I wonder whether your neutron server codes have added the VPNaaS integration
with service type framework change on
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/41827/21 , if not, the service_provider option
is useless. You need to include the change before developing your own driver.
QA (In my opinion
Hi,
It matters, as someone might need to debug the backend setup and the name, if
exists, can add details.
This obviously a vendor's choice if they wish to push this back to backend but
the API should not remove this as a choice.
-Sam.
From: Eugene Nikanorov [mailto:enikano...@mirantis.com]
On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 4:46 AM, Raildo Mascena rail...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
Currently, there is a blueprint for creating a Domain in New Quota Driver
who is waiting approval, but that is already implemented. I believe that is
worth checking out.
Dear Qiu Yu,
The domain quota driver as well as the APIs to access the domain quota driver
is available. Please check the following
BluePrint - https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/domain-quota-driver-api
Wiki Page - https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/APIs_for_Domain_Quota_Driver
GitHub
Hi,
What's the status of this BP? -
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/router-port-forwarding
will it be ready for I3?
The BP is approved but the patch is abandoned
Regards
Yair
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
Hello everyone,
I am RobberPhex, a junior in Donghua University(Shanghai, China). I want to
participate in GSoC this year as Student. I know that OpenStack as a
potential org in GSoC, so I decide to participate.
I am a Student major in software engineering. In 2012 August, I first touch
And, should I CC this mail to OpenStack maillist?
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 5:14 PM, Robber Phex robberp...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello everyone,
I am RobberPhex, a junior in Donghua University(Shanghai, China). I want
to participate in GSoC this year as Student. I know that OpenStack as a
On 17/02/14 23:43, Robert Collins wrote:
So we experimented with the ci-overcloud (a TripleO deployed cloud for
running CI for TripleO) and it uncovered some bugs/limitations in
nodepool and zuul.
We need to fix these to reduce our negative impact on the
Openstack-infra team, before they'll
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 11:34:46PM -0700, Michael Still wrote:
Hi.
For the last day or so I've been chasing
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1246201, and I think I've found
the problem... libvirt doesn't migrate devices of type cdrom, even if
they're virtual. If I change the type of the
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 4:59 PM, Vinod Kumar Boppanna
vinod.kumar.boppa...@cern.ch wrote:
Dear Qiu Yu,
The domain quota driver as well as the APIs to access the domain quota
driver is available. Please check the following
BluePrint -
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 09:38:49AM +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 11:34:46PM -0700, Michael Still wrote:
Hi.
For the last day or so I've been chasing
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1246201, and I think I've found
the problem... libvirt doesn't migrate
Dear Qiu Yu,
Yes, the domain quota driver is included in the base commit. But if you just
want the domain quota driver and nothing else, then you can just download the
following files (Hope i haven't missed any file required just for domain quota
driver)
I have only played with Glance v2 locally on a devstack, so take what I write
with a graing of salt.
What's new in API v2?
-
+ registry: You don't need to run glance-registry anymore. Unless you still
support v1.
+ tags: Every image has a tag list metadata. A tag can be
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 2:43 AM, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com wrote:
So I'd saying changing it to 'disk' is out of the question unless
we unconditionally use vfat as the filesystem instead of iso9660.
So, at the moment we conflate a flag about format (iso9660 or vfat)
with a flag
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 3:14 AM, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 03:08:59AM -0700, Michael Still wrote:
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 2:43 AM, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com
wrote:
So I'd saying changing it to 'disk' is out of the question unless
we
On Feb 18, 2014 5:48 PM, Vinod Kumar Boppanna
vinod.kumar.boppa...@cern.ch wrote:
snip
The file quota.py contains the domain quota driver implemented by Tiago
and his team (I have just added few more functions to complete it).
Hope this is ok. If you are finding problem with this as well,
Regarding the DVR blueprint [1], I noticed that its corresponding Google Doc [2]
has been private / blocked for nearly a week now. It's very difficult to
participate
in upstream design discussions when the document is literally locked.
I would appreciate the re-opening of the document,
Hi Robber,
There are a number of discussions at OpenStack mail-list, you can find them
at mail-archive.
Hope it helps
Damon
2014-02-18 17:15 GMT+08:00 Robber Phex robberp...@gmail.com:
And, should I CC this mail to OpenStack maillist?
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 5:14 PM, Robber Phex
On 02/18/2014 05:20 AM, Michael Still wrote:
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 3:14 AM, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com
wrote:
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 03:08:59AM -0700, Michael Still wrote:
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 2:43 AM, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com
wrote:
So I'd saying changing
Hi Liusheng,
We are having the same performance issues and interested in
the following bug ticket.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ceilometer/+bug/1264434
You said,
As you said.both the schema level and the code level,the SQL driver in
Ceilometer should be optimized. thanks for your advicese.I
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 12:27 AM, Gary Kotton gkot...@vmware.com wrote:
Thanks!
That makes sense. Just odd how a -1 was received.
So I think that now a check run is automatically done if the latest
Jenkins run is too old (7 days?)
This is done because gate failures are so costly. The check
I mean, should I CC this mail to openst...@lists.openstack.org?
Because I see this:
Get in touch with mentors and students through the openstack-dev mailing
list from wiki.
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 6:39 PM, Damon Wang damon.dev...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Robber,
There are a number of discussions
You already can reverify on any approved change. Jenkins automatically runs
check pipeline jobs after 3 days.
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 4:29 PM, Christopher Yeoh cbky...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 12:27 AM, Gary Kotton gkot...@vmware.com wrote:
Thanks!
That makes sense. Just odd
Matt,
thanks, I'm agree with hadoop_version to version transition in v2 api.
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 5:02 AM, Matthew Farrellee m...@redhat.com wrote:
ok, i spent a little time looking at what the change impacts and it looks
like all the template validations we have currently require
Robber,
Adding your name in wiki is good, we have prepared the organization
application for OpenStack Foundation and submitted it. We will hear
from them in on 24th
(http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/events/google/gsoc2013) if
OpenStack Foundation has been accepted into the GSoC program or not.
We're still working through kinks in the new system, which is why it's
not fully documented yet.
During the 2 weeks of gate wedging in January, we discovered a number of
interesting things. Some review teams are really slow at dealing with
patches with a +2 already on them, and may wait 2 - 6
+1 for decoupling Tempest from devstack
Openstack deployment tool is TripleO / Heat -so it would be good to have an
Heat template to deploy and configure Tempest
andrea
From: David Kranz [mailto:dkr...@redhat.com]
Sent: 12 February 2014 23:23
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 5:23 PM, Frittoli, Andrea (Cloud Services)
fritt...@hp.com wrote:
Hi,
I’m working on a tempest blueprint to make tempest able to run 100% on
keystone v3 (or later versions) – the auth version to be used will be
available via a configuration switch.
The
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 11:52 PM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote:
All this blind meatgrinder behavior was putting tons of code into the
gate that could not pass. That, coupled with other race conditions we
were dealing with, put us into a state where we had a 60hr gate queue.
So we're
I'd suggest to reduce number of Murano repositories for several reasons:
* All other OpenStack projects have a single repo per project. While this
point might look like something not worth mentioning, it's really important:
- unified project structure simplifies life for new developers. once they
Thanks Angus and Devdatta. I think I understand.
Angus -- what you said seems to mirror the Heroku CLI usage: a) User runs
app/plan create (to create the remote repo), then b) user runs git push ...
(which pushes the code to the remote repo and creates 1 assembly, resulting in
a running
Hi all,
Scenario tests feature service dependency decorators in tests – so that a test
will run only if all required components are available.
I think we should extend them to all tests, including the API ones. For
instance Nova image tests depend on Glance, cinder attach/detach tests
Greetings,
Not sure if it is suitable to ask this question in openstack-dev list. Here
come a question related to network and want to get some input or comments
from you experts.
My case is as this: For some security issue, I want to put both MAC and
internal IP address to a pool and when create
I'm +1 on that. Mostly it's just a lot of time, so hasn't been dealt
with yet. Unless there is a completely pressing need, I'd rather see
that happen right after icehouse release, because I'm concerned it will
be a lot of changes coming in when people are trying to get other more
critical things
On Tue, 2014-02-18 at 14:33 +, Frittoli, Andrea (Cloud Services)
wrote:
Hi all,
Scenario tests feature service dependency decorators in tests – so
that a test will run only if all required components are available.
I think we should extend them to all tests, including the API ones.
This change was recently merged:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/69133/
Unfortunately it didn't enable lazy translations for the unit tests, so it
didn't catch the many places in Heat that won't work when lazy translations
are enabled. Notably there are a lot of cases where the code adds the
Hi Ruslan,
Thanks for your feedback. I completely agree with these arguments:
actually, these were the reasons why I've initiated this discussion.
Team, let's discuss this on the IRC meeting today.
--
Regards,
Alexander Tivelkov
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 5:55 PM, Ruslan Kamaldinov
This change was recently merged:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/69133/
Unfortunately it didn't enable lazy translations for the unit tests, so it
didn't catch the many places in Heat that won't work when lazy translations
are enabled. Notably there are a lot of cases where the code adds
[Moving to -dev list]
On Feb 18, 2014, at 9:12 AM, Sławek Kapłoński sla...@kaplonski.pl wrote:
Hello,
I'm trying to make something with neutron and ML2 plugin. Now I need to add
my own external network type (as there are Flat, VLAN, GRE and so on).
I searched for manuals for that but I
Hi everyone,
Here is the log from today's Hyper-v Meeting.
Meeting ended Tue Feb 18 16:17:57 2014 UTC. Information about MeetBot at
http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)
Minutes:
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/hyper_v/2014/hyper_v.2014-02-18-16.00.html
Minutes (text):
Hi,
thanks for the update
Link to the tempest bp I’m working on:
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/tempest/+spec/multi-keystone-api-version-tests
The update of the python binding to use the keystone binding is targeted for
icehouse or juno?
andrea
From: Dolph Mathews
This question is focused on Tripleo overcloud nodes meant to handle block
storage or object storage rather than the regular control and compute nodes.
Basically I want to get peoples thoughts on how much manipulation of the
underlying storage devices we should be expecting to do if we want
On 2014-02-18 09:15, Christopher Armstrong wrote:
This change was recently merged:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/69133/ [1]
Unfortunately it didn't enable lazy translations for the unit tests, so it
didn't catch the many places in Heat that won't work when lazy translations
I'm also a +1 for #2.However as discussed on IRC, we should clearly
spell out that the JSON blob should never be treated in a SQL-like manner.
The moment somebody says 'I want to make that item in the json
searchable' is the time to discuss adding it as part of the SQL schema.
On 2/13/14
All,
Myself and Jim Carey have been working on getting the right solution for
making lazy_translation work through Nova and Cinder.
The patch should have also had changes to remove the use of str() in any
LOG or exception messages as well as the removal of any places where
strings were being
Hi Jay,
In neutron API, you could create port with specified mac_address and fix_ip,
and then create vm with this port.
But the mapping of them need to manage by yourself.
在 2014年2月18日，22:41，Jay Lau jay.lau@gmail.com 写道：
Greetings,
Not sure if it is suitable to ask this question in
Jay,
We've got a similar requirement at CERN where we would like to have pools of
ip/mac combinations for each subnet and have it so that the user is just
allocated one (and for the same subnet that the hypervisor is on).
We've not found a good solution so far.
Tim
-Original
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 10:21 AM, Frittoli, Andrea (HP Cloud)
fritt...@hp.com wrote:
Hi,
thanks for the update
Link to the tempest bp I’m working on:
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/tempest/+spec/multi-keystone-api-version-tests
The update of the python binding to use the keystone
On 2/17/2014 4:41 PM, Russell Bryant wrote:
Greetings,
Last week we had an in-person Nova meetup. Bluehost was a wonderful and
generous host. Many thanks to them. :-)
Here's some observations and a summary of some of the things that we
discussed:
1) Mark McClain (Neutron PTL) and and
I am trying to figure out how I should be doing unit testing, and
documenting it in https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Gerrit_Workflow
Oddly, the situation for Nova seems reversed: run_tests.sh works and tox
does not. See http://paste.openstack.org/show/66969/ for my experiences
with each. Am I
Mike,
What version of tox do you use?
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 9:46 PM, Mike Spreitzer mspre...@us.ibm.com wrote:
I am trying to figure out how I should be doing unit testing, and
documenting it in https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Gerrit_Workflow
Oddly, the
Hi shshang, all,
I have some preliminary Horizon diffs available and if anyone
would be kind enough to patch them and try to test the
functionality, I'd really appreciate it.
I know I'm able to create subnets successfully with
the two modes but if there's anything else you'd like
to test or have
There was a lot of emails on that thread, but I am not seeing the discussion
converging. I would like to reiterate my concerns:
- We are trying to implement an API on a feature that is not supported by
openstack
- As a result, the implementation is overloading existing construct without
I agree. Let's proceed with option #2, and submit a wishlist bug to track this
as tech debt. We would like to come back to this later and add an option to use
a blob store for the JSON blob content, as Georgy mentioned. These could be
stored in swift, or a K/V store. It might be nice to have a
Ruslan,
I'm absolutely agree with you, only one correction, I think
murano-guestagent will better fit the repo content.
Thanks.
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 7:23 PM, Alexander Tivelkov
ativel...@mirantis.comwrote:
Hi Ruslan,
Thanks for your feedback. I completely agree with these arguments:
Hi Assaf,
Thanks for letting me know.
This document was completely open and accessible by everyone till last week.
Someone might have changed the settings on this document.
I don't remember that I changed any settings on this document.
The Powerpoint slides link that I forwarded yesterday also
Boris Pavlovic bpavlo...@mirantis.com wrote on 02/18/2014 12:55:26 PM:
What version of tox do you use?
That was using version 1.6.1 (as a workaround to
https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-ci/+bug/1274135).
Also, this was a fresh DevStack install (done about an hour or two before
I posted to
Hi all,
I'm writing some new code which uses objects sent around by rpc. I got to
implementing some new conductor methods and started wondering... what's the
current recommended way of interacting with the database? Many seem to be
around:
- fat model approach - put the db interaction in objects
-
Thanks Sumit and Stephen for information provided.
It appears to me that we can (and should) use the notion of
services/service chains within the group policy extension (and that has
been always one of our options). If this is a reasonable approach, then we
need to see how we can bring in these
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 11:14 AM, Jay S Bryant jsbry...@us.ibm.com wrote:
All,
Myself and Jim Carey have been working on getting the right solution for
making lazy_translation work through Nova and Cinder.
The patch should have also had changes to remove the use of str() in any
LOG or
2014-02-11 16:14 GMT+01:00 Anita Kuno:
On 02/11/2014 04:57 AM, Alan Pevec wrote:
Hi Mark and Anita,
could we declare stable/havana neutron gate jobs good enough at this point?
There are still random failures as this no-op change shows
https://review.openstack.org/72576
but I don't think
Hi Folks,
Irena suggested to have another sync-up meeting on Wednesday. So let's meet at
8:00am at #openstack-meeting-alt.
Thanks,
Robert
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Hi Paul
Sorry, I have missed this mail.
The reason for putting -1 was the gating issue, so it is OK now.
PS
Thank you for your rebasing this one
2014-02-16 16:43 GMT-08:00 Sumit Naiksatam sumitnaiksa...@gmail.com:
Hi Paul,
Our plan with FWaaS was to get it to parity with LBaaS as far as STF
Mike Spreitzer/Watson/IBM@IBMUS wrote on 02/18/2014 01:22:33 PM:
That was using version 1.6.1 (as a workaround to https://
bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-ci/+bug/1274135).
Also, this was a fresh DevStack install (done about an hour or two
before I posted to the list), with a pretty plain
On 02/18/2014 12:36 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote:
4) We talked about Nova's integration with Neutron and made some good
progress. We came up with a blueprint (ideally for Icehouse) to improve
Nova-Neutron interaction.
There are two cases we need to improve that have been particularly
painful.
So that the rest of the community is aware, the majority of keystone specific
topics are moving from the #openstack-dev channel to the #openstack-keystone
channel on Freenode. This is has been done to help free up #openstack-dev for
more cross-project discussion. Expect that the Keystone Core
Hi John,
thanks for the summary.
I've noticed one more fall out from swiftclient update in Grenade jobs
running on stable/havana changes e.g.
http://logs.openstack.org/02/73402/1/check/check-grenade-dsvm/a5650ac/console.html
...
2014-02-18 13:00:02.103 | Test Swift
2014-02-18 13:00:02.103 | +
Hi Everyone,
I will be on a plane during the Multitenancy Meeting on Friday. You are welcome
to have the meeting without me. Otherwise, we can just continue the excellent
discussion we have been having on the Mailing list.
Thanks,
Vish
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
Hi folks,
Recently we were discussing LBaaS object model with Mark McClain in order
to address several problems that we faced while approaching L7 rules and
multiple vips per pool.
To cut long story short: with existing workflow and model it's impossible
to use L7 rules, because
each pool being
I see a lot of good things happening on the hierarchical multi tenancy proposal
that Vish made a while back.
However, the focus so far is on roles and quota but could not find any
discussion related to resource ownership.
Is the plan to allow the creation of resources within any level of the
So i have been rather underwhelmed in the enthusiastic response to help out :-)
So far only wendar and johnthetubaguy have signed up. I was hoping for at
least 3-5 people to help with the initial triage. Please sign up this week if
you can help and i’ll schedule the meetings starting next
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 08:27:16PM +0100, Alan Pevec wrote:
Hi John,
thanks for the summary.
I've noticed one more fall out from swiftclient update in Grenade jobs
running on stable/havana changes e.g.
http://logs.openstack.org/02/73402/1/check/check-grenade-dsvm/a5650ac/console.html
...
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 2:39 PM, Elizabeth Krumbach Joseph
l...@princessleia.com wrote:
The OpenStack Infrastructure (Infra) team is hosting our weekly
meeting tomorrow, Tuesday February 18th, at 19:00 UTC in
#openstack-meeting
Thanks to everyone who joined us, minutes and log available here:
On 02/18/2014 01:22 PM, Pitucha, Stanislaw Izaak wrote:
Hi all,
I'm writing some new code which uses objects sent around by rpc. I got to
implementing some new conductor methods and started wondering... what's the
current recommended way of interacting with the database? Many seem to be
- fat model approach - put the db interaction in objects
If it's just DB interaction, then yes, in the object for sure.
- put the db interactions in the conductor itself
There is a reasonable separation between using conductor for mechanics
(i.e. API deferring a long-running activity to
On Feb 18, 2014, at 11:31 AM, Martin, JC jch.mar...@gmail.com wrote:
I see a lot of good things happening on the hierarchical multi tenancy
proposal that Vish made a while back.
However, the focus so far is on roles and quota but could not find any
discussion related to resource
Hi!
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 12:18 AM, Samuel Bercovici samu...@radware.comwrote:
Hi,
It matters, as someone might need to “debug” the backend setup and the
name, if exists, can add details.
This obviously a vendor’s choice if they wish to push this back to backend
but the API should
Hi All,
All cinder test cases are failing with error 'cannot import rpcapi', though
same files work fine in live cinder setup. I wonder what's going wrong when
unit testing is triggered. Can any one help me out here?
--
Thanks,
IK
___
OpenStack-dev
My observation has been that Murano has changed from a Windows focused
Deployment Service to a Metadata Application Catalog Workflow thing (I
fully admit this may be an invalid observation). It's unclear to me what
OpenStack pain/use-cases is to be solved by complex object composition,
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 10:03 AM, Martin, JC jch.mar...@gmail.com wrote:
There was a lot of emails on that thread, but I am not seeing the discussion
converging. I would like to reiterate my concerns:
- We are trying to implement an API on a feature that is not supported by
openstack
I
Sylvain-
As you can tell from the meeting today the scheduler sub-group is really not
the gantt group meeting, I try to make sure that messages for things like the
agenda and what not include both `gantt' and `scheduler' in the subject so it's
clear we're talking about the same thing.
Note
Maybe a crazy idea butŠ
What if we simply don't store the JSON blob data for M1 instead of putting
storing it in a way we don't like long term? This way, there is no need
to remember to change something later even though a bug could be created
anyways. I believe the fields that would be
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 1:21 PM, iKhan ik.ibadk...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
All cinder test cases are failing with error 'cannot import rpcapi', though
same files work fine in live cinder setup. I wonder what's going wrong when
unit testing is triggered. Can any one help me out here?
--
Hi folks,
I see little value in being able to debug such things because it is for
developers only. However given that such choice doesn't affect workflow and
public API, we can add corresponding calls to the driver API.
Thanks,
Eugene.
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 12:20 AM, Stephen Balukoff
On 2/18/2014 1:12 PM, Russell Bryant wrote:
On 02/18/2014 12:36 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote:
4) We talked about Nova's integration with Neutron and made some good
progress. We came up with a blueprint (ideally for Icehouse) to improve
Nova-Neutron interaction.
There are two cases we need to
Yes I do run in venv, I'm checking for missing libraries.
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 2:03 AM, John Griffith
john.griff...@solidfire.comwrote:
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 1:21 PM, iKhan ik.ibadk...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
All cinder test cases are failing with error 'cannot import rpcapi',
A couple quick suggestions (additions):
Entity: L7Rule
o Attribute: type
§ Possible values:
- HTTP_METHOD
o Attribute: compare_type
§ Possible values:
- GT (greater than)
- LT (less than)
- GE (greater than or equal to)
- LE (less than or equal to)
Will we
That is exactly option #2 which propose to store attributes in columns. So
there will be a limited set of attributes and each of them will have its
own column in a table.
Thanks
Georgy
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 10:55 AM, Paul Montgomery
paul.montgom...@rackspace.com wrote:
Maybe a crazy idea
Joe,
See my comments in line.
On Feb 18, 2014, at 12:26 PM, Joe Gordon joe.gord...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 10:03 AM, Martin, JC jch.mar...@gmail.com wrote:
There was a lot of emails on that thread, but I am not seeing the discussion
converging. I would like to reiterate my
Oh! One thing I forgot to mention below:
On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 11:55 PM, Avishay Balderman avish...@radware.comwrote:
Entity: L7Rule
Field : compare_type
Description: The way we compare the value against a given value
Possible values: REG_EXP, EQ, GT, LT,EQ_IGNORE_CASE,(?)
*Note*:
1. Feature is giving AWS VPC api compatibility with existing openstack
structure
2. It does give full AWS compatibility (except for network ACL which was
differed). Shared networks, FIP within scope of VPC is not some thing AWS
provides. So it is not partial support.
3. IMO it would not be major
Vish,
See comments below.
JC
On Feb 18, 2014, at 12:19 PM, Vishvananda Ishaya vishvana...@gmail.com wrote:
On Feb 18, 2014, at 11:31 AM, Martin, JC jch.mar...@gmail.com wrote:
I see a lot of good things happening on the hierarchical multi tenancy
proposal that Vish made a while back.
Hi all,
In Rackspace's quark plugin (github.com/rackerlabs/quark), we’ve developed an
extension for MAC address ranges (MARs) as a top-level resource. Thus, the
Neutron service manages the MAC address allocation from a pool of ranges (as
opposed to randomly generating a MAC address). However,
From: Russell Bryant [rbry...@redhat.com]
Sent: 17 February 2014 22:41
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List
Subject: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Meetup Summary
5) Driver CI - We talked about the ongoing effort to set up CI for all
of the compute drivers. The discussion was mostly a status
Hi,
I am finishing a patch that Seif Lofty started. It shows more information
for the quota-usage health.
https://review.openstack.org/gitweb?p=openstack%2Fpython-cinderclient.git;a=commitdiff;h=785cae3a17fbeccb366b01ece8f8704edf4d2ae7
I am not sure how the unit test for this should work.
I've
Hi Don,
2014-02-18 21:28 GMT+01:00 Dugger, Donald D donald.d.dug...@intel.com:
Sylvain-
As you can tell from the meeting today the scheduler sub-group is really
not the gantt group meeting, I try to make sure that messages for things
like the agenda and what not include both `gantt'
Hello,
Thanks for an answear.
I want to add own network type which will be very similiar to flat network (in
type_driver I think it will be the same) but will assign IPs to instances in
different way (not exactly with some L2 protocol). I want to add own network
because I want to have own name
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 1:01 PM, Martin, JC jch.mar...@gmail.com wrote:
Joe,
See my comments in line.
On Feb 18, 2014, at 12:26 PM, Joe Gordon joe.gord...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 10:03 AM, Martin, JC jch.mar...@gmail.com wrote:
There was a lot of emails on that thread, but
Thanks Dong for the great help, it does worked with command line!
This seems not available via dashboard, right?
Thanks,
Jay
2014-02-19 1:11 GMT+08:00 Dong Liu willowd...@gmail.com:
Hi Jay,
In neutron API, you could create port with specified mac_address and
fix_ip, and then create vm
On 18/02/14 14:19 +, Shaunak Kashyap wrote:
Thanks Angus and Devdatta. I think I understand.
Angus -- what you said seems to mirror the Heroku CLI usage: a) User runs app/plan
create (to create the remote repo), then b) user runs git push ... (which pushes
the code to the remote repo and
1 - 100 of 121 matches
Mail list logo
