no
quota necessary for this operation.
>
> -- Original --
> *From: * "Brian Rosmaita";
> *Date: * Mon, Nov 19, 2018 10:26 PM
> *To: * "OpenStack Developmen";
> *Subject: * Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] about use shared image with
>
2018 10:26 PM
To: "OpenStack Developmen";
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] about use shared image with each other
On 11/19/18 7:58 AM, Rambo wrote:
> Hi,all
>
> Recently, I want to use the shared image with each other.I find it
> isn't convenient that the pr
On 11/19/18 7:58 AM, Rambo wrote:
> Hi,all
>
> Recently, I want to use the shared image with each other.I find it
> isn't convenient that the producer notifies the consumer via email which
> the image has been shared and what its UUID is. In other words, why the
> image api v2 is no
Hi,all
Recently, I want to use the shared image with each other.I find it isn't
convenient that the producer notifies the consumer via email which the image
has been shared and what its UUID is. In other words, why the image api v2 is
no provision for producer-consumer communication?
Greetings, Glance team!
As you may be aware, I've been working with other folks in the community
on documenting a vision for OpenStack clouds (formerly known as the
'Technical Vision') - essentially to interpret the mission statement in
long-form, in a way that we can use to actually help
Hello Glancers,
I was looking at a Cinder patch [0] and it made me realize that we
should do a glanceclient release that includes the
multihash-download-verification [1] before the next scheduled Stein
release (which was to be 3.0.0, basically Rocky with v1 support removed;
see [2]). I think it
I haven't implemented any checks, but I did take a shot at laying down the
scaffolding for implementing upgrade checks in glance [0].
Anyone who is more familiar with glance should be able to build off of that
commit by implementing specific checks in glance/cmd/status.py
[0]
On 9/24/18 3:13 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote:
> On 9/24/2018 2:06 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote:
>> Are there more specific docs about how to configure the 'image import'
>> feature so that I can be sure I'm careful? In other words, are there
>> specific things a "glance-status upgrade check" check could
I put together an etherpad outlining the changes to Iain's spec-lite
[0] that we discussed at today's glance meeting:
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/glance-spec-lite-stein-locations-with-checksum
It's probably best to leave comments on the etherpad.
cheers,
brian
[0]
;openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org" <
> openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>
> *Subject: *Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] Glance API Caching Enhancements
> for Edge Computing
>
>
>
> Hi Greg,
>
>
>
> Have you actually filed a blueprint or specs for this in glance?
k.org"
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] Glance API Caching Enhancements for Edge
Computing
Hi Greg,
Have you actually filed a blueprint or specs for this in glance?
If yes could you please provide a reference for the same.
Thanks & Best Regards,
Abhishek Kekane
On Thu, Oct 4,
Hi Greg,
Have you actually filed a blueprint or specs for this in glance?
If yes could you please provide a reference for the same.
Thanks & Best Regards,
Abhishek Kekane
On Thu, Oct 4, 2018 at 12:34 AM Waines, Greg
wrote:
> Glance Team,
>
>
>
> I am following up on discussions in the
Glance Team,
I am following up on discussions in the edge-computing PTG meetings.
There were discussions on potential enhancements to Glance API Caching for
support of the proposed MVP Edge Architecture.
And I took the action to write up a blueprint and a specification for these
enhancements
On 9/24/2018 2:06 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote:
Are there more specific docs about how to configure the 'image import'
feature so that I can be sure I'm careful? In other words, are there
specific things a "glance-status upgrade check" check could look at and
say, "your image import configuration
Looking at the upgrade-checkers goal [1] for glance and the Rocky
upgrade release notes [2], one upgrade note says:
"As Image Import will be always enabled, care needs to be taken that it
is configured properly from this release forward. The
‘enable_image_import’ option is silently ignored."
I feel like I've been chasing this issue around in circles for months,
and I need the core team to make a decision. I cannot proceed with
Rocky deployment/upgrade until this gets resolved.
It's currently possible to add to, or completely replace, the
"locations" for an image with status "queued",
On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 5:41 PM Ildiko Vancsa
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The PTG is approaching quickly and as we are planning a couple of joint
> sessions on edge computing with a couple of OpenStack project teams I would
> like to give a quick summary of the plans.
>
> We have the Edge Computing Group
Hi,
The PTG is approaching quickly and as we are planning a couple of joint
sessions on edge computing with a couple of OpenStack project teams I would
like to give a quick summary of the plans.
We have the Edge Computing Group meeting all day Tuesday in Ballroom A[1] from
9am MDT. The group
Hi all,
PTG is approaching fast and I'm pretty much offline this week for
holidays so will cancel the two next meetings.
We will get together over Wed to Fri in the PTG and have next Glance
weekly meeting the week after.
Safe travels everyone and I'm looking forward to see as many of ye as
Hi again Andy,
Thanks for the update. Sounds like there is some work to do in various
client libraries first.
I also just tried to launch a Sahara cluster against a community
image-- it failed, because our current validation wants the image ID
to actually appear in the image list. So there will
Hi Jeremy,
> Can you comment more on what needs to be updated in Sahara? Are they
> simply issues in the UI (sahara-dashboard) or is there a problem
> consuming community images on the server side?
We haven't looked into it much yet, so I couldn't tell you.
I think it would be great to extend
Hi Andy,
Can you comment more on what needs to be updated in Sahara? Are they
simply issues in the UI (sahara-dashboard) or is there a problem
consuming community images on the server side?
I'm happy to pitch in, just would like to do it efficiently.
Thanks,
Jeremy
On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 5:31
On 08/22/2018 04:31 PM, Andy Botting wrote:
Hi all,
We've recently moved to using Glance's community visibility on the
Nectar Research Cloud. We had lots of public images (12255), and we
found it was becoming slow to list them all and the community image
visibility seems to fit our use-case
Hi all,
We've recently moved to using Glance's community visibility on the Nectar
Research Cloud. We had lots of public images (12255), and we found it was
becoming slow to list them all and the community image visibility seems to
fit our use-case nicely.
We moved all of our user's images over
Hello everyone,
A new release candidate for glance for the end of the Rocky
cycle is available! You can find the source code tarball at:
https://tarballs.openstack.org/glance/
Unless release-critical issues are found that warrant a release
candidate respin, this candidate will be formally
Hello everyone,
A new release candidate for glance for the end of the Rocky
cycle is available! You can find the source code tarball at:
https://tarballs.openstack.org/glance/
Unless release-critical issues are found that warrant a release
candidate respin, this candidate will be formally
On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 3:35 PM, Abhishek Kekane wrote:
> I'm asking for a Feature Freeze Exception for Multiple backend support
> (multi-store)
> feature [0]. The only remaining work is a versioning patch to flag this
> feature as
> experimental and should be completed early next week.
>
> [0]
On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 3:28 PM, Brian Rosmaita
wrote:
> I'm asking for a Feature Freeze Exception for the glance-side work for
> the Secure Hash Algorithm Support (multihash) feature [0]. The work
> is underway and should be completed early next week.
>
> cheers,
> brian
>
> [0]
>
I'm asking for a Feature Freeze Exception for Multiple backend support
(multi-store)
feature [0]. The only remaining work is a versioning patch to flag
this feature as
experimental and should be completed early next week.
[0]
I'm asking for a Feature Freeze Exception for the glance-side work for
the Secure Hash Algorithm Support (multihash) feature [0]. The work
is underway and should be completed early next week.
cheers,
brian
[0]
Hi Tomoki,
Thank you for your efforts, I will check this out. Seems like with the
patch you have mentioned multi store works with cinder as well.
Thank you again.
On Sat 30 Jun, 2018, 18:05 Tomoki Sekiyama,
wrote:
> Hi Abhishek,
>
> Thanks for your work.
> I have added a way to configure
Hi All,
In Rocky I have proposed a spec [1] for adding support for multiple backend
in glance. I have completed the coding part and so far tested this feature
with file, rbd and swift store. However I need support in testing this
feature thoroughly. So kindly help me (or provide a way to
Today (Friday, 8 June UTC time) is our Rocky-2 bug smash. Hang out in
#openstack-glance and keep the etherpad updated:
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/glance-rocky-bug-smash
cheers,
brian
__
OpenStack Development Mailing
Status:
glanceclient - released 2.11.1 today
glance_store - one outstanding patch that would be worth including in
the release:
- https://review.openstack.org/#/c/534745/ (use only exceptions for
uri validations)
glance - two patches we should get in:
- https://review.openstack.org/#/c/514114/
Hi all,
time to see if we could get the glance folks together for dinner and
perhaps some refreshing beverages. If you are interested, please do
contribute to the plans here:
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/yvr-glance-dinner
- jokke
As majority of the team is in Vancouver for the summit we will cancel
next weeks meeting (24th of May). Glance team will have next meeting
in IRC Thu 31st.
Thanks,
Erno "jokke" Kuvaja
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List
Hi all,
Now when client release is out and milestone 1 is approaching quickly
I'd like to draw your attention to few things in Glance development.
1) reviews of outstanding specs
2) work towards removal of the Images API v1
3) Pending delete rollback ability
Lets get the reviews to specs so we
On Mon, Apr 2, 2018 at 6:28 PM, Brian Rosmaita
wrote:
> These need to be reviewed in master:
> - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/50/
> - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/556292/
Thanks for the reviews. The requested changes have been made and Zuul
has given a
These need to be reviewed in master:
- https://review.openstack.org/#/c/50/
- https://review.openstack.org/#/c/556292/
Backports needing review:
- https://review.openstack.org/#/c/555436/
__
OpenStack Development Mailing
Hi all,
Time for the priority update:
The python-glanceclient release was postponed til this week due to
some bugs Brian found and is in process of fixing. Lets review these
and see what we need for the release, so we can get it out this week.
The R-1 Milestone is approaching quickly so I would
Adding another review to the list:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/556292/
Also, https://review.openstack.org/50 has been updated with more tests.
Once those are approved, they'll need to be backported to
stable/queens so we can release 2.10.0
On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 8:55 PM, Brian
As promised at today's Glance meeting, here's an update on the release
status for the glanceclient bugfix release for stable/queens.
There's another bug I think needs to be addressed:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/python-glanceclient/+bug/1758149
I've got a patch up so I can get feedback
Just updating the subject line tag to glance. ;)
On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 05:33:30PM +0200, Peter Penchev wrote:
> Hi,
>
> A couple of years ago I created a Nova spec for the StorPool image
> backend: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/137830/ There was some
> discussion, but then our company
The Glance Bug Squad will meet biweekly on Monday of even-numbered ISO
weeks at 10:00 UTC in #openstack-glance. The meeting will last 45
minutes.
The first meeting will be 19 March 2018.
Agenda and notes: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/glance-bug-squad-meeting
I'm working on a spec to alleviate OSSN-0076 that would follow up the
OSSN-0075 proposal [0], but have run into some problems. It would be
helpful to lay them out and get some feedback. I'll be in the
#openstack-glance channel at 16:30 UTC tomorrow (Friday) to discuss.
Will take less than 1/2
Hi all,
Queens is released, we had good and productive PTG so lets get the
ball rolling and start working through our Rocky priorities.
This week I'd like the focus to be, as discussed in our weekly meeting
at Thu, on python-glanceclient for 'web-download' import method and
any specs that still
To anyone interested in attending the bug team meetings:
I'm proposing a 45 minute meeting every other week beginning the week
of March 19. Time is 10:00 UTC (unless that turns out to be
unworkable for everybody). Please indicate your preference for day of
the week on this Doodle poll:
On 01/03/18 12:09 +, Erno Kuvaja wrote:
2) Removing Flavio Percoco from Glance core. Flavio requested to be
removed already couple of cycles ago and we did beg him to stick
around to help with the Interoperable Image Import which of he has
been integral part of designing since the very
Thanks team - glad to be able to help out and I am hoping I can dig in more
and be able to contribute where I can!
Sean
> On Mar 1, 2018, at 06:22, Abhishek Kekane wrote:
>
> Big +1 to Sean, he has been doing wonderful job for us.
> Thank you, Flavio and Mike, hope to see
Big +1 to Sean, he has been doing wonderful job for us.
Thank you, Flavio and Mike, hope to see you back.
Cheers,
Abhishek
On 01-Mar-2018 17:40, "Erno Kuvaja" wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> At the start of the cycle is good time to have a look of the Glance
> reviewers and based on
+1 to all the above.
Thanks for Flavio and Mike for all they've done for Glance, and
looking forward to working more with Sean in the future.
cheers,
brian
On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 7:09 AM, Erno Kuvaja wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> At the start of the cycle is good time to have a look
Hi all,
At the start of the cycle is good time to have a look of the Glance
reviewers and based on the discussions amongs the group during and
before the PTG I'd like to propose following changes:
1) Adding Sean McGinnis to Glance core. The current active core team
has been very positive about
Hello Glancers,
RC-3 was released today [0] and we expect it to be the final release
candidate (unless someone finds a critical problem in the next 3
hours).
Priority for this week is preparing for the PTG. If you can't attend,
Erno has posted a topic list [1] you can look at. For topics
Hello everyone,
A new release candidate for glance for the end of the Queens
cycle is available! You can find the source code tarball at:
https://tarballs.openstack.org/glance/
Unless release-critical issues are found that warrant a release
candidate respin, this candidate will be
Hello Glancers,
(1) Queens RC-2 was tagged Thursday (late Thursday night Pacific
time, but Thursday nonetheless). A good place to concentrate testing
effort is on the URI filtering feature of the web-download import
method. Remember that if you build a devstack, set WSGI_MODE=mod_wsgi
in your
Hello everyone,
A new release candidate for glance for the end of the Queens
cycle is available! You can find the source code tarball at:
https://tarballs.openstack.org/glance/
Unless release-critical issues are found that warrant a release
candidate respin, this candidate will be
Congratulations to Erno for his election as the Rocky PTL! Erno is
taking over PTG planning, so don't forget to add ideas to the planning
etherpad:
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/glance-rocky-ptg-planning
The first Release Candidate for the Queens edition of Glance was
released today and the
Hello everyone,
A new release candidate for glance for the end of the Queens
cycle is available! You can find the source code tarball at:
https://tarballs.openstack.org/glance/
Unless release-critical issues are found that warrant a release
candidate respin, this candidate will be
On 07/02, Erlon Cruz wrote:
> That will depend on the Cinder/OS-brick iscsiadm versions right? Can you
> tell what are the versions from where the problem was fixed?
>
> Erlon
>
Hi,
Like you said it depends on your Cinder and OS-Brick versions, and the
open-iscsi package will be different
Hello Gorka,
Thank you for replying!
I'll try to run glance-api and cinder-volume on the same node
according to your information.
On 2018/02/07 19:27, Gorka Eguileor wrote:
On 07/02, Rikimaru Honjo wrote:
Hello,
I'm planning to use cinder as glance store.
And, I'll setup cinder to connect
That will depend on the Cinder/OS-brick iscsiadm versions right? Can you
tell what are the versions from where the problem was fixed?
Erlon
2018-02-07 8:27 GMT-02:00 Gorka Eguileor :
> On 07/02, Rikimaru Honjo wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I'm planning to use cinder as glance
On 07/02, Rikimaru Honjo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm planning to use cinder as glance store.
> And, I'll setup cinder to connect storage by iSCSI multipath.
>
> In this case, can I run glance-api and cinder-volume on the same node?
>
> In my understanding, glance-api will attach a volume to own node
Hello,
I'm planning to use cinder as glance store.
And, I'll setup cinder to connect storage by iSCSI multipath.
In this case, can I run glance-api and cinder-volume on the same node?
In my understanding, glance-api will attach a volume to own node and
write a uploaded image to the volume if
Hello Glancers,
Please take a look at Bhagyashri's patch, which was given a FFE.
There's a slight deviation from the spec, so I need feedback about
whether this is acceptable (spoiler alert: I think it's OK). So
please comment on that aspect of the patch even if you don't have time
at the
Thanks for following up on this, Abhishek. After our discussion
approving this at the weekly meeting, I completely forgot to send out
an update. As Abhishek indicated, the discussion was positive, and
this FFE is APPROVED.
cheers,
brian
On Mon, Feb 5, 2018 at 3:56 AM, Abhishek Kekane
Sorry, Forgot to add meeting logs link in previous mail.
Here it is;
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/glance/2018/glance.2018-02-01-14.01.log.html#l-164
Thank you,
Abhishek Kekane
On Mon, Feb 5, 2018 at 12:30 PM, Abhishek Kekane wrote:
> We have discussed this in
We have discussed this in glance weekly meeting [1] and most of the core
reviewers are inclined towards accepting this FFE.
+1 from my side as this --check command will be very helpful for operators.
Thank you Bhagyashri for working on this.
Abhishek Kekane
On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 7:29 PM,
All the best Erno, Long may you reign ;)
Abhishek
On 31-Jan-2018 18:38, "Erno Kuvaja" wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After lengthy discussions and careful thinking I have thrown my name
> into the hat for Glance PTL. You can find my thoughts from the
> candidacy patch
Hi Glance Folks,
I'm requesting an Feature Freeze Exception for the lite-spec
http://specs.openstack.org/openstack/glance-specs/specs/untargeted/glance/lite-spec-db-sync-check.html
which is implemented by https://review.openstack.org/#/c/455837/8/
Regards,
Bhagyashri Shewale
On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 11:39 PM, Brian Rosmaita
wrote:
[snip]
> Glance cores, please do not merge any patches until after
> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/536630/ has merged.
The patch merged at 08:15UTC today. Merge away (subject to common
sense and the fact that
Hi all,
After lengthy discussions and careful thinking I have thrown my name
into the hat for Glance PTL. You can find my thoughts from the
candidacy patch https://review.openstack.org/#/c/539196/
I'd like to take the opportunity to thank most recently Brian but also
our other former PTLs from
Glance 16.0.0.0b3 was released today, The tag was created at this commit:
http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/glance/commit/?id=631add1ba849eac67ecb36ea4c90b57a300a96fa
which is dated Thu, 18 Jan 2018 12:09:11 +
As you'll notice, that was about 2 weeks ago. Which prompts the
question,
On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 2:18 PM, Brian Rosmaita
wrote:
> I've been PTL of Glance through some rocky times, but have decided not
> to stand for election for the Rocky cycle. My plan is to stick
> around, attend to my duties as a glance core contributor, and support
>
Excerpts from Brian Rosmaita's message of 2018-01-29 14:18:18 -0500:
> I've been PTL of Glance through some rocky times, but have decided not
> to stand for election for the Rocky cycle. My plan is to stick
> around, attend to my duties as a glance core contributor, and support
> my successor in
++ Thanks for leadership within Glance and everything else you've done in
the community!
--
Kevin Carter
IRC: Cloudnull
On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 1:27 PM, Sean McGinnis
wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 02:18:18PM -0500, Brian Rosmaita wrote:
> > I've been PTL of Glance
Thanks so much for your remarkable work for glance for the couple of
cycles. You have introduced very good processes like weekly priorities
which helped community members to keep focused on priorities. It’s my
pleasure to work with you, and yet I need to learn lot from you. Wish you
all the best
On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 02:18:18PM -0500, Brian Rosmaita wrote:
> I've been PTL of Glance through some rocky times, but have decided not
> to stand for election for the Rocky cycle. My plan is to stick
> around, attend to my duties as a glance core contributor, and support
> my successor in
I've been PTL of Glance through some rocky times, but have decided not
to stand for election for the Rocky cycle. My plan is to stick
around, attend to my duties as a glance core contributor, and support
my successor in whatever way I can to make for a smooth transition.
After three consecutive
Update on the 24 hours since the last update:
tl;dr: glance cores, do not approve any substantial code changes until
after the functional tests are restored. See below for details.
On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 8:09 PM, Brian Rosmaita
wrote:
> Update on the last 24 hours:
Confirmed that no issue in loading the middleware, problem lies somewhere
else.
Still trying to figure it out.
Thanks & Regards,
Abhishek
On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 4:00 PM, Abhishek Kekane wrote:
> I have tried to debug this in my environment but so far not able to find
>
Update on the last 24 hours:
(1) Sean's patch splitting the unit and functional tests in tox has merged.
(2) My patch to restore the functional test gate jobs ran into a
problem, namely, that one of the py35 tests suddenly begun failing in
the gate, and I haven't been able to reproduce it
I have tried to debug this in my environment but so far not able to find
the reason.
While starting the api service from functional tests it fails to load
middleware 'rootapp' from api-paste.ini
What I have done is added below lines in tox.ini to enable debugging of
functional tests
Looks like something changed in a distro dependency over the weekend
and the glance py27 gate is failing.
I did a dist-upgrade in a new Ubuntu 16.04.3 vm, and was able to
reproduce the failures locally. I'll continue looking, but it's EOD
where I am, so I wanted to make sure this info is
As discussed at today's Glance meeting, the Q-3 milestone is next
week. Please focus on the following:
(1) image metadata injection
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/527635/
(2) interoperable image import
https://review.openstack.org/532502
https://review.openstack.org/532501
may be some more,
On 18-01-17 21:24:12, John Villalovos wrote:
> I have updated the bug with info I found out:
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/oslo.serialization/+bug/1728368
>
> Also I did a test patch with a proposed change:
> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/535166/
>
> This patch causes the unit tests to work.
>
I have updated the bug with info I found out:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/oslo.serialization/+bug/1728368
Also I did a test patch with a proposed change:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/535166/
This patch causes the unit tests to work.
As a note there is a deprecation warning in the current
add Ironic team in the loop
the revert patch got -1 from ironic folks , more details please see the
comments in https://review.openstack.org/534736
The possible solution is to figure out why the change break Glance's unit
test. which side should be fixed.
2018-01-17 20:14 GMT+08:00
On 18-01-16 19:12:16, ChangBo Guo wrote:
> What's the issue for Glance, any bug link ?
>
> 2018-01-16 0:12 GMT+08:00 Matthew Thode :
>
> > On 18-01-13 00:41:28, Matthew Thode wrote:
> > > https://review.openstack.org/531788 is the review we are seeing it in,
> > > but
What's the issue for Glance, any bug link ?
2018-01-16 0:12 GMT+08:00 Matthew Thode :
> On 18-01-13 00:41:28, Matthew Thode wrote:
> > https://review.openstack.org/531788 is the review we are seeing it in,
> > but 2.22.0 failed as well.
> >
> > I'm guessing it was
On 18-01-13 00:41:28, Matthew Thode wrote:
> https://review.openstack.org/531788 is the review we are seeing it in,
> but 2.22.0 failed as well.
>
> I'm guessing it was introduced in either
>
> https://github.com/openstack/oslo.serialization/commit/c1a7079c26d27a2e46cca26963d3d9aa040bdbe8
> or
>
https://review.openstack.org/531788 is the review we are seeing it in,
but 2.22.0 failed as well.
I'm guessing it was introduced in either
https://github.com/openstack/oslo.serialization/commit/c1a7079c26d27a2e46cca26963d3d9aa040bdbe8
or
Reminder: the Glance team has fewer than usual number of reviewers
available until after the new year.
The weekly Glance meeting is cancelled on Thursday, December 28.
Here's what we're working on between now and the next Glance meeting
on January 4, 2018:
* Glanceclient
We're aiming for a
Let's get the scrubber refactor and anything that got postponed from
Q-2 merged before the meeting on Thursday.
scrubber:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/510449/ (time zone bug has been addressed)
others:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/524060/
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/521457/
Hello Glancers,
As discussed at yesterday's Glance meeting, the priority for this week
is getting ready for the release of the Q-2 milestone, so:
1. the scrubber refactor
2. bugs scheduled for Q-2
3. enhanced tests for interoperable image import ("IIR")
I've put a list of patches and their
Hi all,
Due to the Thanks giving in US and as no agenda items were added by
the deadline yesterday we will not have glance meeting today. Will
recoup next week 30th of Nov.
Thanks,
Jokke
__
OpenStack Development Mailing
Thank you all for the support. I intend to help the Glance community
flourish, again.
cheers
On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 10:07 AM, Brian Rosmaita wrote:
> Having heard only positive responses, I'm happy to reinstate Nikhil
> Komawar as a glance core, with all the
Having heard only positive responses, I'm happy to reinstate Nikhil
Komawar as a glance core, with all the rights and privileges
pertaining thereto.
Welcome back, Nikhil!
cheers,
brian
On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 8:20 PM, Abhishek Kekane wrote:
> Big +2
> Glad you are back :)
>
Hello Glancers,
Due to the Thanksgiving holidays in the USA next week, we are
tentatively cancelling the meeting on November 23. However, most of
our developers these days are outside the USA, so if someone has a
pressing issue and puts the same on the meeting agenda before the
usual deadline
Big +2
Glad you are back :)
Abhishek
On 17-Nov-2017 4:59 AM, "Brian Rosmaita" wrote:
> I'm sure I don't need to introduce Nikhil Komawar (nikhil in IRC), who
> was Glance PTL for the Kilo, Liberty, and Newton releases and who was
> a long time Glance core until he
I'm sure I don't need to introduce Nikhil Komawar (nikhil in IRC), who
was Glance PTL for the Kilo, Liberty, and Newton releases and who was
a long time Glance core until he stepped down at the end of June this
year. Nikhil has informed me that he now has time to do Glance code
reviews again, and
1 - 100 of 1850 matches
Mail list logo