On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 7:44 AM, Christopher Yeoh wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Oct 2014 09:45:44 -0400
> Jay Pipes wrote:
>
> > On 10/14/2014 12:52 AM, Christopher Yeoh wrote:
> > > On Mon, 13 Oct 2014 22:20:32 -0400
> > > Jay Pipes wrote:
> > >
> > >> On 10/13/2014 07:11 PM, Christopher Yeoh wrote:
> >
On 2014年10月14日 21:57, Jay Pipes wrote:
On 10/14/2014 05:04 AM, Alex Xu wrote:
There is one reason to think about what projects *currently* do. When we
choice which convention we want.
For example, the CamelCase and snake_case, if the most project use
snake_case, then choice snake_case style
will
Hi all, to my understanding we certainly don't want developers to
arbitrarily extend APIs which would lead to a lot of mess, however we still
need to find a way to standardize how we augment existing APIs since they
are not perfect either.
On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 7:02 AM, Doug Hellmann
wrote:
>
On Oct 14, 2014, at 6:00 PM, Lance Bragstad wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 4:29 PM, Christopher Yeoh wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Oct 2014 10:29:34 -0500
> Lance Bragstad wrote:
>
> > I found a couple of free times available for a weekly meeting if
> > people are interested:
> >
> > https://re
On Tue, 14 Oct 2014 09:45:44 -0400
Jay Pipes wrote:
> On 10/14/2014 12:52 AM, Christopher Yeoh wrote:
> > On Mon, 13 Oct 2014 22:20:32 -0400
> > Jay Pipes wrote:
> >
> >> On 10/13/2014 07:11 PM, Christopher Yeoh wrote:
> >>> On Mon, 13 Oct 2014 10:52:26 -0400
> > And whilst I don't have a proble
On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 4:29 PM, Christopher Yeoh wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Oct 2014 10:29:34 -0500
> Lance Bragstad wrote:
>
> > I found a couple of free times available for a weekly meeting if
> > people are interested:
> >
> > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/128332/2
> >
> > Not sure if a meeting
On Tue, 14 Oct 2014 10:29:34 -0500
Lance Bragstad wrote:
> I found a couple of free times available for a weekly meeting if
> people are interested:
>
> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/128332/2
>
> Not sure if a meeting time has been hashed out already or not, and if
> it has I'll change the p
On Tue, 14 Oct 2014 09:57:01 -0400
Jay Pipes wrote:
> On 10/14/2014 05:04 AM, Alex Xu wrote:
> > There is one reason to think about what projects *currently* do.
> > When we choice which convention we want.
> > For example, the CamelCase and snake_case, if the most project use
> > snake_case, then
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/14/2014 10:22 AM, Everett Toews wrote:
>> I personally think proposing patches to an openstack-api repository is the
>> most effective way to make those proposals. Etherpads and wiki pages are
>> fine for dumping content, but IMO, we don't need
On 10/14/14, 10:22 AM, "Everett Toews" wrote:
>On Oct 14, 2014, at 8:57 AM, Jay Pipes wrote:
>
>> I personally think proposing patches to an openstack-api repository is
>>the most effective way to make those proposals. Etherpads and wiki pages
>>are fine for dumping content, but IMO, we don't
I found a couple of free times available for a weekly meeting if people are
interested:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/128332/2
Not sure if a meeting time has been hashed out already or not, and if it
has I'll change the patch accordingly. If not, we can iterate on possible
meeting times in the
On Oct 14, 2014, at 8:57 AM, Jay Pipes wrote:
> I personally think proposing patches to an openstack-api repository is the
> most effective way to make those proposals. Etherpads and wiki pages are fine
> for dumping content, but IMO, we don't need to dump content -- we already
> have plenty o
On 10/14/2014 05:04 AM, Alex Xu wrote:
There is one reason to think about what projects *currently* do. When we
choice which convention we want.
For example, the CamelCase and snake_case, if the most project use
snake_case, then choice snake_case style
will be the right.
I would posit that the
On 10/14/2014 12:52 AM, Christopher Yeoh wrote:
On Mon, 13 Oct 2014 22:20:32 -0400
Jay Pipes wrote:
On 10/13/2014 07:11 PM, Christopher Yeoh wrote:
On Mon, 13 Oct 2014 10:52:26 -0400
Jay Pipes wrote:
On 10/10/2014 02:05 AM, Christopher Yeoh wrote:
I agree with what you've written on the w
On 2014年10月14日 12:52, Christopher Yeoh wrote:
On Mon, 13 Oct 2014 22:20:32 -0400
Jay Pipes wrote:
On 10/13/2014 07:11 PM, Christopher Yeoh wrote:
On Mon, 13 Oct 2014 10:52:26 -0400
Jay Pipes wrote:
On 10/10/2014 02:05 AM, Christopher Yeoh wrote:
I agree with what you've written on the wik
Jay Pipes wrote:
> On 10/13/2014 07:11 PM, Christopher Yeoh wrote:
>> I guess we could also start fleshing out in the repo how we'll work in
>> practice too (eg once the document is stable what process do we have
>> for making changes - two +2's is probably not adequate for something
>> like this).
On Tue, 14 Oct 2014 05:27:21 +0200
"Ken'ichi Ohmichi" wrote:
> 2014-10-13 16:52 GMT+02:00 Jay Pipes :
> > On 10/10/2014 02:05 AM, Christopher Yeoh wrote:
> >>
> >> I agree with what you've written on the wiki page. I think our
> >> priority needs to be to flesh out
> >> https://wiki.openstack.org
On Mon, 13 Oct 2014 22:20:32 -0400
Jay Pipes wrote:
> On 10/13/2014 07:11 PM, Christopher Yeoh wrote:
> > On Mon, 13 Oct 2014 10:52:26 -0400
> > Jay Pipes wrote:
> >
> >> On 10/10/2014 02:05 AM, Christopher Yeoh wrote:
> >>> I agree with what you've written on the wiki page. I think our
> >>> pr
2014-10-13 16:52 GMT+02:00 Jay Pipes :
> On 10/10/2014 02:05 AM, Christopher Yeoh wrote:
>>
>> I agree with what you've written on the wiki page. I think our priority
>> needs to be to flesh out
>> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Governance/Proposed/APIGuidelines
>> so we have something to referenc
On 10/13/2014 07:11 PM, Christopher Yeoh wrote:
On Mon, 13 Oct 2014 10:52:26 -0400
Jay Pipes wrote:
On 10/10/2014 02:05 AM, Christopher Yeoh wrote:
I agree with what you've written on the wiki page. I think our
priority needs to be to flesh out
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Governance/Propo
On Mon, 13 Oct 2014 10:52:26 -0400
Jay Pipes wrote:
> On 10/10/2014 02:05 AM, Christopher Yeoh wrote:
> > I agree with what you've written on the wiki page. I think our
> > priority needs to be to flesh out
> > https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Governance/Proposed/APIGuidelines
> > so we have somet
Zhipeng Huang wrote:
> THX for the link ! So we will have the workshop on Nov 3th at Meridien
> Etoile Hotel?
The workshops happen on the 4th (Tuesday).
--
Thierry Carrez (ttx)
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://li
On 10/13/2014 11:10 AM, Russell Bryant wrote:
On 10/10/2014 12:09 PM, Jay Pipes wrote:
Thanks for getting this going, Everett! Comments inline...
On 10/08/2014 07:05 PM, Everett Toews wrote:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/API_Working_Group
This is the start of the API Working Group (API WG).
On 10/10/2014 12:09 PM, Jay Pipes wrote:
> Thanks for getting this going, Everett! Comments inline...
>
> On 10/08/2014 07:05 PM, Everett Toews wrote:
>> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/API_Working_Group
>>
>> This is the start of the API Working Group (API WG).
>
> yay! :)
>
>> To avoid bike sh
On 10/10/2014 02:05 AM, Christopher Yeoh wrote:
I agree with what you've written on the wiki page. I think our priority
needs to be to flesh out
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Governance/Proposed/APIGuidelines
so we have something to reference when reviewing specs. At the moment I
see that docum
Hi Thierry,
THX for the link ! So we will have the workshop on Nov 3th at Meridien
Etoile Hotel?
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 8:40 PM, Thierry Carrez
wrote:
> Zhipeng Huang wrote:
> > HI all, will we have a discussion on this issun at Paris Summit?
>
> I expect the API WG to propose API discussions
Zhipeng Huang wrote:
> HI all, will we have a discussion on this issun at Paris Summit?
I expect the API WG to propose API discussions within the "Cross-project
workshops" track and get space granted to them.
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/kilo-crossproject-summit-topics
Cheers,
--
Thierry C
HI all, will we have a discussion on this issun at Paris Summit?
On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 8:32 AM, Preston L. Bannister
wrote:
> Tricky. First, I am new to OpenStack, and as such tend to want to shut-up
> and listen.
>
> Second, I have done APIs for distributed systems for over 30 years. Yes, I
>
Tricky. First, I am new to OpenStack, and as such tend to want to shut-up
and listen.
Second, I have done APIs for distributed systems for over 30 years. Yes, I
got in very early. As such I am guilty of or saw lots of bad examples. Also
I found patterns that worked very well.
That said, the appro
Thanks for getting this going, Everett! Comments inline...
On 10/08/2014 07:05 PM, Everett Toews wrote:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/API_Working_Group
This is the start of the API Working Group (API WG).
yay! :)
To avoid bike shedding over the name of the working group, I decided
to titl
Hi Everett,
Great to see things moving with the API Working Group!
On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 9:35 AM, Everett Toews
wrote:
> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/API_Working_Group
>
> This is the start of the API Working Group (API WG).
>
> To avoid bike shedding over the name of the working group, I d
31 matches
Mail list logo