Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] about use shared image with each other

no quota necessary for this operation. >   > -- Original -- > *From: * "Brian Rosmaita"; > *Date: * Mon, Nov 19, 2018 10:26 PM > *To: * "OpenStack Developmen"; > *Subject: * Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] about use shared image with >

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] about use shared image with each other

2018 10:26 PM To: "OpenStack Developmen"; Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] about use shared image with each other On 11/19/18 7:58 AM, Rambo wrote: > Hi,all > > Recently, I want to use the shared image with each other.I find it > isn't convenient that the pr

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] about use shared image with each other

On 11/19/18 7:58 AM, Rambo wrote: > Hi,all > >      Recently, I want to use the shared image with each other.I find it > isn't convenient that the producer notifies the consumer via email which > the image has been shared and what its UUID is. In other words, why the > image api v2 is no

[openstack-dev] [glance] about use shared image with each other

Hi,all Recently, I want to use the shared image with each other.I find it isn't convenient that the producer notifies the consumer via email which the image has been shared and what its UUID is. In other words, why the image api v2 is no provision for producer-consumer communication?

[openstack-dev] [glance][tc] Seeking feedback on the OpenStack cloud vision

Greetings, Glance team! As you may be aware, I've been working with other folks in the community on documenting a vision for OpenStack clouds (formerly known as the 'Technical Vision') - essentially to interpret the mission statement in long-form, in a way that we can use to actually help

[openstack-dev] [glance] next python-glanceclient release

Hello Glancers, I was looking at a Cinder patch [0] and it made me realize that we should do a glanceclient release that includes the multihash-download-verification [1] before the next scheduled Stein release (which was to be 3.0.0, basically Rocky with v1 support removed; see [2]). I think it

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance][upgrade-checkers] Question about glance rocky upgrade release note

I haven't implemented any checks, but I did take a shot at laying down the scaffolding for implementing upgrade checks in glance [0]. Anyone who is more familiar with glance should be able to build off of that commit by implementing specific checks in glance/cmd/status.py [0]

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance][upgrade-checkers] Question about glance rocky upgrade release note

On 9/24/18 3:13 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: > On 9/24/2018 2:06 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: >> Are there more specific docs about how to configure the 'image import' >> feature so that I can be sure I'm careful? In other words, are there >> specific things a "glance-status upgrade check" check could

[openstack-dev] [glance] spec-lite: Embed validation data in locations

I put together an etherpad outlining the changes to Iain's spec-lite [0] that we discussed at today's glance meeting: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/glance-spec-lite-stein-locations-with-checksum It's probably best to leave comments on the etherpad. cheers, brian [0]

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] Glance API Caching Enhancements for Edge Computing

;openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org" < > openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> > *Subject: *Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] Glance API Caching Enhancements > for Edge Computing > > > > Hi Greg, > > > > Have you actually filed a blueprint or specs for this in glance?

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] Glance API Caching Enhancements for Edge Computing

k.org" Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] Glance API Caching Enhancements for Edge Computing Hi Greg, Have you actually filed a blueprint or specs for this in glance? If yes could you please provide a reference for the same. Thanks & Best Regards, Abhishek Kekane On Thu, Oct 4,

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] Glance API Caching Enhancements for Edge Computing

Hi Greg, Have you actually filed a blueprint or specs for this in glance? If yes could you please provide a reference for the same. Thanks & Best Regards, Abhishek Kekane On Thu, Oct 4, 2018 at 12:34 AM Waines, Greg wrote: > Glance Team, > > > > I am following up on discussions in the

[openstack-dev] [glance] Glance API Caching Enhancements for Edge Computing

Glance Team, I am following up on discussions in the edge-computing PTG meetings. There were discussions on potential enhancements to Glance API Caching for support of the proposed MVP Edge Architecture. And I took the action to write up a blueprint and a specification for these enhancements

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance][upgrade-checkers] Question about glance rocky upgrade release note

On 9/24/2018 2:06 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: Are there more specific docs about how to configure the 'image import' feature so that I can be sure I'm careful? In other words, are there specific things a "glance-status upgrade check" check could look at and say, "your image import configuration

[openstack-dev] [glance][upgrade-checkers] Question about glance rocky upgrade release note

Looking at the upgrade-checkers goal [1] for glance and the Rocky upgrade release notes [2], one upgrade note says: "As Image Import will be always enabled, care needs to be taken that it is configured properly from this release forward. The ‘enable_image_import’ option is silently ignored."

[openstack-dev] [glance] replace locations on queued image

I feel like I've been chasing this issue around in circles for months, and I need the core team to make a decision. I cannot proceed with Rocky deployment/upgrade until this gets resolved. It's currently possible to add to, or completely replace, the "locations" for an image with status "queued",

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance][keystone][nova][ironic][tripleo][edge][airship] Edge related joint sessions at the PTG next week

On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 5:41 PM Ildiko Vancsa wrote: > Hi, > > The PTG is approaching quickly and as we are planning a couple of joint > sessions on edge computing with a couple of OpenStack project teams I would > like to give a quick summary of the plans. > > We have the Edge Computing Group

[openstack-dev] [glance][keystone][nova][ironic][tripleo][edge][airship] Edge related joint sessions at the PTG next week

Hi, The PTG is approaching quickly and as we are planning a couple of joint sessions on edge computing with a couple of OpenStack project teams I would like to give a quick summary of the plans. We have the Edge Computing Group meeting all day Tuesday in Ballroom A[1] from 9am MDT. The group

[openstack-dev] [glance][ptl] Canceled: Glance meeting Thu 6th and 13th of Sept

Hi all, PTG is approaching fast and I'm pretty much offline this week for holidays so will cancel the two next meetings. We will get together over Wed to Fri in the PTG and have next Glance weekly meeting the week after. Safe travels everyone and I'm looking forward to see as many of ye as

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance][horizon] Issues we found when using Community Images

Hi again Andy, Thanks for the update. Sounds like there is some work to do in various client libraries first. I also just tried to launch a Sahara cluster against a community image-- it failed, because our current validation wants the image ID to actually appear in the image list. So there will

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance][horizon] Issues we found when using Community Images

Hi Jeremy, > Can you comment more on what needs to be updated in Sahara? Are they > simply issues in the UI (sahara-dashboard) or is there a problem > consuming community images on the server side? We haven't looked into it much yet, so I couldn't tell you. I think it would be great to extend

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance][horizon] Issues we found when using Community Images

Hi Andy, Can you comment more on what needs to be updated in Sahara? Are they simply issues in the UI (sahara-dashboard) or is there a problem consuming community images on the server side? I'm happy to pitch in, just would like to do it efficiently. Thanks, Jeremy On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 5:31

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance][horizon] Issues we found when using Community Images

On 08/22/2018 04:31 PM, Andy Botting wrote: Hi all, We've recently moved to using Glance's community visibility on the Nectar Research Cloud. We had lots of public images (12255), and we found it was becoming slow to list them all and the community image visibility seems to fit our use-case

[openstack-dev] [glance][horizon] Issues we found when using Community Images

Hi all, We've recently moved to using Glance's community visibility on the Nectar Research Cloud. We had lots of public images (12255), and we found it was becoming slow to list them all and the community image visibility seems to fit our use-case nicely. We moved all of our user's images over

[openstack-dev] glance 17.0.0.0rc2 (rocky)

Hello everyone, A new release candidate for glance for the end of the Rocky cycle is available! You can find the source code tarball at: https://tarballs.openstack.org/glance/ Unless release-critical issues are found that warrant a release candidate respin, this candidate will be formally

[openstack-dev] glance 17.0.0.0rc1 (rocky)

Hello everyone, A new release candidate for glance for the end of the Rocky cycle is available! You can find the source code tarball at: https://tarballs.openstack.org/glance/ Unless release-critical issues are found that warrant a release candidate respin, this candidate will be formally

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] FFE for multi-backend

On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 3:35 PM, Abhishek Kekane wrote: > I'm asking for a Feature Freeze Exception for Multiple backend support > (multi-store) > feature [0]. The only remaining work is a versioning patch to flag this > feature as > experimental and should be completed early next week. > > [0]

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] FFE for multihash

On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 3:28 PM, Brian Rosmaita wrote: > I'm asking for a Feature Freeze Exception for the glance-side work for > the Secure Hash Algorithm Support (multihash) feature [0]. The work > is underway and should be completed early next week. > > cheers, > brian > > [0] >

[openstack-dev] [glance] FFE for multi-backend

I'm asking for a Feature Freeze Exception for Multiple backend support (multi-store) feature [0]. The only remaining work is a versioning patch to flag this feature as experimental and should be completed early next week. ​[0]

[openstack-dev] [glance] FFE for multihash

I'm asking for a Feature Freeze Exception for the glance-side work for the Secure Hash Algorithm Support (multihash) feature [0]. The work is underway and should be completed early next week. cheers, brian [0]

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance][glance_store] Functional testing of multiple backend

Hi Tomoki, Thank you for your efforts, I will check this out. Seems like with the patch you have mentioned multi store works with cinder as well. Thank you again. On Sat 30 Jun, 2018, 18:05 Tomoki Sekiyama, wrote: > Hi Abhishek, > > Thanks for your work. > I have added a way to configure

[openstack-dev] [glance][glance_store] Functional testing of multiple backend

Hi All, In Rocky I have proposed a spec [1] for adding support for multiple backend in glance. I have completed the coding part and so far tested this feature with file, rbd and swift store. However I need support in testing this feature thoroughly. So kindly help me (or provide a way to

[openstack-dev] [glance] bug smash today

Today (Friday, 8 June UTC time) is our Rocky-2 bug smash. Hang out in #openstack-glance and keep the etherpad updated: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/glance-rocky-bug-smash cheers, brian __ OpenStack Development Mailing

[openstack-dev] [glance] Rocky-2 milestone release

Status: glanceclient - released 2.11.1 today glance_store - one outstanding patch that would be worth including in the release: - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/534745/ (use only exceptions for uri validations) glance - two patches we should get in: - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/514114/

[openstack-dev] [Glance] Vancouver Summit Glance Dinner planning

Hi all, time to see if we could get the glance folks together for dinner and perhaps some refreshing beverages. If you are interested, please do contribute to the plans here: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/yvr-glance-dinner - jokke

[openstack-dev] [Glance] No team meeting during the summit week

As majority of the team is in Vancouver for the summit we will cancel next weeks meeting (24th of May). Glance team will have next meeting in IRC Thu 31st. Thanks, Erno "jokke" Kuvaja __ OpenStack Development Mailing List

[openstack-dev] [glance] Priorities for WC 16th of April

Hi all, Now when client release is out and milestone 1 is approaching quickly I'd like to draw your attention to few things in Glance development. 1) reviews of outstanding specs 2) work towards removal of the Images API v1 3) Pending delete rollback ability Lets get the reviews to specs so we

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] python-glanceclient release status

On Mon, Apr 2, 2018 at 6:28 PM, Brian Rosmaita wrote: > These need to be reviewed in master: > - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/50/ > - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/556292/ Thanks for the reviews. The requested changes have been made and Zuul has given a

[openstack-dev] [glance] python-glanceclient release status

These need to be reviewed in master: - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/50/ - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/556292/ Backports needing review: - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/555436/ __ OpenStack Development Mailing

[openstack-dev] [glance] Priorities for WC 26th of March

Hi all, Time for the priority update: The python-glanceclient release was postponed til this week due to some bugs Brian found and is in process of fixing. Lets review these and see what we need for the release, so we can get it out this week. The R-1 Milestone is approaching quickly so I would

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] python-glanceclient release status

Adding another review to the list: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/556292/ Also, https://review.openstack.org/50 has been updated with more tests. Once those are approved, they'll need to be backported to stable/queens so we can release 2.10.0 On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 8:55 PM, Brian

[openstack-dev] [glance] python-glanceclient release status

As promised at today's Glance meeting, here's an update on the release status for the glanceclient bugfix release for stable/queens. There's another bug I think needs to be addressed: https://bugs.launchpad.net/python-glanceclient/+bug/1758149 I've got a patch up so I can get feedback

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] New image backend: StorPool

Just updating the subject line tag to glance. ;) On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 05:33:30PM +0200, Peter Penchev wrote: > Hi, > > A couple of years ago I created a Nova spec for the StorPool image > backend: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/137830/ There was some > discussion, but then our company

[openstack-dev] [glance] bug squad meetings start Monday

The Glance Bug Squad will meet biweekly on Monday of even-numbered ISO weeks at 10:00 UTC in #openstack-glance. The meeting will last 45 minutes. The first meeting will be 19 March 2018. Agenda and notes: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/glance-bug-squad-meeting

[openstack-dev] [glance] OSSN-0076 brainstorming session Friday 16 March

I'm working on a spec to alleviate OSSN-0076 that would follow up the OSSN-0075 proposal [0], but have run into some problems. It would be helpful to lay them out and get some feedback. I'll be in the #openstack-glance channel at 16:30 UTC tomorrow (Friday) to discuss. Will take less than 1/2

[openstack-dev] [glance] Priorities for WC 12th of March

Hi all, Queens is released, we had good and productive PTG so lets get the ball rolling and start working through our Rocky priorities. This week I'd like the focus to be, as discussed in our weekly meeting at Thu, on python-glanceclient for 'web-download' import method and any specs that still

[openstack-dev] [glance] bi-weekly bug team meeting

To anyone interested in attending the bug team meetings: I'm proposing a 45 minute meeting every other week beginning the week of March 19. Time is 10:00 UTC (unless that turns out to be unworkable for everybody). Please indicate your preference for day of the week on this Doodle poll:

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Changes to Glance core team

On 01/03/18 12:09 +, Erno Kuvaja wrote: 2) Removing Flavio Percoco from Glance core. Flavio requested to be removed already couple of cycles ago and we did beg him to stick around to help with the Interoperable Image Import which of he has been integral part of designing since the very

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Changes to Glance core team

Thanks team - glad to be able to help out and I am hoping I can dig in more and be able to contribute where I can! Sean > On Mar 1, 2018, at 06:22, Abhishek Kekane wrote: > > Big +1 to Sean, he has been doing wonderful job for us. > Thank you, Flavio and Mike, hope to see

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Changes to Glance core team

Big +1 to Sean, he has been doing wonderful job for us. Thank you, Flavio and Mike, hope to see you back. Cheers, Abhishek On 01-Mar-2018 17:40, "Erno Kuvaja" wrote: > Hi all, > > At the start of the cycle is good time to have a look of the Glance > reviewers and based on

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Changes to Glance core team

+1 to all the above. Thanks for Flavio and Mike for all they've done for Glance, and looking forward to working more with Sean in the future. cheers, brian On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 7:09 AM, Erno Kuvaja wrote: > Hi all, > > At the start of the cycle is good time to have a look

[openstack-dev] [Glance] Changes to Glance core team

Hi all, At the start of the cycle is good time to have a look of the Glance reviewers and based on the discussions amongs the group during and before the PTG I'd like to propose following changes: 1) Adding Sean McGinnis to Glance core. The current active core team has been very positive about

[openstack-dev] [glance] priorities for the coming week (23 Feb - 1 March)

Hello Glancers, RC-3 was released today [0] and we expect it to be the final release candidate (unless someone finds a critical problem in the next 3 hours). Priority for this week is preparing for the PTG. If you can't attend, Erno has posted a topic list [1] you can look at. For topics

[openstack-dev] [glance] glance 16.0.0.0rc3 (queens)

Hello everyone, A new release candidate for glance for the end of the Queens cycle is available! You can find the source code tarball at: https://tarballs.openstack.org/glance/ Unless release-critical issues are found that warrant a release candidate respin, this candidate will be

[openstack-dev] [glance] priorities for the coming week (16 Feb - 21 Feb)

Hello Glancers, (1) Queens RC-2 was tagged Thursday (late Thursday night Pacific time, but Thursday nonetheless). A good place to concentrate testing effort is on the URI filtering feature of the web-download import method. Remember that if you build a devstack, set WSGI_MODE=mod_wsgi in your

[openstack-dev] [glance] glance 16.0.0.0rc2 (queens)

Hello everyone, A new release candidate for glance for the end of the Queens cycle is available! You can find the source code tarball at: https://tarballs.openstack.org/glance/ Unless release-critical issues are found that warrant a release candidate respin, this candidate will be

[openstack-dev] [glance] priorities for the coming week (9 Feb - 15 Feb)

Congratulations to Erno for his election as the Rocky PTL! Erno is taking over PTG planning, so don't forget to add ideas to the planning etherpad: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/glance-rocky-ptg-planning The first Release Candidate for the Queens edition of Glance was released today and the

[openstack-dev] [glance] glance 16.0.0.0rc1 (queens)

Hello everyone, A new release candidate for glance for the end of the Queens cycle is available! You can find the source code tarball at: https://tarballs.openstack.org/glance/ Unless release-critical issues are found that warrant a release candidate respin, this candidate will be

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance][cinder]Question about cinder as glance store

On 07/02, Erlon Cruz wrote: > That will depend on the Cinder/OS-brick iscsiadm versions right? Can you > tell what are the versions from where the problem was fixed? > > Erlon > Hi, Like you said it depends on your Cinder and OS-Brick versions, and the open-iscsi package will be different

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance][cinder]Question about cinder as glance store

Hello Gorka, Thank you for replying! I'll try to run glance-api and cinder-volume on the same node according to your information. On 2018/02/07 19:27, Gorka Eguileor wrote: On 07/02, Rikimaru Honjo wrote: Hello, I'm planning to use cinder as glance store. And, I'll setup cinder to connect

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance][cinder]Question about cinder as glance store

That will depend on the Cinder/OS-brick iscsiadm versions right? Can you tell what are the versions from where the problem was fixed? Erlon 2018-02-07 8:27 GMT-02:00 Gorka Eguileor : > On 07/02, Rikimaru Honjo wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I'm planning to use cinder as glance

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance][cinder]Question about cinder as glance store

On 07/02, Rikimaru Honjo wrote: > Hello, > > I'm planning to use cinder as glance store. > And, I'll setup cinder to connect storage by iSCSI multipath. > > In this case, can I run glance-api and cinder-volume on the same node? > > In my understanding, glance-api will attach a volume to own node

[openstack-dev] [glance][cinder]Question about cinder as glance store

Hello, I'm planning to use cinder as glance store. And, I'll setup cinder to connect storage by iSCSI multipath. In this case, can I run glance-api and cinder-volume on the same node? In my understanding, glance-api will attach a volume to own node and write a uploaded image to the volume if

[openstack-dev] [glance] glance-manage db check feature needs reviews

Hello Glancers, Please take a look at Bhagyashri's patch, which was given a FFE. There's a slight deviation from the spec, so I need feedback about whether this is acceptable (spoiler alert: I think it's OK). So please comment on that aspect of the patch even if you don't have time at the

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] FFE request for --check feature

Thanks for following up on this, Abhishek. After our discussion approving this at the weekly meeting, I completely forgot to send out an update. As Abhishek indicated, the discussion was positive, and this FFE is APPROVED. cheers, brian On Mon, Feb 5, 2018 at 3:56 AM, Abhishek Kekane

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] FFE request for --check feature

Sorry, Forgot to add meeting logs link in previous mail. Here it is; http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/glance/2018/glance.2018-02-01-14.01.log.html#l-164 Thank you, Abhishek Kekane On Mon, Feb 5, 2018 at 12:30 PM, Abhishek Kekane wrote: > We have discussed this in

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] FFE request for --check feature

We have discussed this in glance weekly meeting [1] and most of the core reviewers are inclined towards accepting this FFE. +1 from my side as this --check command will be very helpful for operators. Thank you Bhagyashri for working on this. Abhishek Kekane On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 7:29 PM,

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance][PTL] Nomination for Glance PTL for Rocky cycle

All the best Erno, Long may you reign ;) Abhishek On 31-Jan-2018 18:38, "Erno Kuvaja" wrote: > Hi all, > > After lengthy discussions and careful thinking I have thrown my name > into the hat for Glance PTL. You can find my thoughts from the > candidacy patch

[openstack-dev] [glance] FFE request for --check feature

Hi Glance Folks, I'm requesting an Feature Freeze Exception for the lite-spec http://specs.openstack.org/openstack/glance-specs/specs/untargeted/glance/lite-spec-db-sync-check.html which is implemented by https://review.openstack.org/#/c/455837/8/ Regards, Bhagyashri Shewale

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] Q-3 milestone released

On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 11:39 PM, Brian Rosmaita wrote: [snip] > Glance cores, please do not merge any patches until after > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/536630/ has merged. The patch merged at 08:15UTC today. Merge away (subject to common sense and the fact that

[openstack-dev] [Glance][PTL] Nomination for Glance PTL for Rocky cycle

Hi all, After lengthy discussions and careful thinking I have thrown my name into the hat for Glance PTL. You can find my thoughts from the candidacy patch https://review.openstack.org/#/c/539196/ I'd like to take the opportunity to thank most recently Brian but also our other former PTLs from

[openstack-dev] [glance] Q-3 milestone released

Glance 16.0.0.0b3 was released today, The tag was created at this commit: http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/glance/commit/?id=631add1ba849eac67ecb36ea4c90b57a300a96fa which is dated Thu, 18 Jan 2018 12:09:11 + As you'll notice, that was about 2 weeks ago. Which prompts the question,

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] PTL non-candidacy

On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 2:18 PM, Brian Rosmaita wrote: > I've been PTL of Glance through some rocky times, but have decided not > to stand for election for the Rocky cycle. My plan is to stick > around, attend to my duties as a glance core contributor, and support >

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] PTL non-candidacy

Excerpts from Brian Rosmaita's message of 2018-01-29 14:18:18 -0500: > I've been PTL of Glance through some rocky times, but have decided not > to stand for election for the Rocky cycle. My plan is to stick > around, attend to my duties as a glance core contributor, and support > my successor in

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] PTL non-candidacy

++ Thanks for leadership within Glance and everything else you've done in the community! -- Kevin Carter IRC: Cloudnull On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 1:27 PM, Sean McGinnis wrote: > On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 02:18:18PM -0500, Brian Rosmaita wrote: > > I've been PTL of Glance

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] PTL non-candidacy

Thanks so much for your remarkable work for glance for the couple of cycles. You have introduced very good processes like weekly priorities which helped community members to keep focused on priorities. It’s my pleasure to work with you, and yet I need to learn lot from you. Wish you all the best

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] PTL non-candidacy

On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 02:18:18PM -0500, Brian Rosmaita wrote: > I've been PTL of Glance through some rocky times, but have decided not > to stand for election for the Rocky cycle. My plan is to stick > around, attend to my duties as a glance core contributor, and support > my successor in

[openstack-dev] [glance] PTL non-candidacy

I've been PTL of Glance through some rocky times, but have decided not to stand for election for the Rocky cycle. My plan is to stick around, attend to my duties as a glance core contributor, and support my successor in whatever way I can to make for a smooth transition. After three consecutive

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] functional gate situation

Update on the 24 hours since the last update: tl;dr: glance cores, do not approve any substantial code changes until after the functional tests are restored. See below for details. On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 8:09 PM, Brian Rosmaita wrote: > Update on the last 24 hours:

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] py27 gate situation

Confirmed that no issue in loading the middleware, problem lies somewhere else. Still trying to figure it out. Thanks & Regards, Abhishek On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 4:00 PM, Abhishek Kekane wrote: > I have tried to debug this in my environment but so far not able to find >

[openstack-dev] [glance] functional gate situation

Update on the last 24 hours: (1) Sean's patch splitting the unit and functional tests in tox has merged. (2) My patch to restore the functional test gate jobs ran into a problem, namely, that one of the py35 tests suddenly begun failing in the gate, and I haven't been able to reproduce it

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] py27 gate situation

I have tried to debug this in my environment but so far not able to find the reason. While starting the api service from functional tests it fails to load middleware 'rootapp' from api-paste.ini What I have done is added below lines in tox.ini to enable debugging of functional tests

[openstack-dev] [glance] py27 gate situation

Looks like something changed in a distro dependency over the weekend and the glance py27 gate is failing. I did a dist-upgrade in a new Ubuntu 16.04.3 vm, and was able to reproduce the failures locally. I'll continue looking, but it's EOD where I am, so I wanted to make sure this info is

[openstack-dev] [glance] priorities for the coming week (18 Jan - 24 Jan)

As discussed at today's Glance meeting, the Q-3 milestone is next week. Please focus on the following: (1) image metadata injection https://review.openstack.org/#/c/527635/ (2) interoperable image import https://review.openstack.org/532502 https://review.openstack.org/532501 may be some more,

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance][oslo][requirements] [ironic]oslo.serialization fails with glance

On 18-01-17 21:24:12, John Villalovos wrote: > I have updated the bug with info I found out: > https://bugs.launchpad.net/oslo.serialization/+bug/1728368 > > Also I did a test patch with a proposed change: > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/535166/ > > This patch causes the unit tests to work. >

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance][oslo][requirements] [ironic]oslo.serialization fails with glance

I have updated the bug with info I found out: https://bugs.launchpad.net/oslo.serialization/+bug/1728368 Also I did a test patch with a proposed change: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/535166/ This patch causes the unit tests to work. As a note there is a deprecation warning in the current

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance][oslo][requirements] [ironic]oslo.serialization fails with glance

add Ironic team in the loop the revert patch got -1 from ironic folks , more details please see the comments in https://review.openstack.org/534736 The possible solution is to figure out why the change break Glance's unit test. which side should be fixed. 2018-01-17 20:14 GMT+08:00

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance][oslo][requirements] oslo.serialization fails with glance

On 18-01-16 19:12:16, ChangBo Guo wrote: > What's the issue for Glance, any bug link ? > > 2018-01-16 0:12 GMT+08:00 Matthew Thode : > > > On 18-01-13 00:41:28, Matthew Thode wrote: > > > https://review.openstack.org/531788 is the review we are seeing it in, > > > but

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance][oslo][requirements] oslo.serialization fails with glance

What's the issue for Glance, any bug link ? 2018-01-16 0:12 GMT+08:00 Matthew Thode : > On 18-01-13 00:41:28, Matthew Thode wrote: > > https://review.openstack.org/531788 is the review we are seeing it in, > > but 2.22.0 failed as well. > > > > I'm guessing it was

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance][oslo][requirements] oslo.serialization fails with glance

On 18-01-13 00:41:28, Matthew Thode wrote: > https://review.openstack.org/531788 is the review we are seeing it in, > but 2.22.0 failed as well. > > I'm guessing it was introduced in either > > https://github.com/openstack/oslo.serialization/commit/c1a7079c26d27a2e46cca26963d3d9aa040bdbe8 > or >

[openstack-dev] [glance][oslo][requirements] oslo.serialization fails with glance

https://review.openstack.org/531788 is the review we are seeing it in, but 2.22.0 failed as well. I'm guessing it was introduced in either https://github.com/openstack/oslo.serialization/commit/c1a7079c26d27a2e46cca26963d3d9aa040bdbe8 or

[openstack-dev] [glance] current priorities

Reminder: the Glance team has fewer than usual number of reviewers available until after the new year. The weekly Glance meeting is cancelled on Thursday, December 28. Here's what we're working on between now and the next Glance meeting on January 4, 2018: * Glanceclient We're aiming for a

[openstack-dev] [glance] priorities for the week (12/08-12/14)

Let's get the scrubber refactor and anything that got postponed from Q-2 merged before the meeting on Thursday. scrubber: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/510449/ (time zone bug has been addressed) others: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/524060/ https://review.openstack.org/#/c/521457/

[openstack-dev] [glance] priorities for the week (12/01-12/07)

Hello Glancers, As discussed at yesterday's Glance meeting, the priority for this week is getting ready for the release of the Q-2 milestone, so: 1. the scrubber refactor 2. bugs scheduled for Q-2 3. enhanced tests for interoperable image import ("IIR") I've put a list of patches and their

[openstack-dev] [Glance] No Team Meeting Today 23rd of Nov

Hi all, Due to the Thanks giving in US and as no agenda items were added by the deadline yesterday we will not have glance meeting today. Will recoup next week 30th of Nov. Thanks, Jokke __ OpenStack Development Mailing

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] nominating Nikhil Komawar for glance core

Thank you all for the support. I intend to help the Glance community flourish, again. cheers On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 10:07 AM, Brian Rosmaita wrote: > Having heard only positive responses, I'm happy to reinstate Nikhil > Komawar as a glance core, with all the

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] nominating Nikhil Komawar for glance core

Having heard only positive responses, I'm happy to reinstate Nikhil Komawar as a glance core, with all the rights and privileges pertaining thereto. Welcome back, Nikhil! cheers, brian On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 8:20 PM, Abhishek Kekane wrote: > Big +2 > Glad you are back :) >

[openstack-dev] [glance] priorities for the week (11/17-11/23)

Hello Glancers, Due to the Thanksgiving holidays in the USA next week, we are tentatively cancelling the meeting on November 23. However, most of our developers these days are outside the USA, so if someone has a pressing issue and puts the same on the meeting agenda before the usual deadline

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] nominating Nikhil Komawar for glance core

Big +2 Glad you are back :) Abhishek On 17-Nov-2017 4:59 AM, "Brian Rosmaita" wrote: > I'm sure I don't need to introduce Nikhil Komawar (nikhil in IRC), who > was Glance PTL for the Kilo, Liberty, and Newton releases and who was > a long time Glance core until he

[openstack-dev] [glance] nominating Nikhil Komawar for glance core

I'm sure I don't need to introduce Nikhil Komawar (nikhil in IRC), who was Glance PTL for the Kilo, Liberty, and Newton releases and who was a long time Glance core until he stepped down at the end of June this year. Nikhil has informed me that he now has time to do Glance code reviews again, and

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >