[PacketFence-users] updating my.cnf on a separate DB servers

2017-03-13 Thread Morris, Andi
Hi all, In previous PF environments I've always performed MySQL tuning by updating my.cnf, stopping PF services and then restarting. If I have a separate DB server to the PF server can I get away with just restarting MySQL on the DB server, or do I still need to stop and start the services on

Re: [PacketFence-users] upgrade 6.2.1-6.4 - radius no longer starting

2017-01-05 Thread Morris, Andi
is specific to your setup) In your case, just add the following to the default realm options: auth_pool = eduroam nostrip Cheers - Julien On 2017-01-03 11:26 AM, Morris, Andi wrote: Hi all, upgrading my 6.2.1 to 6.4 running CentOS 7.3.1611 release today has resulted in my radiusd and radiusd-acct

[PacketFence-users] upgrade 6.2.1-6.4 - radius no longer starting

2017-01-03 Thread Morris, Andi
Hi all, upgrading my 6.2.1 to 6.4 running CentOS 7.3.1611 release today has resulted in my radiusd and radiusd-acct services not starting. Firstly I was getting the following error: service|command httpd.admin|already started Checking configuration sanity... WARNING - Cannot open the following

Re: [PacketFence-users] PacketFence v7 - Will clustering be easier?

2016-12-13 Thread Morris, Andi
Hi, I’ve used PF in a clustered environment previously (version 5) and had more downtime because of it than I did without. This wasn’t directly an issue with PacketFence, but with the way that DRDB ties in with the Linux kernel, and how to maintain an up to date kernel whilst running this

[PacketFence-users] Fortigate SSO

2016-11-22 Thread Morris, Andi
Hi all, I'm trying to configure our Packetfence Guest setup (6.2.1) to send radius accounting data to our fortigates in order to see the username in the firewall logs, rather than just the IP. As far as I can see everything is configured correctly, as per the guide here:

Re: [PacketFence-users] Captive Portal and SSL - Unresolvable task?

2016-11-21 Thread Morris, Andi
Hi all, A quick update on this, disabling the Captive Portal Bypass mechanism option and keeping wispr enabled seems to have resolved this. More testing to be done, but it looks good so far. Cheers, Andi From: Morris, Andi [mailto:amor...@cardiffmet.ac.uk] Sent: 15 November 2016 09:24

Re: [PacketFence-users] Captive Portal and SSL - Unresolvable task?

2016-11-15 Thread Morris, Andi
HI all, Sorry to bump an old ish topic, but this is an issue we're seeing a lot of. Users are seeing the HSTS error when trying to connect to our Guest network and I'm not sure the best way around this, if there's any way at all. In our config (6.2.1) we have both captive portal detection

Re: [PacketFence-users] Security Onion alerts not triggering

2016-10-14 Thread Morris, Andi
:20 To: Morris, Andi <amor...@cardiffmet.ac.uk>; packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [PacketFence-users] Security Onion alerts not triggering Hi, I created a unit test (https://github.com/inverse-inc/packetfence/pull/1759) and can validate that the "security_on

Re: [PacketFence-users] Security Onion alerts not triggering

2016-10-13 Thread Morris, Andi
Thanks Thierry, this fixed my issue. Cheers, Andi From: Thierry Laurion [mailto:tlaur...@inverse.ca] Sent: 07 October 2016 18:09 To: packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net Cc: Morris, Andi <amor...@cardiffmet.ac.uk> Subject: Re: [PacketFence-users] Security Onion alerts not triggeri

Re: [PacketFence-users] Security Onion alerts not triggering

2016-10-07 Thread Morris, Andi
max_enable=10 desc=P2P Vuze enabled=Y template=p2p grace=2h From: Morris, Andi [mailto:amor...@cardiffmet.ac.uk] Sent: 07 October 2016 14:56 To: packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: [PacketFence-users] Security Onion alerts not triggering Hi all, I have configured my security onion server

[PacketFence-users] Security Onion alerts not triggering

2016-10-07 Thread Morris, Andi
Hi all, I have configured my security onion server to send alerts to my packetfence server (version 6.2.1), and I can see that they're getting there through TCPdump. IDS server: 13:37:02.260031 IP idsserver.internal.domain.35871 > packetfence.internal.domain.syslog: SYSLOG user.notice, length:

Re: [PacketFence-users] maintenance script with remote database

2016-09-29 Thread Morris, Andi
@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [PacketFence-users] maintenance script with remote database On Sep 28, 2016, at 11:55 AM, Morris, Andi <amor...@cardiffmet.ac.uk<mailto:amor...@cardiffmet.ac.uk>> wrote: Apologies, I mean the database cleaner script being run remotely, not the

Re: [PacketFence-users] maintenance script with remote database

2016-09-28 Thread Morris, Andi
Apologies, I mean the database cleaner script being run remotely, not the optimisation. From: Morris, Andi Sent: 28 September 2016 16:52 To: 'packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net' <packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net> Subject: RE: [PacketFence-users] maintenance script with

Re: [PacketFence-users] maintenance script with remote database

2016-09-28 Thread Morris, Andi
: [PacketFence-users] maintenance script with remote database On Sep 28, 2016, at 10:34 AM, Morris, Andi <amor...@cardiffmet.ac.uk<mailto:amor...@cardiffmet.ac.uk>> wrote: Hi Louis, That makes sense, but in practice I get errors when running this on a server that hasn’t had packetfen

Re: [PacketFence-users] maintenance script with remote database

2016-09-28 Thread Morris, Andi
, depending on how it's configured. Makes sense? On Sep 27, 2016, at 9:14 AM, Morris, Andi <amor...@cardiffmet.ac.uk<mailto:amor...@cardiffmet.ac.uk>> wrote: Hi, An update to this. It does seem to work well if the packetfence server is also running the mariadb service. Mine wasn’

Re: [PacketFence-users] maintenance script with remote database

2016-09-27 Thread Morris, Andi
be sent to the user designated for PF alerts? If not, is there scope for this to be added as an option? Cheers, Andi From: Morris, Andi [mailto:amor...@cardiffmet.ac.uk] Sent: 21 September 2016 10:16 To: packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: [PacketFence-users] maintenance script

[PacketFence-users] maintenance script with remote database

2016-09-21 Thread Morris, Andi
Hi all, I've recently moved to a setup which has a remote database server, and I was wondering whether the regular addons/database-backup-and-maintenance.sh file will still run from the packetfence server to the remote DB server. I can see the flags inside the script calling for the database

Re: [PacketFence-users] parking violation bug?

2016-09-15 Thread Morris, Andi
Nobody else has seen this then? I can't work out why my parking violations are triggering after such a short period. Cheers, Andi From: Morris, Andi [mailto:amor...@cardiffmet.ac.uk] Sent: 07 September 2016 12:50 To: packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: [PacketFence-users] parking

Re: [PacketFence-users] Block port scanning

2016-09-15 Thread Morris, Andi
You could use snort to trigger on signatures related to port scanning and send the culprit into the isolation VLAN. Cheers, Andi From: Jonathan Brown [mailto:jbr...@fmcllc.com] Sent: 14 September 2016 16:27 To: packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: [PacketFence-users] Block port

[PacketFence-users] parking violation bug?

2016-09-07 Thread Morris, Andi
Hi all, I've setup parking to trap devices that have been in the setup portal for over 3600 seconds, however I noticed a huge amount of users were triggering the violation. After doing some testing with my own phone I found that this was triggering after just 9 minutes. I can't see how I've

[PacketFence-users] Users connecting to registration network getting "not found in database" message

2016-08-22 Thread Morris, Andi
Hi all, I'm getting some strange errors when smartphones connect to my registration network in order to register themselves as a guest. They see an error saying that their device was not found in the packetfence database. Interestingly the IP address displayed on the user's screen was

[PacketFence-users] Error running configurator in 6.2.1

2016-08-09 Thread Morris, Andi
Hi all, I'm getting a similar issue on two separate CentOS 7 servers that I've setup today. I get through the configurator up until the service start section, but when I do httpd.graphite never starts. Restarting the services from the CLI gets the following result: bin/pfcmd service pf restart

[PacketFence-users] Load balancing and HA for Packetfence 6.x

2016-08-04 Thread Morris, Andi
Hi all, Just curious what the communities' solutions were for high availability with their packetfence setups. We've recently purchased some hardware load balancers, which gives us more options for load balancing than we had previously, so I was considering the following setup? 1 x database

Re: [PacketFence-users] sponsored access

2016-07-13 Thread Morris, Andi
Any thoughts on this guys? Cheers, Andi From: Morris, Andi [mailto:amor...@cardiffmet.ac.uk] Sent: 08 July 2016 15:19 To: packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [PacketFence-users] sponsored access Apologies for the barrage of emails. I think this is now something to do

Re: [PacketFence-users] sponsored access

2016-07-08 Thread Morris, Andi
ly 2016 14:32 To: packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [PacketFence-users] sponsored access As an update, this isn't happening with a laptop, so might be something to do with the Android device, but something is definitely stopping it communicating with whatever part of the interne

Re: [PacketFence-users] sponsored access

2016-07-08 Thread Morris, Andi
to the captive portal detection for this OS version? Cheers, Andi From: Morris, Andi [mailto:amor...@cardiffmet.ac.uk] Sent: 07 July 2016 15:15 To: packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: [PacketFence-users] sponsored access Hi all, I'm having trouble with my sponsored guest access where

[PacketFence-users] sponsored access

2016-07-07 Thread Morris, Andi
Hi all, I'm having trouble with my sponsored guest access where the registration isn't completing until the guest node leaves and then reconnects to the captive portal, when packetfence then sees the registered mac address and puts the node in the correct vlan. This doesn't seem to be

Re: [PacketFence-users] Still a problem with registration process

2016-06-10 Thread Morris, Andi
for your help. I'll try to wait until 6.1 is released before pushing this into production. A horrible question I know, but do you know a rough timescale for this release? Cheers, Andi From: Morris, Andi [mailto:amor...@cardiffmet.ac.uk] Sent: 10 June 2016 09:20 To: packetfence-users

Re: [PacketFence-users] Still a problem with registration process

2016-06-10 Thread Morris, Andi
, at 6:02 , Morris, Andi <amor...@cardiffmet.ac.uk<mailto:amor...@cardiffmet.ac.uk>> wrote: Hi Louis, I needed to reinstall as I messed something up, so this is with the patch file on a completely CentOS 7.2.1511 vanilla 6.0.3 installation just after completing the configurator. pat

Re: [PacketFence-users] SAML authentication

2016-06-10 Thread Morris, Andi
Subject: Re: [PacketFence-users] SAML authentication Hi Andi, SAML is not currently available as a login option when granting sponsorship. So you're not mis-configuring it. Its just not there :) - Julien On 2016-06-08 11:53 AM, Morris, Andi wrote: Hi, I'm trying to setup SAML authentication for my

[PacketFence-users] SAML authentication

2016-06-08 Thread Morris, Andi
Hi, I'm trying to setup SAML authentication for my users connecting to sponsor a guest, and also potentially for my admin users, however I can't seem to get packetfence to attempt to authenticate the users with this source. I've even tried pushing the SAML section right to the top of the

Re: [PacketFence-users] Still a problem with registration process

2016-06-07 Thread Morris, Andi
When applying that patch do I need to rename the x.y.z files in the diff file to match my current version, and then create the relevant files? My patch dry run is failing because the files don’t currently exist. Apologies, I’m a git/patch noob Cheers, Andi From: Morris, Andi [mailto:amor

Re: [PacketFence-users] Still a problem with registration process

2016-06-07 Thread Morris, Andi
, but has implemented his own fix. Cheers, Andi From: Louis Munro [mailto:lmu...@inverse.ca] Sent: 06 June 2016 20:27 To: packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [PacketFence-users] Still a problem with registration process On Jun 6, 2016, at 11:05 , Morris, Andi <a

Re: [PacketFence-users] Still a problem with registration process

2016-06-06 Thread Morris, Andi
ver there is nothing at all in the packetfence.log Cheers, Andi From: Morris, Andi [mailto:amor...@cardiffmet.ac.uk] Sent: 06 June 2016 15:55 To: packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [PacketFence-users] Still a problem with registration process On my current reverse proxy solution

Re: [PacketFence-users] Still a problem with registration process

2016-06-06 Thread Morris, Andi
, at 10:19 , Morris, Andi <amor...@cardiffmet.ac.uk<mailto:amor...@cardiffmet.ac.uk>> wrote: Hi Andrew, I’m also seeing the exact same issue. Users choose to register by email, then click the email validation link and get a message to say they must use the same device to v

Re: [PacketFence-users] Mandatory fields on guest signup page

2016-06-03 Thread Morris, Andi
//www.packetfence.org>) On Jun 3, 2016, at 03:19, Morris, Andi <amor...@cardiffmet.ac.uk<mailto:amor...@cardiffmet.ac.uk>> wrote: Hi Derek, I’ve done this by editing the HTML code within the portal pages. I’m going to try this using the new portal config methods in version 6.x tod

[PacketFence-users] Access to portal for guest activation

2016-06-03 Thread Morris, Andi
Hi all, On version <6.0.3 I was able to access the management IP on port 443 in order for sponsors to activate guests. However, now I'm seeing the server refuse the connection. Looking at the output for netstat I'm not seeing the management interface listening on ports 80 or 443. Do I have to

Re: [PacketFence-users] Mandatory fields on guest signup page

2016-06-03 Thread Morris, Andi
//www.packetfence.org>) On Jun 2, 2016, at 06:18, Morris, Andi <amor...@cardiffmet.ac.uk<mailto:amor...@cardiffmet.ac.uk>> wrote: Hi all, I’ve been battling with customising the interface for the Guest wifi signup page here and management want it to be as simple as possible. I’m getting

Re: [PacketFence-users] Mandatory fields on guest signup page

2016-06-02 Thread Morris, Andi
I should have mentioned that this is version 5.7.0 for the moment. Perhaps this is easier with the new version 6 interface? I'll happily update if this is the case as my system is just in dev at the moment. Cheers, Andi From: Morris, Andi Sent: 02 June 2016 11:19 To: packetfence-users

Re: [PacketFence-users] computer / user auth when onsite and offsite

2016-05-04 Thread Morris, Andi
s database? Cheers, Andi -Original Message----- From: Morris, Andi [mailto:amor...@cardiffmet.ac.uk] Sent: 04 May 2016 15:00 To: packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [PacketFence-users] computer / user auth when onsite and offsite Essentially the logic would be: If domain_PC

Re: [PacketFence-users] computer / user auth when onsite and offsite

2016-05-04 Thread Morris, Andi
Original Message----- From: Morris, Andi [mailto:amor...@cardiffmet.ac.uk] Sent: 04 May 2016 14:37 To: packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [PacketFence-users] computer / user auth when onsite and offsite Hi Fabrice, Thanks for your reply. That looks good, although I'd need to add all o

Re: [PacketFence-users] computer / user auth when onsite and offsite

2016-05-04 Thread Morris, Andi
Regards Fabrice Le Mercredi, Mai 04, 2016 08:53 EDT, "Morris, Andi" <amor...@cardiffmet.ac.uk> a écrit: > Hi all, > > I'm trying to work out a way to have domain PCs to authenticate with computer > auth, but the device falling back to user auth so that if

[PacketFence-users] computer / user auth when onsite and offsite

2016-05-04 Thread Morris, Andi
Hi all, I'm trying to work out a way to have domain PCs to authenticate with computer auth, but the device falling back to user auth so that if it's offsite it will use the user auth credentials to authenticate at other eduroam sites. What's happening at the moment is that the device

Re: [PacketFence-users] more vlan filter questions

2016-04-29 Thread Morris, Andi
2016-04-29 06:55, Morris, Andi a écrit : Hi again all, Is there a way to set access duration in vlan filters? I can see the options there, but I can't get them to work. Currently I evaluate the node role each time the user is authenticated using: [2:home_user] scope = RegisteredRole role

[PacketFence-users] more vlan filter questions

2016-04-29 Thread Morris, Andi
Hi again all, Is there a way to set access duration in vlan filters? I can see the options there, but I can't get them to work. Currently I evaluate the node role each time the user is authenticated using: [2:home_user] scope = RegisteredRole role = eduroam_home action = modify_node

Re: [PacketFence-users] autoreg with vlan filter not working

2016-04-29 Thread Morris, Andi
rse.ca<mailto:jrouz...@inverse.ca> :: +1.514.447.4918 (x115) :: http://www.inverse.ca Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (http://www.sogo.nu) and PacketFence (http://www.packetfence.org) On 2016-04-28 12:44 PM, Morris, Andi wrote: Hey all, A bump of an old topic, but it still seems to

Re: [PacketFence-users] autoreg with vlan filter not working

2016-04-28 Thread Morris, Andi
]\.[Aa][Cc]\.[Uu][Kk]$|.+@[Uu][Ww][Ii][Cc]\.[Aa][Cc]\.[Uu][Kk]$<mailto:.+@[Cc][Aa][Rr][Dd][Ii][Ff][Ff][Mm][Ee][Tt]\.%5bAa%5d%5bCc%5d\.%5bUu%5d%5bKk%5d$|.+@%5bUu%5d%5bWw%5d%5bIi%5d%5bCc%5d\.%5bAa%5d%5bCc%5d\.%5bUu%5d%5bKk%5d$>) Cheers, Andi From: Morris, Andi [mailto:amor...@cardiffmet.ac.uk

[PacketFence-users] Logging into captive portal against AD with username@realm

2016-03-29 Thread Morris, Andi
Hi, Hopefully just a quick one. I know it's pretty easy to setup Packetfence to be able to authenticate users against active directory in order to register devices using their standard account name, however I was wondering whether it's possible to allow the user to login/register in the

Re: [PacketFence-users] mschap rejecting known good user

2016-03-29 Thread Morris, Andi
lm_auth --username=testuser --challenge=ddd77a598cbc5038 --nt-response=ad6d3d357eafbfaa11185d03da4a1771b1222c9f7a6c581f --request-nt-key 2016-03-23 15:28 GMT+01:00 Morris, Andi <amor...@cardiffmet.ac.uk<mailto:amor...@cardiffmet.ac.uk>>: Hi all, I’m looking to port our current working

Re: [PacketFence-users] dot1x auth when soh is enabled

2016-03-19 Thread Morris, Andi
Hi Louis, Co-incidentally earlier today I had a conversation with a colleague about getting posture checking with dot1x auth and windows clients and I suggested Packetfence for the solution. If you discontinue SoH, is there something on the roadmap that would be its equivalent? Cheers, Andi

Re: [PacketFence-users] Sponsor Registration

2016-03-19 Thread Morris, Andi
Hi Brian, 1 - The sponsor is recorded against the owner of the device. Maybe this works for you? 2 - You could use SAML authentication for single sign on if you have a SAML based IdP e.g. ADFS/Shibboleth. This would mean that your sponsors wouldn't have to keep logging in. Cheers, Andi

Re: [PacketFence-users] dot1x auth when soh is enabled

2016-03-19 Thread Morris, Andi
-users] dot1x auth when soh is enabled On Mar 17, 2016, at 10:41 , Morris, Andi <amor...@cardiffmet.ac.uk<mailto:amor...@cardiffmet.ac.uk>> wrote: Hi Louis, Co-incidentally earlier today I had a conversation with a colleague about getting posture checking with dot1x auth and win

Re: [PacketFence-users] bypassing AUP

2016-03-15 Thread Morris, Andi
in login.html which you can reproduce in other pages. [%# AUP %] Comment the whole AUP section, and change the input as shown. Thank you On 03/15/2016 12:31 PM, Morris, Andi wrote: Hi all, I need to edit the registration form so that users don't see the AUP

[PacketFence-users] bypassing AUP

2016-03-15 Thread Morris, Andi
Hi all, I need to edit the registration form so that users don't see the AUP (this will be provided in a separate link). I've removed the section from the guest.html, but when I register I see an error telling me that I haven't accepted the AUP. Is there a way to override this check? Cheers,

Re: [PacketFence-users] autoreg with vlan filter not working

2016-03-03 Thread Morris, Andi
lan filter not working Hi Andi, replace match by regex. Regards Fabrice Le 2016-03-03 06:43, Morris, Andi a écrit : Hi, Running version 5.7.0 on CentOS. I'm trying to get autoreg working through vlan_filters like I have on my 5.0.1 production install but it doesn't seem to be taking effect

[PacketFence-users] autoreg with vlan filter not working

2016-03-03 Thread Morris, Andi
Hi, Running version 5.7.0 on CentOS. I'm trying to get autoreg working through vlan_filters like I have on my 5.0.1 production install but it doesn't seem to be taking effect and new devices are being sent into the registration network after a radius access-accept message. My vlan filter is as

Re: [PacketFence-users] Installing with separate database server

2016-02-29 Thread Morris, Andi
) and PacketFence (http://www.packetfence.org) On 2016-02-26 9:58 AM, Morris, Andi wrote: > Hi James, > Yes, thanks, I've done that. Apologies my last email was terribly formatted > somehow. > > I still cannot start the services due to this kill error. I may just rebuild > the s

Re: [PacketFence-users] Installing with separate database server

2016-02-26 Thread Morris, Andi
...@inverse.ca :: +1.514.447.4918 (x115) :: http://www.inverse.ca Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (http://www.sogo.nu) and PacketFence (http://www.packetfence.org) On 2016-02-26 7:13 AM, Morris, Andi wrote: > Thanks for your help Fabrice, > > OK, so this isn't working as it supposedly should.

Re: [PacketFence-users] Installing with separate database server

2016-02-26 Thread Morris, Andi
Actually, this appears to be ingrained with the install (CentOS 6.7) as putting the two database references back also displays this message. I'm not sure how the services started ok when I first installed the server and ran through the wizard. -Original Message- From: Morris, Andi

Re: [PacketFence-users] Installing with separate database server

2016-02-26 Thread Morris, Andi
2016 16:03 To: packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [PacketFence-users] Installing with separate database server Importance: Low Yes exactly, mysql is a dependency but disable it when the system start. Le Jeudi, Février 25, 2016 10:49 EST, "Morris, Andi" <amor...@car

Re: [PacketFence-users] Installing with separate database server

2016-02-25 Thread Morris, Andi
). Regards Fabrice Le Jeudi, Février 25, 2016 08:15 EST, "Morris, Andi" <amor...@cardiffmet.ac.uk> a écrit: > Hi all. > Just wondering what the best practice is for installing packetfence with a > separate mysql database server. Do I need to install packetfence on t

[PacketFence-users] Installing with separate database server

2016-02-25 Thread Morris, Andi
Hi all. Just wondering what the best practice is for installing packetfence with a separate mysql database server. Do I need to install packetfence on the main server without the mysql elements? If so, what's the best way to do that so that I don't miss out a vital dependency when installing

Re: [PacketFence-users] Admin GUI - Node details slow.

2016-02-25 Thread Morris, Andi
l have it on the system if I really need to find it. To gain >>> easy access to the DB, I have an older version of phpMyAdmin (4.2.2 >>> because newer version are not compatible with the CentOS Source >>> Distribution of MySQL) >> >>> -- Gregory A. Thomas Studen

[PacketFence-users] Guest user default page

2016-02-04 Thread Morris, Andi
Hi all, Is there a way to make the default captive portal page the signup page rather than the login page? As a spin off to this, could the signup page then have a link on it pointing to the login page? So basically, the reverse of how it is out of the box? Cheers, Andi

[PacketFence-users] Questions on violations and captive portal controls

2016-01-13 Thread Morris, Andi
Hi all, I'm looking to make some adjustments to how we have our PacketFence NAC solution setup which is controlling our eduroam wireless network. To start with, please let me explain our workflow: User connects to open SSID, where they are redirected to our wifi setup portal containing several

Re: [PacketFence-users] Admin GUI - Node details slow.

2016-01-12 Thread Morris, Andi
Just to note, I also see this issue. If as a result of Jake's question there comes some routine maintenance that should be done on the database, please let me know. I already run the built in maintenance script, but I notice that I have several fragmented tables in the sql tuner results, I'm

Re: [PacketFence-users] Admin GUI - Node details slow.

2016-01-12 Thread Morris, Andi
Student Life Support Specialist University of Wisconsin-Parkside thom...@uwp.edu 262.595.2432 -Original Message- From: Morris, Andi [mailto:amor...@cardiffmet.ac.uk] Sent: Tuesday, January 12, 2016 7:01 AM To: packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [PacketFence-users] Admin

Re: [PacketFence-users] 5.0.2 is out

2016-01-08 Thread Morris, Andi
Hi again, I've found the bug and the fix on github. I'm not familiar with github at all though, can anyone please advise me how I can patch the files? https://github.com/inverse-inc/packetfence/commit/d9c88a93aa11348d33d350e0871a3880e21126f1 Cheers, Andi From: Morris, Andi [mailto:amor

Re: [PacketFence-users] 5.0.2 is out

2016-01-08 Thread Morris, Andi
/d9c88a93aa11348d33d350e0871a3880e21126f1.diff patch -p1 --dry-run < d9c88a93aa11348d33d350e0871a3880e21126f1.diff all is ok, there is no conflict ? patch -p1 < d9c88a93aa11348d33d350e0871a3880e21126f1.diff bin/pfcmd service httpd.portal restart Regards Fabrice Le 2016-01-08 07:06, Morris, Andi a écrit : Hi

Re: [PacketFence-users] 5.0.2 is out

2016-01-07 Thread Morris, Andi
Hi all, Sorry to bump a very old thread, but I'm running version 5.0.1 and am in no position to upgrade my current production system at the moment. I've also just started utilising violations in anger, and have found that users clicking the Enable Network button do not get put back on the main

Re: [PacketFence-users] radius authorization interval

2015-11-12 Thread Morris, Andi
) and PacketFence (www.packetfence.org<http://www.packetfence.org>) On Nov 11, 2015, at 3:42 AM, Morris, Andi <amor...@cardiffmet.ac.uk<mailto:amor...@cardiffmet.ac.uk>> wrote: Hi Derek, Thanks for your reply, as always. I’ve reproduced this on another packetfence box where I can see the w

Re: [PacketFence-users] radius authorization interval

2015-11-11 Thread Morris, Andi
. :: Leaders behind SOGo (www.sogo.nu<http://www.sogo.nu>) and PacketFence (www.packetfence.org<http://www.packetfence.org>) On Nov 9, 2015, at 12:09 PM, Morris, Andi <amor...@cardiffmet.ac.uk<mailto:amor...@cardiffmet.ac.uk>> wrote: Hi all, I’m getting reports of u

[PacketFence-users] radius authorization interval

2015-11-09 Thread Morris, Andi
Hi all, I'm getting reports of users being briefly disconnected from the wireless network every few minutes, which is something that didn't used to happen when users were connected to another SSID using exactly the same hardware (Cisco WLC). I'm wondering if it's something like radius

Re: [PacketFence-users] Cisco Wireless LAN Controller WLC Session Timeout Setting

2015-11-05 Thread Morris, Andi
Sorry for an old thread bump, but we see this also on Cisco WLCs. Some client devices will visibly disconnect the user from the network and then reauthenticate. We actually see it every few minutes. We also have users saying that xbox live disconnects every few minutes when run through our

Re: [PacketFence-users] Registered devices sitting in captive portal

2015-11-04 Thread Morris, Andi
= status value = reg [reg_network] filter = ssid operator = is value = setup_wifi [block_reg_devices:reg_devices_network] scope = NormalVlan role = blocked Le Mercredi, Novembre 04, 2015 07:34 EST, "Morris, Andi" <amor...@cardiffmet.ac.uk> a écrit: > Thanks Fabric

Re: [PacketFence-users] Registered devices sitting in captive portal

2015-11-04 Thread Morris, Andi
then it's suppose to go on a production vlan, not the registration vlan ?! Regards Fabrice Le 2015-11-04 06:16, Morris, Andi a écrit : Now I have the vlan_filters in front of me, does this look doable? [reg_devices] filter = node_info operator = is attribute = status value = reg [reg_network] fil

Re: [PacketFence-users] Registered devices sitting in captive portal

2015-11-04 Thread Morris, Andi
Now I have the vlan_filters in front of me, does this look doable? [reg_devices] filter = node_info operator = is attribute = status value = reg [reg_network] filter = ssid operator = is value = setup_wifi [block_reg_devices:reg_devices_network] role = blocked Cheers, Andi From: Morris, Andi

[PacketFence-users] Registered devices sitting in captive portal

2015-11-03 Thread Morris, Andi
Hi all, I'm still having a large problem with devices sitting in my captive portal, and as such using up a lot of PF resources. With others help on here I've setup a violation that I can trigger if I see a device sitting in there for too long, and I've managed to get any long term devices off

Re: [PacketFence-users] Recommended setup for HA and efficiency

2015-10-23 Thread Morris, Andi
] Recommended setup for HA and efficiency Set the role vlan to -1. That should return reject. Sent from my iPhone On Oct 22, 2015, at 11:17 AM, Morris, Andi <amor...@cardiffmet.ac.uk<mailto:amor...@cardiffmet.ac.uk>> wrote: I’ve been working on this today, and have successf

Re: [PacketFence-users] Recommended setup for HA and efficiency

2015-10-23 Thread Morris, Andi
All sorted, I needed to enable mac authentication on the setup network. Thanks all. From: Morris, Andi [mailto:amor...@cardiffmet.ac.uk] Sent: 23 October 2015 09:56 To: packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [PacketFence-users] Recommended setup for HA and efficiency That works

Re: [PacketFence-users] edited violations.conf outside of GUI - now errors

2015-10-22 Thread Morris, Andi
p://www.sogo.nu>) and PacketFence (www.packetfence.org<http://www.packetfence.org>) On Oct 22, 2015, at 15:19 , Morris, Andi <amor...@cardiffmet.ac.uk<mailto:amor...@cardiffmet.ac.uk>> wrote: Hi Louis, I've tried this already unfortunately. I've tried configreload hard service packetfenc

Re: [PacketFence-users] edited violations.conf outside of GUI - now errors

2015-10-22 Thread Morris, Andi
cketfence.org<http://www.packetfence.org>) On Oct 22, 2015, at 15:35 , Morris, Andi <amor...@cardiffmet.ac.uk<mailto:amor...@cardiffmet.ac.uk>> wrote: I did have that file, I removed it and ran a configreload hard but I still get the error. I tried a service restart again, still not

Re: [PacketFence-users] Recommended setup for HA and efficiency

2015-10-22 Thread Morris, Andi
Move MySQL to a different server on fast storage. I run 2 MySQL vms in ha on ssd storage and that helps. Sent from my iPhone On Oct 21, 2015, at 12:37 PM, Morris, Andi <amor...@cardiffmet.ac.uk<mailto:amor...@cardiffmet.ac.uk>> wrote: Hi all, I’ve recently come into some issues with th

Re: [PacketFence-users] Recommended setup for HA and efficiency

2015-10-22 Thread Morris, Andi
: Re: [PacketFence-users] Recommended setup for HA and efficiency On 10/21/15, 12:35 PM, "Morris, Andi" <amor...@cardiffmet.ac.uk<mailto:amor...@cardiffmet.ac.uk>> wrote: Has anyone else run into this sort of issue with devices sitting in the captive portal, and if so ho

Re: [PacketFence-users] edited violations.conf outside of GUI - now errors

2015-10-22 Thread Morris, Andi
cketfence.org<http://www.packetfence.org>) On Oct 22, 2015, at 15:56 , Morris, Andi <amor...@cardiffmet.ac.uk<mailto:amor...@cardiffmet.ac.uk>> wrote: Still no good I'm afraid. All commands ran successfully. The dat files all look like they've been recreated, but there's no dat file for the violat

Re: [PacketFence-users] Recommended setup for HA and efficiency

2015-10-22 Thread Morris, Andi
connects back up to the network without issue and continues as normal. Would creating a real vlan, which has no route to the internet be a better way to go about this? Or am I doing something wrong by sending them to the mac detection vlan? Cheers, Andi From: Morris, Andi [mailto:amor

[PacketFence-users] edited violations.conf outside of GUI - now errors

2015-10-22 Thread Morris, Andi
Hi all, Firstly, sorry for all the mailing list entries recently, it never rains Anyway, I created a violation earlier which went well, however since editing it on the CLI through violations.conf I can no longer get to certain parts of the admin GUI. Httpd.admin.log shows: Oct 22 17:20:30

[PacketFence-users] Recommended setup for HA and efficiency

2015-10-21 Thread Morris, Andi
Hi all, I've recently come into some issues with the load on my PacketFence setup during peak times and so we're now looking at seeing if we can split the service into separate components across servers, and also across our two sites for high availability. Loads are currently around 2000

[PacketFence-users] Internet Explorer web admin access

2015-10-14 Thread Morris, Andi
I'm getting trouble accessing the web admin interface when using IE11. This seems to be ok using PacketFence version 5.1, but not 5.3.1 or 5.4.0. Login access is ok, but the nodes and users tabs just sit there with the 3 dots just flashing as if the browser is waiting. The search box doesn't

Re: [PacketFence-users] tweaking the create users page

2015-10-14 Thread Morris, Andi
wuelfr...@inverse.ca<mailto:dwuelfr...@inverse.ca> :: +1.514.447.4918 (x110) :: +1.866.353.6153 (x110) Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (www.sogo.nu<http://www.sogo.nu>) and PacketFence (www.packetfence.org<http://www.packetfence.org>) On Oct 13, 2015, at 9:22

Re: [PacketFence-users] tweaking the create users page

2015-10-13 Thread Morris, Andi
p://www.sogo.nu>) and PacketFence (www.packetfence.org<http://www.packetfence.org>) On Oct 8, 2015, at 12:04 PM, Morris, Andi <amor...@cardiffmet.ac.uk<mailto:amor...@cardiffmet.ac.uk>> wrote: Aha, I found the Actions array in /lib/pf/Authentication/constants.pm and changed th

Re: [PacketFence-users] tweaking the create users page

2015-10-13 Thread Morris, Andi
Aha, I think I now see that this is not because of the format of the date, but because the ‘expiration’ field isn’t declared as an Action. From: Morris, Andi [mailto:amor...@cardiffmet.ac.uk] Sent: 13 October 2015 14:33 To: packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [PacketFence-users

Re: [PacketFence-users] tweaking the create users page

2015-10-08 Thread Morris, Andi
lto:dwuelfr...@inverse.ca> :: +1.514.447.4918 (x110) :: +1.866.353.6153 (x110) Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (www.sogo.nu<http://www.sogo.nu>) and PacketFence (www.packetfence.org<http://www.packetfence.org>) On Oct 7, 2015, at 11:38 AM, Morris, Andi <amor...@cardiffmet.ac

Re: [PacketFence-users] tweaking the create users page

2015-10-08 Thread Morris, Andi
Aha, I found the Actions array in /lib/pf/Authentication/constants.pm and changed the order. That means that the Actions now shows ‘Set access duration’ by default on the create screen, perfect. I’ll keep looking for ways to give the users a default unreg date. Cheers, Andi From: Morris, Andi

Re: [PacketFence-users] tweaking the create users page

2015-10-07 Thread Morris, Andi
nce (www.packetfence.org<http://www.packetfence.org>) On Oct 1, 2015, at 11:45, Morris, Andi <amor...@cardiffmet.ac.uk<mailto:amor...@cardiffmet.ac.uk>> wrote: Is there a way to remove the registration window option and make two actions appear by default (access duration

[PacketFence-users] tweaking the create users page

2015-10-01 Thread Morris, Andi
Is there a way to remove the registration window option and make two actions appear by default (access duration and role) in the create users window? I'm trying to make this page as simple as possible for the staff creating users. Cheers, Andi - Andi Morris

Re: [PacketFence-users] Using vlan_filter device registration - SOLVED

2015-08-20 Thread Morris, Andi
action = modify_node action_param = mac = $mac , unregdate = 2015-09-0923:59:59 From: Morris, Andi [mailto:amor...@cardiffmet.ac.uk] Sent: 19 August 2015 13:36 To: 'packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net' Subject: Re: [PacketFence-users] Using vlan_filter device registration Apologies, I meant

[PacketFence-users] Using vlan_filter device registration

2015-08-19 Thread Morris, Andi
Hi all, I'm having an issue on a new PF box running 5.0.1 (this is the version we have in dev). Currently I'm using vlan_filters to decide whether a user is a home user, or an eduroam visiting user, and assign the correct role based on this. However I've just added the device-registration

Re: [PacketFence-users] Using vlan_filter device registration

2015-08-19 Thread Morris, Andi
and role (pf::Switch::returnRadiusAccessAccept) Cheers, Andi From: Morris, Andi [mailto:amor...@cardiffmet.ac.uk] Sent: 19 August 2015 13:28 To: packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: [PacketFence-users] Using vlan_filter device registration Hi all, I'm having an issue on a new PF box

[PacketFence-users] FW: valid date

2015-08-18 Thread Morris, Andi
to dynamically calculate this date from the registration date. Cheers, Andi From: Morris, Andi [mailto:amor...@cardiffmet.ac.uk] Sent: 12 May 2015 14:20 To: 'packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net' Subject: Re: [PacketFence-users] valid date Actually, to follow this up. Is there a way to set the unreg

  1   2   3   4   >