Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Placement API WSGI code -- let's just use flask

On 21/06/2016 13:04, Sean Dague wrote: > On 06/21/2016 07:39 AM, Jay Pipes wrote: >> On 06/21/2016 05:43 AM, Sylvain Bauza wrote: >>> Le 21/06/2016 10:04, Chris Dent a écrit : On Mon, 20 Jun 2016, Jay Pipes wrote: > Flask seems to be the most widely used and known WSGI framework so

Re: [openstack-dev] [tempest][nova][defcore] Add option to disable some strict response checking for interop testing

On 16/06/2016 00:30, Matthew Treinish wrote: > On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 09:10:30AM -0400, Doug Hellmann wrote: >> Excerpts from Chris Hoge's message of 2016-06-14 16:37:06 -0700: >>> Top posting one note and direct comments inline, I’m proposing >>> this as a member of the DefCore working group,

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][tc] Require a level playing field for OpenStack projects

On 14/06/2016 17:14, Anita Kuno wrote: > On 06/14/2016 10:44 AM, Hayes, Graham wrote: >> On 14/06/2016 15:00, Thierry Carrez wrote: >>> Hi everyone, >>> >>> I just proposed a new requirement for OpenStack "official" projects, >>> which I

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][tc] Require a level playing field for OpenStack projects

On 14/06/2016 15:00, Thierry Carrez wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I just proposed a new requirement for OpenStack "official" projects, > which I think is worth discussing beyond the governance review: > > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/329448/ > > From an upstream perspective, I see us as being in

Re: [openstack-dev] [API] os-api-ref HTTP Response code formating

On 19/05/2016 16:11, Sean Dague wrote: > On 05/19/2016 10:37 AM, Hayes, Graham wrote: >> On 18/05/2016 20:12, Sean Dague wrote: >>> On 05/18/2016 02:42 PM, Hayes, Graham wrote: >>>> I was moving Designate to the os-api-ref extension, and I spotted >>>>

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-docs] [API] os-api-ref HTTP Response code formating

On 19/05/2016 14:09, Anne Gentle wrote: > > > On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 1:42 PM, Hayes, Graham <graham.ha...@hpe.com > <mailto:graham.ha...@hpe.com>> wrote: > > I was moving Designate to the os-api-ref extension, and I spotted > something I thought we co

Re: [openstack-dev] [API] os-api-ref HTTP Response code formating

On 18/05/2016 20:12, Sean Dague wrote: > On 05/18/2016 02:42 PM, Hayes, Graham wrote: >> I was moving Designate to the os-api-ref extension, and I spotted >> something I thought we could do to improve the readability. >> >> Currently we have the HTTP Response Codes as a

[openstack-dev] [API] os-api-ref HTTP Response code formating

I was moving Designate to the os-api-ref extension, and I spotted something I thought we could do to improve the readability. Currently we have the HTTP Response Codes as a single line on the page - I thought a table might be handy as well. So, I had a go at it - and put up a POC[0] It outputs

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [designate] multi-tenancy in Neutron's DNS integration

eitzer <mspre...@us.ibm.com> > wrote: >> "Hayes, Graham" <graham.ha...@hpe.com> wrote on 05/10/2016 09:30:26 AM: >> >> > ... >> > > Ah, that may be what I want. BTW, I am not planning to use Nova. > I am >> > > planning to use S

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] supporting Go

On 10/05/2016 23:28, Gregory Haynes wrote: > On Tue, May 10, 2016, at 11:10 AM, Hayes, Graham wrote: >> On 10/05/2016 01:01, Gregory Haynes wrote: >>> >>> On Mon, May 9, 2016, at 03:54 PM, John Dickinson wrote: >>>> On 9 May 2016, at 13:16, Gregory

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] supporting Go

On 10/05/2016 20:48, Chris Friesen wrote: > On 05/10/2016 12:10 PM, Hayes, Graham wrote: > >> The way this component works makes it quite difficult to make any major >> improvement. >> >> MiniDNS (the component) takes data and sends a zone transfer every ti

Re: [openstack-dev] Team blogs

On 10/05/2016 20:20, Matt Riedemann wrote: > On 5/9/2016 6:46 PM, Sean Dague wrote: >> On 05/09/2016 06:37 PM, Joshua Harlow wrote: >>> After seeing the amount of summit recaps and the scattered nature of >>> these (some on the ML, some on etherpads, some on personal blogs); I am >>> starting to

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] supporting Go

On 10/05/2016 01:01, Gregory Haynes wrote: > > On Mon, May 9, 2016, at 03:54 PM, John Dickinson wrote: >> On 9 May 2016, at 13:16, Gregory Haynes wrote: >>> >>> This is a bit of an aside but I am sure others are wondering the same >>> thing - Is there some info (specs/etherpad/ML thread/etc) that

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [designate] multi-tenancy in Neutron's DNS integration

On 09/05/2016 21:48, Mike Spreitzer wrote: > "Hayes, Graham" <graham.ha...@hpe.com> wrote on 05/09/2016 04:08:07 PM: > > > ... > > On 09/05/2016 20:55, Mike Spreitzer wrote: > > ... > > > Oh, right, the network gets to specify the rest

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [designate] multi-tenancy in Neutron's DNS integration

On 9 May 2016 9:48 p.m., Mike Spreitzer <mspre...@us.ibm.com> wrote: > > "Hayes, Graham" <graham.ha...@hpe.com> wrote on "Hayes, Graham" <graham.ha...@hpe.com> wrote on 05/09/2016 04:08:07 PM: > ... > On 09/05/2016 20:55, Mike Spreitzer wrote

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [designate] multi-tenancy in Neutron's DNS integration

On 09/05/2016 20:55, Mike Spreitzer wrote: > "Hayes, Graham" <graham.ha...@hpe.com> wrote on 05/09/2016 03:00:34 PM: > > > From: "Hayes, Graham" <graham.ha...@hpe.com> > > To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)&quo

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] supporting Go

On 09/05/2016 20:46, Adam Young wrote: > On 05/09/2016 02:14 PM, Hayes, Graham wrote: >> On 09/05/2016 19:09, Fox, Kevin M wrote: >>> I think you'll find that being able to embed a higher performance language >>> inside python will be much easier to do for optimizing a

[openstack-dev] [designate] Summit Recap

I started writing this on a plane on the way home from Austin, TX where we just finished up the Newton design summit for OpenStack, and finished it a few days later - please excuse any weirdness in syntax or flow :) 6 Months On: Where are we = One of the things I did

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [designate] multi-tenancy in Neutron's DNS integration

On 09/05/2016 19:21, Mike Spreitzer wrote: > I just read > http://docs.openstack.org/mitaka/networking-guide/adv-config-dns.htmland, > unless > I missed something, it seems to be describing something that is not > multi-tenant. I am focused on FQDNs for Neutron Ports. For those, only > the

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] supporting Go

On 09/05/2016 19:39, Ben Swartzlander wrote: > On 05/09/2016 02:15 PM, Clint Byrum wrote: >> Excerpts from Pete Zaitcev's message of 2016-05-09 08:52:16 -0700: >>> On Mon, 9 May 2016 09:06:02 -0400 >>> Rayson Ho wrote: >>> Since the Go toolchain is pretty

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] supporting Go

a very targeted scope for our Go work. - Graham > ________ > From: Hayes, Graham [graham.ha...@hpe.com] > Sent: Monday, May 09, 2016 4:33 AM > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [tc]

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] supporting Go

On 08/05/2016 10:21, Thomas Goirand wrote: > On 05/04/2016 01:29 AM, Hayes, Graham wrote: >> On 03/05/2016 17:03, John Dickinson wrote: >>> TC, >>> >>> In reference to >>> http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2016-May/093680.html and >

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] supporting Go

On 04/05/2016 00:32, Hayes, Graham wrote: > On 03/05/2016 17:03, John Dickinson wrote: >> TC, >> >> In reference to >> http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2016-May/093680.html and >> Thierry's reply, I'm currently drafting a

[openstack-dev] [designate] Reminder - IRC meeting postponed this week

As discussed in the design summit - we are skipping the IRC meeting today. Talk to you all in a week / #openstack-dns - Graham __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe:

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] supporting Go

On 03/05/2016 17:03, John Dickinson wrote: > TC, > > In reference to > http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2016-May/093680.html and > Thierry's reply, I'm currently drafting a TC resolution to update >

Re: [openstack-dev] JavaScript RoadMap for OpenStack Newton

On 21/04/2016 15:39, Michael Krotscheck wrote: [...] > New: js-openstacklib > > This new project will be incubated as a single, gate-tested JavaScript > API client library for the OpenStack API’s. Its audience is software > engineers who wish to build their own user interface using modern >

Re: [openstack-dev] [release][requirements][packaging][summit] input needed on summit discussion about global requirements

On Mon, 18 Apr 2016, Sean Dague wrote: Many (most?) people won't be doing those kinds of installations. If all-in- one installations are important to the rpm- and deb- based distributions then _they_ should be resolving the dependency issues local to their own

Re: [openstack-dev] [release][requirements][packaging][summit] input needed on summit discussion about global requirements

On 18/04/2016 13:51, Sean Dague wrote: > On 04/18/2016 08:22 AM, Chris Dent wrote: >> On Mon, 18 Apr 2016, Sean Dague wrote: >> >>> So if you have strong feelings and ideas, why not get them out in email >>> now? That will help in the framing of the conversation. >> >> I won't be at summit and I

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla][tc] [security] threat analysis, tags, and the road ahead

On 12/04/2016 18:39, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > On 2016-04-01 15:50:57 + (+), Hayes, Graham wrote: >> If a team has already done a TA (e.g. as part of an internal >> product TA) (and produced all the documentation) would this meet >> the requirements? >> >&g

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Minimal secure identification of a new VM

m: Daniel P. Berrange [berra...@redhat.com] > Sent: Wednesday, April 06, 2016 9:04 AM > To: Hayes, Graham > Cc: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Minimal secure identification of a new VM > > On Wed, Apr 06, 2016 a

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] FreeIPA integration

On 06/04/2016 17:17, Rich Megginson wrote: > On 04/06/2016 02:55 AM, Hayes, Graham wrote: >> On 06/04/16 03:09, Adam Young wrote: >>> On 04/05/2016 08:02 AM, Hayes, Graham wrote: >>>> On 02/04/2016 22:33, Adam Young wrote: >>>>> I finally have enough u

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Minimal secure identification of a new VM

On 06/04/2016 17:04, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > On Wed, Apr 06, 2016 at 04:03:18PM +0000, Hayes, Graham wrote: >> On 06/04/2016 16:54, Gary Kotton wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 4/6/16, 12:42 PM, "Daniel P. Berrange" <berra...@redhat.com> wrote: >

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Minimal secure identification of a new VM

On 06/04/2016 16:54, Gary Kotton wrote: > > > On 4/6/16, 12:42 PM, "Daniel P. Berrange" wrote: > >> On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 06:00:55PM -0400, Adam Young wrote: >>> We have a use case where we want to register a newly spawned Virtual >>> machine >>> with an identity provider.

Re: [openstack-dev] [designate][osc] new sub commands - how should they be named?

On 06/04/2016 15:20, Qiming Teng wrote: > On Wed, Apr 06, 2016 at 01:59:29PM +0000, Hayes, Graham wrote: >> Designate is adding support for viewing the status of the various >> services that are running. >> >> We have added support to our openstack client plugin, but w

[openstack-dev] [designate][osc] new sub commands - how should they be named?

Designate is adding support for viewing the status of the various services that are running. We have added support to our openstack client plugin, but were looking for guidance / advices on what the actual commands should be. We have implemented it in [1] as "dns service list" and "dns service

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] FreeIPA integration

On 02/04/2016 22:33, Adam Young wrote: > I finally have enough understanding of what is going on with Tripleo to > reasonably discuss how to implement solutions for some of the main > security needs of a deployment. > > > FreeIPA is an identity management solution that can provide support for: > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] -2'ing all patches on every gate breakage

On 04/04/2016 23:20, Carl Baldwin wrote: > On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 3:22 PM, Doug Wiegley > wrote: >> I don’t know, -1 really means, “there is something wrong, the submitter >> should fix it and clear the slate.” Whereas -2 has two meanings. The first >> is

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] -2'ing all patches on every gate breakage

On 04/04/2016 17:11, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: > Hi all, > > I noticed that often times we go and -2 all the patches in the review queue > on every neutron specific gate breakage spotted. This is allegedly done to > make sure that nothing known to be broken land in merge gate until we fix > the

Re: [openstack-dev] [Designate] Tempest Tests - in-repo or separate

On 04/04/2016 16:36, Jordan Pittier wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 5:01 PM, Hayes, Graham <graham.ha...@hpe.com > <mailto:graham.ha...@hpe.com>> wrote: > > As we have started to move to a tempest plugin for our functional test > suite, we have 2 choices a

[openstack-dev] [Designate] Tempest Tests - in-repo or separate

As we have started to move to a tempest plugin for our functional test suite, we have 2 choices about where it lives. 1 - In repo (as we have [0] currently) 2 - In a repo of its own (something like openstack/designate-tempest) There are several advantages to a separate repo: * It will force us

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla][tc] [security] threat analysis, tags, and the road ahead

>> On 3/31/16, 12:15 PM, "michael mccune" wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> one of the big questions seems to be who should be doing these analysis, >>> especially given that the ossp has not formally codified the practice >>> yet, and the complexity involved. although currently the >>>

Re: [openstack-dev] [docs] Our Install Guides Only Cover Defcore - What about big tent?

On 23/03/2016 16:12, Steve Gordon wrote: > - Original Message - >> From: "Steve Gordon" >> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" >> >> >> - Original Message - >>> From: "Graham Hayes"

Re: [openstack-dev] [docs] Our Install Guides Only Cover Defcore - What about big tent?

On 23/03/2016 15:37, Steve Gordon wrote: > - Original Message - >> From: "Mike Perez" >> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List" >> >> Hey all, >> >> I've been talking to a variety of projects about lack of install guides. This >>

Re: [openstack-dev] [i18n][horizon][sahara][trove][magnum][murano] dashboard plugin release schedule

On 19/03/2016 17:47, Akihiro Motoki wrote: > Hi dashboard plugins team > (sahara-dashboard, trove-dashboard, magnum-ui, murano-dashboard) > There is also a designate-dashboard plugin - we have translation set up for Mitaka. We have string frozen as of RC1 - so if there is translations before RC2

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] Question about electorate for project without gerrit contribution

On 16/03/2016 04:47, Tony Breeds wrote: > On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 09:41:41PM +0000, Hayes, Graham wrote: >> I do not see the time frame for defining an electorate there. >> >> PTL seats are completely renewed every 6 months. A separate election is >> run for >> e

Re: [openstack-dev] [cross-project] [all] Quotas -- service vs. library

On 16/03/2016 06:28, Nikhil Komawar wrote: > Hello everyone, > > tl;dr; > I'm writing to request some feedback on whether the cross project Quotas > work should move ahead as a service or a library or going to a far > extent I'd ask should this even be in a common repository, would > projects

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][infra][ptls] tagging reviews, making tags searchable

On 18/03/2016 14:19, Amrith Kumar wrote: > As we were working through reviews for the Mitaka release, the Trove > team was trying to track groups of reviews that were needed for a > specific milestone, like m-1, or m-3 or in the recent days for rc1. > > The only way we could find was to have

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] Question about electorate for project without gerrit contribution

On 15/03/2016 21:09, Tony Breeds wrote: > On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 08:35:23PM +0000, Hayes, Graham wrote: > >> Does the current PTL not have the ability to propose extra-atc's for >> this reason? >> >> Would a solution be for zigo to propose the people active in >

[openstack-dev] [designate] PTL Candidacy

Hi All! I am proposing myself for PTL of the Designate project. In the last 6 months we have had a smaller amount of changes into the project, but this has not necessarily been a bad thing for us. We have stabilized some of the changes that have been filtering through over the last year or so,

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] Question about electorate for project without gerrit contribution

On 15/03/2016 20:29, Thomas Goirand wrote: > On 03/15/2016 08:22 PM, Tony Breeds wrote: >> However, at the risk of sounding like a humorless automaton, we have a valid >> candidate. >> * Monty Taylor for Packaging-Deb PTL >> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/292690/ > > This started as a joke.

Re: [openstack-dev] [release][all][ptl] preparing to create stable/mitaka branches for libraries

On 09/03/2016 17:29, Doug Hellmann wrote: > It's time to start opening the stable branches for libraries. I've > prepared a list of repositories and the proposed versions from which > we will create stable/mitaka branches, and need each team to sign off on > the versions. If you know you intend to

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-docs] Fwd: [Neutron][LBaaS][Octavia][Docs] Need experienced contributor documentation best-practices and how-tos

On 07/03/2016 16:00, Matt Kassawara wrote: > Snipping a lot, because I'm particularly interested in one comment... > > > I agree that many developers (especially developers of those groups > new to the big tent) seem to think that they need to be on the top > level docs.openstack.org

[openstack-dev] [kosmos] IRC Meeting this week

Hi, As I am at the Designate mid cycle this week I will not make the IRC meeting this week. Can dougwig / johnsom take over, or will we skip this week? Thanks, Graham __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage

[openstack-dev] [designate] IRC Meeting Canceled this week

As most of us are in Galway at the mid cycle this week, we are going to cancel the meeting this week. Talk to you all tomorrow / next week. Thanks Graham __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)

Re: [Openstack] Designate Install SQL errors (Liberty)

Can you post the sqlalchemy section of your config? (with passwords removed) and could you also run "sudo netstat -nlp | grep 3306" ? On 06/02/16 03:41, Steve Searles wrote: I have tried it both ways. Sent from my iPhone On Feb 5, 2016, at 8:28 PM, Mohammed Naser

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] the trouble with names

On 04/02/2016 11:40, Sean Dague wrote: > A few issues have crept up recently with the service catalog, API > headers, API end points, and even similarly named resources in > different resources (e.g. backup), that are all circling around a key > problem. Distributed teams and naming collision. > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] the trouble with names

On 04/02/2016 13:24, Doug Hellmann wrote: > Excerpts from Hayes, Graham's message of 2016-02-04 12:54:56 +: >> On 04/02/2016 11:40, Sean Dague wrote: >>> A few issues have crept up recently with the service catalog, API >>> headers, API end points, and even similarly named resources in >>>

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] the trouble with names

On 04/02/2016 15:40, Ryan Brown wrote: > On 02/04/2016 09:32 AM, michael mccune wrote: >> On 02/04/2016 08:33 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: >>> Hayes, Graham wrote: >>>> On 04/02/2016 13:24, Doug Hellmann wrote: >>>>> Excerpts from Hayes, Graham's message

[openstack-dev] [oslo][oslo.versionedobjects] Is it possible to make changes to oslo repos?

Recently I tried started to use oslo.versionedobjects for a project. After playing around with it for a while, I noticed I could set "this is not a uuid" as the value of a UUIDField. After making sure I made no mistakes - I looked at the underlying code, and found:[0] class UUID(FieldType):

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][oslo.versionedobjects] Is it possible to make changes to oslo repos?

enstack-stats/neutron-reviewers-365.txt > > On the one single specific review you had a -2, you should be talking > to the reviewer on IRC or bring it to the next Oslo meeting. Did that. And on the review itself. > Thanks, > Dims > > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 12:29 PM, Joshua H

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][oslo.versionedobjects] Is it possible to make changes to oslo repos?

On 28/01/2016 19:13, Mike Bayer wrote: > > > On 01/28/2016 01:52 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: >> Excerpts from Hayes, Graham's message of 2016-01-28 17:01:09 +: >>> >>> The steps I had looked at doing was this: >>> >>> 1. Allow a "validate" flag on the Field __init__() defaulting to False. >>>

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][oslo.versionedobjects] Is it possible to make changes to oslo repos?

On 28/01/2016 18:54, Doug Hellmann wrote: > Excerpts from Hayes, Graham's message of 2016-01-28 17:01:09 +: >> Recently I tried started to use oslo.versionedobjects for a project. >> >> After playing around with it for a while, I noticed I could set "this is >> not a uuid" as the value of a

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][oslo.versionedobjects] Is it possible to make changes to oslo repos?

On 28/01/2016 20:16, Doug Hellmann wrote: > Excerpts from Hayes, Graham's message of 2016-01-28 19:17:54 +: >> On 28/01/2016 18:54, Doug Hellmann wrote: >>> Excerpts from Hayes, Graham's message of 2016-01-28 17:01:09 +: Recently I tried started to use oslo.versionedobjects for a

[openstack-dev] [Designate] Old Reviews

Hi All, We have built up a lot of old reviews, that can be removed. So, this day next week I proposed I abandon any reviews that have not been updated in 42 days. If people want to Unabandon any changes, please do - this is not about In our repos the following list would be abandoned if there

[openstack-dev] [api] - WSGI 2.0 Call for Interest

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I saw this [0] float by in an IRC room this morning - is this something the API WG / OpenStack should be thinking of participating in? 0 - https://mail.python.org/pipermail/web-sig/2016-January/005357.html - - Graham - -- Graham Hayes -BEGIN

[openstack-dev] [Kosmos] Mid Cycle - Jan 20th-22nd

Hi all, The Kosmos mid cycle has been set for the HPE Offices, in Seattle WA [0] from the 20th to the 22nd of January. If you are interested in attending please fill out [1] so I can make sure the rooms are big enough. We are tracking ideas for the 3 days here [0] - please put any ideas you

[openstack-dev] [Designate] Mid Cycle - 08-10 Feb

Hi all, The Designate mid cycle has been set for the HPE Offices, in Galway, Ireland [0] from the 08th to the 10th of February. If you are interested in attending please fill out [1] so I can make sure the rooms are big enough. We are tracking ideas for the 3 days here [0] - please put any

Re: [openstack-dev] [designate][chef] cookbook-openstack-dnsaas

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 20/11/15 21:23, JJ Asghar wrote: > Hey everyone! > > Per our goals for the M cycle, I've started > cookbook-openstack-dnsaas[1]. It's under my namespace for the time > being; but shouldn't be much longer. > > I walked through the developer

Re: [openstack-dev] Regarding Designate Issues

On 10/11/15 11:02, Sharma Swati6 wrote: > Hi All, > > I am trying to install Designate using Devstack-Kilo but facing the > following issues while starting its services- > > 1. WARNING keystone.common.wsgi [-] Could not find service: dns > 2. WARNING keystone.common.wsgi [-] Could not find

Re: [openstack-dev] [designate] Code Freeze - Happening tomorrow

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Last reminder! See http://graham.hayes.ie/posts/the-big-rename/ for more details On 19/10/15 19:26, Hayes, Graham wrote: > Hi All, > > Just a reminder that at the last IRC meeting [0] we decided a few > things > > 1 - We ar

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Outcome of distributed lock manager discussion @ the summit

On 04/11/15 20:04, Ed Leafe wrote: > On Nov 3, 2015, at 6:45 AM, Davanum Srinivas wrote: >> >> Here's a Devstack review for zookeeper in support of this initiative: >> >> https://review.openstack.org/241040 >> >> Thanks, >> Dims > > I thought that the operators at that session

[openstack-dev] [Designate] Mitaka Summit Notes

Here are my rough notes I wrote up about the Mitaka design summit, and what designate covered during the week. Design Summit = This was a much more relaxed summit for Designate. We had done a huge amount of work in Vancouver, and we were nailing down details and doing cross project

[openstack-dev] [Kosmos] Meeting tomorrow

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi All, I will not be able to attend the meeting tomorrow, so unless Doug or Michael can chair, I would suggest postponing the meeting for a week. Thanks, Graham - -- *Graham Hayes

[openstack-dev] [Kosmos] Summit In Person Meetup

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi All, If anyone is available, I would like for anyone interested in Kosmos to meet in person! I would suggest that tomorrow (Thursday) Afternoon, after lunch in the Dev Lounge. Can people let me know i this is do able? Thanks, Graham My number

[openstack-dev] [designate] Update on Meetings + Code Freeze post Summit

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi All, Just a reminder that at the last IRC meeting [0] we decided a few things 1 - We are skipping 2 weeks or IRC meetings 2 - Due to the "big rename" [1] we are implementing a code freeze from the 10th -> 13th of November. The core team

[openstack-dev] [Kosmos] Skipping IRC Meeting for the next 2 weeks

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 In light of all the travelling that will be happening, we have decided to skip the weekly IRC meeting for the next 2 weeks. Thanks, Graham - -- Graham Hayes -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)

Re: [openstack-dev] [Zaqar][cli][openstackclient] conflict in nova flavor and zaqar flavor

On 13/10/15 16:46, Fox, Kevin M wrote: > lb's use the term pools too. A little more specific might be good. > > Thanks, > Kevin > > *From:* Victoria Martínez de la Cruz [victo...@vmartinezdelacruz.com] > *Sent:* Tuesday,

Re: [openstack-dev] conflicting names in python-openstackclient: could we have some exception handling please?

On 07/10/15 14:42, Ryan Brown wrote: > On 10/06/2015 05:15 PM, Thomas Goirand wrote: >> Hi, >> >> tl;dr: let's add a exception handling so that python-*client having >> conflicting command names isn't a problem anymore, and "openstack help" >> always work as much as it can. > > Standardizing on

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [ptls] Proposed Design Summit track/room/time allocation

On 02/10/15 09:08, Thierry Carrez wrote: > Hayes, Graham wrote: >> In previous years we have had "related open source project" sessions at >> the design summit, is that happening this year, or is space at too much >> of a premium? > > With the set up of the

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [ptls] Proposed Design Summit track/room/time allocation

On 01/10/15 17:17, Thierry Carrez wrote: > Hi PTLs, > > A few weeks ago I posted here the allocation of slots for each track at > the Design Summit: > > http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2015-September/073654.html > > You replied with a set of constraints, which makes it a fun

[openstack-dev] [Designate] Topics for Design Summit

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi All, Just a reminder that this etherpad is still nearly empty :). https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/designate-design-summit-tokyo Can we try and get a few more topics so we can talk about it on Wednesday? Thanks, Graham - -- Graham Hayes

Re: [openstack-dev] GSLB

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 08/09/15 12:55, Anik wrote: > Hello, > > Recently saw some discussions in the Designate mailer archive > around GSLB and saw some API snippets subsequently. Seems like > early stages on this project, but highly excited that there is some >

Re: [openstack-dev] GSLB

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 08/09/15 18:07, Anik wrote: > Hi Graham, > > Thanks for getting back. > > So am I correct in summarizing that the current plan is that [1] > GSLB will have its own API set and not evolve as an extension of > Designate and [2] GSLB will mostly act

Re: [openstack-dev] [designate] and [lbaas] - GSLB API and backend support

GSLB pull request merged to the repo https://github.com/gslb/gslb-specs/pull/1/files ? I would like to send another pull request based on these changes. Regards Kunal On Jun 30, 2015, at 8:38 AM, Hayes, Graham graham.ha...@hp.com mailto:graham.ha...@hp.com wrote: I have started to put

[openstack-dev] [GSLB][GLB] Meeting today @ 16:00 UTC

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, Reminder that we have a meeting today at 16:00 UTC in #openstack-meeting-4 The Agenda is as follows: API Spec: * https://github.com/gslb/gslb-specs/pull/1 * Can cores review + merge? Polaris Abstract: *

Re: [Openstack] [designate] Associate dynamically project name as domain

Hi Jaime, What you want to do should be possible, but will require some custom code to investigate. See inline for a few suggestions. On 27/07/15 16:32, Jaime Fernández wrote: I would like to register DNS records with the following format: name.interface.projectName.baseDomain to avoid

Re: [openstack-dev] [GSLB][LBaaS] Launchpad project, git repos and more!

Stackforge is being deprecated. On 22/07/15 02:18, Fox, Kevin M wrote: Why not stackforge? Thanks, Kevin * * *From:* Hayes, Graham *Sent:* Tuesday, July 21, 2015 11:53:35 AM *To:* OpenStack Development Mailing

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-tc][deb-packaging] Updated proposal for OpenStack deb packages

Hi, I replied previously, but it looks like I messed up the formatting :). Designate is missing from this list - we are currently packaged by both Ubuntu and Debian. We have 2 repos that would need packaging - openstack/designate openstack/designate-dashboard Thanks, Graham On 22/07/15

Re: [openstack-dev] [GSLB][LBaaS] Launchpad project, git repos and more!

Yup - we are waiting for the experimental projects spec to merge in openstack governance - we have a patch ready and waiting[1]. This is just to allow us to get moving. - 1 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/201683/ On 21/07/15 20:56, Clint Byrum wrote: Perhaps I missed a discussion: You seem to

[openstack-dev] [GSLB][LBaaS] Launchpad project, git repos and more!

Hi All, I have created a github org and 2 repos for us to get started in. https://github.com/gslb/ is the org, with https://github.com/gslb/gslb as the main code repo. There is 2 teams (Github's name for groups) gslb-core, and gslb-admin. Core have read/write access to the repos, and admin can

Re: [openstack-dev] [GSLB][LBaaS] Launchpad project, git repos and more!

I forgot to add there is also an IRC channel created - #openstack-gslb I also have one item for the agenda that we should think about over the week - do we want to have a project name? If we do we should add it soon, so we can name projects/repo etc correctly. - Graham On 21/07/15 20:02, Hayes

Re: [openstack-dev] [stackforge][deb][packges] Upstream repositories for OpenStack deb “server” packages

On 07/13/2015 08:44 PM, Igor Yozhikov wrote: Hello everyone. During the Liberty summit in Vancouver, the idea to maintain OpenStack packages for Debian and Ubuntu on upstream infra sparked. As part of the Openstack and Debian community we still want to push for it. Instead of trying to

Re: [openstack-dev] [designate][lbaas][GSLB] IRC Meeting Tomorrow - 07/Jul/2015 @ 16:00 UTC

A quick reminder that we will be reconvening tomorrow at 16:00UTC in #openstack-meeting-4 to continue the API discussion. Thanks, Graham On 06/07/15 15:27, Hayes, Graham wrote: Hi All, I have put up an agenda for the meeting tomorrow: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/GSLB

[openstack-dev] [designate][lbaas][GSLB] IRC Meeting Tomorrow - 07/Jul/2015 @ 16:00 UTC

Hi All, I have put up an agenda for the meeting tomorrow: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/GSLB It will be in #openstack-meeting-4 @ 16:00 UTC I sent around a strawman API doc last week - https://docs.google.com/document/d/1nw5jVn0hjmhlhkZJAohx-gqRkkbVhMMJ79Pogd0ysEk/edit?usp=sharing

Re: [openstack-dev] [designate] and [lbaas] - GSLB API and backend support

To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [designate] and [lbaas] - GSLB API and backend support On May 28, 2015, at 12:47 PM, Hayes, Graham graham.ha...@hp.com mailto:graham.ha...@hp.com wrote: On 28/05/15 19:38

Re: [openstack-dev] [designate] and [lbaas] - GSLB API and backend support

questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [designate] and [lbaas] - GSLB API and backend support On May 28, 2015, at 12:47 PM, Hayes, Graham graham.ha...@hp.com wrote: On 28/05/15 19:38, Adam Harwell wrote: I haven't seen any responses from my team yet, but I know we'd be interested as well

Re: [openstack-dev] GSLB API and backend support IRC meting

On 02/06/15 16:33, Evgeny Fedoruk wrote: Hi All, Does anyone know on which IRC channel the GSLB API meeting is happening? Thanks, Evg It was held in #openstack-meeting-4 The logs are here: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/gslb/2015/ We are meeting next week, same time, same

Re: [openstack-dev] [designate] and [lbaas] - GSLB API and backend support

On 28/05/15 19:38, Adam Harwell wrote: I haven’t seen any responses from my team yet, but I know we’d be interested as well — we have done quite a bit of work on this in the past, including dealing with the Designate team on this very subject. We can be available most hours between 9am-6pm

Re: [openstack-dev] [designate] and [lbaas] - GSLB API and backend support

That works for me. Is that OK for everyone else? - Sent from my phone On 28 May 2015 8:39 pm, Doug Wiegley doug...@parksidesoftware.com wrote: On May 28, 2015, at 12:47 PM, Hayes, Graham graham.ha...@hp.com wrote: On 28/05/15 19:38, Adam Harwell wrote: I haven’t seen any responses from my

Re: [openstack-dev] [Zaqar][all] Zaqar will stay... Lots of work ahead

On 05/26/2015 09:29 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote: Greetings, TL;DR: Thanks everyone for your feedback. Based on the discussed plans at the summit - I'll be writing more about these later - Zaqar will stick around and play its role in the community. Summit Summary == I'm happy

<    1   2   3   >