Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] Making stack outputs static

On 06/09/2017 03:10 PM, Zane Bitter wrote: History lesson: a long, long time ago we made a very big mistake. We treated stack outputs as things that would be resolved dynamically when you requested them, instead of having values fixed at the time the template was created or updated. This makes

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] pike m2 has been released

Hmm, I was expecting an instack-undercloud release as part of m2. Is there a reason we didn't do that? On 06/08/2017 03:47 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote: We have a new release of TripleO, pike milestone 2. All bugs targeted on Pike-2 have been moved into Pike-3. I'll take care of moving the

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] [ci] Adding idempotency job on overcloud deployment.

On 06/08/2017 10:16 AM, Emilien Macchi wrote: On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 1:47 PM, Sofer Athlan-Guyot wrote: Hi, Alex Schultz writes: On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 5:20 AM, Sofer Athlan-Guyot wrote: Hi, Emilien Macchi

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Ansible roles repo and how to inject them into the overcloud

On 06/07/2017 09:25 AM, Juan Antonio Osorio wrote: Hi folks! I would like to know if there are thoughts about where to put tripleo-specific ansible roles. I've been working lately on a role that would deploy ipsec tunnels for most networks in an overcloud [1]. And I think that would be quite

[openstack-dev] [TripleO] PSA: Please WIP your WIP patches

This makes it easier to filter them out when looking for wayward patches. Right now the list of 15 oldest reviews includes at least 5 WIP patches that weren't marked as such in Gerrit. For anyone who's not aware, to mark a patch WIP in Gerrit you set Workflow -1 on it. Anyone can do that to

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] rh1 issues post-mortem

On 03/28/2017 05:01 PM, Ben Nemec wrote: Final (hopefully) update: All active compute nodes have been rebooted and things seem to be stable again. Jobs are even running a little faster, so I'm thinking this had a detrimental effect on performance too. I've set a reminder for about two

Re: [openstack-dev] Security bug in diskimage-builder

On 06/01/2017 11:31 AM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: On 2017-06-01 10:40:34 -0500 (-0500), Ben Nemec wrote: [...] Okay, so we're all set up, but now it appears we're all subscribed to every tripleo bug as well. I think oslo-coresec used to be the same way, but at some point it changed so I only get

Re: [openstack-dev] Security bug in diskimage-builder

On 05/30/2017 10:05 AM, Emilien Macchi wrote: On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 3:43 PM, Ben Nemec <openst...@nemebean.com> wrote: On 05/30/2017 08:00 AM, Emilien Macchi wrote: On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 9:02 PM, Jeremy Stanley <fu...@yuggoth.org> wrote: On 2017-05-29 15:43:43 +0200 (+02

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] custom configuration to overcloud fails second time

I think we would need to see what your custom config templates look like as well. Also note that it's generally not recommended to drop environment files from your deploy command unless you explicitly want to stop applying them. So if you applied myconfig_1.yaml and then later want to apply

Re: [openstack-dev] Security bug in diskimage-builder

On 05/30/2017 08:00 AM, Emilien Macchi wrote: On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 9:02 PM, Jeremy Stanley <fu...@yuggoth.org> wrote: On 2017-05-29 15:43:43 +0200 (+0200), Emilien Macchi wrote: On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 7:45 PM, Ben Nemec <openst...@nemebean.com> wrote: [...] Emilien, I thi

[openstack-dev] [TripleO] Passing along some field feedback

Hi, As some of you may know, I have a weekly meeting with some of the Red Hat folks who are out in the field using TripleO to deploy OpenStack at customer sites. The past couple of weeks have been particularly interesting, so I thought I'd take a moment to disseminate the comments to the

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][scheduler] Anyone relying on the host_subset_size config option?

On 05/26/2017 12:17 PM, Edward Leafe wrote: [resending to include the operators list] The host_subset_size configuration option was added to the scheduler to help eliminate race conditions when two requests for a similar VM would be processed close together, since the scheduler’s algorithm

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements][tripleo][heat] Projects holding back requirements updates

On 05/26/2017 04:22 AM, Steven Hardy wrote: On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 03:15:13PM -0500, Ben Nemec wrote: Tagging with tripleo and heat teams for the os-*-config projects. I'm not sure which owns them now, but it sounds like we need a new release. I think they're still owned by the TripleO

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements][tripleo][heat] Projects holding back requirements updates

Tagging with tripleo and heat teams for the os-*-config projects. I'm not sure which owns them now, but it sounds like we need a new release. On 05/22/2017 10:32 AM, Matthew Thode wrote: This is just a friendly reminder that without a release from master, if your project still caps a

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] A proposal for hackathon to reduce deploy time of TripleO

On 05/23/2017 05:47 AM, Sagi Shnaidman wrote: Hi, all I'd like to propose an idea to make one or two days hackathon in TripleO project with main goal - to reduce deployment time of TripleO. - How could it be arranged? We can arrange a separate IRC channel and Bluejeans video conference

Re: [openstack-dev] Security bug in diskimage-builder

On 05/17/2017 10:46 AM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: On 2017-05-17 15:57:16 +0300 (+0300), George Shuklin wrote: There is a bug in diskimage-builder I reported it at 2017-03-10 as 'private security'. I think this bug is a medium severity. So far there was no reaction at all. I plan to change this

[openstack-dev] [tripleo] Sample Environment Generator

I've finally gotten back to working on this spec[1] and wanted to send a quick update. The patch series is updated with the changes we discussed at the PTG, and you can find the start of it here: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/253638/ Obviously there are a _lot_ of environments left to

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][concurrency] lockutils lock fairness / starvation

On 05/15/2017 03:24 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: Excerpts from Legacy, Allain's message of 2017-05-15 19:20:46 +: -Original Message- From: Doug Hellmann [mailto:d...@doughellmann.com] Sent: Monday, May 15, 2017 2:55 PM <...> Excerpts from Legacy, Allain's message of 2017-05-15

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][oslo.messaging] Call to deprecate the 'pika' driver in the oslo.messaging project

On 05/15/2017 01:55 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: Excerpts from Davanum Srinivas (dims)'s message of 2017-05-15 14:27:36 -0400: On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 2:08 PM, Ken Giusti wrote: Folks, It was decided at the oslo.messaging forum at summit that the pika driver will be marked

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Validations before upgrades and updates

On 05/08/2017 06:45 AM, Marios Andreou wrote: Hi folks, after some discussion locally with colleagues about improving the upgrades experience, one of the items that came up was pre-upgrade and update validations. I took an AI to look at the current status of tripleo-validations [0] and posted

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO][CI] Bridging the production/CI workflow gap with large periodic CI jobs

lines should work. It may also need a larger controller flavor so the controller(s) don't OOM with that many computes, but if we've got a custom env for this use case anyway that should be doable too. On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 12:30 PM, Ben Nemec <openst...@nemebean.com> wrote: TLDR: W

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO][CI] Bridging the production/CI workflow gap with large periodic CI jobs

TLDR: We have the capacity to do this. One scale job can be absorbed into our existing test infrastructure with minimal impact. On 04/19/2017 07:50 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote: On 18/04/17 14:28 -0400, Emilien Macchi wrote: On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 3:52 PM, Justin Kilpatrick

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo][release] release-model of tripleo-common

On 04/18/2017 10:29 PM, Steve Baker wrote: On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 1:14 PM, Doug Hellmann > wrote: Excerpts from Steve Baker's message of 2017-04-19 13:05:37 +1200: > Other than being consumed as a library, tripleo-common is the

Re: [openstack-dev] Development workflow for bunch of patches

On 04/19/2017 03:11 AM, Sławek Kapłoński wrote: Hello, I have a question about how to deal with bunch of patches which depends one on another. I did patch to neutron (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/449831/) which is not merged yet but I wanted to start also another patch which is depend on

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO][CI] Bridging the production/CI workflow gap with large periodic CI jobs

On 04/17/2017 02:52 PM, Justin Kilpatrick wrote: Because CI jobs tend to max out about 5 nodes there's a whole class of minor bugs that make it into releases. What happens is that they never show up in small clouds, then when they do show up in larger testing clouds the people deploying those

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] pingtest vs tempest

On 04/17/2017 10:51 AM, Emilien Macchi wrote: We haven't got much feedback from TripleO core reviewers, who are usually more involved on this topic. I'll give a chance to let them talk because we take some actions based on the feedback brought in this discussion. I started to write a

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][infra][pbr] Nominating Stephen Finucane for pbr-core

+1 On 04/12/2017 08:14 AM, Monty Taylor wrote: Hey all, As I'm sure you all know, pbr is both our most pervasively used dependency and our least well understood. Nobody ever wants to look at the code (sorry, I can write ugly code sometimes - but also wow setuptools) or dig in to figure out

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo][manila] Ganesha deployment

On 04/11/2017 02:00 PM, Giulio Fidente wrote: On Tue, 2017-04-11 at 16:50 +0200, Jan Provaznik wrote: On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 6:55 PM, Ben Nemec <openst...@nemebean.com> wrote: On 04/10/2017 03:22 AM, Jan Provaznik wrote: Well, on second thought it might be possible to make the S

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo][manila] Ganesha deployment

I'm not really an expert on composable roles so I'll leave that to someone else, but see my thoughts inline on the networking aspect. On 04/10/2017 03:22 AM, Jan Provaznik wrote: 2) define a new VIP (for IP failover) and 2 networks for NfsStorage role: a) a frontend network between users

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] spec-lite process for tripleo

On 03/28/2017 11:09 AM, Emilien Macchi wrote: Bringing an old topic on the table. We might have noticed: 1. Some tripleo-specs take huge amount of time before getting merged (or even reviewed). We have been asking folks to review them every week but unfortunately they don't get much

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] rh1 issues post-mortem

using this environment. On 03/24/2017 12:48 PM, Ben Nemec wrote: To follow-up on this, we've continued to hit this issue on other compute nodes. Not surprising, of course. They've all been up for about the same period of time and have had largely even workloads. It has caused problems though

Re: [openstack-dev] [deployment][TripleO][kolla][ansible][fuel] Next steps for cross project collaboration

On 03/02/2017 08:27 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote: On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 11:20 AM, Emilien Macchi wrote: On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 11:02 AM, Steven Hardy wrote: Hi all, Over the recent PTG, and previously at the design summit in Barcelona, we've had some

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] rh1 issues post-mortem

months before we have to worry about this again. On 03/24/2017 11:47 AM, Derek Higgins wrote: On 22 March 2017 at 22:36, Ben Nemec <openst...@nemebean.com> wrote: Hi all (owl?), You may have missed it in all the ci excitement the past couple of days, but we had a partial outage of rh

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra][tripleo] initial discussion for a new periodic pipeline

>> >> On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 11:16 PM, Paul Belanger <pabelan...@redhat.com <mailto:pabelan...@redhat.com>> >> wrote: >> >> > On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 03:42:32PM -0500, Ben Nemec wrote: >> > > >>

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra][tripleo] initial discussion for a new periodic pipeline

17 at 11:16 PM, Paul Belanger <pabelan...@redhat.com <mailto:pabelan...@redhat.com>> wrote: On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 03:42:32PM -0500, Ben Nemec wrote: > > > On 03/13/2017 02:29 PM, Sagi Shnaidman wrote: > > Hi, all > > > > I submitted a

[openstack-dev] [dib][heat] dib-utils/dib-run-parts/dib v2 concern

While looking through the dib v2 changes after the feature branch was merged to master, I noticed this commit[1], which bring dib-run-parts back into dib itself. Unfortunately I missed the original proposal to do this, but I have some concerns about the impact of this change. Originally the

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra][tripleo] initial discussion for a new periodic pipeline

On 03/13/2017 02:29 PM, Sagi Shnaidman wrote: Hi, all I submitted a change: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/443964/ but seems like it reached a point which requires an additional discussion. I had a few proposals, it's increasing period to 12 hours instead of 4 for start, and to leave it in

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo][diskimage-builder] Status of diskimage-builder

On 03/03/2017 03:25 AM, Ligong LG1 Duan wrote: I am wondering whether DIB can become a component of Glance, as DIB is used to create OS images and Glance to upload OS images. I see a big difference between creating images and storing them. I can't imagine Glance would have any interest in

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo][diskimage-builder] Status of diskimage-builder

On 03/02/2017 03:31 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote: On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 3:06 PM, Yolanda Robla Mota wrote: From my point of view, i've been using that either on infra with puppet-infracloud, glean.. and now with TripleO. So in my opinion, it shall be an independent

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] PTG summary

On 02/27/2017 03:30 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: Excerpts from ChangBo Guo's message of 2017-02-25 00:07:21 +0800: Oslo folks, This is summary of oslo PTG schedule during one and half days. You can check the details in etherpad link: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/oslo-ptg-pike 1.

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Atlanta PTG

On 02/22/2017 03:27 AM, Marios Andreou wrote: On 22/02/17 10:25, Carlos Camacho Gonzalez wrote: Thanks Emilien! I think will be enough just by sharing a mic and the Etherpad notes. ++ thanks very much Emilien - it can be very effective/useful as long as people remember to use the mic

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] TripleO Ocata release blockers

On 02/13/2017 12:52 PM, Ben Nemec wrote: On 02/12/2017 02:24 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote: Quick updates: - All FFEs patches have been merged except: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/330050/ - so we're green on this side. - Upgrade team is still working on automation to upgrade from newton

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] TripleO Ocata release blockers

On 02/12/2017 02:24 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote: Quick updates: - All FFEs patches have been merged except: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/330050/ - so we're green on this side. - Upgrade team is still working on automation to upgrade from newton to ocata. - ovb-updates (CI job with IPv6)

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Moving mirror server images to tarballs.o.o (Was: [rdo-list] RDO-CI Scrum Weekly Scrum Recap)

On 02/08/2017 01:28 PM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: On 2017-02-08 14:10:16 -0500 (-0500), Paul Belanger wrote: [...] We basically create a publisher in JJB to handle this, which looks in the $WORKSPACE/images folder for things to scp to tarballs.o.o. Take a look at the kolla job for example. What

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] pbr and warnerrors status

On 02/08/2017 09:41 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote: Excerpts from Ben Nemec's message of 2017-02-08 09:20:31 -0600: On 02/08/2017 01:53 AM, Andreas Jaeger wrote: On 2017-02-08 00:56, Ian Cordasco wrote: On Feb 7, 2017 5:47 PM, "Joshua Harlow"

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] pbr and warnerrors status

On 02/08/2017 01:53 AM, Andreas Jaeger wrote: On 2017-02-08 00:56, Ian Cordasco wrote: On Feb 7, 2017 5:47 PM, "Joshua Harlow" > wrote: Likely just never pulled the trigger. Seems like we should pull it though. Will have to

[openstack-dev] [oslo] pbr and warnerrors status

Someone just spent a bunch of effort fixing all the warnings in our docs project and I'd like to turn on warnerrors so we keep it that way. Unfortunately, I discovered that warnerrors is still not effective in setup.cfg. After digging a little more, I see we never released pbr after the

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo][ui] Now with translations :)

On 02/06/2017 05:38 AM, Julie Pichon wrote: Hi folks, You may have noticed a new type of patch in our queue this morning [1]. There's a nice link in the commit message [2][3] that describes what to do with it (TL;DR: check the structure is correct, merge it quickly - most projects have a

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] FFE for novajoin in TripleO's undercloud

On 02/03/2017 10:21 AM, Juan Antonio Osorio wrote: On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 5:31 PM, Ben Nemec <openst...@nemebean.com <mailto:openst...@nemebean.com>> wrote: On 02/02/2017 06:27 PM, Juan Antonio Osorio wrote: Hello, I would like to request an FFE to prop

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] FFE for novajoin in TripleO's undercloud

On 02/02/2017 06:27 PM, Juan Antonio Osorio wrote: Hello, I would like to request an FFE to properly support the novajoin vendordata plugin in TripleO. Most of the work has landed, however, we still need to add it to TripleO's CI in order to have it officially supported. This is crucial for

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Proposing Dmitry Tantsur and Alex Schultz as instack-undercloud cores

On 01/31/2017 11:03 AM, James Slagle wrote: On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 11:02 AM, Ben Nemec <openst...@nemebean.com> wrote: In the spirit of all the core team changes, here are a couple more I'd like to propose. Dmitry has been very helpful reviewing in instack-undercloud for a long t

[openstack-dev] [TripleO] Proposing Dmitry Tantsur and Alex Schultz as instack-undercloud cores

In the spirit of all the core team changes, here are a couple more I'd like to propose. Dmitry has been very helpful reviewing in instack-undercloud for a long time so this is way overdue. I'm also going to propose that he be able to +2 anything Ironic-related in TripleO since that is his

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Proposing Sergey (Sagi) Shnaidman for core on tripleo-ci

+1 On 01/24/2017 11:03 AM, Juan Antonio Osorio wrote: Sagi (sshnaidm on IRC) has done significant work in TripleO CI (both on the current CI solution and in getting tripleo-quickstart jobs for it); So I would like to propose him as part of the TripleO CI core team. I think he'll make a great

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Update TripleO core members

+1 On 01/23/2017 01:03 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote: Greeting folks, I would like to propose some changes in our core members: - Remove Jay Dobies who has not been active in TripleO for a while (thanks Jay for your hard work!). - Add Flavio Percoco core on tripleo-common and

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo][puppet] Preparations for Ocata release in RDO

On 01/20/2017 08:06 AM, Alfredo Moralejo Alonso wrote: On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 1:50 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote: On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 7:30 AM, Alfredo Moralejo Alonso wrote: Hi, In RDO we are preparing for the incoming Ocata release. This means

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Upstream backwards compatibility job for Newton oooq

On 01/17/2017 09:57 AM, mathieu bultel wrote: On 01/17/2017 04:42 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote: On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 9:34 AM, mathieu bultel wrote: Hi Adriano On 01/17/2017 03:05 PM, Adriano Petrich wrote: So I want to make a backwards compatibility job upstream so from

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Release notes in TripleO

On 01/11/2017 08:24 AM, Emilien Macchi wrote: On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 9:21 AM, Emilien Macchi wrote: Greetings, OpenStack has been using reno [1] to manage release notes for a while now and it has been proven to be super useful. Puppet OpenStack project adopted it in

[openstack-dev] [infra] Any way to disable zuul status page auto-refresh?

The subject pretty much covers it. When there are a lot of jobs on the zuul status page, it kind of brings my browser to its knees, which makes it hard to navigate the page. I know you can filter it, but sometimes I want to see all of the jobs in a queue so that isn't always an option. If

[openstack-dev] [TripleO] DB cleanup cron jobs added to rh1

Just a heads up for everyone, I've added some DB cleanup jobs to rh1 which will hopefully prevent the performance degradations over time that we've been seeing in that environment. Specifically, the crontab now looks like this: # Clean up heat db 0 5 * * * heat-manage purge_deleted 7 #

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Network Configuration in TripleO UI

On 12/08/2016 08:05 AM, Jiri Tomasek wrote: Hi all, I've been investigating how to implement TripleO network configuration in TripleO UI. Based on my findings I'd like to propose a solution. tl;dr proposal: Slightly refactor Network environment files to match GUI usage, Use Jinja Templating

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo][ci] jobs shuffle to add IPv6 coverage

On 11/15/2016 10:41 AM, Gabriele Cerami wrote: On 18 Oct, Gabriele Cerami wrote: Hello, after adding coverage in CI for HA IPv6 scenario here https://review.openstack.org/363674 we wanted to add IPv6 testing on the gates. To not use any more resources the first suggestion to add IPv6 to the

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][tc] Exposing project team's metadata in README files

On 11/30/2016 10:39 AM, Steve Martinelli wrote: Refresh (not from cache)? Ugh, yeah that was it. Sorry for the noise. On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 11:23 AM, Ben Nemec <openst...@nemebean.com <mailto:openst...@nemebean.com>> wrote: On 11/30/2016 10:19 AM, Jaso

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][tc] Exposing project team's metadata in README files

On 11/30/2016 10:19 AM, Jason Rist wrote: On 11/30/2016 11:18 AM, Ben Nemec wrote: On 11/30/2016 03:34 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote: On 25/11/16 13:46 +, Amrith Kumar wrote: Flavio, I see a number of patches[1] which have been landed on this project but I find that at least the ones

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][tc] Exposing project team's metadata in README files

On 11/30/2016 03:34 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote: On 25/11/16 13:46 +, Amrith Kumar wrote: Flavio, I see a number of patches[1] which have been landed on this project but I find that at least the ones that were landed for Trove, and a random sampling of the others all to be different from

Re: [openstack-dev] Openstack TripleO Newton install [TripleO] [OpenStack-docs]

On 11/23/2016 10:45 AM, Julie Pichon wrote: Hi Kent, On 23 November 2016 at 16:08, Gordon, Kent wrote: Does documentation exist for a TripleO Newton install ? I have looked at both http://docs.openstack.org/developer/tripleo-docs/index.html

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] POC patch for using tripleo-repos for repo setup

On 11/22/2016 08:18 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote: Even if I was part of those who approved this feature, I still have some comments, inline: On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 1:30 PM, Alex Schultz <aschu...@redhat.com> wrote: On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 11:06 AM, Ben Nemec <openst...@nemebean.c

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] POC patch for using tripleo-repos for repo setup

On 11/21/2016 05:26 PM, Alex Schultz wrote: On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 2:57 PM, Ben Nemec <openst...@nemebean.com> wrote: Hi, I have a POC patch[1] up to demonstrate the use of the tripleo-repos tool [2] as a replacement for most of tripleo.sh --repo-setup. It has now passed all of the C

[openstack-dev] [tripleo] POC patch for using tripleo-repos for repo setup

Hi, I have a POC patch[1] up to demonstrate the use of the tripleo-repos tool [2] as a replacement for most of tripleo.sh --repo-setup. It has now passed all of the CI jobs so I wanted to solicit some feedback. There are a few changes related to repo naming because the tool names repo

Re: [openstack-dev] Fedora AArch64 (64-bit ARM) support in diskimage-builder

On 11/11/2016 10:55 AM, dmar...@redhat.com wrote: I have been looking at using diskimage-builder on Fedora AArch64. While there is 64-bit ARM support for Ubuntu (arm64), there appear to be a few things missing for Fedora. Is this the correct list to ask questions, and propose minor changes

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] proposing Michele Baldessari part of core team

+1 On 11/04/2016 12:40 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote: MIchele Baldessari (bandini on IRC) has consistently demonstrated high levels of contributions in TripleO projects, specifically in High Availability area where's he's for us a guru (I still don't understand how pacemaker works, but hopefully he

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO][CI] Isolated Network Testing

(in the near future) Within those four scenarios, we should ensure that we are testing both IPv4 and IPv6, and both traditional Neutron SNAT/Floating IPs and DVR. The first scenario is well covered. I think scenario 2 is covered by a review posted by Ben Nemec recently [1]. I would very much like

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Default the HA scenario to Ceph

On 10/12/2016 06:10 AM, Giulio Fidente wrote: hi, we introduced support for the deployment of Ceph in the liberty release so that it could optionally be used as backend for one or more of Cinder, Glance, Nova and more recently Gnocchi. We used to deploy Ceph MONs on the controller nodes and

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] website update

On 10/11/2016 02:42 PM, Dan Prince wrote: A quick update on the tripleo.org website outage today. We are in the process of moving the server to a new host location. Until DNS updates please use the following URL if you want to access the CI status report: http://66.187.229.219/cistatus.html

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo][ci] Temporary increase for the OVB undercloud instance memory

On 09/22/2016 09:36 AM, Gabriele Cerami wrote: Hi, As reported on this bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1626483 HA gate and periodic jobs for master and sometimes newton started to fail for errors related to memory shortage. Memory on undercloud instance was increased to 8G less

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Network Template Generator

On 09/09/2016 10:28 AM, Liz Blanchard wrote: On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 7:10 PM, Ben Nemec <openst...@nemebean.com <mailto:openst...@nemebean.com>> wrote: On 08/10/2016 11:05 AM, Liz Blanchard wrote: > > > On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 11:52 AM, Ben Nemec &l

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Third party CI setup for OVS-DPDK and SRIOV

On 09/15/2016 09:53 AM, Sanjay Upadhyay wrote: HI Folks, I am reaching out to understand how best to setup a third party CI for OVS-DPDK and SRIOV . Since, we have put forth the patches for both sr-iov and

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] what's up in upgrades?

On 09/08/2016 01:27 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote: What's up in upgrades? 1) Undercloud: Mitaka to Newton We just approved a patch in openstack-infra/tripleo-ci that test undercloud upgrades. I don't think we should make it vote as for now it's quite experimental. Though I'm wondering if we

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Network Template Generator

On 08/10/2016 11:05 AM, Liz Blanchard wrote: > > > On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 11:52 AM, Ben Nemec <openst...@nemebean.com > <mailto:openst...@nemebean.com>> wrote: > > On 08/08/2016 09:22 PM, Dan Prince wrote: > > On Mon, 2016-0

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Network Template Generator

On 08/08/2016 09:22 PM, Dan Prince wrote: > On Mon, 2016-08-08 at 15:42 -0500, Ben Nemec wrote: >> This is something that has existed for a while, but I had been >> hesitant >> to evangelize it until it was a little more proven. At this point >> I've >> used it t

[openstack-dev] [TripleO] Network Template Generator

This is something that has existed for a while, but I had been hesitant to evangelize it until it was a little more proven. At this point I've used it to generate templates for a number of different environments, and it has worked well. I decided it was time to record another demo and throw it

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra][tripleo] status of tripleo-test-cloud-rh1

On 08/06/2016 07:17 PM, Paul Belanger wrote: > Greetings, > > 5 months ago fungi posted: > > [tripleo] becoming third party CI (was: enabling third party CI)[1] > > About having the discussion whether the existing TripleO CI should itself > follow > our third-party integration model instead

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Progress on overcloud upgrade / update jobs

On 08/05/2016 12:58 PM, Steven Hardy wrote: > On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 09:46:20PM -0400, Emilien Macchi wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I'm currently working by iteration to get a new upstream job that test >> upgrades and update. >> Until now, I'm doing baby steps. I bootstrapped the work to upgrade >>

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO][DIB] Proposal to move DIB to its own project team

As I noted in the meeting yesterday, I think the lack of response from TripleO regarding this topic is kind of answer enough. TripleO has moved away from having a heavy dependency on diskimage-builder (it's basically used to install some packages and a handful of elements that we haven't been

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] [UI] Version

On 07/27/2016 11:13 AM, Dougal Matthews wrote: > > > On Wednesday, 27 July 2016, Steven Hardy > wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 02:08:08PM +0100, Dougal Matthews wrote: > >On 27 July 2016 at 12:41, Honza Pokorny

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-track-chairs] [all][summit] Responding to questions on submitted summit talk?

or letting us know. >> Cheers, >> Uli >> >> -Original Message- >> From: Ben Nemec [mailto:openst...@nemebean.com] >> Sent: Monday, 25 July, 2016 17:32 >> To: Nikhil Komawar; OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage >> ques

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][summit] Responding to questions on submitted summit talk?

t [at] openstack [dot] org > <mailto:sum...@openstack.org> as required. > > On 7/25/16 10:55 AM, Ben Nemec wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I got a question from one of the track chairs on my presentation, but >> the email came from a noreply address and I don't see anywh

[openstack-dev] [all][summit] Responding to questions on submitted summit talk?

Hi, I got a question from one of the track chairs on my presentation, but the email came from a noreply address and I don't see anywhere on the submission page that I can respond to feedback. How are we supposed to do that? Thanks. -Ben

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] moving tripleo-ci/test-environments into THT

On 07/21/2016 11:31 AM, Steven Hardy wrote: > On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 10:32:23PM -0400, Emilien Macchi wrote: >> Hi, >> >> We're currently using tripleo-ci to store our test-environments files >> (ie: multinode.yaml, etc). >> To make it compatible with our different versions of TripleO, we have 2

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] tripleo-common bugs, bug tracking and launchpad tags

On 07/18/2016 06:28 AM, Julie Pichon wrote: > Hi, > > On Friday Dougal mentioned on IRC that he hadn't realised there was a > separate project for tripleo-common bugs on Launchpad [1] and that he'd > been using the TripleO main tracker [2] instead. > > Since the TripleO tracker is also used for

Re: [openstack-dev] [DIB] [Ironic] [TripleO] Moving IPA element out of DIB tree

I think this probably makes sense, but some more thoughts inline. On 07/15/2016 03:13 PM, Stephane Miller wrote: > To better support diskimage-builder based IPA images going forward, we'd > like to move the ironic-agent element into the ironic-python-agent > repository. This will involve: > > -

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO][os-net-config] add support for NFV virtual switch

On 07/07/2016 05:45 PM, Xin Wu wrote: > Hi, > > This is Xin from Big Switch. I'm proposing to make os_net_config support > DPDK switch for NFV workloads. > Current os_net_config supports ovs_bridge, linux_bridge, ivs_bridge > and different types of interfaces. The os_net_config's abstraction

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO][docs]: Undercloud install fails with unavailability of oslo::cache

On 07/08/2016 12:27 PM, Paddu Krishnan (padkrish) wrote: > Thanks a lot for the reply. Pls see inline.. > > On 7/8/16, 7:47 AM, "Ben Nemec" <openst...@nemebean.com> wrote: > >> On 07/08/2016 12:58 AM, Paddu Krishnan (padkrish) wrote: >>>> Hell

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][oslo] Disable option value interpolation in oslo.config

On 07/08/2016 10:58 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote: > Excerpts from Ben Nemec's message of 2016-07-08 10:24:54 -0500: >> On 07/08/2016 09:14 AM, ChangBo Guo wrote: >>> Hi ALL, >>> >>> I have been working a bug [1] about option value interpolation in >>> oslo.config[2], in short, option value

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][oslo] Disable option value interpolation in oslo.config

On 07/08/2016 09:14 AM, ChangBo Guo wrote: > Hi ALL, > > I have been working a bug [1] about option value interpolation in > oslo.config[2], in short, option value interpolation can't handle > password containing special characters from environment variable and I > proposed a fix of provide way

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO][docs]: Undercloud install fails with unavailability of oslo::cache

On 07/08/2016 12:58 AM, Paddu Krishnan (padkrish) wrote: >> Hello, >> I am trying to install TripleO in a VM environment. It’s a basic install. >> I am following the instructions in >> >> http://docs.openstack.org/developer/tripleo-docs/installation/installation.html. >> I >> am following the

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Proposal for a new tool: dlrn-repo

, Ben Nemec wrote: > So our documented repo setup steps are three curls, a sed, and a > multi-line bash command. And the best part? That's not even what we > test. The commands we actually use in tripleo.sh --repo-setup consist > of the following: three curls, four seds, and (may

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Proposal for a new tool: dlrn-repo

On 06/13/2016 05:58 PM, Derek Higgins wrote: > On 13 June 2016 at 21:29, Ben Nemec <openst...@nemebean.com> wrote: >> So our documented repo setup steps are three curls, a sed, and a >> multi-line bash command. And the best part? That's not even what we >> test. T

[openstack-dev] [TripleO] Proposal for a new tool: dlrn-repo

So our documented repo setup steps are three curls, a sed, and a multi-line bash command. And the best part? That's not even what we test. The commands we actually use in tripleo.sh --repo-setup consist of the following: three curls, four seds, and (maybe) the same multi-line bash command.

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Nodes Registration workflow improvements

On 06/13/2016 12:10 PM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: > On 06/13/2016 06:28 PM, Ben Nemec wrote: >> On 06/13/2016 09:41 AM, Jiri Tomasek wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> As we are close to merging the initial Nodes Registration workflows and >>> action [1,

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Nodes Registration workflow improvements

On 06/13/2016 09:41 AM, Jiri Tomasek wrote: > Hi all, > > As we are close to merging the initial Nodes Registration workflows and > action [1, 2] using Mistral which successfully provides the current > registration logic via common API, I'd like to start discussion on how > to improve it so it

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   >