Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] about use nfs driver to backup the volume snapshot

2018-11-01 Thread Jay Bryant
On Thu, Nov 1, 2018, 10:44 AM Rambo wrote: > Hi,all > > Recently, I use the nfs driver as the cinder-backup backend, when I > use it to backup the volume snapshot, the result is return the > NotImplementedError[1].And the doesn't has the > create_volume_from_snapshot function. Does

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack] Cinder volume Troubleshoot

2018-07-01 Thread Jay Bryant
Kevin, Just a note thatyou may need to look way back in the logs to find the cause as there m as y be many periodic job failures filling the logs. Jay On Sun, Jul 1, 2018, 7:09 AM Ivan Kolodyazhny wrote: > Hi Kevin, > > Do you have any errors or tracebacks in

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] making volume available without stopping VM

2018-06-23 Thread Jay Bryant
On Sat, Jun 23, 2018, 9:39 AM Volodymyr Litovka wrote: > Dear friends, > > I did some tests with making volume available without stopping VM. I'm > using CEPH and these steps produce the following results: > > 1) openstack volume set --state available [UUID] > - nothing changed inside both VM

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] increasing the number of allowed volumes attached per instance > 26

2018-06-07 Thread Jay Bryant
On Thu, Jun 7, 2018, 4:17 PM Matt Riedemann wrote: > On 6/7/2018 1:54 PM, Jay Pipes wrote: > > > > If Cinder tracks volume attachments as consumable resources, then this > > would be my preference. > > Cinder does: > > > >

[openstack-dev] [Cinder] no meeting today

2018-05-23 Thread Jay Bryant
Just a reminder there is no meeting because ofthe summit today. Jay __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe:

Re: [openstack-dev] Adding "not docs" banner to specs website?

2018-03-19 Thread Jay Bryant
Agree this is a good idea. Let me know what we can do to help. Jay On Mon, Mar 19, 2018, 9:58 AM Jim Rollenhagen wrote: > Ironic (and surely other projects) have had to point out many times that > specs are a point in time design discussion, and not completed >

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Switching to longer development cycles

2017-12-17 Thread Jay Bryant
On Wed, Dec 13, 2017, 4:20 PM Thierry Carrez wrote: > Ed Leafe wrote: > > On Dec 13, 2017, at 12:13 PM, Tim Bell wrote: > > > >> There is a risk that deployment to production is delayed, and therefore > feedback is delayed and the wait for the ‘initial

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][cinder] Nova is now using the Cinder volume attachments API - multiattach comes next

2017-12-17 Thread Jay Bryant
a good chance > to get multi-attach support into Nova in Queens. > > > > We have a plan for multi-attach support [3] which I think is doable > before feature freeze. The Cinder 3.48 API is now available too which Nova > needs to correctly detach a multi-attach volume. > &g

Re: [openstack-dev] [First Contact] [SIG] Presence at the PTG

2017-12-14 Thread Jay Bryant
Sounds like a good plan. Hopefully we can do some OUI work face to face as well? Jay On Thu, Dec 14, 2017, 2:55 PM Kendall Nelson wrote: > Hello, > > It came up in a discussion today that it might be good to get together and > discuss all the activities around on

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Dublin PTG format

2017-11-27 Thread Jay Bryant
Thierry, I have been happy with the current 2 day/3 day split. I am concerned that I would have a harder time getting focus from the project team splitting across multiple half days. That is just my hunch. Jay On Mon, Nov 27, 2017, 1:21 PM Doug Hellmann wrote: >

[openstack-dev] [Cinder] No meeting this week

2017-11-01 Thread Jay Bryant
Just a reminder that we do not have a meeting this week as a number of people will be traveling. See you in Sydney! Jay __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe:

[openstack-dev] [cinder] Denver Team Dinner Planned ...

2017-09-08 Thread Jay Bryant
Team, I have found a place that I hope we will all enjoy for dinner. The general consensus was to do Thursday night with a few exceptions.  So, I went with the majority and made reservations for Thursday night at 7 pm.  Here are the details: * */Location:  Casey's Bistro and Pub - 7301

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][docs] 404s on docs website after the great reorg

2017-07-27 Thread Jay Bryant
I think that making it so we can do redirect is good. The current blackhole approach is less than desirable. Jay On 7/27/2017 10:06 PM, ChangBo Guo wrote: ++ for the solution. 2017-07-28 2:24 GMT+08:00 Doug Hellmann >: Excerpts

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][tc] Moving away from "big tent" terminology

2017-06-17 Thread Jay Bryant
On Thu, Jun 15, 2017, 10:45 AM Tim Bell wrote: > OpenStack Nucleus and OpenStack Electrons? > > Tim > > -Original Message- > From: Thierry Carrez > Organization: OpenStack > Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] Target classes in Cinder

2017-06-02 Thread Jay Bryant
I had forgotten that we added this and am guessing that other cores did as well. As a result, it likely, was not enforced in driver reviews. I need to better understand the benefit. In don't think there is a hurry to remove this right now. Can we put it on the agenda for Denver? Jay On Fri, Jun

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Supporting volume_type when booting from volume

2017-05-23 Thread Jay Bryant
On 5/23/2017 9:56 AM, Duncan Thomas wrote: On 23 May 2017 4:51 am, "Matt Riedemann" > wrote: Is this really something we are going to have to deny at least once per release? My God how is it that this is the #1 thing everyone

Re: [openstack-dev] [ptg] How to slice the week to minimize conflicts

2017-05-23 Thread Jay Bryant
I had expected more cinder/nova sessions the first days, so I like that proposal. If we are able to minimize project overlap or have alternatives the last 3 days I think we are moving towards a better solution. Jay On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 9:18 AM Thierry Carrez wrote: >

Re: [openstack-dev] [ptg] ptgbot: how to make "what's currently happening" emerge

2017-05-20 Thread Jay Bryant
On 5/18/2017 4:57 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: Hi again, For the PTG events we have, by design, a pretty loose schedule. Each room is free to organize their agenda in whatever way they see fit, and take breaks whenever they need. This flexibility is key to keep our productivity at those events

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] [Nova] Extend attached volume

2017-04-01 Thread Jay Bryant
On 4/1/2017 4:07 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: On 4/1/2017 12:17 PM, Jay Bryant wrote: Matt, I think discussion on this goes all the way back to Tokyo. There was work on the Cinder side to send the notification to Nova which I believe all the pieces were in place for. The missing part (sticking

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] [Nova] Extend attached volume

2017-04-01 Thread Jay Bryant
Matt, I think discussion on this goes all the way back to Tokyo. There was work on the Cinder side to send the notification to Nova which I believe all the pieces were in place for. The missing part (sticking point) was doing a rescan of the SCSI bus in the node that had the extended volume

Re: [openstack-dev] [ptls] Project On-Boarding Rooms

2017-03-16 Thread Jay Bryant
Kendall, Did you end up reserving a room for Cinder or did others need it? Since Sean left it open I wanted to know the status so we could plan appropriately. Thanks! Jay On 3/16/2017 3:03 PM, Kendall Nelson wrote: @James Already have Charms on the list :) @Telles I can put Sahara down

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] PTG Recap

2017-03-04 Thread Jay Bryant
Sean, Thank you for getting this note out! If anyone has comments for improvement of the format, please let me know. Want to continue to improve our access to information and make it easier to leverage that information in the future! Thanks! Jay Bryant (jungleboyj) On 3/3/2017 1:42 PM

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] PTG Recap

2017-03-04 Thread Jay Bryant
lson (diablo_rojo) [1] On Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 1:45 PM Sean McGinnis < <>> wrote: I leiu of a lengthy email that very few will read, this is just a pointer. Jay Bryant

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic] Baremetal Storage Service?

2016-11-13 Thread Jay Bryant
Akira, Cinder has been working on creating a standalone service that could run on bare metal nodes. [1]. I am thinking this could meet your needs or be enhanced to meet your needs. Don't think we want to create a separate service for it. Jay [1]

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][cinder] tag:follows-standard-deprecation should be removed

2016-08-14 Thread Jay Bryant
I agree with Duncan here. Driver removal has been an important tool to keep only maintained drivers in the tree and a way to get attention to ignored drivers. I hate to see the tag removed but think we need to stay true to the approach we have been taking. Re-addressing the meaning of the tag

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] [cinder] [nova] locking concern with os-brick

2016-08-13 Thread Jay Bryant
I have enough experience to know that the notes will not be read. I think we need to pull Walt and Kendall in and come up with a safer solution to this. That is my 2 cents. :-) Jay On Sat, Aug 13, 2016 at 5:07 PM Matt Riedemann wrote: > On 8/12/2016 8:54 AM, Matt

Re: [openstack-dev] How to develop a new [Cinder] driver?

2016-07-17 Thread Jay Bryant
Turbo, First, trying to understand why you are trying to create a new driver for Mitaka. New drivers need to go into the latest release. More information can be found here: Second, there really isn't any other way with Python,

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder][openstackclient] Required name option for volumes, snapshots and backups

2016-04-05 Thread Jay Bryant
he become ambiguous in the future? I doubt there are > many operations or objects that are unique to Cinder - backup, snapshot, > transfer, group, type - these are all very much generic, and even if they > aren't ambiguous now, they might well become so in future... > > On 5 April 2

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder][openstackclient] Required name option for volumes, snapshots and backups

2016-04-05 Thread Jay Bryant
All, Just to document the discussion we had during the OSC IRC meeting last week: I believe the consensus we reached was that it wasn't appropriate to pretend "volume" before all Cinder commands but that it would be appropriate to move in that direction to for any commands that may be ambiguous

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] Let's do presentations/sessions on Mitaka's new complex features in Design Summit

2016-03-14 Thread Jay Bryant
Great idea Gorka! I know I could benefit from this as a reviewer. Thanks for proposing it. Jay On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 3:52 PM Gorka Eguileor wrote: > Hi, > > As you all probably know, during this cycle we have introduced quite a > big number of changes in cinder that

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] Nominating Patrick East to Cinder Core

2016-01-30 Thread Jay Bryant
+1. Patrick's contributions to Cinder have been notable since he joined us and he is a pleasure to work with! Welcome to the core team Patrick! Jay On Fri, Jan 29, 2016, 19:05 Sean McGinnis wrote: > Patrick has been a strong contributor to Cinder over the last few >

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra] Gerrit Upgrade to ver 2.11, completed.

2015-12-22 Thread Jay Bryant
All, Has anyone found a way to do code reviews on an iPad. In the old Gerrit you could. With the new interface attempts to enter comments don't work. It looks like you should be able to enter text but when you type the page just jumps around. Very frustrating. I have tried Safari and Chrome with

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] FFE Request - capacity-headroom

2015-09-03 Thread Jay Bryant
Since Mike is out I wanted to respond to this: I don't think we a re planning to take FFE requests this time around. Also, the core team discussed this particular item and felt that there are still too many open questions on the patch and the patch is too invasive to merge this late in the game.

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][cinder] Extending attached disks

2015-08-22 Thread Jay Bryant
Taylor, I am adding some IBMers who are also looking into making this work. PowerVC has a solution hacked into place but we are working on getting a more general solution implemented for Mitaka. Hoping we can all work together to get a solution in place. Will you be in Tokyo? If so, it would be

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] [Openstack] Rescinding the M name decision

2015-07-11 Thread Jay Bryant
Thierry, Well put, and interesting. I didn't know about the other cultural concerns around numbers. Most importantly, I think using names for releases is better than numbers, creating a more personal connection to each release. Would hate to see that end. Unfortunately there isn't much we can

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] The unbearable lightness of specs

2015-06-29 Thread Jay Bryant
+1. I think this is a good comment for all reviews. I have been frustrated lately with a number of reviews that I spent time upon but didn't feel should be scored. I think that 0 with comments should be counted as well. On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 2:27 PM Tim Bell wrote:

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] Need help from folks working on Dell, Storpool and Infortrend drivers

2015-06-29 Thread Jay Bryant
Vincent, Best place to start is with Sean McGinnis. Jay On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 10:00 PM Sheng Bo Hou wrote: Hi everyone, For folks who are working on Dell, Storpool and Infortrend drivers: I have got a new patch for There is a

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder][stable] Cinder client broken in Juno

2015-06-29 Thread Jay Bryant
I too would prefer option 2. Would rather do the pack ports than remove the functionality. Jay On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 9:40 AM Gorka Eguileor wrote: On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 08:49:55AM -0700, Mike Perez wrote: There was a bug raised [1] from some large deployments that the

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] Some Changes to Cinder Core

2015-05-22 Thread Jay Bryant
+1 Well deserved. Welcome to Core Sean! It is a pleasure to work with you! Thanks to Avishay for all his contributions! Sorry to see you go. Jay On May 22, 2015 4:36 PM, Mike Perez wrote: This is long overdue, but it gives me great pleasure to nominate Sean McGinnis for

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] Deadline For Volume Drivers to Be Readded

2015-03-26 Thread Jay Bryant
Mike, I am communicating this problem with my teams and will get it resolved asap. Jay On Mar 26, 2015 1:23 PM, Mike Perez wrote: On 09:39 Thu 26 Mar , Mike Perez wrote: As discussed in the last Cinder meeting [1], in order to have your volume driver readded into the

Re: [openstack-dev] Cinder Third-Party CI: what next? (was Re: [cinder] Request exemption for removal of NetApp FC drivers (no voting CI))

2015-03-26 Thread Jay Bryant
Mike, This effort has taken quite some time and was going to require hard decisions to be made at some point. You have been more than patient in this process and I commend you for that as well as all the communication. Thank you for continuing to drive this! Jay On Mar 24, 2015 10:55 PM,

Re: [openstack-dev] Deprecation warnings considered harmful?

2015-03-15 Thread Jay Bryant
+2. I think the having checks are helpful. If they aren't removed it does Leelee harm. Jay On Mar 15, 2015 6:39 AM, Duncan Thomas wrote: On 13 March 2015 at 17:36, Doug Hellmann wrote: I wish we, as a community, were less obsessed with creating

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder]Request to to revisit this patch

2015-03-15 Thread Jay Bryant
I agree with Walt that reverting this is the right answer. Please make sure to have your ci running as well for liberty. Jay On Mar 4, 2015 2:30 AM, Zhangni wrote: Hi Mike, Jay, and Walter, Please revisit this patch and don’t

Re: [openstack-dev] auto-abandon changesets considered harmful (was Re: [stable][all] Revisiting the 6 month release cycle [metrics])

2015-03-01 Thread Jay Bryant
+2 I recently had a patch abandoned that had every right to be pulled off the list. It had fallen off my radar and was no longer relevant. As long as there is a way to restore the patch where appropriate, we should do it. Jay I have to agree with John. We have many more submitters than we

Re: [openstack-dev] Ideas about Openstack Cinder for GSOC 2015

2015-02-27 Thread Jay Bryant
Fyi ... This is something that Mike Perez was thinking about so you can ping thingee on irc if you can't find e0ne. Jay On Feb 27, 2015 3:51 AM, harryxiyou wrote: Hi all, I cannot find the proper idea about Openstack Cinder for GSOC 2015 here[1]. Could anyone please

Re: [openstack-dev] Changes to Cinder Core

2015-01-21 Thread Jay Bryant
+1 Ivan had been doing a great job! Will be glad to have him (officially) on the team! Jay On Jan 21, 2015 10:18 AM, Mike Perez wrote: On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 10:14 AM, Mike Perez wrote: It gives me great pleasure to nominate Ivan Kolodyazhny (e0ne) for

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] Cutoff deadlines for cinder drivers

2015-01-20 Thread Jay Bryant
Mike, Thanks for the diligent efforts to get the word out! Jay On Jan 20, 2015 12:30 PM, Mike Perez wrote: On 13:53 Tue 20 Jan , Erlon Cruz wrote: Thanks Deepak! Mike is also sending the announce to the vendors in the mail accounts listed in the CI Status

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Cross-project DevRef Was Re: Skipping Cross-Project meeting today

2015-01-20 Thread Jay Bryant
+2 This topic had come up in Cinder I believe as well. Having a common devref for common content would be good and would make it easier to keep the documentation current. Jay On Jan 20, 2015 4:05 PM, Jay Pipes wrote: On 01/20/2015 01:30 PM, Ian Cordasco wrote: On Jan 20,

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] dropping namespace packages

2015-01-08 Thread Jay Bryant
We talked about this in Cinder. I am planning to create some hacking checks for us just to be safe. Shouldn't take a ton of effort. Jay On Jan 8, 2015 12:03 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: On Jan 8, 2015, at 11:29 AM, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: On

[openstack-dev] Fwd: [Openstack-stable-maint] Stable check of openstack/cinder failed

2015-01-08 Thread Jay Bryant
I have a patch out to resolve this failure: Jay -- Forwarded message -- From: A mailing list for the OpenStack Stable Branch test reports. Date: Jan 8, 2015 1:40 AM Subject: [Openstack-stable-maint]

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable] Proposal to add Flavio Percoco to stable-maint-core

2015-01-08 Thread Jay Bryant
+2. How contributions have always been helpful. On Jan 7, 2015 8:50 AM, Alan Pevec wrote: +2 Flavio knows stable branch policies very well and will be a good addition to the cross-projects stable team. Cheers, Alan ___

[openstack-dev] [cinder] Anyone knows whether there is freezing day of spec approval?

2014-12-17 Thread Jay Bryant
Dave, My apologies. We have not yet set a day that we are freezing BP/Spec approval for Cinder. We had a deadline in November for new drivers being proposed but haven't frozen other proposals yet. I mixed things up with Nova's 12/18 cutoff. Not sure when we will be cutting off BPs for

Re: [openstack-dev] Query regarding BluePrint submission for Review

2014-12-16 Thread Jay Bryant
Vikram, The process is documented here: Let me know if you have questions. Jay On Dec 16, 2014 11:18 PM, Vikram Choudhary wrote: Dear All, We want to submit a new blueprint for review. Can you please provide the

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] Anyone knows whether there is freezing day of spec approval?

2014-12-15 Thread Jay Bryant
Dave, Yes, we are not taking new specs/blueprints after 12/18. Jay On Dec 15, 2014 9:18 PM, Chen, Wei D wrote: Hi, I know nova has such day around Dec. 18, is there a similar day in Cinder project? thanks! Best Regards, Dave Chen

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][cinder][infra] Ceph CI status update

2014-12-14 Thread Jay Bryant
On Saturday, December 13, 2014, Deepak Shetty wrote: I think you completely mis-understood my Q I am completely in agreement for _not_ putting CI status in mailing list. Let me rephrase: As of now, I see 2 places where CI status is being tracked:

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] Request for J3 FFE - add reset-state function for backups

2014-09-11 Thread Jay Bryant
It isn't a huge change. I am ok with it if we can get the issues addressed. Especially Duncan's concern. On Sep 11, 2014 12:17 PM, Mike Perez wrote: On 12:23 Tue 09 Sep , yunling wrote: Hi Cinder Folks,I would like to request a FFE for add reset-state function for

Re: [openstack-dev] Feature freeze + Juno-3 milestone candidates available

2014-09-06 Thread Jay Bryant
an untranslated correct message than a translated incorrect message. :-) - Joe On Sep 5, 2014, at 3:41 PM, Jay Bryant wrote: Matt, I don't think that is the right solution. If the string changes I think the only

[openstack-dev] [Cinder][FFE] make ssh host key policy configurable

2014-09-05 Thread Jay Bryant
Not sure if the patch to make the ssh strict policy setting configurable needed an official ffe. It merged after the tag so I wanted to cover my bases. This is my request. Thanks! Jay ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list

Re: [openstack-dev] Feature freeze + Juno-3 milestone candidates available

2014-09-05 Thread Jay Bryant
Matt, I don't think that is the right solution. If the string changes I think the only problem is it won't be translated if it is thrown. That is better than breaking the coding standard imho. Jay On Sep 5, 2014 3:30 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: On 9/5/2014 5:10

Re: [openstack-dev] [All] LOG.warning/LOG.warn

2014-08-17 Thread Jay Bryant
+2 I prefer the LOG.warning format and support that given the documentation you shared. If there is agreement I would create a hacking check. Jay On Aug 17, 2014 1:28 AM, Gary Kotton wrote: Hi, Over the last few weeks I have seen a number of patches where LOG.warn is

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] recheck no bug and comment

2014-07-25 Thread Jay Bryant
Sean, Thanks for making this change! Jay On Jul 25, 2014 5:41 AM, Sean Dague wrote: On 07/25/2014 01:18 AM, Ian Wienand wrote: On 07/16/2014 11:15 PM, Alexis Lee wrote: What do you think about allowing some text after the words recheck no bug? I think this is a good

Re: [openstack-dev] Mentor program?

2014-07-23 Thread Jay Bryant
Great question Josh! Have been doing a lot of mentoring within IBM for OpenStack and have now been asked to formalize some of that work. Not surprised there is an external need as well. Anne and Stefano. Let me know if the kids anything I can do to help. Jay Hi all, I was reading over a IMHO

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][specs] Please stop doing specs for any changes in projects

2014-07-09 Thread Jay Bryant
I had been under the impression that all BPs we going to require a spec. I, however, was made are in today's cinder meeting that we are only requiring specs for changes that change the user's interaction with the system or are a large change that touches the broader cinder code base. This

Re: [openstack-dev] [hacking] rules for removal

2014-06-22 Thread Jay Bryant
I agree Duncan. I think the commit message is one of the most important parts of a commit. If the message is not useful, the code shouldn't go in. Jay Bryant On Jun 22, 2014 1:51 PM, Duncan Thomas wrote: On 22 June 2014 14:41, Amrith Kumar wrote

Re: [openstack-dev] [Oslo] Translating log and exception messages in Oslo libraries

2014-06-22 Thread Jay Bryant
+1 To translating oslo logs. There is quite a bit of logging that comes out of the libraries. It should be logged for consistency using delayed translation. Jay On Jun 20, 2014 8:22 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote: On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 8:40 AM, Mark McLoughlin

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Dev][Cinder] Review days? (open to ANYBODY and EVERYBODY)

2014-06-12 Thread Jay Bryant
John, +2 I am guilty of falling behind on reviews. Pulled in to a lot of other stuff since the summit ... and before. Having prescribed time on my calendar is a good idea. Just put it on my calendar. Jay On Jun 12, 2014 10:49 PM, John Griffith wrote: Hey