Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon] Logo

Let's take it before anybody else did :)! On Sat, Jul 16, 2016 at 6:15 PM Richard Jones wrote: > +2 very appropriate > > On 17 July 2016 at 11:01, Diana Whitten wrote: > >> Dunno if there have been any suggestions, but I'd like to suggest a

Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon] Logo

+2 very appropriate On 17 July 2016 at 11:01, Diana Whitten wrote: > Dunno if there have been any suggestions, but I'd like to suggest a Shiba > Inu for the Horizon logo mascot. > > If you unfamiliar with a Shiba Inu, take a look here: >

[openstack-dev] [horizon] Logo

Dunno if there have been any suggestions, but I'd like to suggest a Shiba Inu for the Horizon logo mascot. If you unfamiliar with a Shiba Inu, take a look here: http://vignette1.wikia.nocookie.net/sanicsource/images/9/97/Doge.jpg/revision/latest?cb=20160112233015 Our Shiba should definitely look

Re: [openstack-dev] [Horizon] Angular action services and initScope

dj0...@gmail.com> Reply-To: OpenStack List <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> Date: Friday, July 15, 2016 at 2:28 PM To: OpenStack List <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> Subject: [openstack-dev] [Horizon] Angular action services and initScope Hi folks, Something that's been bother

[openstack-dev] [Horizon] Angular action services and initScope

Hi folks, Something that's been bothering me for a while is that the action services break the encapsulation model of Angular Services - that they are singletons, and consumable by multiple simultaneous consumers without those consumers affecting each other through their use of the Service. At

[openstack-dev] [horizon] Next weeks meeting cancelled (2016-07-13)

Next weeks meeting is cancelled due to the midcycle. Meetings will resume as normal on the 20th of July. Rob __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe:

Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon] Keep / Remove 800 UTC Meeting time

There doesn't seem to have been any responses here, so I've gone ahead and proposed a patch to alter the meeting times: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/338130/ Rob On 30 June 2016 at 09:29, Rob Cresswell > wrote: Hi everyone,

[openstack-dev] [horizon] The bug list - how to use it, and how to triage

Hello! I just wanted to talk through Horizons bug list ( https://bugs.launchpad.net/horizon/ ), and how to use it to find issues you can help solve or review, as well as how to help triage bugs if you have time to help out. Using the bug list: - The "Tags" section on the right hand side is

[openstack-dev] [horizon] Keep / Remove 800 UTC Meeting time

Hi everyone, I've mentioned in the past few meetings that attendance for the 800 UTC meeting time has been dwindling. As it stands, there are really only 3 regular attendees (myself included). I think we should consider scrapping it, and just use the 2000 UTC slot each week as a combined

Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon] npm lint and test problems in gate

JFYI, CR [1] which fixes the corresponding bug [2] was merged on Jun 28, so it may make sense to recheck you perfectly looking commit if it has been staying in Gerrit for a while. [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/334582/ [2] https://bugs.launchpad.net/horizon/+bug/1595938 On Mon, Jun 27,

Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon] npm lint and test problems in gate

On 2016-06-24 22:08:40 + (+), Jeremy Stanley wrote: [...] > the gate-horizon-npm-run-test job uses that same configuration > (just passing a different {command}) and we're still seeing > failures registered for it even now. [...] Just following up since I got a few more minutes to poke at

[openstack-dev] [Horizon] xstatic publishing update - broken xstatic-angular-bootstrap

Hi folks, I released a couple of broken xstatic-angular-bootstrap packages to pypi yesterday - 0.11.0.4 and 0.11.0.5. There was to be an automated release of 0.11.0.6 through openstack-release, but I've abandoned that as it contained the same breakage. I've performed an emergency direct upload of

Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon] npm lint and test problems in gate

On 2016-06-24 19:12:01 + (+), Borland, Matt wrote: > It seems that the npm-run jobs are both passing Jenkins even when the tests > themselves fail. I'm not sure why that is, but Cores in particular: > > Please run "npm run lint && npm run test" before you +2 (or +1) anything. > This

[openstack-dev] [horizon] npm lint and test problems in gate

Horizoneers, It seems that the npm-run jobs are both passing Jenkins even when the tests themselves fail. I'm not sure why that is, but Cores in particular: Please run "npm run lint && npm run test" before you +2 (or +1) anything. This ensures that we don't pollute master with broken

[openstack-dev] [Horizon] New procedure for releasing xstatic packages

Hi folks, It's been a lng time coming, but we're almost there. I've put up a BP outlining the steps we need to get over the line and start releasing those looong awaited updates of our xstatic packages: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/horizon/+spec/xstatic-release-process I'll be

[openstack-dev] [horizon] 800 UTC Meeting Cancelled on 15/06

Hi all, I'm away next week so won't be able to run the 800 UTC meeting. The 2000 UTC meeting will be chaired by David Lyle. Rob __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe:

Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon] new stable-maint cores for Horizon

On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 08:27:29AM +0200, Matthias Runge wrote: > Horizoners, > > please join me to welcome > > * Richard Jones > * Rob Cresswell > * Thai Tran > > as new Horizon stable core reviewers. > > Thank you guys for stepping up and thank you tonyb for pulling stats and > pushing this.

[openstack-dev] [horizon] new stable-maint cores for Horizon

Horizoners, please join me to welcome * Richard Jones * Rob Cresswell * Thai Tran as new Horizon stable core reviewers. Thank you guys for stepping up and thank you tonyb for pulling stats and pushing this. Best, Matthias -- Matthias Runge Red Hat GmbH,

Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon] Horizon in devstack is broken, rechecks are futile

The final patch https://review.openstack.org/#/c/321640/ has just merged, Devstack Horizon is fully functional and integration tests should be passing from this moment. If any of your patches are still failing due to dsvm-integration job's multiple failures, please rebase them. On Fri, May 27,

Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon] Horizon in devstack is broken, rechecks are futile

On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 8:39 AM, Timur Sufiev wrote: > The root cause of Horizon issue has been identified and fixed at > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/321639/ > The next steps are to release new version of django-openstack-auth library > (which the above fix belongs

Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon] Horizon in devstack is broken, rechecks are futile

The root cause of Horizon issue has been identified and fixed at https://review.openstack.org/#/c/321639/ The next steps are to release new version of django-openstack-auth library (which the above fix belongs to), update global-requirements (if it's not automatic, I'm not very into the details of

[openstack-dev] [horizon] Horizon in devstack is broken, rechecks are futile

Dear Horizon contributors, The test job dsvm-integration fails for a reason for the last ~24 hours, please do not recheck your patches if you see that almost all integration tests fail (and only these tests) - it won't help. The fix for django_openstack_auth issue which has been uncovered by the

Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon] [antiddos] New project antiddos

Excerpts from adriano fialho araujo's message of 2016-05-20 11:45:09 -0300: > Hello, fellow developers! > > i need to create a new project to sell antiDDoS the horizon . what do you > recommend me as the first start of the project? > Does anyone know any documentation to start a project in django

[openstack-dev] [horizon] [antiddos] New project antiddos

Hello, fellow developers! i need to create a new project to sell antiDDoS the horizon . what do you recommend me as the first start of the project? Does anyone know any documentation to start a project in django on OpenStack standard. thank you

Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon] [javascript] Async file uploads in anew JS-centric UI

/2016 10:38 AM Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon] [javascript] Async file uploads in anew JS-centric UI Since 10 lines of code > 1000 words, here are references to 2 patch chains: * New Swift UI file upload https://review.openstack.org/#/c/316143/ * New Angular

Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon] [javascript] Async file uploads in a new JS-centric UI

Since 10 lines of code > 1000 words, here are references to 2 patch chains: * New Swift UI file upload https://review.openstack.org/#/c/316143/ * New Angular Create Image file upload https://review.openstack.org/#/c/317456/ I like Create Image solution more because it doesn't use Django

[openstack-dev] [horizon] Horizon Midcycle

Hi all, Horizon midcycle will be at Cisco HQ, Building 15 in San Jose, July 12th - 14th. Registration and topics etherpad: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Sprints/HorizonNewtonSprint Rob __ OpenStack Development Mailing

[openstack-dev] [horizon] [javascript] Async file uploads in a new JS-centric UI

Hello, fellow web developers! I'd like to share some of my thoughts and findings that I made during playing with ng-file-upload [1] for file uploads in Swift UI and Create Image wizard in Horizon (both Angular). Sorry for a long letter, couldn't put it shorter (TL;DR => go to CONCLUSION section).

Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon][keystone] Getting Auth Token from Horizon when using Federation

I flubbed my description of what I had in mind - I was thinking of GitHub personal access tokens as a model, _not_ OAuth tokens. I believe the normal excuse is "inadequate caffeine". From: dolph.math...@gmail.com Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon][keystone] Getting Auth Token fro

Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon][keystone] Getting Auth Token from Horizon when using Federation

On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 8:10 AM Edmund Rhudy (BLOOMBERG/ 120 PARK) < erh...@bloomberg.net> wrote: > +1 on desiring OAuth-style tokens in Keystone. > OAuth 1.0a has been supported by keystone since the havana release, you just have to turn it on and use it:

Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon][keystone] Getting Auth Token from Horizon when using Federation

-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon][keystone] Getting Auth Token from Horizon when using Federation Hi Dolph, On Mon, 2016-04-18 at 17:50 -0500, Dolph Mathews wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 11:34 AM, Martin Millnert <mar...@millnert.se &l

Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon][keystone] Getting Auth Token from Horizon when using Federation

to a private cloud is strange to people not steeped in cloudy things.) From: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon][keystone] Getting Auth Token from Horizon when using Federation Hi Dolph, On Mon, 2016-04-18 at 17:50 -0500, Dolph Mathews wrote: > > On Mo

Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon][keystone] Getting Auth Token from Horizon when using Federation

Hi Dolph, On Mon, 2016-04-18 at 17:50 -0500, Dolph Mathews wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 11:34 AM, Martin Millnert > wrote: > Hi, > > we're deploying Liberty (soon Mitaka) with heavy reliance on > the SAML2 > Federation system by

[openstack-dev] [horizon] Midcycle Dates Poll

Hi all, Quick poll to get a preferred date for the Newton midcycle: http://doodle.com/poll/xvchsbbs4qz9tzr7 If you'd like a reference point, the release schedule is here: http://releases.openstack.org/newton/schedule.html. Planning should be finalised within the next week, so please respond

[openstack-dev] [horizon] Feature Freeze one week earlier in Newton.

Hi all, As requested we’ll be moving our feature freeze in Newton to R-6 (http://releases.openstack.org/newton/schedule.html). This is one week earlier than in previous cycles, to give plugins a chance to finalise their own features for Newton without risk of breaking changes. The FFE process

Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon] Angular form framework

ilto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>> Date: Thursday, May 5, 2016 at 8:51 AM To: OpenStack List <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org<mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon] Angular form framework This feels like a thing for AngularJS projects only,

Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon] Angular form framework

This feels like a thing for AngularJS projects only, yes? What about projects like Fuel that use React? Michael On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 9:00 PM Tripp, Travis S wrote: > Hello everybody, > > I sent a message about this direclty to a couple of people for their quick >

[openstack-dev] [horizon] Angular form framework

Hello everybody, I sent a message about this direclty to a couple of people for their quick thoughts. It looks like there is enough interest that I should have just sent it to the whole ML from the start. I’d like to keep folks in the loop, so, I’m copying it all below with all of the

Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon][release] freeze timelines for horizon in newton

iday, April 29, 2016 4:28 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org<mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon][release] freeze timelines for horizon in newton This has been discussed (just now

Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon][release] freeze timelines for horizon in newton

From: Rob Cresswell (rcresswe) [mailto:rcres...@cisco.com] Sent: Friday, April 29, 2016 4:28 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon][release] freeze timelines for horizon in newton Th

Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon][release] freeze timelines for horizon in newton

This has been discussed (just now) in the release management plan (https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/newton-relmgt-plan) See point 8 under Communication/Governance Changes. From an immediate standpoint, the RC phase of this cycle will be much stricter to prevent late breakages. Going forward,

[openstack-dev] [horizon][release] freeze timelines for horizon in newton

In the Trove review of the release schedule this morning, and in the retrospective of the mitaka release process, one question which was raised was the linkage between projects like Trove and Horizon. This came up in the specific context of the fact that projects like Trove (in the form of the

Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon] How to paginate Data Table to display only 5 rows every page ?

Yes, you can maintain a downstream fork if you wish. On Thu, 28 Apr 2016 at 05:34, 严超 wrote: > Can we hard code only one table to 5 rows limit default ? And leave other > tables not touched. > Thank you very much ! > > 严超 于2016年4月28日周四 上午6:58写道： > >>

Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon] How to paginate Data Table to display only 5 rows every page ?

Can we hard code only one table to 5 rows limit default ? And leave other tables not touched. Thank you very much ! 严超 于2016年4月28日周四 上午6:58写道： > Oh, sorry, I mean, can we hard code only one table to 5 rows default ? And > leave others not touched. > Thank you very much ! >

Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon] How to paginate Data Table to display only 5 rows every page ?

Oh, sorry, I mean, can we hard code only one table to 5 rows default ? And leave others not touched. Thank you very much ! *Best Regards！* *Chao Yan--About me ： http://about.me/chao_yan * *My twitter： @yanchao727 * *My

Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon] How to paginate Data Table to display only 5 rows every page ?

Definitely, yes See how it's done for Images: https://github.com/openstack/horizon/blob/master/openstack_dashboard/dashboards/project/images/views.py#L35 Also, limit of items per table page is set in User Settings (->Settings at top right corner of the dashboard), it's not hard-coded. Once you

[openstack-dev] [horizon] How to paginate Data Table to display only 5 rows every page ?

Hi, Everyone: Is there a possible way to paginate DataTable to display only 5 rows every page ? I'm very grateful for reply. *Best Regards！* *Chao Yan--About me ： http://about.me/chao_yan * *My twitter： @yanchao727 *

[openstack-dev] [horizon] Summit next week - Meetings cancelled

Hi all, Due to the summit next week, both of the usual Wednesday meetings are cancelled. Rob __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe:

Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon][keystone] Getting Auth Token from Horizon when using Federation

On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 10:22:46AM -0400, John Dennis wrote: > On 04/18/2016 12:34 PM, Martin Millnert wrote: > >(** ECP is a new feature, not supported by all IdP's, that at (second) > >best requires reconfiguration of core authentication services at each > >customer, and at worst requires

Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon][keystone] Getting Auth Token from Horizon when using Federation

On 04/18/2016 12:34 PM, Martin Millnert wrote: (** ECP is a new feature, not supported by all IdP's, that at (second) best requires reconfiguration of core authentication services at each customer, and at worst requires customers to change IdP software completely. This is a varying degree of

[openstack-dev] [horizon][designate] : Facing problem in integrating Designate-Dashboard plugin on Horizon

Hi All, I have tried steps 1-2 from  https://github.com/openstack/designate-dashboard/blob/master/README.rst and also declared designate-dashboard in the horizon settings files as given on  https://github.com/openstack/designate-dashboard/tree/stable/liberty#howto  (step 2). Still, on devstack,

Re: [openstack-dev] [Horizon][stable] proposing Rob Cresswell for Horizon stable core

On 4/12/2016 5:06 AM, Matthias Runge wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 12/04/16 05:12, Tony Breeds wrote: On Thu, Apr 07, 2016 at 12:01:31PM +0200, Matthias Runge wrote: Hello, I'm proposing Rob Cresswell to become stable core for Horizon. I thought, in the past all

Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon] Can we have multiple tab groups in one page?

That would be too complicated using current Django-based tabs and tables. You could either split Zone1 and Zone2 to separate panels or look towards new Angular-based facilities. On Tue, 19 Apr 2016 at 10:59, 严超 wrote: > Something like this GUI, two tab_group_class needed.

Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon] Can we have multiple tab groups in one page?

Something like this GUI, two tab_group_class needed. Each tab contains a couple of tables. [image: 内嵌图片 1] *Best Regards！* *Chao Yan--About me ： http://about.me/chao_yan * *My twitter： @yanchao727 * *My Weibo：

Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon] Can we have multiple tab groups in one page?

Horizon is moving away from showing more than one table on the same page/tab, because it doesn't work well with pagination. So it's better to reorganize your data to be coherent with how tabs work. By the way, do you have a wireframe displaying how the overall picture should look like? I suspect

Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon] Can we have multiple tab groups in one page?

Because I may need two groups of tables to display, each of the group may contain 5 or 6 tables. Is there any workaround for this case? Thank you very much for your replay. *Best Regards！* *Chao Yan--About me ： http://about.me/chao_yan * *My twitter：

Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon] Can we have multiple tab groups in one page?

Hello! Judging by https://github.com/openstack/horizon/blob/master/horizon/tabs/views.py#L44 it wasn't designed to have more than 1 class. Why do you need it? On Tue, 19 Apr 2016 at 06:32, 严超 wrote: > HI, Everyone: > Document says : > .. attribute::

[openstack-dev] [horizon] Can we have multiple tab groups in one page?

HI, Everyone: Document says : .. attribute:: tab_group_class The only required attribute for ``TabView``. It should be a class which inherits from :class:`horizon.tabs.TabGroup`. """ Can we have multiple tab groups in one page? Seems

Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon] Set CSS style for each cell in Datatable according to the value

Thank you ! That works for me ! *Best Regards！* *Chao Yan--About me ： http://about.me/chao_yan * *My twitter： @yanchao727 * *My Weibo： http://weibo.com/herewearenow * *--*

Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon][keystone] Getting Auth Token from Horizon when using Federation

On 04/18/2016 12:34 PM, Martin Millnert wrote: Hi, we're deploying Liberty (soon Mitaka) with heavy reliance on the SAML2 Federation system by Keystone where we're a Service Provider (SP). The problem in this situation is getting a token for direct API access.(*) There are conceptually two

Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon][keystone] Getting Auth Token from Horizon when using Federation

On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 11:34 AM, Martin Millnert wrote: > Hi, > > we're deploying Liberty (soon Mitaka) with heavy reliance on the SAML2 > Federation system by Keystone where we're a Service Provider (SP). > > The problem in this situation is getting a token for direct API >

[openstack-dev] [horizon][keystone] Getting Auth Token from Horizon when using Federation

Hi, we're deploying Liberty (soon Mitaka) with heavy reliance on the SAML2 Federation system by Keystone where we're a Service Provider (SP). The problem in this situation is getting a token for direct API access.(*) There are conceptually two methods to use the CLI: 1) Modify ones (each

Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon] Set CSS style for each cell in Datatable according to the value

Can you be more explicit ? How should we overwrite the Cell Class of Horizon ? Is there a best practice ? Or example at hand ? Seems that is not easy for me and, it's the only choice here for that case? Thank you very mush for your reply ! *Best Regards！* *Chao Yan--About me ：

[openstack-dev] [horizon] Set CSS style for each cell in Datatable according to the value

Hi, Everyone:Is there a possible way to set CSS style for* each cell* in *DataTable* according to the value of the cell ? For example, if the cell value is *'available' *then the css should display a *green icon* as well, else if the cell value is *'error'* the the css should display a *red

Re: [openstack-dev] [Horizon][stable] proposing Rob Cresswell for Horizon stable core

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 12/04/16 05:12, Tony Breeds wrote: > On Thu, Apr 07, 2016 at 12:01:31PM +0200, Matthias Runge wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I'm proposing Rob Cresswell to become stable core for Horizon. I >> thought, in the past all PTL were in stable team, but this

Re: [openstack-dev] [Horizon][stable] proposing Rob Cresswell for Horizon stable core

On Thu, Apr 07, 2016 at 12:01:31PM +0200, Matthias Runge wrote: > Hello, > > I'm proposing Rob Cresswell to become stable core for Horizon. I > thought, in the past all PTL were in stable team, but this doesn't seem > to be true any more. This *may* have been true when the project specific team

Re: [openstack-dev] [Horizon][stable] proposing Rob Cresswell for Horizon stable core

t;OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" >> <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> >> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Horizon][stable] proposing Rob Cresswell for >> Horizon stable core >> >> +1 >> Чт, 7 апр. 2016 г. в 14:04, Itxaka

Re: [openstack-dev] [Horizon][Keystone]Re: Keystone 'adminURL' option to fallback to 'internalURL' within Horizon api/keystone.py?

You can use the public URL as a fallback to the internal URL; however, the admin URL is assumed to be the only privileged API endpoint. The details are buried in API documentation (and perhaps history), but I tried to summarize the intended design here as I understand it:

[openstack-dev] [horizon] 1200 UTC meeting changed to 800 UTC

Hi all, The 1200 UTC meeting time has been changed to 800 UTC. You can find the ICS files for the team meetings and drivers meetings in the links below. http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/#Horizon_Team_Meeting http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/#Horizon_Drivers_Meeting Rob

Re: [openstack-dev] [Horizon][stable] proposing Rob Cresswell for Horizon stable core

Mailing List (not for usage questions)" < > openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> > Date: Thursday, April 7, 2016 at 4:31 AM > To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" < > openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Horiz

Re: [openstack-dev] [Horizon][Keystone]Re: Keystone 'adminURL' option to fallback to 'internalURL' within Horizon api/keystone.py?

Hi, I think Brad's spot on. See inline, but short version - the special case is only required if the KS catalog returns v2.0 endpoints. On 4/7/16, 1:39 PM, "Brad Pokorny" wrote: >Hi Brian, > >Copying to the general list, as this is something I've wondered about, and

[openstack-dev] [Horizon][app-catalog] Discussions in Austin

Greetings Horizon team! We'd like to find time at the design summit to cover a few of the things that impact both Horizon and the Community App Catalog. I think many of these topics will be of interest to other teams working on plugins using angular as well. If you've already got these on your

[openstack-dev] [Horizon][Keystone]Re: Keystone 'adminURL' option to fallback to 'internalURL' within Horizon api/keystone.py?

Hi Brian, Copying to the general list, as this is something I've wondered about, and others probably are as well. Please see below. I'm not an expert on this topic, but I've looked at it a little bit. On 4/7/16, 11:02 AM, "Tully, Brian" wrote: >Hi there - > >I'm reaching

Re: [openstack-dev] [Horizon][stable] proposing Rob Cresswell for Horizon stable core

v@lists.openstack.org>> Date: Thursday, April 7, 2016 at 4:31 AM To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org<mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Horizon][stable] proposing Rob Cre

Re: [openstack-dev] [Horizon][stable] proposing Rob Cresswell for Horizon stable core

+1 Чт, 7 апр. 2016 г. в 14:04, Itxaka Serrano Garcia : > Im still not sure if non-cores (i.e. peasants like me) can vote but I > will do it anyway :D > > A big +1 from me. > > Itxaka > > On 04/07/2016 12:01 PM, Matthias Runge wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I'm proposing Rob

Re: [openstack-dev] [Horizon][stable] proposing Rob Cresswell for Horizon stable core

Im still not sure if non-cores (i.e. peasants like me) can vote but I will do it anyway :D A big +1 from me. Itxaka On 04/07/2016 12:01 PM, Matthias Runge wrote: Hello, I'm proposing Rob Cresswell to become stable core for Horizon. I thought, in the past all PTL were in stable team, but

[openstack-dev] [Horizon][stable] proposing Rob Cresswell for Horizon stable core

Hello, I'm proposing Rob Cresswell to become stable core for Horizon. I thought, in the past all PTL were in stable team, but this doesn't seem to be true any more. Please chime in with +1/-1 -- Matthias Runge Red Hat GmbH, http://www.de.redhat.com/, Registered seat:

Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon] - oAuth tab proposal

iling List (not for usage questions)" <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org <mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon] - oAuth tab proposal Could you put up a blueprint for discussion? We have a weekly meeting to review blueprints: https

Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon] - oAuth tab proposal

Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> Date: 2016/04/06 03:23 PM Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon] - oAuth tab proposal The last I heard, oauth is likely to be deprecated in Keystone [1]. If you're interested in

Re: [openstack-dev] [Horizon][Searchlight] Plans for Horizon cross-region view

Stack List ><openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org<mailto:openstack-...@lists.openstack.or >g>> >Subject: [openstack-dev] [Horizon][Searchlight] Plans for Horizon >cross-region view > >The last info I've found on the ML about a cross-region view in Horizon >is [1], which

Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon] - oAuth tab proposal

, 2016 at 8:31 AM To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org<mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon] - oAuth tab proposal Could you put up a blueprint for discussion? We have

Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon][neutron] LB/FW on network topology

Hi, # subject should be more specific. There is no reason to implement them. Unfortunately there is no contribution so far :) This is the list for developers. Do you want to implement them? 2016-04-06 15:37 GMT+09:00 李戈 : > HI, > I am a openstack user. But when I use

[openstack-dev] [horizon][neutron]

HI, I am a openstack user. But when I use load balance and firewall service, I found there is no icon in network topology with balance and firewall. So I want to know that the reason is the "lb fw icon" is in to-do list or others?

Re: [openstack-dev] [Horizon][Searchlight] Plans for Horizon cross-region view

t;mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>> Date: Thursday, February 25, 2016 at 3:17 PM To: OpenStack List <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org<mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>> Subject: [openstack-dev] [Horizon][Searchlight] Plans for Horizon cross-region view The

[openstack-dev] [horizon] mitaka mid-cycle report

Hello everybody, I know this is a bit late, but I just now came across a blog that our very own Cindy Lu wrote about the Mitaka Horizon mid-cycle. It looks to me as though this never made it out to the mailing list. So, I just wanted to send it along to the ML. Thanks, Cindy!

Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon][all] How to properly depend on Horizon

> On Apr 4, 2016, at 3:32 PM, Rob Cresswell > wrote: > > When you refer to publishing horizon on PyPI, did you mean the entire service > (horizon + openstack_dashboard), or just the horizon package? > > My advice would be to add the horizon tarball to

Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon][all] How to properly depend on Horizon

When you refer to publishing horizon on PyPI, did you mean the entire service (horizon + openstack_dashboard), or just the horizon package? My advice would be to add the horizon tarball to requirements.txt rather than test-requirements, and just use stable-* tarball when creating stable plugin

Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon][all] How to properly depend on Horizon

>I agree the simplest way is to publish horizon to PyPI, but the OpenStack does >not release server projects to PyPI yet. Problem is that openstack/horizon is actually two things in one repo: * OpenStack Dashboard which is server project * Horizon which is library In this case I would say that

Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon][all] How to properly depend on Horizon

Hi Serg, I proposed another way to sahara-dashboard [1]. This is the way used in neutron sub-projects. It also allows us to use constrained environments used in OpenStack gate jobs. I believe it works for all horizon related projects. I agree the simplest way is to publish horizon to PyPI, but

[openstack-dev] [horizon][all] How to properly depend on Horizon

Hi folks, while I was working on bug [0] with incorrect dependency to horizon in stable/mitaka I discovered at least three different ways how people add such dependency: 1. tarball dependency in tox.ini [1] 2. tarball dependency in test-requirements.txt [2] 3. git repo dependency in

[openstack-dev] [horizon][mitaka][all] Update dependency to horizon for stable/mitaka

Hi folks, I've noticed that several projects which have dashboard which depend on horizon reference incorrect version [0]: * designate-dashboard * mistral-dashboard * murano-dashboard (fix proposed) * manila-ui * ironic-ui * searchlight-ui * magnum-ui * monasca-ui all these projects, and some

Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon] - oAuth tab proposal

Could you put up a blueprint for discussion? We have a weekly meeting to review blueprints: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/HorizonDrivers The blueprint template is here: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/horizon/+spec/template Thanks! Rob On 31 Mar 2016, at 10:57, Marcos Fermin Lobo

[openstack-dev] [horizon] - oAuth tab proposal

Hi all, I would like to propose a new tab in "Access and security" web page. As you know, keystone offers an OAUTH plugin for authentication. This means that third party applications could access to OpenStack cloud resources using OAUTH. Now, this is possible using the CLI but there is nothing

Re: [openstack-dev] [Horizon] How to add plugins from outside horizon tree

http://docs.openstack.org/developer/horizon/tutorials/plugin.html This should answer most questions about setting up and installing a plugin. Hope it helps! Rob On 28 Mar 2016, at 18:33, Mohan Kumar > wrote: Hi Team , Could you

[openstack-dev] [Horizon] How to add plugins from outside horizon tree

Hi Team , Could you please shed light on some steps /configuration/documentation about how to add Horizon plugins from outside horizon tree . I can see punch of plugins were developed at " http://docs.openstack.org/developer/horizon/plugins.html " but couldn't able to any documentation .

[openstack-dev] [Horizon] Bug day

Bug day returns! Everyone welcome! We've had some success but still a long way to go. The next bug day will be on the 5th of April. The focus of the bug days is to triage our existing bugs, not to fix specific bugs or find new ones (for now). In the future, as the list progresses to an

[openstack-dev] [Horizon] Horizon Drivers meeting

Hi folks, With master now open for Newton development, I'm going to reopen the Horizon Drivers meeting. See https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/HorizonDrivers I intend to run the meeting both weeks for now (previously we had only held it every other week). The next meeting will be at

Re: [openstack-dev] [Horizon] How do we move forward with xstatic releases?

Thanks, Christopher (and the app-catalog team). On 21 March 2016 at 08:35, Christopher Aedo wrote: > On Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 1:26 PM, Richard Jones > wrote: > > Unfortunately none of this discussion solves the substantive issue which > is > > that we

[openstack-dev] [horizon] A big thanks to the Horizon team for their support (Django 1.9 support needed for Debian)

Hi there! The Horizon team really went out of their boundaries to help adding support for Django 1.9, which was required for the upload to Debian. Apart from Debian, no other distro needed the support just yet, but they made it happen on time, just after the RC1 (which is fine, I'm adding the

Re: [openstack-dev] [Horizon] How do we move forward with xstatic releases?

On Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 1:26 PM, Richard Jones wrote: > Unfortunately none of this discussion solves the substantive issue which is > that we cannot release an xstatic package without breaking the gate. > > We currently have one solution that's a close to viable as we've

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >