Hi,
The gate is once again broken:
2013-10-10 05:15:05.036 | Traceback (most recent call last):
2013-10-10 05:15:05.036 | File
/home/jenkins/workspace/gate-nova-python26/nova/tests/test_api.py, line 389,
in test_group_name_valid_length_security_group
2013-10-10 05:15:05.036 |
Thanks for the pointer -- was not able to attend that meeting,
unfortunately. Couple of observations, based on what I've heard till now.
1. I think it is important not to restrict the discussion to Nova
resources. So, I like the general direction in [1] to target a generic
mechanism and API.
Same on trunk!
From: Administrator gkot...@vmware.commailto:gkot...@vmware.com
Reply-To: OpenStack Development Mailing List
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.orgmailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Date: Thursday, October 10, 2013 9:10 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List
Hi Gary:
Same problem with me. There may be some races between the parallelled
unittests.
2013/10/10 Gary Kotton gkot...@vmware.com
Hi,
The gate is once again broken:
2013-10-10 05:15:05.036 | Traceback (most recent call last):
2013-10-10 05:15:05.036 | File
Be patient. We can try to debug by ourselves to help the infra-team figure
it out.
2013/10/10 Gary Kotton gkot...@vmware.com
Same on trunk!
From: Administrator gkot...@vmware.com
Reply-To: OpenStack Development Mailing List
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Date: Thursday, October 10,
Hi,
The problem seems to be with the boto python library. I am not really familiar
with this but I have seen this is the last – we may need to update the
requirements again to exclude a specific version.
Thanks
Gary
From: Lingxian Kong anlin.k...@gmail.commailto:anlin.k...@gmail.com
Reply-To:
Hi Chris, Jiang,
We are also looking into enchantment of basic PCI pass-through to provide
SR-IOV based networking.
In order to support automatic provisioning, it requires the awareness to what
virtual network to connect the requested SR-IOV device.
This should be considered by the scheduler
Hi Chris,
I note two of your comments --
When we worked on H release, we target for basic PCI support like
accelerator card or encryption card etc.
PU So I note that you are already solving the PCI pass through usecase somehow
? How ? If you have solved this already in terms of
Hi Chris,
I note two of your comments --
When we worked on H release, we target for basic PCI support like
accelerator card or encryption card etc.
PU So I note that you are already solving the PCI pass through usecase somehow
? How ? If you have solved this already in terms of
While specification of which networks a service VM has interfaces on indicates
which tenant(s) it serves, that by itself does not allow setting constraints on
which tenants that VM will accept to serve.
Setting such constraints could be taken a long way, almost like ACL. However,
I'm not
Harshad,
By service instance I referred to the logical entities that Neutron creates
(e.g. Neutron's router). I see a service VM as a (virtual) host where one or
several service instances can be placed.
The service VM (at least if managed through Nova) will belong to a tenant and
the service
Hi Edgar,
I'm also interested in a broadening of NAT capability in Neutron using the
evolving service framework.
Thanks,
Bob
From: Edgar Magana emag...@plumgrid.commailto:emag...@plumgrid.com
Reply-To: OpenStack Development Mailing List
This rises number of questions:
1. What about conditional dependencies? Like config3 depends on config1 AND
config2 OR config3.
2. How do I pass values between configs? For example config1 requires value
from user input and config2 needs an output value obtained from applying
config1
3. How
Robert Collins wrote:
I'm interested in serving on the OpenStack TC.
Confirmed.
# About me
I've been working on OpenStack for only a year now, since joining
Monty's merry gang of reprobateswink/ at HP. However I've been
entirely focused on networking and distributed systems since ~2000
Chris Behrens wrote:
Hi all,
I'd like to announce my candidacy for a seat on the OpenStack
Technical Committee.
Confirmed.
- General background -
I have over 15 years of experience designing and building distributed
systems. I am currently a Principal Engineer at Rackspace, where
I
Hi all,
Lakshminaraya Renganarayana lren...@us.ibm.com wrote on 10.10.2013
01:34:41:
From: Lakshminaraya Renganarayana lren...@us.ibm.com
To: Joshua Harlow harlo...@yahoo-inc.com,
Cc: OpenStack Development Mailing List
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Date: 10.10.2013 01:37
Subject: Re:
Alan Pevec wrote:
2013/10/10 Gary Kotton gkot...@vmware.com:
The problem seems to be with the boto python library. I am not really
familiar with this but I have seen this is the last – we may need to update
the requirements again to exclude a specific version.
Yeah, it's bad boto update
Hi ALL,
Recently, Jekins build failed for all nova submit. This is due to boto
changed method signature.
get_http_connection(host,is_secure) --- get_http_connection(host, port,
is_secure)
see
Hi,
I am dealing this with this – please see https://review.openstack.org/50904
Thanks
Gary
From: Chang Bo Guo guoc...@cn.ibm.commailto:guoc...@cn.ibm.com
Reply-To: OpenStack Development Mailing List
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.orgmailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Date: Thursday,
Trunk - https://review.openstack.org/50904
Stable/Grizzly - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/50905/
There is an alternative patch - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/50873/7
I recall seeing the same problem a few month ago and the bot version was
excluded - not sure why the calling code was not
On 10/10/2013 06:00 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Alan Pevec wrote:
2013/10/10 Gary Kotton gkot...@vmware.com:
The problem seems to be with the boto python library. I am not really
familiar with this but I have seen this is the last – we may need to update
the requirements again to exclude a
Hello everyone,
I have been recently working on a migration bug in nova (Bug #1233184).
I noticed that compute service remains available, even if a connection to
libvirt is broken.
I thought that it might be better to disable the service (using
conductor.manager.update_service()) and resume
Greetings,
I'd like to propose to change both ListOpt and DictOpt default values
to [] and {} respectively. These values are, IMHO, saner defaults than
None for this 2 options and behavior won't be altered - unles `is not
None` is being used.
Since I may be missing some history, I'd like to ask
On Thu, Oct 10 2013, Flavio Percoco wrote:
This is not terrible, TBH, but it doesn't feel right. I've made the
mistake to ignore the `default` keyword myself, although I know `[]`
is not the default option for `ListOpt`. As already said, I'd expect
`[]` to be the default, non-set value for
2013/10/10 Sean Dague s...@dague.net:
Hmph. So boto changed their connection function signatures to have a 3rd
argument, and put it second, and nothing has defaults.
So isn't that a boto bug? Not sure what their backward-compatibility
statement is but it is silly to break API just like that[1]
Won't it be simpler to keep service instance as one or more VMs, rather
than 1VM being many service instances?
Usually a appliance is collectively (all it's functions) providing a
service. Like firewall or load balancer. A appliance is packaged as VM.
It will be easier to manage
it will be easier
hi,
good point Balaji, the dst_port is the port on which ovs is listening
for vxlan packets, but I don't know what is the option in ovs-vsctl to
set the remote port of the vxlan unicast tunnel interface.
But it looks like a bug since you're right, tunnel_sync and
tunnel_update RPC messages should
Flavio,
sounds good to me.
-- dims
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 8:46 AM, Julien Danjou jul...@danjou.info wrote:
On Thu, Oct 10 2013, Flavio Percoco wrote:
This is not terrible, TBH, but it doesn't feel right. I've made the
mistake to ignore the `default` keyword myself, although I know `[]`
Agree,
I like what AWS had done. Have a concept of NAT instance. 90 % use cases
are solved by just specifying
Inside and outside networks for the NAT instance.
If one wants fancier NAT config they can always use NATaas API(s)
To configure this instance.
There is a blueprint for bringing Amazon
On 2013-10-10 07:40, Flavio Percoco wrote:
Greetings,
I'd like to propose to change both ListOpt and DictOpt default values
to [] and {} respectively. These values are, IMHO, saner defaults than
None for this 2 options and behavior won't be altered - unles `is not
None` is being used.
Since I
On 10/10/2013 09:45 AM, Ben Nemec wrote:
On 2013-10-10 07:40, Flavio Percoco wrote:
Greetings,
I'd like to propose to change both ListOpt and DictOpt default values
to [] and {} respectively. These values are, IMHO, saner defaults than
None for this 2 options and behavior won't be altered -
Hi Rohon,
Thanks for confirmation.
We will file a bug on this.
Regards,
Balaji.P
-Original Message-
From: Mathieu Rohon [mailto:mathieu.ro...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2013 6:43 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron]
If you deploy OpenStack with Neutron using Packstack and do something
like this...
packstack ... --neutron-ovs-bridge-interfaces=br-eth1:eth1
...packstack will happily add interface eth1 to br-eth1, but will
neither (a) ensure that it is up right now nor (b) ensure that it is
up after a
Nevertheless, it should be ok if you change the port on every agent,
and use the same port.
regards
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 4:04 PM, P Balaji-B37839 b37...@freescale.com wrote:
Hi Rohon,
Thanks for confirmation.
We will file a bug on this.
Regards,
Balaji.P
-Original Message-
Hi Flavio,
On Thu, 2013-10-10 at 14:40 +0200, Flavio Percoco wrote:
Greetings,
I'd like to propose to change both ListOpt and DictOpt default values
to [] and {} respectively. These values are, IMHO, saner defaults than
None for this 2 options and behavior won't be altered - unles `is not
On 10/10/2013 01:19 AM, Prashant Upadhyaya wrote:
Hi Chris,
I note two of your comments --
When we worked on H release, we target for basic PCI support
like accelerator card or encryption card etc.
PU So I note that you are already solving the PCI pass through
usecase somehow ? How ? If
Please consider our formal request for incubation status of the Manila project:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Manila_Overview
thanks!
-Ben Swartzlander
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
On 10/10/2013 04:42 AM, Gary Kotton wrote:
Trunk - https://review.openstack.org/50904
Stable/Grizzly - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/50905/
There is an alternative patch - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/50873/7
I recall seeing the same problem a few month ago and the bot version was
I'd like to announce my candidacy to the OpenStack Technical Committee.
As the Swift PTL, I've been involved in the TC for a while (and the PPB before
that and the POC before that). I've seen OpenStack grow the very beginning, and
I'm very proud to be a part of it.
As we all know, OpenStack
On 10/10/13 15:29 +0100, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
Hi Flavio,
On Thu, 2013-10-10 at 14:40 +0200, Flavio Percoco wrote:
Greetings,
I'd like to propose to change both ListOpt and DictOpt default values
to [] and {} respectively. These values are, IMHO, saner defaults than
None for this 2 options
Swartzlander, Ben wrote:
Please consider our formal request for incubation status of the Manila
project:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Manila_Overview
Note that with the TC elections under way, this request won't be
examined until the new TC is in place.
Regards,
--
Thierry Carrez (ttx)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
John Dickinson wrote:
I'd like to announce my candidacy to the OpenStack Technical
Committee.
Confirmed.
- --
Thierry Carrez (ttx)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird -
On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 11:33:35PM +,
Regnier, Greg J greg.j.regn...@intel.com wrote:
RE: vlan trunking support for network tunnels
Copying to dev mailing list.
- Greg
-Original Message-
From: Kyle Mestery (kmestery) [mailto:kmest...@cisco.com]
Sent: Thursday, October
Hello,
Test environment:
Neutron version: 2014.1.a61.gc7db907
Python version: v2.6 (we could replicate this issue with v2.7 as well)
OS: Oracle Linux 6.3
No of CPUs: 1
No of testr workers: 1
pip freeze: refer to bottom of email
pip index:
Hi all,
As the Havana release date is approaching fast, I'm sending this email to sum
up the situation for pending bugs and reviews related to the Hyper-V
integration in OpenStack.
In the past weeks we diligently marked bugs that are related to Havana features
with the havana-rc-potential
Greetings,
We already have more proposals for the Nova design summit track than
time slots. Please get your proposals in as soon as possible, and
ideally no later than 1 week from today - Thursday, October 17. At that
point we will be focusing on putting a schedule together in order to
have the
Tempest recently got some new tests for the nova diagnostics API [1] which
failed when I was running against the powervm driver since it doesn't
implement that API. I started looking at other drivers that did and found
that libvirt, vmware and xenapi at least had code for the get_diagnostics
Looks like this has been brought up a couple of times:
https://lists.launchpad.net/openstack/msg09138.html
https://lists.launchpad.net/openstack/msg08555.html
But they seem to kind of end up in the same place I already am - it seems
to be an open-ended API that is hypervisor-specific.
Possibly but not necessarily. Some VMs have a large footprint, have
multi-service capability and physical devices with capabilities sufficient for
tenant isolation are not that rare (especially if tenants can only indirectly
control them through a cloud service API).
My point is that if we
Dear Stackers, I would like to put my candidacy for a position on the
OpenStack Technical Committee. I have been an active OpenStack contributor
for over a year, my work mostly concentrated around improving existing
OpenStack code (unifying common parts of OpenStack projects and putting
them to
Confirmed.
On 10/10/2013 10:14 PM, Boris Pavlovic wrote:
Dear Stackers, I would like to put my candidacy for a position on the
OpenStack Technical Committee. I have been an active OpenStack
contributor for over a year, my work mostly concentrated around
improving existing OpenStack code
That is, we're now deploying a trunk KVM based OpenStack using heat +
nova baremetal on a continuous basis into the test rack we have, it's
been running stably for 12 hours or so. Yay!
I think we should do a retrospective
(http://finding-marbles.com/retr-o-mat/what-is-a-retrospective/) at
the
We're trying to clean up the tempest blueprints prior to the icehouse
summit to ensure that what's in https://blueprints.launchpad.net/tempest
has some reflection on reality.
There are a large number in Delivery: Unknown states (most in the New
status). If these are really things people are
Greetings all,
I'm looking at how to expand the ability of our CM instance to consume
notifications and have a quick question about the configuration and flow...
For the notifications central agent , we rely on the services (i.e. glance,
cinder) to drop messages on the same messaging host as
Alex, agree with your comments. I think we need to think of both 1.
and 2. as the eventual outcome and the destination. IF we decide to
improve upon scheduling/polices at the heat level, that should be a
very nice and independent endeavor and we can all learn from it. I
dont think we can design
Based on the discussion with Russell and Dan Smith in the nova meeting
today, here are some of my notes from the meeting that can continue the
discussion. These are all pretty rough at the moment so please bear with
me, this is more to just get the ball rolling on ideas.
Notes on powervm CI:
The use cases defined (so far) cover these cases:
Single service instance in a single service VM (agree this
avoids complexity pointed out by Harshad)
Multiple service instances on a single service VM (provides
flexibility, extensibility)
Not explicitly covered
On 10/10/13 11:59 +0400, Stan Lagun wrote:
This rises number of questions:
1. What about conditional dependencies? Like config3 depends on config1 AND
config2 OR config3.
We have the AND, but not an OR. To depend on two resources you just
have 2 references to the 2 resources.
2. How do I
Excerpts from Angus Salkeld's message of 2013-10-10 15:27:48 -0700:
On 10/10/13 11:59 +0400, Stan Lagun wrote:
This rises number of questions:
1. What about conditional dependencies? Like config3 depends on config1 AND
config2 OR config3.
We have the AND, but not an OR. To depend on two
On Oct 10, 2013, at 23:50 , Russell Bryant
rbry...@redhat.commailto:rbry...@redhat.com
wrote:
On 10/10/2013 02:20 PM, Alessandro Pilotti wrote:
Hi all,
As the Havana release date is approaching fast, I'm sending this email
to sum up the situation for pending bugs and reviews related to the
On 10/10/2013 06:16 PM, Neal, Phil wrote:
Greetings all, I'm looking at how to expand the ability of our CM
instance to consume notifications and have a quick question about
the configuration and flow...
For the notifications central agent , we rely on the services (i.e.
glance, cinder)
Here are the blueprints (mentioned by Harshad below) to add complete AWS
VPC compatibility in Openstack. AWS EC2 compatibility already exists in
Openstack.
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/ipam-extensions-for-neutron
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 1:50 PM, Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com wrote:
Please understand that I only want to help here. Perhaps a good way for
you to get more review attention is get more karma in the dev community
by helping review other patches. It looks like you don't really review
Getting integration testing hooked up for the hyper-v driver with tempest
should go a long way here which is a good reason to have it. As has been
mentioned, there is a core team of people that understand the internals of
the hyper-v driver and the subtleties of when it won't work, and only
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 11:20 AM, Alessandro Pilotti
apilo...@cloudbasesolutions.com wrote:
Hi all,
As the Havana release date is approaching fast, I'm sending this email
to sum up the situation for pending bugs and reviews related to the Hyper-V
integration in OpenStack.
In the past
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 6:57 PM, Matt Riedemann mrie...@us.ibm.com wrote:
Getting integration testing hooked up for the hyper-v driver with tempest
should go a long way here which is a good reason to have it. As has been
mentioned, there is a core team of people that understand the internals
Dan Smith d...@danplanet.com wrote on 10/10/2013 08:26:14 PM:
From: Dan Smith d...@danplanet.com
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org,
Date: 10/10/2013 08:31 PM
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][powervm] my notes from the
meeting on powervm CI
4.
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 5:43 PM, Tim Smith tsm...@gridcentric.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 1:50 PM, Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.comwrote:
Please understand that I only want to help here. Perhaps a good way for
you to get more review attention is get more karma in the dev community
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 7:28 PM, Matt Riedemann mrie...@us.ibm.com wrote:
Dan Smith d...@danplanet.com wrote on 10/10/2013 08:26:14 PM:
From: Dan Smith d...@danplanet.com
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org,
Date: 10/10/2013 08:31 PM
Subject:
Hi there,
I've been reviewing this change which is currently proposed for master
and I think it needs to be considered for the next Havana RC.
Change I3e080c30: Fix resource length in project_user_quotas table
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/47299/
I'm new to the process around these kinds
I installed ceilometer, according to
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_OpenStack_ceilometer_install;.
It appears an error
HTTPUnauthorized at /project/instances/
in dashboard after using admin user to create a user . I think
ceilometer goes wrong . Could someone give me some advice ?
Dear Openstack Dev Gurus,
I am trying to understand the python novaclient code. Can someone please
point me to where in openstackcomputeshell class in shell.py does the
actual function or class related to an argument gets called?
Thanks a bunch
___
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 04:55:51PM -0500, Matt Riedemann wrote:
Based on the discussion with Russell and Dan Smith in the nova meeting
today, here are some of my notes from the meeting that can continue the
discussion. These are all pretty rough at the moment so please bear with
me, this
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 07:39:37PM -0700, Joe Gordon wrote:
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 7:28 PM, Matt Riedemann mrie...@us.ibm.com wrote:
4. What is the max amount of time for us to report test results? Dan
didn't seem to think 48 hours would fly. :)
Honestly, I think that 12 hours
A L la6...@gmail.com writes:
Dear Openstack Dev Gurus,
I am trying to understand the python novaclient code. Can someone please
point me to where in openstackcomputeshell class in shell.py does the
actual function or class related to an argument gets called?
This review [1] is something I
75 matches
Mail list logo
