Dave,
Hey, Watch it! If I had been using a single source, I would have said so...
and quoted from it. My data are from books, journals, lab reports, and other
scientific reports from across more than 50 years. I have known specifically
about the geology and marine biology of the Med basin and
Rochelle,
Hey, Watch it! If I had been using a single source, I
would have said so ... and quoted from it. My data are from
books, journals, lab reports, and other scientific reports
from across more than 50 years. I have known specifically
about the geology and marine biology of the Med basin
Dave,
This sure sounds like a great resource...
I didn't think you intended to or I'd have pulled your ears off VBG
Cheers,
Rochelle
--
Dr. R.I.S. Altman, co-coordinator, IOUDAIOS-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For private reply, e-mail to Rochelle I. Altman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dear Rochelle,
The cracked cistern
---
Zavislock, .. He sees that the cracking was done at the
first introduction of water into the structure --
Fair enough; *as I noted*, if from settling because of the clay softening,
it would have cracked at the first rains.
Dear Rochelle,
I'd like to deal with two things:
The cracked cistern
---
Parenthetically, the so-called earthquake faultline supplied by de Vaux
as having damaged the eastern cistern, seems to have been an invention,
as another explanation for the data, supplied by our old
Ian H says:
The conversation was about the limit of the sea level
based on the location of Ein Feshka during the Qumran
period. I can't see how hypothetical crevices, passes,
caves, etc., have any bearing on the local topography so as
to render irrelevant the altitude of Ein Feshka as a
limiting
Ian H says:
The conversation was about the limit of the sea level
based on the location of Ein Feshka during the Qumran
period. I can't see how hypothetical crevices, passes,
caves, etc., have any bearing on the local topography so as
to render irrelevant the altitude of Ein Feshka as a
Dave Washburn says:
First, I think Ian is right to request some evidence of
such a change. There should be a way to tell by something
in the topography whether such alterations might have taken
place, correct? Second, since it is specifically the Dead
Sea that is being discussed, why not skip
Dear Ian,
Okay, time for a coffee break in any case...
The cracked cistern
---
Zavislock, an architect with experience in repairs
after earthquake damage (who did reconstruction work
at Qumran). S
[snip]
He sees that the cracking was done at the
first
For what it is worth, while finding no good links to
topographical maps of the Dead Sea region, it does appear
that Rochelle is obtaining her information from the
following book, or something very like it:
_The Dead Sea: The Lake and Its Setting_, Edited by TINA M.
NIEMI, University of Missouri,
Dear Rochelle,
As the topic seems interesting, I guess I should have asked
a more useful question than
Is it really that clockwork?
How is the data extracted from the Lisan-type deposits and
how is it dated? While dendrochronology is more or less only
a matter of counting tree rings,
Hi, Ian G
The Lisan Peninsula is very low, as is the land below
Qumran. It doesn't take much change to cover much of it.
No, it sure does not... The Dead Sea is a closed basin; all you
need to bring the water level up is a geological humid period.
While the geological record can indicate
12 matches
Mail list logo
