Re: [OPSAWG]  WG LC: Export of Segment Routing over IPv6 Information in IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX)

Hi Benoit, Yes, that is fine with me. Regards, Rob From: Benoit Claise Sent: 16 December 2022 10:13 To: Joe Clarke (jclarke) ; opsawg@ietf.org; Rob Wilton (rwilton) Subject: Re: [OPSAWG]  WG LC: Export of Segment Routing over IPv6 Information in IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX) Hi Rob

Re: [OPSAWG]  WG LC: Export of Segment Routing over IPv6 Information in IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX)

Hi Rob, Do we get the green light to request the IANA early allocation [https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc7120#section-2] since there are multiple implementations already? Regards, Benoit On 12/15/2022 9:32 PM, Joe Clarke (jclarke) wrote: Closing this WG LC out.  A great deal of

Re: [OPSAWG]  WG LC: Export of Segment Routing over IPv6 Information in IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX)

Closing this WG LC out. A great deal of support has been expressed for this work, and the chairs appreciate the attention to not only IANA but working implementations. This draft will move forward to the IESG. However, we NEED a shepherd. I personally don’t feel comfortable shepherding this

Re: [OPSAWG]  WG LC: Export of Segment Routing over IPv6 Information in IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX)

I support publication. The IETF 115 hackathon is a great data point on development of interoperability of implementations. Thanks Gyan On Wed, Nov 30, 2022 at 8:54 AM Joe Clarke (jclarke) wrote: > Hello, WG. As discussed at IETF 115, we want to conduct a WG LC for >

Re: [OPSAWG]  WG LC: Export of Segment Routing over IPv6 Information in IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX)

Hi, I support progressing to the next stage with this document. As expressed before, it addresses interesting aspects for IPFIX, already demonstrated in practice. Be goode, -- “Esta vez no fallaremos, Doctor Infierno” Dr Diego R. Lopez Telefonica I+D https://www.linkedin.com/dr2lopez/

Re: [OPSAWG]  WG LC: Export of Segment Routing over IPv6 Information in IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX)

Hi I support the WGLC for this draft. The draft introduces a set of new interesting IPFIX IE for SRv6. Cheers, Ahmed From: OPSAWG mailto:opsawg-boun...@ietf.org>> On Behalf Of Joe Clarke (jclarke) Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2022 2:54 PM To: opsawg@ietf.org Subject:

Re: [OPSAWG]  WG LC: Export of Segment Routing over IPv6 Information in IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX)

Hi, I support the progression of this document. The proposal has been demonstrated at the IETF 115 hackathon, and there are multiple open-source implementations. Cheers, Pablo. From: OPSAWG mailto:opsawg-boun...@ietf.org>> On Behalf Of Joe Clarke (jclarke) Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2022 2:54

Re: [OPSAWG]  WG LC: Export of Segment Routing over IPv6 Information in IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX)

Dear OPSAWG, I support this document to move forward. SRv6 has gained lot of traction, thus, having a way to collect SR information through a standard mechanism like IPFIX will enhance the monitoring of the network. In addition, the proposal has already been validated in the IETF 115 hackathon

Re: [OPSAWG]  WG LC: Export of Segment Routing over IPv6 Information in IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX)

Dear WG, I have read the draft and support moving this work toward publication. It is relevant as it specifies new IPFIX Information Elements necessary for the export of SRv6-related information and the management of an SRv6 network. Best Regards Paolo From: OPSAWG

Re: [OPSAWG]  WG LC: Export of Segment Routing over IPv6 Information in IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX)

Dear OPSAWG, In the same lines, I just wanted to say that I implemented this draft in the open-source project Fd.io VPP (*) and found no issues. Alex (*) https://github.com/insa-unyte/vpp-srh-onpath-telemetry > On 5 Dec

Re: [OPSAWG] WG LC: Export of Segment Routing over IPv6 Information in IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX)

Hi Chairs, folks, I support the Last Call of this draft. The approach defined in this draft is very useful for operators who have deployed SRv6, and the text is well written, I hope it can progress and enter a new stage to meet the requirement of SRv6 operation. Thanks are given to the

Re: [OPSAWG]  WG LC: Export of Segment Routing over IPv6 Information in IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX)

Hi, Speaking with my hat of software developer: I have implemented this in the free open-source flow collector pmacct (*) as part of the IETF 115 hackathon and found no issues. I hence support WGLC of the document. Paolo (*) https://github.com/pmacct/pmacct On 30/11/22 10:53, Joe Clarke

Re: [OPSAWG]  WG LC: Export of Segment Routing over IPv6 Information in IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX)

Hi Med, On 11/30/2022 4:12 PM, mohamed.boucad...@orange.com wrote: Hi all, This version addresses all the comments raised in my previous review of the document. I have only very few comments: * Section “5.9.  srhActiveSegmentIPv6Type”: please add the pointer to the IANA registry

Re: [OPSAWG]  WG LC: Export of Segment Routing over IPv6 Information in IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX)

Dear OPSAWG, As a contributor, I believe this work is ready and necessary for SRv6 networks. I support the WG LC. Regards, Alex > On 30 Nov 2022, at 14:53, Joe Clarke (jclarke) > wrote: > > Hello, WG. As discussed at IETF 115, we want to conduct a WG LC for >

Re: [OPSAWG]  WG LC: Export of Segment Routing over IPv6 Information in IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX)

Dear Qin, Thanks a lot for the detailed review and comments. This is much appreciated. My answers inline. I am tracking the changes in here:

Re: [OPSAWG]  WG LC: Export of Segment Routing over IPv6 Information in IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX)

Hi, All: Thanks authors to write this draft and validate it using Hackathon project. I take some time to review this draft, my general position is to support moving this work toward publication. Here are a few comments and suggestions: 1. Abstract: What is the difference between “the SRv6

Re: [OPSAWG]  WG LC: Export of Segment Routing over IPv6 Information in IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX)

Hi All, I have read the document and I support advancing it. It is relevant as it specifies IPFIX extensions to export SRv6 related information. Regards, Giuseppe From: OPSAWG On Behalf Of Joe Clarke (jclarke) Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2022 2:54 PM To: opsawg@ietf.org Subject: [OPSAWG] 

Re: [OPSAWG]  WG LC: Export of Segment Routing over IPv6 Information in IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX)

Dear OPSAWG， I support the WGLC for this document and believe it’s an important extension to IPFIX to address the emerging SRv6 use case. Thanks! Haoyu From: OPSAWG mailto:opsawg-boun...@ietf.org>> On Behalf Of Joe Clarke (jclarke) Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2022 2:54 PM To:

Re: [OPSAWG]  WG LC: Export of Segment Routing over IPv6 Information in IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX)

Dear OPSAWG, Writing as one of the authors. Talking to various network operators deploying SRv6 and network vendors implementing the document in the last few months, refining the document steadily and arrived at this stable state, I believe this document is ready for working group last call.

Re: [OPSAWG]  WG LC: Export of Segment Routing over IPv6 Information in IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX)

Hi all, This version addresses all the comments raised in my previous review of the document. I have only very few comments: * Section “5.9. srhActiveSegmentIPv6Type”: please add the pointer to the IANA registry under “Additional Information”. * Section 6.3: * Is there any