Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo.db]A proposal for DB read/write separation

2014-08-10 Thread Li Ma
Thanks for all the detailed analysis, Mike W, Mike B, and Roman. For a production-ready database system, replication is a must I think. So, the questions are which replication mode is suitable for OpenStack and which way is suitable for OpenStack to improve performance and scalability of DB acc

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo.db]A proposal for DB read/write separation

2014-08-10 Thread Li Ma
master_connection = master_connection = ... slave_connection = slave_connection = ... HOWEVER, I think it needs more investigation, so this is why I'd like to put it in the mailing list in the early stage to raise some discussions in depth. I'm not a Galera expert. I reall

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack] [Neutron] auto configration of local_ip

2014-01-16 Thread Li Ma
2014/1/16 NOTSU Arata : > The question is, what criteria is appropriate for the purpose. The criteria > being mentioned so far in the review are: > > 1. assigned to the interface attached to default gateway > 2. being in the specified network (CIDR) > 3. assigned to the specified interface >(1

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [stable/havana] cherry backport, multiple external networks, passing tests

2014-02-17 Thread Li Ma
7;s possible. > > > Best regards, > Miguel Ángel > > > ___ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev -- cheers, Li Ma ___

Re: [openstack-dev] Zero MQ remove central broker. Architecture change.

2014-11-18 Thread Li Ma
On 2014/11/19 1:49, Eric Windisch wrote: I think for this cycle we really do need to focus on consolidating and testing the existing driver design and fixing up the biggest deficiency (1) before we consider moving forward with lots of new +1 1) Outbound messaging connection r

Re: [openstack-dev] Zero MQ remove central broker. Architecture change.

2014-11-19 Thread Li Ma
Hi Yatin, Thanks for sharing your presentation. That looks great. Welcome to contribute to ZeroMQ driver. Cheers, Li Ma On 2014/11/19 12:50, yatin kumbhare wrote: Hello Folks, Couple of slides/diagrams, I documented it for my understanding way back for havana release. Particularly slide

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo.messaging] ZeroMQ driver maintenance next steps

2014-12-08 Thread Li Ma
with ZeroMQ. The general sections may be [Why ZeroMQ], [Current Bugs & Reviews], [Future Plan & Blueprints], [Discussions], [Resources], etc. Any comments? [1] https://blueprints.launchpad.net/devstack/+spec/zeromq cheers, Li Ma On 2014/11/18 21:46, James Page wrote: -BEGIN PGP S

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo.messaging][devstack] ZeroMQ driver maintenance next steps

2014-12-10 Thread Li Ma
On 2014/12/9 22:07, Doug Hellmann wrote: On Dec 8, 2014, at 11:25 PM, Li Ma wrote: Hi all, I tried to deploy zeromq by devstack and it definitely failed with lots of problems, like dependencies, topics, matchmaker setup, etc. I've already registered a blueprint for devstack-zeromq [1

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo.messaging][devstack] ZeroMQ driver maintenance next steps

2014-12-19 Thread Li Ma
On 2014/12/9 22:07, Doug Hellmann wrote: On Dec 8, 2014, at 11:25 PM, Li Ma wrote: Hi all, I tried to deploy zeromq by devstack and it definitely failed with lots of problems, like dependencies, topics, matchmaker setup, etc. I've already registered a blueprint for devstack-zeromq [1

[openstack-dev] how to extend port capability using binding:profile

2014-03-16 Thread Li Ma
Hi all, I'd like to extend port capability using ML2 binding:profile. I checked the official docs and it seems that there's no guide for it. Is there any CLI support for port binding:profile? Or is there any development guide on how to set up "profile"? -

[openstack-dev] [Neutron] _notify_port_updated in ML2 plugin doesn't take effect under some conditions

2014-03-17 Thread Li Ma
nd segment here to prevent sending port_update out? In my situation, I run a devstack environment and the bound segment is None by default. Actually, I need this message to be sent out in any situations. I'd appreciate any hints. Thanks a lot, -- --- cheers, Li Ma _

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] _notify_port_updated in ML2 plugin doesn't take effect under some conditions

2014-03-17 Thread Li Ma
Misunderstanding. Just find out this message is sent to notifications.info topic. Anyway, is there any solution to get port_update_info from l2-agents? Thanks, Li Ma On 3/17/2014 4:11 PM, Li Ma wrote: > Hi stackers, > > I'm trying to extend the capability of port

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] _notify_port_updated in ML2 plugin doesn't take effect under some conditions

2014-03-17 Thread Li Ma
Updated. I commented out the segment checking in _notify_port_updated of ml2-plugin, and finally I can get port_update message on l2-agents. Is there any side effect? It is working for me, but I'm not sure it is the "real" solution. thanks, --

Re: [openstack-dev] icehouse-3 release cross reference is added into www.xrefs.info

2014-03-17 Thread Li Ma
ists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev -- --- cheers, Li Ma ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] zeromq work for kilo

2014-09-20 Thread Li Ma
could at least invoke action by the driver team: https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/4ce3f55d169290015063131134f93fca236807ed/nova/tests/virt/test_ironic_api_contracts.py Yes, it is necessary to make API consistent. Cheers, Li Ma ___ OpenStack-d

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] zeromq work for kilo

2014-10-11 Thread Li Ma
deployment guide of ZeroMQ for oslo.messaging, which is located at https://github.com/li-ma/zmq-for-oslo Do I need to issue a bug or propose a blueprint to trace and merge it to oslo.messaging doc tree? 3) an analysis of what it would take to be able to run functional tests for zeromq on our CI

Re: [openstack-dev] Query regarding vRouters & Openstack

2014-11-16 Thread Li Ma
ny routing stack, like quagga or bird. I've tested the second method. It works pretty well. [1] https://github.com/openstack/neutron/tree/master/neutron/services/l3_router/brocade [2] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2014-October/049150.html cheers, Li Ma On 2014/11/1

Re: [openstack-dev] Zero MQ remove central broker. Architecture change.

2014-11-18 Thread Li Ma
L reliable than REQ/REP. Do you have some idea or concern to improve the reliability of the current model? cheers, Li Ma ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] Zero MQ remove central broker. Architecture change.

2014-11-18 Thread Li Ma
On 2014/11/17 22:26, Russell Bryant wrote: On 11/17/2014 05:44 AM, Ilya Pekelny wrote: Hi, all! We want to discuss opportunity of implementation of the p-2-p messaging model in oslo.messaging for ZeroMQ driver. On a related note, have you looked into AMQP 1.0 at all? I have been hopeful about

Re: [openstack-dev] Zero MQ remove central broker. Architecture change.

2014-11-18 Thread Li Ma
, we'd first initialize CI for ZeroMQ. After that, we can work together on how to improve performance, reliability and scalability of ZeroMQ driver. cheers, Li Ma ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.o

[openstack-dev] [Neutron ML2] Potential DB lock when developing new mechanism driver

2014-06-24 Thread Li Ma
it in order to make precommit and postcommit out of the db transaction? I think it is perfect for those who develop mechanism driver and do not know well about the functioning context of the whole ML2 plugin. Thanks, Li Ma ___ OpenStack-dev mailing lis

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron ML2] Potential DB lock when developing new mechanism driver

2014-06-25 Thread Li Ma
ck wait exception is still thrown. Li Ma - Original Message - From: "Kevin Benton" To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" Sent: 星期三, 2014年 6 月 25日 下午 4:59:26 Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron ML2] Potential DB lock when developing

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron ML2] Potential DB lock when developing new mechanism driver

2014-06-25 Thread Li Ma
(%s, %s, %s, %s, %s, %s, %s, %s)' (...) It seems that the transaction in the postcommit cannot be committed. Thanks a lot, Li Ma - Original Message - From: "Li Ma" To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" Sent: 星期三, 2014年 6 月 25日 下午 6:21

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron ML2] Potential DB lock when developing new mechanism driver

2014-06-25 Thread Li Ma
ed; try restarting transaction') 'INSERT INTO ml2_port_bindings (port_id, host, vnic_type, profile, vif_type, vif_details, driver, segment) VALUES (%s, %s, %s, %s, %s, %s, %s, %s)' ('2f7996c2-7a60-4334-a71d-11e82285e272', '', 'normal', "{'type&

[openstack-dev] [Neutron] port-forwarding for router

2014-07-17 Thread Li Ma
very important for operators and end-users. [1] https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/router-port-forwarding [2] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/60512/ Thanks, Li Ma ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] port-forwarding for router

2014-07-18 Thread Li Ma
I'd like to using iptables for port-forwarding, because it is simple and straightforward. I didn't notice the Tap-as-a-Service before, and it seems interesting. Thanks, Li Ma - Original Message - From: "Baohua Yang" To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List

[openstack-dev] [oslo.db]A proposal for DB read/write separation

2014-08-07 Thread Li Ma
ion method for oslo.db that every project may happily takes advantage of it without any code modification. Moreover, I'd like to put it in the mailing list in advance to make sure it is acceptable for oslo.db. I'd appreciate any

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][taas] proposal: dedicated tunnel for carrying mirrored traffic

2015-11-18 Thread Li Ma
f > > Best Regards, > Soichi Shigeta > > > > __ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack

[openstack-dev] [networking-bagpipe] how to deploy devstack with bgpvpn and bagpipe driver

2016-06-15 Thread Li Ma
tiple nodes. Best regards, -- Li Ma (Nick) Email: skywalker.n...@gmail.com __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe

[openstack-dev] [midonet] NetlinkInterfaceSensor timeout causes failure of networking

2016-06-22 Thread Li Ma
d you guys provide some hints on the logic about it and how to get rid of it? I just guess it is not a bug, maybe some configuration tuning. When I went through the codes, I couldn't find the problems. Thanks a lot, -- Li Ma (Nick) Email: skywalker

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] dvr with ovs-dpdk.

2016-05-09 Thread Li Ma
Hi Sean I'm very interested in this topic, but I missed the discussion during summit. AFAIK, when deploying OVS-dpdk, it seems transparent to DVR. The only thing we need to do is to switch from OVS firewall-driver to OVS-dpdk-firewall-driver. Do you have any outputs about the integration? Is ther

Re: [openstack-dev] [MidoNet] Fwd: [MidoNet-Dev] Sync virtual topology data from neutron DB to Zookeeper?

2015-12-16 Thread Li Ma
x27;t support syncing the full Neutron DB, there has >> been work done for this that would allow this use case, but it's still >> not complete or released. >> >> @Ryu may be able to provide recommendations to do this following a >> manual process. >> >> Ch

[openstack-dev] [midonet] ping cannot work from VM to external gateway IP.

2015-12-16 Thread Li Ma
27;m in the business trip that cannot touch the environment. So, I'd like to get some ideas first and then I can tell my partners to work on it.) Thanks a lot, -- Li Ma (Nick) Email: skywalker.n...@gmail.com __ Open

Re: [openstack-dev] [midonet] ping cannot work from VM to external gateway IP.

2015-12-16 Thread Li Ma
Updated: Lots of ARP requests from external physical router to VM are catched on the physical NIC binded to provider router port. It seems that external physical router doesn't get answers to these ARP requests. On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 8:08 PM, Li Ma wrote: > Hi Midoers, > > I h

[openstack-dev] [midonet] how to configure static route for uplink

2015-12-16 Thread Li Ma
if I just bind router0:port0 to physical nic: eth0, and don't do the uplink bridge and veth pair stuff. Can it work? [1] https://docs.midonet.org/docs/v2015.06/en/operations-guide/content/static_setup.html -- Li Ma (Nick) Email: skyw

[openstack-dev] [Neutron] [Dragonflow] Support configuration of DB clusters

2015-12-25 Thread Li Ma
ip2:port', 'ip3:port'] list in the configuration file. If only one server exists, just set it to ['ip1:port']. Any suggestions? -- Li Ma (Nick) Email: skywalker.n...@gmail.com __ OpenStack Deve

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] [Dragonflow] Support configuration of DB clusters

2015-12-27 Thread Li Ma
! > > > At 2015-12-25 19:07:10, "Li Ma" wrote: >>Hi all, currently, we only support db_ip and db_port in the >>configuration file. Some DB SDK supports clustering, like Zookeeper. >>You can specify a list of nodes when client application starts to >>conn

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] [Dragonflow] Support configuration of DB clusters

2015-12-28 Thread Li Ma
Thanks for your suggestion, Gal. On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 8:04 PM, Gal Sagie wrote: > Hi Li Ma, > > I think its a good idea. > I suggest for first stage, pass the CONF as optional parameter in addition > to the db_ip and db_port. > This way you will have minimum code chan

[openstack-dev] [Neutron] [Dragonflow] Atomic update doesn't work with etcd-driver

2015-12-28 Thread Li Ma
Hi Gal, you reverted this patch [1] due to the broken pipeline. Could you provide some debug information or detailed description? When I run my devstack, I cannot reproduce the sync problem. [1] https://github.com/openstack/dragonflow/commit/f83dd5795d54e1a70b8bdec1e6dd9f7815eb6546 -- Li Ma

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][binding:host_id] Binding:host_id changes when creating vm.

2015-07-27 Thread Li Ma
>> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >> > > __ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstac

[openstack-dev] [neutron][nova] some conflicts in bridge-mapping in linuxbridge

2015-07-30 Thread Li Ma
which bridge to use. (2) Let Neutron decide interface name (tap-xxx) and bridge name (brq-xxx), not Nova. As a result, when creating port, Neutron return interface name and bridge name to Nova, so Nova has the right device name to process. This helps Nova get rid of hard-code, but need lots

[openstack-dev] [dragonflow] Low OVS version for Ubuntu

2015-09-16 Thread Li Ma
? Thanks, -- Li Ma (Nick) Email: skywalker.n...@gmail.com __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] RFE process question

2015-09-17 Thread Li Ma
A reasonable user story. Other than tag, a common description field for Neutron resources is also usable. I submitted a RFE bug for review: https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1496705 __ OpenStack Development Mailing List

[openstack-dev] [neutron] Please help review this RFE

2015-09-17 Thread Li Ma
r thoughts. -- Li Ma (Nick) Email: skywalker.n...@gmail.com __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-b

Re: [openstack-dev] [dragonflow] Low OVS version for Ubuntu

2015-09-17 Thread Li Ma
t; certain features in Neutron (For example, the OVS ARP responder). > > On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 4:17 AM, Gal Sagie wrote: >> >> Hello Li Ma, >> >> Dragonflow uses OpenFlow1.3 to communicate with OVS and thats why we need >> OVS 2.3.1. >> As suggested you c

[openstack-dev] [neutron] [oslo.privsep] Any progress on privsep?

2015-09-17 Thread Li Ma
in the Liberty cycle. I just wonder how it is going on. [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1492714 Thanks a lot, -- Li Ma (Nick) Email: skywalker.n...@gmail.com __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [oslo.privsep] Any progress on privsep?

2015-09-18 Thread Li Ma
Thanks for your reply, Gus. That's awesome. I'd like to have a look at it or test if possible. Any source code available in the upstream? On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 12:40 PM, Angus Lees wrote: > On Fri, 18 Sep 2015 at 14:13 Li Ma wrote: >> >> Hi stackers, >> >

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Neutron debugging tool

2015-09-20 Thread Li Ma
- Nodir > > [1] > http://docs.openstack.org/cli-reference/content/neutron-debug_commands.html > > __ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe >

[openstack-dev] [dragonflow] db consistency progress

2016-02-24 Thread Li Ma
here. Any thoughts? Thanks a lot. -- Li Ma (Nick) Email: skywalker.n...@gmail.com __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe

Re: [openstack-dev] [dragonflow]Part of the OpenStack Big-tent

2016-02-24 Thread Li Ma
Congrats ;-) -- Li Ma (Nick) Email: skywalker.n...@gmail.com __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http

[openstack-dev] [dragonflow] db consistency progress

2016-02-26 Thread Li Ma
2016年2月24日星期三,Gal Sagie > 写道: > Hi Li Ma, > > Great job on this! > > I think Rally is the correct way to test something like that, what you > could use to check the end to end > solution is try to restart the DF DB server for timeouts during API > configurations. &

[openstack-dev] [dragonflow] question about the schedule during design summit

2016-03-27 Thread Li Ma
Hi all, I will have a tight schedule during design summit. I'd like to know about the arrangement in Apr 28-29. So, I can try to re-schedule to fit for the arrangement if needed. Thanks, -- Li Ma (Nick) Email: skywalker.n...@gmai

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo.messaging][zmq] Redundant zmq.Context creation

2015-02-04 Thread Li Ma
equ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > > > ______ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: opens

Re: [openstack-dev] ZeroMQ topic object.

2015-02-04 Thread Li Ma
Thanks! > > ___ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > -- Li Ma (Nick) Email: skywalker.n...@gmail.com

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][messaging][zmq] Discussion on zmq driver design issues

2015-03-05 Thread Li Ma
lcome to update it [4]. [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/152471/ [2] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/155673/ [3] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/130943/ [4] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/ZeroMQ Thanks a lot, Li Ma (Nick)

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][messaging][zmq] Discussion on zmq driver design issues

2015-03-21 Thread Li Ma
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 8:14 PM, ozamiatin wrote: > Hi Li Ma, > > Thank you very much for your reply > > It's good to hear you have a living deployment with zmq driver. > Is there a big divergence between your production and upstream versions > of the driver? Besides [

[openstack-dev] [oslo.messaging][zeromq] 'Subgroup' for broker-less ZeroMQ driver

2015-03-23 Thread Li Ma
. Actually I'm not sure whether it is suitable to call it a 'subgroup'. Besides, if it is possible, we need to figure out the suitable meeting time and irc channel. Please give advice. Best regards, -- Li Ma (Nick) Email: skywalker

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo.messaging][zeromq] 'Subgroup' for broker-less ZeroMQ driver

2015-03-24 Thread Li Ma
ixed online meeting for zmq driver. -- Li Ma (Nick) Email: skywalker.n...@gmail.com __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe htt

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo.messaging][zeromq] 'Subgroup' for broker-less ZeroMQ driver

2015-03-24 Thread Li Ma
>> As for me, I like the idea of separate repo for zmq driver because it >> gives more freedom for driver extension. >> There are some ideas that we can have more than a single zmq driver >> implementation in future. >> At least we may have different versions one for HA a

[openstack-dev] [oslo.messaging][zeromq] introduce Request-Reply pattern to improve the stability

2015-03-29 Thread Li Ma
in my lab, and it works well. I know there's another blueprint for REP/REQ pattern [1], but it's not the same, I think. I'd like to discuss it about how to take advantage of REP/REQ of zeromq. [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/154094/2/specs/kilo/zmq-req-rep-call.rst Best regar

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo.messaging][zeromq] introduce Request-Reply pattern to improve the stability

2015-04-01 Thread Li Ma
nicely matches for CALL. > However CAST can also be implemented over REQ/REP, using > reply as message delivery acknowledgement, but not returning it to caller. > Listening to reply for CAST in background thread keeps it async as well. > > Regards, > Oleksii Zamiatin > > > On 3

[openstack-dev] [oslo.messaging][zeromq] Some backports to stable/kilo

2015-04-09 Thread Li Ma
enstack.org/172062 [4] https://review.openstack.org/172063 Best regards, -- Li Ma (Nick) Email: skywalker.n...@gmail.com __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: opensta

Re: [openstack-dev] [release] oslo.messaging 1.9.0

2015-04-09 Thread Li Ma
ts.txt b/test-requirements.txt > index 0b2a583..5afaa74 100644 > --- a/test-requirements.txt > +++ b/test-requirements.txt > @@ -16 +16 @@ testtools>=0.9.36,!=1.2.0 > -oslotest>=1.2.0 # Apache-2.0 > +oslotest>=1.5.1,<1.6.0 # Apache-2.0 > @@ -34 +34 @@ sphinx>=1.1.2,!=

Re: [openstack-dev] [release] oslo.messaging 1.9.0

2015-04-09 Thread Li Ma
https://review.openstack.org/172045 On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 9:21 PM, Li Ma wrote: > Hi Doug, > > In the global requirements.txt, oslo.messaging version is still >= > 1.8.0 but < 1.9.0. As a result, some bugs fixed in 1.9.0 are still > there when I deploy with devstack

Re: [openstack-dev] [release] oslo.messaging 1.9.0

2015-04-09 Thread Li Ma
it a/test-requirements-py3.txt b/test-requirements-py3.txt >> > index 937c9f2..f137195 100644 >> > --- a/test-requirements-py3.txt >> > +++ b/test-requirements-py3.txt >> > @@ -16 +16 @@ testtools>=0.9.36,!=1.2.0 >> > -oslotest>=1.2.0 # Apache-2.0 &

Re: [openstack-dev] [FaaS] Introduce a FaaS project

2017-05-14 Thread Li Ma
github.com/openstack/picasso > [3]: https://github.com/openwhisk/openwhisk > > Cheers, > Lingxian Kong (Larry) > > ______ > Open

[openstack-dev] [dragonflow] The failure of fullstack tests

2016-07-24 Thread Li Ma
ck/dragonflow/blob/master/dragonflow/tests/common/app_testing_objects.py -- Li Ma (Nick) Email: skywalker.n...@gmail.com __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-re

Re: [openstack-dev] 回复: [neutron]dragonflow deployment incorrectness

2016-08-02 Thread Li Ma
00,reg7=0x17 actions=output:19 > cookie=0x0, duration=1710.877s, table=78, n_packets=0, n_bytes=0, > idle_age=1710, priority=100,reg7=0x15 actions=output:13 > cookie=0x0, duration=1710.876s, table=78, n_packets=0, n_bytes=0, > idle_age=1710, priority=100,reg7=0x1a actions=output:15 >

Re: [openstack-dev] [Kuryr][Dragonflow] - PTL Non Candacy

2016-09-12 Thread Li Ma
t (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > -- Li Ma (Nick) Email: skywalker.n...@gmail.com _

Re: [openstack-dev] 退出邮件列表

2014-04-21 Thread Li Ma (Nick)
Hi xueyan, You can do it by yourself via the following link: http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev Li Ma - Original Message - From: "l" To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Sent: 星期一, 2014年 4 月 21日 上午 10:56:08 Subject: [openstack-dev] 退出邮件列表 您