Flavio Percoco
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
a *little* while and make sure we
weren’t going to scare him off. ;-)
Seriously, Mike has been doing a great job collaborating with the existing
team and helping us make oslo.db sane.
+1
Big +1
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
___
OpenStack-dev
is:
openstack/marconi - openstack/zaqar
openstack/python-marconiclient - openstack/python-zaqarclient
openstack/marconi-specs - openstack/zaqar-specs
Thanks!
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev
that shows the latest results in a table format. (You may need to
force-reload in your browser to see the change.)
Beautiful! Thank you so much to everyone involved.
+1! Love this.
Yes, finally. One of the things I really wanted.
Thanks guys!
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
are really important. However, any
deployment should be considered as a good use case, whether it is big or
not, since they've such project deployed.
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http
and we
shouldn't hold all incubated projects on that.
Cheers,
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
help both projects to improve.
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org
.
Comments, thoughts ?
I like this proposal! +1 from me!
[1] https://blueprints.launchpad.net/openstack
[2] https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http
responsibilities.
Cheers,
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
requirements files.
/Ihar
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
___
OpenStack-dev
Flavio Percoco
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
the PTL to retain
those roles anyway...
+1 for letting the PTL take care of this.
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
.
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
`
- Complete the rename process with support from infra
2. Let this patch land, complete Glance's switch-over using namespaces
and then do the rename all together.
Do you have any other suggestion that would help avoiding namespaces
without blocking glance.store?
Thanks,
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio
Last summit, it was basically impossible to do any hallway talking and
even meet some folks face-2-face.
Other than that, I think the proposal is great and makes sense to me.
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack
On 08/27/2014 05:52 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
On Aug 27, 2014, at 11:14 AM, Flavio Percoco fla...@redhat.com wrote:
On 08/27/2014 04:31 PM, Sean Dague wrote:
So this change came in with adding glance.store -
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/115265/5/lib/glance, which I think is a
bad
cleanup of minor things in v1.1 and I believe we can make v2
happen in Kilo.
Thoughts?
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
Greetings,
I'd like to join the early coordination effort for design sessions. I've
shamelessly copied Doug's template for Oslo into a new etherpad so we
can start proposing sessions there.
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/kilo-zaqar-summit-topics
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
Greetings,
I'd like to join the early coordination effort for design sessions. I've
shamelessly copied Doug's template for Oslo into a new etherpad so we
can start proposing sessions there.
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/kilo-zaqar-summit-topics
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
in the
__init__ files. The problem, as Sean mentioned, is the way pip and
setuptools will install this packages, which ends up overwriting the
base __init__ file.
Thanks for the links, though.
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
___
OpenStack-dev
submitted ready to enable the gates for this driver.
Lets see what others think about this,
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
to oslo.utils yet. I expect to do it before the end of the
cycle but Murphy :)
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
-integrated-projects-use-cases
Thanks to all of you who attended the meeting, I'm looking forward to
your feedback and obviously the next meeting :)
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http
cases could be covered by Zaqar as-is.
Could you elaborate a bit more on #2? Especially on why you think Zaqar
as is can't serve this specific case?
Also, feel free to add use-cases to that etherpad if there's anything
missing. :D
Cheers,
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
Flavio Percoco
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
On 09/04/2014 01:15 PM, Chris Dent wrote:
On Thu, 4 Sep 2014, Flavio Percoco wrote:
Thanks for writing this up, interesting read.
Thank you for your feedback :)
Some comments in-line.
5. Ceilometer's recommended storage driver is still MongoDB, although
Ceilometer has now support
On 09/04/2014 02:14 PM, Sean Dague wrote:
On 09/04/2014 03:08 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
Greetings,
Last Tuesday the TC held the first graduation review for Zaqar. During
the meeting some concerns arose. I've listed those concerns below with
some comments hoping that it will help starting
to currently-integrated
projects...
+1
Cheers,
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
the email,
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
On 09/04/2014 07:08 PM, Clint Byrum wrote:
Excerpts from Flavio Percoco's message of 2014-09-04 06:01:45 -0700:
On 09/04/2014 02:14 PM, Sean Dague wrote:
On 09/04/2014 03:08 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
Greetings,
Last Tuesday the TC held the first graduation review for Zaqar. During
it and give it a try - or at least take a look at it.
Flavio
Monty
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
to not approve patches if they think it requires more
reviews.
Just my $0.02, I agree with the proposal of trusting cores and letting
them do 1x+2A when they think it's worth it.
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev
that is not tested in the gate, please, do test it in your own
environment.
If anything comes up, do not hesitate to contact me or any other
glance_core.
[0] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/100636/
[1] http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/glance_store
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
-projects-use-cases
[5] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/zaqar-overcloud-use-cases
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
pressured reviewing of 120300?
Why do you think landing 120300 will take long? If both patches are
already on gerrit, I'd rather review the real fix.
Is there a reason you think landing 120143 first is better?
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
with that!
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
On 09/10/2014 03:18 PM, Gordon Sim wrote:
On 09/10/2014 09:58 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
To clarify the doubts of what Zaqar is or it's not, let me quote what's
written in the project's overview section[0]:
Zaqar is a multi-tenant cloud messaging service for web developers.
How
.
Thanks a lot for your feedback,
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
this, Cindy.
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Thanks for providing very useful feedback, Clint.
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
being optimized for the use cases it aims to cover. The team has
put enough effort and reviews on these optimizations, which are
different from the ones you'd optimize rabbitmq for.
Thanks a lot Zane for taking the time to dig into this topic,
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
(or mailing
list)? I'm interested to know where you guys are with this, what is
missing and most importantly, how we can help.
Thanks Boris,
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http
Flavio Percoco
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
On 09/12/2014 11:36 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Flavio Percoco wrote:
On 09/12/2014 12:14 AM, Zane Bitter wrote:
The final question is the one of arbitrary access to messages in the
queue (or queue if you prefer). Flavio indicated that this effectively
came for free with their implementation
On 09/12/2014 01:56 PM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
On 09/12/2014 11:36 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Flavio Percoco wrote:
On 09/12/2014 12:14 AM, Zane Bitter wrote:
The final question is the one of arbitrary access to messages in the
queue (or queue if you prefer). Flavio indicated
running testr solves the problem you have
identified without introducing any side-effects.
This sounds saner to me so, I'd definitely go for this one.
(FWIW, I'm use to clean up `pyc` files by myself)
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
happen properly based on the resource usage,
flavors and other metrics.
Cheers,
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
more?
Thanks :)
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
here.
Agree with Sean. INFO are useful for investigations. WARN and ERROR are
cause for alarm.
+1 this is what we do in Zaqar as well.
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http
://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
and easier for everyone.
Cheers,
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
it is also
because of your contributions and support. You played a key role in the
project's growth and we all thank you a lot for that.
I'm sad to see you go and I wish you luck on your new adventures :)
Cheers,
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
that because of the
vendorized `urllib3` package.
Cheers,
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
...@ubuntu.com
jamesp...@debian.org
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
/ due dates?
Thanks,
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
but it definitely doesn't answer your
questions. I'm sure we had this documented way better but I can't find
the link. :(
[0]
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Zaqar/Frequently_asked_questions#How_does_Zaqar_compare_to_AWS_.28SQS.2FSNS.29.3F
Hope the above helps,
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
filed that?
I agree it should not explode. That seems bad. I'll repeat Sean's
question: Has anyone filed that? Otherwise, I think I'll go ahead and
create a bug for it.
Thanks,
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
On 09/18/2014 04:09 PM, Gordon Sim wrote:
On 09/18/2014 12:31 PM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
On 09/17/2014 10:36 PM, Joe Gordon wrote:
My understanding of Zaqar is that it's like SQS. SQS uses distributed
queues, which have a few unusual properties [0]:
Message Order
Amazon SQS makes
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http
On 09/18/2014 04:16 PM, Kapil Thangavelu wrote:
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 4:18 AM, Flavio Percoco fla...@redhat.com
mailto:fla...@redhat.com wrote:
On 09/17/2014 04:34 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
This thread [1] has turned more “future focused, so I’m moving the
conversation
On 09/18/2014 05:42 PM, Steve Lewis wrote:
On September 18, 2014 7:45 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
On 09/18/2014 04:09 PM, Gordon Sim wrote:
However, as far as consuming messages is concerned, it can
guarantee once-and-only-once and/or at-least-once delivery depending on
the message pattern
On 09/18/2014 09:25 PM, Gordon Sim wrote:
On 09/18/2014 03:45 PM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
On 09/18/2014 04:09 PM, Gordon Sim wrote:
Is the replication synchronous or asynchronous with respect to client
calls? E.g. will the response to a post of messages be returned only
once the replication
On 09/18/2014 07:19 PM, Joe Gordon wrote:
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 7:45 AM, Flavio Percoco fla...@redhat.com
mailto:fla...@redhat.com wrote:
On 09/18/2014 04:09 PM, Gordon Sim wrote:
On 09/18/2014 12:31 PM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
On 09/17/2014 10:36 PM, Joe Gordon wrote
On 09/18/2014 07:16 PM, Devananda van der Veen wrote:
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 8:54 AM, Devananda van der Veen
devananda@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 7:45 AM, Flavio Percoco fla...@redhat.com wrote:
On 09/18/2014 04:09 PM, Gordon Sim wrote:
On 09/18/2014 12:31 PM, Flavio
that
far to say there's a need to start over.
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
On 09/18/2014 11:51 AM, Angus Salkeld wrote:
On 18/09/2014 7:11 PM, Flavio Percoco fla...@redhat.com
mailto:fla...@redhat.com wrote:
Greetings,
If I recall correctly, Heat was planning to adopt Zaqar regardless of
the result of the graduation attempt (please correct me if I'm wrong
for the project, team and the rest of the
ecosystem.
Thanks for reading,
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
technically possible, I'm saying
these 2 projects have different goals, visions and scope, hence they
weren't merged nor they will.
Cheers,
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http
On 09/22/2014 11:04 AM, Gordon Sim wrote:
On 09/22/2014 08:00 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
oslo messaging is highly tight to AMQP semantics whereas Zaqar is not.
The API for oslo.messaging is actually quite high level and could easily
be mapped to different messaging technologies
On 09/22/2014 02:35 PM, Gordon Sim wrote:
On 09/22/2014 10:56 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
What I meant is that oslo.messaging is an rpc library and it depends on
few very specific message delivery patterns that are somehow tight/based
on AMQP semantics.
RPC at it's core is the request
on recovering them.
[0] https://bugs.launchpad.net/zaqar/+bug/1372335
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2013-April/007650.html
Cheers,
Flavio
P.S: again, sorry for all the late and mixed replies, email disaster
happened and I'm working on recovering it.
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
___
OpenStack-dev mailing
agree that if FIFO's reality in Zaqar changes, it'll likely
be towards the option (1).
Thanks for your feedback,
Flavio
Thanks,
Kevin
From: Flavio Percoco [fla...@redhat.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2014 5:58 AM
To: openstack-dev
of the highlights of the project for me.
Thanks for all your hard work, Mark. You did a great job and I hope
you'll still be around.
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http
+1
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
it.
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
On 09/24/2014 12:06 AM, Joe Gordon wrote:
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 2:40 AM, Flavio Percoco fla...@redhat.com
mailto:fla...@redhat.com wrote:
On 09/23/2014 05:13 AM, Clint Byrum wrote:
Excerpts from Joe Gordon's message of 2014-09-22 19:04:03 -0700:
[snip
On 09/24/2014 07:07 PM, Clint Byrum wrote:
Sorry for the vague subject[1]. I just wanted to commend Flavio Percoco
and the Zaqar team for maintaining poise and being excellent citizens
of OpenStack whilst being questioned intensely by the likes of me,
and others.
And I'd personally like
is the highest law. -- Cicero
GPG Key fingerprint: 125F 5C67 DFE9 4084
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgpc1OiyWfCmu.pgp
On 10/12/13 12:15 +, Gordon Sim wrote:
On 12/09/2013 11:29 PM, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
On Mon, 2013-12-09 at 16:05 +0100, Flavio Percoco wrote:
Sounds sane to me.
To put it another way, assuming all AMQP 1.0 client libraries are equal,
all the operator cares about is that we have a driver
On 11/12/13 09:31 -0500, Andrew Laski wrote:
On 12/10/13 at 11:09am, Flavio Percoco wrote:
On 09/12/13 17:37 -0500, Russell Bryant wrote:
On 12/09/2013 05:16 PM, Gordon Sim wrote:
On 12/09/2013 07:15 PM, Russell Bryant wrote:
[...]
One other pattern that can benefit from intermediated
, mark all as read.
I'm pretty sure you can do this with most of the known email clients
out there. FWIW, I'm using mutt+offlineimap+notmuch
Cheers,
FF
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgpfR90Utq2wt.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
completely wrong about what a program is / should be, I'm
leaning towards -1.
* I'm sorry, I couldn't come up with a better term for this. :)
Cheers,
FF
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgp7UZvRUQkcr.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
On 13/12/13 10:44 -0500, Russell Bryant wrote:
On 12/13/2013 10:37 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
On 13/12/13 15:53 +0100, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Hi everyone,
TL;DR: Incubation is getting harder, why not ask efforts to apply
for a new program first to get the visibility they need to grow.
Long
On 13/12/13 16:37 +0100, Flavio Percoco wrote:
On 13/12/13 15:53 +0100, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Hi everyone,
TL;DR:
Incubation is getting harder, why not ask efforts to apply for a new
program first to get the visibility they need to grow.
Long version:
Last cycle we introduced the concept
://blueprints.launchpad.net/oslo.messaging/+spec/amqp10-driver-implementation
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgpC9dVaHQWAk.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman
a measured and obvious progression for OpenStack as a whole
sound?
+1
Cheers,
FF
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgpIGHvRb2pnl.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org
On 16/12/13 10:37 +, Gordon Sim wrote:
On 12/12/2013 02:14 PM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
I've a draft in my head of how the amqp 1.0 driver could be
implemented and how to map the current expectations of the messaging
layer to the new protocol.
I think a separate thread to discuss this mapping
On 17/12/13 11:54 +0100, Jaromir Coufal wrote:
On 2013/16/12 15:19, Flavio Percoco wrote:
1. Programs that are not part of OpenStack's release cycle shouldn't
be considered official nor they should have the rights that integrated
projects have.
I don't agree on this point. There might
. Lets also - as Mark
suggested - use that place to add comments and help them grow.
And I'm also in favor of having a emerging projects track. +1
Cheers,
FF
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgpdDFeX8C356.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
OpenStack-dev
On 17/12/13 14:22 +, Gordon Sim wrote:
On 12/17/2013 01:53 PM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
On 16/12/13 10:37 +, Gordon Sim wrote:
On 12/12/2013 02:14 PM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
I've a draft in my head of how the amqp 1.0 driver could be
implemented and how to map the current expectations
towards (3) at the moment. Thoughts ?
--
Thierry Carrez (ttx)
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgp1SYfXAXnZd.pgp
milestones.
Also, incubated projects can ask for reviews / support at anytime.
Cheers,
FF
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgp80J9z8s_ZD.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgpbi1gy9OB8q.pgp
Description: PGP signature
1 - 100 of 1094 matches
Mail list logo
