against libcrypto

Re: [openssl.org #29] -Wl,-Bsymbolic in 0.9.6d broke shared builds

2002-11-15 Thread Solar Designer
On Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 03:00:37PM +0100, Richard Levitte via RT wrote: [[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Sun May 12 22:48:56 2002]: JFYI, when updating our package from 0.9.6c to 0.9.6d I've noticed that the new shared libcrypto library doesn't work anymore. The openssl(1) binary wouldn't

Re: [openssl.org #29] -Wl,-Bsymbolic in 0.9.6d broke shared builds

2002-11-15 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Fri, 15 Nov 2002 09:54:31 +0300, Solar Designer [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: solar I've now tried removing the patch from our 0.9.6g package and what I solar get is: solar solar 1. Both versions appear to produce a working library now, however: solar solar 2. The

Re: [openssl.org #29] -Wl,-Bsymbolic in 0.9.6d broke shared builds

2002-11-15 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker via RT
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Fri, 15 Nov 2002 09:54:31 +0300, Solar Designer [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: solar I've now tried removing the patch from our 0.9.6g package and what I solar get is: solar solar 1. Both versions appear to produce a working library now, however: solar solar 2. The

Re: [openssl.org #29] -Wl,-Bsymbolic in 0.9.6d broke shared builds

2002-11-15 Thread Solar Designer via RT
On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 09:05:13AM +0100, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker via RT wrote: rt # DIRS= crypto ssl rsaref $(SHLIB_MARK) apps test tools rt # all: clean-shared Makefile.ssl sub_all rt make Makefile.ssl rt make sub_all DIRS=crypto ssl rsaref rt LD_LIBRARY_PATH=`pwd` make sub_all

Re: [openssl.org #29] -Wl,-Bsymbolic in 0.9.6d broke shared builds

2002-11-15 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker via RT
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Fri, 15 Nov 2002 10:26:26 +0100 (MET), Solar Designer via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: rt Well, I left it in because the original Makefile would build it too. rt Is that just to support Configure rsaref? Yes. -- Richard Levitte \ Spannvägen 38, II \ [EMAIL

Re: [openssl.org #29] -Wl,-Bsymbolic in 0.9.6d broke shared builds

2002-11-15 Thread Solar Designer
On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 09:05:13AM +0100, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker via RT wrote: rt # DIRS= crypto ssl rsaref $(SHLIB_MARK) apps test tools rt # all: clean-shared Makefile.ssl sub_all rt make Makefile.ssl rt make sub_all DIRS=crypto ssl rsaref rt LD_LIBRARY_PATH=`pwd` make sub_all

[openssl.org #29] -Wl,-Bsymbolic in 0.9.6d broke shared builds

2002-11-14 Thread Richard Levitte via RT
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Sun May 12 22:48:56 2002]: JFYI, when updating our package from 0.9.6c to 0.9.6d I've noticed that the new shared libcrypto library doesn't work anymore. The openssl(1) binary wouldn't recognize any of the block ciphers. I tracked this down to the addition of

Re: [openssl.org #29] -Wl,-Bsymbolic in 0.9.6d broke shared builds

2002-11-14 Thread Solar Designer via RT
On Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 03:00:37PM +0100, Richard Levitte via RT wrote: [[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Sun May 12 22:48:56 2002]: JFYI, when updating our package from 0.9.6c to 0.9.6d I've noticed that the new shared libcrypto library doesn't work anymore. The openssl(1) binary wouldn't

Re: [openssl.org #29] -Wl,-Bsymbolic in 0.9.6d broke shared builds

2002-05-13 Thread Ben Laurie
Lutz Jaenicke via RT wrote: [[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Sun May 12 22:48:56 2002]: JFYI, when updating our package from 0.9.6c to 0.9.6d I've noticed that the new shared libcrypto library doesn't work anymore. The openssl(1) binary wouldn't recognize any of the block ciphers. I tracked

[openssl.org #29] -Wl,-Bsymbolic in 0.9.6d broke shared builds

2002-05-12 Thread Solar Designer via RT
JFYI, when updating our package from 0.9.6c to 0.9.6d I've noticed that the new shared libcrypto library doesn't work anymore. The openssl(1) binary wouldn't recognize any of the block ciphers. I tracked this down to the addition of -Wl,-Bsymbolic. Removing that option solved the problem for

[openssl.org #29] -Wl,-Bsymbolic in 0.9.6d broke shared builds

2002-05-12 Thread Lutz Jaenicke via RT
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Sun May 12 22:48:56 2002]: JFYI, when updating our package from 0.9.6c to 0.9.6d I've noticed that the new shared libcrypto library doesn't work anymore. The openssl(1) binary wouldn't recognize any of the block ciphers. I tracked this down to the addition of