Re: [openstack-dev] How to implement and configure a new Neutron vpnaas driver from scratch?

2014-02-18 Thread Bo Lin
I wonder whether your neutron server codes have added the VPNaaS integration with service type framework change on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/41827/21 , if not, the service_provider option is useless. You need to include the change before developing your own driver. QA (In my opinion

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] L7 - Update L7Policy

2014-02-18 Thread Samuel Bercovici
Hi, It matters, as someone might need to debug the backend setup and the name, if exists, can add details. This obviously a vendor's choice if they wish to push this back to backend but the API should not remove this as a choice. -Sam. From: Eugene Nikanorov [mailto:enikano...@mirantis.com]

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] Centralized policy rules and quotas

2014-02-18 Thread Qiu Yu
On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 4:46 AM, Raildo Mascena rail...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, Currently, there is a blueprint for creating a Domain in New Quota Driver who is waiting approval, but that is already implemented. I believe that is worth checking out.

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] Centralized policy rules and quotas

2014-02-18 Thread Vinod Kumar Boppanna
Dear Qiu Yu, The domain quota driver as well as the APIs to access the domain quota driver is available. Please check the following BluePrint - https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/domain-quota-driver-api Wiki Page - https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/APIs_for_Domain_Quota_Driver GitHub

[openstack-dev] [Neutron] port forwarding from gateway to internal hosts

2014-02-18 Thread Yair Fried
Hi, What's the status of this BP? - https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/router-port-forwarding will it be ready for I3? The BP is approved but the patch is abandoned Regards Yair ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list

[openstack-dev] [GSoC] Participate as participant

2014-02-18 Thread Robber Phex
Hello everyone, I am RobberPhex, a junior in Donghua University(Shanghai, China). I want to participate in GSoC this year as Student. I know that OpenStack as a potential org in GSoC, so I decide to participate. I am a Student major in software engineering. In 2012 August, I first touch

Re: [openstack-dev] [GSoC] Participate as participant

2014-02-18 Thread Robber Phex
And, should I CC this mail to OpenStack maillist? On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 5:14 PM, Robber Phex robberp...@gmail.com wrote: Hello everyone, I am RobberPhex, a junior in Donghua University(Shanghai, China). I want to participate in GSoC this year as Student. I know that OpenStack as a

Re: [openstack-dev] [Tripleo]help needed - nodepool and zuul support for ci-overcloud

2014-02-18 Thread Derek Higgins
On 17/02/14 23:43, Robert Collins wrote: So we experimented with the ci-overcloud (a TripleO deployed cloud for running CI for TripleO) and it uncovered some bugs/limitations in nodepool and zuul. We need to fix these to reduce our negative impact on the Openstack-infra team, before they'll

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] libvirt doesn't migrate cdrom devices?

2014-02-18 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 11:34:46PM -0700, Michael Still wrote: Hi. For the last day or so I've been chasing https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1246201, and I think I've found the problem... libvirt doesn't migrate devices of type cdrom, even if they're virtual. If I change the type of the

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] Centralized policy rules and quotas

2014-02-18 Thread Qiu Yu
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 4:59 PM, Vinod Kumar Boppanna vinod.kumar.boppa...@cern.ch wrote: Dear Qiu Yu, The domain quota driver as well as the APIs to access the domain quota driver is available. Please check the following BluePrint -

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] libvirt doesn't migrate cdrom devices?

2014-02-18 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 09:38:49AM +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 11:34:46PM -0700, Michael Still wrote: Hi. For the last day or so I've been chasing https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1246201, and I think I've found the problem... libvirt doesn't migrate

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] Centralized policy rules and quotas

2014-02-18 Thread Vinod Kumar Boppanna
Dear Qiu Yu, Yes, the domain quota driver is included in the base commit. But if you just want the domain quota driver and nothing else, then you can just download the following files (Hope i haven't missed any file required just for domain quota driver)

Re: [openstack-dev] Glance v1 and v2

2014-02-18 Thread Joe Hakim Rahme
I have only played with Glance v2 locally on a devstack, so take what I write with a graing of salt. What's new in API v2? - + registry: You don't need to run glance-registry anymore. Unless you still support v1. + tags: Every image has a tag list metadata. A tag can be

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] libvirt doesn't migrate cdrom devices?

2014-02-18 Thread Michael Still
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 2:43 AM, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com wrote: So I'd saying changing it to 'disk' is out of the question unless we unconditionally use vfat as the filesystem instead of iso9660. So, at the moment we conflate a flag about format (iso9660 or vfat) with a flag

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] libvirt doesn't migrate cdrom devices?

2014-02-18 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 03:08:59AM -0700, Michael Still wrote: On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 2:43 AM, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com wrote: So I'd saying changing it to 'disk' is out of the question unless we unconditionally use vfat as the filesystem instead of iso9660. So, at the

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] libvirt doesn't migrate cdrom devices?

2014-02-18 Thread Michael Still
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 3:14 AM, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com wrote: On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 03:08:59AM -0700, Michael Still wrote: On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 2:43 AM, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com wrote: So I'd saying changing it to 'disk' is out of the question unless we

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] Centralized policy rules and quotas

2014-02-18 Thread Qiu Yu
On Feb 18, 2014 5:48 PM, Vinod Kumar Boppanna vinod.kumar.boppa...@cern.ch wrote: snip The file quota.py contains the domain quota driver implemented by Tiago and his team (I have just added few more functions to complete it). Hope this is ok. If you are finding problem with this as well,

[openstack-dev] [Neutron] DVR blueprint document locked / private

2014-02-18 Thread Assaf Muller
Regarding the DVR blueprint [1], I noticed that its corresponding Google Doc [2] has been private / blocked for nearly a week now. It's very difficult to participate in upstream design discussions when the document is literally locked. I would appreciate the re-opening of the document,

Re: [openstack-dev] [GSoC] Participate as participant

2014-02-18 Thread Damon Wang
Hi Robber, There are a number of discussions at OpenStack mail-list, you can find them at mail-archive. Hope it helps Damon 2014-02-18 17:15 GMT+08:00 Robber Phex robberp...@gmail.com: And, should I CC this mail to OpenStack maillist? On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 5:14 PM, Robber Phex

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] libvirt doesn't migrate cdrom devices?

2014-02-18 Thread Sean Dague
On 02/18/2014 05:20 AM, Michael Still wrote: On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 3:14 AM, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com wrote: On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 03:08:59AM -0700, Michael Still wrote: On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 2:43 AM, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com wrote: So I'd saying changing

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ceilometer] time consuming of listing resource

2014-02-18 Thread Mitsuru Kanabuchi
Hi Liusheng, We are having the same performance issues and interested in the following bug ticket. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ceilometer/+bug/1264434 You said, As you said.both the schema level and the code level,the SQL driver in Ceilometer should be optimized. thanks for your advicese.I

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] L7 data types

2014-02-18 Thread Avishay Balderman
Here are the suggested values for the attributes below: · Entity: L7Rule o Attribute: type § Possible values: · HOST_NAME · PATH · FILE_NAME · FILE_TYPE · HEADER · COOKIE o Attribute: compare_type § Possible values: ·

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] reverify/recheck

2014-02-18 Thread Christopher Yeoh
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 12:27 AM, Gary Kotton gkot...@vmware.com wrote: Thanks! That makes sense. Just odd how a -1 was received. So I think that now a check run is automatically done if the latest Jenkins run is too old (7 days?) This is done because gate failures are so costly. The check

Re: [openstack-dev] [GSoC] Participate as participant

2014-02-18 Thread Robber Phex
I mean, should I CC this mail to openst...@lists.openstack.org? Because I see this: Get in touch with mentors and students through the openstack-dev mailing list from wiki. On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 6:39 PM, Damon Wang damon.dev...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Robber, There are a number of discussions

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] reverify/recheck

2014-02-18 Thread Sergey Lukjanov
You already can reverify on any approved change. Jenkins automatically runs check pipeline jobs after 3 days. On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 4:29 PM, Christopher Yeoh cbky...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 12:27 AM, Gary Kotton gkot...@vmware.com wrote: Thanks! That makes sense. Just odd

Re: [openstack-dev] [savanna] plugin version or hadoop version?

2014-02-18 Thread Sergey Lukjanov
Matt, thanks, I'm agree with hadoop_version to version transition in v2 api. On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 5:02 AM, Matthew Farrellee m...@redhat.com wrote: ok, i spent a little time looking at what the change impacts and it looks like all the template validations we have currently require

Re: [openstack-dev] [GSoC] Participate as participant

2014-02-18 Thread Davanum Srinivas
Robber, Adding your name in wiki is good, we have prepared the organization application for OpenStack Foundation and submitted it. We will hear from them in on 24th (http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/events/google/gsoc2013) if OpenStack Foundation has been accepted into the GSoC program or not.

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] reverify/recheck

2014-02-18 Thread Sean Dague
We're still working through kinks in the new system, which is why it's not fully documented yet. During the 2 weeks of gate wedging in January, we discovered a number of interesting things. Some review teams are really slow at dealing with patches with a +2 already on them, and may wait 2 - 6

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa][tempest][rally] Rally Tempest integration: tempest.conf autogeneration

2014-02-18 Thread Frittoli, Andrea (Cloud Services)
+1 for decoupling Tempest from devstack Openstack deployment tool is TripleO / Heat -so it would be good to have an Heat template to deploy and configure Tempest andrea From: David Kranz [mailto:dkr...@redhat.com] Sent: 12 February 2014 23:23 To: OpenStack Development Mailing List

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone][all] Keystone V2 and V3 support in icehouse

2014-02-18 Thread Dolph Mathews
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 5:23 PM, Frittoli, Andrea (Cloud Services) fritt...@hp.com wrote: Hi, I’m working on a tempest blueprint to make tempest able to run 100% on keystone v3 (or later versions) – the auth version to be used will be available via a configuration switch. The

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] reverify/recheck

2014-02-18 Thread Christopher Yeoh
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 11:52 PM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote: All this blind meatgrinder behavior was putting tons of code into the gate that could not pass. That, coupled with other race conditions we were dealing with, put us into a state where we had a 60hr gate queue. So we're

Re: [openstack-dev] [Murano] Repositoris re-organization

2014-02-18 Thread Ruslan Kamaldinov
I'd suggest to reduce number of Murano repositories for several reasons: * All other OpenStack projects have a single repo per project. While this point might look like something not worth mentioning, it's really important: - unified project structure simplifies life for new developers. once they

Re: [openstack-dev] Glance v1 and v2

2014-02-18 Thread Flavio Percoco
On 18/02/14 10:57 +0100, Joe Hakim Rahme wrote: I have only played with Glance v2 locally on a devstack, so take what I write with a graing of salt. What's new in API v2? - + registry: You don't need to run glance-registry anymore. Unless you still support v1. You can

Re: [openstack-dev] [solum] Question about solum-minimal-cli BP

2014-02-18 Thread Shaunak Kashyap
Thanks Angus and Devdatta. I think I understand. Angus -- what you said seems to mirror the Heroku CLI usage: a) User runs app/plan create (to create the remote repo), then b) user runs git push ... (which pushes the code to the remote repo and creates 1 assembly, resulting in a running

[openstack-dev] [QA] Service dependency decorators in tests

2014-02-18 Thread Frittoli, Andrea (Cloud Services)
Hi all, Scenario tests feature service dependency decorators in tests – so that a test will run only if all required components are available. I think we should extend them to all tests, including the API ones. For instance Nova image tests depend on Glance, cinder attach/detach tests

[openstack-dev] [Network] Allocate MAC and IP address for a VM instance

2014-02-18 Thread Jay Lau
Greetings, Not sure if it is suitable to ask this question in openstack-dev list. Here come a question related to network and want to get some input or comments from you experts. My case is as this: For some security issue, I want to put both MAC and internal IP address to a pool and when create

Re: [openstack-dev] [QA] Service dependency decorators in tests

2014-02-18 Thread Sean Dague
I'm +1 on that. Mostly it's just a lot of time, so hasn't been dealt with yet. Unless there is a completely pressing need, I'd rather see that happen right after icehouse release, because I'm concerned it will be a lot of changes coming in when people are trying to get other more critical things

Re: [openstack-dev] [QA] Service dependency decorators in tests

2014-02-18 Thread Jay Pipes
On Tue, 2014-02-18 at 14:33 +, Frittoli, Andrea (Cloud Services) wrote: Hi all, Scenario tests feature service dependency decorators in tests – so that a test will run only if all required components are available. I think we should extend them to all tests, including the API ones.

[openstack-dev] [Heat] lazy translation is breaking Heat

2014-02-18 Thread Christopher Armstrong
This change was recently merged: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/69133/ Unfortunately it didn't enable lazy translations for the unit tests, so it didn't catch the many places in Heat that won't work when lazy translations are enabled. Notably there are a lot of cases where the code adds the

Re: [openstack-dev] [Murano] Repositoris re-organization

2014-02-18 Thread Alexander Tivelkov
Hi Ruslan, Thanks for your feedback. I completely agree with these arguments: actually, these were the reasons why I've initiated this discussion. Team, let's discuss this on the IRC meeting today. -- Regards, Alexander Tivelkov On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 5:55 PM, Ruslan Kamaldinov

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] lazy translation is breaking Heat

2014-02-18 Thread Thomas Herve
This change was recently merged: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/69133/ Unfortunately it didn't enable lazy translations for the unit tests, so it didn't catch the many places in Heat that won't work when lazy translations are enabled. Notably there are a lot of cases where the code adds

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-dev] [neutron] [ml2] Neutron and ML2 - adding new network type

2014-02-18 Thread Kyle Mestery
[Moving to -dev list] On Feb 18, 2014, at 9:12 AM, Sławek Kapłoński sla...@kaplonski.pl wrote: Hello, I'm trying to make something with neutron and ML2 plugin. Now I need to add my own external network type (as there are Flat, VLAN, GRE and so on). I searched for manuals for that but I

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] lazy translation is breaking Heat

2014-02-18 Thread Christopher Armstrong
I've filed a bug about this, https://bugs.launchpad.net/heat/+bug/1281644 On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 9:15 AM, Christopher Armstrong chris.armstr...@rackspace.com wrote: This change was recently merged: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/69133/ Unfortunately it didn't enable lazy translations

[openstack-dev] Hyper-V meeting minutes

2014-02-18 Thread Peter Pouliot
Hi everyone, Here is the log from today's Hyper-v Meeting. Meeting ended Tue Feb 18 16:17:57 2014 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) Minutes: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/hyper_v/2014/hyper_v.2014-02-18-16.00.html Minutes (text):

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone][all] Keystone V2 and V3 support in icehouse

2014-02-18 Thread Frittoli, Andrea (HP Cloud)
Hi, thanks for the update Link to the tempest bp I’m working on: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/tempest/+spec/multi-keystone-api-version-tests The update of the python binding to use the keystone binding is targeted for icehouse or juno? andrea From: Dolph Mathews

[openstack-dev] [Tripleo] How much local storage device preparation should tripleo do?

2014-02-18 Thread Charles Crouch
This question is focused on Tripleo overcloud nodes meant to handle block storage or object storage rather than the regular control and compute nodes. Basically I want to get peoples thoughts on how much manipulation of the underlying storage devices we should be expecting to do if we want

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] lazy translation is breaking Heat

2014-02-18 Thread Ben Nemec
On 2014-02-18 09:15, Christopher Armstrong wrote: This change was recently merged: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/69133/ [1] Unfortunately it didn't enable lazy translations for the unit tests, so it didn't catch the many places in Heat that won't work when lazy translations

Re: [openstack-dev] [Solum] Regarding language pack database schema

2014-02-18 Thread Paul Czarkowski
I'm also a +1 for #2.However as discussed on IRC, we should clearly spell out that the JSON blob should never be treated in a SQL-like manner. The moment somebody says 'I want to make that item in the json searchable' is the time to discuss adding it as part of the SQL schema. On 2/13/14

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] lazy translation is breaking Heat

2014-02-18 Thread Jay S Bryant
All, Myself and Jim Carey have been working on getting the right solution for making lazy_translation work through Nova and Cinder. The patch should have also had changes to remove the use of str() in any LOG or exception messages as well as the removal of any places where strings were being

Re: [openstack-dev] [Network] Allocate MAC and IP address for a VM instance

2014-02-18 Thread Dong Liu
Hi Jay, In neutron API, you could create port with specified mac_address and fix_ip, and then create vm with this port. But the mapping of them need to manage by yourself. 在 2014年2月18日,22:41,Jay Lau jay.lau@gmail.com 写道: Greetings, Not sure if it is suitable to ask this question in

Re: [openstack-dev] [QA] Service dependency decorators in tests

2014-02-18 Thread Boris Pavlovic
Hi, I will be glad to help with this part! It shouldn't be too much work to handle this. Who will lead this thing?) Best regards, Boris Pavlovic On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 7:51 PM, Matthew Treinish mtrein...@kortar.orgwrote: On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 09:42:43AM -0500, Sean Dague wrote: I'm

Re: [openstack-dev] [Network] Allocate MAC and IP address for a VM instance

2014-02-18 Thread Tim Bell
Jay, We've got a similar requirement at CERN where we would like to have pools of ip/mac combinations for each subnet and have it so that the user is just allocated one (and for the same subnet that the hypervisor is on). We've not found a good solution so far. Tim -Original

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone][all] Keystone V2 and V3 support in icehouse

2014-02-18 Thread Dolph Mathews
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 10:21 AM, Frittoli, Andrea (HP Cloud) fritt...@hp.com wrote: Hi, thanks for the update Link to the tempest bp I’m working on: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/tempest/+spec/multi-keystone-api-version-tests The update of the python binding to use the keystone

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Meetup Summary

2014-02-18 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 2/17/2014 4:41 PM, Russell Bryant wrote: Greetings, Last week we had an in-person Nova meetup. Bluehost was a wonderful and generous host. Many thanks to them. :-) Here's some observations and a summary of some of the things that we discussed: 1) Mark McClain (Neutron PTL) and and

[openstack-dev] Unit Testing Nova

2014-02-18 Thread Mike Spreitzer
I am trying to figure out how I should be doing unit testing, and documenting it in https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Gerrit_Workflow Oddly, the situation for Nova seems reversed: run_tests.sh works and tox does not. See http://paste.openstack.org/show/66969/ for my experiences with each. Am I

Re: [openstack-dev] Unit Testing Nova

2014-02-18 Thread Boris Pavlovic
Mike, What version of tox do you use? Best regards, Boris Pavlovic On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 9:46 PM, Mike Spreitzer mspre...@us.ibm.com wrote: I am trying to figure out how I should be doing unit testing, and documenting it in https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Gerrit_Workflow Oddly, the

[openstack-dev] [neutron][IPv6] Testing functionality of IPv6 modes using Horizon

2014-02-18 Thread Abishek Subramanian (absubram)
Hi shshang, all, I have some preliminary Horizon diffs available and if anyone would be kind enough to patch them and try to test the functionality, I'd really appreciate it. I know I'm able to create subnets successfully with the two modes but if there's anything else you'd like to test or have

Re: [openstack-dev] VPC Proposal

2014-02-18 Thread Martin, JC
There was a lot of emails on that thread, but I am not seeing the discussion converging. I would like to reiterate my concerns: - We are trying to implement an API on a feature that is not supported by openstack - As a result, the implementation is overloading existing construct without

Re: [openstack-dev] [Solum] Regarding language pack database schema

2014-02-18 Thread Adrian Otto
I agree. Let's proceed with option #2, and submit a wishlist bug to track this as tech debt. We would like to come back to this later and add an option to use a blob store for the JSON blob content, as Georgy mentioned. These could be stored in swift, or a K/V store. It might be nice to have a

Re: [openstack-dev] [Murano] Repositoris re-organization

2014-02-18 Thread Sergey Lukjanov
Ruslan, I'm absolutely agree with you, only one correction, I think murano-guestagent will better fit the repo content. Thanks. On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 7:23 PM, Alexander Tivelkov ativel...@mirantis.comwrote: Hi Ruslan, Thanks for your feedback. I completely agree with these arguments:

Re: [openstack-dev] DVR blueprint document locked / private

2014-02-18 Thread Vasudevan, Swaminathan (PNB Roseville)
Hi Assaf, Thanks for letting me know. This document was completely open and accessible by everyone till last week. Someone might have changed the settings on this document. I don't remember that I changed any settings on this document. The Powerpoint slides link that I forwarded yesterday also

[openstack-dev] [Neutron] VPC Proposal

2014-02-18 Thread Martin, JC
We have started a discussion on the proper model to implement a Virtual Private Cloud (VPC) feature in openstack. I feel that there was not a lot of discussion on this topic in the past, and this may be because of the ML tags used. I am pointing out this discussion to this group with the

Re: [openstack-dev] Unit Testing Nova

2014-02-18 Thread Mike Spreitzer
Boris Pavlovic bpavlo...@mirantis.com wrote on 02/18/2014 12:55:26 PM: What version of tox do you use? That was using version 1.6.1 (as a workaround to https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-ci/+bug/1274135). Also, this was a fresh DevStack install (done about an hour or two before I posted to

[openstack-dev] Db interaction: conductor vs objects vs apis

2014-02-18 Thread Pitucha, Stanislaw Izaak
Hi all, I'm writing some new code which uses objects sent around by rpc. I got to implementing some new conductor methods and started wondering... what's the current recommended way of interacting with the database? Many seem to be around: - fat model approach - put the db interaction in objects -

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][policy] Using network services with network policies

2014-02-18 Thread Mohammad Banikazemi
Thanks Sumit and Stephen for information provided. It appears to me that we can (and should) use the notion of services/service chains within the group policy extension (and that has been always one of our options). If this is a reasonable approach, then we need to see how we can bring in these

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] lazy translation is breaking Heat

2014-02-18 Thread Christopher Armstrong
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 11:14 AM, Jay S Bryant jsbry...@us.ibm.com wrote: All, Myself and Jim Carey have been working on getting the right solution for making lazy_translation work through Nova and Cinder. The patch should have also had changes to remove the use of str() in any LOG or

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-stable-maint] Stable gate status?

2014-02-18 Thread Alan Pevec
2014-02-11 16:14 GMT+01:00 Anita Kuno: On 02/11/2014 04:57 AM, Alan Pevec wrote: Hi Mark and Anita, could we declare stable/havana neutron gate jobs good enough at this point? There are still random failures as this no-op change shows https://review.openstack.org/72576 but I don't think

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] VPC Proposal

2014-02-18 Thread Ravi Chunduru
Hi JC, I suggest we have a VPC meetup to get those who are interested on the same page and present the resulted draft proposal in the summit design discussions. Thanks, -Ravi. On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 10:12 AM, Martin, JC jch.mar...@gmail.com wrote: We have started a discussion on the proper

[openstack-dev] [nova][neutron] SRIOV Meeting on Wednesday Feb.19th

2014-02-18 Thread Robert Li (baoli)
Hi Folks, Irena suggested to have another sync-up meeting on Wednesday. So let's meet at 8:00am at #openstack-meeting-alt. Thanks, Robert ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Urgent questions on Service Type Framework for VPNaaS

2014-02-18 Thread Nachi Ueno
Hi Paul Sorry, I have missed this mail. The reason for putting -1 was the gating issue, so it is OK now. PS Thank you for your rebasing this one 2014-02-16 16:43 GMT-08:00 Sumit Naiksatam sumitnaiksa...@gmail.com: Hi Paul, Our plan with FWaaS was to get it to parity with LBaaS as far as STF

Re: [openstack-dev] Unit Testing Nova

2014-02-18 Thread Mike Spreitzer
Mike Spreitzer/Watson/IBM@IBMUS wrote on 02/18/2014 01:22:33 PM: That was using version 1.6.1 (as a workaround to https:// bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-ci/+bug/1274135). Also, this was a fresh DevStack install (done about an hour or two before I posted to the list), with a pretty plain

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Meetup Summary

2014-02-18 Thread Russell Bryant
On 02/18/2014 12:36 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: 4) We talked about Nova's integration with Neutron and made some good progress. We came up with a blueprint (ideally for Icehouse) to improve Nova-Neutron interaction. There are two cases we need to improve that have been particularly painful.

[openstack-dev] [Keystone] IRC Channel Venue Change for Keystone Development topics

2014-02-18 Thread Morgan Fainberg
So that the rest of the community is aware, the majority of keystone specific topics are moving from the #openstack-dev channel to the #openstack-keystone channel on Freenode. This is has been done to help free up #openstack-dev for more cross-project discussion.  Expect that the Keystone Core

Re: [openstack-dev] [All] Fixed recent gate issues

2014-02-18 Thread Alan Pevec
Hi John, thanks for the summary. I've noticed one more fall out from swiftclient update in Grenade jobs running on stable/havana changes e.g. http://logs.openstack.org/02/73402/1/check/check-grenade-dsvm/a5650ac/console.html ... 2014-02-18 13:00:02.103 | Test Swift 2014-02-18 13:00:02.103 | +

[openstack-dev] [keystone][nova]Hierarchical Multitenancy Meeting

2014-02-18 Thread Vishvananda Ishaya
Hi Everyone, I will be on a plane during the Multitenancy Meeting on Friday. You are welcome to have the meeting without me. Otherwise, we can just continue the excellent discussion we have been having on the Mailing list. Thanks, Vish signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP

[openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Object Model discussion

2014-02-18 Thread Eugene Nikanorov
Hi folks, Recently we were discussing LBaaS object model with Mark McClain in order to address several problems that we faced while approaching L7 rules and multiple vips per pool. To cut long story short: with existing workflow and model it's impossible to use L7 rules, because each pool being

[openstack-dev] Hierarchical Multitenancy and resource ownership

2014-02-18 Thread Martin, JC
I see a lot of good things happening on the hierarchical multi tenancy proposal that Vish made a while back. However, the focus so far is on roles and quota but could not find any discussion related to resource ownership. Is the plan to allow the creation of resources within any level of the

Re: [openstack-dev] call for help with nova bug management

2014-02-18 Thread Tracy Jones
So i have been rather underwhelmed in the enthusiastic response to help out :-) So far only wendar and johnthetubaguy have signed up. I was hoping for at least 3-5 people to help with the initial triage. Please sign up this week if you can help and i’ll schedule the meetings starting next

Re: [openstack-dev] [All] Fixed recent gate issues

2014-02-18 Thread Matthew Treinish
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 08:27:16PM +0100, Alan Pevec wrote: Hi John, thanks for the summary. I've noticed one more fall out from swiftclient update in Grenade jobs running on stable/havana changes e.g. http://logs.openstack.org/02/73402/1/check/check-grenade-dsvm/a5650ac/console.html ...

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] Meeting Tuesday February 18th at 19:00 UTC

2014-02-18 Thread Elizabeth Krumbach Joseph
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 2:39 PM, Elizabeth Krumbach Joseph l...@princessleia.com wrote: The OpenStack Infrastructure (Infra) team is hosting our weekly meeting tomorrow, Tuesday February 18th, at 19:00 UTC in #openstack-meeting Thanks to everyone who joined us, minutes and log available here:

Re: [openstack-dev] Db interaction: conductor vs objects vs apis

2014-02-18 Thread Russell Bryant
On 02/18/2014 01:22 PM, Pitucha, Stanislaw Izaak wrote: Hi all, I'm writing some new code which uses objects sent around by rpc. I got to implementing some new conductor methods and started wondering... what's the current recommended way of interacting with the database? Many seem to be

Re: [openstack-dev] Db interaction: conductor vs objects vs apis

2014-02-18 Thread Dan Smith
- fat model approach - put the db interaction in objects If it's just DB interaction, then yes, in the object for sure. - put the db interactions in the conductor itself There is a reasonable separation between using conductor for mechanics (i.e. API deferring a long-running activity to

Re: [openstack-dev] Hierarchical Multitenancy and resource ownership

2014-02-18 Thread Vishvananda Ishaya
On Feb 18, 2014, at 11:31 AM, Martin, JC jch.mar...@gmail.com wrote: I see a lot of good things happening on the hierarchical multi tenancy proposal that Vish made a while back. However, the focus so far is on roles and quota but could not find any discussion related to resource

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] L7 - Update L7Policy

2014-02-18 Thread Stephen Balukoff
Hi! On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 12:18 AM, Samuel Bercovici samu...@radware.comwrote: Hi, It matters, as someone might need to “debug” the backend setup and the name, if exists, can add details. This obviously a vendor’s choice if they wish to push this back to backend but the API should

[openstack-dev] [cinder] Unit test cases failing with error 'cannot import rpcapi'

2014-02-18 Thread iKhan
Hi All, All cinder test cases are failing with error 'cannot import rpcapi', though same files work fine in live cinder setup. I wonder what's going wrong when unit testing is triggered. Can any one help me out here? -- Thanks, IK ___ OpenStack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [Murano] Need a new DSL for Murano

2014-02-18 Thread Georgy Okrokvertskhov
My observation has been that Murano has changed from a Windows focused Deployment Service to a Metadata Application Catalog Workflow thing (I fully admit this may be an invalid observation). It's unclear to me what OpenStack pain/use-cases is to be solved by complex object composition,

Re: [openstack-dev] VPC Proposal

2014-02-18 Thread Joe Gordon
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 10:03 AM, Martin, JC jch.mar...@gmail.com wrote: There was a lot of emails on that thread, but I am not seeing the discussion converging. I would like to reiterate my concerns: - We are trying to implement an API on a feature that is not supported by openstack I

Re: [openstack-dev] [savanna] renaming: initial voting

2014-02-18 Thread Sergey Lukjanov
The voting is ended, you can ding results here - http://civs.cs.cornell.edu/cgi-bin/results.pl?num_winners=10id=E_5dd4f18fde38ce8ealgorithm=beatpath So, the new name options for more detailed discussion are: 1. Gravity (Condorcet winner: wins contests with all other choices) 2. Sahara loses to

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Meetup Summary

2014-02-18 Thread Dugger, Donald D
Sylvain- As you can tell from the meeting today the scheduler sub-group is really not the gantt group meeting, I try to make sure that messages for things like the agenda and what not include both `gantt' and `scheduler' in the subject so it's clear we're talking about the same thing. Note

Re: [openstack-dev] [Solum] Regarding language pack database schema

2014-02-18 Thread Paul Montgomery
Maybe a crazy idea butŠ What if we simply don't store the JSON blob data for M1 instead of putting storing it in a way we don't like long term? This way, there is no need to remember to change something later even though a bug could be created anyways. I believe the fields that would be

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] Unit test cases failing with error 'cannot import rpcapi'

2014-02-18 Thread John Griffith
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 1:21 PM, iKhan ik.ibadk...@gmail.com wrote: Hi All, All cinder test cases are failing with error 'cannot import rpcapi', though same files work fine in live cinder setup. I wonder what's going wrong when unit testing is triggered. Can any one help me out here? --

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] L7 - Update L7Policy

2014-02-18 Thread Eugene Nikanorov
Hi folks, I see little value in being able to debug such things because it is for developers only. However given that such choice doesn't affect workflow and public API, we can add corresponding calls to the driver API. Thanks, Eugene. On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 12:20 AM, Stephen Balukoff

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Meetup Summary

2014-02-18 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 2/18/2014 1:12 PM, Russell Bryant wrote: On 02/18/2014 12:36 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: 4) We talked about Nova's integration with Neutron and made some good progress. We came up with a blueprint (ideally for Icehouse) to improve Nova-Neutron interaction. There are two cases we need to

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] Unit test cases failing with error 'cannot import rpcapi'

2014-02-18 Thread iKhan
Yes I do run in venv, I'm checking for missing libraries. On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 2:03 AM, John Griffith john.griff...@solidfire.comwrote: On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 1:21 PM, iKhan ik.ibadk...@gmail.com wrote: Hi All, All cinder test cases are failing with error 'cannot import rpcapi',

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] L7 data types

2014-02-18 Thread Stephen Balukoff
A couple quick suggestions (additions): Entity: L7Rule o Attribute: type § Possible values: - HTTP_METHOD o Attribute: compare_type § Possible values: - GT (greater than) - LT (less than) - GE (greater than or equal to) - LE (less than or equal to) Will we

Re: [openstack-dev] [Solum] Regarding language pack database schema

2014-02-18 Thread Georgy Okrokvertskhov
That is exactly option #2 which propose to store attributes in columns. So there will be a limited set of attributes and each of them will have its own column in a table. Thanks Georgy On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 10:55 AM, Paul Montgomery paul.montgom...@rackspace.com wrote: Maybe a crazy idea

Re: [openstack-dev] VPC Proposal

2014-02-18 Thread Martin, JC
Joe, See my comments in line. On Feb 18, 2014, at 12:26 PM, Joe Gordon joe.gord...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 10:03 AM, Martin, JC jch.mar...@gmail.com wrote: There was a lot of emails on that thread, but I am not seeing the discussion converging. I would like to reiterate my

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] L7 data types

2014-02-18 Thread Stephen Balukoff
Oh! One thing I forgot to mention below: On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 11:55 PM, Avishay Balderman avish...@radware.comwrote: Entity: L7Rule Field : compare_type Description: The way we compare the value against a given value Possible values: REG_EXP, EQ, GT, LT,EQ_IGNORE_CASE,(?) *Note*:

Re: [openstack-dev] VPC Proposal

2014-02-18 Thread Harshad Nakil
1. Feature is giving AWS VPC api compatibility with existing openstack structure 2. It does give full AWS compatibility (except for network ACL which was differed). Shared networks, FIP within scope of VPC is not some thing AWS provides. So it is not partial support. 3. IMO it would not be major

Re: [openstack-dev] Hierarchical Multitenancy and resource ownership

2014-02-18 Thread Martin, JC
Vish, See comments below. JC On Feb 18, 2014, at 12:19 PM, Vishvananda Ishaya vishvana...@gmail.com wrote: On Feb 18, 2014, at 11:31 AM, Martin, JC jch.mar...@gmail.com wrote: I see a lot of good things happening on the hierarchical multi tenancy proposal that Vish made a while back.

  1   2   >