Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] [devstack] [infra] heat api services with uwsgi

On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 9:24 AM, Rabi Mishra wrote: > On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 11:57 PM, Zane Bitter wrote: > >> On 23/05/17 01:23, Rabi Mishra wrote: >> >>> Hi All, >>> >>> As per the updated community goal[1] for api deployment with wsgi, >>> we've to

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Onboarding rooms postmortem, what did you do, what worked, lessons learned

*Project: * Heat *Attendees:* around 10-15 *PPT:* https://www.slideshare.net/GuanYuLin1/heat-project-onboarding *Videos: * https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLIKe-Yb1IV6ETK3HKc7mz8kEtawxlvxJh *Talker:* Rico Lin and Zane Bitter *Who we targeting:* We try to make this usable for new

[openstack-dev] [cyborg]Nominate Rushil Chugh and Justin Kilpatrick as new core reviewers

Hi Team, This is an email for nomination of rushil and justin to the core team. They have been very active in our development and the specs they helped draft have been merged after several rounds of review. The statistics could be found at

Re: [openstack-dev] [Massively distributed] Optimizing the interaction of OpenStack components

On 5/24/2017 9:59 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote: I started going down a path the other night of trying to see if we could bulk query floating IPs when building the internal instance network info cache [1] but it looks like that's not supported. The REST API docs for Neutron say that you can't OR

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa] Create subnetpool on dynamic credentials

Hi Andrea, Sorry I just got a chance to get back to this. Yes, an advantage is creating/deleting subnetpool once instead of creating/deleting per test. It seems neutron doesn’t support setting subnetpool_id after a subnet is created. If this is true, it means we cannot leverage the pre-created

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone][nova][cinder][glance][neutron][horizon][policy] defining admin-ness

On 25/05/17 07:47, Lance Bragstad wrote: > *Option 2* > > Implement global role assignments in keystone. > / > / > /How it works:/ > / > / > Role assignments in keystone can be scoped to global context. Users > can then ask for a globally scoped token > > Pros: > - This approach represents a

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Onboarding rooms postmortem, what did you do, what worked, lessons learned

@Nikhil, we (the organizers of Upstream Institute) sent a few emails [1][2] out to the dev mailing list asking for help and representatives from various projects to attend and get involved. We are also working on building a network of project liaisons to direct newcomers to in each project. Would

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] A proposal for hackathon to reduce deploy time of TripleO

On 2017-05-24 16:27:18 -0500 (-0500), Ben Nemec wrote: [...] > I spent a _lot_ of time tracking down performance issues and > optimizing things where I could, and in the end pretty much every > gain I made was regressed somewhere else within a few weeks, > leaving us where we are now with jobs

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] using keystone right - catalog, endpoints, tokens and noauth

On 05/24/2017 12:51 PM, Eric Fried wrote: Pavlo- There's a blueprint [1] whereby we're trying to address a bunch of these same concerns in nova. You can see the first part in action here [2]. However, it has become clear that nova is just one of the many services that would benefit

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] A proposal for hackathon to reduce deploy time of TripleO

On 05/23/2017 05:47 AM, Sagi Shnaidman wrote: Hi, all I'd like to propose an idea to make one or two days hackathon in TripleO project with main goal - to reduce deployment time of TripleO. - How could it be arranged? We can arrange a separate IRC channel and Bluejeans video conference

Re: [openstack-dev] Documenting config drive - what do you want to see?

On 05/24/2017 10:07 AM, Clark Boylan wrote: On Wed, May 24, 2017, at 07:39 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote: Rocky tipped me off to a request to document config drive which came up at the Boston Forum, and I tracked that down to Clark's wishlist etherpad [1] (L195) which states: "Document the config

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] Stepping Down

Dharini, Thanks for your good work. It's been good working with you on Glance. All the best! Cheers On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 8:46 PM, Chandrasekar, Dharini < dharini.chandrase...@intel.com> wrote: > Hello Glancers, > > > > Due to a change in my job role with my employer, I unfortunately do not

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] Stepping Down

Hemanth, sorry to see you step down here. Thanks for your astute input all along. All the best! Cheers On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 5:49 PM, Hemanth Makkapati wrote: > Glancers, > Due to a significant change to my job description, I wouldn't be able to > contribute to Glance

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance][openstack-ansible] Moving on

Sorry to see you go, Steve. Your code, feedback and all the work has always been super helpful so thank you very much. You shall be an asset to any team you work on. All the best! On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 11:55 PM, Steve Lewis wrote: > It is clear to me now that I won't be

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Onboarding rooms postmortem, what did you do, what worked, lessons learned

Project: Glance Attendees: ~15 What was done: We started by introducing the core team (or whatever existed then), did a run down of Glance API documentation especially for developers, other references like notes for ops, best practices. We went through the architecture of the project. A few

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] please approve test patch to fix glanceclient

thanks (for your work and to Flavio for the other +2). this is done as well. On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 1:07 PM, Eric Fried wrote: > Thanks Nikhil. This one is also needed to make py35 pass: > > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/396816/ > > E > > On 05/24/2017 10:55 AM, Nikhil

Re: [openstack-dev] [ptg] Strawman Queens PTG week slicing

On 05/24/2017 02:21 PM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: On 2017-05-24 13:25:21 -0500 (-0500), Sean McGinnis wrote: [...] Well, it could be more encouraging this time if the tables aren't connected together making it difficult to easily rearrange them. :] A very good point I've now passed along to them,

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][vlan trunking] Guest networking configuration for vlan trunk

Thanks for the pointer. I think your suggestion in comments #14 https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1631371/comments/14 makes sense. I actually meant to address the nova side so that trunk details can be exposed in the metadata and configdrive. -Robert On 5/24/17, 1:52 PM, "Armando M."

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone][nova][cinder][glance][neutron][horizon][policy] defining admin-ness

I'd like to fill in a little more context here. I see three options with the current two proposals. *Option 1* Use a special admin project to denote elevated privileges. For those unfamiliar with the approach, it would rely on every deployment having an "admin" project defined in configuration

Re: [openstack-dev] [release] Issues with reno

Excerpts from Doug Hellmann's message of 2017-05-23 12:10:56 -0400: > Excerpts from Matt Riedemann's message of 2017-05-22 21:48:37 -0500: > > I think Doug and I have talked about this before, but it came up again > > tonight. > > > > There seems to be an issue where release notes for the

Re: [openstack-dev] [ptg] Strawman Queens PTG week slicing

On 2017-05-24 13:25:21 -0500 (-0500), Sean McGinnis wrote: [...] > Well, it could be more encouraging this time if the tables aren't > connected together making it difficult to easily rearrange them. :] A very good point I've now passed along to them, along with a suggestion to make up a bunch of

Re: [openstack-dev] [ptg] Strawman Queens PTG week slicing

We did end up moving tables closer together from their original huge square layout In the Ironic room we also had to move tables a bit closer. They were really far apart, and not all contributors where comfortable with raising their voice. [...] The organizers tried really hard to convey that

Re: [openstack-dev] [ovs-discuss] OpenStack and OVN integration is failing on multi-node physical machines.(probably a bug)

On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 6:48 PM, pranab boruah wrote: > Hi, > We are building a multi-node physical set-up of OpenStack Newton. The > goal is to finally integrate the set-up with OVN. > Lab details: > 1 Controller, 2 computes > > CentOS-7.3, OpenStack Newton,

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][vlan trunking] Guest networking configuration for vlan trunk

On 24 May 2017 at 08:53, Robert Li (baoli) wrote: > Hi Kevin, > > > > In that case, I will start working on it. Should this be considered a RFE > or a regular bug? > There have been discussions in the past about this [1]. The conclusion of the discussion was: Nova should have

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] using keystone right - catalog, endpoints, tokens and noauth

Pavlo- There's a blueprint [1] whereby we're trying to address a bunch of these same concerns in nova. You can see the first part in action here [2]. However, it has become clear that nova is just one of the many services that would benefit from get_service_url(). With the full support

Re: [openstack-dev] Security bug in diskimage-builder

On 05/17/2017 10:46 AM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: On 2017-05-17 15:57:16 +0300 (+0300), George Shuklin wrote: There is a bug in diskimage-builder I reported it at 2017-03-10 as 'private security'. I think this bug is a medium severity. So far there was no reaction at all. I plan to change this

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Onboarding rooms postmortem, what did you do, what worked, lessons learned

Project: Cinder Attendees: Approximately 30 I was really pleased by the number of people that attended the Cinder session and the fact that they people in the room seemed engaged with the presentation and asked good questions showing interest in the project. I think having the on-boardings

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] please approve test patch to fix glanceclient

Thanks Nikhil. This one is also needed to make py35 pass: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/396816/ E On 05/24/2017 10:55 AM, Nikhil Komawar wrote: > thanks for bringing it up. this is done. > > On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 10:54 AM, Sean Dague > wrote: > >

[openstack-dev] [infra] lists.openstack.org maintenance Friday, May 26 20:00-21:00 UTC

The Mailman listserv on lists.openstack.org will be offline for an archive-related maintenance for up to an hour starting at 20:00 UTC May 26, this coming Friday. This activity is scheduled for a relatively low-volume period across our lists; during this time, most messages bound for the server

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] revised structure of the heat-templates repository. Suggestions

On 19/05/17 11:00, Lance Haig wrote: Hi, As we know the heat-templates repository has become out of date in some respects and also has been difficult to be maintained from a community perspective. For me the repository is quiet confusing with different styles that are used to show certain

Re: [openstack-dev] [ptg] Strawman Queens PTG week slicing

On 2017-05-24 18:11:12 +0200 (+0200), Dmitry Tantsur wrote: > On 05/24/2017 05:57 PM, Sean McGinnis wrote: [...] > > It was mostly just due to the layout of the tables [...] > > We did end up moving tables closer together from their original > > huge square layout > > In the Ironic room we also

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] [Cells] Stupid question: Cells v2 & AZs

Thanks all. On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 8:08 AM, Dan Smith wrote: > > Thanks for answering the base question. So, if AZs are implemented with > > haggs, then really, they are truly disjoint from cells (ie, not a subset > > of a cell and not a superset of a cell, just unrelated.)

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] revised structure of the heat-templates repository. Suggestions

On 22/05/17 12:49, Lance Haig wrote: I also asked the other day if there is a list of heat version matched to Openstack version and I was told that there is not. You mean like https://docs.openstack.org/developer/heat/template_guide/hot_spec.html#ocata ?

Re: [openstack-dev] [ptg] Strawman Queens PTG week slicing

On 05/24/2017 05:57 PM, Sean McGinnis wrote: On 05/24/2017 10:13 AM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: On 2017-05-24 08:28:56 -0500 (-0500), Sean McGinnis wrote: [...] In ATL the Cinder room was very large, to the point that it was actually a little difficult hearing some people for some of the

Re: [openstack-dev] Documenting config drive - what do you want to see?

Matt Riedemann wrote: Rocky tipped me off to a request to document config drive which came up at the Boston Forum, and I tracked that down to Clark's wishlist etherpad [1] (L195) which states: "Document the config drive. The only way I have been able to figure out how to make a config drive is

Re: [openstack-dev] [ptg] Strawman Queens PTG week slicing

On 05/24/2017 10:13 AM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: On 2017-05-24 08:28:56 -0500 (-0500), Sean McGinnis wrote: [...] In ATL the Cinder room was very large, to the point that it was actually a little difficult hearing some people for some of the discussions. [...] Was the room actually full, or were

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] please approve test patch to fix glanceclient

thanks for bringing it up. this is done. On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 10:54 AM, Sean Dague wrote: > python-glanceclient patches have been failing for at least a week due to > a requests change. The fix was posted 5 days ago - > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/466385 > > It would be

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][vlan trunking] Guest networking configuration for vlan trunk

Hi Kevin, In that case, I will start working on it. Should this be considered a RFE or a regular bug? Thanks, Robert On 5/23/17, 12:12 AM, "Kevin Benton" > wrote: I think we just need someone to volunteer to do the work to expose it as metadata to

Re: [openstack-dev] [networking-bagpipe] exabgp dependency

Hi Thomas On Tue, 23 May 2017 at 09:14 wrote: > Hi James, > > FYI, exabgp 4.0.0 has been released and this release can be package to > satisfy networking-bagpipe needs. > A request for adding exabgp as a proper OpenStack requirement is in > flight:

Re: [openstack-dev] [ptg] Strawman Queens PTG week slicing

On 5/24/17, 4:34 PM, "Doug Hellmann" wrote: Excerpts from Thierry Carrez's message of 2017-05-24 16:44:44 +0200: > Doug Hellmann wrote: > > Two questions about theme-based initiatives: > > > > I would like to have a discussion about the work to stop

[openstack-dev] [keystone][nova][cinder][glance][neutron][horizon][policy] defining admin-ness

Hey all, To date we have two proposed solutions for tackling the admin-ness issue we have across the services. One builds on the existing scope concepts by scoping to an admin project [0]. The other introduces global role assignments [1] as a way to denote elevated privileges. I'd like to get

Re: [openstack-dev] [ptg] Strawman Queens PTG week slicing

Excerpts from Thierry Carrez's message of 2017-05-24 16:44:44 +0200: > Doug Hellmann wrote: > > Two questions about theme-based initiatives: > > > > I would like to have a discussion about the work to stop syncing > > requirements and to see if we can make progress on the implementation > > while

Re: [openstack-dev] [ptg] Strawman Queens PTG week slicing

On 2017-05-24 08:28:56 -0500 (-0500), Sean McGinnis wrote: [...] > In ATL the Cinder room was very large, to the point that it was > actually a little difficult hearing some people for some of the > discussions. [...] Was the room actually full, or were people just failing to properly huddle up

Re: [openstack-dev] [ptg] Strawman Queens PTG week slicing

On 2017-05-24 11:58:15 + (+), Andrea Frittoli wrote: [...] > The only concern I have here is that the topics to be discussed by > the QA and Infra teams will be different and a shared room might > not be ideal since we would have two ongoing discussions in the > same room. The three days

Re: [openstack-dev] Documenting config drive - what do you want to see?

On Wed, May 24, 2017, at 07:39 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote: > Rocky tipped me off to a request to document config drive which came up > at the Boston Forum, and I tracked that down to Clark's wishlist > etherpad [1] (L195) which states: > > "Document the config drive. The only way I have been

Re: [openstack-dev] [ptg] Strawman Queens PTG week slicing

On 2017-05-24 12:10:17 +0200 (+0200), Thierry Carrez wrote: [...] > One of the things you might notice on Mon-Tue is the "helproom" concept. > In the spirit of separating inter-project and intra-project activities, > support teams (Infra, QA, Release Management, Stable branch maintenance, > but

Re: [openstack-dev] Documenting config drive - what do you want to see?

On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 10:39 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote: > > Rocky tipped me off to a request to document config drive which came up at the Boston Forum, and I tracked that down to Clark's wishlist etherpad [1] (L195) which states: > > "Document the config drive. The only way

Re: [openstack-dev] Save the Date- Queens PTG

W dniu 24.05.2017 o 16:47, Anita Kuno pisze: > $ means dollar, it doesn't mean USD as a default and Canadian only if we > feel like it. Dollars, dollars, dollars, dollars... I hope for some price quotes and details soon. Have to provide budget request to be able to attend at all ;D

Re: [openstack-dev] [Massively distributed] Optimizing the interaction of OpenStack components

On 5/11/2017 1:44 PM, Georg Kunz wrote: Nevertheless, one concrete thing which came to my mind, is this proposed improvement of the interaction between Nova and Neutron: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/390513/ In a nutshell, the idea is that Neutron adds more information to a port object so

Re: [openstack-dev] [ptg] Strawman Queens PTG week slicing

Thierry, Thank you for getting this Strawman out. I think it is helpful! I think the plan looks good. Jay On 5/24/2017 5:10 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: Hi everyone, In a previous thread[1] I introduced the idea of moving the PTG from a purely horizontal/vertical week split to a more

[openstack-dev] [glance] please approve test patch to fix glanceclient

python-glanceclient patches have been failing for at least a week due to a requests change. The fix was posted 5 days ago - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/466385 It would be nice to get that approved so that other patches could be considered. -Sean -- Sean Dague http://dague.net

Re: [openstack-dev] [release][tc][infra][security][stable] Proposal for shipping binaries and containers

On 2017-05-24 14:22:14 +0200 (+0200), Thierry Carrez wrote: [...] > we ship JARs already: > http://tarballs.openstack.org/ci/monasca-common/ [...] Worth pointing out, those all have "SNAPSHOT" in their filenames which by Apache Maven convention indicates they're not official releases. Also

Re: [openstack-dev] Save the Date- Queens PTG

I believe he means normalized in the programming sense. Like for the sake of comparison. Jimmy Anita Kuno May 24, 2017 at 9:47 AM I take offense to the idea that USD is considered normal, especially when referencing hotel rates in a Canadian city. $ means

Re: [openstack-dev] [Massively distributed] Optimizing the interaction of OpenStack components

On 5/24/2017 6:48 AM, Ronan-Alexandre Cherrueau wrote: You can find examples of such diagrams that have been automatically generated on the website where we host results of our experiments[5]. This is nice, I've seen others do things like this before with Rally and osprofiler. The super thin

Re: [openstack-dev] Save the Date- Queens PTG

On 2017-05-24 04:16 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: Monty Taylor wrote: On 05/23/2017 06:27 PM, Anita Kuno wrote: My mistake I mis-read, $149 USD is equal to $201 CDN (Canadian currency), so it looks like the same price to me. I believe (although I do not know for absolute certain) that the prices

Re: [openstack-dev] [ptg] Strawman Queens PTG week slicing

Sean McGinnis wrote: > I see Cinder is down for an XL room. Any idea of the size of the rooms > this time around? If they are going to be as spacious as ATL, I think a > L room might actually work better for us than XL. Of course I say this > not really knowing how many attendees we will end up

Re: [openstack-dev] [murano] Meeting time

Hi Felipe, From our end I think one hour earlier would be great. > I can create a patch in infra and add you and others to it to > allow for people to effectively vote for what times you prefer. Sure thing that sounds good! -Paul On 24/05/17 03:56, Felipe Monteiro wrote: Hi Paul, I'm open

Re: [openstack-dev] [ptg] Strawman Queens PTG week slicing

Doug Hellmann wrote: > Two questions about theme-based initiatives: > > I would like to have a discussion about the work to stop syncing > requirements and to see if we can make progress on the implementation > while we have the right people together. That seems like a topic > for Monday or

[openstack-dev] Documenting config drive - what do you want to see?

Rocky tipped me off to a request to document config drive which came up at the Boston Forum, and I tracked that down to Clark's wishlist etherpad [1] (L195) which states: "Document the config drive. The only way I have been able to figure out how to make a config drive is by either reading

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][all] Etcd as a base service for ALL OpenStack installations

W dniu 24.05.2017 o 15:34, David Medberry pisze: > There are older versions of etcd (3.1.0) in both Debian and Ubuntu. Is > that new enough or do we need 3.1.7? etcd 3.1.4 is in Debian/sid while we use Debian/stretch in Kolla. Ubuntu/xenial has version 2.2.5 which may be too old. And if you want

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] [Cells] Stupid question: Cells v2 & AZs

> Thanks for answering the base question. So, if AZs are implemented with > haggs, then really, they are truly disjoint from cells (ie, not a subset > of a cell and not a superset of a cell, just unrelated.) Does that > philosophy agree with what you are stating? Correct, aggregates are at the

[openstack-dev] [neutron][l3][dvr] Pike tasks and meeting consolidation

At the Summit a few of us met (Miguel, Swami and myself) to talk about our Pike tasks now that we have lost some resources. We came up with this short list, which can also be found on https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/neutron-l3-subteam : 1. Support for configuring Floating IPs on Centralized

[openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] mount ceph block from an instance

Hi osa team, i have a multimode openstack-ansible deployed, ocata 15.1.3, with ceph as backend for cinder (with our own ceph infra). After create an instance with root volume, i would like to mount a ceph block or cephfs directly to the vm (not a cinder volume). So i want to attach a new

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][all] Etcd as a base service for ALL OpenStack installations

David, As long as the etcd has this support, we are good https://github.com/coreos/etcd/issues/5525 https://github.com/coreos/etcd/pull/5669 Thanks, Dims On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 9:34 AM, David Medberry wrote: > > On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 6:14 AM, Davanum Srinivas

Re: [openstack-dev] [ptg] Strawman Queens PTG week slicing

Excerpts from Thierry Carrez's message of 2017-05-24 12:10:17 +0200: > Hi everyone, > > In a previous thread[1] I introduced the idea of moving the PTG from a > purely horizontal/vertical week split to a more > inter-project/intra-project activities split, and the initial comments > were

Re: [openstack-dev] [Massively distributed] Optimizing the interaction of OpenStack components

Georg, > I unfortunately missed to join yesterday's working group meeting. Just > to confirm, the IRC meetings are every two weeks on Wednesday at 15 UTC. > Is that still correct? IRC meetings of Performance WG chaired by Dina Belova are every Tuesday, 15:30 UTC in `#openstack-performance'. IRC

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] [Cells] Stupid question: Cells v2 & AZs

Thanks Belmiro. So, when using Host Aggregates (haggs) as pure haggs, and not as AZs, is their any conflict/interaction if we then enable AZs? This is more of a philosophical question. Thanks for answering the base question. So, if AZs are implemented with haggs, then really, they are truly

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][all] Etcd as a base service for ALL OpenStack installations

On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 6:14 AM, Davanum Srinivas wrote: > http://tarballs.openstack.org/etcd/ There are older versions of etcd (3.1.0) in both Debian and Ubuntu. Is that new enough or do we need 3.1.7? As an operator, I'd much prefer to see a packaged version of this

Re: [openstack-dev] [ptg] Strawman Queens PTG week slicing

On 05/24/2017 05:10 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: Hi everyone, In a previous thread[1] I introduced the idea of moving the PTG from a purely horizontal/vertical week split to a more inter-project/intra-project activities split, and the initial comments were positive. We need to solidify how the

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Undercloud backup and restore

On 24.5.2017 15:02, Marios Andreou wrote: On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 10:26 AM, Carlos Camacho Gonzalez < ccama...@redhat.com> wrote: Hey folks, Based on what we discussed yesterday in the TripleO weekly team meeting, I'll like to propose a blueprint to create 2 features, basically to backup and

[openstack-dev] [os-upstream-institute] Alternating meeting time poll

Hi, As we are over the Boston training now we can revise a bit how our team operates and make improvements. One area is certainly the meetings as we only have one dedicated meeting slot, but team members all around the globe, so we decided to try to continue with alternating slots. If you

Re: [openstack-dev] [trove] Trove meeting time update

This did merge! Simple reminder to everyone we will be meeting today at Wednesday 1500 UTC in #openstack-meeting-alt for our regular team weekly meeting. -Original Message- From: Amrith Kumar [mailto:amrith.ku...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, May 19, 2017 7:13 PM To: 'OpenStack Development

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Undercloud backup and restore

On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 10:26 AM, Carlos Camacho Gonzalez < ccama...@redhat.com> wrote: > Hey folks, > > Based on what we discussed yesterday in the TripleO weekly team meeting, > I'll like to propose a blueprint to create 2 features, basically to backup > and restore the Undercloud. > > I'll

Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack] etcd3 enabled breaks s390x arch

Thanks for the help Mikhail, So just FYI for others, the etcd 3.2.0 is in RC1, We will get a full set of arch(es) covered once that goes GA Thanks, Dims On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 8:45 AM, Mikhail S Medvedev wrote: > > On 05/24/2017 06:59 AM, Sean Dague wrote: >> >> On

Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack] etcd3 enabled breaks s390x arch

In the meanwhile I found some more information like [1]. I understood that devstack downloads the binaries from github as distros don't have the latest version available. But the binaries for s390x are not yet provided there. I opened a issue to figure out what would need to be done to get the

[openstack-dev] [Stackalytics] How to deploy a "stackalytics"

Hi folks, I got stuck after I installed stackalytics. The stackalytics-dashboard doesn't work. The main process followed the guide[1]. I want to know if there is some other ways to deploy a "stackalytics" in my environment. Stackalytics wiki[2] is the only guide I can find. I'm very appreciate it

Re: [openstack-dev] [ptg] Strawman Queens PTG week slicing

On 05/24/2017 02:30 PM, Thierry Carrez wrote: Dmitry Tantsur wrote: On 05/24/2017 12:10 PM, Thierry Carrez wrote: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1xmOdT6uZ5XqViActr5sBOaz_mEgjKSCY7NEWcAEcT-A/pubhtml?gid=397241312=true Let me know what you think. If you're scheduled on the Wed-Fri but

Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack] etcd3 enabled breaks s390x arch

On 05/24/2017 06:59 AM, Sean Dague wrote: On 05/24/2017 07:48 AM, Andreas Scheuring wrote: > Hi together, > > recently etcd3 was enabled as service in devstack [1]. This breaks > devstack on s390x Linux, as there are no s390x binaries availabe and > there's no way to disable the etcd3 service.

Re: [openstack-dev] [ptg] Strawman Queens PTG week slicing

Dmitry Tantsur wrote: > On 05/24/2017 12:10 PM, Thierry Carrez wrote: >> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1xmOdT6uZ5XqViActr5sBOaz_mEgjKSCY7NEWcAEcT-A/pubhtml?gid=397241312=true >> >> Let me know what you think. If you're scheduled on the Wed-Fri but would >> rather be scheduled on Mon-Tue

Re: [openstack-dev] [release][tc][infra][security][stable] Proposal for shipping binaries and containers

Doug Hellmann wrote: > Excerpts from Davanum Srinivas (dims)'s message of 2017-05-23 10:44:30 -0400: >> For projects based on Go and Containers we need to ship binaries, for > > Can you elaborate on the use of the term "need" here. Is that because > otherwise the projects can't be consumed? Is it

Re: [openstack-dev] [Massively distributed] Optimizing the interaction of OpenStack components

Hi Ronan, > First of all, sorry for the late response. I took a one-week vacation after > the > Summit to visit the US. No problem at all. I hope you had a great time. > > Nevertheless, one concrete thing which came to my mind, is this > > proposed improvement of the interaction between Nova

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][all] Etcd as a base service for ALL OpenStack installations

Marcin, Yes, we need ubuntu/debian packagers to please package etcd3. Right now, devstack uses either github [1] or the tarballs [2] to pick up etcd3 and installs it. Thanks, Dims [1] https://github.com/openstack-dev/devstack/blob/master/lib/etcd3#L27 [2] http://tarballs.openstack.org/etcd/

[openstack-dev] [acceleration]Cyborg Weekly Team Meeting 2017.05.24

Hi Team, A kind reminder for our weekly meeting today, agenda at https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/CyborgTeamMeeting#Agenda_for_next_meeting and meeting is at #openstack-cyborg around UTC 15:00 -- Zhipeng (Howard) Huang Standard Engineer IT Standard & Patent/IT Product Line Huawei

Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack] etcd3 enabled breaks s390x arch

On 05/24/2017 07:48 AM, Andreas Scheuring wrote: > Hi together, > > recently etcd3 was enabled as service in devstack [1]. This breaks > devstack on s390x Linux, as there are no s390x binaries availabe and > there's no way to disable the etcd3 service. > > I pushed a patch to allow disabling

Re: [openstack-dev] [ptg] Strawman Queens PTG week slicing

On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 11:40 AM Dmitry Tantsur wrote: > On 05/24/2017 12:10 PM, Thierry Carrez wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > > > In a previous thread[1] I introduced the idea of moving the PTG from a > > purely horizontal/vertical week split to a more > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [Massively distributed] Optimizing the interaction of OpenStack components

Hi Georg, First of all, sorry for the late response. I took a one-week vacation after the Summit to visit the US. > Hi Ronan, hi Adrien, > > we talked yesterday in the edge/massively distributed working group > meeting about optimizations of the control traffic between OpenStack > components.

[openstack-dev] [devstack] etcd3 enabled breaks s390x arch

Hi together, recently etcd3 was enabled as service in devstack [1]. This breaks devstack on s390x Linux, as there are no s390x binaries availabe and there's no way to disable the etcd3 service. I pushed a patch to allow disabling the etcd3 service in local.conf [2]. It would be great if we

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][all] Etcd as a base service for ALL OpenStack installations

W dniu 24.05.2017 o 12:11, Davanum Srinivas pisze: > Here's the proposal: > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/467436/ There is no etcd package in Debian/stretch. __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)

Re: [openstack-dev] [ptg] Strawman Queens PTG week slicing

On 05/24/2017 12:10 PM, Thierry Carrez wrote: Hi everyone, In a previous thread[1] I introduced the idea of moving the PTG from a purely horizontal/vertical week split to a more inter-project/intra-project activities split, and the initial comments were positive. We need to solidify how the

[openstack-dev] [tc][all] Etcd as a base service for ALL OpenStack installations

Team, Here's the proposal: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/467436/ Thanks, Dims PS: Please look through older discussions for more context: https://www.mail-archive.com/search?a=1=openstack-dev%40lists.openstack.org=etcd3=newest

[openstack-dev] [ptg] Strawman Queens PTG week slicing

Hi everyone, In a previous thread[1] I introduced the idea of moving the PTG from a purely horizontal/vertical week split to a more inter-project/intra-project activities split, and the initial comments were positive. We need to solidify how the week will look like before we open up registration

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] why is glance image service code so complex?

Hi, regarding #1: there are actually 4 methods there that are not used anywhere in ironic, which are to list images and create/update/delete an image in Glance. The question is do we consider those classes to be a part of public ironic Python API? Are we safe to remove them right away? Or should

[openstack-dev] [all] Global Request ID progress

The Global Request ID effort made some good progress this week https://review.openstack.org/#/c/464746/ (and was merged last night). The new TL;DR - we're going to pass around a value that is strongly validated to req-$uuid. It's stored in a different field in oslo.context (global_request_id). If

[openstack-dev] [ironic] using keystone right - catalog, endpoints, tokens and noauth

Hi all, There are several problems or inefficiencies in how we are dealing with auth to other services. Although it became much better in Newton, some things are still to be improved and I like to discuss how to tackle those and my ideas for that. Keystone endpoints === Apparently

Re: [openstack-dev] Save the Date- Queens PTG

Monty Taylor wrote: > On 05/23/2017 06:27 PM, Anita Kuno wrote: >> My mistake I mis-read, $149 USD is equal to $201 CDN (Canadian >> currency), so it looks like the same price to me. > > I believe (although I do not know for absolute certain) that the prices > given were already normalized to

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Undercloud backup and restore

Hi Carlos A common request that i hear, is that customers need a way to rollback or downgrade a system after an upgrade. So that will be useful of course. What about the overcloud, are you considering that possibility? If they find that an upgrade on a controller node breaks something for example.

[openstack-dev] [oslo] cancel weekly meeting in next week (05/29)

Hi folks, Just a reminder that we will skip oslo weekly meeting in next week, due to the holiday of the USA. Coincidently, It's also a holiday for Chinese. -- ChangBo Guo(gcb) __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for

[openstack-dev] [TripleO] Undercloud backup and restore

Hey folks, Based on what we discussed yesterday in the TripleO weekly team meeting, I'll like to propose a blueprint to create 2 features, basically to backup and restore the Undercloud. I'll like to follow in the first iteration the available docs for this purpose [1][2]. With the addition of

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] A proposal for hackathon to reduce deploy time of TripleO

On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 4:40 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote: > On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 6:47 AM, Sagi Shnaidman > wrote: > > Hi, all > > > > I'd like to propose an idea to make one or two days hackathon in TripleO > > project with main goal - to reduce

Re: [openstack-dev] [gnocchi] Running tests

On Tue, May 23 2017, aalvarez wrote: > Ok so started the tests using: > > tox -e py27-postgresql-file > > The suite starts running fine, but then I get a failing test: Can you reproduce it each time? That's weird, I don't think we ever saw that. -- Julien Danjou ;; Free Software hacker ;;

  1   2   >