Re: [Pdl-general] Fw: [Pdl-devel] Whither PDL?

2019-04-16 Thread Ed .
thing to do to at least create co-maints, just in case of a need to do security updates. I am open to taking that on if there’s no-one better. Best regards, Ed From: Chris Marshall<mailto:devel.chm...@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2019 1:49 PM To: Ed .<mailto:ej...@hotmail.com

Re: [Pdl-general] Fw: [Pdl-devel] Whither PDL?

2019-04-16 Thread Ed .
maybe used. The slightly-different namespace allows for experimentation, while “PDL” gets to stay exactly as-is – a known quantity. Once I bring PDLA up to date (see separate posting), it should be as good as PDL but with quicker installs. Of course you’re welcome to give early feedback now! Best

[Pdl-general] Fw: [Pdl-devel] Whither PDL?

2019-04-14 Thread Ed .
d to also use the patched version, which is a disaster in my opinion) Best regards, Ed -Original Message- From: Luis Mochan Sent: Saturday, April 13, 2019 4:00 PM To: pdl-de...@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Pdl-devel] Whither PDL? On Sat, Apr 13, 2019 at 12:45:54AM -0400, Terry Gaetz wrot

Re: [Pdl-general] [Pdl-devel] RFC: Improving documentation

2019-06-11 Thread Ed .
I think that moving away from POD is incompatible with sticking with metacpan.org. I would instead advocate: * reorganise docs as you've rightly said * stick with POD - I would also advocate using Inline::Pdlpp as I have with PDLA::IO::HDF::* -

Re: [Pdl-general] Several problems with PDL

2019-06-12 Thread Ed .
badtoval(100); say $x;# still [1 BAD 3] say $y;# [1 100 3] Best regards, Ed -Original Message- From: Ingo Schmid Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2019 5:25 PM To: pdl-general@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Pdl-general] Several problems with PDL Hi, let me comment

Re: [Pdl-general] Fw: [Pdl-devel] Whither PDL?

2019-04-21 Thread Ed .
, modules + versions, actions (possibly from URLs), and expected outputs. Best regards, Ed From: Ed .<mailto:ej...@hotmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2019 3:36 PM To: Chris Marshall<mailto:devel.chm...@gmail.com> Cc: pdl-general@lists.sourceforge.net<mailto:pdl-general@lists.

Re: [Pdl-general] Fw: [Pdl-devel] Whither PDL?

2019-04-14 Thread Ed .
of course agree with your point, and not coincidentally with myself, PDLA is the only way forward. It's a misfortune that I haven't updated it since the first effort, but I am going to rectify that. Hence this conversation! Best regards, Ed -Original Message- From: Luis Mochan Sent: Sun

Re: [Pdl-general] CHM passing on PDL maintainer torch

2019-11-10 Thread Ed .
automatically fork a provided "repro set" (as we could call it), and make pull requests with updates. The possibilities are endless. Please share your thoughts, and whether you would like to help out! All the best, Ed -Original Message- From: Luis Mochan Sent: Sunday, No

[Pdl-general] PDL 2.019_01 released to CPAN

2019-11-10 Thread Ed .
o fix any of them (hint: the "approx" one looks easy!), please go ahead! Best regards, Ed PDL releasing guy ___ pdl-general mailing list pdl-general@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pdl-general

[Pdl-general] PDL 2.020 released

2019-12-11 Thread Ed .
Dear PDL folks, I have just released PDL 2.020 onto CPAN. Major changes: - PDL::PP and associated modules now put lots of #line directives into generated .xs files, so it’s possible to understand where in PDL::PP (etc) you’d need to look if something goes wrong - malloc-ed things get zeroed

Re: [Pdl-general] PDL 2.019_01 released to CPAN

2019-12-01 Thread Ed .
in any case. I look forward to having something to look at soon! Similarly - Derek, do you mind my waiting to merge your doc-system stuff until straight after 2.020? Best regards, Ed -Original Message- From: Ingo Schmid Sent: Monday, November 11, 2019 8:58 AM To: pdl-general

Re: [Pdl-general] docker

2020-02-24 Thread Ed
Hi Luis, This is a great initiative! Want to PR the tools used onto the GH repository? Best regards, Ed -Original Message- From: Luis Mochan Sent: Monday, February 24, 2020 3:08 AM To: pdl-general@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: [Pdl-general] docker After a long time, I did a fresh

Re: [Pdl-general] PDL for Apple Silicon

2021-01-05 Thread Ed .
Hi Karl, Could you capture on here what lines of code etc you changed, hopefully along with all the software versions you used etc, so that ideally someone else arriving fresh could do exactly what you did and get the same results? Best regards, Ed From: Karl Glazebrook via pdl-general

Re: [Pdl-general] Status of PDL:NetCDF?

2021-01-05 Thread Ed .
ler error. As another generality, if asking for help, you can save a step by including what version of the various packages you’re using (and ideally a version of Perl and your OS too), and if line numbers of files are given, show those too. At the least, looking at those things might enable yo

Re: [Pdl-general] PDL and FFTW3

2021-06-11 Thread Ed .
Hi Daniel and Ingo, Ingo, thank you for answering! Daniel, did this help? If you have figured how to achieve what you’re after, could you share the relevant code snippet here? Either way, I’d like to incorporate it into the PDL::FFTW3 docs as a nice example. Best regards, Ed From: Ingo

Re: [Pdl-general] removal of ~/.perldl.conf support

2021-06-11 Thread Ed .
Hi Derek, On my Mac I use Homebrew’s GD and it gets found by PDL’s build without needing to specify anything. Could you try installing Homebrew GD? Best regards, Ed From: Bryan Jurish<mailto:moocow.bov...@gmail.com> Sent: 10 June 2021 05:52 To: Derek Lamb<mailto:de...@boulder.swr

Re: [Pdl-general] [Pdl-devel] lu_backsub

2021-06-11 Thread Ed .
t’s on a “[phys]” parameter, because there should never be seg-faults. Best regards, Ed From: Luis Mochan<mailto:moc...@icf.unam.mx> Sent: 08 June 2021 04:54 To: perldl<mailto:pdl-general@lists.sourceforge.net> Subject: Re: [Pdl-general] [Pdl-devel] lu_backsub Hi Ed, On Tue, Jun 01, 2021 at 1

Re: [Pdl-general] removal of ~/.perldl.conf support

2021-06-13 Thread Ed .
Hi Derek, Thanks for the patch, I’ve modified it and merged that, and will release the results soon! Best regards, Ed From: Derek Lamb<mailto:de...@boulder.swri.edu> Sent: 11 June 2021 19:36 To: Ed .<mailto:ej...@hotmail.com> Cc: Bryan Jurish<mailto:moocow.bov...@gmail.com>;

Re: [Pdl-general] Feedback on PDL-Graphics-Gnuplot pause_until_close functionality

2021-05-28 Thread Ed .
This has now been merged and released to CPAN as version 2.017. Best regards, Ed From: Luis Mochan<mailto:moc...@icf.unam.mx> Sent: 24 May 2021 03:41 To: pdl-general@lists.sourceforge.net<mailto:pdl-general@lists.sourceforge.net> Subject: Re: [Pdl-general] Feedback on PDL-Grap

Re: [Pdl-general] [Pdl-devel] lu_backsub

2021-05-31 Thread Ed .
surprising outcome (especially given your previous note was apparently prompted by surprise). What do you (and others) think? Best regards, Ed From: Luis Mochan<mailto:moc...@icf.unam.mx> Sent: 01 June 2021 01:46 To: perldl<mailto:pdl-general@lists.sourceforge.net> Subject: Re: [Pdl-g

[Pdl-general] PDL 2.049 released

2021-05-31 Thread Ed .
$PDL::undefval can be ndarray - overloading now done in PDL::Ops/Primitive where functions defined - overloading honours subclass methods As usual, please give it a try and report problems. Best regards, Ed ___ pdl-general mailing list pdl-general@li

Re: [Pdl-general] [Pdl-devel] PDL 2.049 released

2021-05-31 Thread Ed .
the people who have code that expects the current behaviour. My direction of travel is that PDL::Complex will continue to behave as it does now, but users are recommended to write new code using native-complex. Best regards, Ed From: Luis Mochan<mailto:moc...@icf.unam.mx> Sent: 01 June 2021

Re: [Pdl-general] [Pdl-devel] lu_backsub

2021-05-31 Thread Ed .
other stuff, I’ll be releasing them. Thanks for the report! Best regards, Ed From: Luis Mochan<mailto:moc...@icf.unam.mx> Sent: 29 May 2021 20:28 To: perldl<mailto:pdl-general@lists.sourceforge.net>; perldl<mailto:pdl-de...@lists.sourceforge.net> Subject: [Pdl-devel] l

Re: [Pdl-general] read videos

2021-06-02 Thread Ed .
If you do figure something out, please share it here or on a GitHub issue so it can be incorporated into PDL::IO::Pic! Best regards, Ed From: David Mertens<mailto:dcmertens.p...@gmail.com> Sent: 02 June 2021 01:36 To: Ingo Schmid<mailto:ingo...@gmx.at> Cc: perldl<mai

Re: [Pdl-general] [Pdl-devel] PDL::Drawing::Prima /

2021-07-04 Thread Ed .
, and should fix these problems. Please give it a go! Best regards, Ed From: Ingo Schmid<mailto:ingo...@gmx.at> Sent: 22 June 2021 11:55 To: pdl-general@lists.sourceforge.net<mailto:pdl-general@lists.sourceforge.net>; pdl-devel<mailto:pdl-de...@lists.sourceforge.net> Subje

[Pdl-general] PDL 2.040 released

2021-04-26 Thread Ed .
the docs to “ndarrays” As usual, please try it out, and report any issues! Best regards, Ed ___ pdl-general mailing list pdl-general@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pdl-general

[Pdl-general] PDL 2.043 released

2021-04-30 Thread Ed .
. Best regards, Ed ___ pdl-general mailing list pdl-general@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pdl-general

Re: [Pdl-general] PDL 2.040

2021-04-28 Thread Ed .
The PDL::Version module was removed in 2.035. If a version check is needed, please “require PDL” and use the “$PDL::VERSION” variable instead, which I believe will work on any version going back several years. Best regards, Ed From: vividsnow<mailto:vivids...@gmail.com> Sent: 28 April 2

Re: [Pdl-general] PDL 2.040

2021-04-28 Thread Ed .
installation working! (and to find and fix any PDL problems) Best regards, Ed From: Yury Pakhomov<mailto:pakho...@inasan.ru> Sent: 28 April 2021 14:09 To: pdl-general@lists.sourceforge.net<mailto:pdl-general@lists.sourceforge.net> Subject: Re: [Pdl-general] PDL 2.040 simple command &q

Re: [Pdl-general] PDL 2.040

2021-04-28 Thread Ed .
now!), nothing is lost. Best regards, Ed From: Ingo Schmid<mailto:ingo...@gmx.at> Sent: 28 April 2021 16:01 To: pdl-general@lists.sourceforge.net<mailto:pdl-general@lists.sourceforge.net> Subject: Re: [Pdl-general] PDL 2.040 Hi Ed, thanks for pushing out releases at an unbelievable

[Pdl-general] PDL 2.029 released

2021-03-12 Thread Ed .
that the interactive shells etc are so small and minimal in terms of build that this would not help. Anyone else have views? Please try this version with all your code, and report problems with PRs, GitHub issues, or at least email reports! Best regards, Ed

[Pdl-general] PDL 2.026_04 released - please try it out

2021-03-02 Thread Ed .
the end of the week remains. Please let me (and/or the list) know if you find any problems! Best regards, Ed From: Ed .<mailto:ej...@hotmail.com> Sent: 01 March 2021 00:08 To: perldl<mailto:pdl-general@lists.sourceforge.net>; pdl-devel<mailto:pdl-de...@lists.sourceforge.net> Sub

[Pdl-general] PDL 2.026_03 released - please try it out

2021-02-28 Thread Ed .
h “2” gets turned into – make “D” be last, and all is well) Please give it a try with all your scripts / modules, because if all goes well, I will release it as 2.027 within about a week, give or take. Best regards, Ed From: Ed<mailto:ej...@hotmail.com> Sent: 28 February 2021 12:3

[Pdl-general] PDL 2.027 released

2021-03-06 Thread Ed .
info to reproduce (still great), or at least a report on here (also fine!). Next steps: split out PDL::Core, then other large chunks, into their own distributions, for easier maintenance, and easier use by packagers. Best regards, Ed ___ pdl-general

Re: [Pdl-general] [Pdl-devel] PDL 2.027 released

2021-03-06 Thread Ed .
a check for unsigned-handling. Now that’s corrected, and there’s a test to guard against regressions. As soon as the tests have passed on the CI, there will be a 2.028 on its way to CPAN. Best regards, Ed From: Luis Mochan<mailto:moc...@icf.unam.mx> Sent: 06 March 2021 23:53 To:

Re: [Pdl-general] [Pdl-devel] PDL 2.027 released

2021-03-07 Thread Ed .
), and therefore be able to use the “i” constant in the same way as currently. However, are you seeing a use for it that adds anything to simply using i2C from PDL::Complex? Best regards, Ed From: Luis Mochan<mailto:moc...@icf.unam.mx> Sent: 07 March 2021 22:43 To: pdl-de...@lists.sourcefor

Re: [Pdl-general] [Pdl-devel] PDL 2.027 released

2021-03-08 Thread Ed .
-complex on older (and buggy/incomplete) libm’s on FreeBSD and CentOS, together with some updates I’ve incorporated out of the PDLA distros. If it tests Ok, I’ll be full-releasing 2.029 quite soon, then looking at the PDL::Complex integration. Best regards, Ed From: Luis Mochan<mailto:

Re: [Pdl-general] [Pdl-devel] PDL 2.027 released

2021-03-08 Thread Ed .
ceforge.net<mailto:pdl-general@lists.sourceforge.net> Subject: Re: [Pdl-general] [Pdl-devel] PDL 2.027 released On Mon, Mar 08, 2021 at 03:28:09PM +, Ed . wrote: > Hi folks, > > I added the warning because I found the behaviour surprising when adding > tests. My plan now is

Re: [Pdl-general] [Pdl-devel] PDL 2.027 released

2021-03-08 Thread Ed .
Hi Ingo, That does sound like the right approach. Do you feel like making a PR with at least a sketch like “talk about complex numbers here” in the various places, for me to expand? Obviously, you’ll be welcome to also document it a bit more fully instead ;-) Best regards, Ed From: Ingo

Re: [Pdl-general] [Pdl-devel] PDL 2.027 released

2021-03-07 Thread Ed .
I will have a look at all this in due course. Currently there are some test failures with nat_complex.t on Centos, so I will also look at fixing those, together with incorporating various small but useful changes from the PDLA series back into PDL. Best regards, Ed From: Luis Mochan<mail

Re: [Pdl-general] [Pdl-devel] PDL 2.026_04 released - please try it out

2021-03-05 Thread Ed .
is showing the errors. Best regards, Ed ___ pdl-general mailing list pdl-general@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pdl-general

Re: [Pdl-general] [Pdl-devel] PDL 2.026_04 released - please try it out

2021-03-05 Thread Ed .
“perl -Mblib t/file.t”. I don’t know why you’d get a seg-fault, sorry. Best regards, Ed ___ pdl-general mailing list pdl-general@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pdl-general

Re: [Pdl-general] pgplot instructions for Big Sur macOS

2021-02-28 Thread Ed
to depend on just that (for faster CI / installation) d.. split out other chunks like GSL, etc. With each one, “big PDL” will get a new version that depends on the chunks, so it will still install “everything including the kitchen sink” Best regards, Ed From: Karl Glazebrook Sent: Sunday, February

[Pdl-general] PDL 2.038 released

2021-04-18 Thread Ed .
to work with the brave new PDL. Thank you to the various contributors to these efforts. Everyone please give the new code a try and report any problems in the usual way! Best regards, Ed ___ pdl-general mailing list pdl-general@lists.sourceforge.net

[Pdl-general] PDL 2.037 released

2021-04-16 Thread Ed .
native complex numbers Thoughts welcome on any and all of the above! Best regards, Ed ___ pdl-general mailing list pdl-general@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pdl-general

Re: [Pdl-general] pgplot instructions for Big Sur macOS

2021-02-15 Thread Ed .
turning off their open-source support. GitHub actions are configured in the files under .github. There are tutorials which are very good, but the starting point we have works, which always helps  From: Karl Glazebrook<mailto:karlglazebr...@mac.com> Sent: 16 February 2021 01:22 To: Ed .<

Re: [Pdl-general] pgplot instructions for Big Sur macOS

2021-02-15 Thread Ed .
libraries could be a separate component; the PGPLOT another; maybe GSL another one. That way if PDL::Graphics::PGPLOT needs fixing, that can be done (and released) independently. Best regards, Ed From: Karl Glazebrook<mailto:karlglazebr...@mac.com> Sent: 16 February 2021 07:23 To: Ed .<

Re: [Pdl-general] pgplot instructions for Big Sur macOS

2021-02-15 Thread Ed .
more modern alternatives. I’m reluctant, but there are only so many hours in the day. What do others think? Best regards, Ed From: Karl Glazebrook<mailto:karlglazebr...@mac.com> Sent: 16 February 2021 01:31 To: Ed .<mailto:ej...@hotmail.com> Cc: pdl-general@lists.sourceforge.net<mai

Re: [Pdl-general] pgplot instructions for Big Sur macOS

2021-02-14 Thread Ed .
/PDLPorters/perl5-PGPLOT/tree/macos-ci From: Karl Glazebrook<mailto:karlglazebr...@mac.com> Sent: 14 January 2021 00:26 To: Ed .<mailto:ej...@hotmail.com> Cc: pdl-general@lists.sourceforge.net<mailto:pdl-general@lists.sourceforge.net> Subject: Re: pgplot instructions for Big Sur macOS

Re: [Pdl-general] [Pdl-devel] PDL 2.026_01 released to CPAN

2021-02-20 Thread Ed .
t that while there! Best regards, Ed From: Ingo Schmid<mailto:ingo...@gmx.at> Sent: 20 February 2021 13:21 To: pdl-de...@lists.sourceforge.net<mailto:pdl-de...@lists.sourceforge.net>; pdl-general@lists.sourceforge.net<mailto:pdl-general@lists.sourceforge.net> Subject: Re: [Pdl-devel]

Re: [Pdl-general] [Pdl-devel] PDL 2.026_01 released to CPAN

2021-02-20 Thread Ed .
gle new-style complex value (Ingo’s done a really good job): pdl> $x = cdouble(3 + 2*ci) pdl> p $x 3+2i pdl> p creal($x) 3 pdl> p cimag($x) 2 Best regards, Ed From: Luis Mochan<mailto:moc...@icf.unam.mx> Sent: 20 February 2021 14:48 To: pdl-de...@lists.sourceforge.net<mail

Re: [Pdl-general] [Pdl-devel] PDL 2.026_01 released to CPAN

2021-02-20 Thread Ed .
or test those functions if they’re not there. Best regards, Ed From: Luis Mochan<mailto:moc...@icf.unam.mx> Sent: 20 February 2021 15:41 To: pdl-de...@lists.sourceforge.net<mailto:pdl-de...@lists.sourceforge.net>; pdl-general@lists.sourceforge.net<mailto:pdl-general@lists.

Re: [Pdl-general] [Pdl-devel] PDL 2.026_01 released to CPAN

2021-02-21 Thread Ed .
be that it should always be NaN, but that seems a pity. Discussion of this will inform what to make the tests enforce, since unfortunately they are currently silent. Best regards, Ed From: Ed .<mailto:ej...@hotmail.com> Sent: 21 February 2021 09:54 To: Craig DeForest<mailto:defor...@boulder.swr

Re: [Pdl-general] [Pdl-devel] PDL 2.026 released to CPAN

2021-02-21 Thread Ed .
lto:pdl-general@lists.sourceforge.net> Subject: Re: [Pdl-devel] PDL 2.026 released to CPAN On Sun, Feb 21, 2021 at 12:22:22AM +, Ed . wrote: > It was because PDL::FFTW3 had pp_def params called “complex” which clashed > with complex.h. I’ve changed them and released 0.07 which cleverly renames >

Re: [Pdl-general] [Pdl-devel] PDL 2.026 released to CPAN

2021-02-20 Thread Ed .
! In fact you meant with the dev-released 2.026_01 (phew). In any case, thank you for the report. Best regards, Ed From: Luis Mochan<mailto:moc...@icf.unam.mx> Sent: 20 February 2021 20:53 To: pdl-de...@lists.sourceforge.net<mailto:pdl-de...@lists.sourceforge.net>; perldl<mai

Re: [Pdl-general] [Pdl-devel] PDL 2.026_01 released to CPAN

2021-02-21 Thread Ed .
nt: 21 February 2021 02:08 To: Ed .<mailto:ej...@hotmail.com> Cc: Luis Mochan<mailto:moc...@icf.unam.mx>; pdl-de...@lists.sourceforge.net<mailto:pdl-de...@lists.sourceforge.net>; perldl<mailto:pdl-general@lists.sourceforge.net> Subject: Re: [Pdl-general] [Pdl-devel] PDL 2.0

[Pdl-general] PDL 2.026_01 released to CPAN

2021-02-19 Thread Ed .
, mathematically valid). As Derek said, please report any issues you find to the mailing list (good), or create an issue (better) or a pull request (best!) on GitHub. Thanks, and Happy PDL-ing! Best regards, Ed ___ pdl-general mailing list pdl-general

Re: [Pdl-general] [Pdl-devel] PDL 2.026_01 released to CPAN

2021-02-19 Thread Ed .
ain ) Best regards, Ed From: Luis Mochan<mailto:moc...@icf.unam.mx> Sent: 20 February 2021 00:09 To: pdl-de...@lists.sourceforge.net<mailto:pdl-de...@lists.sourceforge.net>; perldl<mailto:pdl-general@lists.sourceforge.net> Subject: Re: [Pdl-devel] PDL 2.026_01 released to CPAN

[Pdl-general] PDL::Graphics::Simple 1.006 and PDL::Graphics::Gnuplot 2.019 released

2021-08-15 Thread Ed .
these modules, and also to Zaki for indispensable help in fixing the various gremlins that arose. As usual, please give try these and report problems. Best regards, Ed ___ pdl-general mailing list pdl-general@lists.sourceforge.net https

Re: [Pdl-general] SciPDL Docker

2021-08-28 Thread Ed .
container technology? Best regards, Ed From: Karl Glazebrook<mailto:karlglazebr...@mac.com> Sent: 29 August 2021 01:56 To: Ed .<mailto:ej...@hotmail.com> Cc: perldl<mailto:pdl-general@lists.sourceforge.net>; Bob Abraham<mailto:abra...@astro.utoronto.ca> Subject: Re: [Pdl-ge

Re: [Pdl-general] SciPDL Docker

2021-08-16 Thread Ed .
using for other than mmap – oops). Please give it a go! Best regards, Ed From: Karl Glazebrook via pdl-general<mailto:pdl-general@lists.sourceforge.net> Sent: 16 August 2021 13:11 To: perldl<mailto:pdl-general@lists.sourceforge.net> Cc: Bob Abraham<mailto:abra...@astro.utoronto.ca

[Pdl-general] PDL 2.056 released

2021-08-08 Thread Ed .
al, please give it a try and report problems. Best regards, Ed ___ pdl-general mailing list pdl-general@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pdl-general

[Pdl-general] PDL 2.055 released

2021-08-03 Thread Ed .
try and report problems. Non-main-PDL news: new versions of PDL::IO::HDF5 and PDL::Graphics::PLplot have been released recently. Please give them a go as well. Best regards, Ed ___ pdl-general mailing list pdl-general@lists.sourceforge.net ht

Re: [Pdl-general] [Pdl-devel] P::G::Gnuplot 2.017

2021-08-10 Thread Ed .
Hi Luis, It will really help if you can give which version of PDL you have, and also whether you’ve tried exactly the same script on different versions of PDL and/or P:G:Gnuplot to make it easier/possible to track down what’s changed? Best regards, Ed From: Luis Mochan<mailto:

[Pdl-general] PDL 2.057_01 released

2021-09-24 Thread Ed .
intended development is to use OpenCL where available to automatically translate pp_def-ed functions to use GPUs as well. The second and third main points are intended to transform PDL into a C library with a Perl interface, which could then be used in C programs, or via interfaces in other

Re: [Pdl-general] [Pdl-devel] native complex and PDL::LinearAlgebra

2021-09-25 Thread Ed .
[Pdl-devel] native complex and PDL::LinearAlgebra On Sat, Sep 25, 2021 at 03:33:29PM +, Ed . wrote: > Hi Luis, > > I’ll take a look shortly (in the final stages of getting the multi-C to > work). Can you confirm whether this worked according to your expectation in > 2.057? This fai

Re: [Pdl-general] [Pdl-devel] native complex and PDL::LinearAlgebra

2021-09-25 Thread Ed .
Hi Luis, I’ll take a look shortly (in the final stages of getting the multi-C to work). Can you confirm whether this worked according to your expectation in 2.057? Best regards, Ed From: Luis Mochan<mailto:moc...@icf.unam.mx> Sent: 25 September 2021 15:49 To: perldl<mailto:pd

Re: [Pdl-general] PDL 2.057_04 released

2021-10-13 Thread Ed .
I should add: it is a known problem that older versions of clang/LLVM (at least 10.0.1 and 12.0.0, though not 12.0.5) crash when compiling the latest PDL. If this happens for you, please upgrade your clang/LLVM. Best regards, Ed From: Ed .<mailto:ej...@hotmail.com> Sent: 12 October 2021

[Pdl-general] PDL 2.057_04 released

2021-10-12 Thread Ed .
the new PDL a try and report problems. Best regards, Ed ___ pdl-general mailing list pdl-general@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pdl-general

Re: [Pdl-general] [Pdl-devel] benchmarks

2021-09-30 Thread Ed .
of different ray heights. That could then benefit from pthreading. Comments very welcome on the design of the PP function and its use of threading! Best regards, Ed From: Ed .<mailto:ej...@hotmail.com> Sent: 30 September 2021 16:38 To: Luis Mochan<mailto:moc...@icf.unam.mx>; perld

Re: [Pdl-general] [Pdl-devel] benchmarks

2021-09-30 Thread Ed .
ing, but I’d assume that NumPy/scipy would have the same performance difficulties in this benchmark as PDL, and for similar reasons. Best regards, Ed From: Luis Mochan<mailto:moc...@icf.unam.mx> Sent: 28 September 2021 00:47 To: perldl<mailto:pdl-general@lists.sourceforge.net>; perld

Re: [Pdl-general] [Pdl-devel] benchmarks

2021-10-02 Thread Ed .
I have now updated the PDL version, which now shows speed comparable to C, and indeed with the pthreading it’s even faster (which isn’t fun to do in pure C, but incredibly trivial in PDL): https://github.com/Fourmilab/floating_point_benchmarks/pull/1 From: Ed .<mailto:ej...@hotmail.com>

Re: [Pdl-general] [Pdl-devel] benchmarks

2021-10-03 Thread Ed .
1.5e6 | 56 | 26.785714 | 42.1 | | my pdl | 15e6 | 67 | 223.88060 |5.0 | | Ed's pdl | 15e6 | 16 | 937.5 |1.2 | | Ed's 4 cores | 15e6 | 11 | 1363.6364 | 0.8 | So, as Ed wrote, just by stting and environment variabl

Re: [Pdl-general] [Pdl-devel] native complex and PDL::LinearAlgebra

2021-09-27 Thread Ed .
Further to this, an obvious approach for e.g. “conj” is to add “PMCode” that simply does “return $self if $self->type->real;” first, with the obvious “topdl” bit first to setup $self. From: Ed .<mailto:ej...@hotmail.com> Sent: 27 September 2021 15:23 To: Luis Mochan<mailto:moc

Re: [Pdl-general] [Pdl-devel] native complex and PDL::LinearAlgebra

2021-09-27 Thread Ed .
too. PR-ing of tests on main PDL would also be very helpful! Best regards, Ed From: Luis Mochan<mailto:moc...@icf.unam.mx> Sent: 27 September 2021 01:41 To: perldl<mailto:pdl-general@lists.sourceforge.net>; perldl<mailto:pdl-de...@lists.sourceforge.net> Subject: Re: [Pdl-dev

Re: [Pdl-general] [Pdl-devel] benchmarks

2021-10-01 Thread Ed .
it. Best regards, Ed From: Boyd Duffee<mailto:boyd.duf...@gmail.com> Sent: 01 October 2021 07:27 To: Ed .<mailto:ej...@hotmail.com> Cc: perldl<mailto:pdl-general@lists.sourceforge.net>; perldl<mailto:pdl-de...@lists.sourceforge.net> Subject: Re: [Pdl-devel] benchmarks I was t

[Pdl-general] PDL 2.063_01 released

2021-12-21 Thread Ed .
if available The IRC channel (#pdl on irc.perl.org) is a great virtual place to come and ask questions, or just watch the GitHub messages flow by. As usual, please give the new PDL a try and report problems. Best regards, Ed ___ pdl-general mailing list

Re: [Pdl-general] How to change a child piddle's data in C?

2021-12-23 Thread Ed .
lpp. For a working (albeit somewhat complex) example, see posts here about John Walker’s floating-point benchmarks done in PDL. Best regards, Ed From: Bryan Jurish<mailto:moocow.bov...@gmail.com> Sent: 19 June 2020 14:26 To: Derek Lamb<mailto:de...@boulder.swri.edu> Cc: perldl<

[Pdl-general] PDL 2.062 released

2021-11-18 Thread Ed .
ew PDL a try and report problems. Best regards, Ed ___ pdl-general mailing list pdl-general@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pdl-general

Re: [Pdl-general] PDL 2.059 released

2021-11-11 Thread Ed .
directives. Best regards, Ed From: Ingo Schmid<mailto:ingo...@gmx.at> Sent: 11 November 2021 15:19 To: pdl-general@lists.sourceforge.net<mailto:pdl-general@lists.sourceforge.net> Subject: Re: [Pdl-general] PDL 2.059 released Hi Ed, I've noticed very strange clutter of # line ... in PP

Re: [Pdl-general] [Pdl-devel] benchmarks

2021-10-26 Thread Ed .
com> Sent: 26 October 2021 08:57 To: Ed .<mailto:ej...@hotmail.com> Cc: Luis Mochan<mailto:moc...@icf.unam.mx>; pdl-de...@lists.sourceforge.net<mailto:pdl-de...@lists.sourceforge.net>; perldl<mailto:pdl-general@lists.sourceforge.net> Subject: Re: [Pdl-devel] benchmarks

[Pdl-general] PDL 2.058 released

2021-11-06 Thread Ed .
hal. Thanks, Zaki! The IRC channel (#pdl on irc.perl.org) is a great virtual place to come and ask questions, or just watch the GitHub messages flow by. As usual, please give the new PDL a try and report problems. Best regards, Ed ___ pdl-general mail

Re: [Pdl-general] PDL 2.059 released

2021-11-08 Thread Ed .
2.059 had problems on more recent versions of the MinGW runtime. I have now worked around these, and released a new 2.060 which seems to work again. Please report any problems in 2.060! Best regards, Ed From: Ed .<mailto:ej...@hotmail.com> Sent: 08 November 2021 05:04 To:

[Pdl-general] PDL 2.059 released

2021-11-07 Thread Ed .
e.g. BLAS/LAPACK routines if available * use OpenCL to also utilise GPUs if available The IRC channel (#pdl on irc.perl.org) is a great virtual place to come and ask questions, or just watch the GitHub messages flow by. As usual, please give the new PDL a try and report problems. Best regards,

[Pdl-general] PDL 2.064 released

2022-01-08 Thread Ed .
ble from e.g. Python * use OpenCL or other means to also utilise GPUs if available The IRC channel (#pdl on irc.perl.org) is a great virtual place to come and ask questions, or just watch the GitHub messages flow by. As usual, please give the new PDL a try and report problems. Best regards,

Re: [Pdl-general] set pointer to data (PP)

2022-03-15 Thread Ed .
ype, and get_dataref/upd_data to create an ndarray. Best regards, Ed From: Ingo Schmid<mailto:ingo...@gmx.at> Sent: 15 March 2022 19:52 To: perldl<mailto:pdl-general@lists.sourceforge.net> Subject: [Pdl-general] set pointer to data (PP) Hi, I would like to update the pointer to piddle data. I've g

[Pdl-general] PDL 2.077 released

2022-03-16 Thread Ed .
org) is a great virtual place to come and ask questions, or just watch the GitHub messages flow by. As usual, please give the new PDL a try and report problems. Best regards, Ed ___ pdl-general mailing list pdl-general@lists.sourceforge.net ht

Re: [Pdl-general] otherpars and return value

2022-03-08 Thread Ed .
better a pull-request with the suggested doc snippet! Best regards, Ed From: Craig DeForest<mailto:defor...@boulder.swri.edu> Sent: 08 March 2022 17:29 To: Ingo Schmid<mailto:ingo...@gmx.at> Cc: perldl<mailto:pdl-general@lists.sourceforge.net> Subject: Re: [Pdl-general] otherpar

Re: [Pdl-general] otherpars and return value

2022-03-08 Thread Ed .
passed around as a blessed Perl IV, XS takes care of this all for you), and the use of OtherPars => “gsl_interp_accel *acc” then $COMP(acc) in the rest of the code. Best regards, Ed From: Ingo Schmid<mailto:ingo...@gmx.at> Sent: 08 March 2022 17:10 To: perldl<mailto

[Pdl-general] PDL 2.075 released

2022-02-19 Thread Ed .
place to come and ask questions, or just watch the GitHub messages flow by. As usual, please give the new PDL a try and report problems. Best regards, Ed ___ pdl-general mailing list pdl-general@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists

Re: [Pdl-general] [Pdl-devel] PDL::Graphics::TriD

2022-02-17 Thread Ed .
Hi Guillermo, If it’s working now there’s no need to worry. The -MV= stuff would have been to detect if the two PDL* modules were from different sources, but it looks like you’ve cracked it already! Best regards, Ed From: Guillermo P. Ortiz<mailto:gor...@exa.unne.edu.ar> Sent: 17 Fe

Re: [Pdl-general] [Pdl-devel] PDL::Graphics::TriD

2022-02-17 Thread Ed .
current PDL installation isn’t finding OpenGL (in fact, you probably don’t have OpenGL::GLUT installed, which is now needed to build and use OpenGL type stuff). Best regards, Ed From: Guillermo P. Ortiz<mailto:gor...@exa.unne.edu.ar> Sent: 17 February 2022 22:48 To: pdl-de...@lists.sourcefor

Re: [Pdl-general] [Pdl-devel] PP and c++

2022-03-04 Thread Ed .
/master/Libtmp/GSL/INTERP for a complete example. However you decide to proceed, I would urge you to indeed share your code, possibly on GitHub. It might even make sense for you to fork Dima’s repo and start from there? Please put the URL and any code so far on issue #362 :-) Best regards, Ed

[Pdl-general] PDL 2.063_04 released

2022-01-07 Thread Ed .
channel (#pdl on irc.perl.org) is a great virtual place to come and ask questions, or just watch the GitHub messages flow by. As usual, please give the new PDL a try and report problems. Best regards, Ed ___ pdl-general mailing list pdl-general

Re: [Pdl-general] PDL 2.078

2022-04-12 Thread Ed .
as a mechanism is not a suitable vehicle for this, nor really for anything else. The whole Alien concept in Perl was originally invented to solve this class of problems, for PDL. We are sticking with it until a convincing case is made for something better. Best regards, Ed From: Hernán De Angelis

Re: [Pdl-general] PDL 2.078

2022-04-12 Thread Ed .
a nice visual demo for PDL::Stats). Anyone who knows more about statistics than me who wants to help or even offer guidance on that or the OpenCV stuff, please speak up! Best regards, Ed From: Luis Mochan<mailto:moc...@icf.unam.mx> Sent: 12 April 2022 17:14 To: pdl-general@lists.sourcefor

[Pdl-general] PDL::LinearAlgebra 0.27 released

2022-04-06 Thread Ed .
virtual place to come and ask questions, or just watch the GitHub messages flow by. As usual, please give the new release a try and report problems. Best regards, Ed ___ pdl-general mailing list pdl-general@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net

Re: [Pdl-general] PDL 2.078

2022-04-11 Thread Ed .
open an issue on https://github.com/Perl-GPU/OpenGL-GLUT/issues describing the problem you’re having with GLUT to help us fix it. My plan is to roll OpenGL::GLUT back into a single OpenGL distribution to ease installation/use. Best regards, Ed From: Hernán De Angelis<mailto:variablesta

[Pdl-general] pdl.perl.org website updated

2022-04-15 Thread Ed .
in the sidebar (which links to that). As usual, please give the new website a try and report problems. Best regards, Ed ___ pdl-general mailing list pdl-general@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pdl-general

Re: [Pdl-general] PDL 2.078

2022-04-12 Thread Ed .
, or by opening a GitHub issue, or whatever other means you feel suitable :-) Best regards, Ed From: Hernán De Angelis<mailto:variablestarli...@gmail.com> Sent: 12 April 2022 18:50 To: Ed .<mailto:ej...@hotmail.com> Cc: pdl-general@lists.sourceforge.net<mailto:pdl-general@lists.sourcefor

  1   2   >