Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] API services available on public VIP

2015-11-16 Thread Matthew Mosesohn
I haven't seen any more discussion on this topic. It looks like since we default to enabling SSL/TLS on deployments, there's no reason to block access to public API endpoints. On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 5:15 PM, Vladimir Kuklin wrote: > Adam > > I think, the answer is

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][sfc] How could an L2 agent extension access agent methods ?

2015-11-16 Thread Paul Carver
On 11/13/2015 7:03 PM, Henry Fourie wrote: I wonder whether just pushing flows into the existing tables at random points in time can be unstable and break the usual flow assumed by the main agent loop. LF> No not expect any issues. Am I making sense? [1]

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [oslo] Please stop removing usedevelop from tox.ini (at least for now)

2015-11-16 Thread Doug Hellmann
Excerpts from Dmitry Tantsur's message of 2015-11-16 12:37:15 +0100: > On 11/16/2015 12:28 PM, Davanum Srinivas wrote: > > Dmitry, > > > > i was trying to bring sanity to the tox.ini(s). +1 to documenting this > > step somewhere prominent. > > Please don't get me wrong, I really appreciate it.

[openstack-dev] REST API collation and visualization

2015-11-16 Thread Neil Jerram
Hi there, I'm interested in collating all the REST API exchanges to and between OpenStack components, and presenting / visualizing all those in an easily comprehensible way. Is there already some tool to do that? Many thanks, Neil

[openstack-dev] [all] [ptls] Time to make some assertions about your projects

2015-11-16 Thread Thierry Carrez
Hi PTLs, Over the last months the Technical Committee defined a number of "assert" tags which are assertions that project teams make about their own deliverables: * assert:follows-standard-deprecation * assert:supports-upgrade * assert:supports-rolling-upgrade You can find their definition at:

[openstack-dev] [Fuel] Deprecation of GRE network segmentation in Fuel 8.0

2015-11-16 Thread Artem Roma
Hi all! AFAIK, GRE network segmentation option has been deprecated for clusters with Neutron since 7.0 release, both on UI and Library side. One still can use the option via CLI as no relevant changes were made to Nailgun API. Though appropriate warning is displayed in the case. So I wanted to

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic] Do we need to have a mid-cycle?

2015-11-16 Thread gord chung
in Liberty, we did a virtual meetup in for the telemetry team so i thought i'd share experience. On 16/11/2015 9:05 AM, Jim Rollenhagen wrote: Then we can set up some hangouts (or similar) to get people in the same "room" working on things. Time zones will get weird, but we tend to hangouts is

[openstack-dev] [Neutron] Team meeting this Tuesday at 1400 UTC

2015-11-16 Thread Armando M.
Hi folks, A kind reminder for tomorrow's meeting. Please add agenda items to the meeting here [1]. Cheers, Armando [1] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Network/Meetings __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack][devstack]Openstack devstack installation failing.

2015-11-16 Thread Sean M. Collins
Attach to the screen session Devstack sets up, and verify that the Nova compute service is running. It's running in the screen session named n-api. -- Sean M. Collins __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage

Re: [openstack-dev] [freezer] Proposal to add Pierre-Arthur Mathieu to freezer-core

2015-11-16 Thread Fresco, Fabrizio
+1 Fabrizio From: Marzi, Fausto Sent: 13 November 2015 16:45 To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: [openstack-dev] [freezer] Proposal to add Pierre-Arthur Mathieu to freezer-core Hi All, I'd like to propose Pierre as core in Freezer. Pierre

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][all] Oslo libraries dropping python 2.6 compatability

2015-11-16 Thread Doug Hellmann
Excerpts from Davanum Srinivas (dims)'s message of 2015-11-16 09:23:39 -0500: > Gordon, > > When we stop the py26 jobs, the next version we release should have > major bumps by semver definition. liberty does not have version caps > unfortunately, but i'll let Doug and others chime in on that. >

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] Graduate cliutils.py into oslo.utils

2015-11-16 Thread Doug Hellmann
Excerpts from Kekane, Abhishek's message of 2015-11-16 07:33:48 +: > Hi, > > As apiclient is now removed from oslo-incubator, to proceed with request-id > spec [1] I have two options in mind, > > > 1. Use keystoneauth1 + cliff in all python-clients (add request-id > support in cliff

[openstack-dev] [tripleo] When to use parameters vs parameter_defaults

2015-11-16 Thread Steven Hardy
Hi all, I wanted to start some discussion re $subject, because it's been apparrent that we have a lack of clarity on this issue (and have done ever since we started using parameter_defaults). Some context: - Historically TripleO has provided a fairly comprehensive "top level" parameters

[openstack-dev] [release] making release notes jobs voting

2015-11-16 Thread Doug Hellmann
Now that we have several projects successfully using reno, and notes are being published, we are going to turn the release notes jobs back to voting and add a job to the gate queue. If you have issues in your project with the job passing, please add a follow-up to the patch that changes the

Re: [openstack-dev] [api] consolidate IRC change with #openstack-sdk?

2015-11-16 Thread michael mccune
On 11/16/2015 09:42 AM, Sean Dague wrote: On 11/16/2015 09:34 AM, michael mccune wrote: On 11/13/2015 07:58 AM, Sean Dague wrote: The #openstack-api IRC channel is quite quiet most days. As such it's not something that people are regularly checking in on, or often forget about (I know I've

Re: [openstack-dev] [freezer] Proposal to add Eldar Nugaev to freezer-core

2015-11-16 Thread Fresco, Fabrizio
+1 From: Marzi, Fausto Sent: 13 November 2015 16:39 To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: [openstack-dev] [freezer] Proposal to add Eldar Nugaev to freezer-core Hi All, I'd like to propose Eldar as core in Freezer, as his help, dedication and contribution

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible][security] Next steps: openstack-ansible-security

2015-11-16 Thread Major Hayden
On 11/16/2015 07:47 AM, Jesse Pretorius wrote: > Based on the spec's proposed change section [1] I would say that items 4 & 5 > are the next steps. Those steps, however, are kind-of waiting for the gate > split work. Perhaps the best way to get this done that doesn't have the > dependency is to

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible][security] Next steps: openstack-ansible-security

2015-11-16 Thread Jesse Pretorius
On 9 November 2015 at 19:38, Major Hayden wrote: > > What would you propose as the final steps to get the blueprint marked as > completed? Should documentation be added into openstack-ansible about > integrating openstack-ansible-security or should a script be provided for >

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][neutron][upgrade] Grenade multinode partial upgrade

2015-11-16 Thread Sean Dague
On 11/16/2015 06:57 AM, Korzeniewski, Artur wrote: > Thanks Sean D. for explanation! > > > > I’ve taken a look into old Russell patches, and it seems that the > project-config was already modified by him: > > Add check-grenade-dsvm-partial-ncpu-neutron: (project-config) > >

[openstack-dev] [nova] config options: location and help text

2015-11-16 Thread Markus Zoeller
target audience === * Code contributors who introduce new or change existing config options * Newbies who are looking for a starter friendly task Why am I receiving this? With bp [1] we got some aggreement on how we should handle the config options of Nova.

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] config options: location and help text

2015-11-16 Thread Markus Zoeller
Markus Zoeller/Germany/IBM@IBMDE wrote on 11/16/2015 02:37:14 PM: > From: Markus Zoeller/Germany/IBM@IBMDE > To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" > > Date: 11/16/2015 02:38 PM > Subject: [openstack-dev] [nova] config options:

[openstack-dev] [mistral] Team meeting - 11/16/2015

2015-11-16 Thread Renat Akhmerov
Hi, This is just a reminder that we’ll have a team meeting today at #openstack-meeting at 16.00 UTC. Agenda: Review action items Current status (progress, issues, roadblocks, further plans) Open discussion Put your own items at https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/MistralAgenda

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] Converting the AIO bootstrap script to Ansible

2015-11-16 Thread Jesse Pretorius
On 6 November 2015 at 21:34, Major Hayden wrote: > Feel free to critique it and I'll get to work on making the changes. The > spec[2] should answer most of the questions about the effort. > > Thanks! :) > > [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/239525/ > [2] >

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][all] Oslo libraries dropping python 2.6 compatability

2015-11-16 Thread Davanum Srinivas
Gordon, When we stop the py26 jobs, the next version we release should have major bumps by semver definition. liberty does not have version caps unfortunately, but i'll let Doug and others chime in on that. yes, i know major bumps are hard thanks, dims On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 9:07 AM, gord

Re: [openstack-dev] [api] consolidate IRC change with #openstack-sdk?

2015-11-16 Thread michael mccune
On 11/13/2015 07:58 AM, Sean Dague wrote: The #openstack-api IRC channel is quite quiet most days. As such it's not something that people are regularly checking in on, or often forget about (I know I've been guilty of that). Plus we don't always have the right people in a conversation to make a

Re: [openstack-dev] [api] consolidate IRC change with #openstack-sdk?

2015-11-16 Thread Sean Dague
On 11/16/2015 09:34 AM, michael mccune wrote: > On 11/13/2015 07:58 AM, Sean Dague wrote: >> The #openstack-api IRC channel is quite quiet most days. As such it's >> not something that people are regularly checking in on, or often forget >> about (I know I've been guilty of that). Plus we don't

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic] Do we need to have a mid-cycle?

2015-11-16 Thread Jim Rollenhagen
On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 12:16:34PM -0500, Ruby Loo wrote: > On 10 November 2015 at 12:08, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: > > > On 11/10/2015 05:45 PM, Lucas Alvares Gomes wrote: > > > >> Hi, > >> > >> In the last Ironic meeting [1] we started a discussion about whether > >> we need

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][all] Oslo libraries dropping python 2.6 compatability

2015-11-16 Thread gord chung
do we require a major versioning bump for this? i'm wondering how 'breaking' this is in real life if all the services have dropped py2.6 already. maybe this just requires an upper-cap in appropriate stable branches? to be devils advocate, one (arguably terrible) reason for not doing a major

Re: [openstack-dev] [stackalytics] Review metrics: average numbers

2015-11-16 Thread Alexis Lee
Hi Mike, Not 100% sure what you're asking for but have you seen these stats? http://russellbryant.net/openstack-stats/ Alexis (lxsli) -- Nova developer, Hewlett-Packard Limited. Registered Office: Cain Road, Bracknell, Berkshire RG12 1HN. Registered Number: 00690597 England VAT number: GB

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][all] Oslo libraries dropping python 2.6 compatability

2015-11-16 Thread Robert Collins
Yes, major version bump. As long as we don't have to change any consumers, we have no backwards compatibility concerns because we deprecated 2.6 in Juno. However i suspect we will have to change consumers specifically we still had 2.6 jobs in liberty On 17 Nov 2015 3:23 AM, "Davanum Srinivas"

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable] Making stable maintenance its own OpenStack project team

2015-11-16 Thread Dave Walker
On 13 November 2015 at 14:10, Thierry Carrez wrote: > So.. quick summary of this thread so far. > > (-) > * Not enough work to warrant a designated "team", now that the work is > decentralized and the cats are mostly herding themselves > * The change is unlikely to bring a

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic][Nova][Neutron] Multi-tenancy support

2015-11-16 Thread Vasyl Saienko
Hello Community, There is 'raw' version of Generic ML2 Driver [0]. It uses 'Netmiko' [1] library. At the moment it supports Cisco Catalyst switches but it can be easily extended with ANY ssh enabled switch. [0] https://github.com/jumpojoy/neutron [1] https://github.com/ktbyers/netmiko On Wed,

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][ironic] Ironic-Neutron meeting cancellation notice

2015-11-16 Thread Ruby Loo
On 15 November 2015 at 16:47, Sukhdev Kapur wrote: > Folks, > > We are canceling this week's Ironic-neutron integration meeting. I have a > family obligation to take care of and I have not been able to find a > replacement person who can chair this meeting. Therefore, we

[openstack-dev] [neutron][networking-sfc] Deploying current networking-sfc

2015-11-16 Thread Duarte Cardoso, Igor
Hi networking-sfc folks, I can't seem to be able to deploy the current networking-sfc using DevStack and my hint is that the latest review stack is dependent on previous patches that have not been updated/rebased yet ([1] and [2]) - and are depending on outdated patches. In [3] you can see

[openstack-dev] [ironic] weekly subteam status report

2015-11-16 Thread Ruby Loo
Hi, We are stoked to present this week's subteam report for Ironic. As usual, this is pulled directly from the Ironic whiteboard[0] and formatted. Bugs (dtantsur) (diff with Nov 9) - Open: 167 (-4). 10 new (-2), 61 in progress (-2), 0 critical, 14 high and 11 incomplete (+1) - Nova

Re: [openstack-dev] [puppet] weekly meeting #59

2015-11-16 Thread Iury Gregory
Hi Emilien, the link for the agenda is https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/puppet-openstack-weekly-meeting-2015111 or https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/puppet-openstack-weekly-meeting-20151117 ? Thanks o/ 2015-11-16 14:04 GMT-03:00 Emilien Macchi : > Hello! > > Here's an

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] When to use parameters vs parameter_defaults

2015-11-16 Thread Giulio Fidente
On 11/16/2015 04:25 PM, Steven Hardy wrote: Hi all, I wanted to start some discussion re $subject, because it's been apparrent that we have a lack of clarity on this issue (and have done ever since we started using parameter_defaults). [...] How do people feel about this example, and others

[openstack-dev] [puppet] weekly meeting #59

2015-11-16 Thread Emilien Macchi
Hello! Here's an initial agenda for our weekly meeting, Tuesday at 1500 UTC in #openstack-meeting-4: https :// etherpad.openstack.org

Re: [openstack-dev] REST API collation and visualization

2015-11-16 Thread Neil Jerram
On 16/11/15 16:37, Neil Jerram wrote: > Hi there, > > I'm interested in collating all the REST API exchanges to and between > OpenStack components, and presenting / visualizing all those in an > easily comprehensible way. Is there already some tool to do that? > > Many thanks, > Neil Well

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic] Quick poll: OpenStackClient command for provision action

2015-11-16 Thread Ruby Loo
On 10 November 2015 at 11:31, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: > On 11/10/2015 05:21 PM, Brad P. Crochet wrote: > >> On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 4:09 AM, Dmitry Tantsur >> wrote: >> >>> Hi all! >>> >>> I'd like to seek consensus (or at least some opinions) on patch

Re: [openstack-dev] REST API collation and visualization

2015-11-16 Thread Neil Jerram
On 16/11/15 17:54, Neil Jerram wrote: > On 16/11/15 16:37, Neil Jerram wrote: >> Hi there, >> >> I'm interested in collating all the REST API exchanges to and between >> OpenStack components, and presenting / visualizing all those in an >> easily comprehensible way. Is there already some tool to

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Running Fuel node as non-superuser

2015-11-16 Thread Dmitry Nikishov
Hello folks, I have updated the spec, please review and share your thoughts on it: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/243340/ Thanks. On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 10:42 AM, Dmitry Nikishov wrote: > Matthew, > > sorry, didn't mean to butcher your name :( > > On Thu, Nov 12,

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic][Nova][Neutron] Multi-tenancy support

2015-11-16 Thread Sean M. Collins
On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 12:47:13PM EST, Vasyl Saienko wrote: > [0] https://github.com/jumpojoy/neutron The way you created the repository in GitHub, it is impossible to diff it against master to see what you did. https://github.com/jumpojoy/neutron/compare -- Sean M. Collins

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][neutron][upgrade] Grenade multinode partial upgrade

2015-11-16 Thread Sean M. Collins
Chatted with Sean D. on IRC, pushed up a patch https://review.openstack.org/#/c/245862/ -- Sean M. Collins __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe:

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [oslo] Please stop removing usedevelop from tox.ini (at least for now)

2015-11-16 Thread gord chung
On 16/11/2015 11:13 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote: does anyone want to sign up to remove that last namespace package? already in action: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/243255/ -- gord __ OpenStack Development Mailing

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [oslo] Please stop removing usedevelop from tox.ini (at least for now)

2015-11-16 Thread Doug Hellmann
Excerpts from gord chung's message of 2015-11-16 12:04:27 -0500: > > On 16/11/2015 11:13 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote: > > does anyone want to sign up to remove that last > > namespace package? > already in action: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/243255/ > Thanks, Gordon!

[openstack-dev] [Glance] M-1 Bugs/Reviews squash day

2015-11-16 Thread Flavio Percoco
Greetings, At our last meeting, we discussed the idea of having a Bug/Reviews squash day before the end of M-1. I'm sending this email out to propose that we do this work on one of the following dates: - Friday November 20th (ALL TZs) - Monday November 23rd (ALL TZs) I realize that next week

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][networking-sfc] Deploying current networking-sfc

2015-11-16 Thread Cathy Zhang
Networking-sfc not just a shell. It has API, DB, DB Migration, Common Driver Manager, OVS Driver, OVS Agent, CLI, Horizon etc. codes uploaded for review for over one month. The project team is in the final review stage. And a patch for adding DevStack support for networking-sfc has also been

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][networking-sfc] Deploying current networking-sfc

2015-11-16 Thread Cathy Zhang
Hi Duarte, We have just rebased the patches. We are in the stage of more comprehensive testing, bug fixes, review, and incorporating review comments. The code patches including the devstack patch will be merged once they are properly reviewed, and you can then download and deploy this

[openstack-dev] [DefCore] Request for comments: Is booting Linux VM required for OpenStack interoperability?

2015-11-16 Thread Egle Sigler
Hello Everyone, DefCore committee would like to hear your input on this issue: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/244782/ The issue is not really vendor specific. At the heart of the issue is this question: for interoperability reasons, should certified OpenStack powered compute clouds be able

Re: [openstack-dev] [tacker] Proposing Sripriya Seetharam to Tacker core

2015-11-16 Thread Sripriya Seetharam
Thank you. Will try to do my best! -Sripriya From: Sridhar Ramaswamy [mailto:sric...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, November 16, 2015 11:42 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [tacker] Proposing Sripriya

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][networking-sfc] Deploying current networking-sfc

2015-11-16 Thread Kyle Mestery
On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 4:03 PM, Russell Bryant wrote: > On 11/16/2015 01:42 PM, Sean M. Collins wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 04:11:42PM EST, Paul Carver wrote: > >> This is a challenge. Personally, I haven't been able to get it all > working > >> yet. But we're in a

[openstack-dev] [OSSN 0059] Trusted VM can be powered on untrusted hosts

2015-11-16 Thread Nathan Kinder
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Trusted VM can be powered on untrusted hosts - --- ### Summary ### A trusted VM that has been launched earlier on a trusted host can still be powered on from the same host even after the trusted host is compromised. ### Affected Services /

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][networking-sfc] Deploying current networking-sfc

2015-11-16 Thread Sean M. Collins
On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 04:11:42PM EST, Paul Carver wrote: > This is a challenge. Personally, I haven't been able to get it all working > yet. But we're in a dilemma because we want to get good reviews of the code > before merging. Since the full functionality is quite a lot of code we > wanted to

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][networking-sfc] Deploying current networking-sfc

2015-11-16 Thread Russell Bryant
On 11/16/2015 01:42 PM, Sean M. Collins wrote: > On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 04:11:42PM EST, Paul Carver wrote: >> This is a challenge. Personally, I haven't been able to get it all working >> yet. But we're in a dilemma because we want to get good reviews of the code >> before merging. Since the full

[openstack-dev] [Oslo] Virtual sprint! End of this week!! (get'm while they are hot)

2015-11-16 Thread Joshua Harlow
Howdy folks, This week the oslo team will be offering a one time deal that everyone will be interested in! We will be offering 100% off on documentation changes during this week's documentation (*virtual*) sprint[1]. Starting this Thursday and Friday we will (as a group/team) be accepting all

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][networking-sfc] Deploying current networking-sfc

2015-11-16 Thread Sean M. Collins
Networking-sfc is still just a shell - there is no functional code. -- Sean M. Collins __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe:

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][sfc] How could an L2 agent extension access agent methods ?

2015-11-16 Thread Cathy Zhang
I have updated the etherpad to add "Overall requirement - API cross check among the features that can manipulate the same flow's forwarding behavior". Thanks, Cathy -Original Message- From: Paul Carver [mailto:pcar...@paulcarver.us] Sent: Monday, November 16, 2015 7:50 AM To: OpenStack

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] When to use parameters vs parameter_defaults

2015-11-16 Thread Jay Dobies
Hi all, I wanted to start some discussion re $subject, because it's been apparrent that we have a lack of clarity on this issue (and have done ever since we started using parameter_defaults). Some context: - Historically TripleO has provided a fairly comprehensive "top level" parameters

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Location of TripleO REST API

2015-11-16 Thread Jay Dobies
On 11/10/2015 10:08 AM, Tzu-Mainn Chen wrote: Hi all, At the last IRC meeting it was agreed that the new TripleO REST API should forgo the Tuskar name, and simply be called... the TripleO API. There's one more point of discussion: where should the API live? There are two possibilities: a)

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][networking-sfc] Deploying current networking-sfc

2015-11-16 Thread Paul Carver
On 11/16/2015 3:39 PM, Sean M. Collins wrote: Networking-sfc is still just a shell - there is no functional code. To be more clear, most of the code has not yet been merged. Click here for a link to all the pending reviews that contain lots of functional code targetted at merging into the

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic][Nova][Neutron] Multi-tenancy support

2015-11-16 Thread Jim Rollenhagen
On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 06:38:28PM +, Sean M. Collins wrote: > On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 12:47:13PM EST, Vasyl Saienko wrote: > > [0] https://github.com/jumpojoy/neutron > > The way you created the repository in GitHub, it is impossible to diff > it against master to see what you did. > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel][Infra] HA deployment tests on nodepool

2015-11-16 Thread James E. Blair
Aleksandra Fedorova writes: > Hi, everyone, > > > > in Fuel project we run two HA deployment tests for every commit in > openstack/fuel-library repository. Currently these tests are run by > Fuel CI - the standalone Third-Party CI system, which can vote on >

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Deprecation of GRE network segmentation in Fuel 8.0

2015-11-16 Thread Igor Kalnitsky
Hey Artem, > GRE network segmentation option has been deprecated for clusters > with Neutron since 7.0 release, both on UI and Library side What do you mean by "deprecated"? Was it removed? If so, why did we have a chance to create GRE if it wasn't supported? If so, we definitely have to forbid

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [oslo] Please stop removing usedevelop from tox.ini (at least for now)

2015-11-16 Thread Dmitry Tantsur
On 11/16/2015 12:28 PM, Davanum Srinivas wrote: Dmitry, i was trying to bring sanity to the tox.ini(s). +1 to documenting this step somewhere prominent. Please don't get me wrong, I really appreciate it. I'm not sure why "usedevelop" is not the default, though. Maybe we at least make sure to

Re: [openstack-dev] [networking-ovs-dpdk] ovs-appctl doesn't function correctly

2015-11-16 Thread Hui Xiang
That is helpful, thanks Sean ! On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 7:12 PM, Mooney, Sean K wrote: > To use the ovs-appctl application you have to specify the socket path to > the ovs-vswitchd process. > > ovs-appctl -t /var/run/openvswitch/ list-commands > > e.g. > > ovs-appctl -t

Re: [openstack-dev] [networking-ovs-dpdk]

2015-11-16 Thread Prathyusha Guduri
Hi Sean, Thanks for your response. in your case though you are using 1GB hugepages so I don’t think this is related to memory fragmentation or a lack of free hugepages. to use preallocated 1GB page with ovs you should instead set the following in your local.conf

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] Questions about BP for enable/disable heat-engine

2015-11-16 Thread Manickam, Kanagaraj
Ethan Lynn, This blue-print has two parts , one to perform the graceful-shutdown to make sure all IN_PROGRESS resources/stacks in the given engine to reach its final state.. Other one, expose this feature as disable engine to support the maintenance. I was planning to re-write the spec to

Re: [openstack-dev] [All] Use of self signed certs in endpoints

2015-11-16 Thread Sean Dague
On 11/16/2015 01:03 AM, Jamie Lennox wrote: > > > On 14 November 2015 at 19:09, Xav Paice > wrote: > > Hi, > > I'm sure I'm not the only one that likes to use SSL everywhere > possible, and doesn't like to pay for 'real' ssl certs

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][neutron][upgrade] Grenade multinode partial upgrade

2015-11-16 Thread Korzeniewski, Artur
Thanks Sean D. for explanation! I’ve taken a look into old Russell patches, and it seems that the project-config was already modified by him: Add check-grenade-dsvm-partial-ncpu-neutron: (project-config) https://review.openstack.org/#/c/189426 Add check-grenade-dsvm-partial-ncpu-neutron-dvr

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][testing-cabal] Help needed getting oslo.versionedobjects to install in tox venv

2015-11-16 Thread Robert Collins
On 17 November 2015 at 16:25, Jay Pipes wrote: > On 11/15/2015 08:10 PM, Robert Collins wrote: ... > > Thanks, Robert, but unfortunately that didn't work. I still get the same > problem: > > Downloading/unpacking .[fixtures] > Could not find any downloads that satisfy the

Re: [openstack-dev] [puppet] weekly meeting #59

2015-11-16 Thread Emilien Macchi
The second one. Sorry for confusion, I sent it from my phone. See you tomorrow! --- Emilien Macchi On Nov 16, 2015 1:24 PM, "Iury Gregory" wrote: > Hi Emilien, the link for the agenda is > https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/puppet-openstack-weekly-meeting-2015111 > or >

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][testing-cabal] Help needed getting oslo.versionedobjects to install in tox venv

2015-11-16 Thread Jay Pipes
Just a quick note to say thank you to Robert, who helped me through my troubles on #openstack-dev. Robert, you rock. Thanks much! FWIW, the problem was indeed a bad version of virtualenv (the old Ubuntu one), and this is what I needed to do to resolve the issue: sudo apt-get remove -y

[openstack-dev] [Infra] Meeting Tuesday November 17th at 19:00 UTC

2015-11-16 Thread Elizabeth K. Joseph
Hi everyone, The OpenStack Infrastructure (Infra) team is having our next weekly meeting on Tuesday November 17th, at 19:00 UTC in #openstack-meeting Meeting agenda available here: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/InfraTeamMeeting#Agenda_for_next_meeting Anyone is welcome to to add

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][networking-sfc] Deploying current networking-sfc

2015-11-16 Thread Cathy Zhang
Hi Kyle, Thanks for adding patch [3] to clarify the current API status. Cathy From: Kyle Mestery [mailto:mest...@mestery.com] Sent: Monday, November 16, 2015 2:16 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][networking-sfc] Deploying

[openstack-dev] [Oslo] taskflow 2.0 and its changes

2015-11-16 Thread Joshua Harlow
Since I am hoping to get taskflow 2.0 out in mitaka I wanted to share with folks some of the debt collected items that have been/are scheduled for removal. Most of these have been removed in 6+ months (some have been around from 2014) and with the 2.0 release it seems like the best time to

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable] Preparing 2014.2.4 (Juno) WAS Re: [Openstack-operators] [stable][all] Keeping Juno "alive" for longer.

2015-11-16 Thread Rochelle Grober
I would like to make a plea that while Juno is locked down so as no changes can be made against it, the branch remains on the git.openstack.org site. Please? One area that could be better investigated with the branch in place is upgrade. Kilo will continue to get patches, as will Liberty, so

Re: [openstack-dev] [Barbican] Enabling GET of secrets to work irrespective of Tenant name in login

2015-11-16 Thread Dave McCowan (dmccowan)
Hi Vijay-- The recommended way for supporting that use case is to use Barbican's ACLs. It allows user's from another project/tenant to access specific secrets If the "demo admin" owns a secret and wants to give read access to "admin admin", the "demo admin" should create a ACL for the

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable] Preparing 2014.2.4 (Juno) WAS Re: [Openstack-operators] [stable][all] Keeping Juno "alive" for longer.

2015-11-16 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 11/16/2015 8:49 PM, Rochelle Grober wrote: I would like to make a plea that while Juno is locked down so as no changes can be made against it, the branch remains on the git.openstack.org site. Please? One area that could be better investigated with the branch in place is upgrade. Kilo

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][testing-cabal] Help needed getting oslo.versionedobjects to install in tox venv

2015-11-16 Thread Jay Pipes
On 11/15/2015 08:10 PM, Robert Collins wrote: On 16 November 2015 at 15:29, Jay Pipes wrote: Hi all, Really getting frustrated with a particular problem. I'm trying to build oslo.versionedobjects locally (this problem occurs on both my lappie and my desktop, running Ubuntu

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] [Fuel UI] Support of separate provisioning is blocked by backend issues

2015-11-16 Thread Igor Kalnitsky
Hey Julia, Thank you for feedback. I took a look over the bug and here's my thoughts: * [1] Looks like Invalid to me. I'm not sure, but it looks like you VMs just wrongly configures. It's a pretty common mistake for VBox scripts. Did you use them? * [2] Partially Invalid. I left my comments, so

[openstack-dev] [murano]How to use Murano to transmit files to Mistral and execute scripts on Mistral

2015-11-16 Thread WANG, Ming Hao (Tony T)
Dear Murano developers and testers, I want to put some files that Mistral workflow needs into Murano package, and hope Murano can transmit them to Mistral before it calls Mistral workflow. The flow should be as following: 1. User uploads one Murano package which includes both

[openstack-dev] [nova] Nova API sub-team meeting

2015-11-16 Thread Alex Xu
Hi, We have weekly Nova API meeting this week. The meeting is being held Tuesday UTC1200. The proposed agenda and meeting details are here: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/NovaAPI Please feel free to add items to the agenda. Thanks Alex

[openstack-dev] [QA][Tempest] Deprecate or drop about Tempest CLI

2015-11-16 Thread Masayuki Igawa
Hi tempest CLI users and developers, Now, we are improving Tempest CLI as we discussed at the summit[1] and migrating legacy commands to tempest cli[2]. In this situation, my concern is 'CLI compatibility'. If we'll drop old CLIs support(like my patch), it might break existing workflows. So I

Re: [openstack-dev] [Horizon] Handling of 202 response code

2015-11-16 Thread Saravanan KR
Thanks Matthias for educating me. As there is no universal solution to this issue, I will check if launch instance page strategy will work out for this case. Regards, Saravanan KR On 11/04/2015 03:47 PM, Matthias Runge wrote: On 04/11/15 09:25, Saravanan KR wrote: There may be multiple

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][heat][magnum] LBaaS of Neutron

2015-11-16 Thread Egor Guz
Eli, you are correct Swarm support only one active/passive deployment model, but according to Docker documentation https://docs.docker.com/swarm/multi-manager-setup/ even replica can handle user request “You can use the docker command on any Docker Swarm primary manager or any replica." it

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][heat][magnum] LBaaS of Neutron

2015-11-16 Thread Qiao,Liyong
Egor, thanks for pointing me out, I read it before, I didn't notice that words. hmm.. then that would be fine On 2015年11月16日 16:28, Egor Guz wrote: Eli, you are correct Swarm support only one active/passive deployment model, but according to Docker documentation

[openstack-dev] [cross-project] Return request-id to caller - Step 1

2015-11-16 Thread Kekane, Abhishek
Hi Devs, As per mentioned in cross-project specs [1] 'Proposed Change' section, I would like to proceed with adding 'request-id' attribute to base exception class. request-id is most needed when api returns anything >= 400 error code. As of now python-cinderclient, python-keystoneclient and

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] Graduate cliutils.py into oslo.utils

2015-11-16 Thread Victor Stinner
Le 16/11/2015 08:33, Kekane, Abhishek a écrit : Hi, As apiclient is now removed from oslo-incubator, to proceed with request-id spec [1] I have two options in mind, 1.Use keystoneauth1 + cliff in all python-clients (add request-id support in cliff library) 2.apiclient code is available in all

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][api] New API Guidelines Ready for Cross Project Review

2015-11-16 Thread Thierry Carrez
Everett Toews wrote: > The following API guidelines are ready for cross project review. They will be > merged on Nov. 20 if there's no further feedback. > [...] I see you added this topic for the next cross-project meeting. Would you mind chairing that meeting ? I'm traveling with limited

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [oslo] Please stop removing usedevelop from tox.ini (at least for now)

2015-11-16 Thread Julien Danjou
On Mon, Nov 16 2015, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: > Before you ask: using 'sudo pip install -U setuptools pbr' is out of question > in binary distributions :) so please make sure to remove this line only when > everyone is updated to whatever version is required for understanding these >

Re: [openstack-dev] [designate] Records for floating addresses are not removed when an instance is removed

2015-11-16 Thread Jaime Fernández
Thanks Matt. The link was very useful. However, I couldn't make it work. The event 'port.delete.end' has the following payload: > {u'port_id': u'86580146-1772-4e32-8d7b-92bbb9131ae5'} > It only provides the port_id. But without the tenant_id, I cannot get the context associated to the tenant.

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [oslo] Please stop removing usedevelop from tox.ini (at least for now)

2015-11-16 Thread Dmitry Tantsur
On 11/16/2015 11:35 AM, Julien Danjou wrote: On Mon, Nov 16 2015, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: Before you ask: using 'sudo pip install -U setuptools pbr' is out of question in binary distributions :) so please make sure to remove this line only when everyone is updated to whatever version is required

[openstack-dev] [Nova] notification subteam meeting

2015-11-16 Thread Balázs Gibizer
Hi, The next meeting of the nova notification subteam will happen 2015-11-17 Tuesday 20:00 UTC [1] on #openstack-meeting-alt on freenode Agenda: - Status of the outstanding specs and code reviews - AOB See you there. Cheers, Gibi [1]

[openstack-dev] [networking-ovs-dpdk] ovs-appctl doesn't function correctly

2015-11-16 Thread Hui Xiang
Hi all, I have managed to setup ovs-dpdk on Ubuntu, commands 'ovs-vsctl/ovs-ofctl' all work well excep 'ovs-appctl', could anyone help me to figure it out? Thanks in advance. xianghui@xianghui:~$ sudo ovs-ofctl show br-int OFPT_FEATURES_REPLY (xid=0x2): dpid:264fa4e1f24f n_tables:254,

[openstack-dev] [all] [oslo] Please stop removing usedevelop from tox.ini (at least for now)

2015-11-16 Thread Dmitry Tantsur
Hi all! I've seen a couple of patches removing "usedevelop = true" from tox.ini. This has 2 nasty consequences: 1. It's harder to manually experiment in tox environment, as you have to explicitly use 'tox' command every time you change code 2. The most important, it breaks tox invocation for

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] hackathon day

2015-11-16 Thread Rosa, Andrea (HP Cloud Services)
Hi, > -Original Message- > From: Wang, Shane [mailto:shane.w...@intel.com] > Sent: 12 November 2015 16:34 > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions); Daniel P. > Berrange; Bhargava, Ruchi > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] hackathon day > > Hey, how about

Re: [openstack-dev] [networking-ovs-dpdk]

2015-11-16 Thread Mooney, Sean K
Hi Yes sorry for the delay in responding to you and samta. In your case assuming you are using 2mb hugepages it is easy to hit dpdks default max memory segments This can be changed by setting OVS_DPDK_MEM_SEGMENTS= In the local.conf and recompiling. To do this simply remove the build complete

Re: [openstack-dev] [networking-ovs-dpdk] ovs-appctl doesn't function correctly

2015-11-16 Thread Mooney, Sean K
To use the ovs-appctl application you have to specify the socket path to the ovs-vswitchd process. ovs-appctl -t /var/run/openvswitch/ list-commands e.g. ovs-appctl -t /var/run/openvswitch/ovs-vswitchd.10110.ctl list-commands From: Hui Xiang [mailto:hui.xi...@canonical.com] Sent: Monday,

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [oslo] Please stop removing usedevelop from tox.ini (at least for now)

2015-11-16 Thread Davanum Srinivas
Dmitry, i was trying to bring sanity to the tox.ini(s). +1 to documenting this step somewhere prominent. -- Dims On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 5:37 AM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: > On 11/16/2015 11:35 AM, Julien Danjou wrote: >> >> On Mon, Nov 16 2015, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: >> >>>

  1   2   >