Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] WAN bouncing at boot

On 08/09/2014 04:13 AM, Weedy wrote: On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 3:31 PM, Weedy weedy2...@gmail.com wrote: Is there anything I can do to stop this? It started sometime in the last 6months of trunk. Right after this and couple minutes after boot my healing script fires and detects that WAN is

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] build failure for Asus WL-500GP

On 08/28/2014 12:10 PM, Peter Münster wrote: Hi, With latest git version, there is a build failure: --8---cut here---start-8--- find /home/peter/soft/wl-500gp/build_dir/target-mipsel_mips32_uClibc-0.9.33.2/linux-brcm47xx_generic/linux-3.14.16

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] fix the build dependencies for uhttpd and ustream-ssl

On 09/23/2014 09:36 AM, thomas.lan...@lantiq.com wrote: Hello, Hi Thomas, I have to reject my own patch, uhttpd includes the header from ustream unconditionally, so the build dependency has to stay. Can't you patch uhhtpd to conditionally include the header? Would be something to

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] fix the build dependencies for uhttpd and ustream-ssl

On 09/29/2014 04:32 PM, thomas.lan...@lantiq.com wrote: Hello Bas, Hi Thomas, (...) My goal was to have the build dependencies reduced for the case no ssl is enabled. And that was fixed now with the help of Felix. It was never an issue that the libraries were included to the image.

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] fix the build dependencies for uhttpd and ustream-ssl

On 09/30/2014 03:22 PM, Felix Fietkau wrote: I'll repeat the point for clarity: There is no inclusion of unused libraries going on here - at least not in the image or package repositories. uhttpd always needs the header of ustream-ssl, but it does not link against the library directly (it

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] WPS patch set overlooked

Hi Lorenzo, Does this WPS patch set contain a way to mitigate the security design flaw? Reading the Wikipedia article (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wi-Fi_Protected_Setup#Security), it looks to me a compatible fix should be possible. Cheers, Bas. On 10/13/2012 01:39 PM, Lorenzo Cappelletti

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH 1/3] kernels: use ccache for modules too

On Wed, 03 Aug 2011 03:28:13 +, Daniel Mierswa wrote: KERNEL_MAKEOPTS := -C $(LINUX_DIR) \ - CROSS_COMPILE=$(KERNEL_CROSS) \ + CROSS_COMPILE=ccache $(KERNEL_CROSS) \ ARCH=$(LINUX_KARCH) \ KBUILD_HAVE_NLS=no \ CONFIG_SHELL=$(BASH) Is ccache mandatory

[OpenWrt-Devel] Patches to fix AVR32 and lk 2.6.25+ stuff

Please check https://dev.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/trac.fcgi/ticket/3755 for a fix for kmod-ebtables package not being built on 2.6.25+ kernels. Please check https://dev.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/trac.fcgi/ticket/3756 for a fix for a build error with kmod-i2c-core package on AVR32 2.6 kernels. This might

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Patches to fix AVR32 and lk 2.6.25+ stuff

Bas Mevissen wrote: Please check https://dev.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/trac.fcgi/ticket/3755 for a fix for kmod-ebtables package not being built on 2.6.25+ kernels. OK, comment here was the it would cause performance degradation. But is that also the case when the ebtables modules are not loaded

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] compression mode of jffs2

On Sun, 2010-02-07 at 18:00 +0100, Matthias Buecher / Germany wrote: How will this affect performance (the opposite side of compression)? If it does, then it would be great if this would be selectable and not hardcoded. Just my two cents Maddes On 07.02.2010 17:44, edgar.sol...@web.de

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] compression mode of jffs2

On Mon, 2010-02-08 at 11:25 +0100, edgar.sol...@web.de wrote: Any idea how to measure boot time? I don't have serial console access. ede some LED changing state, first respond to ping or wait for first broadcast packet from ethernet (e.g. arp, dhcp) with wireshark. Bas.

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] compression mode of jffs2

On Mon, 2010-02-08 at 11:32 +0100, Bastian Bittorf wrote: boottime should'nt be affected, because bootpartition is squashfs, Ah, I use jffs2 as root (and only) fs on my dev boards. only the writeable partition is jffs2. In theory i vote for default to size-optimization and make it

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] libconfig: update version to 1.4.2

On Sun, 2010-02-14 at 21:17 +0100, Mircea Gherzan wrote: The 1.4.0 tarball is no longer available upstream. (..) PKG_NAME:=libconfig -PKG_VERSION:=1.4 +PKG_VERSION:=1.4.2 PKG_RELEASE:=1 PKG_SOURCE:=$(PKG_NAME)-$(PKG_VERSION).tar.gz

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] 2mb flash not OpenWRT-Target?

On Fri, 2010-02-19 at 00:07 -0500, Stefan Monnier wrote: Linux can hardly fit in a 2MB flash device, once you have opened the Yes, but this text was written in the old times (2004?) I've been using OpenWRT on my WL-700gE for a while now. That machine has a 2MB flash, so OpenWRT is quite

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] 2mb flash not OpenWRT-Target?

On Fri, 2010-02-19 at 16:24 +0100, Benjamin Henrion wrote: The Asus WL520GC I just bought is running Linux. It has 2MB of flash. Wow, I assumed that out of the box, these devices with a small amount of flash did not run Linux. That was true in the past at least. Things have changed since I last

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Compiling outside of buildroot

On Fri, 2010-02-19 at 16:14 +0100, Felix Fietkau wrote: On 2010-02-19 2:53 PM, David Farrell wrote: (..) I just want to treat the OpenWrt system as a general purpose embedded linux box. Two possibilities: a) You read about how the Linux kernel is cross compiled, how to build external

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Compiling outside of buildroot

On 02/19/2010 08:08 PM, Felix Fietkau wrote: I disagree with the way manufacturers typically set up board support packages. Often you have to install something as root, which is annoying for people that only have user accounts on some machines. Often you can only have one globally installed

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Compiling outside of buildroot

On 02/21/2010 07:45 PM, Florian Fainelli wrote: Yes it is still supported and works well. It also contains a relocatable toolchain, so it doesn't matter where you unpack it. But it is only suitable for userspace software, iirc it does not ship with and is not capable of compiling the

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] dropbear: allow multiple listen ports to be configured

On Sun, 2010-02-28 at 11:30 +0100, Stijn Tintel wrote: On 28-02-10 11:28, Stijn Tintel wrote: This patch allows multiple listen ports to be configured for dropbear in /etc/config/dropbear. It renames the 'Port' option to 'Ports', so this will break existing configs. What looks more useful

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] dropbear: allow multiple listen ports to be configured

On Mon, 2010-03-01 at 15:22 +0100, Stijn Tintel wrote: Since the above suggestion is OK for me, I'd suggest to just forget this patch :-) The patch itself is useful if someone wants to explore the possibilities of dropbear. There is a difference between two instances and one instance which

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Backfire 10.03-beta

On Thu, 2010-03-04 at 11:27 +0100, edgar.sol...@web.de wrote: Highlights: * brcm-2.4 updated to 2.4.37 kernel why not recent 2.4.39, the 2.4 kernel doesn't have major changes anymore but some more bugfixes http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.4/ChangeLog-2.4.37.9

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Backfire 10.03-beta

On 03/05/2010 09:49 PM, Stefan Monnier wrote: Binaries can be downloaded at http://downloads.openwrt.org/backfire/10.03-beta/ Is there some equivalent Svn revision, branch, or the trunk rev-number from which it was branched? Looking at the .config files, it seems to be OpenWRT trunk (and

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] AR7240 switch // was: TP-Link TL-WR741ND: broadcasts on ethernet not reaching CPU

On Sat, 2010-03-13 at 18:31 +0100, Joerg Albert wrote: BTW, I get some garbled chars on TX (target - PC) from the WR741ND on the serial line. Both in bootloader and Linux system, so I guess it's a hardware problem (especially as the log in

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] External toolchain cannot find -lgcc_s

On Sat, 2010-03-13 at 22:22 -0500, Pawel Pastuszak wrote: Hi All, I am trying to split the toolchain out of my main openwrt build, after generating the toolchain i moved it to a new location from staging_dir/toolchain-powerpc_gcc-4.3.3_glibc-2.7 and set up and new build that points to the

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] AR7240 switch // was: TP-Link TL-WR741ND: broadcasts on ethernet not reaching CPU

On Mon, 2010-03-15 at 11:31 +0100, ulf kypke wrote: i'm still looking for a very good 3.3v serial adapter, the prolific is not the best one. Best trick is to cascade a MAX3232 level shifter with 3V3 power supply. It will raise the signal level to just over 5V. That is enough for the average

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [OpenWrt] #6812: kamikaze trunk can't start RB433AH

On Thu, 2010-03-18 at 16:25 +0800, Yongheng Qi wrote: anyone could tell me how to resolve the problem, I want NOT to change my kamikaze version. I used the kamikaze r19358. Then find the change that fixed the issue and patch your setup yourself. You cannot expect someone to fix your

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [OpenWrt] #6812: kamikaze trunk can't start RB433AH

On Fri, 2010-03-19 at 10:12 +0800, Yongheng Qi wrote: Thanks Bas , because kamikze trunk used linux kernel changed so faster. and my application depend on fixed kernel version. You can keep the kernel version stable and have the other stuff up to date. But that won't help if there is a

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] AR7240 switch // was: TP-Link TL-WR741ND: broadcasts on ethernet not reaching CPU

On Thu, 2010-03-18 at 23:04 +0100, Joerg Albert wrote: On 03/15/2010 09:33 AM, Bas Mevissen wrote: Do you have access to an oscilloscope? It might be that the signal level or signal shape is not perfect. I've seen mixed results with various serial to USB adapters too. I used

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] AR7240 switch // was: TP-Link TL-WR741ND: broadcasts on ethernet not reaching CPU

On Fri, 2010-03-19 at 16:56 +0100, Joerg Albert wrote: I looked closer at the PCB and it turned out that we have a voltage divider with two 5.6 kOhm to V_3_3 and GND (R613, R614) and a capacitor C496 (!) towards the CPU. The signal at the CPU looked fine for a 2.5V TTL. The voltage drift seen

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] mjpg-streamer and kernel crash again

On Fri, 2010-03-19 at 22:37 +0100, Kövesdi György wrote: Hi, At last i could create symbolic backtrace (attached). The hardware is an Asus WL500GP-V2, a 160 Gb HD (on USB), a UVC webcam (Logitech Quickcam Sphere). The commandline is: mjpg-streamer -i input_uvc.so -f 25 -r 320x240 -l off

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] mjpg-streamer and kernel crash again

On Mon, 2010-03-22 at 15:30 +0100, Kövesdi György wrote: Where is the output of mjpg-streamer written to? It looks like it is using ram disk or (slow) flash memory. Make sure it is on the hard disk. Sorry, i forgot to mention that there is a link: /data - /mnt/xxx/ which point to the HD.

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Optware refusal

On Thu, 2010-05-20 at 19:23 +0200, Benjamin Henrion wrote: It seems that the OpenWRT devs have entrenched views about optware packages: https://dev.openwrt.org/ticket/944 What's your reason for digging up a 4 year old ticket? Bas. ___

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Openwrt package installation order

On Mon, 31 May 2010 13:19:00 +0200, Filippo Sallemi tonyp...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, could someone explain how to change the order to install certain packages? I need to overwrite some configuration files, but the system overrides in alphabetical order. Use the files directory in your

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] LibreWRT introduction patch

On Mon, 19 Jul 2010 13:49:19 -0300, Antonio Grassi agras...@gmail.com wrote: It would be great if some OpenWRT developer could review it and send some feedback about the inclusion of this patch; probably there are things to be solved or improved before inclusion, so it would be great to hear

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] LibreWRT introduction patch

On Tue, 20 Jul 2010 10:53:19 -0300, Antonio Grassi agras...@gmail.com wrote: we tried a second approach, which is also included in the patch: instead of downloading deblobed kernel sources, we could deblob the vanilla kernel sources as part of the build process, making use of the deblobing

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] LibreWRT introduction patch

On Tue, 20 Jul 2010 17:37:50 +0200, Stefan Monnier monn...@iro.umontreal.ca wrote: In other words, I wonder why one would like to deblob. As long as you don't install the blobs in the image, you are not using it. So if you already downloaded it, what is the use of removing it above just not

[OpenWrt-Devel] Problem cross compiling gammu

Hi, I took some stuff from https://dev.openwrt.org/ticket/7649 to compile gammu for OpenWRT on AVR32. Most of it seems fine, but a few things fail: - The compilation needs cmake on the host, which is not checked for. OpenWRT does not provide support for cmake, but a host installed recent cmake

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Problem cross compiling gammu

On 08/16/2010 05:55 PM, Bas Mevissen wrote: Hi, I took some stuff from https://dev.openwrt.org/ticket/7649 to compile gammu for OpenWRT on AVR32. Most of it seems fine, but a few things fail: - The compilation needs cmake on the host, which is not checked for. OpenWRT does

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] WGT634U busted in trunk since mid-July

On Thu, 30 Sep 2010 21:05:21 -0700, Russell Senior russ...@personaltelco.net wrote: (...) but unfortunately, all the revisions I have tested after r22295 build okay but have failed to boot successfully. Currently, as of r23118, I lose the serial port very early in the boot, immediately after:

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] update shorewall-lite to 4.4.12.2

On Fri, 8 Oct 2010 12:13:52 + (UTC), Brian J. Murrell br...@interlinx.bc.ca wrote: Brian J. Murrell brian at interlinx.bc.ca writes: This simply updates shorewall-lite to the current 4.4.12.2 I saw neither an ACK nor a NAK, nor do I see any sign that this was committed. Was there a

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] iptables compile fix

On Wed, 06 Oct 2010 13:56:07 +0200, Maarten Bezemer m.m.beze...@utwente.nl wrote: For the 'Marvell Orion' target the iptables package does not compile. See forum topic: https://forum.openwrt.org/viewtopic.php?pid=117520 Maybe for other targets as well? In short: the problem is that

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] build error: mixed implicit and normal rules.

On Sun, 7 Nov 2010 09:51:13 -0800, Chris Li open...@chrisli.org wrote: On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 5:05 AM, Jo-Philipp Wich x...@subsignal.org wrote: Both please. Here is the patch for the busybox sub tree. I haven't make it a patch in openwrt so that it will automatically apply when compile.

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] iptables compile fix

On Mon, 15 Nov 2010 22:45:48 +0100, Maarten Bezemer m.m.beze...@utwente.nl wrote: On Mon, 2010-11-15 at 12:08 +0100, Bas Mevissen wrote: I guess something is wrong with your build environment. Clean it up and please try again. I did (of course), several times in fact. After reading your

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] iptables compile fix

(keeping the list in the loop) On Tue, 2010-11-16 at 10:56 +0100, Bas Mevissen wrote: On Mon, 15 Nov 2010 22:45:48 +0100, Maarten Bezemer m.m.beze...@utwente.nl wrote: On Mon, 2010-11-15 at 12:08 +0100, Bas Mevissen wrote: I just did a build on backfire (revision 14012) for Orion (while

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] Add CMake host tool support

On Thu, 18 Nov 2010 13:37:25 +0100, Jan Willies j...@willies.info wrote: Hi Bas, 2010/11/17 Bas Mevissen The attached patch against trunk adds CMake host tool support. Thanks for your patch, I hope we can finally update Weechat (which kinda depends on cmake) to something recent. I

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] Add CMake host tool support

On Thu, 18 Nov 2010 14:32:36 +0100, Jan Willies j...@willies.info wrote: The CFLAGS from target/linux/kirkwood/Makefile are overriding include/host-build.mk [3]. So removing include $(INCLUDE_DIR)/target.mk [4] from tools/cmake/Makefile did it for me. Did you include it on purpose? Ah,

[OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] Add CMake host tool support [V2]

Hi all, The attached patch against trunk adds CMake host tool support. When CONFIG_CMAKE is set in .config, the CMake tools will be build and installed in staging_dir/host/bin. To enable CONFIG_CMAKE, select Advanced configuration options (for developers) in the main menu and select Build CMake

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] Add CMake host tool support

On 11/18/2010 06:53 PM, Jan Willies wrote: Unfortunately cmake picks up the host-gcc: (cd /var/tmp/swjawill/openwrt-dockstar/build_dir/target-arm_v5te_uClibc-0.9.30.1_eabi/weechat-0.3.3; /var/tmp/swjawill/openwrt-dockstar/staging_dir/host/bin/cmake . || exit 1 ); -- The C compiler

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] iptables compile fix

On Mon, 22 Nov 2010 11:51:22 +0100, Maarten Bezemer m.m.beze...@utwente.nl wrote: Gr... Whatever I try it compiles now (even my own .config works)... Weird since there is nothing changed to the iptables package lately (or related things?). Only change I can think of is the update to Kubuntu

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] iptables compile fix

On Tue, 23 Nov 2010 10:49:52 +0100, Maarten Bezemer m.m.beze...@utwente.nl wrote: Hi, I found the problem (compile errors are back): When building everything from scratch with make -j 9 iptables does not compile. When building (with same .config file) without -j it builds fine. I

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Re-compiling released OpenWrt versions

On Fri, 2011-03-04 at 11:05 +0100, Mark Vels wrote: Please add at least a revision number in feeds.conf for anything else than bleeding edge! Time to grow up! Yes, IMHO every OpenWRT tag and preferably every branch should contain a feeds.conf file with revision numbers set for the trees it

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] OpenWrt Summit CFP

On 03/10/2017 02:21, Valent Turkovic wrote: Why is http://www.openwrtsummit.org/ down for over 24h? Site looks fine for me. Bas. ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Moving the mailing lists

On 23/05/18 17:55, Arjen de Korte wrote: Citeren Torbjörn Jansson : (...) But one thing that is a little anoying after the move is that for some mails I get same thing twice and I'm not sure why. Most likely because people are still cross-posting to

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH lede-17.01 2/4] mbedtls: Activate the session cache

On 02/06/18 18:10, Hauke Mehrtens wrote: This make sit possible to store informations about a session and reuse it later. When used by a server it increases the time to create a new TLS session from about 1 second to less than 0.1 seconds. ...it *decreases* the time to... The size of the

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Boot Time Reduction

On 12/04/18 06:26, Arjav Parikh wrote: Hi, > (...) Now as mentioned in previous mail only at that two locations I see some process consuming lot of time. Is it possible to reduce the time consumed by the process? Isn't the long time between pre-init and ubi mount due to the lengthy

[OpenWrt-Devel] Errors running make xconfig

Hi all, I'm trying to configure my openwrt project with xconfig. This fails with the errors pasted to https://pastebin.com/LJvsAhab (too long to add, summary below). System is Mint 9.2 (Ubuntu Bionic based) with relevant Qt5 stuff installed, including libqt5* (I installed all of them...)

Re: A proposal of https certificate assignment system for luci

On 2020-10-04 15:48, abnoeh wrote: Few months ago there was some debate for how we handle certificate for luci page: make user to click though certificate warning is not that great for security so here is a  proposal for autometically assign a worldwide unique subdomain and how to make valid

Re: A proposal of https certificate assignment system for luci

On 2020-10-09 14:33, abnoeh wrote: 20. 10. 9. 오후 8:29에 Bas Mevissen 이(가) 쓴 글: So I think it is reasonably safe to do the initial setup over HTTP (without the "S") at the first boot if there are no certificates available from a previous OpenWRT install. Then the user can setup th

Re: Fate of kernel 4.19

On 2020-10-09 14:19, Adrian Schmutzler wrote: Hi all, in master, we currently support kernels 5.4 and 4.19. All targets build with 5.4 by default, In other words: 4.19 is no longer required. so 4.19 is just there and can theoretically be used for regression testing In that case, one can

Re: A proposal of https certificate assignment system for luci

On 2020-10-11 00:58, Michael Richardson wrote: Bas Mevissen wrote: > A security conscious user/administrator would install a router without any > untrusted computers connected to the LAN side and setup the device properly > before allowing others to connect. The

Re: ipq806x: add support for TP-Link Talon AD7200

On 2020-10-12 01:09, Paul Fertser wrote: From: Gary Cooper Device hardware: https://deviwiki.com/wiki/TP-LINK_AD7200_(Talon) The Talon AD7200 is basically an Archer C2600 with larger flash, a third PCIe lane and an 802.11ad radio. It comes in a different housing reminiscent of the Archers

Re: ipq806x: add support for TP-Link Talon AD7200

On 2020-10-12 11:40, Bjørn Mork wrote: Bas Mevissen writes: Nice work, but does it make sense to add a device that is already EOL'ed by the manufacturer? I guess the installed base is also rather small. Definitely! IMHO, it should me enough that there is one user with enough interest

Re: ipq806x: add support for TP-Link Talon AD7200

On 2020-10-12 12:46, Daniel Golle wrote: On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 11:59:17AM +0200, Bas Mevissen wrote: On 2020-10-12 11:40, Bjørn Mork wrote: > Bas Mevissen writes: > > > Nice work, but does it make sense to add a device that is already > > EOL'ed by the manufacturer? I g

Re: Hostapd throwing warnings

On 2020-10-15 19:45, Philip Prindeville wrote: On Oct 15, 2020, at 11:32 AM, Daniel Golle wrote: On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 11:18:24AM -0600, Philip Prindeville wrote: Hi, I have a WLE600VX card in an APU4 running HEAD as of a week ago. My /etc/config/wireless file is straightforward: config

Re: Transform OpenWRT to a Yocto / openembedded layer

On 2020-07-30 11:15, m...@adrianschmutzler.de wrote: -Original Message- From: Bas Mevissen [mailto:ab...@basmevissen.nl] Sent: Donnerstag, 30. Juli 2020 10:54 To: Thomas Petazzoni Cc: m...@adrianschmutzler.de; openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org Subject: Transform OpenWRT to a Yocto

Re: [PATCH] ramips: add support for TOTOLINK X5000R

Hi, On 3/13/21 3:21 AM, Chuanhong Guo wrote: Hi! On Sat, Mar 13, 2021 at 7:27 AM Bas Mevissen wrote: Hi, Thanks for creating this patch. Got my X5000R today. Before flashing it to OpenWRT, can you please tell me whether you (or anyone else) did performance measurements with the original

Re: [PATCH] ramips: add support for TOTOLINK X5000R

Hi, Thanks for creating this patch. Got my X5000R today. Before flashing it to OpenWRT, can you please tell me whether you (or anyone else) did performance measurements with the original and the OpenWRT firmware? I measured over 600mbit/s with WPA3 when on my desk, next to a notebook with

Re: Quilt and cutting down diff position lines

On 2021-02-24 15:36, Adrian Schmutzler wrote: -Original Message- From: Adrian Schmutzler [mailto:m...@adrianschmutzler.de] Sent: Mittwoch, 24. Februar 2021 11:50 To: 'openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org' Subject: Quilt and cutting down diff position lines Hi, as most are probably aware,

Host dependencies and checking them

Hi all, When starting a clean build (21.02 branch) on a clean Fedora 33 machine, I ran into the small issue of tools/autoconf failing to build. This was due to perl-File-Compare missing. I apparently missed that prerequisite. After installing said package, everything built fine. Looking

Error compiling master on WSL2 Ubuntu 20.04

/WINDOWS/System32/WindowsPowerShell/v1.0/:/mnt/c/WINDOWS/System32/OpenSSH/:/mnt/c/Users/Bas Mevissen/AppData/Local/Microsoft/WindowsApps:/mnt/c/Users/Bas Mevissen/.dotnet/tools It contains /mnt/c/Program Files/dotnet/ and other unquoted paths with spaces. I would have expected them to be qu

Re: Error compiling master on WSL2 Ubuntu 20.04

5, Alberto Bursi wrote: On 07/06/21 22:35, Bas Mevissen via openwrt-devel wrote: It contains /mnt/c/Program Files/dotnet/ and other unquoted paths with spaces. I would have expected them to be quoted or escaped, but none of them seems to be the case. (and shortening the path to a usual Linux

[FIX proposal] Build error of host mklibs pkg of openwrt-19.07 branch on Fedora 34

The sender domain has a DMARC Reject/Quarantine policy which disallows sending mailing list messages using the original "From" header. To mitigate this problem, the original message has been wrapped automatically by the mailing list software.--- Begin Message --- (resent as previous attempt

Re: [PATCH 19.07] tools/mklibs: Fix compile with GCC 11

The sender domain has a DMARC Reject/Quarantine policy which disallows sending mailing list messages using the original "From" header. To mitigate this problem, the original message has been wrapped automatically by the mailing list software.--- Begin Message --- On 2021-05-16 23:57, Hauke

[FIX proposal] Build error of host mklibs pkg of openwrt-19.07 branch on Fedora 34

The sender domain has a DMARC Reject/Quarantine policy which disallows sending mailing list messages using the original "From" header. To mitigate this problem, the original message has been wrapped automatically by the mailing list software.--- Begin Message --- Hi all, The g++ version

[Q] [master][openwrt-21.02] Check on 'which' in include/prereq-build.mk fails for Fedora 34 since recently, how to fix?

The sender domain has a DMARC Reject/Quarantine policy which disallows sending mailing list messages using the original "From" header. To mitigate this problem, the original message has been wrapped automatically by the mailing list software.--- Begin Message --- tldr; A recent upgrade of the

Re: Flagship AX routers

The sender domain has a DMARC Reject/Quarantine policy which disallows sending mailing list messages using the original "From" header. To mitigate this problem, the original message has been wrapped automatically by the mailing list software.--- Begin Message --- On 5/18/21 11:52 PM, Philip

Re: [PATCH] ath79: rb4xx-nand: fix 512 byte pages compatibility

The sender domain has a DMARC Reject/Quarantine policy which disallows sending mailing list messages using the original "From" header. To mitigate this problem, the original message has been wrapped automatically by the mailing list software.--- Begin Message --- A few nitpicks: On 2021-05-28

Re: [PATCH] ath79: rb4xx-nand: fix 512 byte pages compatibility

55, Sergey Ryazanov wrote: Hello Bas, thank you for your review, please find my comments below. On Fri, May 28, 2021 at 11:41 AM Bas Mevissen wrote: On 2021-05-28 00:27, Sergey Ryazanov wrote: [skipped] +static int rb4xx_nand_attach_chip(struct nand_chip *chip) +{ + struct mtd_info *mtd = n

Re: [PATCH] Extend checks on build prerequisites for building OpenWRT core

0 AM, Paul Spooren wrote: On 4/20/21 1:08 AM, Bas Mevissen wrote: OpenWRT requires a number of Perl modules to be installed. It wasn't checking on all of them. This patch adds checks for Perl FindBin, File::Copy, File::Compare and Thread::Queue modules. Failing to install these, will have the b

Re: [PATCH] Extend checks on build prerequisites for building OpenWRT core

re checked on forehand. Tested on a Fedora 33 and 34 (beta) that was freshly installed. Fedora appears to break up Perl modules into small packages that need to be installed for the build to succeed. Signed-off-by: Bas Mevissen --- include/prereq-build.mk | 13 - 1 file changed, 12 insert

Re: [PATCH] Extend checks on build prerequisites for building OpenWRT core

. On 2021-04-29 22:39, Bas Mevissen wrote: On 4/29/21 11:40 AM, Paul Spooren wrote: On 4/20/21 1:08 AM, Bas Mevissen wrote: OpenWRT requires a number of Perl modules to be installed. It wasn't checking on all of them. This patch adds checks for Perl FindBin, File::Copy, File::Compare and Thr

Re: OpenWrt 21.02-rc1

The sender domain has a DMARC Reject/Quarantine policy which disallows sending mailing list messages using the original "From" header. To mitigate this problem, the original message has been wrapped automatically by the mailing list software.--- Begin Message --- On 4/7/21 12:29 AM, Hauke

Re: OpenWrt 21.02-rc1

0:07, John Crispin wrote: On 07.04.21 12:16, Bas Mevissen via openwrt-devel wrote: Will Wifi 6 support be added to the interface? We have some support for a couple of AX routers, so it would be nice if they can work without manually tweaking things. The underlying structure seems to support it alre

[PATCH] Extend checks on build prerequisites for building OpenWRT core

re checked on forehand. Tested on a Fedora 33 and 34 (beta) that was freshly installed. Fedora appears to break up Perl modules into small packages that need to be installed for the build to succeed. Signed-off-by: Bas Mevissen --- include/prereq-build.mk | 13 - 1 file changed, 12 insert

Re: [PATCH] base-files: add option to make /var persistent

The sender domain has a DMARC Reject/Quarantine policy which disallows sending mailing list messages using the original "From" header. To mitigate this problem, the original message has been wrapped automatically by the mailing list software.--- Begin Message --- On 8/7/21 10:40 AM, Stijn

Re: ar71xx: rb941-2nd support

The sender domain has a DMARC Reject/Quarantine policy which disallows sending mailing list messages using the original "From" header. To mitigate this problem, the original message has been wrapped automatically by the mailing list software.--- Begin Message --- On 2021-10-11 10:31, Bjoern

Re: ar71xx: rb941-2nd support

The sender domain has a DMARC Reject/Quarantine policy which disallows sending mailing list messages using the original "From" header. To mitigate this problem, the original message has been wrapped automatically by the mailing list software.--- Begin Message --- On 2021-10-11 10:31, Bjoern

Re: [RFC] Stop providing binary package updates for release builds?

The sender domain has a DMARC Reject/Quarantine policy which disallows sending mailing list messages using the original "From" header. To mitigate this problem, the original message has been wrapped automatically by the mailing list software.--- Begin Message --- On 2021-12-12 20:42, Jo-Philipp

Re: [PATCH] toolchain/gcc: set dialects for each version

The sender domain has a DMARC Reject/Quarantine policy which disallows sending mailing list messages using the original "From" header. To mitigate this problem, the original message has been wrapped automatically by the mailing list software.--- Begin Message --- On 1/25/22 18:02, Stijn Tintel

Re: OpenWrt 21.02.3 Third service release

The sender domain has a DMARC Reject/Quarantine policy which disallows sending mailing list messages using the original "From" header. To mitigate this problem, the original message has been wrapped automatically by the mailing list software.--- Begin Message --- On 2022-04-21 00:21, Hauke

Re: [sdwalker/sdwalker.github.io] 2bdb42: This week's update

The sender domain has a DMARC Reject/Quarantine policy which disallows sending mailing list messages using the original "From" header. To mitigate this problem, the original message has been wrapped automatically by the mailing list software.--- Begin Message --- On 13/05/2022 01:59, Sergey

Re: [PATCH] build: always set CONFIG_IPV6

The sender domain has a DMARC Reject/Quarantine policy which disallows sending mailing list messages using the original "From" header. To mitigate this problem, the original message has been wrapped automatically by the mailing list software.--- Begin Message --- On 8/18/22 20:32, Robert Marko

Re: DSA Terminology

The sender domain has a DMARC Reject/Quarantine policy which disallows sending mailing list messages using the original "From" header. To mitigate this problem, the original message has been wrapped automatically by the mailing list software.--- Begin Message --- On 2022-09-13 21:56, Jo-Philipp

Re: mt7621 GPIO mapping mystery

The sender domain has a DMARC Reject/Quarantine policy which disallows sending mailing list messages using the original "From" header. To mitigate this problem, the original message has been wrapped automatically by the mailing list software.--- Begin Message --- On 2023-01-21 22:42, Lukas

Re: [PATCH] x86: use mkfs.fat, sed, mmd and mcopy from staging_dir

The sender domain has a DMARC Reject/Quarantine policy which disallows sending mailing list messages using the original "From" header. To mitigate this problem, the original message has been wrapped automatically by the mailing list software.--- Begin Message --- On 2023-01-20 13:24, Florian

Re: OpenWrt One - celebrating 20 years of OpenWrt

The sender domain has a DMARC Reject/Quarantine policy which disallows sending mailing list messages using the original "From" header. To mitigate this problem, the original message has been wrapped automatically by the mailing list software.--- Begin Message --- On 2024-01-17 16:21, John

Re: OpenWrt One - celebrating 20 years of OpenWrt

The sender domain has a DMARC Reject/Quarantine policy which disallows sending mailing list messages using the original "From" header. To mitigate this problem, the original message has been wrapped automatically by the mailing list software.--- Begin Message --- On 09/01/2024 11:49, John

Re: OpenWrt One - celebrating 20 years of OpenWrt

The sender domain has a DMARC Reject/Quarantine policy which disallows sending mailing list messages using the original "From" header. To mitigate this problem, the original message has been wrapped automatically by the mailing list software.--- Begin Message --- On 2024-02-27

Re: OpenWrt One - celebrating 20 years of OpenWrt

The sender domain has a DMARC Reject/Quarantine policy which disallows sending mailing list messages using the original "From" header. To mitigate this problem, the original message has been wrapped automatically by the mailing list software.--- Begin Message --- On 2024-02-26 22:38, Paul D

Re: [PATCH 3/3] arm64: dts: mediatek: Add OpenWrt One

The sender domain has a DMARC Reject/Quarantine policy which disallows sending mailing list messages using the original "From" header. To mitigate this problem, the original message has been wrapped automatically by the mailing list software.--- Begin Message --- On 27/05/2024 13:59, Rafał

  1   2   >