Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] Stepping down as core

Sam, Thank you so much for all your contributions to ironic! I'll miss you. I'm glad you aren't disappearing though :) --ruby On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 4:41 AM Sam Betts (sambetts) wrote: > As many of you will have seen on IRC, I've mostly been appearing AFK for > the last couple of development

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic][bifrost][sushy][ironic-inspector][ironic-ui][virtualbmc] sub-project/repository core reviewer changes

What is there to say? ++ :) and :(. --ruby On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 2:24 PM Julia Kreger wrote: > Greetings everyone! > > In our team meeting this week we stumbled across the subject of > promoting contributors to be sub-project's core reviewers. > Traditionally it is something we've only

Re: [openstack-dev] Stepping down from Ironic core

Hi John, So sorry to hear this but totally understandable! Thanks for letting us know and for everything you've done! Enjoy life without ironic :) --ruby On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 10:39 AM John Villalovos wrote: > Good morning Ironic, > > I have come to realize that I don't have the time needed

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] ironic-staging-drivers: what to do?

Hi, On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 2:40 PM, Julia Kreger wrote: > Greetings fellow ironicans! > > As many of you might know an openstack/ironic-staging-drivers[1] > repository exists. What most might not know is that it was > intentionally created outside of ironic's governance[2]. > ... > > This

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] ironic-staging-drivers: what to do?

Hi Julia, Thanks for bringing this up. On Mon, Aug 13, 2018, 2:41 PM Julia Kreger, wrote: > Greetings fellow ironicans! > > As many of you might know an openstack/ironic-staging-drivers[1] > repository exists. What most might not know is that it was > intentionally created outside of ironic's

[openstack-dev] use of storyboard (was [TC] Stein Goal Selection)

Hi, I don't want to hijack the initial thread, but am now feeling somewhat guilty about not being vocal wrt Storyboard. Yes, ironic migrated to Storyboard in the beginning of this cycle. To date, I have not been pleased with replacing Launchpad with Storyboard. I believe that Storyboard is

Re: [openstack-dev] Proposing Mark Goddard to ironic-core

++. Great suggestion! --ruby On Sun, May 20, 2018 at 10:45 AM, Julia Kreger wrote: > Greetings everyone! > > I would like to propose Mark Goddard to ironic-core. I am aware he > recently joined kolla-core, but his contributions in ironic have been > insightful and

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic][stable] Re-adding Jim Rollenhagen to ironic stable maintenance team?

On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 7:50 AM, Julia Kreger wrote: > Greetings folks, > > Is there any objection if we re-add Jim to the ironic-stable-maint > team? He was a member prior to his brief departure and I think it > would be good to have another set of hands that can

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] Monthly bug day?

Hi Mike, If we hold it, I'll (try to) be there :) Thanks for spearheading this! --ruby On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 8:04 AM, Michael Turek wrote: > Hey everyone! > > We had a bug day about two weeks ago and it went pretty well! At last > week's IRC meeting the idea of

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] Ironic Bug Day on Thursday April 12th @ 1:00 PM - 3:00 PM (UTC)

Hi Mike, This works for me. We can refine/discuss at the bug squashing event. Thanks! --ruby On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 2:53 PM, Michael Turek wrote: > Sorry this is so late but as for the format of the event I think we should > do something like this: > > 1) Go

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] team dinner at Dublin PTG?

On Mon, Feb 5, 2018 at 5:42 PM, Loo, Ruby wrote: > Hi ironic-ers, > > Planning for the Dublin PTG has started. And what's the most important > thing (and most fun event) to plan for? You got it, the team dinner! We'd > like to get an idea of who is interested and what evening

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic] Removal of tempest plugin code from openstack/ironic & openstack/ironic-inspector

On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 11:29 PM, wrote: > Thanks for response. > My recommendation is: > 1. only allow patches into openstack/ironic-tempest-plugin > 2. Give Ironic CI owners time period (3 weeks?) to switch their setup to > only use openstack/ironic-tempest-plugin and

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] reminder about deadlines

On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 9:15 AM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: > Hi all! > > Half of the Queens cycle is behind us. I'd like to remind about a few > deadlines and how they affect us: > > 1. Jan 18th is the non-client library release deadline. It affects > ironic-lib and sushy. The

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] Summary of ironic sessions from Sydney

Thank you Julia, for sacrificing yourself and going to Australia; I'm glad the koalas didn't get you :) This summary is GREAT! I'm trying to figure out how we take all these asks into consideration with all the existing asks and TODOs that are on our plate. I guess the best plan of action (and a

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] automatic migration from classic drivers to hardware types?

Thanks for bringing this up Dmitry. See inline... On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 5:05 PM, Alex Schultz wrote: > On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 8:10 AM, Dmitry Tantsur > wrote: > > Hi folks! > > > > This was raised several times, now I want to bring it to the wider >

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] moving the weekly meeting to our channel?

On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 3:35 AM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: > Hi all, > > Due to a technical issue we had to have our weekly meeting in our main > channel this time. And we liked it :) I wonder if we should switch to it. > > Pros: > * easier to find > * no channel switching > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] inclusion of openstack/networking-generic-switch project under OpenStack baremetal program

On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 4:41 AM, Shivanand Tendulker wrote: > Thank you. I too vote for 'Option 1'. > > Thanks and Regards > Shiv > > > > On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 1:03 AM, Villalovos, John L < > john.l.villalo...@intel.com> wrote: > >> Thanks for sending this out. >> >> >>

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][neutron][cinder][infra] openstack-tox-py27 job is not executed when spec files are added or modified in nova-specs

On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 1:17 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: > On 11/16/2017 12:15 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: > >> On 11/16/2017 9:58 AM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: >> >>> On 2017-11-16 15:17:58 +0900 (+0900), Takashi Natsume wrote: >>> In nova-specs project, there is an

Re: [Openstack-operators] [openstack-dev] [ironic] replace node "tags" with node "traits"

Hi, Thanks for your 3 votes. Every vote counts; you've convinced me of the usefulness of having both tags and traits as separate features. I shall advocate for you all :) --ruby On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 5:41 AM, Vladyslav Drok wrote: > > > On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 12:19 AM,

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] [Openstack-operators] replace node "tags" with node "traits"

Hi, Thanks for your 3 votes. Every vote counts; you've convinced me of the usefulness of having both tags and traits as separate features. I shall advocate for you all :) --ruby On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 5:41 AM, Vladyslav Drok wrote: > > > On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 12:19 AM,

Re: [Openstack-operators] [openstack-dev] [ironic] replace node "tags" with node "traits"

Sending again, I don't think it went to openstack-operators@. --ruby On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 10:17 AM, Loo, Ruby wrote: > Hello ironic'ers, > > > > A while ago, we approved a spec to add node tag support to ironic [1]. The > feature itself did not land yet (although some of

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] [Openstack-operators] replace node "tags" with node "traits"

Sending again, I don't think it went to openstack-operators@. --ruby On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 10:17 AM, Loo, Ruby wrote: > Hello ironic'ers, > > > > A while ago, we approved a spec to add node tag support to ironic [1]. The > feature itself did not land yet (although some of

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] Team dinner at the PTG?

Thanks Julia, for taking this on. I'm actually fine if we take a cab to wherever, it seems like the PTG is in some sort of 'dead' zone wrt great food for large groups :-( Having said that, stapleton-caseys works for me, especially if they take reservations. My personal preference is for sushi

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic][docs] I see, you see, we all see red*

Hi Alex, Sorry, I don't know much about the docs stuff; Andreas' links were useful for enlightening me. Clearly, I'm biased and would prefer no difference in colour. What about that (darker?) blue from [0], where it sez (I'm referring to the upper-cased words here) 'Modern color theory uses

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][docs] Concerns with docs migration

On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 10:55 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote: > ... > > b) I think that if we're going to refactor the Nova devref home page to be > a certain format, then we should really consider doing the same thing in > the other projects, because today they are all different

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Performance concerns over all the new notifications

On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 11:07 PM, Joshua Harlow wrote: > Matt Riedemann wrote: > >> There are a lot of specs up for review in ocata related to adding new >> versioned notifications for operations that we didn't have notifications >> on before, like CRUD operations on

Re: [openstack-dev] Event notification descriptors/schemas (? swagger ?)

On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 7:14 PM, Joshua Harlow wrote: > >> This is exactly what we are planning to do. Work is ongoing to add >> to_json_schema >> support for every VersionedObject field [1]. Then we would like to add a >> small >> tool to nova that makes it possible to

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] [infra] RFC: consolidating and extending Ironic CI jobs

On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 2:13 PM, Devananda van der Veen < devananda@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On 10/12/2016 05:01 AM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: > > Hi folks! > > > > I'd like to propose a plan on how to simultaneously extend the coverage > of our > > jobs and reduce their number. > > > > Currently,

Re: [openstack-dev] [elections][tc]Thoughts on the TC election process

On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 12:08 PM, Chris Dent wrote: > > Based on the turnout numbers and a bit of unscientific number > crunching on the voting results it seems that the electorate was > rather more engaged this time around. That's _great_. > > As others have said I

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-docs] Admin guide in-tree?

>From my point of view, the rush is so that we can be more efficient with all of our time/efforts. In ironic, we have a bit of a mess. We now have duplicated (and perhaps out-of-sync) admin-related information in our developer docs [1] as well as in the official admin guide [2] -- the latter

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] openstack/python-ironicclient

On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 12:38 PM, Dean Troyer <dtro...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 10:51 AM, Ruby Loo <opensr...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> My preference is: >> >> * openstack baremetal driver show --raid-logical-disk-properties >> >

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] openstack/python-ironicclient

On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 8:11 AM, Galyna Zholtkevych < gzholtkev...@mirantis.com> wrote: > Dear all, > > Ironic community needs a help to decide on the specification > > of the openstack client command that provide the same functionality as > > 'ironic driver-raid-logical-disk-properties' . > >

[openstack-dev] [ironic][OpenStackClient] deprecated commands (was Re: Upcoming OpenStackClient 3.0 Release (Monday))

Hi, On Sun, Aug 21, 2016 at 9:08 PM, Dean Troyer wrote: > We're excited to pre-announce the release of OSC 3.0.0. The release is > expected to be approved by the release team during their working hours on > Monday 22 Aug 2016. > > This is a **huge** release, and we shuffled

[openstack-dev] [ironic] weekly subteam status report

Hi, We are yodelling to present this week's subteam report for Ironic. As usual, this is pulled directly from the Ironic whiteboard[0] and formatted. Bugs (dtantsur) === - Stats (diff with 18 July 2016) - Ironic: 216 bugs (+15) + 204 wishlist items (+3). 21 new (+8), 160 in progress

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] API docs now publishing from our tree

Sweet. Thanks Jim (and everyone else that made this happen). I do want to make sure there is one "source of truth" to the API documentation. We are already generating REST API documentation at http://docs.openstack.org/developer/ironic/webapi/v1.html. The info for this comes from docstrings etc

[openstack-dev] [ironic] Newton priorities and primary contacts

Hi, At the Austin summit, we had a session where we discussed and decided on what the top priorities would be for ironic, in the newton development cycle. The etherpad [1] captures that discussion, and there is a patch up to add the newton priorities to our specs [2]. Everyone, and in particular

[openstack-dev] [ironic] upgrade support between which versions of ironic?

Hi, Currently, ironic doesn't support ("live", "online", "rolling", or minimal-downtime) upgrades between named versions of ironic. (Where "named version" is the final release or stable release that is associated with a development cycle). So for example, Liberty -> Mitaka release. We've been

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] weekly subteam status report

On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 3:10 PM, Ruby Loo <opensr...@gmail.com> wrote: > ... > Network isolation (Neutron/Ironic work) (jroll) > === > - Still needs review > - cross-project session tuesday on the future of bare meta

[openstack-dev] [ironic] weekly subteam status report

Hi, We are overjoyed to present this week's subteam report for Ironic. As usual, this is pulled directly from the Ironic whiteboard[0] and formatted. Bugs (dtantsur) === - Stats (diff with 11.04.2016): - Ironic: 203 bugs (+3) + 166 wishlist items (+3). 30 new (+5), 134 in progress

[openstack-dev] [ironic] weekly subteam status report

Hi, We are nerdy to present this week's subteam report for Ironic. As usual, this is pulled directly from the Ironic whiteboard[0] and formatted. Bugs (dtantsur) === - Stats (diff with 04.04.2016): - Ironic: 200 bugs (+4) + 163 wishlist items. 25 new, 136 in progress (+1), 0

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic][nova][horizon] Serial console support for ironic instances

Yes, I think it would be good to have a summit session on that. However, before the session, it would really be helpful if the folks with proposals got together and/or reviewed each other's proposals, and summarized their findings. You may find after reviewing the proposals, that eg only 2 are

[openstack-dev] [ironic] weekly subteam status report

Hi, We are merry to present this week's subteam report for Ironic. As usual, this is pulled directly from the Ironic whiteboard[0] and formatted. Bugs (dtantsur) === - Stats (diff with 28.03.2016): - Ironic: 196 bugs (+17) + 163 wishlist items (-1). 28 new (+3), 135 in progress

[openstack-dev] [ironic] weekly subteam status report

Hi, We are lucky to present this week's subteam report for Ironic. As usual, this is pulled directly from the Ironic whiteboard[0] and formatted. Bugs (dtantsur) === - Stats (diff with 14.03.2016): - Ironic: 179 bugs (+12) + 164 wishlist items (-10). 25 new (+6), 124 in progress

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] Nominating Julia Kreger for core reviewer

On 24 March 2016 at 15:08, Jim Rollenhagen wrote: > Hey all, > > I'm nominating Julia Kreger (TheJulia in IRC) for ironic-core. She runs > the Bifrost project, gives super valuable reviews, is beginning to lead > the boot from volume efforts, and is clearly an expert in

[openstack-dev] [ironic] weekly subteam status report

Hi, We are keen to present this week's subteam report for Ironic. As usual, this is pulled directly from the Ironic whiteboard[0] and formatted. Bugs (dtantsur) === - Stats (diff with 07.03.2016): - Ironic: 167 bugs (+10) + 174 wishlist items (-1). 19 new (+3), 121 in progress (-2),

[openstack-dev] [ironic] weekly subteam status report

Hi, We are jubilant to present this week's subteam report for Ironic. As usual, this is pulled directly from the Ironic whiteboard[0] and formatted. Bugs (dtantsur) === - Stats (diff with 07.03.2016): - Ironic: 167 bugs (+10) + 174 wishlist items (-1). 19 new (+3), 121 in progress

[openstack-dev] [ironic] weekly subteam status report

Hi, We are itchy to present this week's subteam report for Ironic. As usual, this is pulled directly from the Ironic whiteboard[0] and formatted. Bugs (dtantsur) === - Stats (diff with 29.02.2016): - Ironic: 157 bugs (-5) + 175 wishlist items (-3). 16 new, 115 in progress (-8), 0

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] Remember to follow RFE process

> Hi, >> >> > Ironic'ers, please remember to follow the RFE process; especially the >> cores. >> > >> > I noticed that a patch [1] got merged yesterday. The patch was >> associated >> > with an RFE [2] that hadn't been approved yet :-( What caught my eye was >> > that the commit message didn't

[openstack-dev] When to revert a patch?

Hijacked from ' [openstack-dev] [ironic] Remember to follow RFE process' thread: > Should we revert the patch [1] for now? (Disclaimer. I haven't looked at >> the >> > patch itself. But I don't think I should have to, to know what the API >> > change is.) >> > >> >> Thanks for calling it out

[openstack-dev] [ironic] Remember to follow RFE process

Hi, Ironic'ers, please remember to follow the RFE process; especially the cores. I noticed that a patch [1] got merged yesterday. The patch was associated with an RFE [2] that hadn't been approved yet :-( What caught my eye was that the commit message didn't describe the actual API change so I

[openstack-dev] [ironic] weekly subteam status report

Hi, We are happy to present this week's subteam report for Ironic. As usual, this is pulled directly from the Ironic whiteboard[0] and formatted. Bugs (dtantsur) === - Stats (diff with 22.02.2016): - Ironic: 162 bugs (+6) + 178 wishlist items (+3). 16 new (+2), 123 in progress (+5),

[openstack-dev] [ironic] weekly subteam status report

Hi, We are glad to present this week's subteam report for Ironic. As usual, this is pulled directly from the Ironic whiteboard[0] and formatted. Bugs (dtantsur) === - Stats (diff with 08.02.2016): - Ironic: 156 bugs (-1) + 175 wishlist items (+5). 14 new, 118 in progress (+2), 0

[openstack-dev] [ironic] weekly subteam status report

Hi, We are elated to present this week's subteam report for Ironic. As usual, this is pulled directly from the Ironic whiteboard[0] and formatted. Bugs (dtantsur) === - Stats (diff with 25.01.2016): - Ironic: 151 bugs (-1) + 171 wishlist items (+7). 14 new (-1), 111 in progress

[openstack-dev] [ironic] weekly subteam status report

Gate failures dominated the news last week and as this week starts to pick up steam, it looks like gate failures will again dominate the news. On other fronts... Hi, We are delighted to present this week's subteam report for Ironic. As usual, this is pulled directly from the Ironic

[openstack-dev] [ironic] weekly status report

Hi, We are cool to present this week's subteam report for Ironic. As usual, this is pulled directly from the Ironic whiteboard[0] and formatted. Bugs (dtantsur) === - Stats (diff with 11.01.2016): - Ironic: 148 bugs (+1) + 162 wishlist items (+4). 15 new (+1), 102 in progress

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][osdk] PrettyTable needs a home in OpenStack

On 11 January 2016 at 10:27, Doug Hellmann wrote: > ... > > > There are a few libraries on the list, too (automaton, ironic-lib), and > that's confusing. It would be interesting to know how they're using > table output. > > Doug > > As far as ironic-lib goes, I took a

[openstack-dev] [ironic] weekly subteam report

Hi, We are buzzed to present this week's subteam report for Ironic. As usual, this is pulled directly from the Ironic whiteboard[0] and formatted. Bugs (dtantsur) === - Stats (diff with 04.01.2016): - Ironic: 147 bugs (-4) + 158 wishlist items (+9). 14 new (-9), 99 in progress

[openstack-dev] [ironic] weekly subteam status report

Hi, We are amazed to present this week's subteam report for Ironic. As usual, this is pulled directly from the Ironic whiteboard[0] and formatted. Bugs (dtantsur) === - Stats (diff with 21.12.2015): - Ironic: 151 bugs (+8) + 149 wishlist items. 23 new (+5), 92 in progress (+1), 0

[openstack-dev] [ironic] weekly subteam status report

Hi, We are eager to present this week's subteam report for Ironic. As usual, this is pulled directly from the Ironic whiteboard[0] and formatted. Bugs (dtantsur) === - (no diff) - Ironic: 143 bugs + 149 wishlist items. 18 new, 89 in progress, 0 critical, 14 high and 9 incomplete -

[openstack-dev] [ironic] weekly subteam status report

Hi, We are overjoyed to present this week's subteam report for Ironic. As usual, this is pulled directly from the Ironic whiteboard[0] and formatted. Bugs (dtantsur) === (diff with Dec 7) - Open: 179 (+4). 16 new (+4), 58 in progress (-3), 0 critical (-1), 13 high (-3) and 9

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic]Ironic operations on nodes in maintenance mode

On 23 November 2015 at 18:35, Shraddha Pandhe wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to know how everyone is using maintenance mode and what is > expected from admins about nodes in maintenance. The reason I am bringing > up this topic is because, most of the ironic

[openstack-dev] [ironic] weekly subteam status report

Hi, We are pleased to present this week's subteam report for Ironic. As usual, this is pulled directly from the Ironic whiteboard[0] and formatted. Bugs (dtantsur) === (diff with Nov 30) - Open: 175 (+1). 12 new (+1), 61 in progress (+1), 1 critical (+1), 16 high and 9

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] Announcing Third Party CI for Proliant iLO Drivers

On 30 November 2015 at 11:25, Gururaj Grandhi wrote: > Hi, > > > > This is to announce that we have setup a Third Party CI > environment for Proliant iLO Drivers. The results will be posted under > "HP Proliant CI check" section in Non-voting mode. We will

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo][ironic][heat] Adding back the tripleo check job

On 30 November 2015 at 10:19, Derek Higgins wrote: > Hi All, > > A few months tripleo switch from its devtest based CI to one that was > based on instack. Before doing this we anticipated disruption in the ci > jobs and removed them from non tripleo projects. > > We'd

[openstack-dev] [ironic] weekly subteam status report

Hi, We are elated to present this week's subteam report for Ironic. As usual, this is pulled directly from the Ironic whiteboard[0] and formatted. Bugs (dtantsur) === (diff with Nov 23) - Open: 174 (+3). 11 new, 60 in progress, 0 critical, 16 high and 11 incomplete - Nova bugs

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] Releases and things

On 25 November 2015 at 18:02, Jim Rollenhagen wrote: > Hi all, > > We're approaching OpenStack's M-1 milestone, and as we have lots of good > stuff in the master branch, and no Mitaka release yet, I'd like to make > a release next Thursday, December 3. > > First, I've

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic][security] what is OK to put in DEBUG logs?

On 20 November 2015 at 18:32, Ben Nemec wrote: > On 11/19/2015 06:00 AM, Lucas Alvares Gomes wrote: > > Hi, > > > >> Also keep in mind that DEBUG logging, while still should have some > masking > >> of data, since it is explicitly called out (or should be) as not safe >

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] specs process for ironic-inspector

On 19 November 2015 at 08:39, Pavlo Shchelokovskyy < pshchelokovs...@mirantis.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > +1 for specs in general, big features require a proper review and > discussion for which LP is not a good choice. > > +1 for not requiring a spec for small features, LP BP is enough for just >

[openstack-dev] [ironic] weekly subteam status report

Hi, We are stoked to present this week's subteam report for Ironic. As usual, this is pulled directly from the Ironic whiteboard[0] and formatted. Bugs (dtantsur) === (diff with Nov 16) - Open: 171 (+4). 11 new (+1), 60 in progress (-1), 0 critical, 16 high (+2) and 11

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] weekly subteam status report

On 17 November 2015 at 01:34, Naohiro Tamura wrote: > Ruby, > > Thanks for taking care of our weekly status report. > I'd like to just let you know that the iRMC part is somehow consolidated > with old statuses which I reported two and three weeks ago. > If this

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic] [OSC] Quick poll: OpenStackClient command for provision action

On 19 November 2015 at 09:25, Brad P. Crochet wrote: > I have pushed up a draft of the spec. Let's move comments there. > > I tried to incorporate as much as I could from the discussion here. > There was a lot of disjointed suggestions and was a bit difficult to > follow. So

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic] Do we need to have a mid-cycle?

> > Another idea I floated last week was to do a virtual midcycle of sorts. > > Treat it like a normal midcycle in that everyone tells their management > > "I'm out for 3-4 days for the midcycle", but they don't travel anywhere. > > We come up with an agenda, see if there's any planning/syncing

[openstack-dev] [ironic][security] what is OK to put in DEBUG logs?

Hi, I think we all agree that it isn't OK to log credentials (like passwords) in DEBUG logs. However, what about other information that might be sensitive? A patch was recently submitted to log (in debug) the SWIFT temporary URL [1]. I agree that it would be useful for debugging, but since that

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][ironic] Ironic-Neutron meeting cancellation notice

On 15 November 2015 at 16:47, Sukhdev Kapur wrote: > Folks, > > We are canceling this week's Ironic-neutron integration meeting. I have a > family obligation to take care of and I have not been able to find a > replacement person who can chair this meeting. Therefore, we

[openstack-dev] [ironic] weekly subteam status report

Hi, We are stoked to present this week's subteam report for Ironic. As usual, this is pulled directly from the Ironic whiteboard[0] and formatted. Bugs (dtantsur) (diff with Nov 9) - Open: 167 (-4). 10 new (-2), 61 in progress (-2), 0 critical, 14 high and 11 incomplete (+1) - Nova

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic] Quick poll: OpenStackClient command for provision action

On 10 November 2015 at 11:31, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: > On 11/10/2015 05:21 PM, Brad P. Crochet wrote: > >> On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 4:09 AM, Dmitry Tantsur >> wrote: >> >>> Hi all! >>> >>> I'd like to seek consensus (or at least some opinions) on patch

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic] Do we need to have a mid-cycle?

On 10 November 2015 at 12:08, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: > On 11/10/2015 05:45 PM, Lucas Alvares Gomes wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> In the last Ironic meeting [1] we started a discussion about whether >> we need to have a mid-cycle meeting for the Mitaka cycle or not. Some >> ideas

[openstack-dev] [ironic] weekly subteam status report

Hi, Following is the subteam report for Ironic. As usual, this is pulled directly from the Ironic whiteboard[0] and formatted. Bugs (dtantsur) (diff with Oct 19) - Open: 171 (+11). 12 new (+9), 63 in progress (+22), 0 critical, 14 high (+3) and 10 incomplete (-1) - Nova bugs with

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic] Driver documentation in Ironic

> > 2) Driver docs may not be backported to stable branches. This is a > stable maintenance policy, not an Ironic policy. This problem is > somewhat unique to Ironic as most major projects have deployer docs in > the Ops guide repo, rather than in the code repo. I'm going to chat with > some

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic] Driver documentation in Ironic

Hi Ramesh, On 15 October 2015 at 11:53, Ramakrishnan G wrote: > > > So what all are the problems ? > 1) Ability to update the driver documentation not-related to Ironic easily > without waiting. > 2) To save some core reviewers time who might not be familiar with

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic] Driver documentation in Ironic

Hi Wan-yen, On 19 October 2015 at 01:46, Wan-yen Hsu wrote: > > > I fully agreed with Ramesh. There is a need for driver owners to be able > to quickly update their driver’s document. Particularly, vendor's drivers > have strong > What do you mean by 'quickly'? Quicker

[openstack-dev] [ironic] weekly subteam status report

Hi, Following is the subteam report for Ironic. As usual, this is pulled directly from the Ironic whiteboard[0] and formatted. Bugs (dtantsur) (diff with Oct 12, no diff for inspector) - Open: 150 (+7). 3 new (+1), 41 in progress (+5), 2 critical (+2), 11 high (-1) and 11 incomplete

[openstack-dev] [ironic] weekly subteam status report

Hi, Following is the subteam report for Ironic. As usual, this is pulled directly from the Ironic whiteboard[0] and formatted. Bugs (dtantsur) - (diff with Oct 5, no diff for inspector) - Open: 143 (+6). 2 new (-2), 36 in progress (+2), 0 critical, 12 high (+5) and 10 incomplete

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] Nominating two new core reviewers

Looking forward to more cores!!! On 8 October 2015 at 17:47, Jim Rollenhagen wrote: > Hi all, > > ... I'd like to nominate Vladyslav Drok (vdrok) for the core team. His reviews > have been super high quality, and the quantity is ever-increasing. He's > also started

[openstack-dev] [ironic] weekly subteam status report

Hi, Following is the subteam report for Ironic. As usual, this is pulled directly from the Ironic whiteboard[0] and formatted. Bugs (dtantsur) - (diff with Sep 28, no diff for inspector) - Open: 137 (+2). 4 new (-5), 34 in progress (-2), 0 critical, 7 high and 13 incomplete (+4)

[openstack-dev] [ironic] weekly subteam status report

Hi, Following is the subteam report for Ironic. As usual, this is pulled directly from the Ironic whiteboard[0] and formatted. Bugs (dtantsur) (diff with Sep 21) - Open: 135 (-1). 9 new (+2), 36 in progress (-5), 0 critical, 7 high (-5) and 9 incomplete - Nova bugs with Ironic tag:

[openstack-dev] [ironic] weekly subteam status report

Hi, Following is the subteam report for Ironic. As usual, this is pulled directly from the Ironic whiteboard[0] and formatted. Bugs (dtantsur) As of Mon, Sep 21 (diff with Sep 14) - Open: 136 (-6). 7 new (-4), 41 in progress (-7), 0 critical, 12 high (+1) and 9 incomplete - Nova

[openstack-dev] [ironic] subteam leads

Hi Subteam Leads, In today's weekly meeting[1], it was requested that if you have no updates, to please indicate that in the status report, so that we can distinguish between no-update versus not-providing-a-status-report. If you aren't sure whether you're a lead, we think you are if your name

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] Liberty soft freeze

On 17 September 2015 at 21:50, Jim Rollenhagen wrote: This may also mean in-band RAID configuration may not land; the > interface in general did land, and drivers may do out-of-band > configuration. We assumed that in-band RAID would be done through > zapping. However,

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic] Suggestion to split install guide

On 11 September 2015 at 04:56, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: > Hi all! > > Our install guide is huge, and I've just approved even more text for it. > WDYT about splitting it into "Basic Install Guide", which will contain bare > minimum for running ironic and deploying instances, and

[openstack-dev] [ironic] weekly subteam status report

Hi, Following is the subteam report for Ironic. As usual, this is pulled directly from the Ironic whiteboard[0] and formatted. Bugs (dtantsur) As of Mon, Sep 14 (diff with Sep 7) - Open: 142 (+4). 11 new (+1), 48 in progress, 0 critical, 11 high and 8 incomplete (-1) - Nova bugs

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Base feature deprecation policy

On 3 September 2015 at 08:22, Thierry Carrez wrote: > ... > In particular, the current proposal says: > > "At the very minimum the feature [...] should be marked deprecated (and > still be supported) in the next two coordinated end-of-cyle releases. > For example, a

[openstack-dev] [ironic] weekly subteam status report

Hi, Following is the subteam report for Ironic. As usual, this is pulled directly from the Ironic whiteboard[0] and formatted. Bugs (dtantsur) As of Mon, Aug 31 (diff with Aug 24) - Open: 144 (+3). 9 new (+4), 50 in progress, 0 critical, 13 high and 10 (+1) incomplete - Nova bugs

[openstack-dev] [ironic] final release in Liberty cycle

Hi, As (most of) you are aware, in this cycle, ironic decided to switch to a feature-based release model[0]. Our first semver release, 4.0.0, was tagged this week but a few more things need to be ironed out still (hopefully there will be an announcement about that in the near future). What I

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic] Let's talk about API versions

On 20 August 2015 at 23:19, Ruby Loo rlooya...@gmail.com wrote: On 18 August 2015 at 17:13, Ruby Loo rlooya...@gmail.com wrote: On 18 August 2015 at 13:08, Lucas Alvares Gomes lucasago...@gmail.com wrote: HI Hi, I'd like to make sure I understand. Is it the case that ideally, if we

[openstack-dev] [ironic] weekly subteam status report

Hi, Following is the subteam report for Ironic. As usual, this is pulled directly from the Ironic whiteboard[0] and formatted. Bugs (dtantsur) As of Mon, Aug 24 (diff with Aug 10) - Open: 141 (-1). 5 new (-1), 50 in progress, 0 critical, 13 high (+1) and 9 incomplete - Nova bugs

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic] Let's talk about API versions

On 18 August 2015 at 17:13, Ruby Loo rlooya...@gmail.com wrote: On 18 August 2015 at 13:08, Lucas Alvares Gomes lucasago...@gmail.com wrote: HI Hi, I'd like to make sure I understand. Is it the case that ideally, if we could go back in time, we'd like to change the client so

[openstack-dev] New API for node create, specifying initial provision state

that I may not feel the need to reply :-) --ruby maybe chop off this and above when replying :-) On 17 August 2015 at 20:20, Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.net wrote: On 11 August 2015 at 06:13, Ruby Loo rlooya...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, sorry for the delay. I vote no. I understand

[openstack-dev] [ironic] Re: New API for node create, specifying initial provision state

Apologies, forgot to add [ironic] to the subject. On 18 August 2015 at 13:27, Ruby Loo rlooya...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I want to start a different thread on this topic because I don't think this is about whether/how to do API microversions. Rather, given that we are going to support

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] Re: New API for node create, specifying initial provision state

On 17 August 2015 at 20:20, Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.net wrote: On 11 August 2015 at 06:13, Ruby Loo rlooya...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, sorry for the delay. I vote no. I understand the rationale of trying to do things so that we don't break our users but that's what

  1   2   >