Re: [Openstack] Request for documentation about Ocata on Ubuntu with Networking OVN

There are more errors on Compute node as well, nova.log: http://paste.openstack.org/show/605439/ On 4 April 2017 at 15:14, Martinx - ジェームズ wrote: > Hello! > > Currently, I'm trying to deploy Ocata with Networking OVN, so far, no > success. > > I can easily deploy

[Openstack] Request for documentation about Ocata on Ubuntu with Networking OVN

Hello! Currently, I'm trying to deploy Ocata with Networking OVN, so far, no success. I can easily deploy Ocata in a multi-node environment (1 Controller, 1 Network and 2 Computes), using regular "neutron-openvswitch-agent" and its "ovs-firewall-driver". However, when I try the following

Re: [Openstack] Request for documentation about Ocata on Ubuntu with Networking OVN

I'm also seeing the following errors on ovs-vswitchd.log: http://paste.openstack.org/show/605441/ On 4 April 2017 at 15:19, Martinx - ジェームズ wrote: > There are more errors on Compute node as well, nova.log: > > http://paste.openstack.org/show/605439/ > > On 4 April

Re: [Openstack] Fuel 11 deployment fails

Hm, that's weird...There's no 192.168.0.4 host in the network, after I added it on the router and added msqr from network 192.168.0.0/24 - all network checks passed, but ctrl failed on All nodes are finished. Failed tasks: Task[conntrackd/11] Stopping the deployment process! On Tue, Apr 4, 2017

Re: [Openstack] Fuel 11 deployment fails

You have applied an incorrect solution to the problem which is caused by something else, and you've hit other problems further on - I'd expect something like this. On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 5:06 PM, Konstantin Raskoshnyi wrote: > Hm, that's weird...There's no 192.168.0.4 host

Re: [Openstack] Fuel 11 deployment fails

Hi Konstantin, - Anyone knows why fuel slaves during deployment get 192.168.0.4 as def gw? AFAIK this is by design - by default after deployment all nodes which have public IP will use public GW to access internet; all nodes without a public IP (which is the case when "Assign public network to

[Openstack] Launch instance on dashboard says not enough RAM

So under the dashboard if I try to launch an instance, when I get to the point of picking a flavor, under the memory/RAM column an orange warning triangle is shown, which I suppose indicates that there is not enough RAM available on the physical host. openstack host show shows

Re: [Openstack] Fuel 11 deployment fails

Konstantin, No, you should not need to do this, I believe something else is wrong with your configuration. There potentially may be a bug in Fuel 11 though, I have not tried this release, all my knowledge comes from Fuel 9 and below. I'd recommend trying 9.0 release to see if the same problem

Re: [Openstack] Slow internet speed - Instances with floating IP

Hello John, Can you update (increase) the MTU parameter set under "neutron net-show {your-net-name}" Thanks Mohit. On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 4:01 PM, John Petrini wrote: > Adding the OpenStack list in hopes this might get some attention there. > > Thanks All, > > ___ >

[Openstack] Not getting private network field in networks tab

Hello Everyone, While deploying OpenStack environment we are getting error for network verification. We are getting error verification failed. And expected VLAN not received on ens192. Also we observed we are not getting private network field as we have seen in many blogs and videos. We are

Re: [Openstack] Slow internet speed - Instances with floating IP

Hi Mohit, The tenant networks use an MTU of 8950. The floating network uses and MTU of 9000. neutron net-show 4305e3d5-b083-4f33-a2a0-1dfccf1238b6 +---+--+ | Field | Value|

[Openstack] [aodh] alarm-action posts don't seem to have any payload

Hello We recently transitioned from ‘legacy’ Ceilometer to Ceilometer+AODH+Gnocchi in our Mitaka cloud. One thing I noticed is that the alarm-action HTTP POSTs don’t seem to contain data about the alarm. In our old config, we used to receive information like this from the POST from

Re: [Openstack] Not getting private network field in networks tab

Hi, Because you're using VLAN segmentation in this case you'll have 5 networks ADMIN Pxe Public* Storage* Tenants* Management* For network with * you can use vlans On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 5:30 AM pratik dave wrote: > Hello Everyone, > > While deploying OpenStack

Re: [Openstack] Not getting private network field in networks tab

Thanks for replying. I do not see any Tenant or Private network on network tab. As you can see in the screenshot attached. On Apr 4, 2017 8:33 PM, "Konstantin Raskoshnyi" wrote: > Hi, > Because you're using VLAN segmentation in this case you'll have 5 networks > > ADMIN

[Openstack] Deployment fails

Hi guys, I added 4 modes (2 controllers, nova & cinder) When I deploy them master node fails with this error All nodes are finished. Failed tasks: Task[build_deploy_image/master] Stopping the deployment process Master node has internet access, I can ping ubuntu servers + all slave nodes has

Re: [Openstack] Slow internet speed - Instances with floating IP

Adding the OpenStack list in hopes this might get some attention there. Thanks All, ___ John Petrini ___ Mailing list: http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack Post to : openstack@lists.openstack.org Unsubscribe :

[Openstack] Fuel Reset Environment Never works

Hi, Does anyone know why Fuel's Reset Environment feature never works? The deployment after a reset always fails. I'm forced to delete the environment and start all over again and only then does the deployment finish successfully. It'll save me much time if somehow I can figure out how to get

[Openstack-operators] [telecom-nfv] Meeting #23 tomorrow!

Hi All, We will have our biweekly meeting tomorrow. [1] Feel free to add to the agenda. The openstack summit will be upon us soon. Hope to see you then. :) Thanks, Curtis. [1]: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/#OpenStack_Operators_Telco_and_NFV_Working_Group

Re: [openstack-dev] [kubernetes][go] External OpenStack Cloud Provider for Kubernetes

> On Apr 2, 2017, at 4:16 PM, Monty Taylor wrote: > > On 04/02/2017 02:53 PM, Chris Hoge wrote: >> Now that the provider has a repository in the OpenStack project >> namespace, we need to move over the existing set of issues and pull >> requests and create an initial work

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Roadmap for Container CI work

On Tue, 2017-04-04 at 16:01 -0400, Emilien Macchi wrote: > After our weekly meeting of today, I found useful to share and > discuss > our roadmap for Container CI jobs in TripleO. > They are ordered by priority from the highest to lowest: > > 1. Swap ovb-nonha job with ovb-containers, enable

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] New caching reverse proxies

On Tue, Apr 04, 2017 at 11:12:38AM -0700, Clark Boylan wrote: > Hello, > > Just a heads up that we are experimenting with new caching reverse > proxies on our cloud region local mirror nodes. The idea here being that > not every hosted resource is easily mirrorable but we can pretty easily >

Re: [Openstack-operators] [Openstack] Slow internet speed - Instances with floating IP

Hi All, Turns out this was a DNS issue. The speedtest-cli script does a lot of lookups and these lookups were hanging due to parallel A and requests resulting in the unexpected results. I added the following to /etc/resolv.conf and the issue seems to be resolved. options

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo][kolla] extended start and hostpath persistent dirs (was: kolla_bootstrap for non-openstack services)

On Tue, 2017-04-04 at 18:03 +0200, Bogdan Dobrelya wrote: > On 03.04.2017 21:01, Dan Prince wrote: > > On Mon, 2017-04-03 at 16:15 +0200, Bogdan Dobrelya wrote: > > > Let's please re-evaluate configuration of containerized non- > > > openstack, > > > like database, message queue, key value, web,

Re: [openstack-dev] [kubernetes][go] External OpenStack Cloud Provider for Kubernetes

> On Apr 2, 2017, at 4:29 PM, Monty Taylor wrote: > > On 03/29/2017 03:39 PM, Steve Gordon wrote: >> - Original Message - >>> From: "Davanum Srinivas" >>> To: "Chris Hoge" >>> Cc: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not

[openstack-dev] [storlets] Storlet meetings today and in the next two weeks

Hi All, As these are holidays in Israel i will not be able to make it today and in the next two weeks. Feel free to hold the meetings without me. Just coordinate via the mailing list so that others can join. If there is anything you would like to discuss. please ping on IRC in

[openstack-dev] [puppet] stepping down from puppet-openstack core

I am stepping down as core in the puppet openstack project. This is the culmination of a long and slow refocus of my work efforts into other areas. Additionally I'm not sure what the future holds for me at this point, and although it's possible that I will be doing puppet again but it's not fair

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] Stop enabling EPEL mirror by default

On 04/05/2017 03:02 AM, Paul Belanger wrote: > Recently we've been running into some issues keeping our EPEL mirror > properly sync'd. We are working to fix this, however we'd also like > to do the following: > Stop enabling EPEL mirror by default > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/453222/ >

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Switching gate testing to use Ubuntu Cloud Archive

On 04/04/2017 12:14 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: On Tue, Apr 04, 2017 at 09:21:27AM -0700, Clark Boylan wrote: On Tue, Apr 4, 2017, at 06:36 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: On Mon, Apr 03, 2017 at 04:06:53PM -0700, Clark Boylan wrote: I have pushed a change to devstack [3] to enable using UCA

[openstack-dev] [tripleo] Roadmap for Container CI work

After our weekly meeting of today, I found useful to share and discuss our roadmap for Container CI jobs in TripleO. They are ordered by priority from the highest to lowest: 1. Swap ovb-nonha job with ovb-containers, enable introspection on the container job and shuffle other coverage (e.g ssl)

Re: [openstack-dev] [barbican] How to update cert in the secret

Hi Andrey, As we discussed on IRC, the listeners in LBaaS v2 allow you to update the barbican container IDs. This will start the certificate update process on the load balancers with the new content from barbican. The neutron client, as you noted, does not appear to have this

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][networking-l2gw] openstack vtep setup missing docs

On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 8:53 AM, Saverio Proto wrote: > Hello Armando, > > I managed to implement the L2GW setup purely in software, without an > hardware appliance. Nice! That is very interesting. I will take a look at the work you've done here. Thanks, Curtis. > > I

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][networking-l2gw] openstack vtep setup missing docs

On 4 April 2017 at 07:53, Saverio Proto wrote: > Hello Armando, > > I managed to implement the L2GW setup purely in software, without an > hardware appliance. > > I documented in the README file, please look at this review > https://review.openstack.org/453209 Nice

Re: [Openstack-operators] [Openstack] Slow internet speed - Instances with floating IP

I recommend filing an issue against that speedtest-cli script. I noticed the timer seems to be started before the DNS lookup occurs (before call to urlopen). This means any DNS issues impact the measurement of what is supposed to be network throughput. On Apr 4, 2017 13:19, "John Petrini"

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] version document for project navigator

Hooray! Thanks Monty :) Monty Taylor April 4, 2017 at 5:47 PM Hey all, As per our discussion in today's TC meeting, I have made a document format for reporting versions to the project navigator. I stuck it in the releases repo:

[openstack-dev] [tc] version document for project navigator

Hey all, As per our discussion in today's TC meeting, I have made a document format for reporting versions to the project navigator. I stuck it in the releases repo: https://review.openstack.org/453361 Because there was already per-release information there, and the governance repo did

Re: [openstack-dev] [barbican] How to update cert in the secret

Hi Michael, Thanks for that, it is right that it is supposed to be Neutron's responsibility. Moreover, I just found out that I can actually use Neutron CLI for the update too - I just have to specify "--default-tls-container_ref" option with the new container (it looks kind of weird but it didn't

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][TripleO][release][deployment] Packaging problems due to branch/release ordering

adding [all] for more visibility... See comments inline: On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 2:02 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote: > On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 12:29 PM, Alan Pevec wrote: >> 2017-03-09 14:58 GMT+01:00 Jeremy Stanley : >>> In the past we

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Spec review sprint on Tuesday April 4th

On 3/23/2017 10:55 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote: As discussed in the nova meeting today [1] we will be having a spec review sprint on Tuesday April 4th. We have ~111 open specs for review and the spec freeze is on April 13th [2] so this will give us a push for reviews before the deadline. We'll be

Re: [openstack-dev] [puppet] stepping down from puppet-openstack core

On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 3:23 PM, Matt Fischer wrote: > I am stepping down as core in the puppet openstack project. This is the > culmination of a long and slow refocus of my work efforts into other areas. > Additionally I'm not sure what the future holds for me at this point,

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Removing BDM devices from POST requests

On 4/2/2017 10:10 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: On 4/2/2017 8:08 PM, Feodor Tersin wrote: Can you give some more details? How does this actually "merge" or replace BDMs defined in the image metadata? Is this because we use device name as part of a hack for a primary key in the database [1]? I

[openstack-dev] [election][tc] TC candidacy

Hi Everyone, I'd like to submit my candidacy for another term on the OpenStack Technical Committee. In my candidacy platform last year I outlined that if elected to the TC I wanted to bring more technical oversight to the TC, and also to work on improving the messaging around OpenStack, to make

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][TripleO][release][deployment] Packaging problems due to branch/release ordering

On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 9:36 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote: > adding [all] for more visibility... See comments inline: > > On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 2:02 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote: >> On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 12:29 PM, Alan Pevec wrote: >>>

Re: [openstack-dev] [puppet] stepping down from puppet-openstack core

On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 5:23 PM, Matt Fischer wrote: > I am stepping down as core in the puppet openstack project. This is the > culmination of a long and slow refocus of my work efforts into other areas. > Additionally I'm not sure what the future holds for me at this point,

Re: [Openstack-operators] [scientific] Resource reservation requirements (Blazar) - Forum session

Some combination of spot/OPIE and Blazar would seem doable as long as the resource provider reserves capacity appropriately (i.e. spot resources>>blazar committed along with no non-spot requests for the same aggregate). Is this feasible? Tim On 04.04.17, 19:21, "Jay Pipes"

[openstack-dev] [election] TC non-candidacy

Hi all, Thanks for letting me serve as a TC member. I will not be running this time around since fungi is serving from the OpenStack Foundation on the committee and ttx is more deserving for re-election. -- Mike Perez signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][networking-odl][qa] What's the recommended behavior for SG Rules with ethertype='IPv6' and protocol='icmp' ?

On 04/03/2017 09:23 PM, Ghanshyam Mann wrote: On Sun, Mar 26, 2017 at 9:31 PM, Sridhar Gaddam > wrote: On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 7:27 PM, Brian Haley > wrote: On 03/24/2017 06:41 AM,

Re: [openstack-dev] [kubernetes][go] External OpenStack Cloud Provider for Kubernetes

Excerpts from Chris Hoge's message of 2017-04-04 17:09:11 -0400: > > > On Apr 2, 2017, at 4:29 PM, Monty Taylor wrote: > > > > On 03/29/2017 03:39 PM, Steve Gordon wrote: > >> - Original Message - > >>> From: "Davanum Srinivas" > >>> To: "Chris

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] [gerrit] Fais to apply the change in project-config to gerrit

Hi Jeremy, I can see the "Create Branch" button on gerrit now. Thanks for clear details of what happened in infra side. best regards, Masahito On 2017/04/03 22:56, Jeremy Stanley wrote: On 2017-04-03 16:35:58 +0900 (+0900), Masahito MUROI wrote: I've pushed the change[1] to project-config

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Removing BDM devices from POST requests

> I raised the question though, could we move forward with removing the > device field from the "POST /servers/{server_id}/os-volume_attachments" > API since that doesn't do anything with image BDM overrides. Will this affect detaching/attaching of root volume

[OpenStack-Infra] New caching reverse proxies

Hello, Just a heads up that we are experimenting with new caching reverse proxies on our cloud region local mirror nodes. The idea here being that not every hosted resource is easily mirrorable but we can pretty easily cache them locally in regions to reduce errors and speed up downloads. More

Re: [Openstack-operators] [scientific] Resource reservation requirements (Blazar) - Forum session

Hi! Did someone mention automation changing the spot instance capacity? I did an article in 2013 that proposes exactly that. The model forecasts the workload curve of the majority traffic, which is presumed to be interactive, and the rest may be used for batch traffic. The forecast used is

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Engine facade

Hi, The problem that we have is that any foreign key usage under transactions is now broken. An example of an exception that is raised is: DBReferenceError: (sqlite3.IntegrityError) FOREIGN KEY constraint failed [SQL: u'INSERT INTO neutron_nsx_firewall_section_mappings (created_at,

[openstack-dev] [tacker] VNF Configuration injection issue

Hi, I'm running tacker and able to launch vnf through VNF manager. But the configuration of the VNF is not getting injected to VNF. Kindly help me in debugging of injection of configuration Please find below tosca config file tosca_definitions_version: tosca_simple_profile_for_nfv_1_0_0

[openstack-dev] [novaclient] novaclient and httpretty - unable to record

Sorry for asking in dev maillist, but it really looks like dev issue. I'm writing application which relies on novaclient, glanceclient, etc. It's almost done, but I thought about adding end to end tests by recording and actual requests and replies to openstack. I used httpretty library for

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Switching gate testing to use Ubuntu Cloud Archive

This is definitely a trade off, I know the last time we tried UCA we had such a high failure rate we had to revert. But, that was a much younger libvirt that was only just starting to get heavy testing in OpenStack. So it feels like it's worth a shot. It will at least be interesting to see if it

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Engine facade

Hi! This errors does not mean that foreign key usage is broken. This means that there is a mess with transactions. As you paste small piece of trace it is hard to say why this happen, but during my work I saw such errors and resolve them. And probably you need to revisit your unit tests. Please,

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Engine facade

I worked with Gary on IRC and discovered that we aren't making use of the flag added in [1], which makes adoption harder. I've proposed a patch to neutron-lib[2] that should alleviate some of these issues. 1. https://bugs.launchpad.net/oslo.db/+bug/1664643 2.

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Dev][Cinder][Driver][Nimble] - Need Point of contact

Their CI contact from the wiki ( https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/ThirdPartySystems/Nimble_Storage_CI ) is openstack...@nimblestorage.com - that's probably a good start. On 4 April 2017 at 11:58, nidhi.h...@wipro.com wrote: > Hi all, > > > I was working on few bugs related

Re: [Openstack-operators] Slow internet speed - Instances with floating IP

Adding the OpenStack list in hopes this might get some attention there. Thanks All, ___ John Petrini ___ OpenStack-operators mailing list OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] [nodepool] unable to get a floating IP

Thanks for help! Actually after all it was pretty obvious: network is checked by netaddr lib, so if your private network is reported as public by netaddr ( while physically being private ) the whole setup will think it's public. I changed my private network from 8.0.0.0/24 to 10.0.0.0/24 and

[openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Dev][Cinder][Driver][Nimble] - Need Point of contact

Hi all, I was working on few bugs related to Nimble cinder driver. I needed some clarification. May i know right point of contact for this? Who from nimble should be contacted for their cinder driver bugs? Thanks Nidhi The information contained in this electronic message and any

[openstack-dev] [nova] Nova API sub-team meeting

Hi All, We have weekly Nova API meeting tomorrow. The meeting is being held Wednesday UTC1300 and irc channel is #openstack-meeting-4. The proposed agenda and meeting details are here: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/NovaAPI Please feel free to add items to the agenda.

Re: [openstack-dev] [manila] share server frameworks for DHSS=False case

On 04/03/2017 03:58 PM, Valeriy Ponomaryov wrote: On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 10:00 PM, Ben Swartzlander > wrote: ... and we later gave up on supporting remote ZFS using SSH altogether. -Ben No, we didn't. It works. Just have couple

[openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] Adding a scenario for shade's functional tests

Hey all! I woke up early this morning and found myself thinking "I clearly don't have enough work on my plate, why don't I add some more?" I'd love to make a gate job that: - Deploys a cloud with openstack-ansible - Runs shade's functional tests against that cloud Which makes me think it

[openstack-dev] [election][tc] flaper87's candidacy to serve as a TC member

(m-l copy of my candidacy on https://review.openstack.org/453156 ) I'm announcing my candidacy for a position on the OpenStack Technical Committee. For those of you who don't know me yet, I'm Flavio Percoco. I'm currently employed by Red Hat and I've been in the Technical Committee for the last

[openstack-dev] [neutron] [classifier] CCF Meeting

Hi all, Reminding that the Common Classification Framework meeting is today in about an hour @ #openstack-meeting. Agenda: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Neutron/CommonFlowClassifier#Discussion_Topic_4_April_2017 Best regards, Igor.

Re: [openstack-dev] [novaclient] novaclient and httpretty - unable to record

On 04/04/2017 04:43 AM, George Shuklin wrote: Sorry for asking in dev maillist, but it really looks like dev issue. I'm writing application which relies on novaclient, glanceclient, etc. It's almost done, but I thought about adding end to end tests by recording and actual requests and replies

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Switching gate testing to use Ubuntu Cloud Archive

On 04/03/2017 06:06 PM, Clark Boylan wrote: Hello, One of the major sets of issues currently affecting gate testing is Libvirt stability. Elastic-recheck is tracking Libvirt crashes for us and they happen frequently [0][1][2]. These issues appear to only affect Ubuntu Xenial (and not Trusty or

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Engine facade

Thanks Kevin, We will also need https://review.openstack.org/#/c/453048/ in some way or form. From: Kevin Benton Reply-To: OpenStack List Date: Tuesday, April 4, 2017 at 1:18 PM To: OpenStack List Subject:

Re: [openstack-dev] [manila] share server frameworks for DHSS=False case

question below, not just for Ben. If you know, please respond. On 04/03/2017 03:00 PM, Ben Swartzlander wrote: > On 04/03/2017 02:24 PM, Tom Barron wrote: ... ... > While Manila doesn't care about 2 backends potentially sharing an IP, > you do have to consider how the m-shr services interact

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] Adding a scenario for shade's functional tests

On 4/4/17, 1:39 PM, "Monty Taylor" wrote: >I'd love to make a gate job that: > - Deploys a cloud with openstack-ansible > - Runs shade's functional tests against that cloud Fantastic. Let’s see how we can help. > Which makes me think it just needs to be an

[openstack-dev] [oslo][requirements][designate][cinder] Reverting eventlet version bump

Hey all, We recently increased the version of eventlet we're using. The bump was driven by python3.5 enablement for oslo.messaging, which is a great thing to have exist. However, it has hard-broken designate - and not just the docs builds like happened for other projects. There is a patch

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][requirements][designate][cinder] Reverting eventlet version bump

Monty, Got a link to "patch that has landed to upstream eventlet that will fix the designate issues"? Thanks, Dims On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 9:33 AM, Monty Taylor wrote: > Hey all, > > We recently increased the version of eventlet we're using. The bump was > driven by

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Switching gate testing to use Ubuntu Cloud Archive

On Mon, Apr 03, 2017 at 04:06:53PM -0700, Clark Boylan wrote: > Hello, > > One of the major sets of issues currently affecting gate testing is > Libvirt stability. Elastic-recheck is tracking Libvirt crashes for us > and they happen frequently [0][1][2]. These issues appear to only affect >

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Switching gate testing to use Ubuntu Cloud Archive

On Tue, Apr 04, 2017 at 07:16:51AM -0400, Sean Dague wrote: > This is definitely a trade off, I know the last time we tried UCA we had > such a high failure rate we had to revert. But, that was a much younger > libvirt that was only just starting to get heavy testing in OpenStack. > So it feels

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Switching gate testing to use Ubuntu Cloud Archive

On 4/4/17, 12:06 AM, "Clark Boylan" wrote: > After some thought I think my preferred method of rolling this out would > be to blacklist libvirt-python from our wheel mirror building entirely > and force installs to happen from source so that we are base Xenial and >

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][requirements][designate][cinder] Reverting eventlet version bump

On 04/04/2017 08:37 AM, Davanum Srinivas wrote: Monty, Got a link to "patch that has landed to upstream eventlet that will fix the designate issues"? https://github.com/eventlet/eventlet/commit/78f2ef8a81600d19d6d670803ef73747ab8d81b9 Thanks, Dims On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 9:33 AM, Monty

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][requirements][designate][cinder] Reverting eventlet version bump

Monty, I agree with your approach. Think we should not break other projects with a change like this and the answer thus far has been to just patch each project individually to work around the issues introduced by eventlet. So, I support this approach and think Sean would as well. Thanks,

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][networking-l2gw] openstack vtep setup missing docs

Hello Armando, I managed to implement the L2GW setup purely in software, without an hardware appliance. I documented in the README file, please look at this review https://review.openstack.org/453209 I have a question: do we have a name for this node where the actually bridging happens between

Re: [openstack-dev] [novaclient] novaclient and httpretty - unable to record

Thank you very much for advise! On 04/04/2017 04:09 PM, Monty Taylor wrote: On 04/04/2017 04:43 AM, George Shuklin wrote: Sorry for asking in dev maillist, but it really looks like dev issue. I'm writing application which relies on novaclient, glanceclient, etc. It's almost done, but I

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo][kolla] extended start and hostpath persistent dirs (was: kolla_bootstrap for non-openstack services)

On 03.04.2017 21:01, Dan Prince wrote: > On Mon, 2017-04-03 at 16:15 +0200, Bogdan Dobrelya wrote: >> Let's please re-evaluate configuration of containerized non- >> openstack, >> like database, message queue, key value, web, services for tripleo >> heat >> templates and Kolla. Here is an example

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Switching gate testing to use Ubuntu Cloud Archive

On Tue, Apr 4, 2017, at 06:36 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > On Mon, Apr 03, 2017 at 04:06:53PM -0700, Clark Boylan wrote: > > I have pushed a change to devstack [3] to enable using UCA which pulls > > in new Libvirt and mostly seems to work. I think we should consider > > switching to UCA as

Re: [openstack-dev] [novaclient] novaclient and httpretty - unable to record

On 4/4/2017 8:09 AM, Monty Taylor wrote: On 04/04/2017 04:43 AM, George Shuklin wrote: Sorry for asking in dev maillist, but it really looks like dev issue. I'm writing application which relies on novaclient, glanceclient, etc. It's almost done, but I thought about adding end to end tests by

[openstack-dev] [infra] Stop enabling EPEL mirror by default

Greetings, Recently we've been running into some issues keeping our EPEL mirror properly sync'd. We are working to fix this, however we'd also like to do the following: Stop enabling EPEL mirror by default https://review.openstack.org/#/c/453222/ For the most part, we enable EPEL for our

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Switching gate testing to use Ubuntu Cloud Archive

I mentioned that in a meeting today but for greater visibility... This change in how we gate against LTS raises a question whether what we claim in: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/402940/4/reference/project-testing-interface.rst is still valid. The wording of the document is such that suggests

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Switching gate testing to use Ubuntu Cloud Archive

On Tue, Apr 04, 2017 at 09:21:27AM -0700, Clark Boylan wrote: > On Tue, Apr 4, 2017, at 06:36 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 03, 2017 at 04:06:53PM -0700, Clark Boylan wrote: > > > I have pushed a change to devstack [3] to enable using UCA which pulls > > > in new Libvirt and mostly

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][requirements][designate][cinder] Reverting eventlet version bump

On 04/04/2017 09:19 AM, Jay S Bryant wrote: Monty, I agree with your approach. Think we should not break other projects with a change like this and the answer thus far has been to just patch each project individually to work around the issues introduced by eventlet. So, I support this

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] Stop enabling EPEL mirror by default

On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 1:02 PM, Paul Belanger wrote: > Greetings, > > Recently we've been running into some issues keeping our EPEL mirror properly > sync'd. We are working to fix this, however we'd also like to do the > following: > > Stop enabling EPEL mirror by

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Switching gate testing to use Ubuntu Cloud Archive

On 04/04/2017 12:05 PM, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: I mentioned that in a meeting today but for greater visibility... This change in how we gate against LTS raises a question whether what we claim in: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/402940/4/reference/project-testing-interface.rst is still valid.

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] Stop enabling EPEL mirror by default

It'll affect kolla-kubernetes, but we have a patch ready to go. Go for it. Thanks, Kevin From: Emilien Macchi [emil...@redhat.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 04, 2017 10:28 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re:

[openstack-dev] [refstack][interop-wg] Nomination of Luz Cazares as RefStack core

Hello everyone, I would like to nominate Luz Cazares as a core reviewer for the RefStack project. Luz is one of the main contributors and has been actively providing reviews and feedback over the last year in our project. She will be a fantastic addition to the RefStack core review team.

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][requirements][designate][cinder] Reverting eventlet version bump

Excerpts from Monty Taylor's message of 2017-04-04 12:19:36 -0500: > On 04/04/2017 09:19 AM, Jay S Bryant wrote: > > Monty, > > > > I agree with your approach. Think we should not break other projects > > with a change like this and the answer thus far has been to just patch > > each project