Re: [Owfs-developers] New site

2016-09-09 Thread Colin Reese
Well, I have to say that the site looks outdated and is difficult to navigate. It does not make it easy to get information that appears useful or authoritative. When I was new to owfs, I could not find even the basic information I needed to explain how owfs and owserver interact. The best

Re: [Owfs-developers] New site

2016-09-09 Thread Jan Kandziora
Am 08.09.2016 um 22:32 schrieb Johan Ström: > > .. what else? > First: I'd love to get rid of are these personal blogs who give stray information bites which are quickly outdated and totally out of control. This is the source of most misfortune for owfs users. I'm pretty sure only 1 of 10 shows

Re: [Owfs-developers] Datanab MAX31850 reading

2016-09-09 Thread Colin Law
On 9 September 2016 at 15:20, Matthias Urlichs wrote: > On 09.09.2016 15:50, Uwe Bonnes wrote: >> So you mean that */temperature* should return the thermocouple temperature >> and */thermocouple should vanish and */coldjunction (or a similar name) >> should appear and

Re: [Owfs-developers] Datanab MAX31850 reading

2016-09-09 Thread Jan Kandziora
Am 09.09.2016 um 15:50 schrieb Uwe Bonnes: > > So you mean that */temperature* should return the thermocouple temperature > and */thermocouple should vanish and */coldjunction (or a similar name) > should appear and return the internal temperature? > > This sounds also much clearer to me and

Re: [Owfs-developers] Datanab MAX31850 reading

2016-09-09 Thread Matthias Urlichs
On 09.09.2016 15:50, Uwe Bonnes wrote: > So you mean that */temperature* should return the thermocouple temperature > and */thermocouple should vanish and */coldjunction (or a similar name) > should appear and return the internal temperature? > > This sounds also much clearer to me and I will

Re: [Owfs-developers] Datanab MAX31850 reading

2016-09-09 Thread Uwe Bonnes
> "Paul" == Paul W Panish writes: Paul> Jan, Uwe: The values were switched as a result of the change I Paul> submitted to Paul a couple of years ago. I was experimenting with Paul> the MAX31850 and getting what I thought were garbage results. I Paul>

Re: [Owfs-developers] Datanab MAX31850 reading

2016-09-09 Thread Paul W Panish
Jan, Uwe: The values were switched as a result of the change I submitted to Paul a couple of years ago. I was experimenting with the MAX31850 and getting what I thought were garbage results. I was not familiar with the code and submitted a simple change that I worked out empirically by

Re: [Owfs-developers] Datanab MAX31850 reading

2016-09-09 Thread Jan Kandziora
Am 09.09.2016 um 14:00 schrieb Uwe Bonnes: >> "Jan" == Jan Kandziora writes: > > Jan> Am 09.09.2016 um 11:15 schrieb Uwe Bonnes: > Jan> Uwe, I am not sure how we should handle this. IIRC, in the past, > Jan> the temperature values had been the way you suggest. But

Re: [Owfs-developers] Datanab MAX31850 reading

2016-09-09 Thread Uwe Bonnes
> "Jan" == Jan Kandziora writes: Jan> Am 09.09.2016 um 11:15 schrieb Uwe Bonnes: Jan> Uwe, I am not sure how we should handle this. IIRC, in the past, Jan> the temperature values had been the way you suggest. But for some Jan> reason I not aware anymore, this had

Re: [Owfs-developers] Datanab MAX31850 reading

2016-09-09 Thread Jan Kandziora
Am 09.09.2016 um 11:15 schrieb Uwe Bonnes: > > In article <5db40b85-90cb-333c-bf0e-ba66a5f26...@gmail.com> you wrote: >> Hello all, > >> I have a Datanab TC to 1Wire that uses a MAX31850: > >> http://www.datanab.com/sensors/1wire-%20thermocouple-sensor-thrmcpl_k.php > >> The device reads fine

Re: [Owfs-developers] Datanab MAX31850 reading

2016-09-09 Thread Uwe Bonnes
In article <5db40b85-90cb-333c-bf0e-ba66a5f26...@gmail.com> you wrote: > Hello all, > I have a Datanab TC to 1Wire that uses a MAX31850: > http://www.datanab.com/sensors/1wire-%20thermocouple-sensor-thrmcpl_k.php > The device reads fine using a DS9490R on Windows using a package I have >