[openstack-dev] [oslo][glance][cinder][keystone][requirements] blocking oslo.messaging 9.0.0

2018-10-08 Thread Matthew Thode
several projects have had problems with the new release, some have ways of working around it, and some do not. I'm sending this just to raise the issue and allow a place to discuss solutions. Currently there is a review proposed to blacklist 9.0.0, but if this is going to still be an issue

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] assigning new liaisons to projects

2018-10-08 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
On Mon, 08 Oct 2018 23:27:06 +0900 Doug Hellmann wrote > TC members, > > Since we are starting a new term, and have several new members, we need > to decide how we want to rotate the liaisons attached to each our > project teams, SIGs, and working groups [1]. > > Last

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] assigning new liaisons to projects

2018-10-08 Thread Julia Kreger
On Mon, Oct 8, 2018 at 8:27 AM Doug Hellmann wrote: > TC members, > > Since we are starting a new term, and have several new members, we need > to decide how we want to rotate the liaisons attached to each our > project teams, SIGs, and working groups [1]. > > Last term we went through a period

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Stepping down from Release Management team

2018-10-08 Thread Doug Hellmann
Anne Bertucio writes: > Hi all, > > I have had a fantastic time getting to work on the Release Management > team and getting to know you all through the release marketing work, > however, it is time for me to step down from my role on the Release > Management team as I am moving on from my role

Re: [openstack-dev] [goals][python3][heat][manila][qinling][zaqar][magnum][keystone][congress] switching python package jobs

2018-10-08 Thread Doug Hellmann
Doug Hellmann writes: > Doug Hellmann writes: > >> Doug Hellmann writes: >> >>> Doug Hellmann writes: >> >>> I have filed requests with the maintainers of PyPI to claim the names >>> "keystone" and "congress". That may take some time. Please let me know >>> if you're willing to simply use

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Zuul job backlog

2018-10-08 Thread Doug Hellmann
Abhishek Kekane writes: > Hi Doug, > > Should I use something like SimpleHttpServer to upload a file and download > the same, or there are other efficient ways to handle it, > Kindly let me know if you are having any suggestions for the same. Sure, that would work, especially if your tests are

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] add service discovery, proxysql, vault, fabio and FQDN endpoints

2018-10-08 Thread Jay Pipes
On 10/08/2018 06:14 AM, Florian Engelmann wrote: 3. HAProxy is not capable to handle "read/write" split with Galera. I would like to introduce ProxySQL to be able to scale Galera. Why not send all read and all write traffic to a single haproxy endpoint and just have haproxy spread all traffic

Re: [openstack-dev] [goals][upgrade-checkers] Oslo library status

2018-10-08 Thread Slawomir Kaplonski
Ok. Thx for info Matt. My patch is now marked as WIP and I will wait for release of this lib then. > Wiadomość napisana przez Matt Riedemann w dniu > 08.10.2018, o godz. 18:08: > > On 10/7/2018 4:10 AM, Slawomir Kaplonski wrote: >> I start working on „neutron-status upgrade check” tool with

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] assigning new liaisons to projects

2018-10-08 Thread Sean McGinnis
On Mon, Oct 08, 2018 at 10:27:06AM -0400, Doug Hellmann wrote: > TC members, > > Since we are starting a new term, and have several new members, we need > to decide how we want to rotate the liaisons attached to each our > project teams, SIGs, and working groups [1]. > > Last term we went

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Stepping down from Release Management team

2018-10-08 Thread Melvin Hillsman
Nooo! lol Sorry to see you go but do stay in touch and I will do the same. Cheers to going on and continuing to do great things Anne; excited to see what you are up to in the coming days. From: Anne Bertucio Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" Date:

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable][octavia] Backport patch adding new configuration options

2018-10-08 Thread Assaf Muller
On Mon, Oct 8, 2018 at 12:34 PM Matt Riedemann wrote: > > On 10/8/2018 11:05 AM, Carlos Goncalves wrote: > > The Octavia team merged a patch in master [1] that fixed an issue where > > load balancers could be deleted whenever queue_event_streamer driver is > > enabled and RabbitMQ goes down [2].

[openstack-dev] [all] Stepping down from Release Management team

2018-10-08 Thread Anne Bertucio
Hi all, I have had a fantastic time getting to work on the Release Management team and getting to know you all through the release marketing work, however, it is time for me to step down from my role on the Release Management team as I am moving on from my role at the Foundation and will no

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable][octavia] Backport patch adding new configuration options

2018-10-08 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 10/8/2018 11:05 AM, Carlos Goncalves wrote: The Octavia team merged a patch in master [1] that fixed an issue where load balancers could be deleted whenever queue_event_streamer driver is enabled and RabbitMQ goes down [2]. As this is a critical bug, we would like to backport as much back

Re: [openstack-dev] [goals][upgrade-checkers] Oslo library status

2018-10-08 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 10/7/2018 4:10 AM, Slawomir Kaplonski wrote: I start working on „neutron-status upgrade check” tool with noop operation for now. Patch is in [1] I started using this new oslo_upgradecheck library in version 0.0.1.dev15 which is available on pypi.org but I see that in master there are some

[openstack-dev] [stable][octavia] Backport patch adding new configuration options

2018-10-08 Thread Carlos Goncalves
Stable team, The Octavia team merged a patch in master [1] that fixed an issue where load balancers could be deleted whenever queue_event_streamer driver is enabled and RabbitMQ goes down [2]. As this is a critical bug, we would like to backport as much back as possible. The question is whether

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] assigning new liaisons to projects

2018-10-08 Thread Lance Bragstad
On Mon, Oct 8, 2018 at 9:27 AM Doug Hellmann wrote: > TC members, > > Since we are starting a new term, and have several new members, we need > to decide how we want to rotate the liaisons attached to each our > project teams, SIGs, and working groups [1]. > > Last term we went through a period

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][cinder][glance][osc][sdk] Image Encryption for OpenStack (proposal)

2018-10-08 Thread Markus Hentsch
Dear OpenStack developers, as you suggested, we have written individual specs for Nova [1] and Cinder [2] so far and will write another spec for Glance soon. We'd appreciate any feedback and reviews on the specs :) Thank you in advance, Markus Hentsch [1]

[openstack-dev] [goals][python3][telemetry][barbican][monasca][neutron] having a gerrit admin approve the remaining zuul job settings import patches

2018-10-08 Thread Doug Hellmann
We have about 17 remaining patches to import zuul job settings into a few repositories. Those are mostly in stable branches and the jobs are failing in ways that may take us a long time to fix. Rather than waiting for those, Andreas and I are proposing that we have someone from the infra team

[openstack-dev] [tc] Technical Committee status update for 8 October 2018

2018-10-08 Thread Doug Hellmann
This is the weekly summary of work being done by the Technical Committee members. The full list of active items is managed in the wiki: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Technical_Committee_Tracker We also track TC objectives for the cycle using StoryBoard at:

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] Tenks

2018-10-08 Thread Jim Rollenhagen
On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 8:59 AM Mark Goddard wrote: > Hi, > > In the most recent Ironic meeting we discussed [1] tenks, and the > possibility of adding the project under Ironic governance. We agreed to > move the discussion to the mailing list. I'll introduce the project here > and give everyone

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] bringing back formal TC meetings

2018-10-08 Thread Lance Bragstad
On Mon, Oct 8, 2018 at 9:08 AM Doug Hellmann wrote: > Based on the conversation in the other branch of this thread, I have > filed [1] to start monthly meetings on November 1 at 1400 UTC. It may > take a while before that actually shows up on the calendar, because it > required adding a feature

[openstack-dev] [tc] assigning new liaisons to projects

2018-10-08 Thread Doug Hellmann
TC members, Since we are starting a new term, and have several new members, we need to decide how we want to rotate the liaisons attached to each our project teams, SIGs, and working groups [1]. Last term we went through a period of volunteer sign-up and then I randomly assigned folks to slots

[openstack-dev] [tc] planned absence

2018-10-08 Thread Doug Hellmann
TC members, I have some PTO planned, so I will be away from 13 Oct - 28 Oct. I approved the patch appointing Mohammed as vice chair this morning, so he will be serving as chair during that time. Doug __ OpenStack

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] bringing back formal TC meetings

2018-10-08 Thread Doug Hellmann
Based on the conversation in the other branch of this thread, I have filed [1] to start monthly meetings on November 1 at 1400 UTC. It may take a while before that actually shows up on the calendar, because it required adding a feature to yaml2ical [2]. We talked about using email to add items to

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] bringing back formal TC meetings

2018-10-08 Thread Sean McGinnis
> > > > I think we can definitely manage the agenda to minimize the number of > > complex discussions. If that proves to be too hard, I wouldn't mind > > meeting more often, but there does seem to be a lot of support for > > preferring other venues for those conversations. > > > > > +1 I think

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] [nova] Do we need a "force" parameter in cinder "re-image" API?

2018-10-08 Thread Sean McGinnis
On Mon, Oct 08, 2018 at 03:09:36PM +0800, Yikun Jiang wrote: > In Denver, we agree to add a new "re-image" API in cinder to support upport > volume-backed server rebuild with a new image. > > An initial blueprint has been drafted in [3], welcome to review it, thanks. > : ) > > [snip] > > The

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] [all] Consistent policy names

2018-10-08 Thread Lance Bragstad
On Mon, Oct 1, 2018 at 8:13 AM Ghanshyam Mann wrote: > On Sat, 29 Sep 2018 03:54:01 +0900 Lance Bragstad < > lbrags...@gmail.com> wrote > > > > On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 1:03 PM Harry Rybacki > wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 1:57 PM Morgan Fainberg > > wrote: > > > > > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Rocky RC time regression analysis

2018-10-08 Thread Eric Fried
Mel- I don't have much of anything useful to add here, but wanted to say thanks for this thorough analysis. It must have taken a lot of time and work. Musings inline. On 10/05/2018 06:59 PM, melanie witt wrote: > Hey everyone, > > During our Rocky retrospective discussion at the PTG [1], we

Re: [openstack-dev] [Monasca] [monasca-Agent] Monasca agent problem

2018-10-08 Thread Bedyk, Witold
Hi Amal, I guess, the mailing list doesn’t accept attachments. Could you please check if you’re using the right project? Monasca is multi-tenant and stores all the measurements and alarm definitions per project. If alarm definition is created, let’s say for project ‘admin’ and the agent is

[openstack-dev] [manila] Stein mid-cycle and bug smash dates

2018-10-08 Thread Tom Barron
In a recent weekly manila community meeting [1] we tentatively agreed to have a virtual mid-cycle Wednesday and Thursday 16-17 January 2019. This would be the week after the Stein-2 miletone and a month before Manila Feature proposal Freeze. Also, given the success of the China-based

[openstack-dev] [kolla] add service discovery, proxysql, vault, fabio and FQDN endpoints

2018-10-08 Thread Florian Engelmann
Hi, I would like to start a discussion about some changes and additions I would like to see in in kolla and kolla-ansible. 1. Keepalived is a problem in layer3 spine leaf networks as any floating IP can only exist in one leaf (and VRRP is a problem in layer3). I would like to use consul and

[openstack-dev] [Monasca] [monasca-Agent] Monasca agent problem

2018-10-08 Thread amal kammoun
Hello, I have an issue with the monasca Agent. In fact, I installed monasca with Openstack using devstack. I want to minitor now the instances deployed using Openstack. For that I installed on each instance the monasca agent with the following link:

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Zuul job backlog

2018-10-08 Thread Abhishek Kekane
Hi Doug, Should I use something like SimpleHttpServer to upload a file and download the same, or there are other efficient ways to handle it, Kindly let me know if you are having any suggestions for the same. Thanks & Best Regards, Abhishek Kekane On Fri, Oct 5, 2018 at 4:57 PM Doug Hellmann

Re: [openstack-dev] [api] Open API 3.0 for OpenStack API

2018-10-08 Thread Gilles Dubreuil
On 05/10/18 21:54, Jim Rollenhagen wrote: GraphQL has introspection features that allow clients to pull the schema (types, queries, mutations, etc): https://graphql.org/learn/introspection/ That said, it seems like using this in a client like OpenStackSDK would get messy quickly. Instead of

[openstack-dev] [vitrage] vitrage virtual PTG

2018-10-08 Thread Ifat Afek
Hi, We will hold the vitrage virtual PTG on Wednesday-Thursday this week, October 10-11th. The agenda is listed in the etherpad[1], and you can still add new topics for discussion. We will skip the regular IRC meeting this week. [1] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/vitrage-stein-ptg Thanks,

[openstack-dev] [cinder] [nova] Do we need a "force" parameter in cinder "re-image" API?

2018-10-08 Thread Yikun Jiang
In Denver, we agree to add a new "re-image" API in cinder to support upport volume-backed server rebuild with a new image. An initial blueprint has been drafted in [3], welcome to review it, thanks. : ) The API is very simple, something like: URL: POST