Denny,
MZ 5n or MZ3.
I want to use my K lenses with these bodies. I know that I cannot use the
autofocus
which I consider not an issue.
I use an MZ-3. Although autofocus will not work with manual focus lenses,
the 'in focus' diamond appears in the viewfinder when the lens is in focus.
I
On 11-01-2002 at 1:32 Frantisek Vlcek wrote:
Arture, nevim zda je to o tolik lepsi v Cechach. Muj znamy si
kupoval
MZ-S a take si ho dovezl z nemecka, vyslo ho (i s Battery
Gripem) na
nejakych 36 000,- Kc (1000$?).
From the http://www.oanda.com/ :
1 Czech Koruna = 0.10896 Polish Zloty
So
On 11-01-2002 at 5:08 Denny B wrote:
Is the MZ's 6 segment evaluative metering used on manual or
auto, will I be
able
to use this part of the MZ metering with K lenses?
No. With the lenses older than A the matrix metering turns to
c/w. However, the spot metering is available...
Since you
Pentax reportedly recorded the cound of an LX shutter opening and closing
for use in the EI-2000 digital SLR to emulate actual shutter.
_
Join the worlds largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail.
http://www.hotmail.com
-
This
Brubeck may have been too European / milky / white / etc but he was
definitely an innovator. His 'Jazz Impressions of Eurasia' album preceeded
the 'world music' movement by about 30 years.
_
Chat with friends online, try MSN
Dear MZ3_fella
Do you have a name? Is there a reason why you want to remain anonymous
on this list?
It would be nice to know who we're talking to.
MZ3_fella _ wrote:
Brubeck may have been too European / milky / white / etc
but he was definitely an innovator. His 'Jazz Impressions
of
Thanks a lot to all that answered.
After some statistics calculations being done I decided that spotmetering should
defenitely work on M-lenses;)
Thanks again,
--
Best regards,
Alexey Tikhonov mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail
Hello fellow PDML'ers
Not sure if it could be of any interest, but couldn't resist;)
I'ev recently updated my website with new galleries part.
To make it less OT - all photos there were shot with MX'ses and
different lenses, mostly pentax M.
P.S. I wonder how many of you use soft focus lenses
Hello
forgetting the link was a good thing to do, hehe;)
http://www.altert.spb.ru/gallery/exhibitions.html
--
Best regards,
Alexey mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow
J. C. O'Connell wrote:
I have
the wooden grip which is essential for hand held but
even then my left wrist started to feel pain when I
took too long to focus with my right.
I've used my 6x7 with and without the wooden grip. I like the wooden
grip for verticals, but I prefer it without the
Bruce Dayton wrote:
I'm trying to figure out why everyone thinks the LX meter is so
fantastic. Other than low light sensitivity, isn't it just a normal
center weighted meter?
No. In aperture priority mode, it reads off of the film plane. Judging by results,
that seems to work very well.
Thursday, January 10, 2002, 9:13:37 PM, Fred wrote:
I was just wondering the same thing Fred, is there a different abbreviation, I
always get confused (easy for me)...
I think the best way (and it was used here too some way back) is this:
mf = manual focus
MF = MEDIUM FORMAT (it's bigger than
Thursday, January 10, 2002, 9:05:11 PM, Mike wrote:
MJ Note: The new 4-megapixel HP digicam has a PENTAX zoom lens.
MJ http://www.dpreview.com/news/0201/02010903hpphotosmart812.asp
A bad move, IMHO. HP's digicams were the the worst suckers of the lot
I have seen. Especially the non-Pentax ones
AR I've noticed this with 4000ppi scans from Delta 3200. The real pain has
AR been unsharp masking, where really you can end up just accentuating the
AR edges of the grain rather than edges and lines in the image.
Hmm, it's like in point source enlargers. These scanners use a point
source,
Hi Aleksander!
To your question on focus confirmation - I think manual focus with
manual focus body (ie with high magnification finder, 0.9 and up, and
split-image focusing aid) is much much more precise than ANY autofocus
system on the market. If you have failing eyes though (I wear glasses,
so
JCO wrote:
In camera meters are very stupid to the point that a simple guess
can easily be more accurate than even an LX with certain subjects.
Certainly not. The LX meter and any other correctly calibrated meter is
right 100% of the time.
Very true to the point that in order to
If I use the extention tubes, what are the other effects. Do I loose the
ablility to focus to infinity, does it increase magnification of the lens?
Thanks,
Geoff
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't
Shel wrote:
SB nor did I say that I shun meters. Rather, for much of the photography
SB that I do, I tend to meter the general scene, and then put the meter
SB away. If the light remains the same, there's no need to continually
I often do the same, especially in concert photography (unless
From the http://www.oanda.com/ :
AL 1 Czech Koruna = 0.10896 Polish Zloty
AL So paying 36 000 Kc would be more than good enough for me, for
AL it would mean something about 3600 PLN. The MZ-S + BG-10 costs
AL about 5000 PLN which means about 5 Kc...
I don't know if it was exactly 36 000
Excellent site, Alexey.
Thanks,
Ed
http://lightandsilver.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Alexey Tikhonov
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 5:34 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: OT: website - actual link
Hello
Frantisek wrote:
To your question on focus confirmation - I think manual focus with
manual focus body (ie with high magnification finder, 0.9 and up, and
split-image focusing aid) is much much more precise than ANY autofocus
system on the market.
I beg to differ. I find the good, modern
If I use the extention tubes, what are the other effects. Do I
loose the
ablility to focus to infinity, does it increase magnification
of the lens?
Thanks,
Geoff
Yes, when you use an extension tube you lose the ability to
focus to infinity; and yes it does increase the magnification of
You want 300mm-class, close focus, and cheap, all at once? Try a Vivitar
Series 1 200/3.0 (in M42) with an M42 adapter screwed into a 1.4X-S
teleconverter. Close focus: 1.3 m. And at least a half-step better
transmissivity than my Pentax SMC 200/2.5K.
Last evening, Geoff showed my his
Hi Alexey,
There are some very nice shots in your gallery. Quite striking as a
website, too.
Dan Scott
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello fellow PDML'ers
Not sure if it could be of any interest, but couldn't resist;)
I'ev recently updated my website with new galleries part.
To make it less OT - all
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Priority: NORMAL
X-Mailer: Execmail for Win32 Version 5.0.1 Build (55)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Don't worry, I don't believe you will have offended anybody (unless
they're very sensitive)!
My hypothesis as to why (spot) metering
There is also an adapter to use the Pentacon Six mount lenses on the Pentax
645.
Kent Gittings
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Evan Hanson
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 3:33 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Anyone shoot MF
On 10 Jan 2002 at 15:21, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Hi Rob,
Not that I've noticed. If there is a difference it's a lot less than
the difference on the LX. On the LX the sound goes from one with a
metallic ping, similar to the old LX, to a nice, subtle, thunk. I'd
like to record a WAV of
Hi all,
There was a bit of list traffic a couple weeks ago on the merits of some of
the smaller-aperture 85mm lenses. I find my 135mm a bit long for some
portrait and candid situations, especially indoors. A nice 100mm or 85mm
might work better. Much as I'd love one of those A* 85/1.4's, that
http://www.mir.com.my/rb/photography/hardwares/classics/pentaxlx/
Click on metering.
Regards,
Bob...
Let us contemplate our forefathers, and posterity,
and resolve to maintain the rights bequeathed to us
from the former, for the sake of the latter.
The necessity of the
On Fri, 11 Jan 2002 08:23:10 -0500, Evan Hanson wrote:
Can anyone recommend a good online primer on scaning and post
scanning modifications. JCO is right the scan is way too soft.
http://www.scantips.com
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to
Brendan wrote:
I have to say I never actually seen the 1600 model. Do you know what year
they went to 3200?
I don't think 1600 models even officially exist. From day one the LX was
specified as going to 3200 ISO. The first batch of LX reaching Europe had
3200 ISO.
If they did a change, it
JCO,
Nice report of the P67. Thanks.
I bet BW
8X10s from 6X7 are very nice indeed.
You know it. 11x14s are great too.
--Mike J.
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users'
Bruce Dayton wrote:
... So I am still working on the EPO (Entertainment Prevention
Officer) to make it happen.
Gales of uproarious laughter, mate!
Well said :-)
Stephen Moore
__
You got a Zarg in here? Are you *nuts*???
-
This message is from the
I just looked and they seem to have some nice equipment to offer:
Latest Arrivals:
20/2.8 A, VERY RARE 97.5%...$ 549
85/2 M, SCARCE (9 TO 9+)$ 275
300/4 M GREEN STAR (9)$ 299
300/4 M GREEN STAR, 99% !!! $ 399
AUTO BELLOWS A SET WITH
DOUBLE CABLE RELEASE AND
Delano,
What would you use the 35mm system for if you had a MF system to
do portraits with?
If the answer really is nothing, get rid of the 35mm.
I constantly try to tell myself the same thing...:-)
I have both a 645 system and a 35mm system. I keep telling myself
that I should concentrate
I was using the focus confirm beep w/ a PZ1-p and my ancient
85mm f1.9 SuperTak in a dark theater setting (dress rehersal)
and found it a wonderful feature. To get it I slipped a thin
piece of aluminum foil between the lens and the PZ1-p's contacts
to fool
frank theriault wrote:
Miles Davis seemed to have had an incredible knack for scouting up and coming
talent,
who gained their initial popularity in his group - Bill Evans and John Coltrane on
Kind
of Blue, and later, Herbie Hancock, Wayne Shorter, etc - and then went on to
tremendous
Hi Bill,
If your intentions are portraiture, don't pass up an m42
85mm if you find one at a good price. You'll need the adapter
and lose auto-aperture; but at portrait apertures you can still
see through it very well indeed ;^)
Bill
MZ series have much worse viewfinders than your old bodies. The only
thing that changed for better over the years is focusing screen
brightness. Otherwise, the magnification is much lower, making manual
focus a pain compared to good old mf body. I think it's quite good to
install a newer focusing
I have the gear set up, Neumann U87 mic and Tascam DA-P1 DAT in a nice quiet
room, will process it all in the digital domain, you'd be surprised just how
much can be learned from a high quality recording. Analogous to good film,
good
lens, good camera, good light, good exposure, good
Pat said the 80A was used only on the Lipstick image,
the other was unfiltered.
I think I'll be stopping by home depot soon, $70 for
1000w and 5 spare bulbs , the bulbs are 3400k to.
--- David Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What filter(s) were used in this process.??
Dave
Begin
I have to credit one of my British friends for that one.
Bruce Dayton
Friday, January 11, 2002, 6:55:07 AM, you wrote:
SM Bruce Dayton wrote:
... So I am still working on the EPO (Entertainment Prevention
Officer) to make it happen.
SM Gales of uproarious laughter, mate!
SM Well said
Bob,
Ok, I read through it. I still say, compared to modern cameras, that
outside of low light readings, there doesn't appear to be anything
overly special about using the meter in the LX. I understand it reads
from the film plane, but outside of long exposures, I don't think that
is much, if
P - a - t - i - e - n - t. I can spell it but I sure as heck don't know
what it means!
Er, when's the PMA??
Cotty
Feb 24-27, 2002 in Orlando, Florida.
Thanks Mike.
___
Personal email traffic to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MacAds traffic to [EMAIL
Anyone on the list ever compare the image quality of Pentax's SMCP-A 15mm
f/3.5 to the Voigtlander Heliar 15mm f/4.5?
Spec wise the Heliar seems to have the advantage: 1/3 the price, 1/5 the
weight, smaller size, 10 vs 5 aperture blades... How does it do wide open?
Contrast, color, flare, etc.?
- Original Message -
From: Bill D. Casselberry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: MZ7, MZ5, MZ3 bodies
I was using the focus confirm beep w/ a PZ1-p and my ancient
85mm f1.9 SuperTak in a dark theater setting (dress rehersal)
and found it a wonderful feature. To get it I slipped
- Original Message -
From: Frantisek Vlcek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Pentax MZ7, MZ5, MZ3 bodies
get one of the older AF bodies like PZ1p (true spot area compared to
MZ5n/MZ3 quite bigger spot area, IIRC)
What exactly is that area in Z-1p and MZ-5n/3?
Artur
-
This
Hello. I realize that there is a wealth of information regarding Pentax 28mm lenses
available. I have done some research. I will need to purchase a wide angle lens soon
to photograph buildings and interiors, so I am looking for advise from Pentax users as
to which 28mm has the least
Yes to both questions.
Geoff Moes wrote:
If I use the extention tubes, what are the other effects. Do I loose the
ablility to focus to infinity, does it increase magnification of the lens?
--
Shel Belinkoff
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://home.earthlink.net/~belinkoff/
-
This message is
Because the LX meters off the film plane and not through the focus screen, it is not
sensitive to the brightness (translucence) of the focus screen as is the MX or any
other
camera that has to meter through the screen. This allows the use of many different
types
of screens without having to
- Original Message -
From: Brendan
Subject: Re: Re: Halogen lighting
Pat said the 80A was used only on the Lipstick image,
the other was unfiltered.
I think I'll be stopping by home depot soon, $70 for
1000w and 5 spare bulbs , the bulbs are 3400k to.
I have been using yard lights
Bill,
I've seen the M85/2.0 go as high as $400.00+. Good ones these days are
in the $225.00 - $300.00 range. Deals can often be found. Take a look
at the message Antti-Pekka just posted with a list of Pentax items from
Woodmere Camera. (http://www.woodcam.com) They have a nice one for
I think the best way (and it was used here too some way back) is this:
mf = manual focus
MF = MEDIUM FORMAT (it's bigger than sf, small format, eh g ?)
Personally, I prefer MedF and MF, since I tend to write AF instead of
af. But I'm sure most of us can decode it regardless of the style.
I got ta get that addition built.
Dave
Begin Original Message
From: Brendan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Fri, 11 Jan 2002 11:18:43 -0500 (EST)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Re: Halogen lighting
Pat said the 80A was used only on the Lipstick image,
the other was unfiltered.
I think
Well, I finally did it. I decided over the holidays it would be fun to shoot
BW. Mostly family-during-the-holiday-get-together-shots but some more
artsy things as well and Sue the t-rex.
I've got a back-log of negatives and slides to scan so I started messing
around with the BW negatives. My
The only other genuine pentax screen for the MZ-S is one with a grid on
it. There are no offivial split screens. However, some have put the
MZ-M screen into MZ-5 and I think it worked OK. Not sure if this is
right size for MZ-S though...
-Original Message-
From: A K [mailto:[EMAIL
Artur Ledóchowski wrote:
Wow:)! Can you give some details on it? It's very important to me since I'm
going to get a Z-1p soon and read that it doesn't support the focus
confirmation feature for m42 lenses and I'd like to mount my MIR 20mm on the
camera...
Just slip a piece of
Aaron was kind enough to provide some 5 in one
reflectors :) my basement is white with green carpet
but the roof is a nice neutral white foam/stucko
--- William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Brendan
Subject: Re: Re: Halogen lighting
Pat said the 80A
In a message dated 11/01/02 17:10:31 GMT Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi all,
There was a bit of list traffic a couple weeks ago on the merits of some of
the smaller-aperture 85mm lenses. I find my 135mm a bit long for some
portrait and candid situations, especially indoors.
Pal, you are quite mistaken. Leaving the camera on automatic can cause
exposure problems. Here's one example taken from a commentary by Kirk
Tuck, in which he describes metering a scene in which the light doesn't
change:
When I meter my hand it meters the light falling on it and
In a message dated 11/01/02 17:10:31 GMT Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
17/4 SMC FISH-EYE, SCARCE (9)$ 349
35-105/3.5 A, SCARCE 97.5% $ 215
40/2.8 M PANCAKE (9+)$ 225
Hey, it's nice to know there's someone else that does not consider the
On Fri, 11 Jan 2002, Rob Brigham wrote:
The only other genuine pentax screen for the MZ-S is one with a grid on
it. There are no offivial split screens. However, some have put the
MZ-M screen into MZ-5 and I think it worked OK. Not sure if this is
right size for MZ-S though...
ooh..
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Here is a hint if you will be using them for portraits:
Get yourself some foam core, or something similar, and build
reflectors to fire the lights off of.
Bill,by foam core,do you mean like the blue type
used in insulation jobs or something else.
Dave
Bob,
What you say makes sense. It make the LX more versatile than many
other cameras. It still doesn't make the usage of the center weighted
only meter any better than other bodies. There are many on the list
who seem to continually refer to the metering capability as something
godlike. I
'Asahi Pentax Spotmatic II' is Japanese/Greek/English/Greek/Latin.
Send FREE video emails in Yahoo! Mail!
http://promo.yahoo.com/videomail/
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax
Begin Original Message
From: Christian Skofteland [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Fri, 11 Jan 2002 12:08:32 -0500
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: BW negative scanning
Is there anything
wrong with scanning the BW as color and converting the scan to grey-
scale?
The results
Shel,
Very well put. The meter is just a tool. When understood and used
properly, it can help you produce good results. When misunderstood or
used poorly, it will be fooled quite often.
Bruce
Friday, January 11, 2002, 9:29:10 AM, you wrote:
SB Pal, you are quite mistaken. Leaving the
Francis,
If you can find an older K 28mm f3.5 (52mm front filter size), that has the best
reputation and could cost $35-$65 because it looks old and obsolete (manual focus).
The optics are great. I would not buy the M28/2.8 or settle for a M28/3.5 (49mm
filter manual focus).
If you
I've noticed that somehow I messed up my Jan PUG photo
(scanning?). The print is much better than what you
can see on the screen. Sorry.
Luis
Send FREE video emails in Yahoo! Mail!
http://promo.yahoo.com/videomail/
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to
Isn't it
mostly about understanding the equipment and how it works to be able
to use it wisely?
I think that's always the case.
I think it also helps if the device is accurate and consistent, which some
in-camera meters really aren't. I used to have an SPF, for instance, that
would
- Original Message -
From: Bruce Dayton Subject: Re[6]: getting LX - worth it?
On a side note - I found it odd that each year, Pop
Photograhpy does a
camera roundup where they list the main models of each maker.
The LX
has not been shown for a very long time, even though it could
Shel, I've only held this lens once but if memory serves, it had a focusing
clutch that made it one of the best feeling AF lenses I've ever held.
Evan
From: Shel Belinkoff
The 24/2.0 is getting rave reviews here, which, of course, is always of
interest. But the question is, how much better is
Shel,
I can tell you a little. This is a * lens so it's build quality is
higher than the typical FA lens - it is mostly metal-can't say if any
plastic is used. It also has the focus clutch, which IMO, provides for
a much better manual focus feel than the typical FA lens. The extra
stop is
Help needed:
I just loaded a roll of 220 in the 67. I did make sure the
pressure plate was set to 220, and then advanced it so that
the counter shows '0'.
But only then did I remember to turn the right switch to 220.
Will I be able to shoot more than 10 frames? In other words,
does the
On Friday, January 11, 2002, at 01:31 AM, Bruce Dayton wrote:
I'm trying to figure out why everyone thinks the LX meter is so
fantastic. Other than low light sensitivity, isn't it just a normal
center weighted meter?
I like it for its low light sensitivity and because it will alter
Happy Friday!
I'm looking into getting an inexpensive scanner (right now, the leader is the Epson
1250 with photo attachment). I'm debating on going this route versus getting a
PhotoCD with my processing (both slides and color negs). I haven't had any shots made
into a PhotoCD, so I'm brand
These are some Pentax cameras I have for sale, because nowadays they see
very little use, and I want to sell them to fund other Pentax equipment
purchases.
This is the first lot:
Pentax SFX AF SLR body (like new) + Pentax soft case for the SFX + SMC
Pentax-F 35-70 mm. 3.5-4.5 (one of the best
- Original Message -
From: Michel Adam
Subject: 67 film advance question
Help needed:
I just loaded a roll of 220 in the 67. I did make sure the
pressure plate was set to 220, and then advanced it so that
the counter shows '0'.
But only then did I remember to turn the right
Drop me an email when you get a chance. Had to reformat my hard drive and
lost all the addresses.
Bill
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at
I'm looking into getting an inexpensive scanner (right now, the leader is
the Epson 1250 with photo attachment). I'm debating on going this route
versus getting a PhotoCD with my processing (both slides and color negs). I
haven't had any shots made into a PhotoCD, so I'm brand new at this
Aaron,
Guess I phrased that badly. Other than low light *usage* (sensitivity
and reaction-shutter), isn't it just a normal center weighted meter?
Bruce Dayton
Friday, January 11, 2002, 12:37:23 PM, you wrote:
AR On Friday, January 11, 2002, at 01:31 AM, Bruce Dayton wrote:
I'm trying
Forget about the Epson 1250 flatbed for film or slide scanning - get it if you want to
scan prints, etc. but skip the photo attachment, and go with the PhotoCD for now. For
websites the flatbed may be fine, but for prints - especially 8x10 - it won't do the
job. Save up for a filmscanner
Thanks Bill.I know what you mean now.We have similar
stuff here in our photogramatry dept.a white kind
of shiny sheet with a thin waffer inbetween.
Dave
Begin Original Message
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Fri, 11 Jan 2002 14:38:58 -0600
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
A friend works at at Daymen in Markham.We disscussed
the 1250 and 1650.I'm going to do the same as you
but for the extra $100.00 or so i'll go with the 1650.Now
they have to get their back orders in
Dave
Begin Original Message
From: Bill Owens [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Fri, 11
A listing on German Ebay claims to have a Peleng 8/3.5 circular fisheye lens in K
mount:
http://cgi.ebay.de/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=1320219348
Is this possible? That would be quite a development. No mention whether it's
autoaperture.
I've written to an English-speaking Russian who
Yup it is, you'll loose the spot meter for some reason
( it works just meters weird thru the split image
finder ), just order from Pentax a MZ-M screen and
swap them :)
--- gfen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 11 Jan 2002, Rob Brigham wrote:
The only other genuine pentax screen for the
Artur wrote: Aanybody knows links to other Internet shops in Czech and maybe Slovakia?
http://www.foto-video.cz
The Pentax used stuff is at http://www.foto-video.cz/cenik.asp?kod=PE07*
and other shops listed by country at
http://acecam.com/abroad.html#Europe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm one who holds the 67 just like my 35s -- left hand under the
mirrorbox, with left fingers and thumb focusing and changing the
aperture, and right hand (obviously) winding and firing. I do not find
that this fatigues my wrists at all. If anything, my shoulders and neck
are tight at the
Hi
I just caught this message just as I was joining up. Just some info on the CANADA:
Year of the Land
This book was produced to commerate Canada's Centennial.
The executive producer was Lorraine Monk, a lady who did more for Canadian
photographers to establish them as artists,
was the
Hi
Has anyone had experience with this lens?
herb
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
It is, however, sensitive to the reflectivity of the film itself
which seems to vary somewhat from film to film.
Len
---
- Original Message -
From: Bob Blakely [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 10:54 AM
Subject: Re: Re[4]: getting LX - worth it?
Try it both ways and see how it works for you.
Len
---
- Original Message - I've got a back-log of negatives
and slides to scan so I started messing
around with the BW negatives. My scanner only allows 1500
ppi resolution on
BW negatives but it goes up to 2400 for color negatives.
:-)
--- Oliver Raymond [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
STOP beating me to the punch ! :)
- Original Message -
From: Brendan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 2:04 PM
Subject: Re: 77 limited vs. 75mm f2.8 for 67? was
Re: FM3A dilemma
I
On Friday, January 11, 2002, at 03:52 PM, William Robb wrote:
I am, at this moment, admiring my 6x7 and 90mm LS lens mounted
to a bellows.
Very impressive.
I would hate you, but the SMCP-67 75mm f2.8 AL seems to emit some kind
of calming rays or something.
-Aaron
-
This message is from
It looks like I'm going to a conference in Oakland next month. I might have
a few hours to spare and am wondering about some good places to find PDML
members relaxing with their cameras...and maybe a beverage?
Cory Waters
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go
Dan Scott wrote:
Anyone on the list ever compare the image quality of Pentax's SMCP-A 15mm
f/3.5 to the Voigtlander Heliar 15mm f/4.5?
I could have done; I had a friend who used to have one, until he sold all his
film gear to go digital.
Subjective evaluations of either lens are fine.
Bruce Dayton wrote:
Since I have never used the K, I can't
make a fair comparison between them. I have been quite happy with mine
and it is one of the lenses that goes in the bag even when traveling
light.
I've used both (traded the 24/2.8K for the 24/2 FA*). The K is MUCH smaller
and
Geoff Moes asked:
If I use the extention tubes, what are the other effects. Do I loose the
ablility to focus to infinity, does it increase magnification of the lens?
Yes, because you can get closer.
Cheers,
- Dave
David A. Mann, B.E. (Elec)
Why is it that if an adult behaves like a
Artur Ledóchowski wrote:
Wow:)! Can you give some details on it? It's very important to me since I'm
going to get a Z-1p soon and read that it doesn't support the focus
confirmation feature for m42 lenses and I'd like to mount my MIR 20mm on the
camera...
All you need to do is make sure
HK Don't worry, I don't believe you will have offended anybody (unless
HK they're very sensitive)!
:)
HK My hypothesis as to why (spot) metering of darker faces doesn't work is
HK as follows. The lightmeter assumes 18% gray reflectance. However, in
HK this case, the reflectance will be much
1 - 100 of 159 matches
Mail list logo
