On Thu, Nov 1, 2018, 10:44 AM Rambo wrote:
> Hi,all
>
> Recently, I use the nfs driver as the cinder-backup backend, when I
> use it to backup the volume snapshot, the result is return the
> NotImplementedError[1].And the nfs.py doesn't has the
> create_volume_from_snapshot function. Does
Kevin,
Just a note thatyou may need to look way back in the logs to find the cause
as there m as y be many periodic job failures filling the logs.
Jay
On Sun, Jul 1, 2018, 7:09 AM Ivan Kolodyazhny wrote:
> Hi Kevin,
>
> Do you have any errors or tracebacks in
On Sat, Jun 23, 2018, 9:39 AM Volodymyr Litovka wrote:
> Dear friends,
>
> I did some tests with making volume available without stopping VM. I'm
> using CEPH and these steps produce the following results:
>
> 1) openstack volume set --state available [UUID]
> - nothing changed inside both VM
On Thu, Jun 7, 2018, 4:17 PM Matt Riedemann wrote:
> On 6/7/2018 1:54 PM, Jay Pipes wrote:
> >
> > If Cinder tracks volume attachments as consumable resources, then this
> > would be my preference.
>
> Cinder does:
>
> https://developer.openstack.org/api-ref/block-storage/v3/#attachments
>
>
Just a reminder there is no meeting because ofthe summit today.
Jay
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
Agree this is a good idea.
Let me know what we can do to help.
Jay
On Mon, Mar 19, 2018, 9:58 AM Jim Rollenhagen
wrote:
> Ironic (and surely other projects) have had to point out many times that
> specs are a point in time design discussion, and not completed
>
On Wed, Dec 13, 2017, 4:20 PM Thierry Carrez wrote:
> Ed Leafe wrote:
> > On Dec 13, 2017, at 12:13 PM, Tim Bell wrote:
> >
> >> There is a risk that deployment to production is delayed, and therefore
> feedback is delayed and the wait for the ‘initial
a good chance
> to get multi-attach support into Nova in Queens.
> >
> > We have a plan for multi-attach support [3] which I think is doable
> before feature freeze. The Cinder 3.48 API is now available too which Nova
> needs to correctly detach a multi-attach volume.
> &g
Sounds like a good plan. Hopefully we can do some OUI work face to face as
well?
Jay
On Thu, Dec 14, 2017, 2:55 PM Kendall Nelson wrote:
> Hello,
>
> It came up in a discussion today that it might be good to get together and
> discuss all the activities around on
Thierry,
I have been happy with the current 2 day/3 day split. I am concerned that
I would have a harder time getting focus from the project team splitting
across multiple half days. That is just my hunch.
Jay
On Mon, Nov 27, 2017, 1:21 PM Doug Hellmann wrote:
>
Just a reminder that we do not have a meeting this week as a number of
people will be traveling.
See you in Sydney!
Jay
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe:
Team,
I have found a place that I hope we will all enjoy for dinner. The
general consensus was to do Thursday night with a few exceptions. So, I
went with the majority and made reservations for Thursday night at 7
pm. Here are the details:
* */Location: Casey's Bistro and Pub - 7301
I think that making it so we can do redirect is good. The current
blackhole approach is less than desirable.
Jay
On 7/27/2017 10:06 PM, ChangBo Guo wrote:
++ for the solution.
2017-07-28 2:24 GMT+08:00 Doug Hellmann >:
Excerpts
On Thu, Jun 15, 2017, 10:45 AM Tim Bell wrote:
> OpenStack Nucleus and OpenStack Electrons?
>
> Tim
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Thierry Carrez
> Organization: OpenStack
> Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
I had forgotten that we added this and am guessing that other cores did as
well. As a result, it likely, was not enforced in driver reviews.
I need to better understand the benefit. In don't think there is a hurry to
remove this right now. Can we put it on the agenda for Denver?
Jay
On Fri, Jun
On 5/23/2017 9:56 AM, Duncan Thomas wrote:
On 23 May 2017 4:51 am, "Matt Riedemann" > wrote:
Is this really something we are going to have to deny at least
once per release? My God how is it that this is the #1 thing
everyone
I had expected more cinder/nova sessions the first days, so I like that
proposal.
If we are able to minimize project overlap or have alternatives the last 3
days I think we are moving towards a better solution.
Jay
On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 9:18 AM Thierry Carrez
wrote:
>
On 5/18/2017 4:57 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Hi again,
For the PTG events we have, by design, a pretty loose schedule. Each
room is free to organize their agenda in whatever way they see fit, and
take breaks whenever they need. This flexibility is key to keep our
productivity at those events
On 4/1/2017 4:07 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote:
On 4/1/2017 12:17 PM, Jay Bryant wrote:
Matt,
I think discussion on this goes all the way back to Tokyo. There was
work on the Cinder side to send the notification to Nova which I believe
all the pieces were in place for. The missing part (sticking
Matt,
I think discussion on this goes all the way back to Tokyo. There was
work on the Cinder side to send the notification to Nova which I believe
all the pieces were in place for. The missing part (sticking point) was
doing a rescan of the SCSI bus in the node that had the extended volume
Kendall,
Did you end up reserving a room for Cinder or did others need it?
Since Sean left it open I wanted to know the status so we could plan
appropriately.
Thanks!
Jay
On 3/16/2017 3:03 PM, Kendall Nelson wrote:
@James Already have Charms on the list :)
@Telles I can put Sahara down
Sean,
Thank you for getting this note out!
If anyone has comments for improvement of the format, please let me
know. Want to continue to improve our access to information and make it
easier to leverage that information in the future!
Thanks!
Jay Bryant (jungleboyj)
On 3/3/2017 1:42 PM
lson (diablo_rojo)
[1] https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCJ8Koy4gsISMy0qW3CWZmaQ
On Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 1:45 PM Sean McGinnis <sean.mcgin...@gmx.com
<mailto:sean.mcgin...@gmx.com>> wrote:
I leiu of a lengthy email that very few will read, this is just a
pointer.
Jay Bryant
Akira,
Cinder has been working on creating a standalone service that could run on
bare metal nodes. [1]. I am thinking this could meet your needs or be
enhanced to meet your needs. Don't think we want to create a separate
service for it.
Jay
[1]
I agree with Duncan here. Driver removal has been an important tool to keep
only maintained drivers in the tree and a way to get attention to ignored
drivers. I hate to see the tag removed but think we need to stay true to
the approach we have been taking.
Re-addressing the meaning of the tag
I have enough experience to know that the notes will not be read.
I think we need to pull Walt and Kendall in and come up with a safer
solution to this.
That is my 2 cents. :-)
Jay
On Sat, Aug 13, 2016 at 5:07 PM Matt Riedemann
wrote:
> On 8/12/2016 8:54 AM, Matt
Turbo,
First, trying to understand why you are trying to create a new driver for
Mitaka. New drivers need to go into the latest release. More information
can be found here:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Cinder/how-to-contribute-a-driver
Second, there really isn't any other way with Python,
he become ambiguous in the future? I doubt there are
> many operations or objects that are unique to Cinder - backup, snapshot,
> transfer, group, type - these are all very much generic, and even if they
> aren't ambiguous now, they might well become so in future...
>
> On 5 April 2
All,
Just to document the discussion we had during the OSC IRC meeting last
week: I believe the consensus we reached was that it wasn't appropriate to
pretend "volume" before all Cinder commands but that it would be
appropriate to move in that direction to for any commands that may be
ambiguous
Great idea Gorka! I know I could benefit from this as a reviewer.
Thanks for proposing it.
Jay
On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 3:52 PM Gorka Eguileor wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As you all probably know, during this cycle we have introduced quite a
> big number of changes in cinder that
+1. Patrick's contributions to Cinder have been notable since he joined us
and he is a pleasure to work with! Welcome to the core team Patrick!
Jay
On Fri, Jan 29, 2016, 19:05 Sean McGinnis wrote:
> Patrick has been a strong contributor to Cinder over the last few
>
All,
Has anyone found a way to do code reviews on an iPad. In the old Gerrit you
could. With the new interface attempts to enter comments don't work. It
looks like you should be able to enter text but when you type the page just
jumps around. Very frustrating.
I have tried Safari and Chrome with
Since Mike is out I wanted to respond to this:
I don't think we a re planning to take FFE requests this time around. Also,
the core team discussed this particular item and felt that there are still
too many open questions on the patch and the patch is too invasive to merge
this late in the game.
Taylor,
I am adding some IBMers who are also looking into making this work. PowerVC
has a solution hacked into place but we are working on getting a more
general solution implemented for Mitaka. Hoping we can all work together to
get a solution in place.
Will you be in Tokyo? If so, it would be
Thierry,
Well put, and interesting. I didn't know about the other cultural concerns
around numbers.
Most importantly, I think using names for releases is better than numbers,
creating a more personal connection to each release. Would hate to see that
end.
Unfortunately there isn't much we can
+1. I think this is a good comment for all reviews. I have been frustrated
lately with a number of reviews that I spent time upon but didn't feel
should be scored. I think that 0 with comments should be counted as well.
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 2:27 PM Tim Bell tim.b...@cern.ch wrote:
Vincent,
Best place to start is with Sean McGinnis.
Jay
On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 10:00 PM Sheng Bo Hou sb...@cn.ibm.com wrote:
Hi everyone,
For folks who are working on Dell, Storpool and Infortrend drivers:
I have got a new patch for https://review.openstack.org/#/c/180873. There
is a
I too would prefer option 2. Would rather do the pack ports than remove the
functionality.
Jay
On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 9:40 AM Gorka Eguileor gegui...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 08:49:55AM -0700, Mike Perez wrote:
There was a bug raised [1] from some large deployments that the
+1 Well deserved. Welcome to Core Sean! It is a pleasure to work with you!
Thanks to Avishay for all his contributions! Sorry to see you go.
Jay
On May 22, 2015 4:36 PM, Mike Perez thin...@gmail.com wrote:
This is long overdue, but it gives me great pleasure to nominate Sean
McGinnis for
Mike,
I am communicating this problem with my teams and will get it resolved asap.
Jay
On Mar 26, 2015 1:23 PM, Mike Perez thin...@gmail.com wrote:
On 09:39 Thu 26 Mar , Mike Perez wrote:
As discussed in the last Cinder meeting [1], in order to have your volume
driver readded into the
Mike,
This effort has taken quite some time and was going to require hard
decisions to be made at some point. You have been more than patient in
this process and I commend you for that as well as all the communication.
Thank you for continuing to drive this!
Jay
On Mar 24, 2015 10:55 PM,
+2. I think the having checks are helpful. If they aren't removed it does
Leelee harm.
Jay
On Mar 15, 2015 6:39 AM, Duncan Thomas duncan.tho...@gmail.com wrote:
On 13 March 2015 at 17:36, Doug Hellmann d...@doughellmann.com wrote:
I wish we, as a community, were less obsessed with creating
I agree with Walt that reverting this is the right answer.
Please make sure to have your ci running as well for liberty.
Jay
On Mar 4, 2015 2:30 AM, Zhangni zhan...@huawei.com wrote:
Hi Mike, Jay, and Walter,
Please revisit this patch https://review.openstack.org/#/c/151959/ and
don’t
+2
I recently had a patch abandoned that had every right to be pulled off the
list. It had fallen off my radar and was no longer relevant.
As long as there is a way to restore the patch where appropriate, we
should do it.
Jay
I have to agree with John. We have many more submitters than we
Fyi ...
This is something that Mike Perez was thinking about so you can ping
thingee on irc if you can't find e0ne.
Jay
On Feb 27, 2015 3:51 AM, harryxiyou harryxi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I cannot find the proper idea about Openstack Cinder for GSOC 2015
here[1]. Could anyone please
+1
Ivan had been doing a great job! Will be glad to have him (officially) on
the team!
Jay
On Jan 21, 2015 10:18 AM, Mike Perez thin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 10:14 AM, Mike Perez thin...@gmail.com wrote:
It gives me great pleasure to nominate Ivan Kolodyazhny (e0ne) for
Mike,
Thanks for the diligent efforts to get the word out!
Jay
On Jan 20, 2015 12:30 PM, Mike Perez thin...@gmail.com wrote:
On 13:53 Tue 20 Jan , Erlon Cruz wrote:
Thanks Deepak!
Mike is also sending the announce to the vendors in the mail accounts
listed in the CI Status
+2 This topic had come up in Cinder I believe as well.
Having a common devref for common content would be good and would make it
easier to keep the documentation current.
Jay
On Jan 20, 2015 4:05 PM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:
On 01/20/2015 01:30 PM, Ian Cordasco wrote:
On Jan 20,
We talked about this in Cinder. I am planning to create some hacking
checks for us just to be safe. Shouldn't take a ton of effort.
Jay
On Jan 8, 2015 12:03 PM, Doug Hellmann d...@doughellmann.com wrote:
On Jan 8, 2015, at 11:29 AM, Ihar Hrachyshka ihrac...@redhat.com
wrote:
On
I have a patch out to resolve this failure:
https://review.openstack.org/145642
Jay
-- Forwarded message --
From: A mailing list for the OpenStack Stable Branch test reports.
openstack-stable-ma...@lists.openstack.org
Date: Jan 8, 2015 1:40 AM
Subject: [Openstack-stable-maint]
+2. How contributions have always been helpful.
On Jan 7, 2015 8:50 AM, Alan Pevec ape...@gmail.com wrote:
+2 Flavio knows stable branch policies very well and will be a good
addition to the cross-projects stable team.
Cheers,
Alan
___
Dave,
My apologies. We have not yet set a day that we are freezing BP/Spec
approval for Cinder.
We had a deadline in November for new drivers being proposed but haven't
frozen other proposals yet. I mixed things up with Nova's 12/18 cutoff.
Not sure when we will be cutting off BPs for
Vikram,
The process is documented here: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Blueprints
Let me know if you have questions.
Jay
On Dec 16, 2014 11:18 PM, Vikram Choudhary vikram.choudh...@huawei.com
wrote:
Dear All,
We want to submit a new blueprint for review.
Can you please provide the
Dave,
Yes, we are not taking new specs/blueprints after 12/18.
Jay
On Dec 15, 2014 9:18 PM, Chen, Wei D wei.d.c...@intel.com wrote:
Hi,
I know nova has such day around Dec. 18, is there a similar day in Cinder
project? thanks!
Best Regards,
Dave Chen
On Saturday, December 13, 2014, Deepak Shetty dpkshe...@gmail.com wrote:
I think you completely mis-understood my Q
I am completely in agreement for _not_ putting CI status in mailing list.
Let me rephrase:
As of now, I see 2 places where CI status is being tracked:
It isn't a huge change. I am ok with it if we can get the issues
addressed. Especially Duncan's concern.
On Sep 11, 2014 12:17 PM, Mike Perez thin...@gmail.com wrote:
On 12:23 Tue 09 Sep , yunling wrote:
Hi Cinder Folks,I would like to request a FFE for add reset-state
function for
an untranslated
correct message than a translated incorrect message. :-)
- Joe
On Sep 5, 2014, at 3:41 PM, Jay Bryant jsbry...@electronicjungle.net
mailto:jsbry...@electronicjungle.net wrote:
Matt,
I don't think that is the right solution.
If the string changes I think the only
Not sure if the patch to make the ssh strict policy setting configurable
needed an official ffe. It merged after the tag so I wanted to cover my
bases.
This is my request.
Thanks!
Jay
https://review.openstack.org/114336
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
Matt,
I don't think that is the right solution.
If the string changes I think the only problem is it won't be translated if
it is thrown. That is better than breaking the coding standard imho.
Jay
On Sep 5, 2014 3:30 PM, Matt Riedemann mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
On 9/5/2014 5:10
+2
I prefer the LOG.warning format and support that given the documentation
you shared.
If there is agreement I would create a hacking check.
Jay
On Aug 17, 2014 1:28 AM, Gary Kotton gkot...@vmware.com wrote:
Hi,
Over the last few weeks I have seen a number of patches where LOG.warn is
Sean,
Thanks for making this change!
Jay
On Jul 25, 2014 5:41 AM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote:
On 07/25/2014 01:18 AM, Ian Wienand wrote:
On 07/16/2014 11:15 PM, Alexis Lee wrote:
What do you think about allowing some text after the words recheck no
bug?
I think this is a good
Great question Josh!
Have been doing a lot of mentoring within IBM for OpenStack and have now
been asked to formalize some of that work. Not surprised there is an
external need as well.
Anne and Stefano. Let me know if the kids anything I can do to help.
Jay
Hi all,
I was reading over a IMHO
I had been under the impression that all BPs we going to require a spec.
I, however, was made are in today's cinder meeting that we are only
requiring specs for changes that change the user's interaction with the
system or are a large change that touches the broader cinder code base.
This
I agree Duncan.
I think the commit message is one of the most important parts of a
commit. If the message is not useful, the code shouldn't go in.
Jay Bryant
On Jun 22, 2014 1:51 PM, Duncan Thomas duncan.tho...@gmail.com wrote:
On 22 June 2014 14:41, Amrith Kumar amr...@tesora.com wrote
+1 To translating oslo logs. There is quite a bit of logging that comes
out of the libraries. It should be logged for consistency using delayed
translation.
Jay
On Jun 20, 2014 8:22 AM, Doug Hellmann doug.hellm...@dreamhost.com
wrote:
On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 8:40 AM, Mark McLoughlin
John,
+2
I am guilty of falling behind on reviews. Pulled in to a lot of other stuff
since the summit ... and before.
Having prescribed time on my calendar is a good idea. Just put it on my
calendar.
Jay
On Jun 12, 2014 10:49 PM, John Griffith john.griff...@solidfire.com
wrote:
Hey
66 matches
Mail list logo