Hi Tang,
Please use a new thread for this new question. I'd like to keep the current
thread focused on How to set a proxy for zuul.
Ramy
From: Tang Chen [mailto:tangc...@cn.fujitsu.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2015 12:23 AM
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev]
Why do you want to stop those downloads? The purpose is to setup your VM so
that it has the latest code in the git repos and that each project has any
custom refs, such as the patch under test.
Also, this is a different problem than the subject, so should be a new thread.
Ramy
From: Abhishek
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
One of the tasks we have now that the 2.1 microversion API has become
the default is cleaning up the old references to 'v3', and moving all
the v2 code to a separate directory. This is needed because the
current arrangement is confusing, especially
There seem to be quite a backlog in openstack/requirements.
http://russellbryant.net/openstack-stats/requirements-reviewers-30.txt
there are roughly 10x new changes to the number of reviews cores are
managing to do.
This worries me, and I'd like to help.
How can I best do so?
-Rob
--
Robert
On 21/07/15 01:47, Assaf Muller wrote:
- Original Message -
I'm looking for feedback from anyone interest but, in particular, I'd
like feedback from the following people for varying perspectives:
Mark McClain (proposed alternate), John Belamaric (IPAM), Ryan Tidwell
(BGP), Neil
A few comments inline.
Generally speaking the only thing I'd like to remark is that this use case
makes sense independently of whether you are using overlay, or any other
SDN solution (whatever SDN means to you).
Also, please note that this thread is now split in two - there's a new
branch
All,
The OpenStack Security Guide is migrating to RST format [1] and with help from
the docs team we hope to have this completed shortly. We will therefore be
entering a freeze on all changes coming into the Security Guide until the
migration is complete, and all future changes will be in the
On Jul 20, 2015 4:26 PM, Ian Wells ijw.ubu...@cack.org.uk wrote:
There are two routed network models:
- I give my VM an address that bears no relation to its location and
ensure the routed fabric routes packets there - this is very much the
routing protocol method for doing things where I have
Why not stackforge?
Thanks,
Kevin
From: Hayes, Graham
Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2015 11:53:35 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: [openstack-dev] [GSLB][LBaaS] Launchpad project, git repos and more!
Hi All,
I have created
hi Asselin,
On 07/21/2015 11:52 PM, Asselin, Ramy wrote:
Tang,
#openstack-meeting is for people to come together for officially
scheduled meetings [1]
Did you try to join the 3^rd party meeting on Monday[2]? I was
chairing the meeting but did not see you. That would be a great forum
to
Hi,
While developing Nested Quota Driver for Cinder, when performing
show/update/delete following restrictions apply :-
1. show : Only user who is admin or admin in parent or admin in root
project should be able to perform show/view the quota of the leaf projects.
2. update : Only user admin in
-weekly-meeting-20150721
See you tomorrow
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman
Tang,
#openstack-meeting is for people to come together for officially scheduled
meetings [1]
Did you try to join the 3rd party meeting on Monday[2]? I was chairing the
meeting but did not see you. That would be a great forum to ask these questions.
Otherwise, you can ask in #openstack-infra.
On 21 July 2015 at 16:17, Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.net wrote:
There seem to be quite a backlog in openstack/requirements.
http://russellbryant.net/openstack-stats/requirements-reviewers-30.txt
there are roughly 10x new changes to the number of reviews cores are
managing to do.
Hi Wei,
Yes, We will have project meeting on IRC every week. I will send out an
cancellation notice to the openstack-dev if a meeting will be canceled.
You are welcome to join!
Cathy
From: Vikram Choudhary [mailto:viks...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2015 3:40 AM
To: OpenStack
On 07/21/2015 12:01 PM, Joshua Harlow wrote:
Count me in to,
I can help, although not exactly sure what helping entails (requirements
reviews don't exactly feel like they are complex to really need tons of
reviews, it's not like they are some complex code algorithm that may be
buggy...).
Count me in to,
I can help, although not exactly sure what helping entails (requirements
reviews don't exactly feel like they are complex to really need tons of
reviews, it's not like they are some complex code algorithm that may be
buggy...).
Robert Collins wrote:
There seem to be quite a
On 07/21/2015 10:17 AM, Robert Collins wrote:
There seem to be quite a backlog in openstack/requirements.
http://russellbryant.net/openstack-stats/requirements-reviewers-30.txt
there are roughly 10x new changes to the number of reviews cores are
managing to do.
This worries me, and I'd
Grenade is blowing up on an AttributeError in glance, just started
blowing up today so it must be a new library release.
Bug is tracked here:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/glance/+bug/1476770
--
Thanks,
Matt Riedemann
__
Actually, I didn't participate in that process a lot - just reviewed plugin
couple of times and as I know, we had had a commits that deleted zabbix
from current Fuel.
There is bug about that: https://bugs.launchpad.net/fuel/+bug/1455664
There is a review: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/182615/
node-uuid is very terrible from UX perspective of view. Ask support people
if they are comfortable to ssh such nodes or telling the name in phone
conversation with customer. If we cannot validate FQDN of hostname I would
slip this feature to next release where we can pay more attention to
details.
https://github.com/stackforge/fuel-library/blob/master/deployment/puppet/osnailyfacter/modular/zabbix/tasks.yaml
As far as I see, zabbix is still present in deployment graph, so it's a bug
;(
--
Best regards,
Sergii Golovatiuk,
Skype #golserge
IRC #holser
On 07/21/2015 11:42 PM, Asselin, Ramy wrote:
Hi Tang,
Please use a new thread for this new question. I'd like to keep the
current thread focused on How to set a proxy for zuul.
Sure, will start a new thread if I cannot get it through.
Thanks. :)
Ramy
*From:*Tang Chen
Hi all,
When I send a patch to gerrit, my zuul is notified, but jenkins jobs are
not run.
My CI always reports the following error:
Merge Failed.
This change was unable to be automatically merged with the current state of the
repository. Please rebase your change and upload a new patchset.
Folks,
I'll push DevOps to run the script. However, what we need is to just go
ahead and clean up, abandon manually what is not relevant anymore, provide
comment.
Please start with your patches.
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 11:08 PM Oleg Gelbukh ogelb...@mirantis.com wrote:
Nicely put, Doug, you
Cool! Thanks for the work!
2015-07-21 22:51 GMT+08:00 Ed Leafe e...@leafe.com:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
One of the tasks we have now that the 2.1 microversion API has become
the default is cleaning up the old references to 'v3', and moving all
the v2 code to a
So, as discussed on #irc, I plan to:
1. Check with folks who are running in a devstack environment as to
where/how their barbican.conf file is configured.
2. Will keep you updated as to the progress of dogtag packaging in
Ubuntu/Debian. Currently, there are a couple of bugs due to changes in
Hi,
While developing Nested Quota Driver for Cinder, when performing
show/update/delete following restrictions apply :-
1. show : Only user who is admin or admin in parent or admin in root
project should be able to perform show/view the quota of the leaf projects.
2. update : Only user admin in
On 21 July 2015 at 07:52, Carl Baldwin c...@ecbaldwin.net wrote:
Now, you seem to generally be thinking in terms of the latter model,
particularly since the provider network model you're talking about fits
there. But then you say:
Actually, both. For example, GoDaddy assigns each vm an ip
Wow, a lot to digest in these threads. If I can summarize my understanding of
the two proposals. Let me know whether I get this right. There are a couple
problems that need to be solved:
a. Scheduling based on host reachability to the segments
b. Floating IP functionality across the segments.
+1. I think the group discussion should be one of the items on the meeting
agenda for next week.
Regards
Kunal
On Jul 21, 2015, at 12:21 PM, Susanne Balle sleipnir...@gmail.com wrote:
correction: I think that discussing who should be in what group at next
week's meeting make sense.
Hi All,
Something we discussed at the summit was to switch the focus of
tripleo's deployment method to deploy using instack using images built
with tripleo-puppet-elements. Up to now all the instack work has been
done downstream of tripleo as part of rdo. Having parts of our
deployment
I have created a doc in ether pad to get a voting started on the project name.
Please feel free to suggest names or vote on existing names.
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/GSLB_project_name_vote
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/GSLB_project_name_vote
Regards
Kunal
On Jul 21, 2015, at 12:36
Yup - we are waiting for the experimental projects spec to merge in
openstack governance - we have a patch ready and waiting[1].
This is just to allow us to get moving.
- 1 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/201683/
On 21/07/15 20:56, Clint Byrum wrote:
Perhaps I missed a discussion: You seem to
Adrian,
I definitely agree with #1 - #5. I am just trying to understand the nova virt
driver for hyper approach. As Peng mentioned, hyper is a hypervisor-based
substitute for container, but magnum is not making a special virt driver for
container host creation (Instead, magnum leverages the
Hi All,
I have created a github org and 2 repos for us to get started in.
https://github.com/gslb/ is the org, with https://github.com/gslb/gslb
as the main code repo.
There is 2 teams (Github's name for groups) gslb-core, and gslb-admin.
Core have read/write access to the repos, and admin can
correction: I think that discussing who should be in what group at next
week's meeting make sense. Susanne
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 3:18 PM, Susanne Balle sleipnir...@gmail.com
wrote:
cool! thanks. I will request to be added to the correct groups.
Susanne
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 2:53 PM,
Perhaps I missed a discussion: You seem to be doing all the things that
an OpenStack project team does. Is there some reason you aren't just
creating an OpenStack project team?
http://governance.openstack.org/reference/new-projects-requirements.html
Excerpts from Robert Collins's message of 2015-07-22 03:17:53 +1200:
There seem to be quite a backlog in openstack/requirements.
http://russellbryant.net/openstack-stats/requirements-reviewers-30.txt
there are roughly 10x new changes to the number of reviews cores are
managing to do.
cool! thanks. I will request to be added to the correct groups.
Susanne
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 2:53 PM, Hayes, Graham graham.ha...@hp.com wrote:
Hi All,
I have created a github org and 2 repos for us to get started in.
https://github.com/gslb/ is the org, with https://github.com/gslb/gslb
I forgot to add there is also an IRC channel created -
#openstack-gslb
I also have one item for the agenda that we should think about over the
week - do we want to have a project name?
If we do we should add it soon, so we can name projects/repo etc correctly.
- Graham
On 21/07/15 20:02,
I was about to ask that very same thing and, at the same time, if you can
indicate if you’ve seen errors in any logs and if so please provide those as
well. I’m hoping you just didn’t delete the hashes.pkl file though ☺
-Paul
From: Clay Gerrard [mailto:clay.gerr...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday,
Hello,
I would like to request for a freeze exception for the following bug:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/horizon/+bug/1475190
Here is the patch:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/202836/
This patch is not required in master as the network profile feature is
supported in neutron for liberty
Hi John ,
Thanks for providing the solution .
Its a bug in Barbican code , it works without passing the length .
I would raise the bug and fix it .
root@HSM-Client bin]# python pkcs11-key-generation --library-path
'/usr/lib/libCryptoki2_64.so' --passphrase 'test123' --slot-id 1 mkek
--label
On 7/21/2015 12:58 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote:
Grenade is blowing up on an AttributeError in glance, just started
blowing up today so it must be a new library release.
Bug is tracked here:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/glance/+bug/1476770
We're waiting to see if
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 5:38 AM Fedor Zhadaev fzhad...@mirantis.com wrote:
Hi all,
The next issue was found during implementation
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/fuel/+spec/node-naming :
User may change node hostname to any another, including default-like
'node-{№}', where № may be
Hi All ,
Would like to understand the usage of HMAC in HSM. From Barbican , we send
the request to generate MKEK and HMAC.
What is the relation between HMAC, MKEK AND KEK.
would need help in understanding HMAC.
--
*Thanks and Regards,*
*Asha Seshagiri*
Yes, it's supposed to work, but you've run in to some errors we've been finding
and fixing. Right now the top priority for the Swift dev community is to take
care of the outstanding EC issues and make a release.
The list of the known EC bugs right now is
Folks,
To test the latest feature of Swift erasure coding, I followed this
document (
http://docs.openstack.org/developer/swift/overview_erasure_code.html) to
deploy a simple cluster. I used Swift 2.3.0.
I am glad that operations like object PUT/GET/DELETE worked fine. I can see
that objects
How did you deleted one data fragment?
Like replication the EC consistency engine uses some sub directory hashing
to accelerate replication requests in a consistent system - so if you just
rm a file down in an hashdir somewhere you also need to delete the
hashes.pkl up in the part dir (or call
On 7/21/2015 3:24 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote:
On 7/21/2015 12:58 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote:
Grenade is blowing up on an AttributeError in glance, just started
blowing up today so it must be a new library release.
Bug is tracked here:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/glance/+bug/1476770
We're
Looks like we have a consensus, I've added Denys to the fuel-docs-core
group.
Congratulations Denys, please keep up the good work!
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 11:30 AM Mike Scherbakov mscherba...@mirantis.com
wrote:
+1
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 8:40 AM Miroslav Anashkin manash...@mirantis.com
I may be in a small minority since I a) use VXLAN, b) don’t hate multicast and
c) use linuxbridge instead of OVS. However I thought I’d share this patch in
case I’m not alone.
If you assume the use of multicast, VXLAN works quite nicely to isolate L2
domains AND to prevent delivery of unwanted
On 21 July 2015 at 12:11, John Belamaric jbelama...@infoblox.com wrote:
Wow, a lot to digest in these threads. If I can summarize my
understanding of the two proposals. Let me know whether I get this right.
There are a couple problems that need to be solved:
a. Scheduling based on host
Hi John ,
One quick question :
When barbican is integrated with HSM , we send the order request to
generate symmetric key .
The request would goes to HSM and would generate the symmetic key which is
a secret.Then the secret is wrapped with the KEKs and then sent to
Barbican.
The key requested
Dolph,
Excuse the delayed reply, was waiting for a brilliant solution from
someone. Without one, personally I'd prefer the cronjob as it seems to be
the type of thing cron was designed for. That will be a painful change as
people now rely on this behavior so I don't know if its feasible. I will
It is useful, yes; and posting diffs on the mailing list is not the way to
get them reviewed and approved. If you can get this on gerrit it will get
a proper review, and I would certainly like to see something like this
incorporated.
On 21 July 2015 at 15:41, John Nielsen li...@jnielsen.net
Well, you might be in luck! Morgan Fainberg actually implemented an
improvement that was apparently documented by Adam Young way back in March:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/keystone/+bug/1287757
There's a link to the stable/kilo backport in comment #2 - I'd be eager to
hear how it performs for
Please make sure to check the previous discussion about the effort Vivek is
leading [1]
[1] https://www.mail-archive.com/openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org/msg58328.html
From: jiangshan0...@139.commailto:jiangshan0...@139.com
jiangshan0...@139.commailto:jiangshan0...@139.com
Reply-To:
Hi all,
[special attention: Jay Lau]
The bp[1] registered, asks for the following implementation -
* 'magnum service-list' should be similar to 'nova service-list'
* 'magnum service-list' should be moved to be ' magnum
k8s-service-list'. Also similar holds true for 'pod-list'/'rc-list'
As
Hi Tang,
Can you please send me the whole job snippet you wrote.
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 12:52 PM, Tang Chen tangc...@cn.fujitsu.com wrote:
Hi Asselin, Abhishek,
I got some problems when I was trying to write a jenkins job.
I found that when zuul received the notification from gerrit,
On 07/21/2015 03:35 PM, Abhishek Shrivastava wrote:
Hi Tang,
Can you please send me the whole job snippet you wrote.
In /etc/jenkins_jobs/config/ examples.yaml, that's all.
- job-template:
name: 'noop-check-communication'
node: '{node}'
builders:
- shell: |
Currently horizon doesn’t support LBaaS v2, there is a blueprint related
but it doesn’t implement yet:
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/horizon/+spec/lbaas-v2-panel
2015-07-21 9:49 GMT+08:00 jiangshan0...@139.com jiangshan0...@139.com:
Hi all,
I have configured these lines in my
On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 12:24:13PM -0600, Matt Fischer wrote:
Dmitry and I chatted some this morning and I'd at least like to address
those issues so that we can resolve them and move on to the other
discussions. I am not speaking for Emilien here, just jumping in as a core
and trying to help
Hi Asselin, Abhishek,
I got some problems when I was trying to write a jenkins job.
I found that when zuul received the notification from gerrit, jenkins
didn't run the test.
I added something to noop-check-communication in
/etc/jenkins_jobs/config/ examples.yaml,
just touched a file under
Hi Steven, thank you for letting us know about your use case,
The problem is caused because since 6.1 release we run
part of network verification tasks before deployment [1], from
the code it can be seen, that this check is hardcoded [2], before
we send any deployment tasks, so we should figure
If you want to create a new job then refer *dsvm-cinder-driver.yaml.sample*,
and regarding *noop-check-communication* its just for testing the first
time don't modify it.
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 1:19 PM, Tang Chen tangc...@cn.fujitsu.com wrote:
On 07/21/2015 03:35 PM, Abhishek Shrivastava
On Sun, Jul 19, 2015 at 09:42:20PM -0400, Emilien Macchi wrote:
I'm currently in holidays but I could not resist to take some time and
reply.
Thanks for taking the time, apologies about distracting you from your
vacation!
Please read again my first comment on the Governance patch:
They
I confirm that it happened again. I started all the designate processes and
after an hour (approximately), the designate-api process died with the same
stack trace.
Restarting the designate-api does not help because API requests are not
replied any more (timeouts):
2015-07-21 10:12:53.463 4403
Hi all! I'm writing a fuel plugin that depends on another plugin, in
particular one plugin install node-js and the other plugin install a
software that uses nodejs.
What i did is to add a condition in environment_config.yaml:
```
*restrictions:*
*- condition:
Hi, currently it's not possible to handle cases like this. The expression
parser by default expects every key in the expression to exist, otherwise
it throws an error. But it also supports non-strict mode, in which
non-existent keys are treated as null value. We can add support for
enabling this
Hi Wei,
It happens every week unless cancelled by the chair.
Thanks
Vikram
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 3:10 PM, Damon Wang damon.dev...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Does service chaining project meeting will be held this week? I'd like to
join :-D
Wei Wang
2015-07-17 2:09 GMT+08:00 Cathy Zhang
@Dims,
The main advantage of having a handler is a more clean output in case a
service is killed, which means there wouldn't be a stacktrace with
KeyboardInterrupt
exception, just messages like we have in nova now (nova Switch to
oslo.service patch hadn't merged yet):
2015-07-21 10:46:06.765
You can (nearly) add Designate to this list :)
Pradeep has been doing a great job getting the codebase py3 compatible!
Thanks,
Kiall
On 17/07/15 12:32, Victor Stinner wrote:
Hi,
We are close to having a voting py34 gate on all OpenStack libraries and
applications. I just made the py34 gate
Daniel,
Yes, it doesn't work in 6.1 release. My question is: are you OK if we
support your case in 7.0 using the approach I described?
2015-07-21 14:13 GMT+03:00 Daniel Depaoli daniel.depa...@create-net.org:
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 12:02 PM, Vitaly Kramskikh
vkramsk...@mirantis.com wrote:
We have been waiting python-cinderclient stable/kilo release for couple of
weeks to be able to merge glance_store stable/kilo backports. Namigly:
https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/glance_store+branch:stable/kilo,n,z
As Alan blocked them all, I’d like to ask
Hi,
Could you please modify the wiki page yourself to add Designate? I don't want
to be the only one maintaining this wiki page ;-)
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Python3
Victor
- Original Message -
From: Kiall Mac Innes ki...@macinnes.ie
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Elena,
The cleaner output was the norm before oslo.service was merged and if
there are no downsides, then we should fix oslo.service to do the
same.
thanks,
dims
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 6:49 AM, Elena Ezhova eezh...@mirantis.com wrote:
@Dims,
The main advantage of having a handler is a more
On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 08:12:18AM +0300, Feodor Tersin wrote:
The third reason is that at least xen supports them.I know that vdr
becomes /dev/xvdr, but:1) I believe the main aim of specifying device
name is to easy distinguish among devices. A last char is enough for
that. And xen supports
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 12:02 PM, Vitaly Kramskikh vkramsk...@mirantis.com
wrote:
Hi, currently it's not possible to handle cases like this. The expression
parser by default expects every key in the expression to exist, otherwise
it throws an error. But it also supports non-strict mode, in
Hi Kiall,
It's a bit strange because only designate-api dies but designate-sink is
also integrated with qpid and survives.
These issues are a bit difficult because it is not deterministic. What I've
just tested is using a local qpid instance and it looks like the
designate-api is not killed any
Yes, it should resolve my case and in general any case of dependency of
something that is not installed.
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 1:23 PM, Vitaly Kramskikh vkramsk...@mirantis.com
wrote:
Daniel,
Yes, it doesn't work in 6.1 release. My question is: are you OK if we
support your case in 7.0
Hi folks!
If you're not aware already, I'm working on solving node is locked
problems breaking users (and tracking it at
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/ironic-locking-reform). We have retries
in place in client, but we all agree that it's not the eventual solution.
One of the things we've
Hi all,
We have been waiting python-cinderclient stable/kilo release for couple of
weeks to be able to merge glance_store stable/kilo backports. Namigly:
https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/glance_store+branch:stable/kilo,n,z
As Alan blocked them all, I'd like to ask
Inline.
Thanks,
Kiall
On 21/07/15 09:24, Jaime Fernández wrote:
I confirm that it happened again. I started all the designate processes
and after an hour (approximately), the designate-api process died with
the same stack trace.
Restarting the designate-api does not help because API
Its just because what kind of file are you creating, as touch
/tmp/noop-check-communication doesn't makes any sense to it.
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 2:48 PM, Tang Chen tangc...@cn.fujitsu.com wrote:
On 07/21/2015 04:05 PM, Abhishek Shrivastava wrote:
If you want to create a new job then refer
Hi,
It seems like the gating is failing with cep tests:
http://logs.openstack.org/29/199129/6/check/gate-tempest-dsvm-full-ceph/bfe423d/logs/testr_results.html.gz
Is anyone looking into this?
Thanks
Gary
__
OpenStack
On 07/21/2015 10:51 AM, Gary Kotton wrote:
Hi,
It seems like the gating is failing with cep tests:
http://logs.openstack.org/29/199129/6/check/gate-tempest-dsvm-full-ceph/bfe423d/logs/testr_results.html.gz
Is anyone looking into this?
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/203845/ is a band-aid,
Also, can't we stop downloading all those projects and let them include
them in the DevStack using the ENABLED_SERVICES parameter, like we usually
do while installing devstack.
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 11:18 AM, Abhishek Shrivastava
abhis...@cloudbyte.com wrote:
Hi Ramy,
- The project
On 07/21/2015 04:05 PM, Abhishek Shrivastava wrote:
If you want to create a new job then refer
*dsvm-cinder-driver.yaml.sample*, and regarding
*noop-check-communication* its just for testing the first time don't
modify it.
Well, I understand. But I don't think this little change will
Hi,
Does service chaining project meeting will be held this week? I'd like to
join :-D
Wei Wang
2015-07-17 2:09 GMT+08:00 Cathy Zhang cathy.h.zh...@huawei.com:
Hi Everyone,
Thanks for joining the service chaining project meeting on 7/16/2015.
Here is the link to the meeting logs:
On 20/07/15 18:36, Carl Baldwin wrote:
I'm looking for feedback from anyone interest but, in particular, I'd
like feedback from the following people for varying perspectives:
Mark McClain (proposed alternate), John Belamaric (IPAM), Ryan Tidwell
(BGP), Neil Jerram (L3 networks), Aaron Rosen
Hi,
So, it looks like the only reason we check the reservation field here is
because we want to return a 409 for node is locked rather than a 400,
right? do_node_deploy and such will raise a NodeLocked, which should do
the same as this check. It's unclear to me why we can't just remove this
Hi,
Another question folks: while the problem above is valid and should be
solved, I was actually keeping in mind another one:
https://github.com/openstack/ironic/blob/master/ironic/api/controllers/v1/node.py#L1052-L1057
This is also not retried, and it prevents updating during power
On 07/21/2015 03:26 PM, Lucas Alvares Gomes wrote:
Hi,
So, it looks like the only reason we check the reservation field here is
because we want to return a 409 for node is locked rather than a 400,
right? do_node_deploy and such will raise a NodeLocked, which should do
the same as this check.
On 07/21/2015 03:32 PM, Lucas Alvares Gomes wrote:
Hi,
Another question folks: while the problem above is valid and should be
solved, I was actually keeping in mind another one:
https://github.com/openstack/ironic/blob/master/ironic/api/controllers/v1/node.py#L1052-L1057
This is also not
Hello
I'd like to ask for a freeze exception for the follow bug fix:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/198385/
bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1443970
merged bug fix in master: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/173362/
Incorrect usage of argument 'dhcp_server' may be cause of some
Hi Fedor,
Use 'node-{ID}-{#}' format, where {#} we'll chose in loop till the first
unique.
I don't like this approach by many reasons. Here's some of them:
* With a loop you're going to perform N SQL queries in order to check
for uniqueness, and that's a bad design and it'd be better to
On 07/21/2015 02:24 PM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote:
Hi folks!
If you're not aware already, I'm working on solving node is locked
problems breaking users (and tracking it at
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/ironic-locking-reform). We have retries
in place in client, but we all agree that it's not the
Hi all,
The next issue was found during implementation
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/fuel/+spec/node-naming :
User may change node hostname to any another, including default-like
'node-{№}', where № may be bigger than maximum nodeID existing at that
moment.
Later when node with ID == №
1 - 100 of 106 matches
Mail list logo
