I'm sure that the product/program staff dial in at least when they need a laugh.
Otis
Rob Studdert wrote:
On 13 Oct 2002 at 19:36, Brad Dobo wrote:
Hey,
It seems that those who replied to my email only argued one point. That Big
Brother is watching.
I don't know that BB is
I¹m pondering buying a not-too-costly fish-eye lens as it will not be used a
great deal. However, I would like something capable of producing sharp
8X10-inch prints and, once in a while, an 11X14. Does anybody know how good
the Sigma F2.8 multicoated Sigma XQ filtermatic lens is? I believe it¹s a
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I wonder how many megabytes it would take to compete with a 20x24
negative.
Just one pixel would be sufficient if you forgot the dark slide...
Cheers,
- Dave
http://www.digistar.com/~dmann/
At 00:33 14.10.2002 -0600, you wrote:
I¹m pondering buying a not-too-costly fish-eye lens as it will not be used a
great deal. However, I would like something capable of producing sharp
8X10-inch prints and, once in a while, an 11X14. Does anybody know how good
the Sigma F2.8 multicoated Sigma XQ
What if I told you that I am a Pentax Executive? What type of company would
Pentax be? From my mail can you guess what I would be planning? :)
- Original Message -
From: Otis Wright, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 2:27 AM
Subject: Re:
Anyone else have any experience or opinion to share?
I now carry two films, Portra 160NC and consumer superia 400. I have
settled on them being the ones that give the best results in both my SLR and
PS. Tried the portra 400 films and find that detail seems lacking, not
worth the money!
They don't advertise. They must advertise like Nikon and Canon if you
ever
want to see USM, IS, DSLR, etc, because then people will know about our
little company called Pentax. Because they do not advertise, they find
few
buyers, and that does not help with profits.
Question.
USM would
Hi All,
All the discussion about the abscence of pentax in the SLR digital
market, the woeful signs of some pros who lurk these halls beginning to
sell their pentax gear in disgust.
I'm selling my nice stuff too, but for different reasons: I feel
compelled to reduce my equipment into more
William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 13/10/2002 4:56:39 PM:
I liked this list a lot more when it was about film and
photography.
I hear that Doug is working on the problem. Here's some gossip from the
caves: remember the list's digest mode problem a few days ago ? That
was just a drill.
Nope, I don't care for it at all. There are those that do...hence my
insertion of it.
Brad Dobo
- Original Message -
From: Tim S Kemp [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 3:08 AM
Subject: Re: Reality Check Part 4
They don't advertise. They must
I feel unique and proud. And I like most of you! Ya! I have
learned much from this group, and enjoy it every day. So don't see me in a
bad light, I'm actually quite a nice guy. :) I am just sick of the talk of
equipment that does not now, nor maybe ever, exist. I'd like to talk about
Sorry you feel that way Brad some of us remember the switch over. Why
sponser a group
if you're going to ignore it. Why stop watching once it's self
supporting. Hell
I have a friend who's job was to search the Internet for information about
his company
and the competition. This is easier
A couple of weeks ago I asked the list about a wide-angle replacement for my
Tokina 19-35mm f3.5-4.5. Well, I have had to revise my desire to replace
this little lens since getting some film back today. The trannies I have
just got back are from a recent trip to Tasmania. I must say the little
Dearest Cotty,
Ahhh...the feeling of being lovedthere is nothing to compare.
Since you will say this only once, I can ignore it completely once.
If only it was so easy as deleting the threadshard to write a rule
unless everyone puts 'DSLR' in the subject.
If this is a discussion
dedicated to the Minolta love of your life!
http://cgi.ebay.com.au/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=1389761591
Cheers,
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
UTC(GMT) +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications.html
In Italy the D100 has been on sale and in stock for at
least a month, as has the D60
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Faith Hill - Exclusive Performances, Videos More
http://faith.yahoo.com
- Original Message -
From: MPozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 5:45 AM
Subject: RE: dslr
In Italy the D100 has been on sale and in stock for at
least a month, as has the D60
I dunno about that camera stuff, but I do know I'd do a Yahoo with
Haven't we already had that thread?
Regards,
Anthony Farr
- Original Message -
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(snip)
Let's start a thread about the Popes sex life.
(snip)
For some reason I get a vision of King Knut commanding the tide not to rise
:-)
Regards,
Anthony Farr
- Original Message -
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(snip)
I liked this list a lot more when it was about film and
photography. I thought I had useful stuff to contribute back
The T-80 was a Canon. Pre EOS AF. Interesting thing about Canon and Nikon is that they
are proud enough of their products to have Museum/History areas on their Japanese
web sites (translated into English). It's interesting to read about what they though
of their competitors, what they
On Sun, 13 Oct 2002, Malcolm Smith wrote:
A fair point. You must also consider the point that the real money is to be
made with the take up of new camera users (90% of new camera sales to under
20s is digital), and maybe they consider what sells now is more important to
the company. I know as
Nope. not much advertising at all. Its just been this way, I guess.
But it soon might change here too. N and C are advertising quite a lot - and
on their complete range, and not just high end. In one of the popular
photography mags, there are ads for the Coolpix 5700, EOS D60, 66. Different
ads
On Sun, 13 Oct 2002, William Robb wrote:
Hi;
My computer is set up to shut the hard drives off after a few
minutes of inactivity.
Is this a good thing, or should they run all the time?
Thanks
Technically, its better to let them run all the time, as it saves wear and
tear on the drive having
Brad Dobo wrote:
Hey Paul,
I'm really torn on the issue. I know shopping via the web is ever growing
and much more safe than ever, but I really don't feel comfortable laying
down a sizeable amount of cash like that.
annsan replies:
Brad, you can use escrow on ebay if the item is pricy
At 06:15 AM 10/14/2002 -0400, Brad wrote:
Go Leafs Go (yup, that time of the year again!)
Yes, I did notice that they were falling from the trees at an alarming rate.
Roll on the snow, eh ;-)
Wendy
Doesn't Wegman regularly use one of these super-sized Polaroids?
Evan
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Had dinner and symphony tonight with an old friend of ours.
Her date, John, was sick and canceled at the last minute.
She said he regretted doing so because he wanted to talk cameras.
And
On Sun, 13 Oct 2002, Brad Dobo wrote:
happens? They simply just jump the surge barrier. In that case, you are in
trouble, but there is nothing you can do against it besides unplugging every
component after use. The upside? This rarely happens.
When in doubt, buy a line conditioner, which
Cesar Matamoros II wrote:
There were
a couple of shots of Avedon's that were blurred and I would not think to
display them, but they were of famous people and that made them worthy of
exhibition...
Cesar, that is a surprising comment. Is taht really what you meant???
ann
I cannot understand why some people continue to make
statements such as these. I have been a full-time
photographer for the past three years. And I know that
there are other's in here as well. And the only
camera gear that I have, that I have ever had, is
Pentax 35mm. Granted, a good majority of
Sorry, responded to the wrong email
tv
-Original Message-
From: Brad Dobo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, October 13, 2002 10:29 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Digital! I got digital! Long but worth
actually reading!
Tom, you lost me on that one :)
-Original Message-
From: Christian Skofteland [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
HA! Already pushing the Introduction date off by 3 months!
I thought you
said Spring... ;-) You don't work for Pentax do you?
Well, Bruce said never, so I can hedge my bet a bit, can't I?
tv
-Original Message-
From: Bruce Rubenstein [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
They are sold out in a number of places, but they are shipping.
I have a nice, working Program Plus that says you can't buy
one in the US,
because they aren't being shipped (yet/ever), on 9/1/03.
Ok, we'll say
-Original Message-
From: Peter Alling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, October 13, 2002 11:36 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Reality Checks Part 3
That's very true. The only new piece of equipment that's
tempted me in a long
time was the Nikon FM3a. If Pentax
Rob,
Reala is one of my favorite films. If this new NPH is anything like
it, I'll have to give it a try. I have used the old NPH and found it
fine - just not as nice as Portra 400NC/VC. But I'll sure give it
another go around. Thanks for the tip!
Bruce
Monday, October 14, 2002, 3:20:21
-Original Message-
From: William Robb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Fer Christs sake Rob, of course I'm correct about the pro spec
stuff. You know what Pentax has marketed over the past 4 decades
as well as I have.
The LX was a one off camera, with no history from the
manufacturer
-Original Message-
From: Brad Dobo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
And come on guys, you want Pentax to know what you think?
Write a letter
addressed to their main headquarters. Write a lot,
everyone write one,
start a petition list. Don't believe that Pentax spies
watch this
I find that Portra is about a 1/3 to a 1/2 stop over-rated and the
color is off on non-kodak paper. There's a peak in magenta sensitivity
that matches a dip in the paper. Looks great on Kodak paper, crappy on
Fuji.
My lab uses Fuji, they like Fuji, Fuji is rated correctly - I use
Fuji. NPZ is
-Original Message-
From: Brad Dobo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Anyone who is serious about photography, or a professional,
uses (in here)
Pentax Medium Format. Big Brother is going to say, let's
work on them.
I use both.
Dispite the bickering we have had some members make
On Mon, 14 Oct 2002, Reg Wiest wrote:
1980s lens. Perhaps, I¹d be just as well off to buy a new Russian Zenitar
lens??? Does anybody have experience with either of these lenses?
I own one of those Zenitar 16/2.8 lenses, and I'm quite happy with it. I
don't know if I've printed anything to 8x10
This stuff has been out for a while, I've used it at several weddings.
To be honest, I don't see much of a difference between it and the
older stuff.
--
Thomas Van Veen Photography
www.bigdayphoto.com
301-758-3085
-Original Message-
From: Rob Brigham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
Only question I have is how did you find this, on second thought I don't
want to know.
At 07:10 PM 10/14/2002 +1000, you wrote:
dedicated to the Minolta love of your life!
http://cgi.ebay.com.au/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=1389761591
Cheers,
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel
On Mon, 14 Oct 2002, Cotty wrote:
Anyone who works for a large organisation will know that the PR dept have
people watching the media and net for feedback on product/services. It is
standard practice. I have no doubt at all that a Pentax Bod is reading
this email. Hi. Bet you're dying to say
On Mon, 14 Oct 2002, Brad Dobo wrote:
I'm really torn on the issue. I know shopping via the web is ever growing
and much more safe than ever, but I really don't feel comfortable laying
down a sizeable amount of cash like that. Everyone here is really into that
it seems, I think I would buy
On Mon, 14 Oct 2002, Anthony Farr wrote:
For all anybody really knows a Pentax DSLR will be based on a Morgan Plus 8
chassis, or carved from a bar of soap.
If they carve it from soap, I don't want to see anyone's bath pictures...
Tom,
My lab uses Agfa paper and chemicals. I have found that they do
Portra very well (looks great - must be the Fuji paper+Portra that
don't mix) and mediocre on the Fuji stuff. One wonders if I am rating
the film wrong. I rated both films (portra and Fuji) at box values.
The Fuji comes out
William Johnson schrieb:
A100/2.8
K100/4
FA200/4
Thanks for your vote!
Arnold
-Original Message-
From: Bruce Dayton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Tom,
My lab uses Agfa paper and chemicals. I have found that they do
Portra very well (looks great - must be the Fuji paper+Portra that
don't mix) and mediocre on the Fuji stuff.
For months my lab bitched at me
FA 100/2.8 macro
A 100/2.8 macro
FA 50/2.8 macro
tv
Hell I don't know. All I know is that I have 3 MX's to make sure that I
have a mechanical backup camera until I'm to old to see, or I die whichever
comes first. I often find myself places where a.) I cannot buy anything but
the most basic, i.e. AAA AA C D cells, or b.) where the cost of
Every - that is EVERY - piece of photographic equipment I currently use was
purchased on eBay or an online store. Do I worry about laying a sizeable
chunk of money on the internet? Nope!
Christian
On Monday 14 October 2002 06:27, Brad Dobo wrote:
I'm really torn on the issue. I know
You were looking?
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=1389613457
Well I'd say it depends on the person in question don't you think?
At 10:37 AM 10/14/2002 -0400, you wrote:
On Mon, 14 Oct 2002, Anthony Farr wrote:
For all anybody really knows a Pentax DSLR will be based on a Morgan Plus 8
chassis, or carved from a bar of soap.
If they carve it from soap,
Really sorry I missed it guys. Glad to see Bob made it, makes me feel
slightly less guilty for cancelling. At least a few of us turned up to
look after Stan!
Some great shots, but one question: What was that woman doing with the
vaseline and apron?!? Was it some weird sexual practice, or was
Duh!!
Was meant for someone other than you lot.
William Robb
- Original Message -
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 9:23 AM
Subject: 6x7 grip
You were looking?
http://www.jesusdressup.com/
Here are the results of the SMC Pentax K-Mount Macro Lens Poll:
1st Place (31 points): SMC Pentax-A Macro 1:2.8 100mm
2nd Place (29 points): SMC Pentax-A* Macro 1:4 200mm ED
3rd Place (27 points): SMC Pentax-FA* Macro 1:4 200mm EDIF
4th Place (22 points): SMC Pentax-FA Macro 1:2.8 100mm
5th
Thought i would chime in on this one too. I have two tokina lenses the
28-70 26./2.8 and the 80-200 2.8 I cant say enough good things about these
lenses. they are great performers in all conditions. i would highly
recommend them.
__
D O T E
Ok, most of you (except those that put Brad Dobo on an ignore
list) have read my emails.
Aw, you're not ~that~ bad, Brad - I've never had to filter you out
of my inbox (as I have had to do with the who - a.k.a. Gregory -
and SudaMafud). ;-)
I am just sick of the talk of equipment that does
I think Tokina lenses are at the top of the class. My only three
non-pentax lenses are Tokina 100-300ATX/f4, 90/2.5ATX macro and
a 24mm.
My own non-Pentax lenses tend to be either Tokina AT-X or Vivitar
Series 1, and (when the choices are essentially identical, as with
the AT-X 90/2.5 Macro
All Pentax users should be concerned that long time users like
John (who will obviously loss a substantial amount of cash in his
transition to an alternate system) have been forced into this
position due to the poor marketing and lack of communications
from Pentax :-(
Agreed. It is truly
1.4 XL and 2.0 XL teleconverters
F* 300/f4.5
A* 200/f4 ED IF Macro
K 200/f2.5 (two)
M 85/f2
FA 50/f2.8 Macro
A 50/f1.2
1.7x AF Adapter
Vivitar Series 1 70-180/f4.5 Macro cult classic
John is selling a lot of really nice stuff, and I can personally
vouch for the quality of the above
SMC-A 50/2.8 lens and case. A beautiful lens. Made dispensible
when I bought an FA 50/2.8 lens from list member Tom V.
The A 50/2.8 Macro is a truly beautiful little lens. It is (sadly)
not quite as sharp as are the F or FA 50/2.8's, but the A version is
so well made, so compact, and so
This is a discussion forum and as such talk of a DSLR is (IMO)
very much on topic, and there are folk here who like discussing
it. Just because you don't, does not mean that we cannot.
1. I do agree with the appropriateness of such speculation topics
as the interminable threads on digital
[snip] I must say the little Tokina performed really well. [snip]
I shot an all Tokina kit on this trip, other than an FA 100mm f2.8
macro (which as anyone who has one knows is a stunning lens). I am
really impressed with the Tokina glass I took along (28-80 ATX-Pro
f2.8 and an 80-200mm
NORM!
tv
-Original Message-
From: Norm Baugher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 2:56 PM
To: PDML
Subject: 50mm 1.4 v. 1.7
I say my 50/1.4 is just as sharp as the 50/1.7 when
stopped down to
1.7
Norm
There's some guy on the infrared list selling 70mm HIE and EIR that
he's re-cut into 120 spools.
http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/ir_list.htm
tv
-Original Message-
From: Norm Baugher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 2:56 PM
To: PDML
Subject: Infrared in
Hello PDML,
yes, now I would like to ask you to, what prime lenses would you like
that Pentax would have built in k-mount at some time in the past
(starting 1975), or that Pentax would come out with now
If in the past or now the Pentax boss owed you a favour, what prime lens
would you have
On Mon, 14 Oct 2002, Norm Baugher wrote:
Any suggestions? Doesn't seem to be a lot of choices.
The Ilford SFX200 and Konica 750 are both near IR (with Konica being
alot near-er!) and I believe they both come in 120. There's also the Maco
820, which I believe is real IR film.
I think that's
On Mon, 14 Oct 2002, Norm Baugher wrote:
How do I keep the monitor from fogging my film?
Safelight filter? ;)
Is this number 3? The fish market thing fizzled out...Grigolia went by
himself...
Anyway, the 3rd semi-irregular DC Pentax group get-together is planned
for 10/22 at 19:30 at the Hard Times Cafe in College Park, MD. So far
we've got Geoff, Christian, Cesar, Mark, Glenn and me. #7 is iffy, but
a
Yes, I feel that SOMEONE will produce a K-mount Digital SLR. There's a vast body of
users out there waiting to part with some cash - too many to ignore. I figure it'll
happen when the technology has settled down a bit.
Anton
The FA 100/3.5 it is! I don't have any true macro lenses, and it can't feel any worse
than a Nikon AF50/1.8.
BR
-Original Message-
From: tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 12:59 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: dslr
Nope, just AF500FTZ's.
Lens name: FA 35mm f/1.4
Length: big
Diameter: fat
Weight: heavy
Filter Thread: yes
Other:
Lens name: FA 20-35/2.8
Length: big
Diameter: fat
Do you think Pentax will really outsource the whole body just to get into the market?
I don't know about this. Pentax would have done better using the Foveon chip from the
beginning. That chip has a lot of sizzle to it judging by the threads on Photo Pro
Digital.
BR
-Original
Open the camera back in full sunlight to pre fog it.
BR
-Original Message-
From: Norm Baugher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 2:56 PM
To: PDML
Subject: Digital Darkroom Question
How do I keep the monitor from fogging my film?
Norm
What a refreshing thread - no mention of a non-existant Pentax DSLR :-)
Good luck with the camera club - it should be nice to have some themes
imposed on you, so that you would shoot something you wouldn't otherwise.
Cheers,
Lukasz
On Mon, 14 Oct 2002, Arnold Stark wrote:
yes, now I would like to ask you to, what prime lenses would you like
that Pentax would have built in k-mount at some time in the past
(starting 1975), or that Pentax would come out with now
I want an A50/1.0.
Doesn't mean I'd buy it, but its what
Yes, but the larger aperture of the 1.4 makes it a better magnifying glass, emergency
cigarette lighter.
BR
-Original Message-
From: Norm Baugher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 2:56 PM
To: PDML
Subject: 50mm 1.4 v. 1.7
I say my 50/1.4 is just as
Hi,
I noticed Bob moved in pretty quickly though ;-)
I've always been a sucker for the line it's all part of the
post-colonial experience.
I keep thinking about the guy with the rings in his face. I may
go back again in the next couple of weeks with a 100mm macro lens
and pocket full of £s
On Mon, 14 Oct 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, I feel that SOMEONE will produce a K-mount Digital SLR. There's a
vast body of users out there waiting to part with some cash - too many
to ignore. I figure it'll happen when the technology has settled down
a bit.
Well, there's plenty of
- Original Message -
From: Rubenstein, Bruce M (Bruce)
Subject: RE: 50mm 1.4 v. 1.7
Yes, but the larger aperture of the 1.4 makes it a better
magnifying glass, emergency cigarette lighter.
It holds more beer to.
William Robb
I am tired of the speculation regarding if or when Pentax will sell a dslr. Since
none exists why don't we restrict any mention of a dslr on one day only, say Friday.
Pentax users of the PS digitals can write about those anytime since they do exist.
Fridays can be fantasy DSLR day.
Jim A.
On Mon, 14 Oct 2002, [windows-1250] £ukasz Kacperczyk wrote:
What a refreshing thread - no mention of a non-existant Pentax DSLR :-)
I tried.
Good luck with the camera club - it should be nice to have some themes
imposed on you, so that you would shoot something you wouldn't otherwise.
I
On Mon, 14 Oct 2002, Bob Walkden wrote:
I keep thinking about the guy with the rings in his face. I may
go back again in the next couple of weeks with a 100mm macro lens
and pocket full of £s and do some really in-yer-face portraits on
Scala.
Ahem, there's NOTHING wrong with a few piercings
On Mon, 14 Oct 2002, jim apilado wrote:
I am tired of the speculation regarding if or when Pentax will sell a
dslr. Since none exists why don't we restrict any mention of a dslr
on one day only, say Friday.
At my job, we have a day we call Thursdax which is the one day where one
of our
Finally somebody brings some common sense into discussions...
Nice to hear from you, Norm.
Matjaz
I say my 50/1.4 is just as sharp as the 50/1.7 when stopped down to
1.7 Norm
Past performance is not a guarantte of future performance, but it certainly is
an indication of what to expect in the future, cya statements to the contrary
notwithstanding.
Kenneth Waller wrote:
As most stock brochures state...Past history is no in indication of future
performance.
Ken
Ok, the bet is that Pentax will have a digital slr for sale by 9/1/03.
For sale means it's listed on a major camera retailer's web site. If
you win, you get my FA 100/3.5. If I win, I get your Program Plus.
Deal?
tv
-Original Message-
From: Rubenstein, Bruce M (Bruce) [mailto:[EMAIL
Norm wonders ...
How do I keep the monitor from fogging my film?
... perhaps a ball peen hammer ??? !8^D
Bill
-
Bill D. Casselberry ; Photography on the Oregon Coast
FWIW, Steve Wozniak once said that he never turned off any of his computers,
except for the monitors.
Dan
Brad Dobo wrote:
As a real computer and internet junkie, and part-time tech, I *always* leave
my stuff on. On thing is I turn of monitors at night. Running XP Pro on 2
computers, on
Norm Baugher wrote:
Any suggestions? Doesn't seem to be a lot of choices.
The fellow respooling 70mm HIE is named David Romano. It
is a bit spendy for the minimum 5-rolls, but it sure sounds
like a lot of fun to try out! If I come across my reference
I'll
Read Mike Johnston's Sunday Morning Photographer column from yesterday.
http://www.luminous-landscape.com/columns/sm-10-06.shtml
It's a very interesting read on the difference between a pro and an amateur,
and the importance of careful editing. But maybe I like it so much, because
it seems the
I agree with the Portra being overrated. Last time I shot 160 NC I rated it at 125 in
my Spotmatic. It was printed on Kodak Royal paper. Looked good.
Robert
-Original Message-
From: tom[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon Oct 14 07:32:47 PDT 2002
Subject: Re: Pentax and
Hmmm... you do mean 2103, right? :) Should be a pretty safe bet that
they'll have made one before then. Or is that January 9th of 2003? :)
chris
On Mon, 14 Oct 2002, tom wrote:
Ok, the bet is that Pentax will have a digital slr for sale by 9/1/03.
For sale means it's listed on a major
On Mon, 14 Oct 2002, Rubenstein, Bruce M (Bruce) wrote:
The FA 100/3.5 it is! I don't have any true macro lenses, and it can't
feel any worse than a Nikon AF50/1.8.
That's what you think. It ranks right up there with Canon's EF 50/1.8,
only worse, since it's a zoom.
chris
Arnold,
Next poll suggestion. Pentax lenses you whished they still manufactured.
Bob
- Original Message -
From: Arnold Stark [EMAIL PROTECTED]
yes, now I would like to ask you to, what prime lenses would you like
that Pentax would have built in k-mount at some time in the past
On Mon, 14 Oct 2002, [iso-8859-2] £ukasz Kacperczyk wrote:
It's a very interesting read on the difference between a pro and an amateur,
Perhaps I didn't specify what I meant when I threw the pro word out, but
what I was referring to people who have a real zeal to hone their
technical side, and
If in the past or now the Pentax boss owed you a
favor, what prime lens would you have asked him to
make/would you ask him to make
Lens name: FA 400/4.5 ED IS
Length: 25cm
Diameter: 10cm
Weight: maximum 2kg
Filter Thread: 95mm
Other: image
I guess you'll just have to wing it - (RED WINGS that is)
Ken Waller
- Original Message -
From: Wendy Beard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 9:36 AM
Subject: Re: dslr
At 06:15 AM 10/14/2002 -0400, Brad wrote:
Go Leafs Go (yup, that time of
Do you know what he charges for the 5-roll min?
Bill D. Casselberry wrote:
Norm Baugher wrote:
Any suggestions? Doesn't seem to be a lot of choices.
The fellow respooling 70mm HIE is named David Romano. It
is a bit spendy for the minimum 5-rolls, but it sure sounds
Co-Founder of Apple Computers and inventor of the Integrated Woz machine,
(at least I think I got that right), and you call yourself a computer guy.
At 06:17 PM 10/14/2002 -0400, you wrote:
FWIW, Steve Wozniak
I am sorry, what is FWIW? And who is Steve Wozniak? He American?
1 - 100 of 151 matches
Mail list logo
