Hi,
I am having problems to understand why my DRBD ms resource wants a
location constraint. My setup is quite simple
3 nodes
2 resource groups which hold ip,fs and the dymmy resources
2 resources for 2 drbd
2 master/slave resource for 2 DRBD.
The objective is to have pbx_service_01 to use as
On 21 September 2010 08:38, Andrew Beekhof and...@beekhof.net wrote:
BTW, why does crm_mon report only 4 resource?
Because the drbd resources were made into master/slaves.
See:
ms ms-drbd_01 drbd_01 \
meta master-max=1 master-node-max=1 clone-max=2
clone-node-max=1 notify=true
On 21 September 2010 09:04, Andrew Beekhof and...@beekhof.net wrote:
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 8:58 AM, Pavlos Parissis
pavlos.paris...@gmail.com wrote:
On 21 September 2010 08:38, Andrew Beekhof and...@beekhof.net wrote:
BTW, why does crm_mon report only 4 resource?
Because the drbd resources
Hi,
I am trying to figure a way to do the following
if the monitor of x resource fails N time in a period of Z then fail over to
the other node and clear fail-count.
Regards,
Pavlos
___
Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
On 21 September 2010 15:28, Vadym Chepkov vchep...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 9:14 AM, Dan Frincu dfri...@streamwide.ro wrote:
Hi,
This =
http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/en-US/Pacemaker/1.0/html/Pacemaker_Explained/s-failure-migration.html
explains it pretty well. Notice
Hi,
What is the default value for target-role in resource?
I tried to query it with crm_resource but without success.
crm_resource pbx_02 --get-property target-role
crm_resource pbx_02 --get-parameter target-role --meta
Cheers,
Pavlos
___
Pacemaker
On 24 September 2010 11:40, Michael Schhwartzkopff mi...@clusterbau.comwrote:
On Friday 24 September 2010 11:34:11 Pavlos Parissis wrote:
Hi,
What is the default value for target-role in resource?
I tried to query it with crm_resource but without success.
crm_resource pbx_02 --get
On 24 September 2010 13:54, Michael Schhwartzkopff mi...@clusterbau.comwrote:
On Friday 24 September 2010 13:50:49 Pavlos Parissis wrote:
Hi,
When I verify my conf I get complains about the timeout on start and stop
operation
crm(live)configure# verify
WARNING: drbd_01: default
On 24 September 2010 18:12, Dejan Muhamedagic deja...@fastmail.fm wrote:
[...snip...]
Default timeout is coded into the resource agent. You safely can ignore
the
WARNINGs. These are also removed from more recent versions of pacemaker.
These warnings shouldn't be ignored. The defaults
On 27 September 2010 12:17, Dejan Muhamedagic deja...@fastmail.fm wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 12:00:19PM +0200, Pavlos Parissis wrote:
On 24 September 2010 18:12, Dejan Muhamedagic deja...@fastmail.fm
wrote:
[...snip...]
Default timeout is coded into the resource agent
Hi,
When I issue crm resource move pbx_service_01 node-0N it moves this
resource group but the fs_01 resource is not started because drbd_01 is
still running on other node and it is not moved as well tonode-0N, even I
have colocation constraints.
I am pretty sure that I have that working before,
Hi,
Let's say that I have manually demote a ms resource and have the following
situation
crm(live)resource# demote ms-drbd_01
crm(live)resource# status
[..snip..]
Master/Slave Set: ms-drbd_01
Slaves: [ node-01 node-03 ]
How can I manually promote ms-drbd_01 on node-03?
The promote command
On 28 September 2010 15:09, Pavlos Parissis pavlos.paris...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
When I issue crm resource move pbx_service_01 node-0N it moves this
resource group but the fs_01 resource is not started because drbd_01 is
still running on other node and it is not moved as well tonode-0N, even
Please paste the conf of corosync, without suppling the conf is quite difficult
to help you
Cheers,
Pavlos
___
Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
Project Home:
On 29 September 2010 21:01, Andreas Hofmeister a...@collax.com wrote:
On 29.09.2010 19:59, Mike A Meyer wrote:
We have two nodes that we have the IP address assigned to a bond0 network
interface instead of the usual eth0 network interface. We are wondering if
there are issues with trying
On 30 September 2010 15:23, Mike A Meyer mme...@cds-global.com wrote:
Pavlos,
Thanks for helping out on this. We are running on RHEL 5.5 running on the
iron and not a VM. We don't have SELinux turned on and the firewall is
disabled. Here is information in the /etc/modprobe.conf file.
Hi
Could be related to a possible bug mentioned here[1]?
BTW here is the conf of pacemaker
node $id=b8ad13a6-8a6e-4304-a4a1-8f69fa735100 node-02
node $id=d5557037-cf8f-49b7-95f5-c264927a0c76 node-01
node $id=e5195d6b-ed14-4bb3-92d3-9105543f9251 node-03
primitive drbd_01 ocf:linbit:drbd \
= TRUE;
}
return delete_resource;
}
On 1 October 2010 09:13, Pavlos Parissis pavlos.paris...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
Could be related to a possible bug mentioned here[1]?
BTW here is the conf of pacemaker
node $id=b8ad13a6-8a6e-4304-a4a1-8f69fa735100 node-02
node $id=d5557037-cf8f-49b7
I am wondering if resource-stickiness=1000 could be reason for the
behavior I see, but again when on the other cluster i recreated the ms-drbd
the issue was solved.
___
Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
it.
Not sure about the shell syntax though.
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 3:51 PM, Pavlos Parissis
pavlos.paris...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Let's say that I have manually demote a ms resource and have the
following
situation
crm(live)resource# demote ms-drbd_01
crm(live)resource# status
[..snip
Hi
Which fencing devices will you recommend? I want to use a device which will
give as less problems as possible on configuring a fencing resource for 3
node cluster.
Regards,
Pavlos
___
Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
On 5 October 2010 11:15, Andrew Beekhof and...@beekhof.net wrote:
On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 9:53 AM, Pavlos Parissis
pavlos.paris...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
It seams that it happens every time PE wants to check the conf
09:23:55 crmd: [3473]: info: crm_timer_popped: PEngine Recheck Timer
Hi,
I am thinking to put under cluster control the sshd and I am checking if the
/etc/init.d/sshd supplied by RedHat 5.4 is compatible with LSB.
So, I run the test mentioned here [1] and it fails at test 6, it returns 1
and failed message.
Could this create problems within pacemaker?
Regards,
On 5 October 2010 13:19, Andrew Beekhof and...@beekhof.net wrote:
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 12:51 PM, Pavlos Parissis
pavlos.paris...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I am thinking to put under cluster control the sshd and I am checking if
the
/etc/init.d/sshd supplied by RedHat 5.4 is compatible
On 5 October 2010 22:12, Mike A Meyer mme...@cds-global.com wrote:
We are setup in a two node active/passive cluster using pacemaker/corosync.
We shutdown the pacemaker/corosync on both nodes and changed the uname -n
on our nodes to show the short name instead of the FQDN. Started up
On 7 October 2010 08:33, Andrew Beekhof and...@beekhof.net wrote:
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 5:04 PM, Gianluca Cecchi
gianluca.cec...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 4:25 PM, Shravan Mishra shravan.mis...@gmail.com
wrote:
That is what I heard too, that's the reason for this question.
On 8 October 2010 04:26, jiaju liu liujiaj...@yahoo.com.cn wrote:
Message: 2
Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2010 21:58:29 +0200
From: Pavlos Parissis
pavlos.paris...@gmail.comhttp://cn.mc157.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=pavlos.paris...@gmail.com
To: The Pacemaker cluster resource manager
On 8 October 2010 08:29, Andrew Beekhof and...@beekhof.net wrote:
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 9:58 PM, Pavlos Parissis
pavlos.paris...@gmail.com wrote:
On 7 October 2010 09:01, Andrew Beekhof and...@beekhof.net wrote:
On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 6:31 PM, Pavlos Parissis
pavlos.paris...@gmail.com
On 8 October 2010 09:28, Andrew Beekhof and...@beekhof.net wrote:
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 8:31 AM, Pavlos Parissis
pavlos.paris...@gmail.com wrote:
On 8 October 2010 07:47, Andrew Beekhof and...@beekhof.net wrote:
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 10:10 PM, Pavlos Parissis
pavlos.paris...@gmail.com wrote
On 8 October 2010 09:29, Andrew Beekhof and...@beekhof.net wrote:
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 8:34 AM, Pavlos Parissis
pavlos.paris...@gmail.com wrote:
On 8 October 2010 08:29, Andrew Beekhof and...@beekhof.net wrote:
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 9:58 PM, Pavlos Parissis
pavlos.paris...@gmail.com wrote
Hi,
Does anyone know why PE wants to unpack resources on nodes that will
never run due to location constraints?
I am getting this messages and I am wondering if they harmless or not.
23:12:38 pengine: [7705]: notice: unpack_rsc_op: Hard error -
sshd-pbx_01_monitor_0 failed with rc=5: Preventing
On 8 October 2010 22:05, Pavlos Parissis pavlos.paris...@gmail.com wrote:
On 8 October 2010 09:29, Andrew Beekhof and...@beekhof.net wrote:
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 8:34 AM, Pavlos Parissis
pavlos.paris...@gmail.com wrote:
On 8 October 2010 08:29, Andrew Beekhof and...@beekhof.net wrote:
On Thu
Hi,
My resource is not started because I get this
00:44:27 crmd: [3141]: WARN: status_from_rc: Action 16
(pbx_02_monitor_0) on node-02 failed (target: 7 vs. rc: 5): Error
but when I run manually the status I get 3, which ok because the
application is stopped
[r...@node-02 ~]#
On 9 October 2010 23:20, Pavlos Parissis pavlos.paris...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Does anyone know why PE wants to unpack resources on nodes that will
never run due to location constraints?
I am getting this messages and I am wondering if they harmless or not.
23:12:38 pengine: [7705]: notice
On 8 October 2010 09:29, Andrew Beekhof and...@beekhof.net wrote:
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 8:34 AM, Pavlos Parissis
pavlos.paris...@gmail.com wrote:
On 8 October 2010 08:29, Andrew Beekhof and...@beekhof.net wrote:
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 9:58 PM, Pavlos Parissis
pavlos.paris...@gmail.com wrote
On 10 October 2010 17:40, Andrew Beekhof and...@beekhof.net wrote:
On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 12:47 AM, Pavlos Parissis
pavlos.paris...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
My resource is not started because I get this
00:44:27 crmd: [3141]: WARN: status_from_rc: Action 16
(pbx_02_monitor_0) on node-02
On 10 October 2010 17:39, Andrew Beekhof and...@beekhof.net wrote:
On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 11:20 PM, Pavlos Parissis
pavlos.paris...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Does anyone know why PE wants to unpack resources on nodes that will
never run due to location constraints?
Because part of its job
On 11 October 2010 11:12, Pavlos Parissis pavlos.paris...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Cluster got an error on monitor and stop action on a resource and
since then I can't do stop/start/manage/unmanage that resource.
For some strange reason the actions monitor/stop failed, manually
worked, but i
Hi,
I noticed a race condition while I was integration an application with
Pacemaker and thought to share with you.
The init script of the application is LSB-compliant and passes the
tests mentioned at the Pacemaker documentation. Moreover, the init
script
uses the supplied functions from the
/subsys/sshd-pbx_02 ] ; then
+success
+RETVAL=0
else
failure $Stopping $prog
fi
RETVAL=$?
+
+### Added by Pavlos Parissis ###
+# Disable the below bit because killall kills the script itself.
+# This causes
On 12 October 2010 20:00, Dan Frincu dfri...@streamwide.ro wrote:
Hi,
Lars Ellenberg wrote:
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 03:50:01PM +0300, Dan Frincu wrote:
Hi,
Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 10:27:13PM +0300, Dan Frincu wrote:
Hi,
I have the following setup:
On 13 October 2010 09:48, Dan Frincu dfri...@streamwide.ro wrote:
Hi,
I've noticed the same type of behavior, however in a different context, my
setup includes 3 drbd devices and a group of resources, all have to run on
the same node and move together to other nodes. My issue was with the
On 13 October 2010 10:50, Dan Frincu dfri...@streamwide.ro wrote:
From what I see you have a dual primary setup with failover on the third
node, basically if you have one drbd resource for which you have both
ordering and collocation, I don't think you need to improve it, if it
ain't broke,
On 11 October 2010 11:16, Pavlos Parissis pavlos.paris...@gmail.com wrote:
On 8 October 2010 09:29, Andrew Beekhof and...@beekhof.net wrote:
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 8:34 AM, Pavlos Parissis
pavlos.paris...@gmail.com wrote:
On 8 October 2010 08:29, Andrew Beekhof and...@beekhof.net wrote
On 15 October 2010 09:47, Marcel Hauser marcel_hau...@gmx.ch wrote:
But that is no problem. firewalling is no hard job any more. A reasonable
machine can firewall 1 GBit/s traffic.
valid point. my only concern is/was that i don't like the idea of a
passive firewall because when you
On 16 October 2010 00:45, Jai away...@gmail.com wrote:
I have setup a DRBD-Xen failover cluster. Last night at around 02:50 it
failed the resources from server bravo to alpha. I'm trying to find out
what caused the failover of resources. I don't see anything in the logs that
indicate the
Hi,
I am trying to make a rule to control the failback on the resources. I want
during working days from 06:00 to 23:00 and on weekend from 08:00 to 16:00
to have
resource-stickiness 1000 and on the left hours zero, so cluster can perform
failback any resource which failed over during the working
On 18 October 2010 04:03, Tim Serong tser...@novell.com wrote:
On 10/16/2010 at 09:45 AM, Jai away...@gmail.com wrote:
I have setup a DRBD-Xen failover cluster. Last night at around 02:50 it
failed
the resources from server bravo to alpha. I'm trying to find out what
caused the failover
On 18 October 2010 05:17, Jai away...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't seen anything as well, but I am not surprised by that. I have
seen a
similar issue on my cluster where logs weren't that helpful.
Does it still occur on your cluster?
No, I haven't seen it again. But it could be that I
On 18 October 2010 10:52, Florian Haas florian.h...@linbit.com wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Andreas Vogelsang a.vogels...@uni-muenster.de
To: pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
Sent: Monday, October 18, 2010 9:46:12 AM
Subject: [Pacemaker] Question: How many nodes can join a
On 18 October 2010 11:13, Dan Frincu dfri...@streamwide.ro wrote:
Pavlos Parissis wrote:
On 18 October 2010 10:52, Florian Haas florian.h...@linbit.com wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Andreas Vogelsang a.vogels...@uni-muenster.de
To: pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
Sent
On 19 October 2010 14:16, Andrew Beekhof and...@beekhof.net wrote:
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 11:25 AM, Pavlos Parissis
pavlos.paris...@gmail.com wrote:
On 10 October 2010 17:39, Andrew Beekhof and...@beekhof.net wrote:
On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 11:20 PM, Pavlos Parissis
pavlos.paris
On 25 October 2010 19:50, David Quenzler quenz...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there a way to limit failover behavior to a subset of cluster nodes
or pin a resource to a node?
Yes, there is a way.
Make sure you have a asymmetric cluster by setting symmetric-cluster to
false
and then configure
Hi,
I have a APC AP9606 PDU and I am trying to find a stonith agent which
works with that PDU.
The apcmaster and apcmastersnmp don't work as you see below. I managed
to get the rackpdu working by setting the outlet config (the oid for
snmpwalk fails) and setting also the command OID.
Here is a
On 27 October 2010 14:09, Vadym Chepkov vchep...@gmail.com wrote:
[...snip...]
Hold on a sec, are you using clone on AP7901? Does it support multiple
connections? Mine it doesn't.
Then it's useless regardless clone or not, you have to have multiple
instances, because server can't reliable
Hi,
I quickly tested cloning on this fencing and it worked. I used iptables to
break the heartbeat link on node-01 and it was fenced by the other node -
the DC.
In the coming days I will test without cloning fencing device.
Cheers,
Pavlos
___
Pacemaker
On 27 October 2010 14:09, Vadym Chepkov vchep...@gmail.com wrote:
On Oct 27, 2010, at 7:58 AM, Pavlos Parissis wrote:
On 27 October 2010 13:43, Vadym Chepkov vchep...@gmail.com wrote:
On Oct 27, 2010, at 7:27 AM, Pavlos Parissis wrote:
On 27 October 2010 13:12, Vadym Chepkov vchep
On 27 October 2010 19:23, Vadym Chepkov vchep...@gmail.com wrote:
On Oct 27, 2010, at 1:18 PM, Pavlos Parissis wrote:
ok, i have done the same hack but i will remove it. I think 1.1.4 will be
out before we go on production and hopefully this will be fixed in 1.1.4.
This is part
I did more testing using the clone type of fencing and worked as I expected.
test1 hack init script to return 1 on stop and run a crm resource move on
that resource
result node it was fenced and resource was started on the other node
test2 using firewall to break the heartbeat links on node with
On 27 October 2010 19:46, Pavlos Parissis pavlos.paris...@gmail.com wrote:
I did more testing using the clone type of fencing and worked as I
expected.
test1 hack init script to return 1 on stop and run a crm resource move on
that resource
result node it was fenced and resource was started
this
http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linuxha/users/67482?search_string=Redundant%20Rings%20%26quot;Still%20Not%20There%3F;#67482
post
has a lot information for you on this subject.
Cheers,
Pavlos
___
Pacemaker mailing list:
Hi,
When do we expect to have Pacemaker-1.1.4 available?
Cheers,
Pavlos
___
Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
Getting started:
On 28 October 2010 18:30, Guillaume Chanaud
guillaume.chan...@connecting-nature.com wrote:
[...snip...]
corosync and auth files are the same on server2?
Yes of course :D (copied by scp), as i told server1 can join when server2 is
offline, and server 2 can join when server1 is offline, but if
On 28 October 2010 22:55, Andrew Beekhof and...@beekhof.net wrote:
Its released already, but the wrong packages got built because I ran
the wrong command :-(
Fedora 13 packages are uploading now, I'll do opensuse 11.3 in the morning
I have seen the tag on Mercurial but I haven't seen any rpm
Hi,
I wanted to check what happens when the monitor of a fencing agents
fails, thus I disconnected the PDU from network, reduced the monitor
interval and put debug statements on the fencing script.
here is the debug statements on the status code
status)
if [ -z $pduip ]; then
On 29 October 2010 10:25, Andrew Beekhof and...@beekhof.net wrote:
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 8:15 AM, Pavlos Parissis
pavlos.paris...@gmail.com wrote:
On 28 October 2010 22:55, Andrew Beekhof and...@beekhof.net wrote:
Its released already, but the wrong packages got built because I ran
On 29 October 2010 11:47, Andrew Beekhof and...@beekhof.net wrote:
[...snip..]
There wont be unfortunately.
Some of the changes we needed to make involved the use of
g_hash_table_get_values() which only appeared in glib 2.14
So EPEL5 is stuck on the 1.0 series.
Does that mean I shouldn't use
On 29 October 2010 12:23, Andrew Beekhof and...@beekhof.net wrote:
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 11:58 AM, Pavlos Parissis
pavlos.paris...@gmail.com wrote:
On 29 October 2010 11:47, Andrew Beekhof and...@beekhof.net wrote:
[...snip..]
There wont be unfortunately.
Some of the changes we needed
Hi,
Does anyone know if the fencing agent ippower9258 works with IP Power
9258HP PDU?
The readme file of the fencing agent mentions the following
Especially IP Power 9258 HP uses a different http command interface
Doesn't that mean that it wont with 9258 HP?
The fact that Aviosys has different
On 30 October 2010 16:03, Pavlos Parissis pavlos.paris...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Does anyone know if the fencing agent ippower9258 works with IP Power
9258HP PDU?
The readme file of the fencing agent mentions the following
Especially IP Power 9258 HP uses a different http command interface
On 30 October 2010 19:55, Lars Kellogg-Stedman l...@oddbit.com wrote:
I have a two node cluster that hosts two virtual ips on the same network:
primitive proxy_0_ip ocf:heartbeat:IPaddr \
params ip=10.10.10.20 cidr_netmask=255.255.255.0 nic=eth3
primitive proxy_1_ip ocf:heartbeat:IPaddr
Hi,
I have been using 1.1.3 on CentOS and I decided to downgrade to
1.0.9.1-1.15.el5.
The procedure was the following
stop heartbeat on all cluster members
downgrade to 1.0.9 doing the following on all cluster memebrs
yum downgrade pacemaker-1.0.9.1-1.15.el5 pacemaker-libs-1.0.9.1-1.15.el5
On 1 November 2010 09:19, Pavlos Parissis pavlos.paris...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I have been using 1.1.3 on CentOS and I decided to downgrade to
1.0.9.1-1.15.el5.
The procedure was the following
stop heartbeat on all cluster members
downgrade to 1.0.9 doing the following on all cluster
On 1 November 2010 15:01, Rick Cone rc...@securepaymentsystems.com wrote:
Dejan,
Below I had:
primitive res_stonith stonith:apcmastersnmp \
params ipaddr=192.1.1.109 port=161 community=sps \
op start interval=0 timeout=60s \
op monitor interval=60s timeout=60s \
On 2 November 2010 11:04, Dejan Muhamedagic deja...@fastmail.fm wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 02, 2010 at 08:08:32AM +0100, Pavlos Parissis wrote:
On 1 November 2010 15:01, Rick Cone rc...@securepaymentsystems.com
wrote:
Dejan,
Below I had:
primitive res_stonith
On 2 November 2010 11:22, Dejan Muhamedagic deja...@fastmail.fm wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 08:37:04AM +0200, Pavlos Parissis wrote:
Hi,
I wanted to check what happens when the monitor of a fencing agents
fails, thus I disconnected the PDU from network, reduced the monitor
On 2 November 2010 12:58, Dejan Muhamedagic deja...@fastmail.fm wrote:
[...snip...]
Do you know under which conditions pacemaker initiates multiple
connections
to a fencing device?
There are no specific conditions. It can happen by chance because
individual clone instances run
On 2 November 2010 13:02, Dejan Muhamedagic deja...@fastmail.fm wrote:
[...snip...]
Definitely not. If you do the monitor action from the command
line does that also return the unexpected exit code:
from the code I pasted you can see it returned 1.
There is a difference.
On 2 November 2010 13:18, Dejan Muhamedagic deja...@fastmail.fm wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 02, 2010 at 01:09:02PM +0100, Pavlos Parissis wrote:
On 2 November 2010 13:02, Dejan Muhamedagic deja...@fastmail.fm wrote:
[...snip...]
Definitely not. If you do the monitor action from
Hi,
I am trying to figure out how I can resolve the following scenario
Facts
3 nodes
2 DRBD ms resource
2 group resource
by default drbd1/group1 runs on node-01 and drbd2/group2 runs on node2
drbd1/group1 can only run on node-01 and node-03
drbd2/group2 can only run on node-02 and node-03
DRBD
On 2 November 2010 16:15, Dan Frincu dfri...@streamwide.ro wrote:
Hi,
Pavlos Parissis wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to figure out how I can resolve the following scenario
Facts
3 nodes
2 DRBD ms resource
2 group resource
by default drbd1/group1 runs on node-01 and drbd2/group2 runs on node2
On 2 November 2010 22:07, Pavlos Parissis pavlos.paris...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2 November 2010 16:15, Dan Frincu dfri...@streamwide.ro wrote:
Hi,
Pavlos Parissis wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to figure out how I can resolve the following scenario
Facts
3 nodes
2 DRBD ms resource
2 group
On 2 November 2010 22:57, Lars Ellenberg lars.ellenb...@linbit.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 02, 2010 at 10:07:17PM +0100, Pavlos Parissis wrote:
On 2 November 2010 16:15, Dan Frincu dfri...@streamwide.ro wrote:
Hi,
Pavlos Parissis wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to figure out how I can resolve
On 3 November 2010 14:26, Ciro Iriarte cyru...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, I'm planning to run a PDC/BDC Samba pair with HA file service
(active/passive with DRBD). Would it be possible to have the second
node running SAMBA as a BDC and once the primary node fails, stop the
BDC resource and start the
On 4 November 2010 11:30, Michael Schwartzkopff mi...@clusterbau.com wrote:
On Thursday 04 November 2010 11:23:18 Michael Schwartzkopff wrote:
Hi,
I want to create a cluster with DRBD, Filesystem, a service and an IP
address. Failover should only be triggered by a sys admin and not happen
On 4 November 2010 12:01, Michael Schwartzkopff mi...@clusterbau.com wrote:
On Thursday 04 November 2010 11:56:54 Pavlos Parissis wrote:
On 4 November 2010 11:30, Michael Schwartzkopff mi...@clusterbau.com wrote:
On Thursday 04 November 2010 11:23:18 Michael Schwartzkopff wrote:
Hi,
I want
On 4 November 2010 14:18, Vladislav Bogdanov bub...@hoster-ok.com wrote:
04.11.2010 13:36, Pavlos Parissis wrote:
...
why do you want that?
Customer request. Definitely NOT my idea.
something like this could be useful
location master-location ms-drbd_02 rule $id=master-rule
On 5 November 2010 04:07, Vadym Chepkov vchep...@gmail.com wrote:
On Nov 4, 2010, at 12:53 PM, Alan Jones wrote:
If I understand you correctly, the role of the second resource in the
colocation command was defaulting to that of the first Master which
is not defined or is untested for
On 9 November 2010 09:47, Andrew Beekhof and...@beekhof.net wrote:
[...snip...]
Since there is no realistic upgrade path to 1.1.4 on EPEL, I am
wondering if there any benefit of staying on 1.1.3 compared to using
1.0.10.
Its already out :-)
Plus the ordering code is much improved.
I've
Hi,
Has anyone see the below error on a Filesytem resource?
11:19:33 crmd: [3296]: info: do_lrm_rsc_op: Performing
key=13:19:0:9d7002dc-2865-4610-9240-ff844f62205d op=fs_01_stop_0 )
11:19:33 lrmd: [3293]: info: rsc:fs_01:74: stop
11:19:33 Filesystem[31487]: [31493]: ERROR: Please set
On 9 November 2010 11:25, Pavlos Parissis pavlos.paris...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Has anyone see the below error on a Filesytem resource?
11:19:33 crmd: [3296]: info: do_lrm_rsc_op: Performing
key=13:19:0:9d7002dc-2865-4610-9240-ff844f62205d op=fs_01_stop_0 )
11:19:33 lrmd: [3293]: info
On 9 November 2010 14:14, Vadim S. Khondar v.khon...@o3.ua wrote:
If after this I edit CIB and apply it, all LRM messages disappear and
resource starts managed as it should.
what do you mean edit CIB?
BTW, I have seen that behavior as well on 1.0.9
Cheers,
Pavlos
On 10 November 2010 10:49, jiaju liu liujiaj...@yahoo.com.cn wrote:
the syslog as follows is these means there are some comunication problem in
cluster
oss1 crmd: [11282]: info: abort_transition_graph: do_te_invoke:191 -
Triggered transition abort (complete=0) : Peer Cancelled
oss1
On 10 November 2010 11:14, Raoul Bhatia [IPAX] r.bha...@ipax.at wrote:
hi,
On 11/10/2010 11:02 AM, Pavlos Parissis wrote:
Hi,
Although it has been mentioned in other threads that 1.0.10 is out I
don't see any RPMs in http://clusterlabs.org/rpm/epel-5/
where did you hear that from
Hi,
Although it has been mentioned in other threads that 1.0.10 is out I
don't see any RPMs in http://clusterlabs.org/rpm/epel-5/
I don't see any tag for 1.0.10 in mercucial
(http://hg.clusterlabs.org/pacemaker/1.0/) , but I don't see a tag for
1.0.9 either.
Is it actually released or I have
On 10 November 2010 11:16, Andrew Beekhof and...@beekhof.net wrote:
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 11:02 AM, Pavlos Parissis
pavlos.paris...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Although it has been mentioned in other threads that 1.0.10 is out
It is not.
1.1.3 is out which is a reason o use it instead of 1.0.10
On 11 November 2010 13:04, Dan Frincu dfri...@streamwide.ro wrote:
Hi,
Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 9:40 AM, Dan Frincu dfri...@streamwide.ro wrote:
Hi all,
I've managed to make this setup work, basically the issue with a
symmetric-cluster=false and specifying the
On 12 November 2010 07:37, jiaju liu liujiaj...@yahoo.com.cn wrote:
start resource steps
step(1)
crm configure primitive vol_mpath0 ocf:heartbeat:Filesystem meta
target-role=stopped params device=/dev/mapper/mpath0
directory=/mnt/mapper/mpath0 fstype='lustre' op start timeout=300s op stop
Hi,
I am trying to understand how the scores are calculated based on the
output of ptest -sL and I have few questions
Below is my scores with a line number column and the bottom you will
find my configuration
So, let's start
1 group_color: pbx_service_01 allocation score on node-01: 200
2
On 13 November 2010 23:24, Bob Schatz bsch...@yahoo.com wrote:
Lunch this week?
Yes, why not. where and at what time? Shall we go to Pacemaker
cafeteria as the other time, they are always available for us :-)
Cheers,
Pavlos
___
Pacemaker mailing
1 - 100 of 133 matches
Mail list logo
