Re: [osg-users] OSG 2.8.5 stable release discussion

2011-05-12 Thread Ryan Pavlik
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 7:55 PM, Paul Martz pma...@skew-matrix.com wrote: Would this be an improvement that would better be separated into a distinct option string like OutputRelativeTextures or something like that? Yes, that's the way I'm leaning now. Your patch changes

Re: [osg-users] OSG 2.8.5 stable release discussion

2011-05-11 Thread Ryan Pavlik
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 8:24 PM, Paul Martz pma...@skew-matrix.com wrote: On 5/10/2011 7:11 PM, Paul Martz wrote: On 5/3/2011 3:02 PM, Ryan Pavlik wrote: I'd like to propose my fixes that I sent in on -submissions pre-2.8.4: all except the VC2010 build fix still apply. They are these two:

Re: [osg-users] OSG 2.8.5 stable release discussion

2011-05-11 Thread Ryan Pavlik
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 8:11 PM, Paul Martz pma...@skew-matrix.com wrote: On 5/3/2011 3:02 PM, Ryan Pavlik wrote: I'd like to propose my fixes that I sent in on -submissions pre-2.8.4: all except the VC2010 build fix still apply. They are these two: Improvements to osgconv:

Re: [osg-users] OSG 2.8.5 stable release discussion

2011-05-11 Thread Paul Martz
On 5/11/2011 11:21 AM, Ryan Pavlik wrote: So, if I understand correctly, you did not post this change to osg-submissions for inclusion in OSG's svn trunk, is that correct? Or, you did post them, but they are awaiting action by Robert? I hadn't done the forward-port to trunk until I

Re: [osg-users] OSG 2.8.5 stable release discussion

2011-05-11 Thread Paul Martz
On 5/11/2011 11:20 AM, Ryan Pavlik wrote: On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 8:24 PM, Paul Martz pma...@skew-matrix.com mailto:pma...@skew-matrix.com wrote: On 5/10/2011 7:11 PM, Paul Martz wrote: On 5/3/2011 3:02 PM, Ryan Pavlik wrote: I'd like to propose my fixes that I sent

Re: [osg-users] OSG 2.8.5 stable release discussion

2011-05-11 Thread Ryan Pavlik
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 1:27 PM, Paul Martz pma...@skew-matrix.com wrote: On 5/11/2011 11:20 AM, Ryan Pavlik wrote: On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 8:24 PM, Paul Martz pma...@skew-matrix.com mailto:pma...@skew-matrix.com wrote: On 5/10/2011 7:11 PM, Paul Martz wrote: On 5/3/2011 3:02

Re: [osg-users] OSG 2.8.5 stable release discussion

2011-05-11 Thread Paul Martz
On 5/11/2011 1:46 PM, Ryan Pavlik wrote: On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 1:27 PM, Paul Martz pma...@skew-matrix.com mailto:pma...@skew-matrix.com wrote: On 5/11/2011 11:20 AM, Ryan Pavlik wrote: On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 8:24 PM, Paul Martz pma...@skew-matrix.com

Re: [osg-users] OSG 2.8.5 stable release discussion

2011-05-11 Thread Ryan Pavlik
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 5:19 PM, Paul Martz pma...@skew-matrix.com wrote: On 5/11/2011 1:46 PM, Ryan Pavlik wrote: On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 1:27 PM, Paul Martz pma...@skew-matrix.com mailto:pma...@skew-matrix.com wrote: On 5/11/2011 11:20 AM, Ryan Pavlik wrote: On Tue, May

Re: [osg-users] OSG 2.8.5 stable release discussion

2011-05-11 Thread Paul Martz
Would this be an improvement that would better be separated into a distinct option string like OutputRelativeTextures or something like that? Yes, that's the way I'm leaning now. Your patch changes behavior, and would break any apps or utilities that depend on the

Re: [osg-users] OSG 2.8.5 stable release discussion

2011-05-10 Thread Paul Martz
On 5/3/2011 3:02 PM, Ryan Pavlik wrote: I'd like to propose my fixes that I sent in on -submissions pre-2.8.4: all except the VC2010 build fix still apply. They are these two: Improvements to osgconv: https://github.com/rpavlik/osg/compare/OpenSceneGraph-2.8...improve-osgconv (I've also

Re: [osg-users] OSG 2.8.5 stable release discussion

2011-05-10 Thread Paul Martz
On 5/10/2011 7:11 PM, Paul Martz wrote: On 5/3/2011 3:02 PM, Ryan Pavlik wrote: I'd like to propose my fixes that I sent in on -submissions pre-2.8.4: all except the VC2010 build fix still apply. They are these two: Improvements to osgconv:

Re: [osg-users] OSG 2.8.5 stable release discussion

2011-05-04 Thread Paul Martz
(My replies to Ryan Pavlik on this thread seem to be getting routed to /dev/null, so here's a repost...) Hi Ryan -- For future reference (as mentioned previously on this thread), submissions for 2.8.5 should be posted to osg-submissions. But I've got this now, so no problem. I'll take a

Re: [osg-users] OSG 2.8.5 stable release discussion

2011-05-04 Thread Ryan Pavlik
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 12:31 PM, Paul Martz pma...@skew-matrix.com wrote: (My replies to Ryan Pavlik on this thread seem to be getting routed to /dev/null, so here's a repost...) Hi Ryan -- For future reference (as mentioned previously on this thread), submissions for 2.8.5 should be posted

Re: [osg-users] OSG 2.8.5 stable release discussion

2011-05-03 Thread Robert Osfield
Hi Paul, On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 12:26 AM, Paul Martz pma...@skew-matrix.com wrote: Hi Robert and all -- It is very likely that I'll move forward with the 2.8.5 release as we have been discussing on this thread. I'd like to reserve SO version number 74 for this release. OK, I'll skip 74 next

[osg-users] OSG 2.8.5 stable release discussion

2011-05-03 Thread Ryan Pavlik
I'd like to propose my fixes that I sent in on -submissions pre-2.8.4: all except the VC2010 build fix still apply. They are these two: Improvements to osgconv: https://github.com/rpavlik/osg/compare/OpenSceneGraph-2.8...improve-osgconv (I've also forward-ported these to trunk:

Re: [osg-users] OSG 2.8.5 stable release discussion

2011-05-03 Thread Chris 'Xenon' Hanson
On 5/3/2011 3:02 PM, Ryan Pavlik wrote: I'd like to propose my fixes that I sent in on -submissions pre-2.8.4: all except the VC2010 build fix still apply. They are these two: Improvements to osgconv: https://github.com/rpavlik/osg/compare/OpenSceneGraph-2.8...improve-osgconv (I've also

Re: [osg-users] OSG 2.8.5 stable release discussion

2011-05-03 Thread Ryan Pavlik
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 4:55 PM, Chris 'Xenon' Hanson xe...@alphapixel.comwrote: On 5/3/2011 3:02 PM, Ryan Pavlik wrote: I'd like to propose my fixes that I sent in on -submissions pre-2.8.4: all except the VC2010 build fix still apply. They are these two: Improvements to osgconv:

Re: [osg-users] OSG 2.8.5 stable release discussion

2011-05-03 Thread Chris 'Xenon' Hanson
On 5/3/2011 4:30 PM, Ryan Pavlik wrote: GitHub should give you access to the updated files in whatever form you prefer - patch, full file, etc. I haven't figured out how to automatically zip up the full files for all files touched (as requested in the submission info) using Git yet, but

Re: [osg-users] OSG 2.8.5 stable release discussion

2011-05-02 Thread mike . weiblen
pma...@skew-matrix.com Sender: osg-users-bounces@lists.openscenegraph.orgDate: Sun, 01 May 2011 18:57:27 To: OpenSceneGraph Usersosg-users@lists.openscenegraph.org Reply-To: OpenSceneGraph Users osg-users@lists.openscenegraph.org Subject: Re: [osg-users] OSG 2.8.5 stable release discussion Hi Chris

Re: [osg-users] OSG 2.8.5 stable release discussion

2011-05-02 Thread Paul Martz
-users@lists.openscenegraph.org Reply-To: OpenSceneGraph Usersosg-users@lists.openscenegraph.org Subject: Re: [osg-users] OSG 2.8.5 stable release discussion Hi Chris -- I'd like to add r11952 to the 2.8.5 feature list. This was Michael Plating's performance enhancement for large numbers of uniforms

Re: [osg-users] OSG 2.8.5 stable release discussion

2011-05-02 Thread Paul Martz
Hi Robert and all -- It is very likely that I'll move forward with the 2.8.5 release as we have been discussing on this thread. I'd like to reserve SO version number 74 for this release. -Paul ___ osg-users mailing list

Re: [osg-users] OSG 2.8.5 stable release discussion

2011-05-01 Thread Paul Martz
Hi Chris -- I'd like to add r11952 to the 2.8.5 feature list. This was Michael Plating's performance enhancement for large numbers of uniforms, which effectively eliminates the std::mapstd::string lookup. There hasn't been any posts on this thread for 10 days, so it looks like you and I are

[osg-users] OSG 2.8.5 stable release discussion

2011-04-20 Thread Chris 'Xenon' Hanson
I'd like to open the discussion about a possible 2.8.5 release. I'll preface this by saying, don't request improvements unless you're willing to chip in to get them done, or help someone else get them done. ;) These are some of the improvements that have been proposed by a small group

Re: [osg-users] OSG 2.8.5 stable release discussion

2011-04-20 Thread Paul Martz
On 4/20/2011 10:41 AM, Chris 'Xenon' Hanson wrote: I'll preface this by saying, don't request improvements unless you're willing to chip in to get them done, or help someone else get them done. ;) Assuming I'll be the one committing the changes to the 2.8 branch... I'd like to see the

Re: [osg-users] OSG 2.8.5 stable release discussion

2011-04-20 Thread Chris 'Xenon' Hanson
On 4/20/2011 11:06 AM, Paul Martz wrote: On 4/20/2011 10:41 AM, Chris 'Xenon' Hanson wrote: I'll preface this by saying, don't request improvements unless you're willing to chip in to get them done, or help someone else get them done. ;) Assuming I'll be the one committing the changes to