Re: [openstack-dev] [all][stackalytics] Gaming the Stackalytics stats

On 04/08/2016 04:39 PM, John Dickinson wrote: > > > On 8 Apr 2016, at 13:35, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > >> On 2016-04-08 19:42:18 +0200 (+0200), Dmitry Tantsur wrote: >>> There are many ways to game a simple +1 counter, such as +1'ing changes >>> that already have at least 1x +2, or which already

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Newton midcycle planning

On 04/11/2016 04:49 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: > A few people have been asking about planning for the nova midcycle for > newton. Looking at the schedule [1] I'm thinking weeks R-15 or R-11 work > the best. R-14 is close to the US July 4th holiday, R-13 is during the > week of the US July 4th

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable] Proposing Tony Breeds for stable-maint-core

On 03/18/2016 04:11 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: > I'd like to propose tonyb for stable-maint-core. Tony is pretty much my > day to day guy on stable, he's generally in every stable team meeting > (which is not attended well so I appreciate it), and he's as proactive > as ever on staying on top of

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] purplerbot irc bot for logs and transclusion

On 03/16/2016 10:45 AM, Paul Belanger wrote: > I would like to see it added to openstack-infra so we can properly > manage it. I agree with Paul here. To that end I have added an item on next week's infra meeting agenda about IRC Bots with the aim of discussing this, as this is not the only bot

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] CI jobs take pretty long, can we improve that?

On 03/21/2016 09:48 PM, Clark Boylan wrote: > On Mon, Mar 21, 2016, at 06:37 PM, Assaf Muller wrote: >> On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 9:26 PM, Clark Boylan >> wrote: >>> On Mon, Mar 21, 2016, at 06:15 PM, Assaf Muller wrote: On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 8:09 PM, Clark Boylan

[openstack-dev] Bots and Their Effects: Gerrit, IRC, other

Bots are very handy for doing repetitive tasks, we agree on that. Bots also require permissions to execute certain actions, require maintenance to ensure they operate as expected and do create output which is music to some and noise to others. Said output is often archieved somewhere which

Re: [openstack-dev] Newton summit planning etherpad

On 03/22/2016 05:42 PM, Steve Martinelli wrote: > > The summit planning etherpad for Keystone is here: > https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/keystone-newton-summit-brainstorm > > Please brainstorm / toss ideas up / discuss Newton cycle goals > > Thanks, > > Steve Martinelli > OpenStack Keystone

Re: [openstack-dev] Somebody posted this on #openstack-meetng-4

On 03/21/2016 11:59 AM, Sukhdev Kapur wrote: > I just noticed that somebody posted this on the above meeting channel. Yes, that took place over the weekend and pleia2 removed that user. Should you see spam occur in irc channels please notify someone in #openstack-infra so they can address the

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][election][ec2-api][winstackers][stable] status of teams without PTL candidates

On 03/21/2016 12:33 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: > >> On Mar 21, 2016, at 12:03 PM, Alexandre Levine >> wrote: >> >> Doug, >> >> Let me clarify a bit the situation. >> Before this February there wasn't such a project at all. EC2 API was a >> built-in part of nova so no

Re: [openstack-dev] Visa Invitation Letter doesn't contain attachment

On 03/20/2016 10:46 PM, Zhi Chang wrote: > hi, guys. > > I received Visa Invitation Letter a few days ago. But the letter doesn't > contain attachment. What should I do? > > > > > Thanks > Zhi Chang > > > > __ >

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][election][ec2-api][winstackers][stable] status of teams without PTL candidates

On 03/21/2016 01:06 PM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > On 2016-03-21 06:14:25 -0400 (-0400), Sean Dague wrote: > [...] >> I'm +1 on Tony for Stable Maint. Though I also think that we >> should rollback any misgivings about election officials running >> for PTL slots. Of our 40 races only 7 (?) were

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][infra] revert new gerrit

On 03/18/2016 01:16 PM, Boris Pavlovic wrote: > Hi everybody, > > What about if we just create new project for alternative Gerrit WebUI and > use it? > I don't think that with current set of web frameworks it would be too hard. > > Best regards, > Boris Pavlovic It's called vinz:

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] A proposal to separate the design summit

On 03/01/2016 05:08 AM, Eoghan Glynn wrote: > >>> Current thinking would be to give preferential rates to access the main >>> summit to people who are present to other events (like this new >>> separated contributors-oriented event, or Ops midcycle(s)). That would >>> allow for a

[openstack-dev] Searching with the Summit Schdule App

My preference when consuming the schedule for the Design Summit is to see an entire project track in one view. I was unable to figure out how to accomplish this by clicking things on https://www.openstack.org/summit/austin-2016/summit-schedule/#day=2016-04-27_types=2 (the link ttx had provided for

[openstack-dev] Acknowledging Jim Blair's work on the TC

Jim is an incumbent on the TC this election and he didn't run. I'm posting this to express my thanks to Jim for his work and dedication on the TC. Jim, I think your commitment to open source, spanning many years before OpenStack, and your dedication to governance process, are qualities I admire

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Is the Intel SRIOV CI running and if so, what does it test?

On 03/31/2016 08:31 AM, Znoinski, Waldemar wrote: > > > >-Original Message- > >From: Matt Riedemann [mailto:mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com] > >Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2016 4:22 PM > >To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) >

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Is the Intel SRIOV CI running and if so, what does it test?

On 03/31/2016 10:34 AM, Anita Kuno wrote: > On 03/31/2016 08:31 AM, Znoinski, Waldemar wrote: >> >> >> >-Original Message- >> >From: Matt Riedemann [mailto:mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com] >> >Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2016 4:22 PM >> >To

[openstack-dev] PTL communication of offline time

I proposed a resolution to the TC regarding PTL leave of absences, outlining a workflow of communication: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/290141/ The proposal was struck down in favour of a change to the Project Team Guide: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/293170/ I recently was contacted by a

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] -2'ing all patches on every gate breakage

On 04/04/2016 12:01 PM, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: > Hi all, > > I noticed that often times we go and -2 all the patches in the review > queue on every neutron specific gate breakage spotted. This is allegedly > done to make sure that nothing known to be broken land in merge gate > until we fix the

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][infra] The same SRIOV / NFV CI failures missed a regression, why?

On 03/29/2016 08:56 AM, Znoinski, Waldemar wrote: > Hi Jay, Matt, Levi et al, > > The Intel NFV CI problems were fixed last week. > Also, I think if the CIs would have voting right it would attract more > attention. > > I'd be happy to work with OpenStack Infra team on getting our NFV CI the >

[openstack-dev] Thank you to our Event Planners

I would like to take a moment to say thank you to all the folks in our community who take the time and trouble to plan events for all of us to enjoy. Events of all kinds help us to learn and grow by extending ourselves and learning about different ways of doing things. We get to interact with new

Re: [openstack-dev] Question about OpenStack Code of Conduct

On 04/21/2016 02:04 PM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > On 2016-04-21 17:54:56 + (+), Adrian Otto wrote: >> Below is an excerpt from: >> https://www.openstack.org/legal/community-code-of-conduct/ >> >> "When we disagree, we consult others. Disagreements, both social >> and technical, happen all

Re: [openstack-dev] summit tools

On 04/20/2016 06:53 PM, Tony Breeds wrote: > On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 04:13:38PM +, Neil Jerram wrote: >> A couple of questions about our Austin-related planning tools... >> >> - Can one's calendar at >> https://www.openstack.org/summit/austin-2016/summit-schedule/#day=2016-04-25 >> be

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] when are your mid-cycle meetups?

On 05/23/2016 05:36 PM, Nikhil Komawar wrote: > FYI, > > Glance one was cancelled (so can't put on the wiki), as we are > preferring the virtual one for more participation. > > http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2016-May/095591.html Did you add it to the wiki page for virtual

Re: [openstack-dev] [security] VMT addition

On 05/21/2016 11:16 AM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > It's my pleasure to announce that Morgan Fainberg > (0D1A 8C84 23CF 3C86 BF42 0F7B B9A8 3CEF A07C 6D8A) has formally > joined the ranks of the OpenStack Vulnerability Management Team. His > years of expertise handling security issues in Keystone, and

[openstack-dev] [third-party] Are you getting value from the 8:00 utc Tuesday meeting?

I've been chairing this meeting for about 3 releases now and in this last release it has mostly been myself and lennyb, who also attends the Monday 15:00 utc third-party meeting that I chair. Are you getting value from the Tuesday 8:00 utc third-party meeting? If yes, please make yourself known.

Re: [openstack-dev] Wiki

On 05/11/2016 05:07 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 12:59:41PM -0400, Anita Kuno wrote: >> On 05/10/2016 12:48 PM, Dan Smith wrote: >>>>> Hmm... that's unfortunate, as we were trying to get some of our less >>>>> ephemeral items ou

Re: [openstack-dev] Wiki

On 05/11/2016 02:06 PM, Paul Belanger wrote: > On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 05:51:41PM +, Jeremy Stanley wrote: >> On 2016-05-11 10:04:26 -0400 (-0400), Sean Dague wrote: >> [...] >>> Before deciding that it's unsurmountable, maybe giving delete >>> permissions to a larger set of contributors might

Re: [openstack-dev] [third-party] Are you getting value from the 8:00 utc Tuesday meeting?

On 05/11/2016 02:22 PM, Mike Perez wrote: > On 14:30 May 10, Anita Kuno wrote: >> I've been chairing this meeting for about 3 releases now and in this >> last release it has mostly been myself and lennyb, who also attends the >> Monday 15:00 utc third-party meeting that I

Re: [openstack-dev] [stackalytics]many projects missing in the "others" category

On 05/03/2016 09:11 AM, joehuang wrote: > Hello, > > Very sad to know that some projects are missing again in the "others" > category. When I want to cite some statistic data for Tricircle core reviewer > nomination, can't find the data for many "others" projects which usually are > listed

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] supporting Go

On 05/04/2016 08:25 PM, Tom Fifield wrote: > On 04/05/16 01:58, John Dickinson wrote: >> TC, >> >> In reference to >> http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2016-May/093680.html and >> Thierry's reply, I'm currently drafting a TC resolution to update >>

Re: [openstack-dev] Wiki

On 05/10/2016 12:48 PM, Dan Smith wrote: >>> Hmm... that's unfortunate, as we were trying to get some of our less >>> ephemeral items out of random etherpads and into the wiki (which has the >>> value of being google indexed). > > Yeah, I'm kinda surprised anyone would consider a wiki-less world.

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Could you tell me the best way to develop openstack in Windows?

On 05/02/2016 04:20 AM, 박준하 wrote: > Hi forks, > > > > I’m beginner about Openstack developments. I’ve been really interested in > to know about Openstack and wanted to modify and test it. > > > > But I’m using PyCharm in the Windows 7 but, It’s very hard to programming > and testing when

Re: [openstack-dev] Team blogs

On 05/09/2016 06:45 PM, Robert Collins wrote: > IIRC mediawiki provides RSS of changes... maybe just using the wiki > more would be a good start, and have zero infra costs? > > -Rob Well we are actually moving away from the wiki. Currently new accounts are closed due to spammers using new

Re: [openstack-dev] Team blogs

On 05/09/2016 07:33 PM, Robert Collins wrote: > On 10 May 2016 at 10:55, Anita Kuno <ante...@anteaya.info> wrote: >> On 05/09/2016 06:45 PM, Robert Collins wrote: >>> IIRC mediawiki provides RSS of changes... maybe just using the wiki >>> more would be a good

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Newton midcycle planning

On 04/14/2016 08:52 PM, Bhandaru, Malini K wrote: > Hello Michael! > > Quite recently David Lyle hosted the Horizon Mid cycle at Intel Portland > offices – they enjoyed getting out and dinning in the cafeteria. > Internet accounts were set up ahead of schedule but IRC still was an issue. > We

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla][nova][infra] Voting gates

On 07/14/2016 10:21 AM, Steven Dake (stdake) wrote: > Hey folks, > > At the midcycle, we had a session on gating. > > Out of that session came the decision to make the build gates voting Jobs, you have voting jobs, gates do not vote. We have an overload of technical terms as it is. Newcomers

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla][nova][infra] Voting gates

-steve Thank you Steve, Anita. > > On 7/14/16, 7:37 AM, "Anita Kuno" <ante...@anteaya.info> wrote: > >> On 07/14/2016 10:21 AM, Steven Dake (stdake) wrote: >>> Hey folks, >>> >>> At the midcycle, we had a session on gating. >>> >>

Re: [openstack-dev] [ptl][requirements] nomination period started

On 07/27/2016 05:44 PM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > On 2016-07-27 17:38:49 -0400 (-0400), Anita Kuno wrote: > [...] >> /me assumes Jeremy's follow up suggestion/offer is to help compose the >> rolls, for which Anita is grateful > > Good guess, and yes I'm happy to if

Re: [openstack-dev] [ptl][requirements] nomination period started

On 07/27/2016 05:08 PM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > On 2016-07-27 08:41:17 -0500 (-0500), Matthew Thode wrote: >> We've started a period of self nomination in preparation for the >> requirements project fully moving into project (as it's still under Doug >> Hellmann). >> >> We are gathering the self

[openstack-dev] [requirements][elections] Requirements PTL Results

We'd like to thank all those folks who came out to participate in this election on very brief notice. Thank you. The participation rate is impressive. Thank you to all candidates who put themselves forward, showing their enthusiasm for the role. It is plain to see this new team has a lot of

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][cinder][stable] tag:follows-standard-deprecation should be removed

On 16-08-11 09:36 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote: Excerpts from Erno Kuvaja's message of 2016-08-11 13:59:54 +0100: On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 1:32 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: Excerpts from Erno Kuvaja's message of 2016-08-11 12:26:59 +0100: Hi all, As follow up on the mailing

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][cinder] tag:follows-standard-deprecation should be removed

On 16-08-12 09:21 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: Sean Dague wrote: I 100% understand the cinder policy of kicking drivers out without CI. And I think there is a lot of value in ensuring what's in tree is tested. However, from a user perspective basically it means that if you deploy Newton cinder

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder][CI] Rule of recheck keywords has been updated

On 07/13/2016 05:36 PM, Sean McGinnis wrote: > Thanks for sending this out! > > It would be appreciated if all CI maintainers get this updated to follow > the recommendations soon. It would really help us have consistency > across systems. > > Sean Clarifying this is a Cinder decision, so all

Re: [openstack-dev] [ptl][requirements] nomination period started

On 16-07-27 09:41 AM, Matthew Thode wrote: We've started a period of self nomination in preparation for the requirements project fully moving into project (as it's still under Doug Hellmann). We are gathering the self nominations here before we vote next week.

[openstack-dev] [requirements][elections] requirements PTL election now open

The OpenStack Requirements PTL election is now open. The poll will close after 13:00 utc August 11, 2016. The electorate has been sent ballots to the gerrit Preferred Email. If you have patches returned when you issue this gerrit query, you are part of the Requirements electorate:

Re: [openstack-dev] Why do we need a Requirements Team and PTL

On 16-08-06 10:34 AM, Davanum Srinivas wrote: Folks, Question asked by Julien here: https://twitter.com/juldanjou/status/761897228596350976 Answer: There's a boat load of work that goes on in global requirements process. Here's the list of things that we dropped on the new team being formed:

Re: [openstack-dev] [ptl][requirements] nomination period started

a question of a personal nature, please don't hesitate to email both election officials: Doug Hellmann <d...@doughellmann.com> and Anita Kuno as soon as you can so we can ensure you have the answers you need. Thank you to Jeremy Stanley for his assistance and support as well as his

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] Jenkinsfile support (or repo/s for them?)

On 16-08-15 01:19 PM, Joshua Harlow wrote: Hi folks, I've been experimenting/investigating/playing around with the 'new' jenkins pipeline support (see https://jenkins.io/doc/pipeline/ for those who don't know what this is) and it got me thinking that there are probably X other

[openstack-dev] PyCon Canada Call for Proposals

I spoke at this conference last year and it is a nice small friendly little conf. It was in Toronto last year and will be again this year. It is being held in November, most of the audience is university students. CFP is open for two more weeks:

Re: [openstack-dev] Supporting our global community

On 2017-01-29 01:34 PM, Jonathan Bryce wrote: OpenStack is a global open source community. The OpenStack Foundation serves members in 180 countries focused on advancing the capabilities and accessibility of open infrastructure everywhere. We fundamentally believe diversity and collaboration

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Improving Vendor Driver Discoverability

On 2017-01-16 01:19 PM, Jonathan Bryce wrote: On Jan 16, 2017, at 11:58 AM, Jay S. Bryant wrote: On 01/13/2017 10:29 PM, Mike Perez wrote: The way validation works is completely up to the project team. In my research as shown in the Summit etherpad [5] there's

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Improving Vendor Driver Discoverability

On 2017-01-17 02:08 AM, Isaac Beckman wrote: I think that it would also be a good idea to have the option to let the CI maintainers add some useful information on the current status. It is very helpful to know that the CI system is under maintenance which is the reason why it hasn't been

Re: [openstack-dev] Election Season, PTL and TC September/October 2016

On 16-09-13 09:52 AM, Nate Johnston wrote: On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 07:48:06AM -0500, Sean McGinnis wrote: On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 05:14:56PM +1000, Tony Breeds wrote: On Fri, Sep 02, 2016 at 12:10:53PM +, Tristan Cacqueray wrote: Lastly, election officials are also reachable through the

Re: [openstack-dev] Election Season, PTL and TC September/October 2016

On 16-09-13 10:23 AM, Anita Kuno wrote: On 16-09-13 09:52 AM, Nate Johnston wrote: On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 07:48:06AM -0500, Sean McGinnis wrote: On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 05:14:56PM +1000, Tony Breeds wrote: On Fri, Sep 02, 2016 at 12:10:53PM +, Tristan Cacqueray wrote: Lastly, election

Re: [openstack-dev] [packaging][rpm] 3rd-party gates promotion to voting gates

On 16-09-29 08:12 AM, Haïkel wrote: 2016-09-26 16:05 GMT+02:00 Anita Kuno <ante...@anteaya.info>: On 16-09-26 07:48 AM, Haïkel wrote: Hi, following our discussions about 3rd party gates in RPM packaging project, I suggest that we vote in order to promote the following gates as voting:

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-announce] OpenStack Newton is officially released!

On 16-10-06 10:04 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote: Hello OpenStack community, I'm overjoyed to announce the final releases for the components of OpenStack Newton, which conclude the 6-month Newton development cycle. You will find a complete list of the deliverables for the 31 services and ~130 other

Re: [openstack-dev] [elections][tc]Thoughts on the TC election process

On 16-10-04 12:54 PM, Thierry Carrez wrote: Doug Hellmann wrote: John Davidge wrote: Thierry, I'm surprised by your open hostility towards candidates. Accusing people of 'pretending' to care about things that they've taken the time to This is an excellent example of needing to know the

Re: [openstack-dev] [security] [salt] Removal of Security and OpenStackSalt project teams from the Big Tent

On 16-09-21 01:11 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: Excerpts from Clint Byrum's message of 2016-09-21 08:56:24 -0700: Excerpts from Filip Pytloun's message of 2016-09-21 14:58:52 +0200: Hello, it's definately our bad that we missed elections in OpenStackSalt project. Reason is similar to Rob's - we

Re: [openstack-dev] [security] [salt] Removal of Security and OpenStackSalt project teams from the Big Tent

On 16-09-22 11:32 AM, Filip Pytloun wrote: If there's more we can do, we are available at Freenode/#openstack-salt. I think this right here is your issue. Believing it is the responsibility of the tc or other leaders to find you. It isn't. Be available on #openstack-dev at the very least.

Re: [openstack-dev] Too many mails on announce list again :)

On 16-09-20 05:38 PM, Morgan Fainberg wrote: On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 9:18 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote: Excerpts from Thierry Carrez's message of 2016-09-20 10:19:04 +0200: Steve Martinelli wrote: I think bundling the puppet, ansible and oslo releases together would cut

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] ops meetup feedback

On 16-09-20 09:20 AM, Sean Dague wrote: This is a bit delayed due to the release rush, finally getting back to writing up my experiences at the Ops Meetup. Nova Feedback Session = We had a double session for Feedback for Nova from Operators, raw etherpad here -

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Timeframe for future elections & "Release stewards"

On 16-09-07 12:43 PM, Davanum Srinivas wrote: On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 12:35 PM, Ian Cordasco wrote: -Original Message- From: Monty Taylor Reply: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Timeframe for future elections & "Release stewards"

On 16-09-07 02:19 PM, Ian Cordasco wrote: -Original Message- From: Anita Kuno <ante...@anteaya.info> Reply: Anita Kuno <ante...@anteaya.info> Date: September 7, 2016 at 13:08:44 To: Ian Cordasco <sigmaviru...@gmail.com>, OpenStack Development Mailing List (not f

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Timeframe for future elections & "Release stewards"

On 16-09-07 12:20 PM, Barrett, Carol L wrote: -Original Message- From: Sean Dague [mailto:s...@dague.net] Sent: Wednesday, September 07, 2016 9:05 AM To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Timeframe for future elections & "Release stewards" On

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Timeframe for future elections & "Release stewards"

On 16-09-07 01:59 PM, Ian Cordasco wrote: -Original Message- From: Anita Kuno <ante...@anteaya.info> Reply: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> Date: September 7, 2016 at 12:03:25 To: openstack-dev@lists.o

Re: [openstack-dev] [security] [salt] Removal of Security and OpenStackSalt project teams from the Big Tent

On 16-09-21 05:08 PM, Davanum Srinivas wrote: Jakub, Please see below. On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 3:46 PM, Jakub Pavlik wrote: Hello all, it took us 2 years of hard working to get these official. OpenStack-Salt is now used by around 40 production deployments and it is

Re: [openstack-dev] P and Q naming: all hail Pike and Queens

On 16-08-18 10:59 AM, Monty Taylor wrote: Hey everybody, As you all know, voting is only one step in the selection process. We also have to have vetting done on the choices to identify risk associated with the selected names. This time around, the top choice by vote for both P and Q was too

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Retiring stale stadium projects

On 16-09-27 09:18 PM, Armando M. wrote: Hi Neutrinos, I wanted to double check with you the state of these following projects: - networking-ofagent - python-neutron-pd-driver It's my understanding that they are ready for retirement or thereabouts. Please confirm, and I'll kick off the

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] open question to the candidates

On 16-10-03 11:30 AM, gordon chung wrote: hi, as there are many candidates this TC election, i figured i'd ask a question to better understand the candidates from the usual sales pitch in self-nominations. hopefully, this will give some insights into the candidates for those who haven't voted

Re: [openstack-dev] [packaging][rpm] 3rd-party gates promotion to voting gates

On 16-09-26 07:48 AM, Haïkel wrote: Hi, following our discussions about 3rd party gates in RPM packaging project, I suggest that we vote in order to promote the following gates as voting: - MOS CI - SUSE CI After promotion, all patchsets submitted will have to validate these gates in order to

[openstack-dev] [elections] TC candidacy

OpenStack ensures people have a choice. We give developers choices, which gives deployers choices, which ensures consumers have choices. We make choices, evaluate results, revisit and choose again. OpenStack creates space; personal space, public space. The choice is available. By virtue of

Re: [openstack-dev] [release][ptl] pausing releases until 1 Nov

On 2016-10-20 05:13 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote: On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 9:27 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: It's late in the week and the release and infra teams need to see to our travel preparations. I am declaring the releases repository frozen until the Tuesday after summit,

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Stepping back

On 2016-11-22 11:39 AM, Andrew Laski wrote: I should have sent this weeks ago but I'm a bad person who forgets common courtesy. My employment situation has changed in a way that does not afford me the necessary time to remain a regular contributor to Nova, or the broader OpenStack community. So

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Stepping down from core

On 2016-11-17 01:42 PM, Carl Baldwin wrote: Neutron (and Openstack), It is with regret that I report that my work situation has changed such that I'm not able to keep up with my duties as a Neutron core reviewer, L3 lieutenant, and drivers team member. My participation has dropped off

Re: [openstack-dev] [elections][tc]Thoughts on the TC election process

On 2016-10-04 04:53 PM, Anita Kuno wrote: On 16-10-04 12:54 PM, Thierry Carrez wrote: Doug Hellmann wrote: John Davidge wrote: Thierry, I'm surprised by your open hostility towards candidates. Accusing people of 'pretending' to care about things that they've taken the time

Re: [openstack-dev] [elections][tc]Thoughts on the TC election process

On 2016-10-11 12:57 PM, Thiago da Silva wrote: On 10/11/2016 12:00 PM, Ed Leafe wrote: On Oct 11, 2016, at 10:37 AM, Anita Kuno <ante...@anteaya.info> wrote: Just in case folks care, now is the best time to discuss our election process and suggest options or changes for the next

Re: [openstack-dev] [elections][tc]Thoughts on the TC election process

On 2016-10-11 12:55 PM, Ruby Loo wrote: On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 12:08 PM, Chris Dent wrote: Based on the turnout numbers and a bit of unscientific number crunching on the voting results it seems that the electorate was rather more engaged this time around. That's

Re: [openstack-dev] [elections][tc]Thoughts on the TC election process

On 2016-10-11 12:00 PM, Ed Leafe wrote: On Oct 11, 2016, at 10:37 AM, Anita Kuno <ante...@anteaya.info> wrote: Just in case folks care, now is the best time to discuss our election process and suggest options or changes for the next round of elections. I'm not adverse to discussing it

Re: [openstack-dev] [elections][tc]Thoughts on the TC election process

On 2016-10-11 12:08 PM, Chris Dent wrote: Based on the turnout numbers and a bit of unscientific number crunching on the voting results it seems that the electorate was rather more engaged this time around. That's _great_. As others have said I imagine some significant part of that was because

Re: [openstack-dev] [elections][tc]Thoughts on the TC election process

On 2016-10-11 01:40 PM, Ed Leafe wrote: On Oct 11, 2016, at 12:17 PM, Anita Kuno <ante...@anteaya.info> wrote: There really needs to be a period when a) we know who all the candidates are, and b) voting has not yet begun. Why? The voting period is open for a period of several days,

Re: [openstack-dev] [elections][tc]Thoughts on the TC election process

On 2016-10-11 01:43 PM, Ed Leafe wrote: On Oct 11, 2016, at 12:26 PM, Anita Kuno <ante...@anteaya.info> wrote: Instead of two week process, make it three: Again as I replied to Ed's post, I think we can find options that fit in the current timeframe. Why do we need a week to nominate

Re: [openstack-dev] [elections][tc]Thoughts on the TC election process

On 2016-10-11 01:42 PM, Chris Dent wrote: On Tue, 11 Oct 2016, Anita Kuno wrote: * Getting rid of self nomination. Nominations come from the electorate at large. They can be refused of course. What is the current problem with self nomination? (I almost missed this since it was after your

Re: [openstack-dev] [elections][tc]Thoughts on the TC election process

On 2016-10-11 02:35 PM, Thiago da Silva wrote: On 10/11/2016 01:21 PM, Anita Kuno wrote: On 2016-10-11 12:57 PM, Thiago da Silva wrote: On 10/11/2016 12:00 PM, Ed Leafe wrote: On Oct 11, 2016, at 10:37 AM, Anita Kuno <ante...@anteaya.info> wrote: Just in case folks care, now is th

Re: [openstack-dev] [elections][tc]Thoughts on the TC election process

On 2016-10-11 02:07 PM, Clay Gerrard wrote: On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 10:52 AM, Anita Kuno <ante...@anteaya.info> wrote: On 2016-10-11 01:40 PM, Ed Leafe wrote: On Oct 11, 2016, at 12:17 PM, Anita Kuno <ante...@anteaya.info> wrote: There really needs to be a period when a) we

Re: [openstack-dev] [release][ptl] not planning to serve as release PTL for Pike

On 2017-01-13 03:19 PM, Steve Martinelli wrote: +++ Thanks for making it 100x easier to release new libraries, it's now something I look forward to. On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 3:11 PM, Davanum Srinivas wrote: Many thanks for all the automation and all other initiatives Doug!

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][tc] Allowing Teams Based on Vendor-specific Drivers

On 2016-11-29 11:27 AM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: I think we also need to look harder at the reasons for driver-only developer teams seeking official status. If it's because they want to be part of the community and help collaborate with the rest of us, then as long as they can do that consistent

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Stepping down from core

On 2016-12-01 05:51 PM, Henry Gessau wrote: I've already communicated this in the neutron meeting and in some neutron policy patches, but yesterday the PTL actually updated the gerrit ACLs so I thought I'd drop a note here too. My work situation has changed and leaves me little time to keep up

Re: [openstack-dev] [docs] Stepping down from core

On 2016-12-21 11:11 AM, Matt Kassawara wrote: Howdy! After several years of contributing to OpenStack documentation, a significant change in my career path warrants resigning from my role as a core reviewer. Working with the OpenStack community was a great experience and I hope it continues to

Re: [openstack-dev] Retire the radar project?

On 2016-12-21 07:02 PM, Michael Still wrote: Hi, radar was an antique effort to import some outside-OpenStack code that did CI reliability dashboarding. It was never really a thing, and has been abandoned over time. The last commit that wasn't part of a project wide change series was in

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] Declaring explicit minimum database versions

On 2017-08-15 11:59 AM, Monty Taylor wrote: stabbing himself in the eyes yesterday I find it interesting that I was just about to read this article: https://www.thestar.com/opinion/commentary/2017/08/15/boys-and-men-must-do-the-right-thing-it-will-save-female-lives.html when I noticed Monty

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][barbican][freezer][horizon][karbor][keystone][mistral][nova][pack-deb][refstack][solum][storlets][swift][tacker][telemetry][watcher][zaqar] Last days for PTL candidate announ

On 2017-08-07 03:50 PM, Kendall Nelson wrote: Hello Everyone :) A quick reminder that we are in the last days for PTL candidate announcements. If you want to stand for PTL, don't delay, follow the instructions at [1] to make sure the community knows your intentions. Make sure your candidacy

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][barbican][freezer][horizon][karbor][keystone][mistral][nova][pack-deb][refstack][solum][storlets][swift][tacker][telemetry][watcher][zaqar] Last days for PTL candidate announ

On 2017-08-11 10:21 AM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: On 2017-08-11 09:37:08 +0200 (+0200), Flavio Percoco wrote: On 10/08/17 14:04 -0400, Anita Kuno wrote: [...] Also to clarify, the election officials serve the TC, not the other way around. I would like to clarify this sentence, though. I do

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] Non-candidacy for Queens cycle Infrastructure PTL

On 2017-07-26 12:55 PM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: On 2017-07-26 11:44:17 -0500 (-0500), Sean McGinnis wrote: Thank you for all your work Jeremy. The fact that most don't think about and aren't aware of all that infra does is a testament to how well things have been running. To quote Ken Keeler

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][tc] How to deal with confusion around "hosted projects"

On 2017-06-28 10:50 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: For (1) we could have an "onboarding" project team that would help incoming projects through the initial steps of becoming an openstack project. The team would act as an umbrella team, an experimental area for projects that have some potential to

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][all] Do we need a #openstack-tc IRC channel

On 2017-05-16 11:46 AM, Sean Dague wrote: On 05/16/2017 11:17 AM, Sean McGinnis wrote: On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 09:38:34AM -0400, Davanum Srinivas wrote: Folks, See $TITLE :) Thanks, Dims My preference would be to have an #openstack-tc channel. One thing I like about the dedicated meeting

Re: [openstack-dev] Save the Date- Queens PTG

On 2017-05-24 04:16 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: Monty Taylor wrote: On 05/23/2017 06:27 PM, Anita Kuno wrote: My mistake I mis-read, $149 USD is equal to $201 CDN (Canadian currency), so it looks like the same price to me. I believe (although I do not know for absolute certain) that the prices

Re: [openstack-dev] Save the Date- Queens PTG

On 2017-04-05 06:05 PM, Erin Disney wrote: We are excited to announce the September Project Teams Gathering in Denver, CO at the Denver Renaissance Stapleton Hotel this September 11th-15th. As mentioned at the Atlanta PTG feedback session in February, we had narrowed down our PTG location

Re: [openstack-dev] Save the Date- Queens PTG

On 2017-05-23 07:25 PM, Anita Kuno wrote: On 2017-04-05 06:05 PM, Erin Disney wrote: We are excited to announce the September Project Teams Gathering in Denver, CO at the Denver Renaissance Stapleton Hotel this September 11th-15th. As mentioned at the Atlanta PTG feedback session in February

Re: [openstack-dev] It's time...

On 2017-10-04 11:17 AM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: On 2017-10-04 22:21:32 +0800 (+0800), Tom Fifield wrote: [...] the timing is right for me to step down as your Community Manager. [...] Your tireless assistance will be missed. I'm lucky to have been able to count you as a colleague all these

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   >