[opnfv-tech-discuss] Daisy4nfv build

Hi, You should perhaps think of doing your builds in containers. Our build servers have docker installed. Ps. changed the subject. /Fatih On 11 Oct 2016, at 06:15, "sun.jin...@zte.com.cn" mailto:sun.jin...@zte.com.cn>> wrote: Hi

[opnfv-tech-discuss] 答复: Daisy4nfv build

Hi: DO you mean that we launch a container in our build script and build daisy4nfv within the container? Thank you. Best regards, JingSun Fatih Degirmenci 2016/10/11 15:23 收件人 "sun.jin...@zte.com.cn" , 抄送 "opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org" 主题 Daisy4nfv build Hi,

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] 答复: Daisy4nfv build

Hi, Yes. This is done by some other projects and they have control over their build process/needed packages. kvm and fuel are examples. /Fatih From: "sun.jin...@zte.com.cn" Date: Tuesday, 11 October 2016 at 09:31 To: Fatih Degirmenci Cc: "opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org" Subject: 答复: Dais

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Announcing the 2016 TSC Chair election result

Congratulations! Looking forward to working with you~ 发自我的 iPhone > 在 2016年10月10日，下午2:06，Raymond Paik 写道： > > All, > > I'm happy to officially announce that Tapio Tallgren (Nokia) has been elected > as the new TSC Chair for OPNFV. Tapio will run the TSC meeting starting on > October 11th.

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [Fuel] Tuesday's casual meeting

Hello Fuel team. I have question about our Tuesday's meeting. What is your vision of it? Should it be formal meeting (i.e. sync-up) or just time-slot when most of active people will be available in IRC and ready for discussion? In the first case I'll need to propose to move it for an hour earlier (

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [qtip] weekly meeting agenda

Dear qtip followers, Please find the agenda for tomorrow's weekly meeting. Feel free to add new topics to https://etherpad.opnfv.org/p/qtip-meetings-2016-10-12 QTIP meeting 2016-10-12 previous: https://etherpad.opnfv.org/p/qtip-meetings-2016-09-28 irc://#opnfv-qtip@freenode Action followup -

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Fuel] Tuesday's casual meeting

Hi, I'd vote for a best-effort IRC meeting. Cheers, Stefan Från: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org för Fedor Zhadaev Skickat: den 11 oktober 2016 10:53 Till: MichalSkalski , yunhong.ji...@linux.intel.com , opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org Ämne: [

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [SFC] weekly meeting agenda: Fast Data Stacks intro, Oct 12

In this weeks' meeting, Frank Brockners will present the OPNFV Fast Data Stacks project with the intention of helping us integrate Fast Data Stacks with OPNFV SFC. The main goal of the OPNFV Fast Data Stacks project is to integrate OpenStack with the FD.io VPP virtual switch. FD.io is an alt

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Fuel] Tuesday's casual meeting

Hi, I vote for casual meeting. Michal > On 11 Oct 2016, at 11:17, Stefan Berg K wrote: > > Hi, > > I'd vote for a best-effort IRC meeting. > > Cheers, > > Stefan > > Från: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org > för Fedor Zhadaev > > Skickat: den 11 oktober 2016 10:53 > Till: Micha

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Fuel] Tuesday's casual meeting

Hi, +1 for casual meeting > -Original Message- > From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org [mailto:opnfv-tech- > discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Michal Skalski > Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2016 12:39 PM > To: Fedor Zhadaev > Cc: MichalSkalski , yunhong.ji...@linux.inte

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Fuel] Tuesday's casual meeting

Hello, +1 for casual meeting. Regards, PEter. From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org on behalf of Alexandru Avadanii Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2016 11:49:33 AM To: Michal Skalski; Fedor Zhadaev Cc: MichalSkalski , yunhong.ji...@linux.intel.com

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [netready] NetReady weekly project meeting

BEGIN:VCALENDAR METHOD:REQUEST PRODID:Microsoft Exchange Server 2010 VERSION:2.0 BEGIN:VTIMEZONE TZID:W. Europe Standard Time BEGIN:STANDARD DTSTART:16010101T03 TZOFFSETFROM:+0200 TZOFFSETTO:+0100 RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;INTERVAL=1;BYDAY=-1SU;BYMONTH=10 END:STANDARD BEGIN:DAYLIGHT DTSTART:16010101T02

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [SFC] stepping down as committer

Please remove me as a committer on the SFC project. Thanks, --Tom ___ opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [SFC] stepping down as committer

Tom, Thanks for all your help in the past. I'll take care of the details of this. Regards, Brady On 11/10/16 13:52, Tom Nadeau wrote: Please remove me as a committer on the SFC project. Thanks, --Tom ___ opnfv-tech-disc

[opnfv-tech-discuss] Jose Lausuch is the New Functest PTL

Hi TSC, I would like to inform that the Functest project elected this morning his new PTL. We just applied the recommendations we voted in Functest (https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/functest/Functest+admin) Jose - you all know him - will take the lead of the project. He has been very active in

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Jose Lausuch is the New Functest PTL

Congratulations Jose. Sent from my iPhone > On Oct 11, 2016, at 14:00, > wrote: > > Hi TSC, > > I would like to inform that the Functest project elected this morning > his new PTL. > > We just applied the recommendations we voted in Functest > (https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/functest/Functe

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Fuel] Tuesday's casual meeting

Well, As I got no objections today's meeting will be informal. I'll wait for another opinions till next Tuesday, and if don't get them will assume that everyone agree with such solution. Thanks for voting! On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 1:03 PM Peter Barabas wrote: > Hello, > > > > +1 for casual meetin

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Jose Lausuch is the New Functest PTL

Hi, Thanks Morgan and thank the Functest committers for trusting me on having this role, which I am honored to take. I will put all my energy and try to lead the project as good as Morgan has done so far to help it evolve and progress according to our expectative for the coming release. Danube

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [polestar] Skipping this week's call for Bin's Technical discussions call. Will resume Oct - 20, thursday

-- Margaret Chiosi ___ opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail]dovetail weekly meeting minutes 9/30

Hello Hongbo, I see that Chris and myself were both absent last week. For my part, I was at an event and had difficulties joining. I also notice that one item outstanding from the previous week was not discussed, and I would like to make progress on that issue this week. We agree that we should

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail]dovetail weekly meeting minutes 9/30

Apologies - replied to the wrong meeting minutes email. The email I replied to was where this task was documented as a priority work item. Thanks, Dave. On 10/11/2016 12:44 PM, Dave Neary wrote: > Hello Hongbo, > > I see that Chris and myself were both absent last week. For my part, I > was at a

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail]dovetail weekly meeting minutes 9/30

Hi Dave Were you trying to reply to the dovetail agenda email or the minutes email? In either case, the topic of finalizing test case criteria was listed. In last week's call, because of low attendance, we didn't take on any meaty subject, and focused on reviewing what we needed improvement arou

[opnfv-tech-discuss] Notes from the October OPNFV Board meeting

All, I'm sending this on behalf of Prodip (Board Chair) who is traveling this week... Below are notes from the Board meeting on October 6th. Please let me/Prodip know if you have any questions. - C&C committee update: There was an update on the Compliance/Verification Program (CVP) and th

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail]dovetail weekly meeting minutes 9/30

Hi Wenjing, On 10/11/2016 01:05 PM, Wenjing Chu wrote: > Were you trying to reply to the dovetail agenda email or the minutes email? > > In either case, the topic of finalizing test case criteria was listed. In > last week's call, because of low attendance, we didn't take on any meaty > subject

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Fuel] Tuesday's casual meeting

Fedor – the early intentions was like it say – just casual, no meeting bot, no real need for some one to drive it, PTL and other’s participation optional – but rather a timeslot where as many of us that can – meet-up in IRC. So I think this vote/your interpretation is aligned with the original i

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Jose Lausuch is the New Functest PTL

Morgan - first my deep respect on what you and your PTL has been able to achieve during the past three rivers - awesome! Next - Jose congratulations! D-F is all your rivers with your team! BR/Jonas -Original Message- From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org [mailto:opnfv-tech-dis

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Jose Lausuch is the New Functest PTL

Should of course have been " you and your team", nothing else. BR/Jonas -Original Message- From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org [mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Jonas Bjurel Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2016 11:10 PM To: morgan.richo...@orange.com

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [opnfv-project-leads] [opnfvdocs] Documentation updates for Colorado 2.0

Adding to Sofia's point, please be aware that any documentation built for the Colorado 2.0 release will end up in a different OPNFV artifacts name-space. This means that links have to be reviewed and verified. And in many case this means a complete new docs set for the projects - as the name-spa

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] congress support in compass4nfv

OK, I got all your needs now. I also understand congress is an important component and agree that it should be appear in all scenarios. We are making some adjustment about our ansible now and I will suggest to add congress into the common part. Compass4nfv support offline installation so now I a