Re: [openstack-dev] [QA] [Ironic] [Inspector] Where should integration tests for non-core projects live now? (Was: Toward 2.0.0 release)

2015-06-10 Thread Boris Pavlovic
Dmitry, If you chose to use Rally framework for testing there are 3 opportunities: - Keep Rally plugins (tests) in separated tree - Keep Rally plugins (tests) in your project tree - Keep Rally plugins (tests) in Rally repo Rally plugins can be used for all kinds of testing: (perf,

Re: [openstack-dev] [QA] [Ironic] [Inspector] Where should integration tests for non-core projects live now? (Was: Toward 2.0.0 release)

2015-06-10 Thread Dmitry Tantsur
On 06/10/2015 11:57 AM, Boris Pavlovic wrote: Dmitry, If you chose to use Rally framework for testing there are 3 opportunities: - Keep Rally plugins (tests) in separated tree - Keep Rally plugins (tests) in your project tree - Keep Rally plugins (tests) in Rally repo Rally plugins can

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][python3] use of six.iteritems()

2015-06-10 Thread Sean Dague
On 06/09/2015 08:15 PM, Robert Collins wrote: I'm very glad folk are working on Python3 ports. I'd like to call attention to one little wart in that process: I get the feeling that folk are applying a massive regex to find things like d.iteritems() and convert that to six.iteritems(d).

Re: [openstack-dev] [murano] shellcheck all .sh scripts in murano-deployment

2015-06-10 Thread Serg Melikyan
Hi Kirill, +1 from my side, shellcheck + bashate can help to increase quality of CI scripts. On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 2:19 PM, Igor Yozhikov iyozhi...@mirantis.com wrote: Hi, I'm using shellcheck during automation scripts writing as linter and I believe that incorporation of this tool for

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] oslo releasing is noisy...

2015-06-10 Thread Victor Stinner
Le 09/06/2015 18:31, Thierry Carrez a écrit : We are currently exploring the option to repurpose the openstack-announce ML to be the extensive record of release announcements. It's part of a larger plan to streamline library releases, about which Doug should start a discussion pretty soon now.

Re: [openstack-dev] [packaging] Adding packaging as an OpenStack project

2015-06-10 Thread Matthias Runge
On 10/06/15 12:07, Robert Collins wrote: On 10 June 2015 at 20:12, Matthias Runge mru...@redhat.com wrote: Since our software is to be consumed by packages, shouldn't the packages project consider itself to be responsible for global requirements? I.e. checking, if requirements are packageable,

Re: [openstack-dev] [murano] shellcheck all .sh scripts in murano-deployment

2015-06-10 Thread Igor Yozhikov
Hi, I'm using shellcheck during automation scripts writing as linter and I believe that incorporation of this tool for additional verification in CI is good idea. Thanks, Igor Yozhikov Senior Deployment Engineer at Mirantis http://www.mirantis.com skype: igor.yozhikov cellular: +7 901 5331200

Re: [openstack-dev] [packaging] Adding packaging as an OpenStack project

2015-06-10 Thread Robert Collins
On 10 June 2015 at 20:12, Matthias Runge mru...@redhat.com wrote: Since our software is to be consumed by packages, shouldn't the packages project consider itself to be responsible for global requirements? I.e. checking, if requirements are packageable, if versions fit, etc. I think we

Re: [openstack-dev] [packaging] Adding packaging as an OpenStack project

2015-06-10 Thread Dirk Müller
Hi Derek, I selected these 80 to move all of what RDO is currently maintaining on gerrithub to review.openstack.org, this was perhaps too big a set and in RDO we instead may need to go hybrid. Yeah, In my opinion we ahve lots of repeated divergence between the different python modules, so

Re: [openstack-dev] [murano] shellcheck all .sh scripts in murano-deployment

2015-06-10 Thread Filip Blaha
+1, nice idea. Shell script are not easy to review - large files, not covered by unit tests. Any automatic tool could be beneficial. Regards Filip On 06/09/2015 09:58 PM, Kirill Zaitsev wrote: Folks, I’ve got another proposal, mainly to the guys, who deal with CI and test jobs daily. What

Re: [openstack-dev] [packaging] Adding packaging as an OpenStack project

2015-06-10 Thread Dave Walker
On 10 June 2015 at 11:07, Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.net wrote: On 10 June 2015 at 20:12, Matthias Runge mru...@redhat.com wrote: Since our software is to be consumed by packages, shouldn't the packages project consider itself to be responsible for global requirements? I.e.

Re: [openstack-dev] [QA] [Ironic] [Inspector] Where should integration tests for non-core projects live now? (Was: Toward 2.0.0 release)

2015-06-10 Thread Boris Pavlovic
Dmitry, We introduced recently dsvm rally ironic job: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/187997/ Now we are working on Rally tests for Ironic: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/186064/ Don't hesitate to join us=) Best regards, Boris Pavlovic On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 1:23 PM, Dmitry Tantsur

[openstack-dev] [QA] [Ironic] [Inspector] Where should integration tests for non-core projects live now? (Was: Toward 2.0.0 release)

2015-06-10 Thread Dmitry Tantsur
Hi, QA folks! As ironic-inspector is joining the openstack/* crows, we're faces with integration testing question. At the summit we discussed with Devananda that it makes sense for inspector + ironic integration test to live in tempest with other bare metal tests. However, judging by

Re: [openstack-dev] [QA] [Ironic] [Inspector] Where should integration tests for non-core projects live now? (Was: Toward 2.0.0 release)

2015-06-10 Thread Dmitry Tantsur
On 06/10/2015 09:40 AM, Ken'ichi Ohmichi wrote: Hi Dmitry, 2015-06-10 16:11 GMT+09:00 Dmitry Tantsur dtant...@redhat.com: Hi, QA folks! As ironic-inspector is joining the openstack/* crows, we're faces with integration testing question. At the summit we discussed with Devananda that it makes

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Liberty Priorties for Nova

2015-06-10 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 08:48:36AM +0200, Andreas Scheuring wrote: Daniel, if I got it right, the vif script blueprint only is about plug/unplug operations and not about generating new xml representations for vif types. What if for a new vif type it's sufficient to have the get_config_*

Re: [openstack-dev] doubt about static routes and host routes

2015-06-10 Thread Kevin Benton
Yes, static routes can be added to the router: https://ask.openstack.org/en/question/42529/how-to-add-extra-static-route-in-neutron-havana/ host_routes are routes advertised to the clients via DHCP, they don't apply to the router. I also would like to know use case of static routes of router and

Re: [openstack-dev] [QA] [Ironic] [Inspector] Where should integration tests for non-core projects live now? (Was: Toward 2.0.0 release)

2015-06-10 Thread Ken'ichi Ohmichi
2015-06-10 16:48 GMT+09:00 Dmitry Tantsur dtant...@redhat.com: On 06/10/2015 09:40 AM, Ken'ichi Ohmichi wrote: To solve it, we have decided the scope of Tempest as the etherpad mentioned. Are there any hints now on where we can start with our integration tests? For the other projects, we

Re: [openstack-dev] [release][oslo] oslotest release 1.7.0 (liberty)

2015-06-10 Thread Victor Sergeyev
Hi All, this oslotest release break oslo.messaging gate - unittest fails with ImportError, on import mox from six.moves - [0]. It caused by commit [1], which removed adding mox to six moves. There is a fix for oslo.messaging - [2] - please, help to merge it. [0] -

Re: [openstack-dev] [packaging] Adding packaging as an OpenStack project

2015-06-10 Thread Doug Hellmann
Excerpts from Matthias Runge's message of 2015-06-10 12:29:45 +0200: On 10/06/15 12:07, Robert Collins wrote: On 10 June 2015 at 20:12, Matthias Runge mru...@redhat.com wrote: Since our software is to be consumed by packages, shouldn't the packages project consider itself to be

Re: [openstack-dev] [Barbican] Multiple KMIP servers on a single barbican

2015-06-10 Thread Nathan Reller
You would need to update the KMIPSecretStore or create a new SecretStore to handle this. The logic should be behind the SecretStore abstraction because Barbican only allows one active secret store. I would think that the configuration file would have a listing of available KMIP server URLs. The

Re: [openstack-dev] ThirdPartyCI: Tempest job fails with Unexpected termination of the channel

2015-06-10 Thread Lenny Verkhovsky
Can you check dmesg –T to see at least if the messages are not too old? Are you using port2 as a connection to VM? Lenny Verkhovsky From: Eduard Matei [mailto:eduard.ma...@cloudfounders.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2015 10:34 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [stable] No longer doing stable point releases

2015-06-10 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 06/09/2015 04:54 PM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: On 2015-06-09 10:55:55 +0200 (+0200), Thomas Goirand wrote: [...] That's far from being in place. Also, while we are removing point releases, and support for Icehouse, we still don't have a common private Gerrit for security, which we've been told

[openstack-dev] doubt about static routes and host routes

2015-06-10 Thread Saju M
Hi, Can we add static routes to the router which created by #neutron router-create command ? What is the defference static routes of router and --host_routes of subnet ? I also would like to know use case of static routes of router and --host_routes of subnet ? Regards Saju Madhavan +91

[openstack-dev] [rabbitmq] ANN New ops-oriented guides on rabbitmq.com

2015-06-10 Thread Michael Klishin
First of all, apologies if this belongs strictly to openstack-docs, based on multiple discussions in Vancouver I'd like more people to be aware of this. As announced in April and at the summit in May, RabbitMQ team at Pivotal  would like to help with OpenStack documentation and operations

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][python3] use of six.iteritems()

2015-06-10 Thread Robert Collins
On 10 June 2015 at 21:30, Ihar Hrachyshka ihrac...@redhat.com wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 06/10/2015 02:15 AM, Robert Collins wrote: I'm very glad folk are working on Python3 ports. I'd like to call attention to one little wart in that process: I get the

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [stable] No longer doing stable point releases

2015-06-10 Thread Dave Walker
On 10 June 2015 at 09:53, Thomas Goirand z...@debian.org wrote: On 06/05/2015 02:46 PM, Thierry Carrez wrote: So.. summarizing the various options again: Plan A Just drop stable point releases. (-) No more release notes (-) Lack of reference points to compare installations Plan B Push

[openstack-dev] ThirdPartyCI: Tempest job fails with Unexpected termination of the channel

2015-06-10 Thread Eduard Matei
Short story: - all runs of the tempest job are failing after ~ 1,5 - 2 hrs with FATAL: java.io.IOException: Unexpected termination of the channel and jenkins logs SEVERE: I/O error in channel d-p-c-local_01-1655 java.io.IOException: Unexpected termination of the channel Long story: - Host is 4

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][api] 1 new guideline entering freeze period

2015-06-10 Thread Thierry Carrez
michael mccune wrote: The API working group has one new guidelines that is entering the freeze period. We would like to ask all PTLs and CPLs, and other interested parties, to take a look at these reviews. We will use lazy consensus at the end of the freeze to merge them if there are no

[openstack-dev] [Manila] Ask for help on supportting the 3-rd party CI for HDFS driver

2015-06-10 Thread Li, Chen
Hello Manila, There is a HDFS driver in Manila summited by our team in Kilo, so I guess we do own this driver in Manila for current situation. But, CI systems are really new to us, and we heard from other teams that they took almost one year to implement a CI for going through all the company

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [stable] No longer doing stable point releases

2015-06-10 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 06/05/2015 02:46 PM, Thierry Carrez wrote: So.. summarizing the various options again: Plan A Just drop stable point releases. (-) No more release notes (-) Lack of reference points to compare installations Plan B Push date-based tags across supported projects from time to time. (-)

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][python3] use of six.iteritems()

2015-06-10 Thread Ihar Hrachyshka
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 06/10/2015 02:15 AM, Robert Collins wrote: I'm very glad folk are working on Python3 ports. I'd like to call attention to one little wart in that process: I get the feeling that folk are applying a massive regex to find things like

Re: [openstack-dev] OpenStack Diversity Working Group

2015-06-10 Thread Victoria Martínez de la Cruz
Hi all, Thanks for starting this! I'd like to join you for the kick off meeting. In which timezone are the times in the Doodle? Cheers, Victoria 2015-06-09 17:28 GMT-03:00 Sousou, Imad imad.sou...@intel.com: Stackers – We’re happy to announce the creation of a Diversity Working Group. The

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Switching to SQLAlchemy 1.0.x

2015-06-10 Thread Thomas Goirand
Hi Mike, Thanks a lot for your quick reply which is very useful to me. On 06/09/2015 07:08 PM, Mike Bayer wrote: On 6/9/15 9:26 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote: Hi, The python-sqlalchemy package has been uploaded to Debian Experimental, and is about to be uploaded to Debian Unstable. So I wonder

Re: [openstack-dev] [QA] [Ironic] [Inspector] Where should integration tests for non-core projects live now? (Was: Toward 2.0.0 release)

2015-06-10 Thread Ken'ichi Ohmichi
Hi Dmitry, 2015-06-10 16:11 GMT+09:00 Dmitry Tantsur dtant...@redhat.com: Hi, QA folks! As ironic-inspector is joining the openstack/* crows, we're faces with integration testing question. At the summit we discussed with Devananda that it makes sense for inspector + ironic integration test

Re: [openstack-dev] [packaging] Adding packaging as an OpenStack project

2015-06-10 Thread Matthias Runge
On 27/05/15 10:14, Thomas Goirand wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi all, tl;dr: - - We'd like to push distribution packaging of OpenStack on upstream gerrit with reviews. - - The intention is to better share the workload, and improve the overall QA for packaging *and*

Re: [openstack-dev] [api] [Nova] [Ironic] [Magnum] Microversion guideline in API-WG

2015-06-10 Thread Salvatore Orlando
As a further data point, Neutron has been trying to introduce microversioning for a while, without success so far. Given the sheer amount of backends the management layer integrates with, and the constant need for the various subteams to experiment with the API, the proposal [1] has probably some

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][python3] use of six.iteritems()

2015-06-10 Thread Robert Collins
On 10 June 2015 at 17:22, gordon chung g...@live.ca wrote: maybe the suggestion should be don't blindly apply six.iteritems or items rather than don't apply iteritems at all. admittedly, it's a massive eyesore, but it's a very real use case that some projects deal with large data results

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] oslo releasing is noisy...

2015-06-10 Thread Thierry Carrez
Victor Stinner wrote: Le 09/06/2015 18:31, Thierry Carrez a écrit : We are currently exploring the option to repurpose the openstack-announce ML to be the extensive record of release announcements. It's part of a larger plan to streamline library releases, about which Doug should start a

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [stable] No longer doing stable point releases

2015-06-10 Thread Thierry Carrez
Dave Walker wrote: On 10 June 2015 at 09:53, Thomas Goirand z...@debian.org wrote: What would be your preferred option ? I see no point of doing D. I already don't use tarballs, and those who do could as well switch to generating them (how hard is it to run python setup.py sdist or git

Re: [openstack-dev] [murano] shellcheck all .sh scripts in murano-deployment

2015-06-10 Thread Jeremy Stanley
On 2015-06-10 13:48:26 +0200 (+0200), Filip Blaha wrote: +1, nice idea. Shell script are not easy to review - large files, not covered by unit tests. Any automatic tool could be beneficial. It's worth noting that just because your shell scripts don't have their own validation tests doesn't mean

Re: [openstack-dev] (re)centralizing library release management

2015-06-10 Thread Paul Belanger
On 06/09/2015 01:25 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: Until now we have encouraged project teams to prepare their own library releases as new versions of projects were needed. We've started running into a couple of problems with that, with releases not coming often enough, or at a bad time in the release

Re: [openstack-dev] [packaging] Adding packaging as an OpenStack project

2015-06-10 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 06/10/2015 12:25 PM, Dave Walker wrote: The initial core reviewers was seeded by representatives of distro's and vendors to get their input on viability in distro's. Really? James, were you made core on the requirements? I once tried to follow the requirements repo, though it moves too

Re: [openstack-dev] Enabling an Open Cloud with OpenStack

2015-06-10 Thread Zhipeng Huang
Hi Orran, We also have a project called Tricircle that aim to solve similar problem, but with a different approach with Mercador. You and your team are more than welcome to join the discussion we will hold in Tricircle Meeting. See the details at

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] API Extensions - Namespace URLs

2015-06-10 Thread Sean M. Collins
On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 05:21:18PM EDT, Kevin Benton wrote: I wasn't planning on wiping them out for now since I'm leveraging a lot of the extension loading that exists so someone can remove the namespaces if they want. OK - I'll take it on if there's no objections -- Sean M. Collins

Re: [openstack-dev] [packaging] Adding packaging as an OpenStack project

2015-06-10 Thread James Page
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 10/06/15 15:12, Thomas Goirand wrote: The initial core reviewers was seeded by representatives of distro's and vendors to get their input on viability in distro's. Really? James, were you made core on the requirements? Believe it or not,

Re: [openstack-dev] [packaging] Adding packaging as an OpenStack project

2015-06-10 Thread Dave Walker
On 10 June 2015 at 15:12, Thomas Goirand z...@debian.org wrote: On 06/10/2015 12:25 PM, Dave Walker wrote: The initial core reviewers was seeded by representatives of distro's and vendors to get their input on viability in distro's. Really? James, were you made core on the requirements? I

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder][nova] Is volume connection_info modeled/documented anywhere?

2015-06-10 Thread Duncan Thomas
I don't think you need an entry per driver, you need an entry per connection type - iSCSI, FC, DRDB, CEPH being the ones I can think of off the top of my head On 10 Jun 2015 16:57, Matt Riedemann mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote: While investigating/discussing bug 1463525 [1] I remembered how

Re: [openstack-dev] [packaging] Adding packaging as an OpenStack project

2015-06-10 Thread Ian Cordasco
On 6/10/15, 09:12, Thomas Goirand z...@debian.org wrote: On 06/10/2015 12:25 PM, Dave Walker wrote: The initial core reviewers was seeded by representatives of distro's and vendors to get their input on viability in distro's. Really? James, were you made core on the requirements? I once

[openstack-dev] Enabling an Open Cloud with OpenStack

2015-06-10 Thread Orran Krieger
Dear OpenStack community, The short version: We are proposing a new set of use cases for OpenStack and a set of changes to enable a multi-landlord cloud model, where multiple service providers can cooperate (and compete) to stand up services in a single cloud. We had great feedback from the

[openstack-dev] [cinder][nova] Is volume connection_info modeled/documented anywhere?

2015-06-10 Thread Matt Riedemann
While investigating/discussing bug 1463525 [1] I remembered how little I know about what can actually come out of the connection_info dict returned from the os-initialize_connection cinder API call. So we added some debug logging in nova and I remembered that there are potentially credentials

Re: [openstack-dev] [release][oslo] oslotest release 1.7.0 (liberty)

2015-06-10 Thread Victor Stinner
Good news: your fix is already merged into oslo.messaging ;-) oslo.messaging now uses directly mox3, on Python 2 and Python 3. Victor Le 10/06/2015 14:04, Victor Sergeyev a écrit : Hi All, this oslotest release break oslo.messaging gate - unittest fails with ImportError, on import mox from

Re: [openstack-dev] (re)centralizing library release management

2015-06-10 Thread Thierry Carrez
Paul Belanger wrote: While I haven't participated in release management before, I'd like to volunteer my services to help. Where is the best place (IRC) to collaborate? I would encourage prospective release managers to join #openstack-relmgr-office where Doug and I discuss that sort of things,

Re: [openstack-dev] [Manila] Ask for help on supportting the 3-rd party CI for HDFS driver

2015-06-10 Thread yang, xing
Hi Chen, You can ask if OpenStack Infrastructure team can set up CI for this driver. They have set up CI's for a few Cinder drivers based on open source storage systems. Thanks, Xing From: Li, Chen [mailto:chen...@intel.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2015 3:48 AM To: OpenStack Development

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Switching to SQLAlchemy 1.0.x

2015-06-10 Thread Mike Bayer
On 6/10/15 3:26 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote: Hi Mike, Thanks a lot for your quick reply which is very useful to me. On 06/09/2015 07:08 PM, Mike Bayer wrote: On 6/9/15 9:26 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote: Hi, The python-sqlalchemy package has been uploaded to Debian Experimental, and is about to

Re: [openstack-dev] [murano] shellcheck all .sh scripts in murano-deployment

2015-06-10 Thread Filip Blaha
Thanks for comment and suggestion! there is also shutil2 framework for unit testing over shell scripts. We shall consider it whether it could bring us value for the effort. I personally have no strong opinion about that. Little contradiction to my previous mail:-) Regards Filip On

Re: [openstack-dev] [packaging] Adding packaging as an OpenStack project

2015-06-10 Thread Joe Gordon
On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 5:24 PM, Ian Cordasco ian.corda...@rackspace.com wrote: On 6/10/15, 09:12, Thomas Goirand z...@debian.org wrote: On 06/10/2015 12:25 PM, Dave Walker wrote: The initial core reviewers was seeded by representatives of distro's and vendors to get their input on

[openstack-dev] [neutron][fwaas] FWaaS IRC meetings to happen alternate Wed (no mtg today).

2015-06-10 Thread Sridar Kandaswamy (skandasw)
Hi All: Just a reminder to FWaaS meeting attendees, as discussed in last weeks FWaaS IRC [1], with all the PTO’s going on and the need for time to build up on the SG alignment discussions – it was felt that it would be good to go to an alternate week format. So the next meeting will be on Jun

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder][nova] Is volume connection_info modeled/documented anywhere?

2015-06-10 Thread John Griffith
On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 7:54 AM, Matt Riedemann mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote: While investigating/discussing bug 1463525 [1] I remembered how little I know about what can actually come out of the connection_info dict returned from the os-initialize_connection cinder API call. So we added

[openstack-dev] [nova] vif type libvirt-network

2015-06-10 Thread Andreas Scheuring
Hi Daniel, Neil and others, I was thinking about introducing libvirt-network as a new vif type to nova. It can be used when Neutron prepares a libvirt network for attaching guests. Would you see any general concerns with such an approach? Anything that I need to consider with libvirt networks

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic] [Inspector] Toward 2.0.0 release

2015-06-10 Thread Yuiko Takada
Hi, Dmitry, I guess the whole idea of new release models is NOT to tie projects to each other any more except for The Big Release twice a year :) So I think no, we don't need to. We still can do it, if we have something to release by the time Ironic releases, but I suggest deciding it on

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Liberty Priorties for Nova

2015-06-10 Thread Andreas Scheuring
Daniel, if I got it right, the vif script blueprint only is about plug/unplug operations and not about generating new xml representations for vif types. What if for a new vif type it's sufficient to have the get_config_* method updated? In this case plug/unplug would be handled by libvirt (like

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Liberty Process, Deadlines and Dates for Nova

2015-06-10 Thread John Garbutt
On 4 June 2015 at 12:42, John Garbutt j...@johngarbutt.com wrote: Hi, Following up from nova-meetings and this summit session: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/YVR-nova-liberty-process snip With that in mind, does this seem like a good idea? June 12: spec review day (to be confirmed) Note

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack Foundation] Openstack Diversity Working Group

2015-06-10 Thread Tom Fifield
If anyone needs help with the timezone conversion, I recommend http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/meeting.html Just put in Portland and your nearest city into the boxes and you'll get an hour-by-hour breakdown :) On 10/06/15 23:39, Barrett, Carol L wrote: The Doodle time zone doesn’t seem

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [stable] No longer doing stable point releases

2015-06-10 Thread Dave Walker
On 10 June 2015 at 17:06, Fox, Kevin M kevin@pnnl.gov wrote: So... as an op, without release notes, how am I supposed to figure out the proper upgrade procedure's when you often have to lockstep, in the right order, nova+neutron upgrades (or other project combinations)? Thanks, Kevin

Re: [openstack-dev] Openstack Diversity Working Group

2015-06-10 Thread Barrett, Carol L
The Doodle time zone doesn't seem to be appearing in the local timebased upon the viewer. Sorry - The time zone is US/Pacific time (UTC-7), you'll need to do your own conversion. Thanks Carol From: Sousou, Imad [mailto:imad.sou...@intel.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 09, 2015 11:34 AM To:

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder][nova] modeling connection_info with a versioned object in os-brick

2015-06-10 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 10:40:02AM -0500, Matt Riedemann wrote: This is a follow-on to the thread [1] asking about modeling the connection_info dict returned from the os-initialize_connection API. The more I think about modeling that in Nova, the more I think it should really be modeled in

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [stable] No longer doing stable point releases

2015-06-10 Thread Fox, Kevin M
So... as an op, without release notes, how am I supposed to figure out the proper upgrade procedure's when you often have to lockstep, in the right order, nova+neutron upgrades (or other project combinations)? Thanks, Kevin From: Thomas Goirand

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone][barbican] Regarding exposing X-Group-xxxx in token validation

2015-06-10 Thread John Wood
Hello folks, Thanks for the consideration of this feature. Does it seem realistic for a Liberty release of Keystone middleware to expose X-Group-Ids, or would this be an M and beyond sort of thing? Thanks, John From: Henry Nash henryna...@mac.commailto:henryna...@mac.com Reply-To: OpenStack

[openstack-dev] [cinder][nova] modeling connection_info with a versioned object in os-brick

2015-06-10 Thread Matt Riedemann
This is a follow-on to the thread [1] asking about modeling the connection_info dict returned from the os-initialize_connection API. The more I think about modeling that in Nova, the more I think it should really be modeled in Cinder with an oslo.versionedobject since it is an API contract

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone][barbican] Regarding exposing X-Group-xxxx in token validation

2015-06-10 Thread Dolph Mathews
We're aiming for a Spec Proposal Freeze deadline for Liberty of June 23rd, but are requiring that specs are approved by our spec reviewers by that date. The spec [1] is currently pretty straightforward and provides us several benefits, so I don't expect it to be a complicated process, but is

Re: [openstack-dev] [javascript] Linters

2015-06-10 Thread Michael Krotscheck
On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 3:37 PM Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.net wrote: On 10 June 2015 at 04:01, Michael Krotscheck krotsch...@gmail.com wrote: Well, it looks like everyone has disqualified jslint and jshint, so let's just make a decision there and remove them from the running.

Re: [openstack-dev] [Manila] Ask for help on supportting the 3-rd party CI for HDFS driver

2015-06-10 Thread Jeremy Stanley
On 2015-06-10 14:39:46 + (+), yang, xing wrote: You can ask if OpenStack Infrastructure team can set up CI for this driver. They have set up CI's for a few Cinder drivers based on open source storage systems. To be fair, the Infra team hasn't really written the jobs to test those, but

[openstack-dev] Announcing Gertty 1.2.0

2015-06-10 Thread James E. Blair
Announcing Gertty 1.2.0 === Gertty is a console-based interface to the Gerrit Code Review system. Gertty is designed to support a workflow similar to reading network news or mail. It syncs information from Gerrit to local storage to support disconnected operation and easy

[openstack-dev] [murano] backporting changes to stable/juno and stable/kilo

2015-06-10 Thread Kirill Zaitsev
Hi all. I’ve been looking through the bugs/fixes we’ve made during kilo cycle. Some of them are worthy of being backported to stable/juno. And some of the fixes we’ve already made in liberty are worthy of being backported to stable/kilo. Since we’ve agreed on using tags for bugs I’ve marked

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] vif type libvirt-network

2015-06-10 Thread Neil Jerram
On 10/06/15 15:47, Andreas Scheuring wrote: Hi Daniel, Neil and others, I was thinking about introducing libvirt-network as a new vif type to nova. It can be used when Neutron prepares a libvirt network for attaching guests. Would you see any general concerns with such an approach? Anything

Re: [openstack-dev] Proposing Brian Haley to Neutron L3 Core Reviewer Team

2015-06-10 Thread Kyle Mestery
On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 2:11 PM, Carl Baldwin c...@ecbaldwin.net wrote: Folks, As the Neutron L3 Lieutenant [1] under the PTL, Kyle, I'd like to propose Brian Haley as a member of the Neutron L3 core reviewer team. Brian has been a long time contributor in Neutron showing expertise

Re: [openstack-dev] Proposing Brian Haley to Neutron L3 Core Reviewer Team

2015-06-10 Thread Assaf Muller
+1 - Original Message - Folks, As the Neutron L3 Lieutenant [1] under the PTL, Kyle, I'd like to propose Brian Haley as a member of the Neutron L3 core reviewer team. Brian has been a long time contributor in Neutron showing expertise particularly in IPv6, iptables, and Linux

[openstack-dev] [oslo] Adopt mox3

2015-06-10 Thread Davanum Srinivas
Oslo folks, everyone, mox3 needs to be maintained since some of our projects use it and we have it in our global requirements. Here's the proposal from Doug - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/190330/ Any objections? Please chime in here or on the review. thanks, dims -- Davanum Srinivas ::

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-operators][openstack][chef] Pre-release of knife-openstack is out (1.2.0.rc1)

2015-06-10 Thread JJ Asghar
On Jun 4, 2015, at 6:12 PM, JJ Asghar jasg...@chef.io wrote: I have cut a new release of the knife-openstack[1] gem today. We have a couple new features[2] which has been asked for a while. I have pushed another pre-release (1.2.0.rc2) of knife-openstack. The main change is support for

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] vif type libvirt-network

2015-06-10 Thread Neil Jerram
Hi Ian, Thanks for your reply! On 10/06/15 21:07, Ian Wells wrote: I don't see a problem with this, though I think you do want plug/unplug calls to be passed on to Neutron so that has the opportunity to set up the binding from its side (usage 0) and tear it down when you're done with it (usage

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack] [OpenStack Foundation] Openstack Diversity Working Group

2015-06-10 Thread Pete Chadwick
Doodle does this automatically. At least it presented me with what appeared to be US East times. There is a box on the upper right that tells you the time zone and lets you change it. Pete On Wed, 2015-06-10 at 23:43 +0800, Tom Fifield wrote: If anyone needs help with the timezone conversion,

[openstack-dev] Proposing Brian Haley to Neutron L3 Core Reviewer Team

2015-06-10 Thread Carl Baldwin
Folks, As the Neutron L3 Lieutenant [1] under the PTL, Kyle, I'd like to propose Brian Haley as a member of the Neutron L3 core reviewer team. Brian has been a long time contributor in Neutron showing expertise particularly in IPv6, iptables, and Linux kernel matters. His knowledge and

[openstack-dev] Online Migrations.

2015-06-10 Thread Philip Schwartz
All, I am taking over work on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/154521/ from Johanness and have spent some time today discussing the current patchset and what is remaining with Dan and Johannes. I wanted to broach the topic of the remaining development with the lists to make sure we go in the

Re: [openstack-dev] Proposing Brian Haley to Neutron L3 Core Reviewer Team

2015-06-10 Thread Henry Gessau
+1 Brian will be a great addition for L3 On Wed, Jun 10, 2015, Carl Baldwin c...@ecbaldwin.net wrote: Folks, As the Neutron L3 Lieutenant [1] under the PTL, Kyle, I'd like to propose Brian Haley as a member of the Neutron L3 core reviewer team. Brian has been a long time contributor in

Re: [openstack-dev] Online Migrations.

2015-06-10 Thread Philip Schwartz
I like the idea of having a named condition, but the issue is how to maintain and control multiple of these conditions in a system that will use model against current schema to determine changes. I also agree that we should get the current patch in as soon as possible and can move my -1 as a

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Mechanism drivers and Neutron server forking?

2015-06-10 Thread Kyle Mestery
On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 2:25 PM, Neil Jerram neil.jer...@metaswitch.com wrote: On 08/06/15 22:02, Kevin Benton wrote: This depends on what initialize is supposed to be doing. If it's just a one-time sync with a back-end, then I think calling it once in each child process might not be what

Re: [openstack-dev] Online Migrations.

2015-06-10 Thread Dan Smith
The remaining work is to have a way of preventing database contracts from running until data migrations that the column interacts with are complete, this is not an easy problem to solve as the goal of the online migrations is to do pure model based schema migrations and there is no way of

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Mechanism drivers and Neutron server forking?

2015-06-10 Thread Neil Jerram
On 08/06/15 22:02, Kevin Benton wrote: This depends on what initialize is supposed to be doing. If it's just a one-time sync with a back-end, then I think calling it once in each child process might not be what we want. I left a comment on Terry's patch. I think we should just use the

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] [ops][tags][packaging] [tc] ops:packaging tag - a little common sense, please

2015-06-10 Thread Maish Saidel-Keesing
Forgive the top posting. Thank you Jay for your clarification and apology. I wrote the piece below **before** you sent out your email this afternoon, so again this is nothing personal and not targeted at any **specific** person. With that said, I still think that what I have to say is still

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] vif type libvirt-network

2015-06-10 Thread Ian Wells
I don't see a problem with this, though I think you do want plug/unplug calls to be passed on to Neutron so that has the opportunity to set up the binding from its side (usage 0) and tear it down when you're done with it (usage 1). There may be a set of races you need to deal with, too - what

[openstack-dev] [Glance] [all] python-glanceclient release 0.19.0

2015-06-10 Thread Nikhil Komawar
The python-glanceclient release management team is pleased to announce: Release of python-glanceclient version 0.19.0 Please find the details related to the release at: https://launchpad.net/python-glanceclient/liberty/0.19.0https://launchpad.net/python-glanceclient/+milestone/v0.17.0

[openstack-dev] [ops][tags][packaging] ops:packaging tag - a little common sense, please

2015-06-10 Thread Jay Pipes
Cross-posting to -operators and -dev because this involves *packagers* of OpenStack, as well as operators who use those packages. Hello Operators, First, let me start out by saying if you were offended by my snarky comments at yesterday's TC meeting [1] regarding the direction of the Ops

Re: [openstack-dev] [Manila] Ask for help on supportting the 3-rd party CI for HDFS driver

2015-06-10 Thread yang, xing
Thanks Jeremy. I assume Chen could follow this example to add a job for the HDFS driver? https://review.openstack.org/#/c/188744/ Thanks, Xing -Original Message- From: Jeremy Stanley [mailto:fu...@yuggoth.org] Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2015 11:40 AM To: OpenStack Development

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic] weekly meetings and sub-team reports and people

2015-06-10 Thread Jim Rollenhagen
On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 04:33:41PM -0400, Ruby Loo wrote: Hi, I noticed (from reading the logs[1]) that there weren't many folks in this week's weekly meeting. And no cores attended. And the sub-team reports (in our etherpad[2]) were woefully lacking. I guess that means only driver

Re: [openstack-dev] [javascript] Linters

2015-06-10 Thread Robert Collins
On 11 June 2015 at 03:29, Michael Krotscheck krotsch...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 3:37 PM Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.net wrote: There are two package managers in the JavaScript world right now, one that focuses on node.js/server dependencies (karma, lint, express,

Re: [openstack-dev] [ceilometer] polling agent configuration speculation

2015-06-10 Thread Chris Dent
On Tue, 9 Jun 2015, Luo Gangyi wrote: In current, ceilometer load pollsters by agent namespace, So do you mean you want load pollsters one by one through their name(maybe defined in pipeline.yaml)? If loading all pollsters in one time do not cost much, I think your change is bit unnecessary.

Re: [openstack-dev] [Manila] Ask for help on supportting the 3-rd party CI for HDFS driver

2015-06-10 Thread Jeremy Stanley
On 2015-06-10 18:20:24 + (+), yang, xing wrote: Thanks Jeremy. I assume Chen could follow this example to add a job for the HDFS driver? https://review.openstack.org/#/c/188744/ That's a fine short-form answer. The longer answer is to solicit input from some of the people who have

Re: [openstack-dev] [ceilometer] polling agent configuration speculation

2015-06-10 Thread Chris Dent
On Tue, 9 Jun 2015, gordon chung wrote: i still like the idea of splitting polling and processing task. pros: - it moves load off poll agents and onto notificaiton agent - we essentially get free healthcheck events by doing this con: to play devil's advocate. the one down side is that now

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] Proposal for changing 1600UTC meeting to 1700 UTC

2015-06-10 Thread Ryan Hallisey
After some upstream discussion, moving the meeting from 1600 to 1700 UTC does not seem very popular. It was brought up that changing the time to 16:30 UTC could accommodate more people. For the people that attend the 1600 UTC meeting time slot can you post further feedback to address this?

Re: [openstack-dev] [Keystone] Midcycle

2015-06-10 Thread Lance Bragstad
Hi Adam, Do you have any more information on the Boston University dorm situation? On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 1:25 PM, Adam Young ayo...@redhat.com wrote: Keystone Liberty Midcycle Meetup Time and Location When: July 15-17 (Wed-Fri) Where: Boston University, Boston, MA, USA Keystone

  1   2   >