Hi Bill,
Remembering your recent posts about pushing C41, I have just
come into posession of the Fuji publication Professional Data
Guide number AF3-103E. This has a vast amount of film data in
it.
If you don't have this booklet and want to know anything that
might be in it, please let me know.
Cotty, I don't have a Mac but, from what I read it is stable as long as you
can allocate enough memory for it. If you want, I'll look to see what they
recommend. OS-X and Windows both automatically allocate memory.
Thanks Len,
I have have a Gb currently and I have 420k allocated to PS 5.5. I
At 21:53 9.1.2003 -0500, you wrote:
135mm f/1.8 AF with good manual focus capability. Same optics as the A lens.
André
--
Yes, and FA* 85/1.4 with the A* 85/1.4 optics. Rectilinear FA* 15/2 or 15/2.8
along the lines of the SMC 15/3.5 would be nice too ;-)
Antti-Pekka
---
* Antti-Pekka
on 09.01.03 20:02, Cotty at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi gang,
Anyone running Photoshop 7 on a Mac under 9.X and *not* OS X ? Any issues
that you have found? Is it stable?
I am running it on PM G4/400 for 3 months and no problems so far, excepto
for MacOS 9.2.2 that sometimes get confused
At 00:08 10.1.2003 -0600, you wrote:
hey- don't laugh- I've got a f/3.5 1050mm (fl) telescope that has a 70mm image
circle. I have yet to use it with the 67 for anything terristrial.
-Ryan Brooks
Hmm... a Takahashi ;-) ?
Antti-Pekka
---
* Antti-Pekka Virjonen * Fiskarsinkatu 7 D *
I'm using JEXT for HTML, PHP, Java and so on. It's free and works well
enough, but is strictly a coding tool. The only hassle I have had is that
you have to fiddle around to get it to recognise that an SHTML extension
indicates an HTML file. If it doesn't recognise the extension it won't turn
on
Shaun,
I used Arachnophilia some time back but found it a bit buggy. I moved to
EvrSoft 1st Page 2000 and found that very good. But I also have DreamWeaver
UltraDev 4.0 and some of the features are very useful. I've tried other HTML
editors and still have a few hanging around. Very often I simply
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think I want to save this whole thing and reread
it next time somebody claims
that Mac usage is SIMPLER than the most common
alternative ... :)
Some things are simpler. But on the whole, it's an
equally frustrating machine, just in different ways. I
could go
ROTFLMAO and several times so...
SK ...or as Sir Humphrey Appleby may say,
SK A multiplicity of scientific visualization devices implement a form of
SK junction rectification whereby heat is discharged, or absorbed, when an
SK electric current passes across a junction between two materials as
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Second vote -- or a decent FA 200-400 f4 zoom
(35mm). Which seems to be some kind of impossibility
(been looking around).
Not impossible. Nikon made a 200-400/4. Good luck
getting your hands on one but they made it. It looks
big and heavy.
Mark
Was that slapping or striking?
keith whaley
Peter Alling wrote:
Then there's the story of the truck hijacker who was on trial in Texas
for striking a police officer. It seems he'd hijacked a trailer
full of beef rectums. The arresting officer just couldn't stop laughing.
At 05:52 PM
--- Dan Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mark,
I had problems with Epson's driver, too, until I
suddenly realized
problems only happened when OS 9 was running in the
background?you
might check if it's the same for you.
The print driver has worked fine except that it lacks
the two (and
Hi!
Well, I am guilty of being a programmer. Furthermore, once upon a time
I was quite fluent in TeX and LaTeX if you know what it is :). Darn,
Donald Knuth came once to my university to give some lectures
including some on WeB and Weave... It was some time around 1993 or
1994.
Anyway, before I
Hi!
I did not buy too many new camera bodies. In fact only one - the ZX-L.
After I went through the first set of original batteries in less than
20 films and bought 750 g. heavy Soligor lens I also bought the FG
grip. It is excellent thing to have - no headache about the exotic
batteries, way
Bruce Rubenstein wrote:
No shit.
BR
Very little, actually...
keith
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Whud he say?
--Dumb Guy
I would opt for a series - the old SMC Pentax lenses. They are highly prised
and getting hard to find used.
Bob
- Original Message -
From: tom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 12:54 PM
Subject: RE: What Lens Do YOU Want?
-Original Message-
Hi!
Hear this :)
I want a point and shoot camera with 24-105/?.??-5.6! lens. The camera
should have at least shutter priority or aperture priority program. I
think it will allow Pentax to collect some fine profit...
Naturally viewfinder should be right above the lens so that at least
half of
When Amateur photographer tested the 43mm 1.9 a couple of years ago against the likes
of Leica, Contax and Nikon standard lenses the Pentax came top of the pile. The MTF
curves were amazing and they said it set a new standard for standard lenses. I expect
that it's therefore better than the
I was being somewhat tongue in cheek there. While LN can cool a
semi-conductor down to almost no noise, it is kind of bulky and
inconvenient.
Ciao,
Graywolf
http://pages.prodigy.net/graywolfphoto
- Original Message -
From: Rob Studdert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
No problem. I have it working now. It was a dumb blonde catagory error. e.g.
PS won't recognise the USB printer if the printer wasn't on when PS was
open. BTW, according to USB standards, it should. I usually leave the
printer off unless I am going to print something in color (have a laser
printer
1.) 35/1.2
2.) 35-85/2.3
Steve Larson
Redondo Beach, California
Everyone has a photographic memory. Some just don't have film.
- Original Message -
From: Mike Johnston [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 5:27 PM
Subject: What Lens Do YOU Want?
Liquid Nitrogen Plus Photon lube(tm).
Bob
- Original Message -
From: T Rittenhouse [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 10:50 AM
Subject: Re: Can digital capture do TIME exposures?
Yep, a little liquid nitrogen will do wonders.
Ciao,
Graywolf
Well, thanks for the donation. Wasn't a hardware problem (see my answer to
Rob S, I knew that to start with. I do appreciate the help. I was trying to
be funny (remember the GRIN?
Ciao,
Graywolf
http://pages.prodigy.net/graywolfphoto
- Original Message -
From: Peter Alling [EMAIL
The D-Lab works in the sRGB colour space. If you embed profiles in your
files then it may be able to automatically convert from other spaces
(Adobe RGB etc). But I'm not sure about that.
i work in sRGB too, so if the operator sent the files straight through,
then the differences are in the
I wouldn't mind doing that. I'd have to get an antenna up, but a long wire
and a tuner should do.
Len (KD9S)
-
From: Bill Owens [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: The Brotherhood
Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2003 21:52:32 -0500
How many of us hams have HF
Message text written by INTERNET:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
No problem. I have it working now. It was a dumb blonde catagory error.
e.g.
PS won't recognise the USB printer if the printer wasn't on when PS was
open. BTW, according to USB standards, it should. I usually leave the
printer off unless I am
Shaun,
I use Homesite version 4.51. It's old, but do the job nicely. Homesite is shareware,
but the functionality doesn't expire after 30 days. I think that's unique to the 4.51
version. Pretty sure I'm gonna buy that program one of these days, though... :-)
Another editor I like is HTML-kit
SMCA 14/3.5,
SMCA 6/4 a la Nikon
both requiring mirror lockup
How many of us hams have HF privileges? Maybe we could set up a
sked and meet via radio? Probably 40 or 20 meters?
Well, I have full HF privileges (Extra class license), but I also
have almost no ham gear any more (much of it was turned into Pentax
gear - g - so, fellows, carry on...
Fred
$100 is not a bad price to check out this focal length. In the M42 mount,
slower 400s (f/6.3) are a dime a dozen and often preset or manual aperture.
Faster M42 400s are scarce; the models I know of are
- Sport Zoomar 400/4 and Zoomar Killfit Sport 400/4.5 (I think these are two
different
This one time, at band camp,
Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
free-ware. PPWizard is based on REXX programming/scripting language
Gee, takes me back to my OS/2 days
Kevin
--
Please avoid sending me Word or PowerPoint attachments.
See
Eschew obfuscation!
Simon King [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...or as Sir Humphrey Appleby may say,
A multiplicity of scientific visualization devices implement a form of
junction rectification whereby heat is discharged, or absorbed, when an
electric current passes across a junction between two
At 07:25 10.1.2003 -0500, you wrote:
How many of us hams have HF privileges? Maybe we could set up a
sked and meet via radio? Probably 40 or 20 meters?
Well, I have full HF privileges (Extra class license), but I also
have almost no ham gear any more (much of it was turned into Pentax
gear -
Dave xm4245855 ( I know its not 'real' radiog
Dave Brooks
Begin Original Message
From: Jeff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thu, 09 Jan 2003 20:53:15 +
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: The Brotherhood
Jeff, Tokayer.
Bill Owens wrote:
Bill, KG4LOV
QRZ?
-Mat, N2NJZ
Collin
T Rittenhouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No problem. I have it working now. It was a dumb blonde catagory error. e.g.
PS won't recognise the USB printer if the printer wasn't on when PS was
open. BTW, according to USB standards, it should. I usually leave the
printer off unless I am going to print
I wouldn't mind doing that. I'd have to get an antenna up, but a long
wire
and a tuner should do.
Len (KD9S)
That's what I use Len. Due to antenna restrictions, I run wire around the
edge of the house and use an auto tuner for my Alinco DX-70
Bill
Worse, I use K-edit a X-edit emulator for the PC. (I cut my teeth programming
ForTran on Mainframes).
At 01:50 AM 1/10/2003 -0500, you wrote:
Peter Alling commented:
What HTML editors or web page creation software are PDMLer's using for
their web sites? I am still using Frontpage 2000,
VI the editor that time forgot, as if someone had turned edlin from
dos into a full screen editor.
At 07:06 PM 1/10/2003 +1100, you wrote:
I'm using JEXT for HTML, PHP, Java and so on. It's free and works well
enough, but is strictly a coding tool. The only hassle I have had is that
you have to
Have you tried Echolink?
www.echolink.org/el
Alan (G1gop)
Those who do not learn from Dilbert are doomed to repeat it.
-Original Message-
From: Leonard Paris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 2:32 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: The Brotherhood
I can
You don't know how true this was to be...
I had an invitation to attend the high school all-star football game held at
the Alamodome last Sunday. I would have had a press pass and access to the
field.
Alas, there was no reasonable air fare to be found. And, sorry guys, that
was just a bit too
See my response to Dan.
You know I honestly thought about whether or not to re-skin it. With three
normal ones, it will become difficult to tell them apart. Except for the
one from Italia, it has a special little badge on its front.
Chances are it will remain as it is though. But just in case
That's true any editor you extend in LISP had to be written by a sadist.
At 08:59 AM 1/10/2003 -0500, you wrote:
On Thu, 9 Jan 2003, Peter Alling wrote:
I'm opposed to most wysiwig editors on principal but you're just sick. :)
Don't look at me, Mishka said _emacs_!
(although I wonder if
Could people mark replies to Bruce in the topic line so I can ignore them
entirely?
At 09:15 AM 1/10/2003 -0600, you wrote:
No shit.
BR
Habitual profanity is the inarticulate mind attempting to express itself
forcefully.
--Mike
Outside of a dog, a book is man's best friend.
Inside of
Keith Whaley wrote:
Paul Stenquist wrote:
The PhotoShop tutorials are quite adequate. You just have to see them
through from start to finish.
Paul
All facetiousness aside, I do believe you.
My single objection to PhotoShop is it's massiveness complexity,
similar to latest versions
At 19:27 2003-01-09 -0600, Mike Johnston wrote:
If you could direct Pentax to make and market one lens it currently does not
make, what would it be?
Funny, we were just moaning about this on the Cosina Voigtlander list:
In the same series as the Limited edition 1.9/43 lens there are also a
I was amused that the recent Pop Photo had an article on shooting with
the sun in the picture and the author was using a Spottie II with SMC
Lenses. Of course, when they compared the new Rebel to the competition,
no Pentax camera was even mentioned.
Steven Desjardins
Department of Chemistry
I don't agree. Photoshop is as complicated or uncomplicated as you make it.
There are many features that you may not use and may never use but once you
start exploring there is no limit to the creativity it offers. I regularly
read through my manual, not because I have to but because I want to
I'd just like to get the time to use what I have more often...
Vic
No, I haven't. I'll give it a look/see and find out what it's all about.
Thanks for the pointer.
Len (KD9S)
-
Have you tried Echolink?
www.echolink.org/el
Alan (G1gop)
Those who do not learn from Dilbert are doomed to repeat it.
Peter wrote:
PA You must be kidding. Every SLR they've introduced since 1987, except for
PA LX and K1000 variants were highly dependant on electronics and
PA software, (usually in the form of firmware). The days of
PA mechanical or even electro-mechanical cameras with a bit of add on
PA
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=1951053760category=15240
Is this truely for cleaning cameras?
It's appearance reminds me of some medical function. ;)
Collin
Yes, but con should be con:
and we still depend on ddt, stat, etc.
Collin
***
From: Doug Franklin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Personally I like: copy con index.htm
real programmers use: copy con program.com
;-)
TTYL, DougF KG4LMZ
I could use a rig.
Anyone got one to partial/trade for some of my good stuff?
Collin
On Friday 10 January 2003 11:51, Collin Brendemuehl wrote:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=1951053760category=1524
0
Is this truely for cleaning cameras?
It's appearance reminds me of some medical function. ;)
Collin
Medical or... otherwise
Christian
These are all AF lenses. Many are updates of existing
lenses:
-FA* 17/20-35mm f3.5 AL: NO power zoom, all metal,
same optical characters (generally) as the 20-35 mm f4
AL
-FA*80-200mm f2.8 f4: NO power Zoom
-updated FA version of the F 70-210 f4-5.6: the one
with ED glass; the current crop of
AMEN TO THAT!!
I'd still like to swap my Sigma 17-35 for one with SMC glass though and
would have bought the 80-200f2.8 if it werent so damn big heavy.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 10 January 2003 16:40
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
Turkey Baster
that's a classy turkey baster
Cheers,
Dave
Original Message:
-
From: Christian Skofteland [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2003 13:10:00 -0500
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Really?
On Friday 10 January 2003 11:51, Collin Brendemuehl wrote:
Mike,
I'm not sure what you mean by large-structure contrast and
small-structure resolution. Could you please elaborate?
Michael Cross
Mike Johnston wrote:
It depends what you like. If you tend to like lenses with high
large-structure contrast, you may not take to the 43mm particularly. If
I think I've mentioned it many times as well, nevertheless I second it:
high quality, constant F4 70/80-200/210 tele zoom. I think it is missing
in the lineup and yes, I'd buy it.
Matjaz
I think I mentioned it far too many times, but since someone asked
again, I don't mind to say it again.
That's an evil wicked looking thing.
At 12:16 PM 1/10/2003 -0500, you wrote:
Turkey Baster
that's a classy turkey baster
Cheers,
Dave
Original Message:
-
From: Christian Skofteland [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2003 13:10:00 -0500
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re:
And he specifically said Pentax cameras. I wonder if this isn't a bit of
humor posted to eBay by someone on the PDML that we all know and love. What
do you think?
Len
---
From: Collin Brendemuehl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Really?
Date: Fri,
- Original Message -
From: Collin Brendemuehl
Subject: Really?
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=1951053760ca
tegory=15240
Is this truely for cleaning cameras?
It's appearance reminds me of some medical function. ;)
Whether it's original design was medical or
I never said that I never made a syntax error in my life, but I do spell
pretty darned good anyway. :^)
I miss that old Dynamic Debugging Tool. But Super Utility was a lot better.
;-)
Len
---
From: Collin Brendemuehl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL
Rob Brigham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd still like to swap my Sigma 17-35 for one with SMC glass though and
would have bought the 80-200f2.8 if it werent so damn big heavy.
How is the Sigma?
--
Mark Roberts
Photography and writing
www.robertstech.com
Collin Brendemuehl wrote:
I could use a rig.
Anyone got one to partial/trade for some of my good stuff?
Collin
I've got an Icom 737 gathering dust. Let's talk off list.
-Ryan
Ah, you kids and your HTML editors.
In my day we used sticks to scratch out our code in the dirt...
('course, we had to photograph the result with a digital camera and OCR the
image into a text file, but still...)
--
Mark Roberts
Photography and writing
www.robertstech.com
Antti-Pekka Virjonen wrote:
At 00:08 10.1.2003 -0600, you wrote:
hey- don't laugh- I've got a f/3.5 1050mm (fl) telescope that has a 70mm image circle. I have yet to use it with the 67 for anything terristrial.
-Ryan Brooks
Hmm... a Takahashi ;-) ?
Ding Ding! Epsilion 300.
-R
I tend to agree. I moved to to Photoshop late last year after using PD and PE
for a few years. The added horsepower has me to reduces my overall costs and
generally improve the overall quality of the photos I use in my work. I've found
the learning exercise to be interesting and helpful in
Peter Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That depends on your OS as well.
Yep. The original Win95 won't do USB at all. Win 95 OSR2 had USB capability
but it was a bit shaky. Win98 seems to be rock solid with USB as far as I
can tell - at least, since I updated my chipset drivers after I bought my
It comes up periodically that someone
is looking for the F* 300/4.5.
KEH has one listed.
http://www.keh.com/shop/product.cfm?bid=PKcid=06sid=newusedcrid=4351225
Collin
Apparently everyone's mileage varies. I'm using ME for it's disaster recovery
capabilities, I'm constantly doing something that causes systems lockups.
ME recovers from a re-boot after a lockup more often. (I hate to think the
number of times I've had to re-install 95 and 98 because they got so
Okay, I just ordered the FA 24 f2.0 from Adorama. Thanks to everyone for
your advice.
My gadget bag is full. Adding this lens will probably mean that my FA 50
f1.7 has to come out. I spent November in France with six lenses. The 50
was the only one that didn't get used. I could have used the 24.
What is the purpose of liquid nitrogen and where is it used?
Feroze
- Original Message -
From: T Rittenhouse [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 1:50 AM
Subject: Re: Can digital capture do TIME exposures?
Yep, a little liquid nitrogen will do wonders.
It comes up periodically that someone is looking for the F*
300/4.5.
And, in my opinion, with good reason. As much as I love the M*/A*
300/4's for their compactness and speed, it is hard not to like the
optically superb and well-built F* 300/4.5. It's my favorite
autofocus lens (used
I'm surprised Henry would do that. I've had quite a few dealings with BH
with no problems. The only thing I dislike about BH is that they bill your
credit card at the time of order instead of at the time of shipment. This
goes for stuff on back order, too. However, they tell you they are
Mike wrote:
If you could direct Pentax to make and market one lens it currently does not
make, what would it be?
400/4 with or without IS.
Pål
Henry wrote:
From expertise point of view, Casio appears to compliment well with Pentax.
One is an experienced manufacturer for consumer electronics product but they
know nothing about optical design. Pentax has declared their intention on
shifting their camera line to digital which
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 3:19 AM
Subject: Re: What Lens Do YOU Want?
In a message dated 1/9/2003 9:00:48 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
An FA 400 2.8 for 35mm.
-R
I'd go with that
Steve,
Is Rolla still the school of mines?
--
Ken Archer Canine Photography
San Antonio, Texas
Business Is Going To The Dogs
Pål Jensen wrote:
Henry wrote:
From expertise point of view, Casio appears to compliment well with Pentax.
One is an experienced manufacturer for consumer electronics product but they
know nothing about optical design. Pentax has declared their intention on
shifting their camera
On Friday, January 10, 2003, at 04:59 AM, Mark D. wrote:
--- Dan Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mark,
I had problems with Epson's driver, too, until I
suddenly realized
problems only happened when OS 9 was running in the
background?you
might check if it's the same for you.
The print
One and all:
I'd have to differ on the merits of IS, having recently moved from Pentax to
Canon for my main photo system. I own the 28-135 IS and 100-400 IS zooms.
My son, a bird photographer, owns the 300/4 IS. (You Oregonians on the list can
see some examples of his work in the current issue
Don't get me wrong, I love the Sigma 17-35, 100-30/f4 EX and 28-70/f2.8
lenses that I own, but for the wide in particular some more flare
resistance wouldn't go amiss. I think the 20-35 is probably better at
20mm and above, but I often go wider than that and for a DSLR with 1.5*
crop 20 is not
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on
01/10/03
at 03:08 PM, Dan Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
|Really hard for me to understand how these megacorporations can't do
|as well.
not a can't its a won't. new hardware sells new software and new
software sells new hardware. An hardware company that is
Pål Jensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 1/9/2003 9:00:48 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
An FA 400 2.8 for 35mm.
I'd go with that -- something good for wild life photography that would not also
break the bank.
A 400/2.8 that would not break the bank?
Rob Brigham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Don't get me wrong, I love the Sigma 17-35, 100-30/f4 EX and 28-70/f2.8
lenses that I own, but for the wide in particular some more flare
resistance wouldn't go amiss. I think the 20-35 is probably better at
20mm and above, but I often go wider than that and
On Friday, January 10, 2003, at 09:12 AM, Mike Johnston wrote:
It depends what you like. If you tend to like lenses with high
large-structure contrast, you may not take to the 43mm particularly.
If you
like lenses with very high small-structure resolution, you will
probably
love the 43mm. I
In a message dated 1/10/2003 4:37:39 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
Pål Jensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 1/9/2003 9:00:48 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
An FA 400 2.8 for 35mm.
I'd go with that -- something good for wild
Ahh, wellOZ7AFP, class A/1 licence (i.e. HF) - however lost most
of my rig in a fire (no cameras got hurt) and currently living where
I cannot put up anything more than 144MHz antennas :( Gotta hope for
serious scatter to reach all the way over the pond with that
--thomas
On Thu, 9 Jan
That is strange, I just looked at the Adobe website, and it is explicitly
stated the upgrades are not for Photoshop LE, deluxe or elements. Did it work
for you from LE?
Frits
On Thursday 09 January 2003 13:34, Leonard Paris wrote:
Here's a somehow little known fact about PhotoShop 7. Chances
Really I meant to ask what it had to do with photography, last time i heard
they use it
to break into safes and locks, and cut warts off too
- Original Message -
From: Peter Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 9:12 PM
Subject: Re: Re: Can digital
How do you guys know these things is what worrys me most
Feroze
Oh No I'm a member of a list that will have me as a member
- Original Message -
From: Bob Blakely [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 10:04 PM
Subject: Re: Really?
Available free in West
I feel sorry for the turkey...
cheers,
frank
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Turkey Baster
that's a classy turkey baster
Cheers,
Dave
Original Message:
-
From: Christian Skofteland [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2003 13:10:00 -0500
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
Mike Johnston wrote:
Vic
I agree with Vic on this. I've never taken a course on Photoshop, never read
the manual (I've tried; I just can't seem to pay attention). But I find that
if I explore, I begin to see what does what, and as that knowledge accrues I
can figure out ways to do
Message text written by INTERNET:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Really I meant to ask what it had to do with photography, last time i
heard
they use it to break into safes and locks, and cut warts off too
oh, all right. they refrigerate the digital sensor and the amplifiers to
lower thermal noise. works best
A shift AND TILT lens, like Canon's 24, 45 90!
_
Help STOP SPAM: Try the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE*
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
Thanks for all the comments regarding peoples HTML editors etc. I have
never had the time to learn HTML coding beyond the basics, so I will
have to stick with a bit of WYSIWYG program. I hace just discovered that
Dreamweaver 3.0 combined with Fireworks 3.0 does exactly what I want,
and I have
Tilt is not really an asset at 28mm on a 35mm camera. At 24mm, I consider it
a tremendous waste of money. You already have tremendous depth of field at
28mm so this function usually only adds weight and poorer lens performance.
If you need to be faster than f/4, there may be some benefit. Poorer
- Original Message -
From: Bob Blakely
Subject: Re: Really?
I saw one of those when I was a child. No one's EVER going to
put one of
those up there again!
They didn't use the baby version?
WW
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Really?
Bill,
I'm not going to ask how you know such detailed information on
this product
;-)
General knowledge never hurts, especially when it comes to home
medical devices.
William Robb
Dave
Original Message:
1 - 100 of 133 matches
Mail list logo
