[Bug 1478053] Review Request: nuvola-app-groove - Microsoft Groove for Nuvola Player 3
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1478053 Vít Ondruch changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|vondr...@redhat.com Flags||fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Vít Ondruch --- I'll take this for a review -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1478067] Review Request: nuvola-app-mixcloud - Mixcloud for Nuvola Player 3
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1478067 --- Comment #6 from Vít Ondruch --- I have noticed typo in the .metainfo.xml: Mixcload It should be "Mixcloud". -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1479967] Review Request: fritzing-parts - Parts library for the Fritzing electronic design application
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1479967 Robert-André Mauchin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||zebo...@gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Robert-André Mauchin --- Hello, No time to do a full review right now, but here's a preliminary couple of issues: - The tag "Group:" is to be removed. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Tags_and_Sections - Your patches… what do they do? Have they been reported upstream? Do you have a bug number for them? See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#All_patches_should_have_an_upstream_bug_link_or_comment - Change: Source0: https://github.com/fritzing/%{name}/archive/%{version}.tar.gz#/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz to Source0: https://github.com/fritzing/%{name}/archive/%{version}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz - %defattr(-,root,root,-) is not needed. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#File_Permissions -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1478053] Review Request: nuvola-app-groove - Microsoft Groove for Nuvola Player 3
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1478053 Vít Ondruch changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Vít Ondruch --- The package looks good => APPROVED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1478059] Review Request: nuvola-app-jango - Jango for Nuvola Player 3
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1478059 Vít Ondruch changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|vondr...@redhat.com Flags||fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Vít Ondruch --- Taking this for a review. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1478059] Review Request: nuvola-app-jango - Jango for Nuvola Player 3
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1478059 Vít Ondruch changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Vít Ondruch --- * Description - Please drop the "Mixcloud for Nuvola Player 3 : " from the description. This is already contained in summary. No need to repeat it. * .metainfo.xml typo in summary - s/Jano/Jango/ These are minor nits, so I APPROVE the package, but please fix them prior importing into Fedora. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1478067] Review Request: nuvola-app-mixcloud - Mixcloud for Nuvola Player 3
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1478067 --- Comment #7 from mgans...@alice.de --- (In reply to Vít Ondruch from comment #6) > I have noticed typo in the .metainfo.xml: > > Mixcload > > It should be "Mixcloud". corrected %changelog * Thu Aug 10 2017 Martin Gansser - 3.2-3 - correct %%{name}.metainfo.xml -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1478059] Review Request: nuvola-app-jango - Jango for Nuvola Player 3
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1478059 --- Comment #3 from mgans...@alice.de --- (In reply to Vít Ondruch from comment #2) > * Description > - Please drop the "Mixcloud for Nuvola Player 3 : " from the description. > This > is already contained in summary. No need to repeat it. There is no text "Mixcloud for Nuvola Player 3 :" i can drop from description. :) > > * .metainfo.xml typo in summary > - s/Jano/Jango/ > > These are minor nits, so I APPROVE the package, but please fix them prior > importing into Fedora. new rpm packages: Spec URL: https://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Review/SPECS/nuvola-app-jango.spec SRPM URL: https://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Review/SRPMS/nuvola-app-jango- 2.3-2.fc26.src.rpm %changelog * Thu Aug 10 2017 Martin Gansser - 2.3-2 - correct %%{name}.metainfo.xml -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1478059] Review Request: nuvola-app-jango - Jango for Nuvola Player 3
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1478059 --- Comment #4 from Vít Ondruch --- (In reply to mgans...@alice.de from comment #3) > (In reply to Vít Ondruch from comment #2) > > * Description > > - Please drop the "Mixcloud for Nuvola Player 3 : " from the description. > > This > > is already contained in summary. No need to repeat it. > > There is no text "Mixcloud for Nuvola Player 3 :" i can drop from > description. :) Ahh, silly me. Sorry for the confusion -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1480130] New: Review Request: perl-Math-Utils - Useful mathematical functions not in Perl
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1480130 Bug ID: 1480130 Summary: Review Request: perl-Math-Utils - Useful mathematical functions not in Perl Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: jples...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://jplesnik.fedorapeople.org/perl-Math-Utils/perl-Math-Utils.spec SRPM URL: https://jplesnik.fedorapeople.org/perl-Math-Utils/perl-Math-Utils-1.10-1.fc27.src.rpm Description: Math::Utils contains implementations of commonly used mathematical functions and operations that are not part of standard Perl. Fedora Account System Username: jples...@redhat.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1480130] Review Request: perl-Math-Utils - Useful mathematical functions not in Perl
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1480130 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||ppi...@redhat.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|ppi...@redhat.com Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1480130] Review Request: perl-Math-Utils - Useful mathematical functions not in Perl
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1480130 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1480032 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1480032 [Bug 1480032] perl-Math-Derivative-1.00 is available -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1478067] Review Request: nuvola-app-mixcloud - Mixcloud for Nuvola Player 3
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1478067 --- Comment #8 from mgans...@alice.de --- new rpm packages: Spec URL: https://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Review/SPECS/nuvola-app-mixcloud.spec SRPM URL: https://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Review/SRPMS/nuvola-app-mixcloud-3.2-3.fc26.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1480130] Review Request: perl-Math-Utils - Useful mathematical functions not in Perl
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1480130 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|1480032 | Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar --- URL and Source0 addresses are Ok. Source0 archive (SHA-256: 0905aab8b65ed08f951756dd86803267877f88e45027af458bb3b83d218cb7c4) is original. Ok. Summary verified in lib/Math/Utils.pm. Ok. Description is Ok. License verified in lib/Math/Utils.pm and README. The LICENSE file seems bogus (CPAN RT#122758). Ok. No XS code, noarch BuildArch is Ok. Test::CheckManifest not used. Ok. All tests pass. Ok. $ rpmlint perl-Math-Utils.spec ../SRPMS/perl-Math-Utils-1.10-1.fc27.src.rpm ../RPMS/noarch/perl-Math-Utils-1.10-1.fc27.noarch.rpm 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. rpmlint is Ok. $ rpm -q -lv -p ../RPMS/noarch/perl-Math-Utils-1.10-1.fc27.noarch.rpm drwxr-xr-x2 rootroot0 Aug 10 11:34 /usr/share/doc/perl-Math-Utils -rw-r--r--1 rootroot 3290 May 11 02:07 /usr/share/doc/perl-Math-Utils/Changes -rw-r--r--1 rootroot 2754 May 11 02:08 /usr/share/doc/perl-Math-Utils/README -rw-r--r--1 rootroot 6423 Aug 10 11:34 /usr/share/man/man3/Math::Utils.3pm.gz drwxr-xr-x2 rootroot0 Aug 10 11:34 /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/Math -rw-r--r--1 rootroot18759 Aug 10 11:34 /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/Math/Utils.pm File layout and permissions are Ok. $ rpm -q --requires -p ../RPMS/noarch/perl-Math-Utils-1.10-1.fc27.noarch.rpm | sort -f | uniq -c 1 perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.26.0) 1 perl(:VERSION) >= 5.10.1 1 perl(Carp) 1 perl(Exporter) 1 perl(integer) 1 perl(strict) 1 perl(warnings) 1 rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 1 rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1 1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 1 rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) <= 5.2-1 Binary requires are Ok. $ rpm -q --provides -p ../RPMS/noarch/perl-Math-Utils-1.10-1.fc27.noarch.rpm | sort -f | uniq -c 1 perl(Math::Utils) = 1.09 1 perl-Math-Utils = 1.10-1.fc27 Binary provides are Ok. $ resolvedeps rawhide ../RPMS/noarch/perl-Math-Utils-1.10-1.fc27.noarch.rpm Binary dependencies resolvable. Ok. The package builds in F27 (https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=21145375). Ok. The package is in line with Fedora and Perl packaging guidelines. Resolution: Package APPROVED. Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1480032 [Bug 1480032] perl-Math-Derivative-1.00 is available -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1480130] Review Request: perl-Math-Utils - Useful mathematical functions not in Perl
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1480130 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1480032 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1480032 [Bug 1480032] perl-Math-Derivative-1.00 is available -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1477154] Re-Review Request: meta-test-family - a tool to test components of a modular Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1477154 --- Comment #7 from Petr Hracek --- rpmlint Errors should be fixed by PR https://github.com/fedora-modularity/meta-test-family/pull/42 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1476589] Review Request: deepin-api - Go-lang bingding for dde-daemon
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1476589 --- Comment #7 from sensor@gmail.com --- SPEC: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/mosquito/deepin/fedora-25-x86_64/00588927-deepin-api/deepin-api.spec SRPM: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/mosquito/deepin/fedora-25-x86_64/00588927-deepin-api/deepin-api-3.1.11-2.fc25.src.rpm Fixed, but some packages does not submit for review. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1441728] Review Request: cld2 - Compact Language Detector 2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1441728 Kalev Lember changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||klem...@redhat.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|klem...@redhat.com Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #18 from Kalev Lember --- Packaging looks nice and clean to me. Approving based on Jan Kalina's unofficial review above. I'd maybe change two minor things, one is that %if 0%{?usesnapshot} %autosetup -n %name-%{commit0} %else %setup -q %endif ... seems a bit unsymmetrical; would be easier to read if both were %autosetup (or both were %setup -q) but not a mix like this. The other minor thing is that -devel package doesn't need to contain '%license LICENSE' since it's already included in the base package. Feel free to change these if you want after importing. APPROVED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1477154] Re-Review Request: meta-test-family - a tool to test components of a modular Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1477154 --- Comment #8 from Petr Hracek --- New updates based on PR. Spec URL: https://phracek.fedorapeople.org/meta-test-family.spec SRPM URL: https://phracek.fedorapeople.org/meta-test-family-0.5.20-1.fc25.src.rpm Installation errors --- INFO: mock.py version 1.4.2 starting (python version = 3.5.3)... Start: init plugins INFO: selinux disabled Finish: init plugins Start: run Start: chroot init INFO: calling preinit hooks INFO: enabled root cache INFO: enabled dnf cache Start: cleaning dnf metadata Finish: cleaning dnf metadata INFO: enabled HW Info plugin Mock Version: 1.4.2 INFO: Mock Version: 1.4.2 Finish: chroot init INFO: installing package(s): /home/phracek/work/programming/meta-test-family/review-meta-test-family/results/meta-test-family-0.5.20-1.fc25.noarch.rpm /home/phracek/work/programming/meta-test-family/review-meta-test-family/results/python2-meta-test-family-0.5.20-1.fc25.noarch.rpm ERROR: Command failed: # /usr/bin/dnf --installroot /var/lib/mock/fedora-25-x86_64/root/ --releasever 25 --disableplugin=local --setopt=deltarpm=False install /home/phracek/work/programming/meta-test-family/review-meta-test-family/results/meta-test-family-0.5.20-1.fc25.noarch.rpm /home/phracek/work/programming/meta-test-family/review-meta-test-family/results/python2-meta-test-family-0.5.20-1.fc25.noarch.rpm Rpmlint --- Checking: meta-test-family-0.5.20-1.fc25.noarch.rpm python2-meta-test-family-0.5.20-1.fc25.noarch.rpm meta-test-family-0.5.20-1.fc25.src.rpm meta-test-family.noarch: W: no-documentation meta-test-family.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/moduleframework/examples/base-runtime/resources/hello-world/hello.c meta-test-family.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/moduleframework/examples/multios_testing/moduleframework/module_framework.py meta-test-family.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/share/moduleframework/examples/memcached/sanity2.sh 644 /bin/bash meta-test-family.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary mtf-generator meta-test-family.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary moduleframework-cmd meta-test-family.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary modulelint python2-meta-test-family.noarch: W: no-documentation python2-meta-test-family.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/moduleframework/timeoutlib.py 644 /usr/bin/python python2-meta-test-family.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/moduleframework/bashhelper.py 644 /usr/bin/python python2-meta-test-family.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/moduleframework/mtf_generator.py 644 /usr/bin/python meta-test-family.src: W: invalid-url Source0: https://codeload.github.com/fedora-modularity/meta-test-family/tar.gz/meta-test-family-0.5.20.tar.gz HTTP Error 404: Not Found 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 5 errors, 7 warnings. As soon as PR will be merged, I will create release. mtf_generator.py is false possitive. It contains /usr/bin/python. bashhelper.py will be probably deleted. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1380826] Review Request: pgadmin4 - Management tool for PostgreSQL
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1380826 --- Comment #2 from Devrim GÜNDÜZ --- All the packages are available from https://yum.postgresql.org . The pgadmin4 packaging is not 100% stable enough yet, so I'll hold this ticket for a few weeks more. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1477154] Re-Review Request: meta-test-family - a tool to test components of a modular Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1477154 --- Comment #9 from Tomas Tomecek --- I'll do another review round once the release is done. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1479844] Review Request: deepin-notifications - System notifications for linuxdeepin desktop environment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1479844 --- Comment #2 from Zamir SUN --- Thanks. Updated in place. Spec URL: https://zsun.fedorapeople.org/pub/pkgs/deepin-notifications/deepin-notifications.spec SRPM URL: https://zsun.fedorapeople.org/pub/pkgs/deepin-notifications/deepin-notifications-3.0.6-2.fc27.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1474033] Review Request: ucx - Communication library implementing high-performance messaging
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1474033 --- Comment #9 from Andrey Maslennikov --- Spec URL: https://gist.github.com/amaslenn/3c847e0bdc063bcbb4b6507b5efbf6b9/raw/5be459ccf60ee116cc56296f72ecd38560961dee/ucx.spec SRPM URL: https://gist.github.com/amaslenn/3c847e0bdc063bcbb4b6507b5efbf6b9/raw/5be459ccf60ee116cc56296f72ecd38560961dee/ucx-1.2.0-1.fc25.src.rpm Koji build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=21147884 Details: > > %files > > %{_libdir}/lib*.so* > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Devel_Packages Unversioned .so moved to -devel. > > %{_datadir}/ucx/perftest/* > > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#File_and_Directory_Ownership > > Extra files are now removed in %install, fixed issue with file pattern. > > Is there anything else to fix here? Please also see below. > > The issue here is that the directories /usr/share/ucx and > /usr/share/ucs/perftest are not included in your packages. That's why I've > linked the directory ownership guidelines. Fixed. > > -devel package now has 'Provides: %{name}-static = %{version}-%{release}'. > > It is as if you deliberately misread > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Packaging_Static_Libraries > > because even if a "compelling reason" where given as why to include the > static libs, they don't belong into the -devel package, if there are also > shared libs. Static libs moved to separate -static package. -devel depends on it. > > It reports "[!]: Package should not use obsolete m4 macros" complaining > > on AC_PROG_LIBTOOL. Is it critical and has to fixed? > > That's not part of the review guidelines or packaging guidelines. The tool is > trying to be helpful. In case it became necessary to regenerate the configure > script during the build process, such as for a fix, obsolete macros would be > problematic. It's something to fix upstream. Make sure you can autoreconf the > source tarball on a recent installation of Fedora. OK, thanks. autoreconf works on f25. > > Another error it reports is from rpmlint: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath. > > Is there any other way to correctly specify the path for .so/executable > > files? > > If check-rpaths during an official build complained about it, proceed as > described at: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Beware_of_Rpath Couldn't reproduce it with fedora-review ran locally on spec/srpm. Added --disable-rpath to %configure anyway. > > It also reports mismatch in sizes/checksums of the tarball, which is > > expected: current link is for prev release, we will create a new one > > (v1.2.1) once pass this review. > > That is completely *unexpected*. The SourceURL *must* link exactly the source > archive that is included in the src.rpm. > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ReviewGuidelines > > MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, > as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use sha256sum for this task as > it is used by the sources file once imported into git. If no upstream URL can > be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how > to deal with this. Just want to have issues in spec fixed before creating actual release. Can we ignore this one for a while? Once others are resolved I'll fix it ASAP (will required creating a release). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1476489] Review Request: xfce4-statusnotifier-plugin - Panel area status notifier plugin for Xfce4
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1476489 --- Comment #8 from Ralph Bean --- (fedrepo-req-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/xfce4-statusnotifier-plugin -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1476489] Review Request: xfce4-statusnotifier-plugin - Panel area status notifier plugin for Xfce4
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1476489 --- Comment #9 from Ralph Bean --- (fedrepo-req-admin): Apologies for the delay! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1478358] Review Request: php-sebastian-diff2 - Diff implementation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1478358 --- Comment #6 from Ralph Bean --- (fedrepo-req-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/php-sebastian-diff2 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1478358] Review Request: php-sebastian-diff2 - Diff implementation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1478358 --- Comment #7 from Ralph Bean --- (fedrepo-req-admin): Apologies for the delay. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1468454] Review Request: php-pecl-timecop - Time travel and freezing extension
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1468454 --- Comment #7 from Ralph Bean --- (fedrepo-req-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/php-pecl-timecop -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1468454] Review Request: php-pecl-timecop - Time travel and freezing extension
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1468454 --- Comment #8 from Ralph Bean --- (fedrepo-req-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/php-pecl-timecop -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1427634] Review Request: syncthing - Continuous File Synchronization
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1427634 Athos Ribeiro changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #29 from Athos Ribeiro --- - License is OK - Requires and Provides are OK - The package provides the bundled packages used for the gui, as required - RPMlint still raises an error about hardcoded path, which shall be fixed in future releases of the package, since the package already contacted systemd upstream about the missing macro. The package looks good to me. Approved. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1479844] Review Request: deepin-notifications - System notifications for linuxdeepin desktop environment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1479844 Robert-André Mauchin (afk until next Thu) changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|POST Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Robert-André Mauchin (afk until next Thu) --- Everything is ok, package accepted. Thanks for your work. Package Review == Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed = MUST items = C/C++: [x]: Package does not contain kernel modules. [x]: Package contains no static executables. [x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la) [x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs. Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "GPL (v3 or later)", "Unknown or generated". 38 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/bob/packaging/review/deepin-notifications/review-deepin- notifications/licensecheck.txt [x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. [x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise. [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [-]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local = SHOULD items = Generic: [-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [-]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable. Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in deepin- notifications-debuginfo [?]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains tran
[Bug 1480279] New: Review Request: python-avocado-lts - Framework with tools and libraries for Automated Testing (LTS branch)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1480279 Bug ID: 1480279 Summary: Review Request: python-avocado-lts - Framework with tools and libraries for Automated Testing (LTS branch) Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: mmath...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://merlinm.fedorapeople.org/package-review/python-avocado-lts/python-avocado-lts.spec SRPM URL: https://merlinm.fedorapeople.org/package-review/python-avocado-lts/python-avocado-lts-52.0-1.fc27.src.rpm Koji scratch build URL: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=21148800 Description: Avocado is a set of tools and libraries (what people call these days a framework) to perform automated testing. This is the LTS (Long Term Stability) branch. Fedora Account System Username: merlinm Notes: This package is for the upstream LTS (Long Term Stability) branch of avocado. As of avocado version 52.0, the LTS branch is identical to the regular feature branch which is currently packaged in Fedora as "python-avocado". However, future LTS versions will be 52.1, 52.2, ... whereas future feature versions will be 53.0, 54.0, As a result of this versioning scheme, the base package name of the LTS version in Fedora needs to be different than the regular feature versions--otherwise the package manager, builders, etc. will always consider new LTS versions to immediately be obsolete. Thus, the request for this new package as "python-avocado-lts". -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1473705] Review Request: perl-Alien-Base-ModuleBuild - Perl framework for building Alien:: modules and their libraries
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1473705 --- Comment #4 from Ralph Bean --- (fedrepo-req-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Alien-Base-ModuleBuild -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1473705] Review Request: perl-Alien-Base-ModuleBuild - Perl framework for building Alien:: modules and their libraries
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1473705 --- Comment #5 from Ralph Bean --- (fedrepo-req-admin): Apologies for the delay. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1427634] Review Request: syncthing - Continuous File Synchronization
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1427634 --- Comment #30 from Fabio Valentini --- Thank you very much for the review! :) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1458840] Review Request: urw-base35-fonts - Level 2 Core Font Set for Ghostscript
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1458840 --- Comment #29 from Ralph Bean --- (fedrepo-req-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/urw-base35-fonts -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1458840] Review Request: urw-base35-fonts - Level 2 Core Font Set for Ghostscript
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1458840 --- Comment #30 from Ralph Bean --- (fedrepo-req-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/urw-base35-fonts -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1462465] Review Request: cmatrix - A scrolling 'Matrix'-like screen
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1462465 --- Comment #5 from Ralph Bean --- (fedrepo-req-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/cmatrix -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1462465] Review Request: cmatrix - A scrolling 'Matrix'-like screen
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1462465 --- Comment #6 from Ralph Bean --- (fedrepo-req-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/cmatrix -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1478703] Review Request: perl-Exporter-Easy - Takes the drudgery out of Exporting symbols
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1478703 --- Comment #2 from Ralph Bean --- (fedrepo-req-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Exporter-Easy -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1478703] Review Request: perl-Exporter-Easy - Takes the drudgery out of Exporting symbols
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1478703 --- Comment #3 from Ralph Bean --- (fedrepo-req-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Exporter-Easy -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1465130] Review Request: nuvola-app-8tracks - 8tracks for Nuvola Player 3
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1465130 --- Comment #6 from Ralph Bean --- (fedrepo-req-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/nuvola-app-8tracks -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1465130] Review Request: nuvola-app-8tracks - 8tracks for Nuvola Player 3
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1465130 --- Comment #7 from Ralph Bean --- (fedrepo-req-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/nuvola-app-8tracks -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1476481] Review Request: perl-AWS-Signature4 - Perl module for creating a version4 signature for Amazon Web Services
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1476481 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2017-08-10 12:53:33 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- perl-AWS-Signature4-1.02-2.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1120788] Review Request: Rex - Tool for Automation, Remote Execution and Configuration Deployment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1120788 Bug 1120788 depends on bug 1476481, which changed state. Bug 1476481 Summary: Review Request: perl-AWS-Signature4 - Perl module for creating a version4 signature for Amazon Web Services https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1476481 What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1476085] Review Request: libsemigroups - C++ library for semigroups and monoids
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1476085 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2017-08-10 12:54:00 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System --- libsemigroups-0.3.1-3.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1467049] Review Request: nuvola-app-deezer - Deezer for Nuvola Player 3
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1467049 --- Comment #7 from Ralph Bean --- (fedrepo-req-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/nuvola-app-deezer -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1467049] Review Request: nuvola-app-deezer - Deezer for Nuvola Player 3
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1467049 --- Comment #6 from Ralph Bean --- (fedrepo-req-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/nuvola-app-deezer -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1467054] Review Request: nuvola-app-google-calendar - Google Calendar web app for Nuvola Player 3
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1467054 --- Comment #6 from Ralph Bean --- (fedrepo-req-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/nuvola-app-google-calendar -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1467054] Review Request: nuvola-app-google-calendar - Google Calendar web app for Nuvola Player 3
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1467054 --- Comment #7 from Ralph Bean --- (fedrepo-req-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/nuvola-app-google-calendar -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1478052] Review Request: nuvola-app-google-play-music - Google Calendar web app for Nuvola Player 3
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1478052 --- Comment #4 from Ralph Bean --- (fedrepo-req-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/nuvola-app-google-play-music -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1478052] Review Request: nuvola-app-google-play-music - Google Calendar web app for Nuvola Player 3
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1478052 --- Comment #5 from Ralph Bean --- (fedrepo-req-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/nuvola-app-google-play-music -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1350884] Review Request: mspgcc - Rebase of GCC for the MSP430 to TI / Red Hat upstream
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1350884 --- Comment #14 from Brandon Nielsen --- (In reply to Elliott Sales de Andrade from comment #13) > For g++ subpackage, I'd check original gcc, maybe. Same for gnulib, > assuming it has also been bundling it. The illegal package name has to do > with including static files in a package name without -static suffix, which > is likely not relevant here. > > I'd say pinging someone from the Embedded SIG might be useful: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Embedded New spec URL: https://bitbucket.org/nielsenb/mspgcc-fedora/raw/e291164cb85b8d82603e5e4f2dc04929f8d5a146/msp430-elf-toolchain.spec New SRPM URL: https://bitbucket.org/nielsenb/mspgcc-fedora/downloads/msp430-elf-toolchain-5.0.0.0-1.src.rpm I split out the C++ stuff. Original gcc doesn't bundle gnulib, but the bundled libiberty is not versioned. I'll check out the Embedded SIG when I get a chance. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1432993] Review Request: hd-idle - Spin down idle [USB] hard disks
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1432993 --- Comment #14 from Ralph Bean --- (fedrepo-req-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/hd-idle -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1432993] Review Request: hd-idle - Spin down idle [USB] hard disks
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1432993 --- Comment #15 from Ralph Bean --- (fedrepo-req-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/hd-idle -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1479707] Review Request: perl-Test-Exit - Test that some code calls exit without terminating testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1479707 --- Comment #2 from Ralph Bean --- (fedrepo-req-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Test-Exit -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1479707] Review Request: perl-Test-Exit - Test that some code calls exit without terminating testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1479707 --- Comment #3 from Ralph Bean --- (fedrepo-req-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Test-Exit -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1479022] Review Request: preeny - Some helpful preload libraries for pwning stuff
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1479022 --- Comment #6 from Ralph Bean --- (fedrepo-req-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/preeny -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1479022] Review Request: preeny - Some helpful preload libraries for pwning stuff
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1479022 --- Comment #7 from Ralph Bean --- (fedrepo-req-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/preeny -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1478705] Review Request: deepin-calendar - Calendar for Deepin Desktop Environment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1478705 --- Comment #6 from Ralph Bean --- (fedrepo-req-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/deepin-calendar -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1478705] Review Request: deepin-calendar - Calendar for Deepin Desktop Environment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1478705 --- Comment #7 from Ralph Bean --- (fedrepo-req-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/deepin-calendar -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1421044] Review Request: deepin-qml-widgets - Deepin QML widgets
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1421044 --- Comment #6 from Ralph Bean --- (fedrepo-req-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/deepin-qml-widgets -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1421044] Review Request: deepin-qml-widgets - Deepin QML widgets
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1421044 --- Comment #7 from Ralph Bean --- (fedrepo-req-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/deepin-qml-widgets -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1421065] Review Request: deepin-qt-dbus-factory - A repository stores auto-generated Qt5 dbus code
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1421065 --- Comment #9 from Ralph Bean --- (fedrepo-req-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/deepin-qt-dbus-factory -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1421065] Review Request: deepin-qt-dbus-factory - A repository stores auto-generated Qt5 dbus code
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1421065 --- Comment #10 from Ralph Bean --- (fedrepo-req-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/deepin-qt-dbus-factory -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1478053] Review Request: nuvola-app-groove - Microsoft Groove for Nuvola Player 3
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1478053 --- Comment #3 from Ralph Bean --- (fedrepo-req-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/nuvola-app-groove -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1478053] Review Request: nuvola-app-groove - Microsoft Groove for Nuvola Player 3
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1478053 --- Comment #4 from Ralph Bean --- (fedrepo-req-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/nuvola-app-groove -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1478059] Review Request: nuvola-app-jango - Jango for Nuvola Player 3
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1478059 --- Comment #5 from Ralph Bean --- (fedrepo-req-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/nuvola-app-jango -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1478059] Review Request: nuvola-app-jango - Jango for Nuvola Player 3
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1478059 --- Comment #6 from Ralph Bean --- (fedrepo-req-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/nuvola-app-jango -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1480130] Review Request: perl-Math-Utils - Useful mathematical functions not in Perl
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1480130 --- Comment #2 from Ralph Bean --- (fedrepo-req-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Math-Utils -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1434746] Review Request: uom-se - Unit Standard (JSR 363) implementation for Java SE 8 and above
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1434746 Lukas Berk changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|brol...@redhat.com |lb...@redhat.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1480130] Review Request: perl-Math-Utils - Useful mathematical functions not in Perl
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1480130 --- Comment #3 from Ralph Bean --- (fedrepo-req-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Math-Utils -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1479844] Review Request: deepin-notifications - System notifications for linuxdeepin desktop environment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1479844 --- Comment #4 from Ralph Bean --- (fedrepo-req-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/deepin-notifications -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1479844] Review Request: deepin-notifications - System notifications for linuxdeepin desktop environment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1479844 --- Comment #5 from Ralph Bean --- (fedrepo-req-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/deepin-notifications -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1427634] Review Request: syncthing - Continuous File Synchronization
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1427634 --- Comment #31 from Ralph Bean --- (fedrepo-req-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/syncthing -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1427634] Review Request: syncthing - Continuous File Synchronization
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1427634 --- Comment #32 from Ralph Bean --- (fedrepo-req-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/syncthing -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1450212] Review Request: pyowm - Python wrapper library for the OpenWeatherMap
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1450212 --- Comment #4 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedrepo-req-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/pyowm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1450212] Review Request: pyowm - Python wrapper library for the OpenWeatherMap
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1450212 --- Comment #5 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedrepo-req-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/pyowm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1441728] Review Request: cld2 - Compact Language Detector 2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1441728 --- Comment #20 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedrepo-req-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/cld2 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1441728] Review Request: cld2 - Compact Language Detector 2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1441728 --- Comment #19 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedrepo-req-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/cld2 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1434746] Review Request: uom-se - Unit Standard (JSR 363) implementation for Java SE 8 and above
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1434746 --- Comment #3 from Ralph Bean --- (fedrepo-req-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/uom-se -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1434746] Review Request: uom-se - Unit Standard (JSR 363) implementation for Java SE 8 and above
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1434746 --- Comment #4 from Ralph Bean --- (fedrepo-req-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/uom-se -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1478052] Review Request: nuvola-app-google-play-music - Google Play integration for Nuvola Player
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1478052 mgans...@alice.de changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |nuvola-app-google-play-musi |nuvola-app-google-play-musi |c - Google Calendar web app |c - Google Play integration |for Nuvola Player 3 |for Nuvola Player -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1469331] Review Request: fedrepo-req - A CLI tool that provides an easy way to submit ticket requests for packaging tasks in Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1469331 --- Comment #42 from Fedora Update System --- fedrepo-req-1.0.0-1.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-8dc36fc7bb -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1469331] Review Request: fedrepo-req - A CLI tool that provides an easy way to submit ticket requests for packaging tasks in Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1469331 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1476481] Review Request: perl-AWS-Signature4 - Perl module for creating a version4 signature for Amazon Web Services
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1476481 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- perl-AWS-Signature4-1.02-2.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1479967] Review Request: fritzing-parts - Parts library for the Fritzing electronic design application
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1479967 --- Comment #2 from Ed Marshall --- Spec URL: https://fedorapeople.org/~logic/fritzing-parts/fritzing-parts.spec SRPM URL: https://fedorapeople.org/~logic/fritzing-parts/fritzing-parts-0.9.2b-1.fc27.src.rpm Description: Fritzing is a free software tool to support designers, artists and hobbyists to work creatively with interactive electronics. The fritzing-parts package contains a library of part definitions, including both meta-data and related graphics. Fedora Account System Username: logic Thanks for catching those! - I've yanked the Group: tag, and I'll pull it from Fritzing itself the next time I issue an update. - I've punted entirely on the patches, since as of the next update (which will follow on the heels of this pretty quickly) those scripts won't even exist anymore (which was the reason for both patches: fixing hashbang lines, and an outdated FSF address, to make fedora-review happy). So, I've pulled the obsolete parts scripts entirely, and both patches. - I had no idea that URL would work with Github! This is so much better than the reference trick I was using (which I'm sure I borrowed from an old mailing list thread at some point), thank you! - Yanked defattr, will get rid of it in Fritzing itself with the next release too. Koji scratch build is at: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=21155649 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 187314] Review Request: perl-Data-HexDump
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=187314 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Authen-Radius-0.26-4.el7, perl-Data-HexDump-0.02-26.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 187313] Review Request: perl-Authen-Radius
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=187313 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Authen-Radius-0.26-4.el7, perl-Data-HexDump-0.02-26.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1404043] Review Request: rdma-core - RDMA core userspace libraries and daemons
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1404043 Honggang LI changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||needinfo?(ke...@scrye.com) --- Comment #37 from Honggang LI --- (In reply to Kevin Fenzi from comment #33) > So, the problem is actually that the old libibverbs package had no > dependency on perl, but this new one (subpackage of rdma-core) does. This > results in the rawhide composes failing because lorax prunes out perl and > then the /usr/bin/rxe_cfg script has no perl and errors out. > > So, very short term I have just untagged rdma-core again, so we can > hopefully get a rawhide compose today or this weekend. Hi, Kevin Fedora-rawhide lorax addressed the perl package issue, and we had rebuilt rdma-core with all known issues got fixed. I checked my fedora-rawhide virtual machine, only old rdma package available. What we need to do to replace the old rdma package with the new rdma-core package? > Slightly longer term, we have put in a PR to make lorax not prune perl: > https://github.com/rhinstaller/lorax/pull/228 once thats merged and in a > rawhide lorax build we can retag or rebuild rdma-core > > Longer term still, it would sure be nice if we didn't have to have perl on > minimal images. I don't know how important rxe_cfg is or if it could be > re-written to work with system-python or as a binary, but that would sure be > nice > to drop the dep on perl here. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1479967] Review Request: fritzing-parts - Parts library for the Fritzing electronic design application
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1479967 --- Comment #3 from Robert-André Mauchin (afk until next Thu) --- There are some issues with the licences, some files are GPLv2+ and some other GPLv3+: *No copyright* CC0 -- fritzing-parts-0.9.2b/svg/obsolete/pcb/SparkFun-LCC20_SparkFun.svg fritzing-parts-0.9.2b/svg/obsolete/pcb/SparkFun-LPCC20_SparkFun.svg CC by - fritzing-parts-0.9.2b/part-gen-scripts/obsolete/fullbreadboardgenerator/documentation/resources/guide_style.css GPL (v2 or later) (with incorrect FSF address) -- fritzing-parts-0.9.2b/part-gen-scripts/obsolete/footgen/footgen.py GPL (v3 or later) - fritzing-parts-0.9.2b/part-gen-scripts/obsolete/dilPackageGenerator/generator.py fritzing-parts-0.9.2b/part-gen-scripts/obsolete/fullbreadboardgenerator/generator.py fritzing-parts-0.9.2b/part-gen-scripts/obsolete/resistorSetGenerator/valuesAndColors_forResistors.py It should be reflected in the License: tag - I think you should add a specific verion of fritzing in the Requires tag otherwiseit will conflicts with lower version of fritzing. Package Review == Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed Issues: === - Package installs properly. Note: Installation errors (see attachment) See: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines = MUST items = Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [!]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "GPL (v2 or later) (with incorrect FSF address)", "CC by", "GPL (v3 or later)", "Unknown or generated", "*No copyright* CC0". 8576 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/bob/packaging/review/fritzing-parts/review-fritzing- parts/licensecheck.txt [ ]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. Note: Dirs in package are owned also by: /usr/share/fritzing/parts/svg/contrib/breadboard(fritzing), /usr/share/fritzing/parts/svg/core/breadboard(fritzing), /usr/share/fritzing/parts/svg/obsolete(fritzing), /usr/share/fritzing/parts/svg/contrib(fritzing), /usr/share/fritzing/parts/svg/user/schematic(fritzing), /usr/share/fritzing/parts/obsolete(fritzing), /usr/share/fritzing/parts(fritzing), /usr/share/fritzing/parts/svg/core/icon(fritzing), /usr/share/fritzing/parts/svg/contrib/pcb(fritzing), /usr/share/fritzing/parts/svg/core(fritzing), /usr/share/fritzing/parts/subparts2d/breadboard(fritzing), /usr/share/fritzing/parts/svg/obsolete/icon(fritzing), /usr/share/fritzing/parts/svg/contrib/schematic(fritzing), /usr/share/fritzing/parts/svg/user(fritzing), /usr/share/fritzing/parts/subparts(fritzing), /usr/share/fritzing/parts/core(fritzing), /usr/share/fritzing/parts/svg/core/pcb(fritzing), /usr/share/fritzing(fritzing), /usr/share/fritzing/parts/svg/contrib/icon(fritzing), /usr/share/fritzing/parts/user(fritzing), /usr/share/fritzing/parts/svg/user/icon(fritzing), /usr/share/fritzing/parts/svg/obsolete/pcb(fritzing), /usr/share/fritzing/parts/svg/core/schematic(fritzing), /usr/share/fritzing/parts/subparts2d(fritzing), /usr/share/fritzing/parts/svg/obsolete/breadboard(fritzing), /usr/share/fritzing/parts/svg/user/breadboard(fritzing), /usr/share/fritzing/parts/subparts/breadboard(fritzing), /usr/share/fritzing/parts/svg(fritzing), /usr/share/fritzing/parts/svg/user/pcb(fritzing), /usr/share/fritzing/parts/contrib(fritzing), /usr/share/fritzing/parts/svg/obsolete/schematic(fritzing) [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [-]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files. [x]: Package
[Bug 1256051] Review Request: ghc-sandi - Data encoding library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256051 --- Comment #5 from Elliott Sales de Andrade --- Spec is 404 again. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1256058] Review Request: ghc-fdo-notify - Desktop Notifications client
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256058 --- Comment #4 from Elliott Sales de Andrade --- Spec is 404 again. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org