: Pasquale Porreca pasquale.porr...@dektech.com.au
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2015 3:24:03 AM
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Keystone] [devstack] About _member_ role
Analyzing Horizon code I
://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
Pasquale Porreca
DEK Technologies
Via dei Castelli Romani, 22
00040 Pomezia (Roma)
Mobile +39 3394823805
Skype paskporr
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List
and the real bug is somewhere else
- in Horizon code with highest chance.
On 02/17/15 21:01, Jamie Lennox wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Pasquale Porreca pasquale.porr...@dektech.com.au
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
, Pasquale Porreca wrote:
I saw 2 different bug report that Devstack dashboard gives an error when
trying to manage projects
https://bugs.launchpad.net/devstack/+bug/1421616 and
https://bugs.launchpad.net/horizon/+bug/1421999
In my devstack environment projects were working just fine, so I tried
by itself?
--
Pasquale Porreca
DEK Technologies
Via dei Castelli Romani, 22
00040 Pomezia (Roma)
Mobile +39 3394823805
Skype paskporr
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack
?) of the accepted (i.e. that trigger specific
feature in nova) key-value pairs is in horizon dashboard, when logged
with admin credential.
I am a bit confused on how someone working to add a new key/value pair
should proceed.
--
Pasquale Porreca
DEK Technologies
Via dei Castelli Romani, 22
00040 Pomezia (Roma
nova/virt/hardware.py so maybe the name choice was not so good.
On 02/11/15 11:25, Bhandaru, Malini K wrote:
Pasquale Porreca,
The flexibility/ freedom to create meta data tags for images and Nova flavor
extra specs can be confusing. Even allows one to make typographical errors
that may
Thank you very much for the clarification :)
On 02/11/15 12:15, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 12:03:58PM +0100, Pasquale Porreca wrote:
Thank you for all answers.
I know that meta data tags are free to use with any key/value, still
there are some specific values
)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
Pasquale Porreca
DEK Technologies
Via dei Castelli Romani, 22
00040 Pomezia (Roma)
Mobile +39 3394823805
Skype paskporr
(not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
Pasquale Porreca
DEK Technologies
Via dei Castelli Romani, 22
00040 Pomezia (Roma)
Mobile +39 3394823805
Skype paskporr
delete the message
and any attachments. Thank you
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
Pasquale Porreca
DEK Technologies
Via dei Castelli Romani, 22
.
The v2.1 framework is more flexible and you should need no changes to
servers.py at all as there are hooks for adding extra parameters in
separate plugins. There are examples of this in the v3 directory which
is really v2.1 now.
Chris
On Thu, 18 Dec 2014 at 3:49 am, Pasquale Porreca
pasquale.porr
I created a bug report and proposed a fix for this issue:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1403586
@Matthew Gilliard: I added you as reviewer for my patch, since you asked
for it.
Thanks to anyone that will want to review the bug report and the patch.
On 12/18/14 09:33, Pasquale Porreca
response or corrections with my above understanding.
Thanks,
Paddu
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
Pasquale Porreca
DEK Technologies
Via dei
be raised to allow new v2 extensions
4) The code of that module should be refactored to lower the complexity
(i.e. move the load of each extension in a separate function)
I would like to know if any of my point is close to the correct solution.
--
Pasquale Porreca
DEK Technologies
Via dei Castelli
.
--
Pasquale Porreca
DEK Technologies
Via dei Castelli Romani, 22
00040 Pomezia (Roma)
Mobile +39 3394823805
Skype paskporr
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo
Is there a specific reason for which a fixed ip is bound to a port on a
subnet where dhcp is disabled? it is confusing to have this info shown
when the instance doesn't have actually an ip on that port.
Should I fill a bug report, or is this a wanted behavior?
--
Pasquale Porreca
DEK
in the instance too; the second one: if in the
future one wants to pass to another cloud infrastructure it will be more
difficult to achieve it.
On 12/12/14 01:20, Joe Gordon wrote:
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 7:42 AM, Pasquale Porreca
pasquale.porr...@dektech.com.au wrote:
Well, one of the main
:
- Original Message -
From: Pasquale Porreca pasquale.porr...@dektech.com.au
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Well, one of the main reason to choose an open source product is to
avoid vendor lock-in. I think it is not
advisable to embed in the software running in an instance
Well, one of the main reason to choose an open source product is to
avoid vendor lock-in. I think it is not
advisableto embed in the software running in an instance a call to
OpenStack specific services.
On 12/10/14 00:20, Joe Gordon wrote:
On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 1:16 AM, Pasquale Porreca
/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
Pasquale Porreca
DEK Technologies
Via dei Castelli Romani, 22
00040 Pomezia (Roma)
Mobile +39 3394823805
Skype paskporr
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http
://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
Pasquale Porreca
DEK Technologies
Via dei Castelli Romani, 22
00040 Pomezia (Roma)
Mobile +39 3394823805
Skype paskporr
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http
the changes are merged?
On 11/16/14 23:55, Christopher Yeoh wrote:
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 12:14 AM, Pasquale Porreca
pasquale.porr...@dektech.com.au
mailto:pasquale.porr...@dektech.com.au wrote:
Hello
I am working on an api for a new feature in nova, but I am
wondering what
Regards,
Chris
--
Pasquale Porreca
DEK Technologies
Via dei Castelli Romani, 22
00040 Pomezia (Roma)
Mobile +39 3394823805
Skype paskporr
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman
Hello
I am working on an api for a new feature in nova, but I am wondering
what is the correct way to add a new extension: should it be supported
by v2, v3 or both?
BR
--
Pasquale Porreca
DEK Technologies
Via dei Castelli Romani, 22
00040 Pomezia (Roma)
Mobile +39 3394823805
Skype
the chance to the user to set uiid version (1 or
4, with the latter as default) when creating a new instance and in case
of version 1 to pass optionally a value for parameter /node/.
Any thoughts?
On 09/30/14 14:07, Andrew Laski wrote:
On 09/30/2014 06:53 AM, Pasquale Porreca wrote:
Going back
option rather then use metadata.
On 09/25/14 17:26, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 05:23:22PM +0200, Pasquale Porreca wrote:
This is correct Daniel, except that that it is done by the virtual
firmware/BIOS of the virtual machine and not by the OS (not yet installed at
that time
Projects
Mirantis Inc
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
Pasquale Porreca
DEK Technologies
Via dei Castelli Romani, 22
00040 Pomezia (Roma)
Mobile +39
a matter of tagging an instance, there is also the tags
blueprint [2] which will probably be proposed again for Kilo.
[1]
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/enforce-unique-instance-uuid-in-db
[2] https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/tag-instances
--
Pasquale Porreca
DEK
trying to
boot from network.
Reference:
http://www.iana.org/assignments/bootp-dhcp-parameters/bootp-dhcp-parameters.xhtml
On 09/25/14 14:43, Andrew Laski wrote:
On 09/25/2014 04:18 AM, Pasquale Porreca wrote:
I will briefly explain our use case. This idea is related to another
project
(the target if the
network boot is exactly to install the OS on the instance!), so it won't
be able to mount it.
On 09/25/14 16:24, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 09:19:03AM -0500, Matt Riedemann wrote:
On 9/25/2014 8:26 AM, Pasquale Porreca wrote:
The problem to use
.
Would it be acceptable to pass the uuid as metadata, or should I instead
modify the api if I want to set the UUID from the novaclient?
Best regards
--
Pasquale Porreca
DEK Technologies
Via dei Castelli Romani, 22
00040 Pomezia (Roma)
Mobile +39 3394823805
Skype paskporr
32 matches
Mail list logo
