Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] reducing our upstream CI footprint

On Wed, 31 Oct 2018 at 17:22, Alex Schultz wrote: > > Hey everyone, > > Based on previous emails around this[0][1], I have proposed a possible > reducing in our usage by switching the scenario001--011 jobs to > non-voting and removing them from the gate[2]. This will reduce the > likelihood of

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] status of the zuulv3 job migration

On Fri, 21 Sep 2018 at 11:16, Derek Higgins wrote: > Just quick summary of the status and looking for some input about the > experimental jobs > > 15 jobs are now done, with another 2 ready for reviewing. This leaves 6 > jobs > 1 x multinode job >I've yet to finished p

[openstack-dev] [ironic] status of the zuulv3 job migration

Just quick summary of the status and looking for some input about the experimental jobs 15 jobs are now done, with another 2 ready for reviewing. This leaves 6 jobs 1 x multinode job I've yet to finished porting this one 2 x grenade jobs Last time I looked grenade jobs couldn't yet be

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo]Testing ironic in the overcloud

On 23 February 2018 at 14:48, Derek Higgins wrote: > > > On 1 February 2018 at 16:18, Emilien Macchi wrote: > >> On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 8:05 AM, Derek Higgins wrote: >> [...] >> >>> o Should I create a new tempest test for baremetal as some of

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Ironic Inspector in the overcloud

On 18 April 2018 at 17:12, Derek Higgins <der...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > On 18 April 2018 at 14:22, Bogdan Dobrelya <bdobr...@redhat.com> wrote: > >> On 4/18/18 12:07 PM, Derek Higgins wrote: >> >>> Hi All, >>> >>> I've been testing

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Ironic Inspector in the overcloud

On 18 April 2018 at 14:22, Bogdan Dobrelya <bdobr...@redhat.com> wrote: > On 4/18/18 12:07 PM, Derek Higgins wrote: > >> Hi All, >> >> I've been testing the ironic inspector containerised service in the >> overcloud, the service essentially works but there

[openstack-dev] [tripleo] Ironic Inspector in the overcloud

Hi All, I've been testing the ironic inspector containerised service in the overcloud, the service essentially works but there is a couple of hurdles to tackle to set it up, the first of these is how to get the IPA kernel and ramdisk where they need to be. These need to be be present in the

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo]Testing ironic in the overcloud

On 1 February 2018 at 16:18, Emilien Macchi <emil...@redhat.com> wrote: > On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 8:05 AM, Derek Higgins <der...@redhat.com> wrote: > [...] > >> o Should I create a new tempest test for baremetal as some of the >>>> networking stuff is differ

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo]Testing ironic in the overcloud

On 1 February 2018 at 15:36, Emilien Macchi <emil...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 6:35 AM, Derek Higgins <der...@redhat.com> wrote: > >> Hi All, >>I've been working on a set of patches as a WIP to test ironic in the >> overcloud[1]

[openstack-dev] [tripleo]Testing ironic in the overcloud

Hi All, I've been working on a set of patches as a WIP to test ironic in the overcloud[1], the approach I've started with is to add ironic into the overcloud controller in scenario004. Also to run a script on the controller (as a NodeExtraConfigPost) that sets up a VM with vbmc that can then be

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Tis the season...for a cloud reboot

On 19 December 2017 at 22:23, Brian Haley wrote: > On 12/19/2017 04:00 PM, Ben Nemec wrote: > >> >> >> On 12/19/2017 02:43 PM, Brian Haley wrote: >> >>> On 12/19/2017 11:53 AM, Ben Nemec wrote: >>> The reboot is done (mostly...see below). On 12/18/2017 05:11

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] Kernel parameters needed to boot from iscsi

On 30 October 2017 at 15:16, Julia Kreger wrote: ... >>> When I tried it I got this >>> [ 370.704896] dracut-initqueue[387]: Warning: iscistart: Could not >>> get list of targets from firmware. >>> >>> perhaps we could alter iscistart to not complain if there are no

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] Kernel parameters needed to boot from iscsi

On 25 October 2017 at 13:03, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: > (ooops, I somehow missed this email. sorry!) > > Hi Yolanda, > > On 10/16/2017 11:06 AM, Yolanda Robla Mota wrote: >> >> Hi >> Recently i've been helping some customers in the boot from ISCSI feature. >> So far everything

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] scenario006 conflict

On 19 July 2017 at 17:02, Derek Higgins <der...@redhat.com> wrote: > On 17 July 2017 at 15:56, Derek Higgins <der...@redhat.com> wrote: >> On 17 July 2017 at 15:37, Emilien Macchi <emil...@redhat.com> wrote: >>> On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 6:01 AM, Emili

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] scenario006 conflict

On 17 July 2017 at 15:56, Derek Higgins <der...@redhat.com> wrote: > On 17 July 2017 at 15:37, Emilien Macchi <emil...@redhat.com> wrote: >> On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 6:01 AM, Emilien Macchi <emil...@redhat.com> wrote: >>> On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 1:55 AM, Der

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] scenario006 conflict

On 17 July 2017 at 15:37, Emilien Macchi <emil...@redhat.com> wrote: > On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 6:01 AM, Emilien Macchi <emil...@redhat.com> wrote: >> On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 1:55 AM, Derek Higgins <der...@redhat.com> wrote: >>> On 12 July 2017 at 22:33, Emili

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] scenario006 conflict

On 12 July 2017 at 22:33, Emilien Macchi wrote: > On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 2:23 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote: > [...] >> Derek, it seems like you want to deploy Ironic on scenario006 >> (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/474802). I was wondering how it >> would

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] scenario006 conflict

On 12 July 2017 at 22:23, Emilien Macchi wrote: > Hey folks, > > Derek, it seems like you want to deploy Ironic on scenario006 > (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/474802). I was wondering how it > would work with multinode jobs. The idea was that we would create a libvirt

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] rh1 issues post-mortem

On 22 March 2017 at 22:36, Ben Nemec wrote: > Hi all (owl?), > > You may have missed it in all the ci excitement the past couple of days, but > we had a partial outage of rh1 last night. It turns out the OVS port issue > Derek discussed in >

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] DB cleanup cron jobs added to rh1

On 16 December 2016 at 21:40, Ben Nemec wrote: > Just a heads up for everyone, I've added some DB cleanup jobs to rh1 which > will hopefully prevent the performance degradations over time that we've > been seeing in that environment. Specifically, the crontab now looks

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Setting up to 3rd party CI OVB jobs

On 7 October 2016 at 14:03, Paul Belanger wrote: > Greetings, > > I wanted to propose a work item, that I am happy to spearhead, about setting > up > a 3rd party CI system for tripleo project. The work I am proposing, wouldn't > actually affect anything today about

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] tripleo-test-cloud-rh1 and bastion host

On 9 September 2016 at 16:38, Paul Belanger wrote: > Greetings, > > I would like to start the discussions around the removal of the bastion host > that sits in front of tripleo-test-cloud-rh1. It is my understanding, all > traffic from tripleo-test-cloud-rh1 flows through

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO][CI] Need more undercloud resources

On 25 August 2016 at 02:56, Paul Belanger wrote: > On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 02:11:32PM -0400, James Slagle wrote: >> The latest recurring problem that is failing a lot of the nonha ssl >> jobs in tripleo-ci is: >> >> https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1616144 >>

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO][CI] Need more undercloud resources

On 24 August 2016 at 19:11, James Slagle wrote: > The latest recurring problem that is failing a lot of the nonha ssl > jobs in tripleo-ci is: > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1616144 > tripleo-ci: nonha jobs failing with Unable to establish connection to >

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO][CI] Memory shortage in HA jobs, please increase it

On 19 August 2016 at 11:08, Giulio Fidente <gfide...@redhat.com> wrote: > On 08/19/2016 11:41 AM, Derek Higgins wrote: >> >> On 19 August 2016 at 00:07, Sagi Shnaidman <sshna...@redhat.com> wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> we have

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO][CI] Memory shortage in HA jobs, please increase it

On 19 August 2016 at 00:07, Sagi Shnaidman wrote: > Hi, > > we have a problem again with not enough memory in HA jobs, all of them > constantly fails in CI: http://status-tripleoci.rhcloud.com/ Have we any idea why we need more memory all of a sudden? For months the

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] tripleo-test-cloud-rh2 local mirror server

On 27 July 2016 at 17:52, Paul Belanger <pabelan...@redhat.com> wrote: > On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 02:54:00PM +0100, Derek Higgins wrote: >> On 21 July 2016 at 23:04, Paul Belanger <pabelan...@redhat.com> wrote: >> > Greetings, >> > >> > I writ

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] tripleo-test-cloud-rh2 local mirror server

On 21 July 2016 at 23:04, Paul Belanger wrote: > Greetings, > > I write today to see how I can remove this server from > tripleo-test-cloud-rh2. I > have an open patch[1] currently to migrate tripleo-ci to use our AFS mirrors > for > centos and epel. However, I'm still

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Delorean fail blocks CI for stable branches

Trying to catch up here and summarizing as a top post so as I see it we have a number of problems that all need sorting out Regardless of the branch being built, tripleo-ci is currently building it with the packaging for master - in most cases this has worked out ok because most projects don't

[openstack-dev] [tripleo][infra] RH2 is up and running

Hi All, Yesterday the final patch merged to run CI jobs on RH2, and last night we merged the patch to tripleo-ci to support RH2 jobs. So we now have a new job (gate-tripleo-ci-centos-7-ovb-ha) running on all tripleo patch reviews. This job is running pacemaker HA with a 3 node controller and a

[openstack-dev] [TripleO] Delopment environment census refresh

Hi All, A while back we populated a etherpad[1] with details of our individual development environments, the idea here was that we can point newcomers to this page to give them an idea of what hard ware its possible to deploy triple on and what tools we use drive it. Its been just over 3

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Proposal for a new tool: dlrn-repo

On 13 June 2016 at 21:29, Ben Nemec wrote: > So our documented repo setup steps are three curls, a sed, and a > multi-line bash command. And the best part? That's not even what we > test. The commands we actually use in tripleo.sh --repo-setup consist > of the

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Austin summit - session recap/summary

On 19 May 2016 5:38 pm, "Paul Belanger" <pabelan...@redhat.com> wrote: > > On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 03:50:15PM +0100, Derek Higgins wrote: > > On 18 May 2016 at 13:34, Paul Belanger <pabelan...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 12:22:55PM

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Austin summit - session recap/summary

On 18 May 2016 at 13:34, Paul Belanger <pabelan...@redhat.com> wrote: > On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 12:22:55PM +0100, Derek Higgins wrote: >> On 6 May 2016 at 14:18, Paul Belanger <pabelan...@redhat.com> wrote: >> > On Tue, May 03, 2016 at 05:34:55PM +0100, St

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Austin summit - session recap/summary

On 6 May 2016 at 14:18, Paul Belanger wrote: > On Tue, May 03, 2016 at 05:34:55PM +0100, Steven Hardy wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> Some folks have requested a summary of our summit sessions, as has been >> provided for some other projects. >> >> I'll probably go into more detail

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Reason for installing devstack in CI pipeline

On 16 May 2016 at 18:16, Paul Belanger wrote: > Greetings, > > Over the last few weeks I've been head deep into understanding the TripleO CI > pipeline. For the most part, I am happy that we have merged centos-7 DIB > support and I'm working to migrate the jobs to it. > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO][infra] HW upgrade for tripleo CI

On 11 May 2016 at 10:24, Derek Higgins <der...@redhat.com> wrote: > Hi All, > I'll be taking down the tripleo cloud today for the hardware > upgrade, The cloud will be take down at about 1PM UTC and I'll start > bringing it back up once dcops have finished installing the n

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO][infra] HW upgrade for tripleo CI

2016 at 15:36, Derek Higgins <der...@redhat.com> wrote: > Hi All, >the long awaited RAM and SSD's have arrived for the tripleo rack, > I'd like to schedule a time next week to do the install which will > involve and outage window. We could attempt to do it node by node but >

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO][infra] HW upgrade for tripleo CI

On 6 May 2016 at 15:57, Ben Nemec <openst...@nemebean.com> wrote: > \o/ > > On 05/06/2016 09:36 AM, Derek Higgins wrote: >> Hi All, >>the long awaited RAM and SSD's have arrived for the tripleo rack, >> I'd like to schedule a time next week to do the install

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO][infra] HW upgrade for tripleo CI

On 6 May 2016 at 17:50, James Slagle <james.sla...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 10:36 AM, Derek Higgins <der...@redhat.com> wrote: >> Hi All, >>the long awaited RAM and SSD's have arrived for the tripleo rack, >> I'd like to schedule a time

[openstack-dev] [TripleO][infra] HW upgrade for tripleo CI

Hi All, the long awaited RAM and SSD's have arrived for the tripleo rack, I'd like to schedule a time next week to do the install which will involve and outage window. We could attempt to do it node by node but the controller needs to come down at some stage anyways and doing other nodes groups

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO][CI] Ability to reproduce failures

On 13 April 2016 at 09:58, Steven Hardy wrote: > On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 11:08:28PM +0200, Gabriele Cerami wrote: >> On Fri, 2016-04-08 at 16:18 +0100, Steven Hardy wrote: >> >> > Note we're not using devtest at all anymore, the developer script >> > many >> > folks use is

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO][CI] Ability to reproduce failures

On 7 April 2016 at 22:03, Gabriele Cerami wrote: > Hi, > > I'm trying to find an entry point to join the effort in TripleO CI. Hi Gabriele, welcome aboard > I studied the infrastructure and the scripts, but there's still something I'm > missing. > The last step of studying

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] becoming third party CI

On 17 March 2016 at 16:59, Ben Nemec wrote: > On 03/10/2016 05:24 PM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: >> On 2016-03-10 16:09:44 -0500 (-0500), Dan Prince wrote: >>> This seems to be the week people want to pile it on TripleO. Talking >>> about upstream is great but I suppose I'd

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] propose trown for core

On 20 March 2016 at 18:32, Dan Prince wrote: > I'd like to propose that we add John Trowbridge to the TripleO core > review team. John has become one of the goto guys in helping to chase > down upstream trunk chasing issues. He has contributed a lot to helping > keep general

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] propose EmilienM for core

On 20 March 2016 at 18:22, Dan Prince wrote: > I'd like to propose that we add Emilien Macchi to the TripleO core > review team. Emilien has been getting more involved with TripleO during > this last release. In addition to help with various Puppet things he > also has

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] rabbitmq / ipv6 issue

On 16 March 2016 at 02:41, Emilien Macchi wrote: > I did some testing again and I'm still running in curl issues: > http://paste.openstack.org/show/BU7UY0mUrxoMUGDhXgWs/ > > I'll continue investigation tomorrow. btw, tripleo-ci seems to be doing reasonably well this morning,

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] core cleanup

On 14 March 2016 at 14:26, Dan Prince wrote: > Looking at the stats for the last 180 days I'd like to propose we > cleanup TripleO core a bit: > > http://russellbryant.net/openstack-stats/tripleo-reviewers-180.txt > > There are a few reviewers with low numbers of reviews (just

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] propose ejuaso for core

On 14 March 2016 at 14:38, Dan Prince wrote: > http://russellbryant.net/openstack-stats/tripleo-reviewers-180.txt > > Our top reviewer over the last half a year ejuaso (goes by Ozz for > Osorio or jaosorior on IRC). His reviews seem consistent, he > consistently attends the

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] CI jobs failures

On 9 March 2016 at 07:08, Richard Su <r...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > On 03/08/2016 09:58 AM, Derek Higgins wrote: >> >> On 7 March 2016 at 18:22, Ben Nemec <openst...@nemebean.com> wrote: >>> >>> On 03/07/2016 11:33 AM, Derek Higgins wrote: >

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] CI jobs failures

On 7 March 2016 at 18:22, Ben Nemec <openst...@nemebean.com> wrote: > On 03/07/2016 11:33 AM, Derek Higgins wrote: >> On 7 March 2016 at 15:24, Derek Higgins <der...@redhat.com> wrote: >>> On 6 March 2016 at 16:58, James Slagle <james.sla...@gmail.com> wrote:

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] CI jobs failures

On 7 March 2016 at 12:11, John Trowbridge wrote: > > > On 03/06/2016 11:58 AM, James Slagle wrote: >> On Sat, Mar 5, 2016 at 11:15 AM, Emilien Macchi wrote: >>> I'm kind of hijacking Dan's e-mail but I would like to propose some >>> technical improvements to

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] CI jobs failures

On 7 March 2016 at 15:24, Derek Higgins <der...@redhat.com> wrote: > On 6 March 2016 at 16:58, James Slagle <james.sla...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Sat, Mar 5, 2016 at 11:15 AM, Emilien Macchi <emil...@redhat.com> wrote: >>> I'm kind of hijacking Dan's e-m

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] CI jobs failures

On 6 March 2016 at 16:58, James Slagle wrote: > On Sat, Mar 5, 2016 at 11:15 AM, Emilien Macchi wrote: >> I'm kind of hijacking Dan's e-mail but I would like to propose some >> technical improvements to stop having so much CI failures. >> >> >> 1/ Stop

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Stable branch policy for Mitaka

On 10/02/16 18:05, James Slagle wrote: On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 4:57 PM, Steven Hardy > wrote: Hi all, We discussed this in our meeting[1] this week, and agreed a ML discussion to gain consensus and give folks visibility of the

[openstack-dev] [TripleO] spec-lite process for tripleo

Hi All, We briefly discussed feature tracking in this weeks tripleo meeting. I would like to provide a way for downstream consumers (and ourselves) to track new features as they get implemented. The main things that came out of the discussion is that people liked the spec-lite process that

[openstack-dev] [TripleO] changes in irc alerts

Hi All, For the last few months we've been alerting the #tripleo irc channel when a card is open on the tripleo trello org, in the urgent list. When used I think it served a good purpose to alert people to the fact that deploying master is currently broken, but it hasn't been used as much

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo][ironic][heat] Adding back the tripleo check job

n, Nov 30, 2015 at 3:07 PM, Zane Bitter <zbit...@redhat.com> wrote: > >Â Â Â On 30/11/15 12:51, Ruby Loo wrote: > >Â Â Â Â On 30 November 2015 at 10:19, Derek Higgins <der...@redhat.com >Â Â Â Â <mailto:der...@redhat.co

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo][ironic][heat] Adding back the tripleo check job

On 30/11/15 22:18, Steven Hardy wrote: On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 12:51:53PM -0500, Ruby Loo wrote: On 30 November 2015 at 10:19, Derek Higgins <der...@redhat.com> wrote: Hi All, Â Â A few months tripleo switch from its devtest based CI to one that was based on i

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo][ironic][heat] Adding back the tripleo check job

On 30/11/15 17:03, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: On 11/30/2015 04:19 PM, Derek Higgins wrote: Hi All, A few months tripleo switch from its devtest based CI to one that was based on instack. Before doing this we anticipated disruption in the ci jobs and removed them from non tripleo projects

[openstack-dev] [tripleo][ironic][heat] Adding back the tripleo check job

Hi All, A few months tripleo switch from its devtest based CI to one that was based on instack. Before doing this we anticipated disruption in the ci jobs and removed them from non tripleo projects. We'd like to investigate adding it back to heat and ironic as these are the two

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Proposing Ian Wienand as core reviewer on diskimage-builder

On 03/11/15 15:25, Gregory Haynes wrote: Hello everyone, I would like to propose adding Ian Wienand as a core reviewer on the diskimage-builder project. Ian has been making a significant number of contributions for some time to the project, and has been a great help in reviews lately. Thus, I

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] tripleo.org theme

On 25/09/15 13:34, Dan Prince wrote: It has come to my attention that we aren't making great use of our tripleo.org domain. One thing that would be useful would be to have the new tripleo-docs content displayed there. It would also be nice to have quick links to some of our useful resources,

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Current meeting timeslot

On 10/09/15 15:12, Derek Higgins wrote: Hi All, The current meeting slot for TripleO is every second Tuesday @ 1900 UTC, since that time slot was chosen a lot of people have joined the team and others have moved on, I like to revisit the timeslot to see if we can accommodate more people

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Current meeting timeslot

On 15/09/15 12:38, Derek Higgins wrote: On 10/09/15 15:12, Derek Higgins wrote: Hi All, The current meeting slot for TripleO is every second Tuesday @ 1900 UTC, since that time slot was chosen a lot of people have joined the team and others have moved on, I like to revisit the timeslot

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] trello

On 09/09/15 18:03, Jason Rist wrote: On 09/09/2015 07:09 AM, Derek Higgins wrote: On 08/09/15 16:36, Derek Higgins wrote: Hi All, Some of ye may remember some time ago we used to organize TripleO based jobs/tasks on a trello board[1], at some stage this board fell out of use

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Core reviewers for python-tripleoclient and tripleo-common

On 10/09/15 15:06, James Slagle wrote: TripleO has added a few new repositories, one of which is python-tripleoclient[1], the former python-rdomanager-oscplugin. With the additional repositories, there is an additional review burden on our core reviewers. There is also the fact that folks who

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] trello

On 08/09/15 16:36, Derek Higgins wrote: Hi All, Some of ye may remember some time ago we used to organize TripleO based jobs/tasks on a trello board[1], at some stage this board fell out of use (the exact reason I can't put my finger on). This morning I was putting a list of things

[openstack-dev] [TripleO] trello

Hi All, Some of ye may remember some time ago we used to organize TripleO based jobs/tasks on a trello board[1], at some stage this board fell out of use (the exact reason I can't put my finger on). This morning I was putting a list of things together that need to be done in the area of CI

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Status of CI changes

On 03/09/15 07:34, Derek Higgins wrote: Hi All, The patch to reshuffle our CI jobs has merged[1], along with the patch to switch the f21-noha job to be instack based[2] (with centos images). So the current status is that our CI has been removed from most of the non tripleo projects

[openstack-dev] [TripleO] Status of CI changes

Hi All, The patch to reshuffle our CI jobs has merged[1], along with the patch to switch the f21-noha job to be instack based[2] (with centos images). So the current status is that our CI has been removed from most of the non tripleo projects (with the exception of nova/neutron/heat and

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Moving instack upstream

On 08/19/2015 06:42 PM, Derek Higgins wrote: On 06/08/15 15:01, Dougal Matthews wrote: - Original Message - From: Dan Prince dpri...@redhat.com To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Sent: Thursday, 6 August, 2015 1:12:42 PM Subject

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Moving instack upstream

://review.openstack.org/#/c/205479/ 3. pull in 3 repositories upstream https://review.openstack.org/#/c/215186/ There will be follow up patches after these but this will get the ball rolling thanks, Derek. On 23/07/15 07:40, Derek Higgins wrote: See below On 21/07/15 20:29, Derek Higgins wrote: Hi All

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Moving instack upstream

On 06/08/15 15:01, Dougal Matthews wrote: - Original Message - From: Dan Prince dpri...@redhat.com To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Sent: Thursday, 6 August, 2015 1:12:42 PM Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Moving

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Moving instack upstream

On 24/07/15 00:56, James Slagle wrote: On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 2:40 AM, Derek Higgins der...@redhat.com wrote: See below On 21/07/15 20:29, Derek Higgins wrote: Hi All, Something we discussed at the summit was to switch the focus of tripleo's deployment method to deploy using instack

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Moving instack upstream

See below On 21/07/15 20:29, Derek Higgins wrote: Hi All, Something we discussed at the summit was to switch the focus of tripleo's deployment method to deploy using instack using images built with tripleo-puppet-elements. Up to now all the instack work has been done downstream of tripleo

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Moving instack upstream

On 22/07/15 18:41, Gregory Haynes wrote: Excerpts from Derek Higgins's message of 2015-07-21 19:29:49 +: Hi All, Something we discussed at the summit was to switch the focus of tripleo's deployment method to deploy using instack using images built with tripleo-puppet-elements. Up to

[openstack-dev] [TripleO] Moving instack upstream

Hi All, Something we discussed at the summit was to switch the focus of tripleo's deployment method to deploy using instack using images built with tripleo-puppet-elements. Up to now all the instack work has been done downstream of tripleo as part of rdo. Having parts of our deployment

Re: [openstack-dev] [packaging] Adding packaging as an OpenStack project

On 09/06/15 10:37, Dirk Müller wrote: Hi Derek, 2015-06-09 0:34 GMT+02:00 Derek Higgins der...@redhat.com: This patch would result in 80 packaging repositories being pulled into gerrit. I personally would prefer to start with fewer but common packages between all RPM distros

Re: [openstack-dev] [packaging] Adding packaging as an OpenStack project

On 03/06/15 17:28, Haïkel wrote: 2015-06-03 17:23 GMT+02:00 Thomas Goirand z...@debian.org: i On 06/03/2015 12:41 AM, James E. Blair wrote: Hi, This came up at the TC meeting today, and I volunteered to provide an update from the discussion. I've just read the IRC logs. And there's one

Re: [openstack-dev] [packaging] Adding packaging as an OpenStack project

On 02/06/15 23:41, James E. Blair wrote: Hi, This came up at the TC meeting today, and I volunteered to provide an update from the discussion. In general, I think there is a lot of support for a packaging effort in OpenStack. The discussion here has been great; we need to answer a few

Re: [openstack-dev] [packaging] Adding packaging as an OpenStack project

On 28/05/15 22:09, Thomas Goirand wrote: On 05/28/2015 02:53 PM, Derek Higgins wrote: On 28/05/15 12:07, Jaume Devesa wrote: Hi Thomas, Delorean is a tool to build rpm packages from master branches (maybe any branch?) of OpenStack projects. Check out here: https://www.rdoproject.org

Re: [openstack-dev] [packaging] Adding packaging as an OpenStack project

On 28/05/15 20:58, Paul Belanger wrote: On 05/27/2015 05:26 PM, Derek Higgins wrote: On 27/05/15 09:14, Thomas Goirand wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi all, tl;dr: - - We'd like to push distribution packaging of OpenStack on upstream gerrit with reviews

Re: [openstack-dev] [packaging] Adding packaging as an OpenStack project

On 29/05/15 02:54, Steve Kowalik wrote: On 29/05/15 06:41, Haïkel wrote: Here's the main script to rebuild a RPM package. https://github.com/openstack-packages/delorean/blob/master/scripts/build_rpm.sh The script basically uses rpmbuild to build packages, we could have a build_deb.sh that

Re: [openstack-dev] [packaging] Adding packaging as an OpenStack project

that the rpm's are being built using rpmbuild inside a docker container, if expanding to add dep support this is where we could plug in sbuild. Regards, On Thu, 28 May 2015 10:40, Thomas Goirand wrote: Derek, Thanks for what you wrote. On 05/27/2015 11:26 PM, Derek Higgins wrote: 4

Re: [openstack-dev] [packaging] Adding packaging as an OpenStack project

On 27/05/15 09:14, Thomas Goirand wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi all, tl;dr: - - We'd like to push distribution packaging of OpenStack on upstream gerrit with reviews. - - The intention is to better share the workload, and improve the overall QA for packaging *and*

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Core reviewer update proposal

On 05/05/15 12:57, James Slagle wrote: Hi, I'd like to propose adding Giulio Fidente and Steve Hardy to TripleO Core. Giulio has been an active member of our community for a while. He worked on the HA implementation in the elements and recently has been making a lot of valuable contributions

Re: [openstack-dev] TripleO: CI down... SSL cert expired

On 11/04/15 14:02, Dan Prince wrote: Looks like our SSL certificate has expired for the currently active CI cloud. We are working on getting a new one generated and installed. Until then CI jobs won't get processed. A new cert has been installed in the last few minutes and ZUUL has started

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] CI outage

Tl;dr tripleo ci is back up and running, see below for more On 21/03/15 01:41, Dan Prince wrote: Short version: The RH1 CI region has been down since yesterday afternoon. We have a misbehaving switch and have file a support ticket with the vendor to troubleshoot things further. We hope to

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] update on Puppet integration in Kilo

On 11/02/15 17:06, Dan Prince wrote: I wanted to take a few minutes to go over the progress we've made with TripleO Puppet in Kilo so far. For those unfamilar with the efforts our initial goal was to be able to use Puppet as the configuration tool for a TripleO deployment stack. This is

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Bug squashing followup

a group of 15 bugs. thanks, Derek. On 18/12/14 11:25, Derek Higgins wrote: While bug squashing yesterday, I went through quite a lot of bugs closing those that were already fixed or no longer relevant, closing around 40 bugs. I eventually ran out of time, but I'm pretty sure if we split the task up

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Switching CI back to amd64

On 07/01/15 23:41, Ben Nemec wrote: On 01/07/2015 11:29 AM, Clint Byrum wrote: Excerpts from Derek Higgins's message of 2015-01-07 02:51:41 -0800: Hi All, I intended to bring this up at this mornings meeting but the train I was on had no power sockets (and I had no battery) so sending to

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] default region name

On 08/01/15 05:21, Zhou, Zhenzan wrote: Hi, Does anyone know why TripleO uses regionOne as default region name? A comment in the code says it's the default keystone uses. But I cannot find any regionOne in keystone code. Devstack uses RegionOne by default and I do see lots of RegionOne

[openstack-dev] [TripleO] Switching CI back to amd64

Hi All, I intended to bring this up at this mornings meeting but the train I was on had no power sockets (and I had no battery) so sending to the list instead. We currently run our CI with on images built for i386, we took this decision a while back to save memory ( at the time is allowed us

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Bug squashing followup

See below, We got only 5 people signed up, anybody else willing to join the effort ? TL;DR if your willing to assess about 15 tripleo related bugs to decide if they are still current then add your name to the etherpad. thanks, Derek On 18/12/14 11:25, Derek Higgins wrote: While bug squashing

[openstack-dev] [TripleO] Bug squashing followup

While bug squashing yesterday, I went through quite a lot of bugs closing those that were already fixed or no longer relevant, closing around 40 bugs. I eventually ran out of time, but I'm pretty sure if we split the task up between us we could weed out a lot more. What I'd like to do is, as a

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] How do the CI clouds work?

On 18/12/14 08:48, Steve Kowalik wrote: Hai, I am finding myself at a loss at explaining how the CI clouds that run the tripleo jobs work from end-to-end. I am clear that we have a tripleo deployment running on those racks, with a seed, a HA undercloud and overcloud, but then I'm left

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] CI report : 1/11/2014 - 4/12/2014

On 04/12/14 13:37, Dan Prince wrote: On Thu, 2014-12-04 at 11:51 +, Derek Higgins wrote: A month since my last update, sorry my bad since the last email we've had 5 incidents causing ci failures 26/11/2014 : Lots of ubuntu jobs failed over 24 hours (maybe half) - We seem to suffer any

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Alternate meeting time

On 02/12/14 14:10, James Polley wrote: Months ago, I pushed for us to alternate meeting times to something that was friendlier to me, so we started doing alternate weeks at 0700UTC. That worked well for me, but wasn't working so well for a few people in Europe, so we decided to give 0800UTC a

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Alternate meeting time

On 02/12/14 15:12, Giulio Fidente wrote: On 12/02/2014 03:45 PM, Derek Higgins wrote: On 02/12/14 14:10, James Polley wrote: Months ago, I pushed for us to alternate meeting times to something that was friendlier to me, so we started doing alternate weeks at 0700UTC. That worked well for me

  1   2   >