On 19 Feb 2002 at 14:05, Matamoros, Cesar A. wrote:
Had a 'date' with a fellow photographer on Sunday. We were going to
take some shots in a planned community about an hour west of here. I
knew that she shot Minolta autofocus.
As I was preparing my camera gear I was torn. It was
tic
You know what?
1) I've been on the list for about 3 years (off for one)..
2) I've been shooting a p67 for all of that time, rarely andy 35mm, and I'm
fed up of you newbie whippersnappers pretending you invented medium
format. I've been paying my brotherhood dues for all this time, but
On 18 Feb 2002 at 18:09, frank theriault wrote:
Looks like this is starting to come together.
Hmm. Expedia says it's only 9 hours to Toronto from here.
Hmmm.
tv
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't
Ermm.. Maybe I should explain the 'gathering faggots'...
Faggots are small cords of wood in Old English.
Not to be confused with modern American English vernacular
At 10:46 PM 2/18/2002 -0500, you wrote:
If you warship any god but the one true god you are an infidel. It is
always
that
I developed my very first roll of film at the weekend. It was a roll of
TRI-X 400. I used Kodak TMax developer, Ilfostop and Kodak fixer-hardener. I
was most elated at the results; my practicing with winding the film onto the
spools had paid off (no problems with the winding etc) and the negs
On Tue, 19 Feb 2002, Oliver Raymond wrote:
2) I've been shooting a p67 for all of that time, rarely andy 35mm, and I'm
fed up of you newbie whippersnappers pretending you invented medium
format. I've been paying my brotherhood dues for all this time, but
with no recognition.
3)
I don´t recall offhand. I tried a couple of minutes at a time.
-Original Message-
From: Christian Skofteland [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 2:56 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Spotmatic Enabled
Thanks. It's sitting in a cup of Coke right
Come on over then :)
--- tom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 18 Feb 2002 at 18:09, frank theriault wrote:
Looks like this is starting to come together.
Hmm. Expedia says it's only 9 hours to Toronto from
here.
Hmmm.
tv
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.
To
Hey it's a cool looking novel idea which Pentax can
claim yet another first. That and I'm sure it will
sell well and probably test technology and ideas for
the digi SLR ( Pentax are you reading this you'd
better be testing something in there for a digi SLR )
--- Ryan K. Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
i have heard it was designed on the specs for a perfect travel tripod
given by some editor (herb kep ??) of a photo mag (pop photo?).
On Tue, Feb 19, 2002 at 11:20:28AM -0800, Steven Gilson wrote:
Has anyone tried the Velbon Maxi 343? I've only read about in Pop Photo, but it
sounds to good
Aaron, you're alright for a 67 guy ;-) (LX wink)
I guess Joe Moviegoer doesn't know what Kodachrome is...
I had issues with the snow leopard prints too. Cats only leave one pair of
prints (l/r) because their back feet are placed deliberately into the prints
left by the forepaws. Ok,
On Tue, Feb 19, 2002 at 03:44:23PM -0500, Aaron Reynolds wrote:
On Tuesday, February 19, 2002, at 02:18 PM, Christian Skofteland wrote:
They show him sitting in a blind in Pakistan photographing
Snow Leopards witha Nikon F5. so far so good. His assistant drops a
roll of
film (to
Oliver Raymond wrote:
tic
You know what?
1) I've been on the list for about 3 years (off for one)..
2) I've been shooting a p67 for all of that time, rarely andy 35mm, and
I'm
fed up of you newbie whippersnappers pretending you invented medium
format. I've been paying my brotherhood dues
Cesar;
The snaked skinned LXen would only (see: EVER) be appropriate under certain
date situations:
1. A trip to the zoo
2. Meetings with environmental organizations.
3. A quiet night reading Kipling.
4. Your local SM club.
Christian
On Tuesday 19 February 2002 14:05, Cesar wrote:
Had a
tom [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] key-pecked on
Tuesday, February 19, 2002 3:41 PM
On 19 Feb 2002 at 14:05, Matamoros, Cesar A. wrote:
Had a 'date' with a fellow photographer on Sunday. We were going to
take some shots in a planned community about an hour west of here. I
knew that she
On 19 Feb 2002 at 15:50, Mick Maguire wrote:
I developed my very first roll of film at the weekend. It was a roll
of TRI-X 400. I used Kodak TMax developer, Ilfostop and Kodak
fixer-hardener. I was most elated at the results; my practicing with
winding the film onto the spools had paid off
I invested in a number of those CIA Spotmatics. They're set up
everywhere. I feel safe.
At 01:48 PM 2/19/2002 -0500, you wrote:
On Tuesday, February 19, 2002, at 01:25 PM, Peter Alling wrote:
(Gee, these brotherhood guys are crafty).
Thanks for noticing! The ninja assassination team will
That is cheating, you are half a brother of the brotherhood with that
camera.
Thanks for everyone who responded. It has generated several ideas I can try
out without investing much, and some that allow me to spend my money if I do
win the lottery.
Looking at BH I see the only right angle finder
Seems like a bit of overkill for that but you never know.
At 03:18 PM 2/19/2002 -0500, you wrote:
The only thing I could think of as I was looking at it was that it was to
do the same function as the roller that is in that spot in newer LX
cameras. That way, as the motor drive is chugging
Yes, it's normal, but not acceptable.
Did you attach a weight to the bottom of the film? I bet you didn't.
Use a film clip or make one that holds the film taut.
Mick Maguire wrote:
I developed my very first roll of film at the weekend.
[...] One thing which is bothering me though is
On 19 Feb 2002 at 16:13, Matamoros, Cesar A. wrote:
Dude, if she's using Minolta AF, she doesn't care about camera
aesthetics anyway.
- Hey, I couldn't say that openly, good thing she doesn't read this
list. And really she isn't into camera aesthetics as it her camera has
plenty
Can I post to the Gallery images I have created with a Ricoh KR-10 Super and
a Rikenon 70-210 F/3.9 lens ?
I do use a Pentax Mz-M and frequently interchange lenses with it.
Thanks.
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the
Cesar ...
I guess it all depends on what you're comfortable with, and what your
preferences and pretensions are. Speaking only for myself, I don't
really care what my gear looks like, although I do like to keep
everything nice looking. But hey, black tape, Pentax hoods on Leicas,
Contax hoods
Sometime ago this problem was dealt with quite extensively by the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] group. You might want to raise a query there if your
still having trouble removing the cover.
Otis
Christian Skofteland wrote:
Thanks. It's sitting in a cup of Coke right now! How long did you soak your
Oh God, Brendan, don't say that! Don't you remember the flame war maybe 6
months ago on this very subject, when someone said something very
similar? Aaaarrrgh!
But, seriously, someone please correct me, but was the consensus not that
Pentax equipment had to be used on themed months, but that
I think you are getting fag and faggot confused... I'm a brit and have never
heard a cigarette called a faggot, only a fag.
Regards,
/\/\ick...
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the
I think vinegar works.
-frank
Otis Wright, Jr. wrote:
Sometime ago this problem was dealt with quite extensively by the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] group. You might want to raise a query there if your
still having trouble removing the cover.
Otis
Christian Skofteland wrote:
Thanks. It's
Tom wrote:
then placing them under a few boxes of paper.
that's exactly what I have done :) it seems to have got rid of most of the
curl but not all. Unfortunately I got Kodak fixer/hardener (all in one).
Maybe I should try something else.
What kind of enlarger did you get?
On the advice of
Me, I'm bringing my new toy - the MX. I'd bring the Mat, but it is after
all, a Pentax gathering. Hey, Aaron, don't worry, I wuz only joking about a
6x7 ban. Not that anyone could stop you from bringing yours anyway! ;-)
regards,
frank
Aaron Reynolds wrote:
C'mon out! We need at least
that as the negs dried they developed a curl. not along the length of the
film but perpendicular to it. Is this normal when doing your own developing?
Is there something I can do to avoid it? I did wonder if I used the
Hi Mick,
Yeah, I put bulldog clips, one at either end to hold the film
Well, since eveyone else is giving you advice I can say this from
experience. When she looks into your eyes, smile.
From the Pentax Advice to the Lovlorn List.
Ciao,
Graywolf
- Original Message -
From: Matamoros, Cesar
Still wrong. That is not f8 it is 6.25mm for the 50mm lens and 62.5mm for
the 500. If your quoted web site tells you different they are wrong also.
Ciao,
Graywolf
- Original Message -
From: Mark Cassino [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In a message dated Tue, 19 Feb 2002 4:11:48 PM Eastern Standard Time, Nitin Garg
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, Feb 19, 2002 at 03:44:23PM -0500, Aaron Reynolds wrote:
On Tuesday, February 19, 2002, at 02:18 PM, Christian Skofteland wrote:
They show him sitting in a blind in
In a message dated 2/19/2002 3:53:42 PM Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Looking at BH I see the only right angle finder is the A and is only
$335.95, instead of the list price $550. The PZ-1 is not listed however as a
camera for which this finder might work.
Are there
I use the Slik 444-Sport II. http://www.tocad.com/14d.html It's not
perfect, but it meets my needs and it didn't break the bank (I think I
paid $120 for mine). It weighs 4 pounds and the max operating height
is 51. It folds up to 19, so it will fit in some backpacks. The head
doesn't do all
tom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 18 Feb 2002 at 18:09, frank theriault wrote:
Looks like this is starting to come together.
Hmm. Expedia says it's only 9 hours to Toronto from here.
Hmmm.
Rochester's even closer to Toronto.
Double hmm.
--
Mark Roberts
www.robertstech.com
-
This message is
I get yuh.
Can I transplant the metering from the Ricoh KR-10 Super into the MzM then??
lol
No problem I'll start using the Rikenon lens on the MZM.
- Original Message -
From: frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 7:00 PM
Subject: Re:
Also to consider, at 1:1 your f8 50mm is really an f16 100mm and your f8
500mm is really an f16 1000mm. But with a close up lens it works the other
way your lenses becomes something like an f8 25mm and an f8 250mm depending
on the diopter. Another thing is using a COC for the negative size is
On 19 Feb 2002 at 18:19, Mick Maguire wrote:
Tom wrote:
then placing them under a few boxes of paper.
that's exactly what I have done :) it seems to have got rid of most
of the curl but not all. Unfortunately I got Kodak fixer/hardener (all
in one). Maybe I should try something else.
Check the Dictionary, one that covers slang. The listing will be something
like this
Fag from Faggot having to do with a lit piece of wood, not the other kind.
At 06:12 PM 2/19/2002 -0500, you wrote:
I think you are getting fag and faggot confused... I'm a brit and have never
heard a cigarette
Wow. I've been up way too long -- 24 hours' work and 3 hours of sleep. I
thought that said Grandagon for a moment.
- Original Message -
From: Oliver Raymond [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 2:44 PM
Subject: Re: 67 Brotherhood
tic
You know
On 9 Feb 2002 at 14:39, William Robb wrote:
BTW, I love both animals, I don't see a problem having both,
why is
there such animosity between cat and dog owners here on
list?!?
Not animosity, per se, some of us just have a hard time
understanding why some people think cats have more
They are called binder-clips in the US.
I have the same issue with urling negs but after I put them in sleaves and
press them between heavy books the flatten out nicely
Christian
On Tuesday 19 February 2002 18:15, Cotty wrote:
Hi Mick,
Yeah, I put bulldog clips, one at either end to hold
On Tue, 19 Feb 2002 12:38:43 -0500, Mark Cassino wrote:
[...] converting color film to grayscale, aside from de-saturating [...]
[individual color channels] sometimes are more interesting than just
desaturating, and sort of simulate the effects of using a color filter
with BW.
I've found
That is it, try vinegar. It worked for me.
Steve Larson
Redondo Beach, California
- Original Message -
From: frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 3:02 PM
Subject: Re: Spotmatic Enabled
I think vinegar works.
-frank
Otis Wright,
On Tue, 19 Feb 2002 13:20:50 -0500, Peter Alling wrote:
This guy thinks he's a Zen photographer, kind of like Chevy Chase in
caddy shack ... see the camera, be the camera ... Repeat about 1000
time until you think you're results look like Ansel Adams.
http://johnlind.tripod.com/tips.html
Hi all,
The subject line says it all, I am looking
for a Spotmatic F for Parts, namely, the
top cover. Let me know.
BTW, Minolta Autocords beat the snot out of Yashica
124G!
Dave (owner of 2 Autocords)
Yahoo! Sports - Coverage of the 2002 Olympic Games
http://sports.yahoo.com
-
This message
I didn't say it isn't a joke. Just my take on his approach. I make
no judgments on whether it's supposed to be funny or not.
At 07:16 PM 2/19/2002 -0500, you wrote:
On Tue, 19 Feb 2002 13:20:50 -0500, Peter Alling wrote:
This guy thinks he's a Zen photographer, kind of like Chevy Chase in
Mick Maguire wrote:
One thing which is bothering me though is that as the negs
dried they developed a curl. not along the length of the film
but perpendicular to it. Is there something I can do to avoid it?
Any thoughts / pointers?
get the negative sleeve pages for a 3-ring
- Original Message -
From: Oliver Raymond
Subject: Re: 67 Brotherhood
tic
You know what?
1) I've been on the list for about 3 years (off for one)..
2) I've been shooting a p67 for all of that time, rarely andy
35mm, and I'm
fed up of you newbie whippersnappers pretending you
On 19 Feb 2002 at 6:40, Mark Roberts wrote:
tom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 18 Feb 2002 at 18:09, frank theriault wrote:
Looks like this is starting to come together.
Hmm. Expedia says it's only 9 hours to Toronto from here.
When are you moving to Pittsburgh?
tv
-
This message is
- Original Message -
From: Chris Brogden
Subject: Re: P67 myth
I don't think anyone here has seriously bashed small format.
Well, except
maybe for Wheatfield, but he's a self-admitted bastard to
begin with. ;)
I resemble that remark.
WW
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail
I give up. Macro of 3D objects with the
P67 SUCKS. The depth of field is so
damn shallow that its nearly impossible
to shoot small objects with any depth.
Heres a shot using the 135mm F4 SMCT.
I used the smallest possible aperture
( F32), #3 extension tube, full power
flash and TMAX 400 film:
- Original Message -
From: frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 6:01 AM
Subject: Re: Pentax fast glass?
Myth?
http://pug.komkon.org/00apri/Clown.html
http://pug.komkon.org/00febr/Regina.htm
From: Oliver Raymond
I want to be the GrandDragon (or whatever yanks call their
Brotherhood's leaders)..
Grand Poo-Bah
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at
- Original Message -
From: frank theriault
Subject: Re: user gallery posting
Oh God, Brendan, don't say that! Don't you remember the flame
war maybe 6
months ago on this very subject, when someone said something
very
similar? Aaaarrrgh!
But, seriously, someone please correct me,
I was trying to be droll...
You guys in the Brotherhood gotta lighten up a bit. :-) You'll just
end up driving away folks like me who are still sitting on the fence.
-frank
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message -
From: frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 19 Feb 2002, Aaron Reynolds wrote:
The Pentax 67 is only big or heavy when compared to the smallest and
lightest of 35mm cameras.
i.e. those made by Pentax. It's hard to see how it could be much smaller
though - it's only a little wider than the film path, and only a little
taller
So, you should drive up for the day. Hey, with our Canuck Buck being
down around 60 cents on the US$, think of the bargains!!
-frank
Mark Roberts wrote:
Rochester's even closer to Toronto.
Double hmm.
--
The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The
pessimist fears it
- Original Message -
From: J. C. O'Connell
Subject: Macro with the p67 SUCKS
try backing off just a bit from the subject, as this will
increase DOF greatly, and still give you a lot more negative to
enlarge from than 35mm. I found this was what I needed to do
when shooting model cars
tom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 19 Feb 2002 at 6:40, Mark Roberts wrote:
tom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 18 Feb 2002 at 18:09, frank theriault wrote:
Looks like this is starting to come together.
Hmm. Expedia says it's only 9 hours to Toronto from here.
When are you moving to
Looks like I've had a positive outcome related to the question I had about whether my
new 645NII was USA warranty covered or not, and have also learned a bit in the process.
After talking with several folks at Pentax I now know that Pentax Corp. (USA) does in
fact affix the hologram P to all
could WE!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of J. C. O'Connell
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 10:20 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: 67 Brotherhood
Could be gracefully end this thread?
It's wearing thin...
JCO
-
This
But the Ricoh is at least K mount, But yeah only open
Gallery months.
--- Christien Bunting [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I get yuh.
Can I transplant the metering from the Ricoh KR-10
Super into the MzM then??
lol
No problem I'll start using the Rikenon lens on the
MZM.
- Original
Ahem Or Canadian, My God those planes look good, and
so do those
pictures :)
--- Richard Seaman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
folks,
If these phrases mean anything to you then
you're probably (1) British;
(2) an aircraft enthusiast; (3) both. In any case,
you might be interested
to see
I remember having seen some discussion about this, but don't
remember if it was on this forum.
I believe there is a kit of sort that one could buy to process
color slide film at home.
My questions are:
How many rolls do you have to process before it becomes
economical, not counting one's own
- - Original Message -
From: Matamoros, Cesar A. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
So is it vanity that one considers the appearance of their camera
gear - to some extent.?
Yes.
Although I would not be impressed by someone with a swanky new camera. Too
ostentatious. Their camera would have
Is the list down or is it just me?
Evan
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Just you.
At 08:50 AM 2/15/2002 -0500, you wrote:
Is the list down or is it just me?
Evan
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
-
This
Isn`t it against the law or something to have a lens that sharp ;)
Steve Larson
Redondo Beach, California
- Original Message -
From: J. C. O'Connell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 7:06 PM
Subject: The 50mm SMCT Kicks Butt!
Looking over some of
Pong
Regards,
Bob...
Let us contemplate our forefathers, and posterity,
and resolve to maintain the rights bequeathed to us
from the former, for the sake of the latter.
- Samuel Adams, 1771
From: Evan Hanson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is the list down or is it just me?
-
This
It's just you. You need to resub.
Doug
At 8:50 AM -05002/15/02, Evan Hanson wrote, or at least typed:
Is the list down or is it just me?
Evan
--
Douglas Forrest Brewer
Ashwood Lake Photography
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.alphoto.com
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To
- Original Message -
From: Steve Larson
Subject: Re: The 50mm SMCT Kicks Butt!
Isn`t it against the law or something to have a lens that
sharp ;)
Too bad the prints are so grainy,,,
HAR!!
WW
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to
And I thought I was being clever.
At 08:25 PM 2/19/2002 -0800, you wrote:
Pong
Regards,
Bob...
Let us contemplate our forefathers, and posterity,
and resolve to maintain the rights bequeathed to us
from the former, for the sake of the latter.
- Samuel Adams, 1771
From:
Herbert Kepler. Once Editor Modern Photography now doing the SLR column for
Popular Photography. Who's review of the MX/ME was one of the factors that
helped me decide on buying a MX.
At 03:54 PM 2/19/2002 -0500, you wrote:
i have heard it was designed on the specs for a perfect travel tripod
Never!
Ciao,
Graywolf
- Original Message -
From: J. C. O'Connell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 10:22 PM
Subject: RE: 67 Brotherhood
could WE!
-Original Message-
As a proud Ricohflex owner I can direct him to this site:
http://www.angelfire.com/ca/erker/ricohflex.html
Probably will tell him more about the cameras than he wants to know. CC:
directly to him.
Ciao,
Graywolf
- Original
Isn`t it against the law or something to have a lens that sharp ;)
I don't know, Steve, but JCO had better be careful - it's so sharp
he might cut himself using it - g.
Fred
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the
Just proves the SMCT is better than film!
JCO P.S. The closeup is an extreme crop.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of William Robb
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 11:46 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: The 50mm SMCT Kicks
From Cameta Camera's most recent mailing. A good choice for Brotherhood
of the Dark medium format people:
Schneider Componon-S 135mmf5.6 Ser.#13279837 Current Model Enlarging
Lens
With Illuminated F-Stops Selector Switch For Click Or Continuous
F-Stop
Settings. Includes Both Original Lens
I'm jealous. Very nice.
Ciao,
Graywolf
- Original Message -
From: Richard Seaman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 10:03 PM
Subject: Supermarine, Sea Fury, Sea Venom
folks,
It's got decent bokeh too!
JCO
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Fred
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 11:46 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: The 50mm SMCT Kicks Butt!
Isn`t it against the law or something to have a lens
Not really ...
J. C. O'Connell wrote:
Just proves the SMCT is better than film!
JCO P.S. The closeup is an extreme crop.
--
Shel Belinkoff
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://home.earthlink.net/~belinkoff/
You can't have everything. Where would you put it?
-
This message is from the
In a message dated 2/19/2002 9:52:10 PM Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Subj:Processing color slide film at home
Date:2/19/2002 9:52:10 PM Central Standard Time
From:A HREF=mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED];[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A
Reply-to:A HREF=mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED];[EMAIL
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Note: None of the weights include batteries, which, in the case of the
67 and the Nikon can add quite a few more grams. The LX and the
Mamiya use smaller and fewer batteries.
The Pentax 67 uses the same size battery as the digital spot meter.
I think the thing that
Brendan wrote:
Cause it's not Fuji velvia
That's reason enough for me to use Kodak Max.
Cheers,
- Dave
http://www.digistar.com/~dmann/ (out of date)
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
On Tue, 19 Feb 2002 22:01:05 -0500, Robert Harris wrote:
Or should it be the Grand Bloated Pooh Bah. :)
That depends on whether it's before or after the Grandfather Mountain
Nature Photo Weekend. :-) {with a ;^) to KG4LOV}
TTYL, DougF KG4LMZ
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail
- Original Message -
From: David A. Mann
Subject: Re: P67 myth
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Note: None of the weights include batteries, which, in the
case of the
67 and the Nikon can add quite a few more grams. The LX and
the
Mamiya use smaller and fewer batteries.
The Pentax 67
I was of the impression that the 67 used several AA batteries, including
one for the mirror. The F5 uses a few batteries as well. That's why I
specifically mentioned it.
William Robb wrote:
Ummm, I don't really think the weight of the batteries really
makes a lot of difference WRT the
Nice pictures, Richard, and take me back to my youth on the south coast of
England, when all three were still in RAF service, and often to be seen live
and for real around where I lived!
I can't be there myself, but if the Biggin Hill Air Show is still on and in
your time-frame, you will have
On Tue, 19 Feb 2002, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
I was of the impression that the 67 used several AA batteries, including
one for the mirror. The F5 uses a few batteries as well. That's why I
specifically mentioned it.
Nope, the 67 uses a 28L battery, which is quite small.
Brother Chris, P67B
-
Got one from a friend who wants to sell it either to me
or to someone. The adapter that is on it now is a bayonet
but definitely not for pentax. Any experience with this lens
pro and con? Or how easily acquired the adapter is?
and if anyone has any experience with the so-called Kodak
one of which is a photo taken with an LX that was
in Best of Photography Annual in 1984. I fess up that it is mine (i.e.,
the seller's)
in that one but in a drawing of mine I just say it was initialed and
dated.
photo is item 1076209341
drawing is 1516949549
My other stuff has suddenly been
Tell him you'll trade him the antique for a shiny new nickel...
hey... c'mon... you know you people were thinking it!
Gabe
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 9:02 PM
Subject: Re: Can anyone help out a sixth-grader?
In
On Tue, Feb 19, 2002 at 05:57:18PM -0500, Aaron Reynolds wrote:
On Tuesday, February 19, 2002, at 04:10 PM, Nitin Garg wrote:
They wouldn't get the kodak MAX is a good film connection. And most of
the viewers wont know what E200 film is.
Yeah, but the big Kodak label would still push
- Original Message -
From: Shel Belinkoff
Subject: Re: P67 myth
I was of the impression that the 67 used several AA batteries,
including
one for the mirror. The F5 uses a few batteries as well.
That's why I
specifically mentioned it.
The 6x7 uses a PX28 (4 MS 76 batteries in a
On Tue, Feb 19, 2002 at 06:23:36PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Seriously, though, did Kodak think that the average moviegoer would not
get the Kodak-is-good-film connection if O'Donnell were shooting E200 or
Supra or any one of their actual pro films? Instead, they just
Ooh, sounds good. That's a 4x5 lens, exactly what I need. Do you have a URL
for Cameta?
Paul
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
From Cameta Camera's most recent mailing. A good choice for Brotherhood
of the Dark medium format people:
Schneider Componon-S 135mmf5.6 Ser.#13279837 Current Model Enlarging
Cameta Camera
253 Broadway (Route 110)
Amityville, NY 11701 USA
phone: 631-598-3350
fax: 631-691-1019
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
web: http://www.cameta.com
Paul Stenquist wrote:
Ooh, sounds good. That's a 4x5 lens, exactly what I need. Do you have a URL
for Cameta?
Paul
--
Shel Belinkoff
The role of the vegetarian technical writer is a difficult and often
thankless one, but it is essential to the orderly implementation of a
PC lifestyle. In brief, the vegetarian technical writer, or VTW,
describes the properties of various edible plants in great detail. He or
she provides
101 - 200 of 208 matches
Mail list logo
